National Park Service, 8624-8625 [05-3347]
Download as PDF
8624
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obligated to respond.
Comments: Before submitting an ICR
to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A)
requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide
notice * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *’’.
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Agencies must also estimate the ‘‘nonhour cost’’ burdens to respondents or
recordkeepers resulting from the
collection of information. Therefore, if
you have costs to generate, maintain,
and disclose this information, you
should comment and provide your total
capital and startup cost components or
annual operation, maintenance, and
purchase of service components. You
should describe the methods you use to
estimate major cost factors, including
system and technology acquisition,
expected useful life of capital
equipment, discount rate(s), and the
period over which you incur costs.
Capital and startup costs include,
among other items, computers and
software you purchase to prepare for
collecting information, monitoring, and
record storage facilities. You should not
include estimates for equipment or
services purchased: (i) Before October 1,
1995; (ii) to comply with requirements
not associated with the information
collection; (iii) for reasons other than to
provide information or keep records for
the Government; or (iv) as part of
customary and usual business or private
practices.
We will summarize written responses
to this notice and address them in our
submission for OMB approval. As a
result of your comments, we will make
any necessary adjustments to the burden
in our submission to OMB.
Public Comment Procedure: MMS’s
practice is to make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
regular business hours. If you wish your
name and/or address to be withheld,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. MMS will
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:10 Feb 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
honor this request to the extent
allowable by law; however, anonymous
comments will not be considered. All
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
MMS Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (202)
208–7744.
Dated: February 9, 2005.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–3242 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
30-Day Notice of Submission of Study
Package to Office of Management and
Budget; Opportunity for Public
Comment
National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
AGENCY:
Notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Cape Cod National
Seashore Impacts of Hunting Survey of
Hunters, Visitors and Residents will
provide park managers and others with
important social science input about
public attitudes on hunting and an
assessment about whether conflicts over
hunting are occurring at the Cape Cod
National Seashore. Specifically the
study will use hunter, resident and
visitor surveys to (1) assess attitudes
about hunting and hunting programs at
the Cape Cod National Seashore, (2)
determine the extent of conflict between
hunters and nonhunters in the Cape Cod
National Seashore and surrounding
communities, (3) assess the extent to
which the attitudes and characteristics
of area residents and visitors to Cape
Cod National Seashore have changed
since the early 1990s, and (4) estimate
the extent, and distribution of hunters
and profile the behaviors of hunters
within the Seashore.
Estimated numbers
of
Responses
Cape Cod National
Seashore Impacts
of Hunting Survey
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Burden
hours
2,900
929
Sfmt 4703
Under provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 CFR Part
1320, Reporting and Record Keeping
Requirements, the National Park Service
(NPS) invites comments on a request
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to approve a new
collection of information (OMB #1024–
XXXX). Comments are invited on: (1)
The practical utility of the information
being gathered; (2) the accuracy of the
burden hour estimate; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden to
respondents, including use of
automated information collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Cape Cod National Seashore has been
charged by the United States District
Court, District of Massachusetts to reevaluate its hunting programs and will
be preparing an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) of hunting within its
borders. This study will provide social
science input into the EIS process by
measuring the attitudes toward hunting
among Seashore visitors and the
Seashore neighbors, the extent of
conflict between hunters and nonhunters, and the attitudes and behaviors
of hunters at the Seashore.
DATES: Public comments will be
accepted on or before March 24, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
directly to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, (OMB #
1024–XXXX) Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by fax at 202–
395–6566, or by electronic mail at
oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.
The OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
public comments within thirty days of
the date on which this notice is
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF
THE STUDY PACKAGE SUBMITTED FOR OMB
REVIEW, CONTACT: Dr. Jim Gramann,
Visiting Chief Social Scientist, National
Park Service, Social Science Program,
via phone at 202–513–7189, via fax at
202–371–2131, or via electronic mail at
james_gramann@partner.nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Titles: Cape Cod National Seashore
Impacts of Hunting Survey of Visitors
and Residents.
Bureau Form Number: None.
OMB Number: To be requested.
Expiration Date: To be requested.
Type of request: New Collection.
Description of need: Because of the
long standing tradition of hunting on
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
8625
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices
Cape Cod, the enabling legislation of
Cape Cod National Seashore in 1961
allowed for continued hunting activity
within the boundaries of the Seashore.
