Walnuts Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate, 7002-7004 [05-2603]
Download as PDF
7002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 27 / Thursday, February 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
section, any lot of Rainier cherries or
other varieties of ‘‘lightly colored sweet
cherries’’ unless such cherries meet a
minimum of 17 percent soluble solids as
determined from a composite sample by
refractometer prior to packing, at time of
packing, or at time of shipment:
Provided, That individual lots shall not
be combined with other lots to meet
soluble solids requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 4, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–2545 Filed 2–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Docket No. FV04–984–2 FIR]
Walnuts Grown in California;
Decreased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, an interim final rule which
decreased the assessment rate
established for the Walnut Marketing
Board (Board) for the 2004–05 and
subsequent marketing years from
$0.0101 to $0.0094 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
locally administers the marketing order
(order) which regulates the handling of
walnuts grown in California.
Authorization to assess walnut handlers
enables the Board to incur expenses that
are reasonable and necessary to
administer the program. The marketing
year began August 1 and ends July 31.
The assessment rate will remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Sasselli, Program Analyst, or Kurt J.
Kimmel, Regional Manager, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno,
California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or George
Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Feb 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 984, both as amended (7
CFR part 984), regulating the handling
of walnuts grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The marketing agreement and order are
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California walnut handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable walnuts
beginning on August 1, 2004, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated. This rule will not preempt
any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Board for the
2004–05 and subsequent marketing
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
years from $0.0101 to $0.0094 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts.
The order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of the USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Board are producers and
handlers of California walnuts. They are
familiar with the Board’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2003–04 and subsequent
marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate of $0.0101 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on September 10,
2004, and unanimously recommended
2004–05 expenditures of $2,749,500 and
an assessment rate of $0.0094 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $2,863,350.
The assessment rate of $0.0094 is
$0.0007 lower than the $0.0101 rate
previously in effect. The lower
assessment rate is necessary because
this year’s crop is estimated by the
California Agricultural Statistics Service
(CASS) to be 325,000 tons (292,500,000
kernelweight pounds merchantable),
and the budget is about 4 percent less
than last year’s budget. Sufficient
income should be generated at the lower
rate for the Board to meet its anticipated
expenses.
Major categories in the budget
recommended by the Board for 2004–05
include $2,037,500 for research and
marketing programs ($1,393,500 for
market research and development,
$550,000 for production research, and
$94,000 to the California Agricultural
Statistics Service for a crop estimate),
$332,000 for employee expenses
(administrative and office salaries,
payroll taxes, workers compensation,
and other employee benefits), $97,000
for office expenses (rent, office supplies,
telephone, fax, postage, printing,
equipment maintenance, and furniture),
$96,000 for other operating expenses
(management travel, field travel,
insurance, and financial audits), $5,000
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 27 / Thursday, February 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
for controlled (compliance check)
purchases, $75,000 for a production
research director, and $107,000 as a
reserve for contingency. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2003–04
were $2,438,000, $334,625, $83,000,
$82,000, $5,000, $73,000, and $15,725,
respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. Merchantable
shipments for the year are estimated at
292,500,000 kernelweight pounds
which should provide $2,749,500 in
assessment income and allow the Board
to cover its expenses. Unexpended
funds may be used temporarily to defray
expenses of the subsequent marketing
year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5
months after the end of the year
according to § 984.69.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and other
information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate is
effective for an indefinite period, the
Board will continue to meet prior to or
during each marketing year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Board meetings are
available from the Board or USDA.
Board meetings are open to the public
and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA
will evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The Board’s 2004–05 budget
and those for subsequent marketing
years will be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Feb 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 5,800
producers of walnuts in the production
area and about 43 handlers subject to
regulation under the order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$5,000,000.
Current industry information shows
that 14 of the 43 handlers (32.5 percent)
shipped over $5,000,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the Small
Business Administration. Twenty-nine
of the 43 walnut handlers (67.5 percent)
shipped under $5,000,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be
considered small handlers. An
estimated 58 walnut producers, or about
1 percent of the 5,800 total producers,
would be considered large producers
with annual incomes over $750,000.
