Glyphosate; Pesticide Tolerance, 7861-7864 [05-2983]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
Dated: February 7, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
IX. Congressional Review Act
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate jul<14>2003
10:50 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.561 is amended by
adding text to paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
I
§ 180.561 Acibenzolar-S-methyl;
tolerances for residues.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.
Time-limited tolerances are established
for residues of acibenzolar-S-methyl,
benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic
acid-S-methyl ester in connection with
use of the pesticide under section 18
emergency exemptions granted by EPA.
The time-limited tolerances will expire
and are revoked on the date specified in
the following table:
Parts per
million
Commodity
Onion, dry bulb
Onion, green .....
*
*
*
Expiration/
revocation
date
0.05
0.05
*
6/30/07
6/30/07
*
[FR Doc. 05–2897 Filed 2–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
7861
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0021. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at http:/
/www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Tompkins, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–5697; e-mail address:
tompkins.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0021; FRL–7697–7]
Glyphosate; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of glyphosate, N(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting
from the application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate in or on
alfalfa, seed. Monsanto Company
requested this tolerance under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 16, 2005. Objections and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g.,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS 112),
e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS 311),
e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
7862
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (http:/
/www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/. To access the
OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines
referenced in this document, go directly
to the guidelines athttps://www.epa.gpo/
opptsfrs/home/guidelin.htm/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of August 18,
2004 (69 FR 51301) (FRL–7364–5), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 2F6487) by
Monsanto Company, 600 13th Street,
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.364 be amended by establishing a
tolerance for residues of the herbicide
glyphosate, N-phosphonomethyl
glycine, in or on alfalfa, seed at 0.5 parts
per million (ppm). That notice included
a summary of the petition prepared by
Monsanto Company, the registrant.
There was one comment received in
response to this notice of filing from B.
Sachau, 15 Elm Street, Florham, NJ
07932. The commentor objected to
allowing any tolerance, waiver, or
exemption for glyphosate. The
commentor also objected to animal
testing and stated that a more reliable
method of testing should be developed.
This comment is further discussed and
addressed in the Final Rule which
published in the Federal Register of
November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65081) (FRL–
7683–9).
During the course of the review the
Agency decided to correct the company
address to read: Monsanto Company,
1300 I St., NW., Suite 450 East,
Washington DC 20005.
The Agency is also correcting the
proposed tolerance expression to agree
with the current expression by
VerDate jul<14>2003
10:50 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
including references to the salts.
Therefore, the tolerance expression is
corrected to read: A tolerance is
established for residues of glyphosate,
(N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting
from the application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate in or on
alfalfa, seed at 0.5 parts per million
(ppm).
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. For
further discussion of the regulatory
requirements of section 408 of FFDCA
and a complete description of the risk
assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR
62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL–5754–
7).
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess
the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of
FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of
glyphosate, (N(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting
from the application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate on alfalfa,
seed at 0.5 ppm. EPA’s assessment of
exposures and risks associated with
establishing the tolerance were
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
discussed in the Final Rule published in
the Federal Register of November 10,
2004 (69 FR 65081) which established
tolerances for residues of glyphosate in
or on cotton, gin byproducts and cotton,
undelinted seed. Based on the risk
assessments discussed in the above
notice, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, and to
infants and children from aggregrate
exposure to glyphosate residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate analytical methods are
available for the enforcement of
tolerances for glyphosate in plant and
livestock commodities. These methods
include gas liquid chromatography
(GLC) (Method I in Pesticides Analytical
Manual (PAM II)) and high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) with
fluorometric detection. Use of GLC is
discouraged due to the lengthliness of
the experimental procedure. The HPLC
procedure has undergone successful
Agency validation and was
recommended for inclusion into PAM II.
A gas chromatography spectrometry
(GC/MS) for glyphosate in crops has
also been validated by EPA.
These methods may be requested from
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number (410) 305–2905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
Codex and Mexican maximum
residue levels (MRLS) are established
for residues of glyphosate per se and
Canadian MRLs are established for the
combined residues of glyphosate and
aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)
on a variety of raw agricultural
commodities.
Currently no Codex, Mexican, or
Canadian MRLs are established for
alfalfa, seed.
There are no conditions of registration
for the establishment of tolerances on
alfalfa, seed.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established
for residues of glyphosate, N(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting
from the application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate, in or on
alfalfa, seed at 0.5 ppm.
