Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Portable Fuel Containers, 6352-6355 [05-2060]

Download as PDF 6352 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations governments as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4). This rule also does not require prior consultation with State, local, and tribal government officials as specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993) or Executive Order 13084 (64 FR 27655 (May 10, 1998), or involve special consideration of environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Because this action is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because EPA interprets E.O. 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5–501 of the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks. EPA’s compliance with these statutes and Executive Orders for the underlying rule is discussed in the July 1, 2004, Federal Register notice. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to make a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As stated previously, EPA has made such a good cause finding, including the reasons therefor, and established an effective date of February 7, 2005. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 9 Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:57 Feb 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 Dated: January 28, 2005. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division, Office of Information Collection. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 9 is amended as follows: I PART 9—[AMENDED] This direct final rule will be effective April 8, 2005, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 9, 2005. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. DATES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR– Authority: 7. U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136–136y; 15 U.S.C. 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2601–2671; 2004–ME–0003 by one of the following methods: 21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 348; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1318, 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 1321, 1326, 1330, 1342, 1344, 1345 (d) and https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the (e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR, 1971–1975 Comp. p. 973; 42 U.S.C 241, 242b, on-line instructions for submitting comments. 243, 246, 300f, 300f, 300g–1, 300g–2, 300g– 3, 300g–4, 300g–5, 300g–6, 300j–1, 300j–2, 2. Agency Web site: https:// 300j–3, 300j–4, 300j–9, 1857 et seq., 6901– docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional 6002k, 7401–7671q, 7542, 9601–9657, 11023, Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s 11048. electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA’s preferred method for I 2. In § 9.1 the table is amended by receiving comments. Once in the adding a new entry to read as follows: system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key § 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork in the appropriate RME Docket Reduction Act. identification number. Follow the on* * * * * line instructions for submitting comments. OMB control 40 CFR citation 3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov. No. 4. Fax: (617) 918–0661. 5. Mail: ‘‘RME ID Number R01–OAR– * * * * * 2004–ME–003’’ David Conroy, U.S. Determining Coformity of Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Part 93, subpart A .................. 2060–0561 Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023. * * * * * 6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: David Conroy, Unit [FR Doc. 05–2306 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am] Manager, Air Quality Planning, Office of BILLING CODE 6560–50–M Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), AGENCY Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such 40 CFR Part 52 deliveries are only accepted during the [R01–OAR–2004–ME–0003; A–1–FRL–7863– Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official 2] hours of business are Monday through Approval and Promulgation of Air Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Holidays. Portable Fuel Containers Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID AGENCY: Environmental Protection Number R01–OAR–2004–ME–0003. Agency (EPA). EPA’s policy is that all comments ACTION: Direct final rule. received will be included in the public SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State docket without change and may be Implementation Plan (SIP) revision made available online at https:// submitted by the State of Maine. This docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any revision establishes requirements to personal information provided, unless reduce volatile organic compound the comment includes information (VOC) emissions from portable fuel claimed to be Confidential Business containers. The intended effect of this Information (CBI) or other information action is to approve these requirements whose disclosure is restricted by statute. into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this Do not submit information that you action in accordance with the Clean Air consider to be CBI or otherwise Act (CAA). protected through Regional Material in 1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: I PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or email. The EPA RME website and the federal regulations.gov website are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the Regional Material in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal Holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Arnold, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023, (617) 918–1047, arnold.anne@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information? In addition to the publicly available docket materials available for inspection VerDate jul<14>2003 16:29 Feb 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 electronically in Regional Material in EDocket, and the hard copy available at the Regional Office, which are identified in the ADDRESSES section above, copies of the State submittal and EPA’s technical support document are also available for public inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the Bureau of Air Quality Control, Department of Environmental Protection, First Floor of the Tyson Building, Augusta Mental Health Institute Complex, Augusta, ME 04333– 0017. II. Rulemaking Information This section is organized as follows: A. What Action is EPA Taking? B. What Are the Requirements of Maine’s New Regulation? C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s Regulation? D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision? A. What Action Is EPA Taking? EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter 155, ‘‘Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,’’ and incorporating this regulation into the Maine SIP. B. What Are the Requirements of Maine’s New Regulation? Chapter 155 includes performance standards for portable fuel containers and spouts in order to ensure spill-proof systems. Chapter 155 prohibits any person to sell, supply, offer for sale, or manufacture for sale in Maine, on or after January 1, 2004, any portable fuel container or spout that does meet all of the specified performance standards. However, there is a one year sellthrough period whereby containers and spouts manufactured before January 1, 2004 may be sold, supplied, or offered for sale until January 1, 2005. The rule also includes the appropriate testing and recordkeeping requirements to ensure compliance with the specified performance standards. C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s Regulation? EPA has evaluated Maine’s Chapter 155 and has found that this regulation is consistent with EPA guidance and the OTC model rule for portable fuel containers. The specific requirements of the regulation and EPA’s evaluation of these requirements are detailed in a memorandum dated December 22, 2004, entitled ‘‘Technical Support Document—Maine—Portable Fuel