Noise Exposure Map Notice for Scottsdale Airport, Scottsdale, CA, 6497-6498 [05-2231]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Phlx. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2004–96 and should
be submitted on or before February 28,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–476 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 09/79–0432]
Telesoft Partners II SBIC, L.P.; Notice
Seeking Exemption Under Section 312
of the Small Business Investment Act,
Conflicts of Interest
Notice is hereby given that Telesoft
Partners II SBIC, L.P., 1450 Fashion
Island Blvd., Suite 610, San Mateo, CA
94404, a Federal Licensee under the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958,
as amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection
with the financing of a small concern,
has sought an exemption under section
312 of the Act and section 107.730,
Financings which Constitute Conflicts
of Interest of the Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and
Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Telesoft
Partners II SBIC, L.P. proposes to
provide equity/debt security financing
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:04 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
to Aarohi Communications, Inc. The
financing is contemplated for working
capital and general corporate purposes.
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the
Regulations because Telesoft Partners II
QP, L.P., Telesoft Partners II, L.P. and
Telesoft NP Employee Fund, LLC, all
Associates of Telesoft Partners II SBIC,
L.P., own more than ten percent of
Aarohi Communications, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction to the
Associate Administrator for Investment,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Jaime Guzman-Fournier,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Investment.
[FR Doc. 05–2273 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Noise Exposure Map Notice for
Scottsdale Airport, Scottsdale, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the noise exposure
maps submitted by City of Scottsdale for
Scottsdale Airport under the provisions
of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq (Aviation
Safety and Noise Abatement Act) and 14
CFR part 150 are in compliance with
applicable requlirements.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the
FAA’s determination of the noise
exposure maps is January 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Simmons, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Pacific Region
Headquarters, P.O. Box 92007, Los
Angeles, California 9009, Telephone
310/725–3614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA finds
that the noise exposure maps submitted
for Scottsdale Airport are in compliance
with applicable requirements of part
150, effective January 21, 2005. Under
49 U.S.C. section 47503 of the Aviation
Safety and Notice Abatement Act
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’), an
airport operator may submit to the FAA
noise exposure maps which meet
applicable regualtions and which depict
non-compatible land uses as of the date
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6497
of submission of such maps, a
description of projected aircraft
operations, and the ways in which such
operations will affect such maps. The
Act requires such maps to be developed
in consultation with interested and
affected parties in the local community,
government agencies, and persons using
the airport. An airport operator who has
submitted noise exposre maps that are
found by FAA to be in compliance with
the requirements of Federal Aviation
Regulations (FAR) part 150,
promulgated pursuant to the Act may
submit a noise compatibility program
for FAA approval which sets forth the
measures the operator has taken or
proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the
introduction of additional noncompatible uses.
The FAA has completed its review of
the noise exposure maps and
accompanying documentation
submitted by City of Scottsdale,
Arizona. The documentation that
constitutes the ‘‘Noise Exposure Maps’’
as defined in section 150.7 of part 150
includes: Exhibit 1 ‘‘Existing Conditions
(2004) Noise Exposure Map,’’ and
Exhibit 2 ‘‘Five-Year Forecast (2009)
Noise Exposure Map.’’ The Noise
Exposure Maps contain current and
forecast information including the
depiction of the airport and its
boundaries, the runway configurations,
land uses such as residential, open
space, commercial/office, community
facilities, libraries, churches, open
space, infrastructure, vacant and
warehouse and those areas within the
Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level
(DNL) 65, 70a nd 75 noise contours.
Estimates for the number of people
within these contours for the year 2004
are shown in Table 4A. Estimates of the
future residential population within the
2009 noise controus are shown in Table
4A. Estimates of the future residential
population within the 2009 noise
controus are shown in Table 4D. Exhibit
3L displays the location of noise
monitoring sites. Flight tracks for the
existing and the five-year forecast Noise
Exposure Maps are found in Exhibits
3D, 3E, 3F and 3G. The type and
frequency of aircraft operations
(including nighttime operations) are
found in Tables 3A and 3B. The FAA
has determined that these noise
exposure maps and accompanying
documentation are in compliance with
applicable requirements. This
determination is effective on January 21,
2005.
