Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California; Pilgrim Vegetation Management Project, 7468-7469 [05-2767]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7468
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 29
Monday, February 14, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest,
California; Pilgrim Vegetation
Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Shasta-Trinity National
Forest proposes to harvest timber and
clean up the resulting down wood
(fuels) on approximately 3,770 acres of
National Forest System lands. About
90% of the area would be harvested
through thinning by removing a portion
of the trees from overcrowded forest
stands. Trees removed would be those
infected with disease or insects and
generally smaller in size than those left
behind. Most of the trees on the
remaining 10% are infected by disease
and insects and would be removed.
Young tree seedlings would be planted
in the openings created in these areas.
The project area is in T40 and 41N,
R1W, MDM., about 10 miles northeast of
the town of McCloud, California. Most
of the project area is zoned by the Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan as
Matrix land. About one percent of the
area is zoned as Riparian Reserve (areas
adjacent to streams or other wetlands).
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis should be received no
later than 30 days after the publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected in June 2005 and
the final environmental impact
statement is expected in September
2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
District Ranger Michael Hupp, ShastaMcCloud Management Unit, 204 W.
Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California 96067.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Funk, McCloud Ranger Station,
P.O. Box 1620, McCloud, California
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:28 Feb 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
96057, telephone (530) 964–3770 or via
e-mail at sfunk@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Thinning will reduce overcrowded
conditions in forest areas where too
many trees currently exist. Reducing
density will improve the health of these
forest areas by making more water,
nutrients and sunlight available for use
by the remaining trees (conifers and
hardwoods). This will improve the
health of the forest and improve tree
resistance to insects, pathogens and
drought. Too many small trees in the
understory can act as a fuel ladder and
carry fire into the canopy layer of the
forest resulting in the death of a large
number of trees. Small trees act as a fuel
ladder because their crowns are closer
to the ground and allow flames to move
into the canopy. Removing small trees
raises the crown base height and
reduces the likelihood of flames
reaching the canopy layer.
The removal of groups of trees and replanting with tree seedlings is being
proposed to re-establish live trees in
areas where most are dead or dying from
insects, pathogens and drought. The
harvest and sale of wood products will
provide wood products to society and
offset the cost of treatment.
Proposed Action
The project will include the following
treatments:
1. Thinning harvests on
approximately 3,380 acres.
a. On 780 acres of 25–45 year old pine
stands, thin from below to a spacing of
approximately 20 feet. About 90% of
these stands are older plantations. The
resulting product will be primarily
wood chips.
b. On approximately 1,480 acres of
75–95 year old stands, thin to a density
appropriate for ponderosa pine stands
(approximately 120–150 square feet of
basal area).
c. On approximately 1,080 acres of
75–95 year old pine stands, thin to a
slightly more open condition than ‘‘b’’
(approximately 100–120 square feet of
basal area) by removing additional dead,
dying and diseased trees in pockets
infected with root diseases and maintain
pine savanna stands in historic
openings.
d. On approximately 40 acres, thin
two-storied mature stands to reduce
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
understory ladder fuels and maintain
older trees, especially pines.
On all of the thinning harvests, smalldiameter trees not needed for optimum
stocking will be removed as wood chips.
After the harvest treatments the project
area would be treated to reduce
accumulations of down wood and deep
needle slash by underburning 200 acres
and tractor piling and burning 1,000
acres.
e. Release aspen from conifer
competition on approximately 16 acres
by removing conifers within 150 feet of
aspen.
2. Harvest 10 acres of knobcone pine
for sale as wood chips. Tractor pile
residual slash and re-plant with
ponderosa pine.
3. Harvest and re-plant approximately
370 acres of 95–110 year old pine
suffering from root disease and bark
beetle mortality. Leave healthy white fir,
incense-cedar, sugar pine, Douglas-fir
and black oak. Remove wood products.
Tractor pile residual slash. Re-plant
with mixed species in shaded areas,
ponderosa pine in open areas. The
timber harvest outputs from the entire
project are anticipated to be
approximately 40–50 thousand CCF
(25–30 MMBF) of sawlog products plus
approximately 3,000 tons of chipped
wood products.
The proposed action includes borax
application on stumps to prevent the
spread of annosus root disease, but does
not include the use of herbicides or
pesticides. The project may include the
construction of short lengths of
temporary road and the closure or
decommissioning of other roads.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
Lead Agency: USDA, Forest Service.
