Westar Energy, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings, 7928-7931 [E5-633]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7928
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Notices
The Mill C Development consists of
the following existing facilities: (1) A
43-foot-high, 202-foot-long stone
masonry dam with spillway topped
with 2-foot-high flashboards; (2) a 7.9acre reservoir; (3) a 37-foot-long, 18foot-wide intake; (4) a 11.5-foot to 10foot-diameter, 494-foot-long penstock;
(5) a 11.1-foot to 10-foot-diameter, 84foot-long penstocks; (6) one powerhouse
containing two generating units with a
total installed capacity of 2,250 kW; (7)
another powerhouse containing a single
generating unit with an installed
capacity of 3,800 kW; (8) a 700-footlong, 6.6-kV transmission line; and (9)
other appurtenances.
The Kents Falls Development consists
of the following existing facilities: (1) A
59-foot-high, 172-foot-long concrete
gravity dam with spillway topped with
3.5-foot-high flashboards; (2) a 34-acre
reservoir; (3) a 29-foot-long, 22-footwide intake; (4) an 11-foot-diameter,
2,652-foot-long penstock; (5) three 6foot-diameter, 16-foot-long penstocks;
(6) a 28-foot-diameter surge tank; (7) a
powerhouse containing two generating
units with a total installed capacity of
12,400 kW; (8) a 390-foot-long, 6.6-kV
transmission line; and (9) other
appurtenances.
m. A copy of the application is on file
with the Commission and is available
for public inspection. This filing may
also be viewed on the Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link—select ‘‘Docket #’’ and follow the
instructions. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866) 208–3676 or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659. A copy is also
available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h
above.
n. You may also register online at
https://www.ferc.gov.esubscribenow.htm
to be notified via email of new filings
and issuances related to this or other
pending projects. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support.
o. Anyone may submit a protest or a
motion to intervene in accordance with
the requirements of Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210,
385.211, and 385.214. In determining
the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests
filed, but only those who file a motion
to intervene in accordance with the
Commission’s Rules may become a
party to the proceeding. Any protests or
motions to intervene must be received
on or before the specified deadline date
for the particular application.
All filings must (1) bear in all capital
letters the title ‘‘PROTEST’’ or
‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE;’’ (2) set
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:54 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the
application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address,
and telephone number of the person
protesting or intervening; and (4)
otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005.
Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant.
A copy of any protest or motion to
intervene must be served upon each
representative of the applicant specified
in the particular application.
p. Procedural Schedule and Final
Amendments: The application will be
processed according to the following
Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to
the schedule will be made as
appropriate. The Commission staff
proposes to issue one environmental
assessment rather than issue a draft and
final EA. Comments, terms and
conditions, recommendations,
prescriptions, and reply comments, if
any, will be addressed in an EA. Staff
intents to give at least 30 days for
entities to comment on the EA, and will
take into consideration all comments
received on the EA before final action is
taken on the license application.
Issue Scoping Document—February
2005
Notice application ready for
environmental analysis—April 2005
Notice of the availability of the EA—
August 2005
Ready for Commission decision on the
application—December 2005
Final amendments to the application
must be filed with the Commission no
later than 30 days from the issuance
date of the notice of ready for
environmental analysis.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–644 Filed 2–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. ER02–2516–003, et al.]
1. Westar Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. ER02–2516–003]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar) tendered
for filing First Revised Sheet Nos. 5 and
5 as part of its First Revised FERC
Electric Rate Schedule No. 227, between
Westar and the City of Axtell, Kansas
(Axtell). Westar states that the purpose
of this filing is to remove an unexecuted
second amendment that was never
agreed to by Westar and Axtell and that
never went into effect, which was
erroneously filed with the Commission.
Westar states that copies of the filing
were served upon the City of Axtell,
Kansas and the Kansas Corporation
Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
2. Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER03–86–009, ER03–83–008]
Take notice that on February 4, 2004,
the Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO)
submitted an amendment to its January
8, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER03–86–
008 and ER03–83–007 regarding
proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO
Open Access Transmission Tariff
(OATT) to remove all TRANSLink
references from the OATT in
compliance to the Commission’s order
issued December 29, 2004, Midwest
Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc. 109 FERC 61,374 (2004).