FAA’s determination on an airport
operator’s noise exposure maps is
limited to a finding that the maps were
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
6498
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Notices
developed in accordance with the
procedures contained in Appendix A of
FAR part 150. Such determination does
not constitute approval of the
applicant’s data, information or plans,
or a commitment to approve a noise
compatibility program or to fund the
implementation of that program. If
questions arise concerning the precise
relationship of specific properties to
noise exposure contours depicted on a
noise exposure map submitted under
section 47503 of the Act, it should be
noted that the FAA is not involved in
any way in determining the relative
locations of specific properties with
regard to the depicted noise contours, or
in interpreting the noise exposure maps
to resolve questions concerning, for
example, which properties should be
covered by the provisions of section
47506 of the Act. These functions are
inseparable from the ultimate land use
control and planning responsibilities of
local government. These local
responsibilities are not changed in any
way under part 150 or through FAA’s
review of noise exposure maps.
Therefore, the responsibility for the
detailing overlaying of noise exposure
contours onto the map depicting
properties on the surface rests
exclusively with the airport operator
that submitted those maps, or with
those public agencies and planning
agencies with which consultation is
required under section 47503 of the Act.
The FAA has relied on the certification
by the airport operator, under section
150.21 of FAR part 150, that the
statutorily required consultation has
been accomplished.
Copies of the full noise exposure map
documentation and of the FAA’s
evaluation of the maps are available for
examination at the following locations:
Federal Aviation Administration,
Community and Environmental Needs
Division, APP–600, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
Federal Aviation Administration,
Western-Pacific Region, Airports
Division, Room 3012, 15000 Aviation
Boulevard, Hawthorne, California
90261.
Scott Gray, Aviation Director, City of
Scottsdale, Aviation Department, 15000
N. Airport Drive Suite 200, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85260.
Questions may be directed to the
individual named above under the
heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:38 Feb 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Issued in Hawthorne, California, on
January 21, 2005.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, AWP–600,
Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05–2231 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Application
05–07–00–ABE To Impose and Use the
Revenue From a Passenger Facility
Charge (PFC) at Lehigh Valley
International Airport, Allentown, PA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on
application.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and
invites public comment on the
application to impose and use the
revenue from a PFC at Lehigh Valley
International Airport under the
provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 40117 and
part 158 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 158).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
in triplicate to the FAA at the following
address: Ms. Lori Ledebohm,
Community Planner/PFC Contact,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, 3905
Hartzdale Drive, Suite 508, Camp Hill,
PA 17011.
In addition, one copy of any
comments submitted to the FAA must
be mailed or delivered to Mr. Lawrence
J. Krauter of the Lehigh-Northampton
Airport Authority at the following
address: 3311 Airport Road, Allentown,
PA 18109–3040.
Air carriers and foreign air carriers
may submit copies of written comments
previously provided to the LehighNorthampton Airport Authority under
section 158.23 of Part 158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Ledebohm, Community Planner/PFC
contact, Harrisburg Airports District
Office, 3905 Hartzdale Drive, Suite 508,
Camp Hill, PA 17011, 717–730–2835.
The application may be reviewed in
person at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to rule and invites public
comment on the application to impose
and use the revenue from a PFC at
Lehigh Valley International Airport
under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C.
40117 and part 158 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On January 28, 2005, the FAA
determined that the application to
impose and use the revenue from a PFC
submitted by Lehigh-Northampton
Airport Authority was substantially
complete within the requirements of
section 158.25 of part 158. The FAA
will approve or disapprove the
application, in whole or in part, no later
than May 6, 2005.
The following is a brief overview of
the application.
Proposed charge effective date: June
1, 2005.
Proposed charge expiration date:
August 1, 2005.
Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50.
Total estimated PFC revenue:
$27,940,236.
Brief description of proposed
project(s): Main Terminal Renovations &
Additions Class or classes of air carriers
which the public agency has requested
not be required to collect PFCs: Air
Taxi/Commercial Operators (ATCO).
Any person may inspect the
application in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA
regional Airports office located at:
Eastern Region, Airports Division, AEA–
610, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, New
York 11434.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the application, notice
and other documents germane to the
application in person at the LehighNorthampton Airport Authority.
Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, on
January 28, 2005.
Wayne T. Heibeck,
Manager, Harado Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 05–2219 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
New York & Lake Erie Railroad (NYLE)
(Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–
2004–19950)
The New York & Lake Erie Railroad
(NYLE) seeks a waiver of compliance
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6497-6498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2231]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Noise Exposure Map Notice for Scottsdale Airport, Scottsdale, CA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the noise exposure maps submitted by City of
Scottsdale for Scottsdale Airport under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.