Animal rights groups have argued that
environmental and social conditions in
and around the Seashore have changed,
and that hunting should be
discontinued. Public meetings about
this issue have been contentious, with
the hunting community voicing strong
opposition to changes in current
hunting regulations within the
Seashore. Given the polarity of the
current debate, questions remain: Do
area residents and visitors object to
hunting in the Seashore, are they
neutral about the issue, or do they
consider it an appropriate and/or
desirable use of the area? To what extent
do residents and visitors feel threatened
by hunting activities? How often do
conflicts occur between hunters and
non-hunters during the fall and winter
hunting seasons? And what is the extent
of hunting activity on the Seashore?
This study is designed to better
understand the scope of hunting
activities at the Seashore, the degree of
conflict that occurs over the practice,
and how people feel about hunting at
the Seashore.
Automated data collection: At the
present time, there is no automated way
to gather this information because it
includes directly contacting hunters,
visitors to Cape Cod National Seashore,
and residents in the six surrounding
townships.
Description of respondents: Visitors to
Cape Cod National Seashore and
residents of the following townships on
Cape Cod: Provincetown, Truro,
Wellfleet, Eastham, Orleans, and
Chatham.
Estimated average number of
respondents: 2,900.
Estimated average number of
responses: 2,900.
Estimated average burden hours per
response: 20 minutes.
Frequency of Response: 1 time per
respondent.
Estimated annual reporting burden:
929 hours.
Dated: November 17, 2004.
Leonard E. Stowe,
Acting, National Park Service Information
Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–3347 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Continuation of Visitor Services
National Park Service, Interior.
Public notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the terms of
existing concession contracts, public
notice is hereby given that the National
Park Service intends to request a
continuation of visitor services for a
period not-to-exceed 1 year from the
date of contract expiration.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
contracts listed below have been
extended to maximum allowable under
36 CFR 51.23. Under the provisions of
current concession contracts and
pending the completion of the public
solicitation of a prospectus for a new
concession contract, the National Park
Service authorizes continuation of
visitor services for a period not-toexceed 1 year under the terms and
conditions of the current contract as
amended. The continuation of
operations does not affect any rights
with respect to selection for award of a
new concession contract.
CONCID#
Concessioner name
Park
AMIS002 ..........................................
AMIS003 ..........................................
BAND001 ........................................
BRCA002 ........................................
CAVE001 .........................................
CURE001 ........................................
Forever Resorts, LLC ............................................................................
Rough Canyon Marina ...........................................................................
Bandelier Trading, Inc ...........................................................................
Bryce-Zion Trail Rides ...........................................................................
Cavern Supply Company, Inc ................................................................
Elk Creek Marina ...................................................................................
GLAC001
GLAC003
GLAC006
GLAC010
GLCA001
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
Glacier Park Boat Company, Inc ...........................................................
Mule Shoe Outfitters, LLC .....................................................................
Glacier Wilderness Guides ....................................................................
Edward DesRosier (Sun Tours) ............................................................
Wilderness River Adventures ................................................................
GLCA021 .........................................
Banner Health, Page Hospital ...............................................................
GRCA004
GRCA005
GRTE003
LAMR002
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
Jerman-Mangum Enterprises, Inc .........................................................
Verkamps, Inc ........................................................................................
Signal Mountain .....................................................................................
Forever Resorts, LLC ............................................................................
MEVE001 ........................................
PAIS001 ..........................................
PEFO001 .........................................
ROMO001 .......................................
TICA001 ..........................................
ARAMARK .............................................................................................
Forever Resorts, LLC ............................................................................
Xanterra Parks and Resorts ..................................................................
Forever Resorts, LLC ............................................................................
Carl and Betsy Wagner .........................................................................
WHSA001 ........................................
YELL077 ..........................................
White Sands Company, Inc ...................................................................
Xanterra Parks and Resorts, Inc ...........................................................
Amistad National Recreation Area.
Amistad National Recreation Area.
Bandelier NM.
Bryce Canyon NP.
Carlsbad Caverns NP.
Curecanti National Recreation
Area.
Glacier National Park.
Glacier National Park.
Glacier National Park.
Glacier National Park.
Glen Canyon National Recreation
Area.
Glen Canyon National Recreation
Area.
Grand Canyon NP.
Grand Canyon National Park.
Grand Canyon National Park.
Lake Meredith National Recreation
Area.
Mesa Verde National Park.
