Records Governing Off-the Record Communications; Public Notice, 6001-6002 [E5-445]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Notices
remote listening of the conference via
Real Audio or a Phone Bridge
Connection for a fee. Persons interested
in making arrangements should contact
David Reininger or Julia Morelli at the
Capitol Connection (703–993–3100) as
soon as possible or visit the Capitol
Connection Web site at https://
www.capitolconnection.org and click on
‘‘FERC.’’
For more information about the
conference, please contact Anna
Cochrane at (202) 502–6357,
anna.cochrane@ferc.gov or Sarah
McKinley at (202) 502–8004,
sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–441 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD05–1–000]
Principles for Efficient and Reliable
Reactive Power Supply and
Consumption; Notice of Technical
Conference
January 31, 2005.
Take notice that a technical
conference will be held on March 8,
2005, from approximately 9 a.m. until 5
p.m. (EST) in the Commission Meeting
Room on the second floor of the offices
of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC. All interested persons
may attend, and registration is not
required. Commissioners are expected
to participate.
The technical conference will address
specific issues raised in the staff report
regarding reactive power supply for the
nation’s bulk power that will be issued
on February 4, 2005. The goal of the
technical conference is to discuss the
proper regulatory policy toward reactive
power supply and consumption.
The Commission is now soliciting
nominations for speakers at the
technical conference. Persons wishing
to nominate themselves as speakers
should do so using this electronic link:
https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/
registration/rp-03-08-speaker-form.asp.
Such nominations must be made before
the close of business, Friday, February
18, 2005, so that an agenda for the
technical conference can be drafted and
published.
Transcripts of the conference will be
immediately available from Ace
Reporting Company (202–347–3700 or
1–800–336–6646) for a fee. They will be
available for the public on the
Commission’s eLibrary system seven
calendar days after FERC receives the
transcript. Additionally, Capitol
Connection offers the opportunity for
remote listening and viewing of the
conference. It is available for a fee, live
over the Internet, by phone or via
satellite. Persons interested in receiving
the broadcast, or who need information
on making arrangements should contact
David Reininger or Julia Morelli at the
Capitol Connection (703–993–3100) as
soon as possible or visit the Capitol
Connection Web site at https://
www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu and
click on ‘‘FERC.’’
FERC conferences are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations please send an e-mail
to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free
(866) 208–3372 (voice) or (202) 2081659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208–
2106 with the required
accommodations.
For more information about the
conference, please contact Derek
Bandera at (202) 502–8031
(Derek.bandera@ferc.gov) or Sarah
McKinley at (202) 502–8004
(sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov).
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–452 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM98–1–000]
Records Governing Off-the Record
Communications; Public Notice
January 28, 2005.
This constitutes notice, in accordance
with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt
of exempt and prohibited off-the-record
communications.
6001
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,
September 22, 1999) requires
Commission decisional employees, who
make or receive an exempt or prohibited
off-the-record communication relevant
to the merit’s of a contested on-therecord proceeding, to deliver a copy of
the communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication, to the Secretary.
Prohibited communications will be
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record
communications will be included in the
decisional record of the proceeding,
unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40
CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
The following is a list of exempt
communications recently received in
the Office of the Secretary. The
communications listed are grouped by
docket numbers. These filings are
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
(FERRIS) link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact
FERC, Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
Docket no.
Date filed
Presenter or requester
Exempt:
1. CP04–36–000 .........................................
2. CP04–36–000, ........................................
3. CP04–37–000 .........................................
1–26–05 ...........................................................
1–27–05 ...........................................................
1–24–05 ...........................................................
Hon. Patrick C. Lynch
Hon. Ranch Kimball
Hon. Victor G. Carrillo, Hon. Michael Williams,
Hon. Charles R. Matthews.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:52 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
6002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Notices
Docket no.
Date filed
4. CP04–37–000 .........................................
5. CP04–293–000, CP04–223–000, CP04–
36–000, CP04–41–000.