Containers Regulation’’ (TSD). The TSD and Maine’s Chapter 155 are available in the docket supporting this action. As noted in the TSD, when Maine submitted this regulation for approval and incorporation by reference into the PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 6353 SIP, the state did not submit the word ‘‘or’’ in subsection 7(C) of Chapter 155.1 In adopting Chapter 155, Maine was responding to a comment from EPA on this subsection in which EPA made it clear that any alternative test methods would have to be approved by both Maine DEP and EPA. DEP inadvertently used the formulation ‘‘and/or’’ to respond to EPA’s comment, despite the fact that it is DEP’s intent and commitment to EPA that any alternative test methods will have to be approved by both DEP and EPA Therefore, DEP deleted the word ‘‘or’’ from subsection 7(C) when DEP submitted it to EPA for approval to clarify DEP’s intent in implementing this provision. The OTC (Ozone Transport Commission) has developed model rules for several VOC source categories, and the OTC states, including Maine, have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) committing to adopt these model rules. One of the categories for which a model rule has been developed is portable fuel containers. (See ‘‘OTC Model Rule: Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,’’ March 6, 2001.) The OTC model rule for portable fuel containers was based on a similar rule adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Compliance with CARB’s rule was due in January 2001. Several other OTC states have also recently adopted a portable fuel container rule based on the OTC model rule and EPA has already approved some of these states’ rules.2 D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision? The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This action will be effective April 8, 2005 without further notice unless the EPA receives adverse comments by March 9, 2005. If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will 1 Subsection 7(C) reads ‘‘Alternative methods that are shown to be accurate, precise and appropriate may be used upon written approval of the Department and/or EPA.’’ When submitting Chapter 155 to EPA for approval into the SIP, Maine deleted ‘‘/or’’ from this sentence. 2 For example, EPA approved the portable fuel container rules adopted by New York and Maryland on January 23, 2004 (69 FR 3237), and June 29, 2004 (69 FR 38848), respectively. E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 6354 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on April 8, 2005 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. III. Final Action EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter 155, ‘‘Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,’’ and incorporating this regulation into the Maine SIP. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4). This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various VerDate jul<14>2003 16:29 Feb 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 8, 2005. Interested parties should comment in response to the proposed rule rather than petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after the comment period allowed for in the proposal. PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: January 12, 2005. Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: I PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart U—Maine 2. Section 52.1020 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(53) to read as follows: I § 52.1020 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (53) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on December 29, 2003, October 22, 2004, and December 9, 2004. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Chapter 155 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, ‘‘Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,’’ effective in the State of Maine on July 14, 2004, with the exception of the word ‘‘or’’ in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP revision. (ii) Additional materials. (A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal. 3. In § 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is amended by adding a new state citation, 155, to read as follows: § 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine regulations. * E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM * 07FER1 * * * 6355 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 24 / Monday, February 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 52.1031.—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS State citation Title/Subject * 155 ............... Date adopted by State * Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control. * Date approved by EPA * 6/3/04 * 2/7/05 Federal Register citation * [Insert FR citation from published date]. * * 52.1020 * (c)(53) * * All of Chapter 155 is approved with the exception of the word ‘‘or’’ in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP revision. * * * Note.—1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section. [FR Doc. 05–2060 Filed 2–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [OAR–2003–0194; FRL–7869–7] RIN 2060–AL89 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Leather Finishing Operations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule; amendments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final action on amendments to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for leather finishing operations, which were issued on February 27, 2002, under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The direct final amendments clarify the frequency for categorizing leather product process types, modify the definition of ‘‘specialty leather,’’ add a definition for ‘‘vacuum mulling,’’ and add an alternative procedure for determining the actual monthly solvent loss from an affected source. We are issuing the amendments as a direct final rule, without prior proposal, because we view the revisions as noncontroversial and anticipate no significant adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to amend the national emission standards for leather finishing operations if significant adverse comments are filed. DATES: The direct final rule is effective on February 28, 2005 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February 17, 2005 or by February 22, 2005 if a public hearing is requested. If significant adverse comments are received, EPA VerDate jul<14>2003 16:29 Feb 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which provisions will become effective, and which provisions are being withdrawn due to adverse comment. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. OAR–2003– 0194, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web site: https:// www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: air-and-r-docket@epa.gov. • Fax: (202) 566–1741. • Mail: EPA Docket Center, EPA, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a duplicate copy, if possible. • Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation Docket, EPA, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room B–108, Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. We request that a separate copy also be sent to the contact person listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. OAR–2003–0194. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.epa.gov/ edocket, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET, regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA EDOCKET and the federal PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 regulations.gov websites are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit EDOCKET on-line or see the Federal Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102). Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in EDOCKET or in hardcopy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6352-6355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R01-OAR-2004-ME-0003; A-1-FRL-7863-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maine; Portable Fuel Containers

