Olives Grown in California, Increased Assessment Rate, 8545-8547 [05-3234]

Download as PDF 8545 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 34 Tuesday, February 22, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 932 [Docket No. FV05–932–1 PR] Olives Grown in California, Increased Assessment Rate Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate established for the California Olive Committee (committee) for the 2005 and subsequent fiscal years from $12.18 to $15.68 per ton of olives handled. The committee locally administers the marketing order regulating the handling of olives grown in California. Authorization to assess olive handlers enables the committee to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The fiscal year began January 1 and ends December 31. The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. DATES: Comments must be received by March 24, 2005. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http//www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel May, Marketing Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration VerDate jul<14>2003 12:40 Feb 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating the handling of olives grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with executive Order 12866. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on January 1, 2005, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the committee for the 2005 and subsequent fiscal years from $12.18 per ton to $15.68 per ton of olives. The California olive marketing order provides authority for the committee, with the approval of USDA to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the committee are producers and handlers of California olives. They are familiar with the committee’s needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. For the 2004 and subsequent fiscal years, the committee recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue in effect from fiscal year to fiscal year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the committee or other information available to USDA. The committee met on December 13, 2004, and unanimously recommended fiscal year 2005 expenditures of $1,217,014 and an assessment rate of $15.68 per ton of olives. In comparison, the expenditures for fiscal year 2004 were originally budgeted at $1,269,036. In July of 2004, the committee voted unanimously to increase the budget by $117,535 to fund a research project. The committee’s reserves were used to fund the revised budget. The revised budget for 2004 totaled $1,386,598. The proposed assessment rate of $15.68 is $3.50 higher than the $12.18 rate currently in effect. Expenditures recommended by the committee for the E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM 22FEP1 8546 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules 2005 fiscal year include $680,000 for marketing activities, $337,014 for administration, and $200,000 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004 were originally $633,500 for marketing activities, $360,563 for administration, and $225,000 for research. The revised 2004 budget provided $342,535 for research. The assessment rated recommended by the committee was derived by considering anticipated expenses (including restoration of the reserve funds allocated to the 2004 emergency research project), actual olive tonnage received by handlers, and additional pertinent factors. The California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) reported olive receipts for the 2004–05 crop year at 85,862 tons, which compares to 102,703 for the 2003–04 crop year. The reduction in the crop size for the 2004–05 crop year, due in large part to the alternate-bearing characteristics of olives, has made it necessary for the committee to recommend an increase in the assessment rate from the current $12.18 per assessable ton to $15.68 per assessable ton, an increase of $3.50 per ton. Income derived from handler assessments, interest, and utilization of reserve funds will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the maximum permitted by the order of approximately one fiscal period’s expense (§ 932.40). The assessable tonnage for the 2005 fiscal year is expected to be less than the receipts of 85,862 tons reported by CASS, because some olives may be diverted by handlers to uses that are exempt from marketing order requirements. The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite period, the committee would continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of committee meetings are available from the committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate committee recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The VerDate jul<14>2003 12:40 Feb 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 committee’s 2005 budget and those for subsequent fiscal year would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small entity orientation and compatibility. There are approximately 910 producers of olives in the production area and 3 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. Based upon information from the committee, the majority of olive producers may be classified as small entities. One of the handlers may be classified as a small entity, but the majority of the handlers may be classified as large entities. This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the committee and collected from handlers for the 2005 and subsequent fiscal years from $12.18 per ton to $15.68 per ton of olives. The committee unanimously recommended 2005 expenditures of $1,217,014 and an assessment rate of $15.68 per ton. The proposed assessment rate of $15.68 per ton is $3.50 per ton higher than the 2004 rate. The quantity of olive receipts for the 2004–05 crop year was reported by CASS to be 85,862 tons, but the actual assessable tonnage for the 2005 fiscal year is expected to be lower. This is because some of the receipts are expected to be diverted by handlers to exempt outlets on which assessments are not paid. The $15.68 per ton assessment rate should be adequate to meet this year’s expenses when combined with funds from the authorized reserve and interest income. Funds in the order of about one fiscal period’s expenses ( § 932.40). PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Expenditures recommended by the committee for the 2005 fiscal year include $680,000 for marketing development, $337,014 for administration, and $200,000 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2004 were originally $633,500 for marketing development, $360,563 for administration, and $225,000 for research. The research budget was increased to $342,535 in July 2004 to fund an additional project unanimously recommended by the committee. In 2003–04, olive receipts totaled 102,703 tons