Padre Island National Seashore.
Petrified Forest National Park.
Rocky Mountain National Park.
Timpanogos Cave National Monument.
White Sands National Monument.
Yellowstone National Park.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:10 Feb 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8624-8625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3347]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
30-Day Notice of Submission of Study Package to Office of
Management and Budget; Opportunity for Public Comment
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Cape Cod National Seashore Impacts of Hunting Survey of
Hunters, Visitors and Residents will provide park managers and others
with important social science input about public attitudes on hunting
and an assessment about whether conflicts over hunting are occurring at
the Cape Cod National Seashore. Specifically the study will use hunter,
resident and visitor surveys to (1) assess attitudes about hunting and
hunting programs at the Cape Cod National Seashore, (2) determine the
extent of conflict between hunters and nonhunters in the Cape Cod
National Seashore and surrounding communities, (3) assess the extent to
which the attitudes and characteristics of area residents and visitors
to Cape Cod National Seashore have changed since the early 1990s, and
(4) estimate the extent, and distribution of hunters and profile the
behaviors of hunters within the Seashore.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated numbers of
-----------------------
Burden
Responses hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cape Cod National Seashore Impacts of Hunting 2,900 929
Survey.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 CFR
Part 1320, Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements, the National Park
Service (NPS) invites comments on a request submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to approve a new collection of information
(OMB 1024-XXXX). Comments are invited on: (1) The practical
utility of the information being gathered; (2) the accuracy of the
burden hour estimate; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize
the burden to respondents, including use of automated information
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Cape Cod National Seashore has been charged by the United States
District Court, District of Massachusetts to re-evaluate its hunting
programs and will be preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
of hunting within its borders. This study will provide social science
input into the EIS process by measuring the attitudes toward hunting
among Seashore visitors and the Seashore neighbors, the extent of
conflict between hunters and non-hunters, and the attitudes and
behaviors of hunters at the Seashore.
DATES: Public comments will be accepted on or before March 24, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments directly to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, (OMB 1024-XXXX) Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by fax at 202-395-6566, or by
electronic mail at oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.
The OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30 days. Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive public comments within thirty days of
the date on which this notice is published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE STUDY PACKAGE SUBMITTED FOR
OMB REVIEW, CONTACT: Dr. Jim Gramann, Visiting Chief Social Scientist,
National Park Service, Social Science Program, via phone at 202-513-
7189, via fax at 202-371-2131, or via electronic mail at james_
gramann@partner.nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Titles: Cape Cod National Seashore Impacts of Hunting Survey of
Visitors and Residents.
Bureau Form Number: None.
OMB Number: To be requested.
Expiration Date: To be requested.
Type of request: New Collection.
Description of need: Because of the long standing tradition of
hunting on
[[Page 8625]]
Cape Cod, the enabling legislation of Cape Cod National Seashore in
1961 allowed for continued hunting activity within the boundaries of
the Seashore. Animal rights groups have argued that environmental and
social conditions in and around the Seashore have changed, and that
hunting should be discontinued. Public meetings about this issue have
been contentious, with the hunting community voicing strong opposition
to changes in current hunting regulations within the Seashore. Given
the polarity of the current debate, questions remain: Do area residents
and visitors object to hunting in the Seashore, are they neutral about
the issue, or do they consider it an appropriate and/or desirable use
of the area? To what extent do residents and visitors feel threatened
by hunting activities? How often do conflicts occur between hunters and
non-hunters during the fall and winter hunting seasons? And what is the
extent of hunting activity on the Seashore? This study is designed to
better understand the scope of hunting activities at the Seashore, the
degree of conflict that occurs over the practice, and how people feel
about hunting at the Seashore.
Automated data collection: At the present time, there is no
automated way to gather this information because it includes directly
contacting hunters, visitors to Cape Cod National Seashore, and
residents in the six surrounding townships.
Description of respondents: Visitors to Cape Cod National Seashore
and residents of the following townships on Cape Cod: Provincetown,
Truro, Wellfleet, Eastham, Orleans, and Chatham.
Estimated average number of respondents: 2,900.
Estimated average number of responses: 2,900.
Estimated average burden hours per response: 20 minutes.
Frequency of Response: 1 time per respondent.
Estimated annual reporting burden: 929 hours.
Dated: November 17, 2004.
Leonard E. Stowe,
Acting, National Park Service Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-3347 Filed 2-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P