The Midwest ISO requests an effective
date of October 30, 2004.
The Midwest ISO states that it has
electronically served a copy of this
filing, with attachments, upon all
Midwest ISO Members, Member
representatives of Transmission Owners
and Non-Transmission Owners, the
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee
participants, as well as all State
commissions within the region. In
addition, the Midwest ISO states that
the filing has been electronically posted
on the Midwest ISO’s Web site at
https://www.midwestiso.org under the
heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for other
interested parties in this matter and that
it will provide hard copies to any
interested parties upon request.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Westar Energy, Inc., et al.; Electric
Rate and Corporate Filings
3. New York Independent System
Operator, Inc.
February 9, 2005.
[Docket No. ER03–836–006]
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
Take notice that on January 14, 2005,
New York Independent System
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) submitted a
motion to temporarily defer the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Notices
schedule set forth in its July 6, 2004
compliance filing in Docket No. ER03–
486–004 for the implementation of a
non-bid based self-supply option for
Operating Reserve.
NYISO states that it has served a copy
of the filing on all parties on the official
service list in this proceeding, including
the New York Public Service
Commission, and to the electric utility
regulatory agencies in New Jersey and
Pennsylvania.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 22, 2005.
4. FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC
[Docket No. ER03–1333–002]
Take notice that, on February 4, 2005,
FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC
submitted a compliance filing pursuant
to the Commission order issued
November 17, 2003, in Docket No.
EL01–118–000, et al. Investigation of
Terms and Conditions of Public Utility
Market-Based Rate Authorizations, 105
FERC ¶ 61,218 (2003). FPL Energy
Sooner Wind, LLC states that it is
amending its market-based rate tariff to
include the market behavior rules.
FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC states
that copies of the filing were served on
parties on the official service list in the
above-captioned proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
5. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. ER04–539–007]
Take notice that, on February 4, 2005,
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM)
submitted its responses to the
Commission’s deficiency letter issued
January 5, 2005 in Docket No. ER04–
539–006, amending PJM’s filings of
October 26, 2004 and December 6, 2004
in Docket No. ER04–539–006.
PJM states that copies of the filing
were served on parties on the official
service list in this proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
6. Mitchell Electric Membership
Corporation
[Docket No. ER05–350–001]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
Mitchell Electric Membership
Corporation (Mitchell) tendered for
filing additional information to
supplement its petition for acceptance
of initial rate schedule, waivers and
blanket authority filed on December 16,
2004 in Docket No. ER05–350–000.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:44 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
7. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–540–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
(Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions
to its Market Based Power Sales and
Resale Transmission Tariff, FERC
Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 8.
Wisconsin Electric states that the
changes would permit it to sell power
into the Midwest Independent System
Operator’s (Midwest ISO) Day 2 Energy
Market at market-based rates in the
region described in Wisconsin Electric’s
Tariff as the ‘‘Restricted Area.’’
Wisconsin Electric requests an effective
date concurrent with the
commencement of the Midwest ISO’s
Day 2 Energy Market, now scheduled to
occur on April 1, 2005.
Wisconsin Electric states that copies
of the filing were served on all of its
customers under the Market Rate Tariff,
as well as the regulatory bodies in
Wisconsin and Michigan.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
8. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–541–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 13 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Deerfield No. 3 Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
9. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–542–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 19 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Searsburg Station, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7929
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
10. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–543–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 10 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Bellow Falls Project, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
11. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–544–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 11 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Comerford Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
12. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–545–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 21 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Vernon Station, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
7930
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Notices
16. New England Power Company
19. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–549–000]
[Docket No. ER05–552–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 15 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Deerfield No. 5 Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 16 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Harriman Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
17. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–553–000]
14. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–550–000]
[Docket No. ER05–547–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 12 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Deerfield No. 2 Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 17 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
McIndoes Falls Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
13. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–546–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 18 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Moore Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 14 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Deerfield No. 4 Development, a hydroelectric generating unit, to NEP’s
transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
15. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–551–000]
[Docket No. ER05–548–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 20 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Sherman Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:44 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
18. New England Power Company
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
New England Power Company (NEP)
submitted for filing an Interconnection
Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc.
(TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 22 under ISO
New England Inc.’s FERC Electric Tariff
No. 3. NEP states that the agreement
concerns the interconnection of the
Wilder Project, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP’s transmission
system.
NEP states that copies of the filing
have been served on TransCanada, ISO
New England, Inc. and applicable State
regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20. New England Power Company
21. PacifiCorp
[Docket No. ER05–554–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
PacifiCorp tendered for filing
Generation Interconnection Agreements
between PacifiCorp and Roseburg Forest
Products Inc.; TDY Industries, Inc., a
California corporation d/b/a Wah
Chang; and Warm Springs Power
Enterprises. PacifiCorp also filed a
Transmission Service Agreement
between PacifiCorp and Warm Springs
Power Enterprises.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
22. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
[Docket No. ER05–556–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
(Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions
to its Market-Based Power Sales and
Resale Transmission Tariff, Wisconsin
Electric’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Notices
Volume No. 8 which reflect
administrative updates, including the
fact that Wisconsin Electric is no longer
a transmission provider. Wisconsin
Electric requests an effective date of
April 5, 2005.
Wisconsin Electric states that copies
of the filing were served on all of its
customers under the Market Rate Tariff,
as well as the regulatory bodies in
Wisconsin and Michigan.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
23. Grant Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. ER05–557–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
Grant Energy, Inc. (Grant) filed an
application for authorization to sell
energy, capacity and ancillary services
at market-based rates. Grant states that
it intends to engage in wholesale
electric power and energy purchases
and sales as a marketer and is not in the
business of generating or transmitting
electric power. Grant requests an
effective date of March 1, 2005.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
24. People’s Electric Cooperative
[Docket No. ER05–558–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
People’s Electric Cooperative (People’s)
submitted an amendment to its Rate
Schedule No. 1 for service to Chickasaw
Tribal Utility Authority (CTUA) to add
a new delivery point for service to
CTUA.
People’s states that a copy of the filing
was served on CTUA and the Oklahoma
Corporation Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
25. United States Department of Energy,
Bonneville Power Administrative
[Docket No. NJ05–2–000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005,
the United States Department of Energy,
Bonneville Power Administration
(Bonneville) submitted new tariff sheets
to incorporate into its Open Access
Transmission Tariff the Large Generator
Interconnection Procedures and Large
Generator Interconnection Agreement,
as set forth in the Commission’s Order
No. 2003, Standardization of Generator
Interconnection Agreements and
Procedures, 104 FERC ¶ 61,103 (2003)
and Order No. 2003–A, Standardization
of Generator Interconnection
Agreements and Procedures, 106 FERC
¶ 61,220 (2004). Bonneville also
submitted Revised Tariff Sheet Nos.
133–135 to amend its existing
Interconnection Procedures so that they
do not apply to generation
interconnections.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:44 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Bonneville states that an electronic
copy of the filing has been sent to all of
its transmission customers and has been
posted on the Bonneville Transmission
Business Line’s Web site.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on February 25, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–633 Filed 2–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
7931
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP05–45–000]
TransColorado Gas Transmission
Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare
an Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed North Expansion Project
And Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues
February 9, 2005.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
the North Expansion Project involving
construction and operation of facilities
by TransColorado Gas Transmission
Company (TransColorado) in Rio Blanco
County and Mesa County, Colorado.1
These facilities would consist of about
2,200 feet of 24-inch diameter pipeline,
4,670 horsepower (hp) ISO-rated of
compression, and meter replacements.
This EA will be used by the
Commission in its decision-making
process to determine whether the
project is in the public convenience and
necessity.
The FERC will be the lead federal
agency for the preparation of the EA.
The document will satisfy the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
has also agreed to participate as a
cooperating agency in the preparation of
the EA to satisfy its NEPA
responsibilities. It is the goal of the
FERC and the BLM to avoid duplication
of effort and prepare a single EA that
can be used to satisfy their NEPA
responsibilities.