compared to the 2004–05 crop year’s tonnage of 85,862. Although the committee decreased 2005 budgeted expenses, the significant decrease in olive production makes the higher assessment rate necessary. The research expenditures will fund studies to develop chemical, biological, and cultural controls of the olive fruit fly in the California production area. The budget for market development expenditures has been increased because the committee’s marketing program for 2005 has been expanded to include nutrition and education outreach activities for wider audiences. Some of the outreach activities include cookbook contributions, school activities, and web site development. The committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2005 expenditures of $1,217,014, which reflect an increase in the market development budget and decreases in the research and administrative budgets. Prior to arriving at this budget, the committee considered information from various sources, such as the committee’s Executive Subcommittee and the Market Development Subcommittee. Alternate spending levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative value of various research and marketing projects to the olive industry and the anticipated olive production. The assessment rate of $15.68 per ton of assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the volume of assessable olives, and additional pertinent factors. A review of historical and preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal year indicates that the grower price for the 2004–05 crop year is estimated to be approximately $720 per ton for canning fruit and $276 per ton for limited-use size fruit. Approximately 85 percent of a ton of olives are canning fruit sizes and 10 percent are limiteduse sizes, leaving the balance as unusable cull fruit. Total grower revenue on 85,862 tons would then be $54,917,335 given the percentage of canning and limited-use sizes and current grower prices for those sizes. Therefore, if the assessment rate is E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM 22FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules increased from $12.18 to $15.68, the estimated assessment revenue is expected to be approximately 2.33 percent of grower revenue. This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order. In addition, the committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the California olive industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in committee deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, the December 13, 2004, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses. This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on California olive handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/ fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate because: (1) The 2005 fiscal year began on January 1, 2005, and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal year apply to all assessable olives handled during such fiscal year; (2) the committee needs sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years. VerDate jul<14>2003 12:40 Feb 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932 Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and record keeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as follows: Authority 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows: § 932.230 Assessment rate. On and after January 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $15.68 per ton is established for California olives. Dated: February 15, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–3234 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2005–20414; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–116–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328–300 Series Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: 8547 • DOT Docket Web Site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. • By Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact AvCraft Aerospace GmbH, P.O. Box 1103, D– 82230 Wessling, Germany. You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at https:// dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA–2005– 20414; the directorate identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–116–AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 2005–20414; Directorate Identifier new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 2004–NM–116–AD’’ at the beginning of Dornier Model 328–300 series airplanes. your comments. We specifically invite This proposed AD would require comments on the overall regulatory, installing an additional mounting angle economic, environmental, and energy for the respective de-icing pipes at rib aspects of the proposed AD. We will 9 in the leading edge area of the left- and consider all comments submitted by the right-hand wings. This proposed AD is closing date and may amend the prompted by chafed de-icing lines in the proposed AD in light of those wing leading edge area. We are comments. proposing this AD to prevent chafing of We will post all comments we the de-icing lines, which could result in receive, without change, to https:// a reduction in functionality of the antidms.dot.gov, including any personal ice system, and possibly reduced information you provide. We will also controllability and performance of the post a report summarizing each airplane in icing conditions. substantive verbal contact with FAA DATES: We must receive comments on personnel concerning this proposed AD. this proposed AD by March 24, 2005. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can find and read the ADDRESSES: Use one of the following comments in any of our dockets, addresses to submit comments on this including the name of the individual proposed AD. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM 22FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 22, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8545-8547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3234]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 8545]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 932

[Docket No. FV05-932-1 PR]


Olives Grown in California, Increased Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate 
established for the California Olive Committee (committee) for the 2005 
and subsequent fiscal years from $12.18 to $15.68 per ton of olives 
handled. The committee locally administers the marketing order 
regulating the handling of olives grown in California. Authorization to 
assess olive handlers enables the committee to incur expenses that are 
reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The fiscal year 
began January 1 and ends December 31. The assessment rate would remain 
in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.