VI. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as
amended by FQPA, any person may file
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to
reflect the amendments made to FFDCA
by FQPA, EPA will continue to use
those procedures, with appropriate
adjustments, until the necessary
modifications can be made. The new
section 408(g) of FFDCA provides
essentially the same process for persons
to ‘‘object’’ to a regulation for an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance issued by EPA under new
section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was
provided in the old sections 408 and
409 of FFDCA. However, the period for
filing objections is now 60 days, rather
than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an
Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part
178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
you must identify docket ID number
OPP–2005–0021 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before April 18, 2005.
1. Filing the request. Your objection
must specify the specific provisions in
the regulation that you object to, and the
grounds for the objections (40 CFR
178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of
the factual issues(s) on which a hearing
is requested, the requestor’s contentions
on such issues, and a summary of any
evidence relied upon by the objector (40
CFR 178.27). Information submitted in
connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by
marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public record. Information not marked
confidential may be disclosed publicly
by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of
the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. You may also deliver
your request to the Office of the Hearing
Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of
the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m.
VerDate jul<14>2003
10:50 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Office of the Hearing
Clerk is (202) 564–6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition
to filing an objection or hearing request
with the Hearing Clerk as described in
Unit VI.A., you should also send a copy
of your request to the PIRIB for its
inclusion in the official record that is
described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by docket ID number
OPP–2005–0021 to: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch,
Information Resources and Services
Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001. In person
or by courier, bring a copy to the
location of the PIRIB described in
ADDRESSES. You may also send an
electronic copy of your request via email to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use
an ASCII file format and avoid the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic
objections and hearing requests will also
be accepted on disks in WordPerfect
6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format. Do not
include any CBI in your electronic copy.
You may also submit an electronic copy
of your request at many Federal
Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a
Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted
if the Administrator determines that the
material submitted shows the following:
There is a genuine and substantial issue
of fact; there is a reasonable possibility
that available evidence identified by the
requestor would, if established resolve
one or more of such issues in favor of
the requestor, taking into account
uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual
issues(s) in the manner sought by the
requestor would be adequate to justify
the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7863
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
7864
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 7, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
VerDate jul<14>2003
10:50 Feb 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
I 1. The authority citation for part 180
detailed instructions as provided in
continues to read as follows:
Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
docket for this action under docket
I 2. Section 180.364 is amended by
identification (ID) number OPP–2004–
alphabetically adding the commodity
‘‘Alfalfa, seed’’ to the table in paragraph 0324. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at http:/
(a) to read as follows:
/www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
§ 180.364 Glyphosate; tolerances for
in the index, some information is not
residues.
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
(a) * * *
restricted by statute. Certain other
Commodity
Parts per million
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
*
*
*
*
*
publicly available only in hard copy
Alfalfa, seed ....................
0.5
form. Publicly available docket
*
*
*
*
*
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
*
*
*
*
*
copy at the Public Information and
[FR Doc. 05–2983 Filed 2–15–05; 8:45 am]
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
through Friday, excluding legal
AGENCY
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
40 CFR Part 180
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Tompkins, Registration
[OPP–2004–0324; FRL–7694–4]
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Quizalofop-ethyl; Pesticide Tolerance
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
number: (703) 305–5697; e-mail
Agency (EPA).
address:tompkins.jim@epa.gov.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
I. General Information
tolerance for combined residues of
quizalofop (2-[4-(6-chloroquinoxalin-2A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
yl oxy)phenoxy]propanoic acid) and
You may be potentially affected by
quizalofop ethyl (ethyl-2-[4-(6this action if you are an agricultural
chloroquinoxalin-2-yl
producer, food manufacturer, or
oxy)phenoxy]propanoate, all expressed
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
as quizalofop ethyl in or on bean, dry;
affected entities may include, but are
bean, succulent; beet, sugar, roots; beet,
not limited to:
sugar, tops; cowpea, forage; cowpea,
• Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g.,
hay; peas, dry; pea, field, hay; pea, field,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
vines; and pea, succulent. Also a
nursery, and floriculture workers;
tolerance for the combined residues of
quizalofop-p-ethyl ester (ethyl (R)-(2-(4- farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS 112),
((6-chloroquinoxalin-2e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
yl)oxy)phenoxy)propanoate) and its acid
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
metabolite quizalofop-p (R-(2-(4-((6• Food manufacturing (NAICS 311),
chloroquinoxalin-2e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
yl)oxy)phenoxy)propanoic acid)), and
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
the S enantiomers of both the ester and
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
the acid, all expressed as quizalofop-p• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
ethyl ester is established for beet, sugar, 32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
molasses. E. I. DuPont de Nemours and
commercial applicators; farmers;
Company requested this tolerance under greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
workers; residential users.
Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food
This listing is not intended to be
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
DATES: This regulation is effective
for readers regarding entities likely to be
February 16, 2005. Objections and
affected by this action. Other types of
requests for hearings must be received
entities not listed in this unit could also
on or before April 18, 2005.
be affected. The North American
PART 180—[AMENDED]
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 16, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7861-7864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2983]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2005-0021; FRL-7697-7]
Glyphosate; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of
glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting from the application
of glyphosate, the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the ethanolamine
salt of glyphosate, the ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the potassium
salt of glyphosate in or on alfalfa, seed. Monsanto Company requested
this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective February 16, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP-2005-0021. All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S.
Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Tompkins, Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5697; e-mail address:
tompkins.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of
[[Page 7862]]
entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North
American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been
provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action
might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
To access the OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines referenced in this document,
go directly to the guidelines athttps://www.epa.gpo/opptsfrs/home/
guidelin.htm/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of August 18, 2004 (69 FR 51301) (FRL-7364-
5), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
2F6487) by Monsanto Company, 600 13th Street, NW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20005. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.364 be
amended by establishing a tolerance for residues of the herbicide
glyphosate, N-phosphonomethyl glycine, in or on alfalfa, seed at 0.5
parts per million (ppm). That notice included a summary of the petition
prepared by Monsanto Company, the registrant. There was one comment
received in response to this notice of filing from B. Sachau, 15 Elm
Street, Florham, NJ 07932. The commentor objected to allowing any
tolerance, waiver, or exemption for glyphosate. The commentor also
objected to animal testing and stated that a more reliable method of
testing should be developed. This comment is further discussed and
addressed in the Final Rule which published in the Federal Register of
November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65081) (FRL-7683-9).
During the course of the review the Agency decided to correct the
company address to read: Monsanto Company, 1300 I St., NW., Suite 450
East, Washington DC 20005.
The Agency is also correcting the proposed tolerance expression to
agree with the current expression by including references to the salts.
Therefore, the tolerance expression is corrected to read: A tolerance
is established for residues of glyphosate, (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine,
resulting from the application of glyphosate, the isopropylamine salt
of glyphosate, the ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the ammonium salt
of glyphosate, and the potassium salt of glyphosate in or on alfalfa,
seed at 0.5 parts per million (ppm).
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-
5754-7).
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of glyphosate, (N-
(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting from the application of glyphosate,
the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the ethanolamine salt of
glyphosate, the ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the potassium salt of
glyphosate on alfalfa, seed at 0.5 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures
and risks associated with establishing the tolerance were discussed in
the Final Rule published in the Federal Register of November 10, 2004
(69 FR 65081) which established tolerances for residues of glyphosate
in or on cotton, gin byproducts and cotton, undelinted seed. Based on
the risk assessments discussed in the above notice, EPA concludes that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, and to infants and children from aggregrate exposure to
glyphosate residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate analytical methods are available for the enforcement of
tolerances for glyphosate in plant and livestock commodities. These
methods include gas liquid chromatography (GLC) (Method I in Pesticides
Analytical Manual (PAM II)) and high performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) with fluorometric detection. Use of GLC is discouraged due to
the lengthliness of the experimental procedure. The HPLC procedure has
undergone successful Agency validation and was recommended for
inclusion into PAM II. A gas chromatography spectrometry (GC/MS) for
glyphosate in crops has also been validated by EPA.
These methods may be requested from Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number (410) 305-2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
Codex and Mexican maximum residue levels (MRLS) are established for
residues of glyphosate per se and Canadian MRLs are established for the
combined residues of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)
on a variety of raw agricultural commodities.
Currently no Codex, Mexican, or Canadian MRLs are established for
alfalfa, seed.
There are no conditions of registration for the establishment of
tolerances on alfalfa, seed.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of glyphosate,
N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, resulting from the application of
glyphosate, the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the ethanolamine
salt of glyphosate, the ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the potassium
salt of glyphosate, in or on alfalfa, seed at 0.5 ppm.
VI. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file
[[Page 7863]]
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require
some modification to reflect the amendments made to FFDCA by FQPA, EPA
will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments,
until the necessary modifications can be made. The new section 408(g)
of FFDCA provides essentially the same process for persons to
``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was
provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. However, the period
for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2005-0021 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before April 18,
2005.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564-6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A., you
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion
in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by docket ID number OPP-2005-0021 to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the
PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an electronic copy of
your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII
file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format.
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a
petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of
[[Page 7864]]
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This
final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 7, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.364 is amended by alphabetically adding the commodity
``Alfalfa, seed'' to the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.364 Glyphosate; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Alfalfa, seed........................................ 0.5
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-2983 Filed 2-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S