Environmental Impact Statement: Loudoun, Fauquier, Fairfax, Prince William, and Stafford Counties, VA, 8134-8135 [05-3079]
Download as PDF
8134
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 32 / Thursday, February 17, 2005 / Notices
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4,
2005.
Natalie Ogletree,
FAA General Engineer, RTCA Advisory
Committee.
[FR Doc. 05–3016 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Proposed FAA Order 8110.TVP, Type
Validation and Post-Type Validation
Procedures
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of and request for comments
on the proposed Federal Aviation
Administration Order 8110.TVP. This
proposed order defines FAA policy and
procedures in type certification and
post-type certification for imported and
exported products. We also define the
expectations, roles and, responsibilities
of the importing authority, the exporting
authority, and the applicant. We set up
specific procedures for certification
personnel working with the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and
member authorities of the joint Aviation
Authorities of Europe (JAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments on the
proposed revised Order to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Aircraft
Certification Service, Aircraft
Engineering Division, Room 815, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Gregory
A. Edwards, AIR–110. You may deliver
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Room 815, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, or electronically
submit comments to the following
Internet address: 9–AWA–AVS–AIR–
TVPOrder@faa.gov. Include in the
subject line of your message the title of
the document, ‘‘TVP Order.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory A. Edwards, Aerospace
Engineer, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, Aircraft Engineering Division,
Certification Procedures Branch, AIR–
110, Room 815, 800 Independence
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:41 Feb 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 11,
2005.
Susan J.M. Cabler,
Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–3021 Filed 2–16–05: 8:45 am]
Comments Invited
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
Telephone (202) 267–9287, Fax (202)
267–5340, or e-mail at:
greg.edwards@faa.gov
Your are invited to comment on the
draft order listed in this notice by
sending such written data, views, or
arguments to the above listed address.
Please identify ‘‘TVP Order’’ as the
subject of your comments. You may also
examine comments received on the draft
order before and after the comment
closing date at the FAA Headquarters
Building, Room 815, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591,
weekdays except Federal holidays,
between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. All
communications received on or before
the closing date will be considered by
the Director of the Aircraft Certification
Service before issuing the final Order.
Background
In the mid-1990s, the JAA and we
recognized the need to streamline the
certification and continued
airworthiness processes we apply to
imported aviation products. We
established sets of type validation and
post-type validation principles in a
letter of understanding, signed in
November 1997. These principles were
later amended in November 2001.
The European Parliament approved
legislation setting up EASA in July
2002. The new agency, which began
operating in September 2003, assumed
the certification and validation
authority previously exercised by the
individual National Aviation
Authorities. EASA recognizes existing
bilateral agreements between the United
States and European Union member
states until a single, new bilateral
agreement is negotiated between the
United States and the European Union.
Forming EASA gave everyone the
opportunity to look at the validation
and post-validation processes, to
incorporate lessons learned, and tailor
them to the new European aviation
certification system. As a result, we
streamlined the principles and extended
the scope.
How To Obtain Copies
You can get an electronic copy via the
Internet at https://www.faa.gov/
certification/aircraft/DraftDoc/
Comments.htm or by contacting the
person named in the paragraph FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement:
Loudoun, Fauquier, Fairfax, Prince
William, and Stafford Counties, VA
Federal Highway
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Highway
Administration is issuing this notice to
advise the public of its intent to
withdraw a notice of intent to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement in
cooperating with the Virginia
Department of Transportation for
potential transportation improvements
in the western portion of Northern
Virginia, between Route 7 in Loudoun
County and Interstate 95 in Stafford
County, to address growing regional
transportation needs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward S. Sundra, Senior
Environmental Specialist, Federal
Highway Administration, Post Office
Box 10249, Richmond, Virginia 23240–
0249, Telephone 804–775–3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 19, 2000, the Federal
Highway Administration published a
notice of intent in the Federal Register
(69 FR 79450, December 19, 2000) to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement in cooperation with the
Virginia Department of Transportation
for potential transportation
improvements in the western portion of
Northern Virginia. The project, more
commonly known as the Western
Transportation Corridor, was proposed
to be located between Route 7 in
Loudoun County and Interstate 95 in
Stafford County and was being
developed to address growing regional
transportation needs. However, like
many other states in the country, the
Commonwealth of Virginia has had to
deal with budgetary and fiscal priorities
brought about by the economic
recession. As a result, the Virginia
Department of Transportation stopped
development of the Western
Transportation Corridor and terminated
the consultant contract in 2003 for the
preparation of the Environmental
Impact Statement.
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 32 / Thursday, February 17, 2005 / Notices
Despite the termination of the
consultant contact, the Virginia
Department of Transportation
considered other options that might lead
to the development of the Western
Transportation Corridor. In 2004, the
Virginia Department of Transportation
put out a request to the private sector
soliciting their interest in developing
the Western Transportation Corridor.
