Housing Application Packaging Grants, 7650-7651 [05-2903]
Download as PDF
7650
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
to meet primary market needs. Further,
the Board, at a later date, can
recommend a release of the reserve to
provide more tart cherries to satisfy
market needs as may be necessary.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on the
comment received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab/html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board, and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already
shipping cherries from the 2004–2005
crop. Further, handlers are aware of this
rule, which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a thirty-day
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule, and the comment
received has been addressed herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tart
cherries.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is amended as
follows:
PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN
IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON,
UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND
WISCONSIN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part
930 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 930.254 is added to read as
follows:
I
Note: This section will not appear in the
annual Code of Federal Regulations.
§ 930.254 Final free and restricted
percentages for the 2004–2005 crop year.
The final percentages for tart cherries
handled by handlers during the crop
year beginning on July 1, 2004, which
shall be free and restricted, respectively,
are designated as follows: Free
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:53 Feb 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
percentage, 72 percent and restricted
percentage, 28 percent.
Dated: February 8, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–2879 Filed 2–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 1944
Housing Application Packaging Grants
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Agency is revising its
internal Housing Application Packaging
Grants regulation in order to correct an
erroneous reference to the debarment
and suspension regulation. This action
is necessary since the existing
regulation does not accurately reflect
the current information. The intended
effect is to remove the incorrect
reference to the regulation.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective February 15, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas P. Dickson, Program Analyst,
Program Support Staff, Rural
Development, Room 6900 South
Building, Stop 0761, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250–1570. Telephone: (202) 690–
4492, FAX: (202) 690–4335, e-mail:
thomas.dickson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This action is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12866
since it involves only internal Agency
management. This action is not
published for prior notice and comment
under the Administrative Procedure Act
since it involves only internal Agency
management and publication for
comment is unnecessary and contrary to
the public interest.
Program Affected
The program affected is listed in
catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under 10.442—Housing Application
Packaging Grants.
Intergovernmental Consultation
Programs with Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance the number 10.442
are not subject to the provisions of
Executive Order 12372.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. In accordance with this
rule: (1) Unless otherwise specifically
provided, all State and local laws and
regulations that are in conflict with this
rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule except as specifically prescribed in
the rule; and (3) administrative Division
(7 CFR part 11) must be exhausted
before litigation against the Department
is instituted.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapter 35
and were assigned OMB control number
0575–0157 in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. No
person is required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
This rule does not impose any new
information collection requirements
from those approved by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Administrator of the Rural
Housing Service has determined that
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.). New provisions included in
this rule will not impact a substantial
number of small entities to a greater
extent than large entities. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
performed.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Agencies generally must prepare a
written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
agencies to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly,
more cost-effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. This rule contains no
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Thus, the rule is not
subject to the requirements of section
202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’
The Agencies have determined that this
final action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of human environment, and in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an Environmental
Impact Statement is not required.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments.
Therefore, consultation with the States
is not required.
Background
In November 2003, the Federal
Register published a Final Rule that
implemented changes to the
governmentwide nonprocurment
debarment and suspension common
rule (NCR) and the associated rule on
drug-free workplace requirements. The
NCR set forth the common policies and
procedures that Federal Executive
branch agencies must use in taking
suspension or debarment actions. It also
established procedures for participants
and Federal agencies in entering
covered transactions. Following the
procedures set forth in the NCR will
help ensure that the agency action
complies with due process standards
and provides the public with uniform
procedures.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1944
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs, Housing
and community development, Loan
Programs, Migrant labor, Nonprofit
organizations, Reporting requirements,
Rural Housing.
For the reasons set forth in the
summary, chapter XVIII, title 7, Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:11 Feb 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
PART 1944—HOUSING
1. The authority citation for part 3550
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart B—Housing Application
Packaging Grants
2. Section 1944.74 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 1944.74
Debarment or Suspension.
Certified packagers whose actions or
acts warrant they not be allowed to
participate in the program are to be
investigated in accordance with agency
procedures (available in any Rural
Development office).
Dated: January 18, 2005.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 05–2903 Filed 2–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4022 and 4044
Benefits Payable in Terminated SingleEmployer Plans; Allocation of Assets
in Single-Employer Plans; Interest
Assumptions for Valuing and Paying
Benefits
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation’s regulations on Benefits
Payable in Terminated Single-Employer
Plans and Allocation of Assets in
Single-Employer Plans prescribe interest
assumptions for valuing and paying
benefits under terminating singleemployer plans. This final rule amends
the regulations to adopt interest
assumptions for plans with valuation
dates in March 2005. Interest
assumptions are also published on the
PBGC’s Web site (https://www.pbgc.gov).
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion, Attorney, Legislative
and Regulatory Department, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005,
202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users may
call the Federal relay service toll-free at
1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
PBGC’s regulations prescribe actuarial
assumptions—including interest
assumptions—for valuing and paying
plan benefits of terminating single-
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7651
employer plans covered by title IV of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974. The interest
assumptions are intended to reflect
current conditions in the financial and
annuity markets.
