Iowa Regulatory Program, 6606-6608 [05-2410]
Download as PDF
6606
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. IA–014–FOR]
Iowa Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Iowa
regulatory program (Iowa program)
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Iowa proposes revisions to its
April 1999 revegetation success
guidelines titled, ‘‘Revegetation Success
Standards and Statistically Valid
Sampling Techniques.’’ Iowa intends to
revise its program in response to
required program amendments.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Iowa program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., c.s.t., March 10, 2005. If requested,
we will hold a public hearing on the
amendment on March 7, 2005. We will
accept requests to speak at a hearing
until 4 p.m., c.s.t. on February 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. IA–014–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: MCR_AMEND@osmre.gov.
Include Docket No. IA–014–FOR in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Andrew R.
Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 501 Belle Street,
Alton, Illinois 62002.
• Fax: (618) 463–6470.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:57 Feb 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Iowa program, this
amendment, and all written comments
received in response to this document,
you must go to the address listed below
during normal business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. You
may receive one free copy of the
amendment by contacting OSM’s Alton
Field Division.
Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 501 Belle
Street, Alton, Illinois 62002, telephone:
(618) 463–6460, e-mail:
MCR_AMEND@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location: Iowa
Department of Agriculture and Land
Stewardship, Division of Soil
Conservation, Henry A. Wallace
Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50319,
telephone: (515) 281–6147.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field
Division. Telephone: (618) 463–6460. Email: MCR_AMEND@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Iowa Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Iowa Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Iowa
program effective April 10, 1981. You
can find background information on the
Iowa program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and the conditions of approval, in the
January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46
FR 5885). You can also find later actions
concerning the Iowa program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 915.10,
915.15, and 915.16.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated December 27, 2004
(Administrative Record No. IA–449),
Iowa sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). Iowa sent the amendment in
response to required program
amendments codified at 30 CFR
915.16(a) and (c). Below is a summary
of the changes proposed by Iowa. The
full text of the program amendment is
available for you to read at the locations
listed above under ADDRESSES.
The required program amendment
codified at 30 CFR 915.16(a) calls for
Iowa to submit for our approval
evidence that the U.S. Natural
Resources Conservation Service concurs
with its provisions to allow the use of
reference areas for determining success
of productivity on prime farmland as
proposed at Section III., Part F and
Section IV., Part A.2 of its revegetation
success guidelines. At 30 CFR 915.16(c),
Iowa is required to either remove
Section IV., Part G from its revegetation
success guidelines or submit for our
approval evidence that the U.S. Natural
Resources Conservation Service concurs
with the provisions in Part G. Part G,
pertaining to control areas, contains the
requirements and methods for making
climate-based adjustments to the prime
farmland average yields shown in the
County Soil Map Unit Yield Data tables.
In response to the above two required
program amendments, Iowa proposes to
amend Section III., Part F and Section
IV., Parts A and G of its April 1999
revegetation success guidelines titled,
‘‘Revegetation Success Standards and
Statistically Valid Sampling
Techniques,’’ by removing all text
related to prime farmland reference
areas and all text related to control area
adjustments of prime farmland and
revegetation success standards.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the State program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We will not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Alton Field Division may not be logged
in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit e-mail comments as an
ASCII or Word file avoiding the use of
special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include ‘‘Attn:
Docket No. IA–014–FOR’’ and your
name and return address in your e-mail
message. If you do not receive a
confirmation that we have received your
e-mail message, contact the Alton Field
Division at (618) 463–6460.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
normal business hours. We will not
consider anonymous comments. If
individual respondents request
confidentiality, we will honor their
request to the extent allowable by law.
Individual respondents who wish to
withhold their name or address from
public review, except for the city or
town, must state this prominently at the
beginning of their comments. We will
make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., c.s.t. on February 23, 2005. If you
are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:57 Feb 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6607
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact
that the Iowa program does not regulate
coal exploration and surface coal
mining and reclamation operations on
Indian lands. Therefore, the Iowa
program has no effect on federallyrecognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
6608
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 915
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:57 Feb 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: January 14, 2005.
Charles E. Sandberg,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional
Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 05–2410 Filed 2–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 050125017–5017–01; I.D.
011905E]
RIN 0648–AR57
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed 2005 specifications for
the Atlantic bluefish fishery; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2005
specifications for the Atlantic bluefish
fishery, including state-by-state
commercial quotas, a recreational
harvest limit, and recreational
possession limits for Atlantic bluefish
off the East Coast of the United States.
The intent of the specifications is to
conserve and manage the bluefish
resource and provide for sustainable
fisheries.
Public comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, on February 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, including the
Environmental Assessment (EA), Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
and the Essential Fish Habitat
Assessment (EFHA) are available from:
Daniel Furlong, Executive Director,
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council, Room 2115, Federal Building,
300 South New Street, Dover, DE
19904–6790. The EA, IRFA, and EFHA
are accessible via the Internet at http:/
www.nero.noaa.gov.
Comments on the proposed
specifications should be sent to: Patricia
A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
Northeast Regional Office, NMFS, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930–2298. Please mark the envelope,
‘‘Comments 2005 Bluefish
Specifications.’’ Comments also may be
sent via facsimile (fax) to 978–281–
9135. Comments on the specifications
may be submitted by e-mail. The
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mailbox address for providing e-mail
comments is
2005lBluefishlSpecs@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following document
identifier: ‘‘Comments–2005 Bluefish
Specifications.’’ Comments may also be
submitted electronically through the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don
Frei, Fishery Management Specialist,
(978) 281–9221, e-mail at
Don.Frei@noaa.gov, fax at (978) 281–
9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations implementing the Atlantic
Bluefish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) prepared by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council)
appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A
and J. Regulations requiring annual
specifications are found at 648.160. The
FMP requires that the Council
recommend, on an annual basis, a level
of total allowable catch (TAC) consistent
with the rebuilding program in the FMP.
