Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-VSI Alliance, 8823-8824 [05-3436]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 23, 2005 / Notices 8823 3752 (February 2005), entitled Outboard Engines from Japan: Investigation No. 731–TA–1069 (Final). DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Antitrust Division Issued: February 17, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–3415 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—United States Adopted Names Council Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—VSI Alliance BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Notice is hereby given that, on September 9, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (‘‘ASHP’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD. The nature and scope of ASHP’s standards development activities are: The publication of guidance documents of varying scope that provide ongoing advice to pharmacy practitioners and health-systems to improve the medication use process, patient care and safety, and patient outcomes and quality of life. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–3437 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), United States Adopted Names Council (‘‘USAN’’) on behalf of itself and its sponsors has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: United States Adopted Names Council, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of USAN’s standards development activities are: The development of standards for simple and unique nonproprietary names for drugs by establishing logical nomenclature classifications based on pharmacological and/or chemical relationships. The USAN is sponsored by the American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association, and United States Pharmacopeia. USAN works closely with the World Health Organization International Nonproprietary Name Committee (INN) and various national nomenclature groups to develop global standardization and unification of drug nomenclature and related rules to ensure that drug information is communicated accurately and unambiguously. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–3438 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M VerDate jul<14>2003 16:28 Feb 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice is hereby given that, on January 19, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the VSI Alliance has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Agere Systems, Inc., Allentown, PA; ARC International PLC, Nashua, NH; CNRS-Centre National De Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France; ControlNet, Inc., Campbell, CA; Design and Reuse, Grenoble, France; eSilicon Corp., Sunnyvale, CA; Fraunhofer IPMS, Dresden, Germany; HCL Technologies Indian Pvt., Ltd., Chennai, India; ITRIIndustrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA; Macronix International Company, Ltd., Hsinchu, Taiwan; M–Techno Structure IT-Solution GMBH, Vienna, Austria; Morpho Technologies, Irvine, CA; NewLogic Technologies AG, Lustenau, Austria; Renesas Technology Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Sanyo LSI Technology, India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; SilTerra Malaysia Sdu. Bhd., Sunnyvale, CA; Synchronicity, Inc., Marlboro, MA; TaraCom Integrated Products, Sunnyvale, CA; Tower Semiconductor, Ltd., Migdal Haemek, Israel; VCX, Limited, Livingston, Scotland, United Kingdom; WIS Technologies, San Jose, CA; and Xignal Technologies, AG Unterhaching, Germany have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812). E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1 8824 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 23, 2005 / Notices The last notification was filed with the Department on October 8, 2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 3, 2004 (69 FR 70284). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–3436 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,181] Aladdin Industries, LLC, Corporate Headquarters, Nashville, TN; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of January 19, 2005, the company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternate Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The negative determination was signed on January 4, 2005, and will soon be published in the Federal Register. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The request for reconsideration asserts that the workers subject of this petition worked alongside, and should be treated the same as, workers of Aladdin Industries, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, who were previously certified eligible to apply for the TAA under petition number TA–W–41,514. The certification for TA–W–41,514 was issued on July 18, 2002, and provided coverage to workers engaged in employment related to the production of hot and cold insulated products, including thermos bottles and beverages mugs, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 19, 2001, through July 18, 2004. The certification was based on the VerDate jul<14>2003 16:28 Feb 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 findings that sales, production, and employment declined during the period under investigation (2000, 2001 and January through March 2002). During that same time period company imports of thermos bottles and beverage mugs increased. The petition for TA–W–56,181, initiated on December 8, 2004, was filed by a company official on behalf of workers of the Corporate Headquarters of Aladdin Industries, Nashville, Tennessee. The company had sold the firm and production ceased on August 2, 2002. For more than one year prior to the date of the petition, the subject company did not produce any article at its Nashville, Tennessee facility. The investigation found that the corporate headquarters worker group was engaged in closing out the remaining business. Specifically, the activities at corporate headquarters consisted of accounting, employee benefits (insurance and pension), and clearing out and selling machinery. The petition was denied because the firm did not produce an article within the meaning of Section 222(a)(2) of the Trade Act. Furthermore, the workers did not support production at an affiliated facility whose workers independently met the statutory criteria for TAA certification since Aladdin Industries, LLC ceased production in August 2002, more than one year prior to the petition date (December 1, 2004). Therefore, the Department determined that the corporate headquarters worker group cannot be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the subject worker group must be certified eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance TAA. Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the worker group cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of February, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–700 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,343] Dorby Group aka Dorby Frocks Ltd. New York, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 14, 2004, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Dorby Group, AKA Dorby Frocks LTD., New York, New York. The Department of Labor issued a negative determination applicable to the petitioning group of workers on January 21, 2005 (TA–W–56,240). No new information or change in circumstances is evident which would result in a reversal of the Department’s previous determination. Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of February, 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–711 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications for Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8823-8824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--VSI Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 19, 2005, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the VSI Alliance has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Agere Systems, 
Inc., Allentown, PA; ARC International PLC, Nashua, NH; CNRS-Centre 
National De Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France; ControlNet, Inc., 
Campbell, CA; Design and Reuse, Grenoble, France; eSilicon Corp., 
Sunnyvale, CA; Fraunhofer IPMS, Dresden, Germany; HCL Technologies 
Indian Pvt., Ltd., Chennai, India; ITRI-Industrial Technology Research 
Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA; 
Macronix International Company, Ltd., Hsinchu, Taiwan; M-Techno 
Structure IT-Solution GMBH, Vienna, Austria; Morpho Technologies, 
Irvine, CA; NewLogic Technologies AG, Lustenau, Austria; Renesas 
Technology Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Sanyo LSI Technology, India Pvt. 
Ltd., Bangalore, India; SilTerra Malaysia Sdu. Bhd., Sunnyvale, CA; 
Synchronicity, Inc., Marlboro, MA; TaraCom Integrated Products, 
Sunnyvale, CA; Tower Semiconductor, Ltd., Migdal Haemek, Israel; VCX, 
Limited, Livingston, Scotland, United Kingdom; WIS Technologies, San 
Jose, CA; and Xignal Technologies, AG Unterhaching, Germany have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).

[[Page 8824]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 8, 
2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 3, 2004 (69 FR 70284).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-3436 Filed 2-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.