DATES: Comments must be received by March 24, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, 
Marketing Order administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. 
Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page 
number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for 
public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular 
business hours, or can be viewed at: http//www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
moab.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel May, Marketing Specialist, 
California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, 
Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: 
(559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order 
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; 
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
Agreement No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR part 932), 
regulating the handling of olives grown in California, hereinafter 
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the 
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with executive Order 12866.
    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 
olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the 
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the 
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all 
assessable olives beginning on January 1, 2005, and continue until 
amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule would not preempt any 
State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the 
committee for the 2005 and subsequent fiscal years from $12.18 per ton 
to $15.68 per ton of olives.
    The California olive marketing order provides authority for the 
committee, with the approval of USDA to formulate an annual budget of 
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 
program. The members of the committee are producers and handlers of 
California olives. They are familiar with the committee's needs and 
with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus 
in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. 
The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. 
Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate 
and provide input.
    For the 2004 and subsequent fiscal years, the committee 
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue 
in effect from fiscal year to fiscal year unless modified, suspended, 
or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by 
the committee or other information available to USDA.
    The committee met on December 13, 2004, and unanimously recommended 
fiscal year 2005 expenditures of $1,217,014 and an assessment rate of 
$15.68 per ton of olives. In comparison, the expenditures for fiscal 
year 2004 were originally budgeted at $1,269,036. In July of 2004, the 
committee voted unanimously to increase the budget by $117,535 to fund 
a research project. The committee's reserves were used to fund the 
revised budget. The revised budget for 2004 totaled $1,386,598.
    The proposed assessment rate of $15.68 is $3.50 higher than the 
$12.18 rate currently in effect. Expenditures recommended by the 
committee for the

[[Page 8546]]

