Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 8640-8641 [05-3263]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
8640
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices
the worker group. Therefore, the
Department is again amending the
revised determination to reflect the
correct impact date.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–52,777 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Steelcase, Inc., Grand
Rapids, Michigan, including leased workers
of RCM Technologies working at Steelcase,
Inc., Grand Rapids, Michigan, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after August 12, 2002,
through October 14, 2005, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under section
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
February, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–685 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,216]
ITW Insulation Systems, Nitro, WV;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On January 11, 2005, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on January 21, 2005 (70 FR
3227).
The petition for the workers of ITW
Insulation Systems, Nitro, West Virginia
engaged in production of metal
jacketing and industrial thermal
insulation applications was denied
because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’
group eligibility requirement of Section
222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, was not met. The
‘‘contributed importantly’’ test is
generally demonstrated through a
survey of the workers’ firm’s customers.
The survey revealed no increase of
imports of metal jacketing an industrial
thermal insulation applications during
the relevant period. The subject firm did
not import metal jacketing and
industrial thermal insulation
applications in the relevant period nor
did it shift production to a foreign
country.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner requests to extend the period
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:10 Feb 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
for investigation beyond the relevant
time period.
A review of the original investigation
confirmed that the subject firm ceased
its production on June 30, 2004. All the
surveys and data requested from the
subject firm and its customers reflected
this date. The Department considers
import impact in terms of the relevant
period of the current investigation;
therefore import impact that is outside
the relevant period are irrelevant. The
Department must conform to the Trade
Act and associated regulations.
The petitioner further requested to
extend the survey of customers to
include those in the northeast.
Additional list of customers was
requested from the subject firm. As a
result, six additional largest customers
were surveyed in the reconsideration
process. These customers reported no
imports of like or directly competitive
products with those manufactured by
the subject firm during the relevant
period.
The petitioner also alleges that the
subject firm ‘‘will be supplying their
customer base from their facility in
Canada.’’
A company official was contacted
regarding the above allegation. The
company official stated that no
production has been shifted from the
subject firm to Canada, nor is the United
States operation importing from Canada.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
February, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05–3355 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to OMB and solicitation of
public comment.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a
submittal to OMB for review of
continued approval of information
collections under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR Part 81, Standard
Specification for Granting of Patent
Licenses.
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150—0121.
3. How often the collection is
required: Application for licenses are
submitted once. Other reports are
submitted annually or as other events
required.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
Applicants for and holders of NRC
Licenses to NRC inventions.
5. The number of annual respondents:
1.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 37 hours estimated; however,
no applications are anticipated during
the next 3 years.
7. Abstract: 10 CFR Part 81 establishes
the standard specifications for the
issuance of licenses to rights in
inventions covered by patents or patent
applications invested in the United
States, as represented by or in the
custody of the Commission and other
patents in which the Commission has
legal rights.
Submit, by April 25, 2005, comments
that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the
information collection requirements
may be directed to the NRC Clearance
Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton (T–5 F53),
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, by
telephone at 301–415–7233, or by
Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration, which is
presented below:
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of February 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 05–3263 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am]
Criterion 1:
Does the proposed amendment involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change increases the allowed
time to restore the inoperable EGLS to
operable status from 6 to 12 hours. The
proposed change does not modify any plant
equipment and does not impact any failure
modes that could lead to an accident.
Additionally, the proposed change has no
affect on the consequence of any analyzed
accident since the change does not affect the
function of any equipment credited for
accident mitigation. Based on this
discussion, the proposed amendment does
not increase the probability or consequences
of an accident previously evaluated.
Criterion 2:
Does the proposed amendment create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change increases the allowed
time to restore the inoperable EGLS to
operable status from 6 to 12 hours. It does not
modify any plant equipment and there is no
impact on the capability of existing
equipment to perform its intended functions.
No system setpoints are being modified and
no changes are being made to the method in
which plant operations are conducted. No
new failure modes are introduced by the
proposed changes. The proposed amendment
does not introduce accident initiators or
malfunctions that would cause a new or
different kind of accident. Therefore, the
proposed amendment does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated.