Responsible Official
J. Sharon Heywood, Forest
Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding,
CA 96002.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that
meets the purpose and need, or take no
action.
Scoping Process
The project is included in the ShastaTrinity National Forest’s quarterly
schedule of proposed actions (SOPA).
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 29 / Monday, February 14, 2005 / Notices
Information on the proposed action will
also be posted on the forest Web site,
https://www.fs.fed.us/r5.shastatrinity/
projects, and advertised in the Mt.
Shasta Herald. A field trip will be held
for interested parties in May of 2005.
This notice of intent intimates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments submitted
during this scoping process should be in
writing and should be specific to the
proposed action. The comments should
describe as clearly and completely as
possible any issue the commenter has
with the proposal. The scoping process
includes:
(a) Identifying potential issues.
(b) Identifying issues to be analyzed
in depth.
(c) Eliminating non-significant issues
or those previously covered by a
relevant previous environmental
analysis.
(d) Exploring additional alternatives.
(e) Identifying potential
environmental effects of the proposed
action and alternatives.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes it is important to
give reviewers notice of several court
rulings related to public participation in
the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)).
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be dismissed by
the courts. (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the 45 day comment period thus
ensuring substantive comments and
objections are available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:28 Feb 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
7469
respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Bell Lunsford, Public Affairs
Officer, USDA, Homochitto National
Forest, 1200 Hwy. 184 East, Meadville,
MS 39653 (601–384–5876)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff, Committee
members and elected officials. However,
persons who wish to bring matters to
the attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff before or after the meeting. A
public input session will be provided
and individuals who made written
requests by March 11, 2005, will have
the opportunity to address the
committee at that session. Individuals
wishing to speak or propose agenda
items must send their names and
proposals to Tim Reed, District Ranger,
DFO, 1200 Hwy. 184 East, Meadville,
MS 39653.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: January 24, 2005.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–2767 Filed 2–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–52–M
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Forest Service
Southwest Mississippi Resource
Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Meeting notice for the
Southwest Mississippi Resource
Advisory Committee under Section 205
of the Secure Rural Schools and
Community Self Determination Act of
2000 (Pub. L. 106–393).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is published in
accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Meeting notice is hereby given for the
Southwest Mississippi Resource
Advisory Committee pursuant to
Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools
and Community Self Determination Act
of 2000, Public Law 106–393. Topics to
be discussed include: general
information, possible Title II projects,
and the next meeting dates and agendas.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
March 22, 2005, from 6 p.m. and end at
approximately 9 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Franklin County Public Library, 381
First Street, Meadville, Mississippi.
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PO 00000
Dated: February 4, 2005.
Tim Reed,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–2748 Filed 2–11–05; 8:45 am]
Sfmt 4703
[A–549–812]
Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand: Notice
of Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of 2003–2004
Antidumping Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Smith at (202) 482–1276, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
AGENCY:
Background
On August 30, 2004, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice of initiation of
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on furfuryl
alcohol from Thailand covering the
period July 1, 2003 through June 30,
2004. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 69 FR 52857
(August 30, 2004). The preliminary
results for this review are currently due
no later than April 4, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 29 (Monday, February 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7468-7469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2767]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 29 / Monday, February 14, 2005 /
Notices
[[Page 7468]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California; Pilgrim Vegetation
Management Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Shasta-Trinity National Forest proposes to harvest timber
and clean up the resulting down wood (fuels) on approximately 3,770
acres of National Forest System lands. About 90% of the area would be
harvested through thinning by removing a portion of the trees from
overcrowded forest stands. Trees removed would be those infected with
disease or insects and generally smaller in size than those left
behind. Most of the trees on the remaining 10% are infected by disease
and insects and would be removed. Young tree seedlings would be planted
in the openings created in these areas. The project area is in T40 and
41N, R1W, MDM., about 10 miles northeast of the town of McCloud,
California. Most of the project area is zoned by the Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan as Matrix land. About one percent of the area
is zoned as Riparian Reserve (areas adjacent to streams or other
wetlands).