An estimate of annual discards is
deducted from the TAC to calculate the
total allowable landings (TAL) that can
be made during the year by the
commercial and recreational fishing
sectors combined. The TAL is
comprised of a commercial quota and a
recreational harvest limit. The FMP
rebuilding program requires the TAC for
any given year to be set based either on
the fishing mortality rate (F) resulting
from the stock rebuilding schedule
specified in the FMP, or the estimated
F in the most recent fishing year,
whichever is lower.
The FMP further requires 17 percent
of the TAL to be allocated to the
commercial fishery as a quota, with the
remaining 83 percent allocated as a
recreational harvest limit, with the
stipulation that, if 17 percent of the TAL
is less than 10.5 million lb (4.8 million
kg) and the recreational fishery is not
projected to land its harvest limit for the
upcoming year, the commercial fishery
may be allocated up to 10.5 million lb
(4.8 million kg) as its quota. The
combination of the projected
recreational landings and the
commercial quota may not exceed the
TAL.
In addition, the FMP allows the
Council and NMFS to allocate up to 3
percent of the TAL as a Research SetAside (RSA), to support fishery
research. This RSA is deducted
proportionally from the amounts
allocated to the commercial quota and
recreational harvest limit.
The Council’s recommendations must
include supporting documentation, as
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6606-6608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2410]
[[Page 6606]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. IA-014-FOR]
Iowa Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Iowa
regulatory program (Iowa program) under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Iowa proposes revisions to
its April 1999 revegetation success guidelines titled, ``Revegetation
Success Standards and Statistically Valid Sampling Techniques.'' Iowa
intends to revise its program in response to required program
amendments.
This document gives the times and locations that the Iowa program
and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
c.s.t., March 10, 2005. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on
the amendment on March 7, 2005. We will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., c.s.t. on February 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. IA-014-
FOR, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: MCR--AMEND@osmre.gov. Include Docket No. IA-014-
FOR in the subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 501
Belle Street, Alton, Illinois 62002.
Fax: (618) 463-6470.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Iowa
program, this amendment, and all written comments received in response
to this document, you must go to the address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Alton Field
Division.
Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 501 Belle Street, Alton, Illinois
62002, telephone: (618) 463-6460, e-mail: MCR--AMEND@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following location: Iowa Department of
Agriculture and Land Stewardship, Division of Soil Conservation, Henry
A. Wallace Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50319, telephone: (515) 281-6147.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field
Division. Telephone: (618) 463-6460. E-mail: MCR--AMEND@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Iowa Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Iowa Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Iowa program effective April 10, 1981. You can find background
information on the Iowa program, including the Secretary's findings,
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval, in the
January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5885). You can also find
later actions concerning the Iowa program and program amendments at 30
CFR 915.10, 915.15, and 915.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated December 27, 2004 (Administrative Record No. IA-
449), Iowa sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Iowa sent the amendment in response to required program
amendments codified at 30 CFR 915.16(a) and (c). Below is a summary of
the changes proposed by Iowa. The full text of the program amendment is
available for you to read at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
The required program amendment codified at 30 CFR 915.16(a) calls
for Iowa to submit for our approval evidence that the U.S. Natural
Resources Conservation Service concurs with its provisions to allow the
use of reference areas for determining success of productivity on prime
farmland as proposed at Section III., Part F and Section IV., Part A.2
of its revegetation success guidelines. At 30 CFR 915.16(c), Iowa is
required to either remove Section IV., Part G from its revegetation
success guidelines or submit for our approval evidence that the U.S.
Natural Resources Conservation Service concurs with the provisions in
Part G. Part G, pertaining to control areas, contains the requirements
and methods for making climate-based adjustments to the prime farmland
average yields shown in the County Soil Map Unit Yield Data tables.
In response to the above two required program amendments, Iowa
proposes to amend Section III., Part F and Section IV., Parts A and G
of its April 1999 revegetation success guidelines titled,
``Revegetation Success Standards and Statistically Valid Sampling
Techniques,'' by removing all text related to prime farmland reference
areas and all text related to control area adjustments of prime
farmland and revegetation success standards.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the State program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We will not consider or respond to
your comments when developing the final rule if they are
[[Page 6607]]
received after the close of the comment period (see DATES). We will
make every attempt to log all comments into the administrative record,
but comments delivered to an address other than the Alton Field
Division may not be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit e-mail comments as an ASCII or Word file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also
include ``Attn: Docket No. IA-014-FOR'' and your name and return
address in your e-mail message. If you do not receive a confirmation
that we have received your e-mail message, contact the Alton Field
Division at (618) 463-6460.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during normal business hours.
We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents
request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent
allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their
name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must
state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., c.s.t. on
February 23, 2005. If you are disabled and need special accommodations
to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact that the Iowa program does not
regulate coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation
operations on Indian lands. Therefore, the Iowa program has no effect
on federally-recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
[[Page 6608]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 915
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: January 14, 2005.
Charles E. Sandberg,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 05-2410 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-C