Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for Classified Information Security Violations; Correction, 8716 [05-3423]

Download as PDF 8716 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations PART 985—MARKETING ORDER REGULATING THE HANDLING OF SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE FAR WEST 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 985 continues to read as follows: n Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. In § 985.223, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows: n (Note: This section will not appear in the annual Code of Federal Regulations.) § 985.223 Salable quantities and allotment percentages—2004–2005 marketing year. * * * * * (b) Class 3 (Native) oil—a salable quantity of 1,267,562 pounds and an allotment percentage of 59 percent. Dated: February 16, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–3480 Filed 2–18–05; 9:05 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 824 [Docket No. SO–RM–00–01] RIN 1992–AA28 Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for Classified Information Security Violations; Correction AGENCY: Office of Security, Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy published a final rule on January 26, 2005, establishing 10 CFR Part 824 to implement section 234B of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. This document corrects an inadvertent omission in one sentence of the final rule. DATES: This final rule is effective on February 25, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geralyn Praskievicz, (202) 586–4451 or, JoAnn Williams, (202) 586–6899. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document makes a correction to a final rule that was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2005 (67 FR 3599). In rule document FR Doc. 05–1303, appearing on page 3599, in the issue of Wednesday, January 26, 2005, the following correction is made. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:23 Feb 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 Adrianne G. Threatt, Counsel (202) 452– 3554, Legal Division. For users of § 824.2 [Corrected] Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263– n Beginning on page 3607, in the third column, § 824.2(c) is corrected to read as 4869. follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulation CC establishes the maximum period a * * * * * depositary bank may wait between (c) Individual employees. No civil receiving a deposit and making the penalty may be assessed against an deposited funds available for individual employee of a contractor or withdrawal.1 A depositary bank any other entity which enters into an generally must provide faster agreement with DOE. Issued in Washington, DC, on February 16, availability for funds deposited by a local check than by a nonlocal check. A 2005. check drawn on a bank is considered Glenn S. Podonsky, local if it is payable by or at a bank Director, Office of Security and Safety located in the same Federal Reserve Performance Assurance. check processing region as the [FR Doc. 05–3423 Filed 2–22–05; 8:45 am] depositary bank. A check drawn on a BILLING CODE 6450–01–P nonbank is considered local if it is payable through a bank located in the same Federal Reserve check processing FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM region as the depositary bank. Checks that do not meet the requirements for 12 CFR Part 229 local checks are considered nonlocal. Appendix A to Regulation CC [Regulation CC; Docket No. R–1224] contains a routing number guide that assists banks in identifying local and Availability of Funds and Collection of nonlocal banks and thereby determining Checks the maximum permissible hold periods AGENCY: Board of Governors of the for most deposited checks. The Federal Reserve System. appendix includes a list of each Federal ACTION: Final rule; technical Reserve check processing office and the amendment. first four digits of the routing number, known as the Federal Reserve routing SUMMARY: The Board of Governors is symbol, of each bank that is served by amending appendix A of Regulation CC that office for check processing to delete the reference to the Detroit purposes. Banks whose Federal Reserve branch office of the Federal Reserve routing symbols are grouped under the Bank of Chicago and reassign the same office are in the same check Federal Reserve routing symbols processing region and thus are local to currently listed under that office to the one another. head office of the Federal Reserve Bank As explained in detail in the Board’s of Cleveland and delete the reference to final rule published in the Federal the Houston branch office of the Federal Register on September 28, 2004, the Reserve Bank of Dallas and reassign the Federal Reserve Banks have decided to routing numbers listed under that office reduce further the number of locations to the head office of that Reserve Bank. at which they process checks.2 The These amendments will ensure that the amendments set forth in this notice are information in appendix A accurately part of a series of appendix A describes the actual structure of check amendments related to that decision, processing operations within the and the Board will issue separate Federal Reserve System. notices for each phase of the restructuring.3 DATES: The amendments to appendix A As part of the restructuring process, under the Fourth and Seventh Federal Reserve Districts (Federal Reserve Banks the Detroit branch office of the Federal of Cleveland and Chicago) are effective 1 For purposes of Regulation CC, the term ‘‘bank’’ on April 16, 2005. The amendments to refers to any depository institution, including appendix A under the Eleventh Federal commercial banks, savings institutions, and credit Reserve District (Federal Reserve Bank unions. 2 See 69 FR 57837, September 28, 2004. of Dallas) are effective on April 23, 3 In addition to the general advance notice of 2005. PART 824—[CORRECTED] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack K. Walton II, Assistant Director (202) 452–2660, or Joseph P. Baressi, Senior Financial Services Analyst (202) 452– 3959, Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems; or PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 future amendments provided by the Board, and the Board’s notices of final amendments, the Reserve Banks are striving to inform affected depository institutions of the exact date of each office transition at least 120 days in advance. The Reserve Banks’ communications to affected depository institutions are available at https:// www.frbservices.org. E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3423]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 824

[Docket No. SO-RM-00-01]
RIN 1992-AA28


Procedural Rules for the Assessment of Civil Penalties for 
Classified Information Security Violations; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Security, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy published a final rule on January 26, 
2005, establishing 10 CFR Part 824 to implement section 234B of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954. This document corrects an inadvertent 
omission in one sentence of the final rule.

DATES: This final rule is effective on February 25, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geralyn Praskievicz, (202) 586-4451 
or, JoAnn Williams, (202) 586-6899.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document makes a correction to a final 
rule that was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2005 (67 
FR 3599).
    In rule document FR Doc. 05-1303, appearing on page 3599, in the 
issue of Wednesday, January 26, 2005, the following correction is made.

PART 824--[CORRECTED]


Sec.  824.2  [Corrected]

0
Beginning on page 3607, in the third column, Sec.  824.2(c) is 
corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (c) Individual employees. No civil penalty may be assessed against 
an individual employee of a contractor or any other entity which enters 
into an agreement with DOE.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 16, 2005.
Glenn S. Podonsky,
Director, Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance.
[FR Doc. 05-3423 Filed 2-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.