Summary of the Proposed Project
TransColorado proposes to:
• Construct and operate a new
Greasewood Compressor Station, in Rio
Blanco County, Colorado, comprised of
two 1,000 hp compressor units and one
2,061 hp compressor unit;
• Construct about 2,200 feet of 24inch diameter pipeline and one 12-inch
bidirectional turbine meter on the
discharge side of the proposed
Greasewood Compressor Station; and
• Replace two existing 10-inch orifice
meters with two new 12-inch turbine
meters at the Raccoon Hollow Meter
Station in Mesa County, Colorado.
Also, TransColorado indicates it
would construct and operate, under
1 TransColorado’s application was filed with the
Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act
and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7928-7931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-633]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER02-2516-003, et al.]
Westar Energy, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
February 9, 2005.
The following filings have been made with the Commission. The
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket
classification.
1. Westar Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. ER02-2516-003]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar)
tendered for filing First Revised Sheet Nos. 5 and 5 as part of its
First Revised FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 227, between Westar and
the City of Axtell, Kansas (Axtell). Westar states that the purpose of
this filing is to remove an unexecuted second amendment that was never
agreed to by Westar and Axtell and that never went into effect, which
was erroneously filed with the Commission.
Westar states that copies of the filing were served upon the City
of Axtell, Kansas and the Kansas Corporation Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
2. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER03-86-009, ER03-83-008]
Take notice that on February 4, 2004, the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted an amendment
to its January 8, 2005 filing in Docket Nos. ER03-86-008 and ER03-83-
007 regarding proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Open Access
Transmission Tariff (OATT) to remove all TRANSLink references from the
OATT in compliance to the Commission's order issued December 29, 2004,
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. 109 FERC 61,374
(2004). The Midwest ISO requests an effective date of October 30, 2004.
The Midwest ISO states that it has electronically served a copy of
this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member
representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-Transmission Owners, the
Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, as well as all State
commissions within the region. In addition, the Midwest ISO states that
the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site
at https://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for
other interested parties in this matter and that it will provide hard
copies to any interested parties upon request.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
3. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
[Docket No. ER03-836-006]
Take notice that on January 14, 2005, New York Independent System
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) submitted a motion to temporarily defer the
[[Page 7929]]
schedule set forth in its July 6, 2004 compliance filing in Docket No.
ER03-486-004 for the implementation of a non-bid based self-supply
option for Operating Reserve.
NYISO states that it has served a copy of the filing on all parties
on the official service list in this proceeding, including the New York
Public Service Commission, and to the electric utility regulatory
agencies in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2005.
4. FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC
[Docket No. ER03-1333-002]
Take notice that, on February 4, 2005, FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission order issued
November 17, 2003, in Docket No. EL01-118-000, et al. Investigation of
Terms and Conditions of Public Utility Market-Based Rate
Authorizations, 105 FERC ] 61,218 (2003). FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC
states that it is amending its market-based rate tariff to include the
market behavior rules.
FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC states that copies of the filing were
served on parties on the official service list in the above-captioned
proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
5. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. ER04-539-007]
Take notice that, on February 4, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
(PJM) submitted its responses to the Commission's deficiency letter
issued January 5, 2005 in Docket No. ER04-539-006, amending PJM's
filings of October 26, 2004 and December 6, 2004 in Docket No. ER04-
539-006.
PJM states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the
official service list in this proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
6. Mitchell Electric Membership Corporation
[Docket No. ER05-350-001]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Mitchell Electric Membership
Corporation (Mitchell) tendered for filing additional information to
supplement its petition for acceptance of initial rate schedule,
waivers and blanket authority filed on December 16, 2004 in Docket No.
ER05-350-000.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
7. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-540-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power
Company (Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions to its Market Based
Power Sales and Resale Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Volume No. 8. Wisconsin Electric states that the changes would
permit it to sell power into the Midwest Independent System Operator's
(Midwest ISO) Day 2 Energy Market at market-based rates in the region
described in Wisconsin Electric's Tariff as the ``Restricted Area.''