Criterion 3:
Does the proposed amendment involve a
significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–423]
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.;
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of
Amendment to Facility Operating
License, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is considering issuance of an
amendment to Facility Operating
License No. NPF–49 issued to the
Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 for
operation in New London County,
Connecticut.
The proposed amendment would
revise Technical Specification 3/4.3.2,
‘‘Engineered Safety Features Actuation
System Instrumentation,’’ Table 3.3–3,
extending the allowed outage time for
the Emergency Generator Load
Sequencer (EGLS) from 6 hours to 12
hours. This extension was requested to
support maintenance on the EGLS
which would correct a recently
identified failure of the automatic test
circuit for the ‘A’ EGLS.
Before issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and the Commission’s
regulations.
The Commission has made a
proposed determination that the
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration.
Pursuant to the Commission’s
regulations in Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), section
50.92, this means that operation of the
facility in accordance with the proposed
amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:10 Feb 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
The proposed change increases the allowed
time to restore the inoperable EGLS to
operable status from 6 to 12 hours. The
proposed change does not affect any of the
assumptions used in the accident analysis,
nor does it affect any operability
requirements for equipment important to
plant safety. Therefore, the proposed change
will not result in a significant reduction in
the margin of safety as defined in the Bases
for Technical Specifications covered in this
License Amendment Request.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s analysis and, based on this
review, it appears that the three
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
proposes to determine that the
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8641
The Commission is seeking public
comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be
considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of the 30-day notice period.
However, should circumstances change
during the notice period such that
failure to act in a timely way would
result, for example, in derating or
shutdown of the facility, the
Commission may issue the license
amendment before the expiration of the
30-day notice period, provided that its
final determination is that the
amendment involves no significant
hazards consideration. The final
determination will consider all public
and State comments received. Should
the Commission take this action, it will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of issuance and provide for opportunity
for a hearing after issuance. The
Commission expects that the need to
take this action will occur very
infrequently.
Written comments may be submitted
by mail to the Chief, Rules and
Directives Branch, Division of
Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, and should cite the publication
date and page number of this Federal
Register notice. Written comments may
also be delivered to Room 6D22, Two
White Flint North, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30
a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays.
Documents may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room, located at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland.
The filing of requests for hearing and
petitions for leave to intervene is
discussed below.
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, the licensee
may file a request for a hearing with
respect to issuance of the amendment to
the subject facility operating license and
any person whose interest may be
affected by this proceeding and who
wishes to participate as a party in the
proceeding must file a written request
for a hearing and a petition for leave to
intervene. Requests for a hearing and a
petition for leave to intervene shall be
filed in accordance with the
Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for
Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10
CFR Part 2. Interested persons should
consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309,
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8640-8641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3263]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information
collection request to OMB and solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a submittal to OMB for review of
continued approval of information collections under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information collection: 10 CFR Part 81,
Standard Specification for Granting of Patent Licenses.
2. Current OMB approval number: 3150--0121.
3. How often the collection is required: Application for licenses
are submitted once. Other reports are submitted annually or as other
events required.
4. Who is required or asked to report: Applicants for and holders
of NRC Licenses to NRC inventions.
5. The number of annual respondents: 1.
6. The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement
or request: 37 hours estimated; however, no applications are
anticipated during the next 3 years.
7. Abstract: 10 CFR Part 81 establishes the standard specifications
for the issuance of licenses to rights in inventions covered by patents
or patent applications invested in the United States, as represented by
or in the custody of the Commission and other patents in which the
Commission has legal rights.
Submit, by April 25, 2005, comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC
to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical
utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance
requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site: https://
www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The document
will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the information collection
requirements may be directed to the NRC Clearance Officer, Brenda Jo.
Shelton (T-5 F53),
[[Page 8641]]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by
telephone at 301-415-7233, or by Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of February 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. 05-3263 Filed 2-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