Based on the foregoing, it can be
concluded that the majority of
California walnut handlers and
producers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Board and
collected from handlers for the 2004–05
and subsequent marketing years from
$0.0101 to $0.0094 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
unanimously recommended 2004–05
expenditures of $2,749,500. The
decreased assessment rate should
generate sufficient income to meet the
Board’s 2004–05 anticipated expenses.
The lower assessment rate is primarily
due to a lower budget and based on an
estimated crop of 325,000 tons for the
year (292,500,000 kernelweight pounds
estimated merchantable).
Major categories in the budget
recommended by the Board for 2004–05
include $2,037,500 for research and
marketing programs ($1,393,500 for
market research and development,
$550,000 for production research, and
$94,000 to the California Agricultural
Statistics Service for a crop estimate),
$332,000 for employee expenses
(administrative and office salaries,
payroll taxes, workers compensation,
and other employees benefits), $97,000
for office expenses (rent, office supplies,
telephone, fax, postage, printing,
equipment maintenance, and furniture),
$96,000 for other operating expenses
(management travel, field travel, Board
expenses, insurance, and financial
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7003
audits), $5,000 for controlled
(compliance check) purchases, $75,000
for a production research director, and
$107,000 as a reserve for contingency.
Budgeted expenses for these items in
2003–04 were $2,438,000, $334,625,
$83,000, $82,000, $5,000, $73,000, and
$15,725, respectively.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Board considered information from
various sources, such as the Board’s
Budget and Personnel Committee,
Research Committee, and Marketing
Development Committee. Alternative
expenditure levels were discussed by
these groups based upon the relative
value of various research projects to the
walnut industry. The recommended
$0.0094 per kernelweight pound
assessment rate was then determined by
dividing the total recommended budget
by the 292,500,000 kernelweight pound
estimate of assessable walnuts for the
year. Unexpended funds may be used
temporarily to defray expenses of the
subsequent marketing year, but must be
made available to the handlers from
whom collected within 5 months after
the end of the year according to
§ 984.69.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the current marketing year indicates that
the grower price for 2004–05 could
range between $0.50 and $0.70 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2004–05
marketing year as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 1.3
and 1.9 percent.
This action continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Board’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the walnut
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the
September 10, 2004, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California
walnut handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
7004
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 27 / Thursday, February 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on October 29, 2004 (69 FR
63043). Copies of that rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all
walnut handlers. Finally, the interim
final rule was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of
the Federal Register. A 60-day comment
period was provided for interested
persons to respond to the interim final
rule. The comment period ended on
December 28, 2004, and one comment
was received.
The commenter believes that the
Board and this marketing order program
should be terminated in favor of a free
market system. However, the Act
authorizes this marketing order
program. Further, this comment does
not relate to the Board’s assessment rate
decrease. Thus, no changes are being
made based on the comment submitted.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1260
[Docket No. LS–04–09]
Beef Promotion and Research;
Reapportionment
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule adjusts
representation on the Cattlemen’s Beef
Promotion and Research Board (Board),
established under the Beef Promotion
and Research Act of 1985 (Act), to
reflect changes in cattle inventories and
cattle and beef imports that have
occurred since the most recent Board
reapportionment rule became effective
in 2002. These adjustments are required
by the Beef Promotion and Research
Order (Order) and will result in a
decrease in Board membership from 108
to 104, effective with the Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) appointments for
terms beginning early in the year 2006.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 10, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth R. Payne, Chief, Marketing
Programs Branch, Room 2638–S,
Livestock and Seed Program,
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS),
USDA, STOP 0251, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0251; telephone number 202/720–1115;
facsimile 202/720–1125, or by e-mail at:
Kenenth.Payne@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
CALIFORNIA
have retroactive effect.