Wisconsin Electric requests an effective date concurrent with the
commencement of the Midwest ISO's Day 2 Energy Market, now scheduled to
occur on April 1, 2005.
Wisconsin Electric states that copies of the filing were served on
all of its customers under the Market Rate Tariff, as well as the
regulatory bodies in Wisconsin and Michigan.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
8. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-541-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 13 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 3 Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
9. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-542-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 19 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Searsburg Station, a hydro-electric generating
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
10. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-543-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 10 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Bellow Falls Project, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
11. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-544-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 11 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Comerford Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
12. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-545-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 21 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Vernon Station, a hydro-electric generating
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
[[Page 7930]]
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
13. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-546-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 18 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Moore Development, a hydro-electric generating
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
14. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-547-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 14 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 4 Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
15. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-548-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 20 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Sherman Development, a hydro-electric generating
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
16. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-549-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 15 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 5 Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
17. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-550-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 12 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Deerfield No. 2 Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
18. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-551-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 22 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Wilder Project, a hydro-electric generating
unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
19. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-552-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 16 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the Harriman Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
20. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-553-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, New England Power Company
(NEP) submitted for filing an Interconnection Agreement between NEP and
TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. (TransCanada), designated as Original
Service Agreement No. 17 under ISO New England Inc.'s FERC Electric
Tariff No. 3. NEP states that the agreement concerns the
interconnection of the McIndoes Falls Development, a hydro-electric
generating unit, to NEP's transmission system.
NEP states that copies of the filing have been served on
TransCanada, ISO New England, Inc. and applicable State regulators.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
21. PacifiCorp
[Docket No. ER05-554-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, PacifiCorp tendered for
filing Generation Interconnection Agreements between PacifiCorp and
Roseburg Forest Products Inc.; TDY Industries, Inc., a California
corporation d/b/a Wah Chang; and Warm Springs Power Enterprises.
PacifiCorp also filed a Transmission Service Agreement between
PacifiCorp and Warm Springs Power Enterprises.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
22. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
[Docket No. ER05-556-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Wisconsin Electric Power
Company (Wisconsin Electric) submitted revisions to its Market-Based
Power Sales and Resale Transmission Tariff, Wisconsin Electric's FERC
Electric Tariff, Original
[[Page 7931]]
Volume No. 8 which reflect administrative updates, including the fact
that Wisconsin Electric is no longer a transmission provider. Wisconsin
Electric requests an effective date of April 5, 2005.
Wisconsin Electric states that copies of the filing were served on
all of its customers under the Market Rate Tariff, as well as the
regulatory bodies in Wisconsin and Michigan.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
23. Grant Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. ER05-557-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, Grant Energy, Inc. (Grant)
filed an application for authorization to sell energy, capacity and
ancillary services at market-based rates. Grant states that it intends
to engage in wholesale electric power and energy purchases and sales as
a marketer and is not in the business of generating or transmitting
electric power. Grant requests an effective date of March 1, 2005.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
24. People's Electric Cooperative
[Docket No. ER05-558-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, People's Electric Cooperative
(People's) submitted an amendment to its Rate Schedule No. 1 for
service to Chickasaw Tribal Utility Authority (CTUA) to add a new
delivery point for service to CTUA.
People's states that a copy of the filing was served on CTUA and
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
25. United States Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administrative
[Docket No. NJ05-2-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 2005, the United States Department
of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) submitted new
tariff sheets to incorporate into its Open Access Transmission Tariff
the Large Generator Interconnection Procedures and Large Generator
Interconnection Agreement, as set forth in the Commission's Order No.
2003, Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and
Procedures, 104 FERC ] 61,103 (2003) and Order No. 2003-A,
Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures,
106 FERC ] 61,220 (2004). Bonneville also submitted Revised Tariff
Sheet Nos. 133-135 to amend its existing Interconnection Procedures so
that they do not apply to generation interconnections.
Bonneville states that an electronic copy of the filing has been
sent to all of its transmission customers and has been posted on the
Bonneville Transmission Business Line's Web site.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 25, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-633 Filed 2-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