Three sets of interest assumptions are
prescribed: (1) A set for the valuation of
benefits for allocation purposes under
section 4044 (found in Appendix B to
part 4044), (2) a set for the PBGC to use
to determine whether a benefit is
payable as a lump sum and to determine
lump-sum amounts to be paid by the
PBGC (found in Appendix B to part
4022), and (3) a set for private-sector
pension practitioners to refer to if they
wish to use lump-sum interest rates
determined using the PBGC’s historical
methodology (found in Appendix C to
part 4022).
Accordingly, this amendment (1) adds
to Appendix B to part 4044 the interest
assumptions for valuing benefits for
allocation purposes in plans with
valuation dates during March 2005, (2)
adds to Appendix B to part 4022 the
interest assumptions for the PBGC to
use for its own lump-sum payments in
plans with valuation dates during
March 2005, and (3) adds to Appendix
C to part 4022 the interest assumptions
for private-sector pension practitioners
to refer to if they wish to use lump-sum
interest rates determined using the
PBGC’s historical methodology for
valuation dates during March 2005.
For valuation of benefits for allocation
purposes, the interest assumptions that
the PBGC will use (set forth in
Appendix B to part 4044) will be 3.80
percent for the first 20 years following
the valuation date and 4.75 percent
thereafter. These interest assumptions
represent a decrease (from those in
effect for February 2005) of 0.20 percent
for the first 20 years following the
valuation date and are otherwise
unchanged.
The interest assumptions that the
PBGC will use for its own lump-sum
payments (set forth in Appendix B to
part 4022) will be 2.75 percent for the
period during which a benefit is in pay
status and 4.00 percent during any years
preceding the benefit’s placement in pay
status. These interest assumptions
represent a decrease (from those in
effect for February 2005) of 0.25 percent
for the period during which a benefit is
in pay status and are otherwise
unchanged.
For private-sector payments, the
interest assumptions (set forth in
Appendix C to part 4022) will be the
same as those used by the PBGC for
determining and paying lump sums (set
forth in Appendix B to part 4022).
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 15, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7650-7651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2903]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 1944
Housing Application Packaging Grants
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agency is revising its internal Housing Application
Packaging Grants regulation in order to correct an erroneous reference
to the debarment and suspension regulation. This action is necessary
since the existing regulation does not accurately reflect the current
information. The intended effect is to remove the incorrect reference
to the regulation.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective February 15, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas P. Dickson, Program Analyst,
Program Support Staff, Rural Development, Room 6900 South Building,
Stop 0761, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-1570.
Telephone: (202) 690-4492, FAX: (202) 690-4335, e-mail:
thomas.dickson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This action is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12866 since it involves only internal Agency management. This action is
not published for prior notice and comment under the Administrative
Procedure Act since it involves only internal Agency management and
publication for comment is unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest.
Program Affected
The program affected is listed in catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under 10.442--Housing Application Packaging Grants.
Intergovernmental Consultation
Programs with Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance the number
10.442 are not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372.
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. In accordance with this rule: (1) Unless
otherwise specifically provided, all State and local laws and
regulations that are in conflict with this rule will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this rule except as specifically
prescribed in the rule; and (3) administrative Division (7 CFR part 11)
must be exhausted before litigation against the Department is
instituted.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 and were assigned OMB control number
0575-0157 in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. No
person is required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number. This rule does not impose any new
information collection requirements from those approved by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Administrator of the Rural Housing Service has determined that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). New provisions included in this rule will not
impact a substantial number of small entities to a greater extent than
large entities. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not
performed.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
Agencies generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the agencies to
identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives
and adopt the least costly, more cost-effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This rule
contains no
[[Page 7651]]
Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of title II of the
UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.
Thus, the rule is not subject to the requirements of section 202 and
205 of the UMRA.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' The Agencies have determined that
this final action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of human environment, and in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not required.
Background
In November 2003, the Federal Register published a Final Rule that
implemented changes to the governmentwide nonprocurment debarment and
suspension common rule (NCR) and the associated rule on drug-free
workplace requirements. The NCR set forth the common policies and
procedures that Federal Executive branch agencies must use in taking
suspension or debarment actions. It also established procedures for
participants and Federal agencies in entering covered transactions.
Following the procedures set forth in the NCR will help ensure that the
agency action complies with due process standards and provides the
public with uniform procedures.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1944
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Housing and
community development, Loan Programs, Migrant labor, Nonprofit
organizations, Reporting requirements, Rural Housing.
0
For the reasons set forth in the summary, chapter XVIII, title 7, Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 1944--HOUSING
0
1. The authority citation for part 3550 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart B--Housing Application Packaging Grants
0
2. Section 1944.74 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1944.74 Debarment or Suspension.
Certified packagers whose actions or acts warrant they not be
allowed to participate in the program are to be investigated in
accordance with agency procedures (available in any Rural Development
office).
Dated: January 18, 2005.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-2903 Filed 2-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P