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
submitted by the State of Maine. This revision establishes requirements 
to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from portable fuel 
containers. The intended effect of this action is to approve these 
requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in 
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective April 8, 2005, unless 
EPA receives adverse comments by March 9, 2005. If adverse comments are 
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule 
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not 
take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in 
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2004-ME-0003 by one of the following 
methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    2. Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional Material 
in EDocket (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is 
EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, 
select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket 
identification number. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting 
comments.
    3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov.
    4. Fax: (617) 918-0661.
    5. Mail: ``RME ID Number R01-OAR-2004-ME-003'' David Conroy, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One 
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023.
    6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: David 
Conroy, Unit Manager, Air Quality Planning, Office of Ecosystem 
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England 
Regional Office, One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Boston, MA 
02114-2023. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional 
Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official 
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding 
federal Holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in EDocket 
(RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2004-ME-0003. EPA's policy is that all comments 
received will be included in the public docket without change and may 
be made available online at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including 
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes 
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not 
submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected 
through Regional Material in

[[Page 6353]]

EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA RME website and the 
federal regulations.gov website are ``anonymous access'' systems, which 
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you 
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment 
directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-
mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the 
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the 
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you 
include your name and other contact information in the body of your 
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic 
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of 
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly 
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at the Office of 
Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New 
England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA. 
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your 
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday 
through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal Holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Arnold, Air Quality Planning 
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional 
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023, 
(617) 918-1047, arnold.anne@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?

    In addition to the publicly available docket materials available 
for inspection electronically in Regional Material in EDocket, and the 
hard copy available at the Regional Office, which are identified in the 
ADDRESSES section above, copies of the State submittal and EPA's 
technical support document are also available for public inspection 
during normal business hours, by appointment at the Bureau of Air 
Quality Control, Department of Environmental Protection, First Floor of 
the Tyson Building, Augusta Mental Health Institute Complex, Augusta, 
ME 04333-0017.

II. Rulemaking Information

This section is organized as follows:
    A. What Action is EPA Taking?
    B. What Are the Requirements of Maine's New Regulation?
    C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine's Regulation?
    D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?

A. What Action Is EPA Taking?

    EPA is approving Maine's Chapter 155, ``Portable Fuel Container 
Spillage Control,'' and incorporating this regulation into the Maine 
SIP.

B. What Are the Requirements of Maine's New Regulation?

    Chapter 155 includes performance standards for portable fuel 
containers and spouts in order to ensure spill-proof systems. Chapter 
155 prohibits any person to sell, supply, offer for sale, or 
manufacture for sale in Maine, on or after January 1, 2004, any 
portable fuel container or spout that does meet all of the specified 
performance standards. However, there is a one year sell-through period 
whereby containers and spouts manufactured before January 1, 2004 may 
be sold, supplied, or offered for sale until January 1, 2005. The rule 
also includes the appropriate testing and recordkeeping requirements to 
ensure compliance with the specified performance standards.