Section 11 of the Act provides that
I Accordingly, the interim final rule
nothing in the Act may be construed to
amending 7 CFR part 984 which was
preempt or supersede any other program
published at 69 FR 63043 on October 29, relating to beef promotion organized
and operated under the laws of the
2004, is adopted as a final rule without
United States or any State. There are no
change.
administrative proceedings that must be
Dated: February 7, 2005.
exhausted prior to any judicial
Kenneth C. Clayton,
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–2603 Filed 2–9–05; 8:45 am]
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and the
Paperwork Reduction Act
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Feb 09, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(5 United States Code (U.S.C.) 601 et
seq.).
The Administrator of AMS has
considered the economic effect of this
action on small entities and has
determined that this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The purpose of RFA is to fit regulatory
actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions in order that small
businesses will not be unduly burdened.
In the January 30, 2004, issue of
‘‘Cattle,’’ USDA’s National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) estimates that
in 2004 the number of cattle operations
in the United States totaled about 1.1
million. The majority of these
operations subject to the Order, 7 CFR
1260.101 et seq., are considered small
businesses under the criteria established
by the Small Business Administration.
This final rule imposes no new
burden on the industry. It only adjusts
representation on the Board, established
under the Act, to reflect changes in
domestic cattle inventory and cattle and
beef imports. The adjustments are
required by the Order and will result in
a decrease in Board membership from
108 to 104.
Background
The Board was initially appointed
August 4, 1986, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.) and the Order issued thereunder.
Domestic representation on the Board is
based on cattle inventory numbers, and
importer representation is based on the
conversion of the volume of imported
cattle, beef, or beef products into live
animal equivalencies.
Section 1260.141(b) of the Order
provides that the Board shall be
composed of cattle producers and
importers appointed by the Secretary of
Agriculture from nominations submitted
by certified producer and importer
organizations. A producer may only be
nominated to represent the unit in
which that producer is a resident.
Section 1260.141(c) of the Order
provides that at least every 3 years and
not more than every 2 years, the Board
shall review the geographic distribution
of cattle inventories throughout the
United States and the volume of
imported cattle, beef, and beef products
and, if warranted, shall reapportion
units and/or modify the number of
Board members from units in order to
reflect the geographic distribution of
cattle production volume in the United
States and the volume of cattle, beef, or
beef products imported into the United
States.
Section 1260.141(d) of the Order
authorizes the Board to recommend to
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 27 (Thursday, February 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7002-7004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2603]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Docket No. FV04-984-2 FIR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, an interim final rule which decreased the assessment rate
established for the Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the 2004-05 and
subsequent marketing years from $0.0101 to $0.0094 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board locally administers the
marketing order (order) which regulates the handling of walnuts grown
in California. Authorization to assess walnut handlers enables the
Board to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to administer
the program. The marketing year began August 1 and ends July 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Sasselli, Program Analyst, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721;
Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart,
Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-
8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
walnuts beginning on August 1, 2004, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Board for the 2004-05 and
subsequent marketing years from $0.0101 to $0.0094 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts.
The order provides authority for the Board, with the approval of
the USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Board are producers and handlers of California walnuts. They are
familiar with the Board's needs and with the costs for goods and
services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly
affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2003-04 and subsequent marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0101 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on September 10, 2004, and unanimously recommended
2004-05 expenditures of $2,749,500 and an assessment rate of $0.0094
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last
year's budgeted expenditures were $2,863,350. The assessment rate of
$0.0094 is $0.0007 lower than the $0.0101 rate previously in effect.
The lower assessment rate is necessary because this year's crop is
estimated by the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) to
be 325,000 tons (292,500,000 kernelweight pounds merchantable), and the
budget is about 4 percent less than last year's budget. Sufficient
income should be generated at the lower rate for the Board to meet its
anticipated expenses.