The solicitation did not elicit any
interest, so the Virginia Department of
Transportation will not continue to
pursue the development of the Western
Transportation Corridor at this time or
the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
proposed action.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: February 8, 2005.
Edward S. Sundra,
Senior Environmental Specialist.
[FR Doc. 05–3079 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Requirements (ICRs)
abstracted below have been forwarded
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
ICRs describes the nature of the
information collections and their
expected burdens. The Federal Register
notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following
collection of information was published
on December 10, 2004 (69 FR 71869).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6292),
or Debra Steward, Office of Information
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:41 Feb 16, 2005
Jkt 205001
Technology and Productivity
Improvement, RAD–20, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6139).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Pub. L. 104–13, 2, 109 Stat. 163
(1995) (codified as revised at 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520), and its implementing
regulations, 5 CFR Part 1320, require
Federal agencies to issue two notices
seeking public comment on information
collection activities before OMB may
approve paperwork packages. 44 U.S.C.
3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5, 1320.8(d)(1),
1320.12. On December 10, 2004, FRA
published a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register soliciting comment on ICRs
that the agency was seeking OMB
approval. 69 FR 71869. FRA received no
comments after issuing this notice.
Accordingly, DOT announces that these
information collection activities have
been re-evaluated and certified under 5
CFR 1320.5(a) and forwarded to OMB
for review and approval pursuant to 5
CFR 1320.12(c).
Before OMB decides whether to
approve these proposed collections of
information, it must provide 30 days for
public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5
CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires
OMB to approve or disapprove
paperwork packages between 30 and 60
days after the 30 day notice is
published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)–(c); 5 CFR
1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30
day notice informs the regulated
community to file relevant comments
and affords the agency adequate time to
digest public comments before it
renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug.
29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to
OMB within 30 days of publication to
best ensure having their full effect. 5
CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995.
The summary below describes the
nature of the information collection
requirements (ICRs) and the expected
burden. The proposed requirements are
being submitted for clearance by OMB
as required by the PRA.
Title: Safety Integration Plans.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0557.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Railroads.
Form(s): N/A.
Abstract: The Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) and the Surface
Transportation Board (STB), working in
conjunction with each other, issued
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8135
joint final rules establishing procedures
for the development and
implementation of safety integration
plans (‘‘SIPs’’ or ‘‘plans’’) by a Class I
railroad proposing to engage in certain
specified merger, consolidation, or
acquisition of control transactions with
another Class I railroad, or a Class II
railroad with which it proposes to
amalgamate operations. The scope of the
transactions covered under the two
rules is the same. FRA will use the
information collected, notably the
required SIPs, to maintain and promote
a safe rail environment by ensuring that
affected railroads (Class Is and some
Class IIs) address critical safety issues
unique to the amalgamation of large,
complex railroad operations.
Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 528
hours.
ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding
these information collections to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 Seventeenth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, 20503, Attention: FRA
Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on the
following: Whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
Department’s estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collections;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collections of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on February 9,
2005.
Kathy A. Weiner,
Director, Office of Information Technology
and Support Systems, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–3015 Filed 2–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 32 (Thursday, February 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8134-8135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3079]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: Loudoun, Fauquier, Fairfax,
Prince William, and Stafford Counties, VA
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration is issuing this notice to
advise the public of its intent to withdraw a notice of intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in cooperating with the
Virginia Department of Transportation for potential transportation
improvements in the western portion of Northern Virginia, between Route
7 in Loudoun County and Interstate 95 in Stafford County, to address
growing regional transportation needs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward S. Sundra, Senior Environmental
Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, Post Office Box 10249,
Richmond, Virginia 23240-0249, Telephone 804-775-3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 19, 2000, the Federal Highway
Administration published a notice of intent in the Federal Register (69
FR 79450, December 19, 2000) to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Transportation
for potential transportation improvements in the western portion of
Northern Virginia. The project, more commonly known as the Western
Transportation Corridor, was proposed to be located between Route 7 in
Loudoun County and Interstate 95 in Stafford County and was being
developed to address growing regional transportation needs. However,
like many other states in the country, the Commonwealth of Virginia has
had to deal with budgetary and fiscal priorities brought about by the
economic recession. As a result, the Virginia Department of
Transportation stopped development of the Western Transportation
Corridor and terminated the consultant contract in 2003 for the
preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement.
[[Page 8135]]
Despite the termination of the consultant contact, the Virginia
Department of Transportation considered other options that might lead
to the development of the Western Transportation Corridor. In 2004, the
Virginia Department of Transportation put out a request to the private
sector soliciting their interest in developing the Western
Transportation Corridor. The solicitation did not elicit any interest,
so the Virginia Department of Transportation will not continue to
pursue the development of the Western Transportation Corridor at this
time or the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this proposed action.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: February 8, 2005.
Edward S. Sundra,
Senior Environmental Specialist.
[FR Doc. 05-3079 Filed 2-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M