2005 fiscal year include $680,000 for marketing activities, $337,014 
for administration, and $200,000 for research. Budgeted expenses for 
these items in 2004 were originally $633,500 for marketing activities, 
$360,563 for administration, and $225,000 for research. The revised 
2004 budget provided $342,535 for research.
    The assessment rated recommended by the committee was derived by 
considering anticipated expenses (including restoration of the reserve 
funds allocated to the 2004 emergency research project), actual olive 
tonnage received by handlers, and additional pertinent factors. The 
California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) reported olive 
receipts for the 2004-05 crop year at 85,862 tons, which compares to 
102,703 for the 2003-04 crop year. The reduction in the crop size for 
the 2004-05 crop year, due in large part to the alternate-bearing 
characteristics of olives, has made it necessary for the committee to 
recommend an increase in the assessment rate from the current $12.18 
per assessable ton to $15.68 per assessable ton, an increase of $3.50 
per ton. Income derived from handler assessments, interest, and 
utilization of reserve funds will be adequate to cover budgeted 
expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the maximum 
permitted by the order of approximately one fiscal period's expense 
(Sec.  932.40).
    The assessable tonnage for the 2005 fiscal year is expected to be 
less than the receipts of 85,862 tons reported by CASS, because some 
olives may be diverted by handlers to uses that are exempt from 
marketing order requirements.
    The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely 
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation 
and information submitted by the Committee or other available 
information.
    Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite 
period, the committee would continue to meet prior to or during each 
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
times of committee meetings are available from the committee or USDA. 
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 
express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate committee 
recommendations and other available information to determine whether 
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would 
be undertaken as necessary. The committee's 2005 budget and those for 
subsequent fiscal year would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved 
by USDA.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
entity orientation and compatibility.
    There are approximately 910 producers of olives in the production 
area and 3 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. 
Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business 
Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts less 
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as 
those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000.
    Based upon information from the committee, the majority of olive 
producers may be classified as small entities. One of the handlers may 
be classified as a small entity, but the majority of the handlers may 
be classified as large entities.
    This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the 
committee and collected from handlers for the 2005 and subsequent 
fiscal years from $12.18 per ton to $15.68 per ton of olives. The 
committee unanimously recommended 2005 expenditures of $1,217,014 and 
an assessment rate of $15.68 per ton. The proposed assessment rate of 
$15.68 per ton is $3.50 per ton higher than the 2004 rate.
    The quantity of olive receipts for the 2004-05 crop year was 
reported by CASS to be 85,862 tons, but the actual assessable tonnage 
for the 2005 fiscal year is expected to be lower. This is because some 
of the receipts are expected to be diverted by handlers to exempt 
outlets on which assessments are not paid.
    The $15.68 per ton assessment rate should be adequate to meet this 
year's expenses when combined with funds from the authorized reserve 
and interest income. Funds in the order of about one fiscal period's 
expenses ( Sec.  932.40).
    Expenditures recommended by the committee for the 2005 fiscal year 
include $680,000 for marketing development, $337,014 for 
administration, and $200,000 for research. Budgeted expenses for these 
items in 2004 were originally $633,500 for marketing development, 
$360,563 for administration, and $225,000 for research. The research 
budget was increased to $342,535 in July 2004 to fund an additional 
project unanimously recommended by the committee.
    In 2003-04, olive receipts totaled 102,703 tons compared to the 
2004-05 crop year's tonnage of 85,862. Although the committee decreased 
2005 budgeted expenses, the significant decrease in olive production 
makes the higher assessment rate necessary.
    The research expenditures will fund studies to develop chemical, 
biological, and cultural controls of the olive fruit fly in the 
California production area. The budget for market development 
expenditures has been increased because the committee's marketing 
program for 2005 has been expanded to include nutrition and education 
outreach activities for wider audiences. Some of the outreach 
activities include cookbook contributions, school activities, and web 
site development. The committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 
2005 expenditures of $1,217,014, which reflect an increase in the 
market development budget and decreases in the research and 
administrative budgets.
    Prior to arriving at this budget, the committee considered 
information from various sources, such as the committee's Executive 
Subcommittee and the Market Development Subcommittee. Alternate 
spending levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative 
value of various research and marketing projects to the olive industry 
and the anticipated olive production. The assessment rate of $15.68 per 
ton of assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated 
expenses, the volume of assessable olives, and additional pertinent 
factors.
    A review of historical and preliminary information pertaining to 
the upcoming fiscal year indicates that the grower price for the 2004-
05 crop year is estimated to be approximately $720 per ton for canning 
fruit and $276 per ton for limited-use size fruit. Approximately 85 
percent of a ton of olives are canning fruit sizes and 10 percent are 
limited-use sizes, leaving the balance as unusable cull fruit. Total 
grower revenue on 85,862 tons would then be $54,917,335 given the 
percentage of canning and limited-use sizes and current grower prices 
for those sizes. Therefore, if the assessment rate is

[[Page 8547]]

increased from $12.18 to $15.68, the estimated assessment revenue is 
expected to be approximately 2.33 percent of grower revenue.
    This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on 
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, 
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the 
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs 
are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing 
order. In addition, the committee's meeting was widely publicized 
throughout the California olive industry and all interested persons 
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in committee 
deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, the December 
13, 2004, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested 
persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and 
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
    This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on California olive handlers. As with all 
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically 
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry 
and public sector agencies.
    USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance 
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate 
because: (1) The 2005 fiscal year began on January 1, 2005, and the 
marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal 
year apply to all assessable olives handled during such fiscal year; 
(2) the committee needs sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are 
incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this 
action which was unanimously recommended by the committee at a public 
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past 
years.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932

    Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and record keeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA

    1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

    2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  932.230  Assessment rate.

    On and after January 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $15.68 per ton 
is established for California olives.

    Dated: February 15, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-3234 Filed 2-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.