Major categories in the budget recommended by the Board for 2004-05
include $2,037,500 for research and marketing programs ($1,393,500 for
market research and development, $550,000 for production research, and
$94,000 to the California Agricultural Statistics Service for a crop
estimate), $332,000 for employee expenses (administrative and office
salaries, payroll taxes, workers compensation, and other employee
benefits), $97,000 for office expenses (rent, office supplies,
telephone, fax, postage, printing, equipment maintenance, and
furniture), $96,000 for other operating expenses (management travel,
field travel, insurance, and financial audits), $5,000
[[Page 7003]]
for controlled (compliance check) purchases, $75,000 for a production
research director, and $107,000 as a reserve for contingency. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2003-04 were $2,438,000, $334,625, $83,000,
$82,000, $5,000, $73,000, and $15,725, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. Merchantable shipments for the year
are estimated at 292,500,000 kernelweight pounds which should provide
$2,749,500 in assessment income and allow the Board to cover its
expenses. Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses
of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of the year
according to Sec. 984.69.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and other information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite
period, the Board will continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Board meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to determine whether modification of
the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The Board's 2004-05 budget and those for subsequent
marketing years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 5,800 producers of walnuts in the
production area and about 43 handlers subject to regulation under the
order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000.
Current industry information shows that 14 of the 43 handlers (32.5
percent) shipped over $5,000,000 of merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the Small Business Administration. Twenty-
nine of the 43 walnut handlers (67.5 percent) shipped under $5,000,000
of merchantable walnuts and could be considered small handlers. An
estimated 58 walnut producers, or about 1 percent of the 5,800 total
producers, would be considered large producers with annual incomes over
$750,000. Based on the foregoing, it can be concluded that the majority
of California walnut handlers and producers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Board and collected from handlers
for the 2004-05 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0101 to $0.0094
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. The Board unanimously
recommended 2004-05 expenditures of $2,749,500. The decreased
assessment rate should generate sufficient income to meet the Board's
2004-05 anticipated expenses. The lower assessment rate is primarily
due to a lower budget and based on an estimated crop of 325,000 tons
for the year (292,500,000 kernelweight pounds estimated merchantable).
Major categories in the budget recommended by the Board for 2004-05
include $2,037,500 for research and marketing programs ($1,393,500 for
market research and development, $550,000 for production research, and
$94,000 to the California Agricultural Statistics Service for a crop
estimate), $332,000 for employee expenses (administrative and office
salaries, payroll taxes, workers compensation, and other employees
benefits), $97,000 for office expenses (rent, office supplies,
telephone, fax, postage, printing, equipment maintenance, and
furniture), $96,000 for other operating expenses (management travel,
field travel, Board expenses, insurance, and financial audits), $5,000
for controlled (compliance check) purchases, $75,000 for a production
research director, and $107,000 as a reserve for contingency. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2003-04 were $2,438,000, $334,625, $83,000,
$82,000, $5,000, $73,000, and $15,725, respectively.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the Board considered information
from various sources, such as the Board's Budget and Personnel
Committee, Research Committee, and Marketing Development Committee.
Alternative expenditure levels were discussed by these groups based
upon the relative value of various research projects to the walnut
industry. The recommended $0.0094 per kernelweight pound assessment
rate was then determined by dividing the total recommended budget by
the 292,500,000 kernelweight pound estimate of assessable walnuts for
the year. Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses
of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of the year
according to Sec. 984.69.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the current marketing year indicates that the grower
price for 2004-05 could range between $0.50 and $0.70 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2004-05 marketing year as a percentage of total grower
revenue could range between 1.3 and 1.9 percent.
This action continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. In addition, the
Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the walnut industry
and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board
meetings, the September 10, 2004, meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this
issue.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California walnut handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
[[Page 7004]]
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63043). Copies of that rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all walnut handlers. Finally,
the interim final rule was made available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period was
provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final rule.
The comment period ended on December 28, 2004, and one comment was
received.
The commenter believes that the Board and this marketing order
program should be terminated in favor of a free market system. However,
the Act authorizes this marketing order program. Further, this comment
does not relate to the Board's assessment rate decrease. Thus, no
changes are being made based on the comment submitted.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 984 which was
published at 69 FR 63043 on October 29, 2004, is adopted as a final
rule without change.
Dated: February 7, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-2603 Filed 2-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P