C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine's Regulation?

    EPA has evaluated Maine's Chapter 155 and has found that this 
regulation is consistent with EPA guidance and the OTC model rule for 
portable fuel containers. The specific requirements of the regulation 
and EPA's evaluation of these requirements are detailed in a memorandum 
dated December 22, 2004, entitled ``Technical Support Document--Maine--
Portable Fuel Containers Regulation'' (TSD). The TSD and Maine's 
Chapter 155 are available in the docket supporting this action.
    As noted in the TSD, when Maine submitted this regulation for 
approval and incorporation by reference into the SIP, the state did not 
submit the word ``or'' in subsection 7(C) of Chapter 155.\1\ In 
adopting Chapter 155, Maine was responding to a comment from EPA on 
this subsection in which EPA made it clear that any alternative test 
methods would have to be approved by both Maine DEP and EPA. DEP 
inadvertently used the formulation ``and/or'' to respond to EPA's 
comment, despite the fact that it is DEP's intent and commitment to EPA 
that any alternative test methods will have to be approved by both DEP 
and EPA Therefore, DEP deleted the word ``or'' from subsection 7(C) 
when DEP submitted it to EPA for approval to clarify DEP's intent in 
implementing this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Subsection 7(C) reads ``Alternative methods that are shown 
to be accurate, precise and appropriate may be used upon written 
approval of the Department and/or EPA.'' When submitting Chapter 155 
to EPA for approval into the SIP, Maine deleted ``/or'' from this 
sentence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The OTC (Ozone Transport Commission) has developed model rules for 
several VOC source categories, and the OTC states, including Maine, 
have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) committing to adopt 
these model rules. One of the categories for which a model rule has 
been developed is portable fuel containers. (See ``OTC Model Rule: 
Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,'' March 6, 2001.)
    The OTC model rule for portable fuel containers was based on a 
similar rule adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). 
Compliance with CARB's rule was due in January 2001. Several other OTC 
states have also recently adopted a portable fuel container rule based 
on the OTC model rule and EPA has already approved some of these 
states' rules.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For example, EPA approved the portable fuel container rules 
adopted by New York and Maryland on January 23, 2004 (69 FR 3237), 
and June 29, 2004 (69 FR 38848), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?

    The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
adverse comments be filed. This action will be effective April 8, 2005 
without further notice unless the EPA receives adverse comments by 
March 9, 2005.
    If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document 
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will

[[Page 6354]]

not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting 
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public 
is advised that this rule will be effective on April 8, 2005 and no 
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Maine's Chapter 155, ``Portable Fuel Container 
Spillage Control,'' and incorporating this regulation into the Maine 
SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule 
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically 
significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 8, 2005. Interested 
parties should comment in response to the proposed rule rather than 
petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after the 
comment period allowed for in the proposal. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: January 12, 2005.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

0
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart U--Maine

0
2. Section 52.1020 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(53) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.1020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (53) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the 
Maine Department of Environmental Protection on December 29, 2003, 
October 22, 2004, and December 9, 2004.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Chapter 155 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection 
Regulations, ``Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,'' effective in 
the State of Maine on July 14, 2004, with the exception of the word 
``or'' in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP 
revision.
    (ii) Additional materials.
    (A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
    3. In Sec.  52.1031, Table 52.1031 is amended by adding a new state 
citation, 155, to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1031  EPA-approved Maine regulations.

* * * * *

[[Page 6355]]



                               Table 52.1031.--EPA-Approved Rules and Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Date        Date
  State citation     Title/Subject   adopted by   approved   Federal Register    52.1020
                                        State      by EPA         citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
155..............  Portable Fuel         6/3/04      2/7/05  [Insert FR           (c)(53)  All of Chapter 155 is
                    Container                                 citation from                 approved with the
                    Spillage                                  published date].              exception of the
                    Control.                                                                word ``or'' in
                                                                                            Subsection 7C which
                                                                                            Maine did not submit
                                                                                            as part of the SIP
                                                                                            revision.
 
                                                 * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note.--1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section.

[FR Doc. 05-2060 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.