47501 et seq (Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act) and 14 CFR part
150 are in compliance with applicable requlirements.
Effective Date: The effective date of the FAA's determination of the
noise exposure maps is January 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Simmons, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Pacific Region Headquarters, P.O. Box 92007,
Los Angeles, California 9009, Telephone 310/725-3614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA finds
that the noise exposure maps submitted for Scottsdale Airport are in
compliance with applicable requirements of part 150, effective January
21, 2005. Under 49 U.S.C. section 47503 of the Aviation Safety and
Notice Abatement Act (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act''), an
airport operator may submit to the FAA noise exposure maps which meet
applicable regualtions and which depict non-compatible land uses as of
the date of submission of such maps, a description of projected
aircraft operations, and the ways in which such operations will affect
such maps. The Act requires such maps to be developed in consultation
with interested and affected parties in the local community, government
agencies, and persons using the airport. An airport operator who has
submitted noise exposre maps that are found by FAA to be in compliance
with the requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) part 150,
promulgated pursuant to the Act may submit a noise compatibility
program for FAA approval which sets forth the measures the operator has
taken or proposes to take to reduce existing non-compatible uses and
prevent the introduction of additional non-compatible uses.
The FAA has completed its review of the noise exposure maps and
accompanying documentation submitted by City of Scottsdale, Arizona.
The documentation that constitutes the ``Noise Exposure Maps'' as
defined in section 150.7 of part 150 includes: Exhibit 1 ``Existing
Conditions (2004) Noise Exposure Map,'' and Exhibit 2 ``Five-Year
Forecast (2009) Noise Exposure Map.'' The Noise Exposure Maps contain
current and forecast information including the depiction of the airport
and its boundaries, the runway configurations, land uses such as
residential, open space, commercial/office, community facilities,
libraries, churches, open space, infrastructure, vacant and warehouse
and those areas within the Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)
65, 70a nd 75 noise contours. Estimates for the number of people within
these contours for the year 2004 are shown in Table 4A. Estimates of
the future residential population within the 2009 noise controus are
shown in Table 4A. Estimates of the future residential population
within the 2009 noise controus are shown in Table 4D. Exhibit 3L
displays the location of noise monitoring sites. Flight tracks for the
existing and the five-year forecast Noise Exposure Maps are found in
Exhibits 3D, 3E, 3F and 3G. The type and frequency of aircraft
operations (including nighttime operations) are found in Tables 3A and
3B. The FAA has determined that these noise exposure maps and
accompanying documentation are in compliance with applicable
requirements. This determination is effective on January 21, 2005.
FAA's determination on an airport operator's noise exposure maps is
limited to a finding that the maps were
[[Page 6498]]
developed in accordance with the procedures contained in Appendix A of
FAR part 150. Such determination does not constitute approval of the
applicant's data, information or plans, or a commitment to approve a
noise compatibility program or to fund the implementation of that
program. If questions arise concerning the precise relationship of
specific properties to noise exposure contours depicted on a noise
exposure map submitted under section 47503 of the Act, it should be
noted that the FAA is not involved in any way in determining the
relative locations of specific properties with regard to the depicted
noise contours, or in interpreting the noise exposure maps to resolve
questions concerning, for example, which properties should be covered
by the provisions of section 47506 of the Act. These functions are
inseparable from the ultimate land use control and planning
responsibilities of local government. These local responsibilities are
not changed in any way under part 150 or through FAA's review of noise
exposure maps. Therefore, the responsibility for the detailing
overlaying of noise exposure contours onto the map depicting properties
on the surface rests exclusively with the airport operator that
submitted those maps, or with those public agencies and planning
agencies with which consultation is required under section 47503 of the
Act. The FAA has relied on the certification by the airport operator,
under section 150.21 of FAR part 150, that the statutorily required
consultation has been accomplished.
Copies of the full noise exposure map documentation and of the
FAA's evaluation of the maps are available for examination at the
following locations:
Federal Aviation Administration, Community and Environmental Needs
Division, APP-600, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region, Airports
Division, Room 3012, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Hawthorne, California
90261.
Scott Gray, Aviation Director, City of Scottsdale, Aviation
Department, 15000 N. Airport Drive Suite 200, Scottsdale, Arizona
85260.
Questions may be directed to the individual named above under the
heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Issued in Hawthorne, California, on January 21, 2005.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, AWP-600, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05-2231 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M