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received
no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in June 2005 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
in September 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to District Ranger Michael Hupp,
Shasta-McCloud Management Unit, 204 W. Alma St., Mt. Shasta, California
96067.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Funk, McCloud Ranger Station,
P.O. Box 1620, McCloud, California 96057, telephone (530) 964-3770 or
via e-mail at sfunk@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Thinning will reduce overcrowded conditions in forest areas where
too many trees currently exist. Reducing density will improve the
health of these forest areas by making more water, nutrients and
sunlight available for use by the remaining trees (conifers and
hardwoods). This will improve the health of the forest and improve tree
resistance to insects, pathogens and drought. Too many small trees in
the understory can act as a fuel ladder and carry fire into the canopy
layer of the forest resulting in the death of a large number of trees.
Small trees act as a fuel ladder because their crowns are closer to the
ground and allow flames to move into the canopy. Removing small trees
raises the crown base height and reduces the likelihood of flames
reaching the canopy layer.
The removal of groups of trees and re-planting with tree seedlings
is being proposed to re-establish live trees in areas where most are
dead or dying from insects, pathogens and drought. The harvest and sale
of wood products will provide wood products to society and offset the
cost of treatment.
Proposed Action
The project will include the following treatments:
1. Thinning harvests on approximately 3,380 acres.
a. On 780 acres of 25-45 year old pine stands, thin from below to a
spacing of approximately 20 feet. About 90% of these stands are older
plantations. The resulting product will be primarily wood chips.
b. On approximately 1,480 acres of 75-95 year old stands, thin to a
density appropriate for ponderosa pine stands (approximately 120-150
square feet of basal area).
c. On approximately 1,080 acres of 75-95 year old pine stands, thin
to a slightly more open condition than ``b'' (approximately 100-120
square feet of basal area) by removing additional dead, dying and
diseased trees in pockets infected with root diseases and maintain pine
savanna stands in historic openings.
d. On approximately 40 acres, thin two-storied mature stands to
reduce understory ladder fuels and maintain older trees, especially
pines.
On all of the thinning harvests, small-diameter trees not needed
for optimum stocking will be removed as wood chips. After the harvest
treatments the project area would be treated to reduce accumulations of
down wood and deep needle slash by underburning 200 acres and tractor
piling and burning 1,000 acres.
e. Release aspen from conifer competition on approximately 16 acres
by removing conifers within 150 feet of aspen.
2. Harvest 10 acres of knobcone pine for sale as wood chips.
Tractor pile residual slash and re-plant with ponderosa pine.
3. Harvest and re-plant approximately 370 acres of 95-110 year old
pine suffering from root disease and bark beetle mortality. Leave
healthy white fir, incense-cedar, sugar pine, Douglas-fir and black
oak. Remove wood products. Tractor pile residual slash. Re-plant with
mixed species in shaded areas, ponderosa pine in open areas. The timber
harvest outputs from the entire project are anticipated to be
approximately 40-50 thousand CCF (25-30 MMBF) of sawlog products plus
approximately 3,000 tons of chipped wood products.
The proposed action includes borax application on stumps to prevent
the spread of annosus root disease, but does not include the use of
herbicides or pesticides. The project may include the construction of
short lengths of temporary road and the closure or decommissioning of
other roads.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
Lead Agency: USDA, Forest Service.
Responsible Official
J. Sharon Heywood, Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, CA 96002.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that meets the purpose and need, or
take no action.
Scoping Process
The project is included in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest's
quarterly schedule of proposed actions (SOPA).
[[Page 7469]]
Information on the proposed action will also be posted on the forest
Web site, https://www.fs.fed.us/r5.shastatrinity/projects, and
advertised in the Mt. Shasta Herald. A field trip will be held for
interested parties in May of 2005. This notice of intent intimates the
scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments submitted during this scoping process should
be in writing and should be specific to the proposed action. The
comments should describe as clearly and completely as possible any
issue the commenter has with the proposal. The scoping process
includes:
(a) Identifying potential issues.
(b) Identifying issues to be analyzed in depth.
(c) Eliminating non-significant issues or those previously covered
by a relevant previous environmental analysis.
(d) Exploring additional alternatives.
(e) Identifying potential environmental effects of the proposed
action and alternatives.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers
notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental
impact statements must structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. (Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be
dismissed by the courts. (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022
(9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45 day comment period thus ensuring substantive
comments and objections are available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: January 24, 2005.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-2767 Filed 2-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