6. CP04–293–000, CP04–223–000, CP04–
36–000, CP04–41–000.
7. CP04–386–000, CP04–400–000 ............
8. CP04–386–000,CP04–400–000 .............
9. CP05–3–000 ...........................................
10. CP05–3–000 .........................................
11. CP05–19–000 .......................................
12. Project No. 1971–079 ...........................
13. Project No. 2150–033 ...........................
14. Project No. 2237–013 ...........................
Presenter or requester
1–24–05 ...........................................................
1–18–05 ...........................................................
Hon. John Cornyn.
Hon. Jack Reed.
1–24–05 ...........................................................
Hon. Lincoln Chafee.
1–18–05
1–26–05
1–18–05
1–18–05
1–18–05
1–24–05
1–18–05
1–12–05
Jennifer Kerrigan.
Jennifer Kerrigan.
Monica DeAngelo.
Monica DeAngelo.
Jennifer Kerrigan.
Steven A. Ellis.
Kenneth L. Brettmann
Nicholas Jayjack/Jim Long, et al. 1
(1–13–05 Memo to file) ....................
(1–24–05 Memo to file) ....................
(Memo to file re: 1–12–05 Mtg.) .......
(Memo to file re: 1–13–05 Mtg.) .......
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
1 Memo to File from Nicholas Jayjack attaching email communications and documents provided to the Study Dispute Resolution Panel for the
Morgan Falls Hydroelectric Project proceeding.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–445 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
the Dow Chemical Company’s facilities
in Plaquemine, Iberville Parish,
Louisiana. Pursuant to section 505(b)(2)
of the Clean Air Act (Act), the petitioner
may seek judicial review of this petition
response in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Any
petition must be filed within 60 days of
the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
307(d) of the Act.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM05–2–000]
Policy for Selective Discounting by
Natural Gas Pipelines; Errata Notice
January 26, 2005.
On January 25, 2005, the Commission
issued a Notice of Extension of Time in
the above-docketed proceeding. The
date for filing comments should be
changed from ‘‘May 2, 2005’’ to ‘‘March
2, 2005’’. Comments on the NOI are due
March 2, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–423 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
Ms.
Mary Stanton, Air Permits Section,
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–8377, or e-mail at
Stanton.Marya@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permits; Dow
Chemical Company
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition
to object to State operating permits.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA Administrator
signed an order, dated December 22,
2004, denying the petition to object to
State operating permits issued by the
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ) for the Light
Hydrocarbon III and Cellulose plants at
18:52 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review,
and, as appropriate, object to operating
permits proposed by State permitting
authorities under Title V of the Act, 42
U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of
the Act authorizes any person to
petition the EPA Administrator within
60 days after the expiration of this
review period to object to State
operating permits if EPA has not
objected on its own initiative. Petitions
must be based only on objections to the
permit that were raised with reasonable
specificity during the public comment
period provided by the State, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FRL–7869–4]
VerDate jul<14>2003
You may review copies of
the final order, the petition, and other
supporting information at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733. If you wish to examine these
documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before
visiting day. The final order is also
available electronically at the following
address: https://www.epa.gov/region07/
programs/artd/air/title5/petitiondb/
petitiondb2002.htm.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
The Louisiana Environmental Action
Network (LEAN) submitted a petition
requesting that the Administrator object
to title V operating permits issued by
LDEQ to the Dow Chemical Company,
for modifications to its Light
Hydrocarbon III and Cellulose Plants at
Dow’s facility in Plaquemine, Iberville
Parish, Louisiana.
The petition maintains that the
permits are inconsistent with the Act
because:
(1) The emission reduction credits
(ERCs) used as offsets are not valid
because the underlying emission
reductions were required, and not
surplus;
(2) The ERCs are not valid because
LDEQ improperly concluded that the
underlying emission reductions
occurred within 10 years of the date the
offsets were used;
(3) Dow’s application for ERCs was
not timely under the requirements of the
Louisiana Administrative Code;
(4) LDEQ’s Basis For Decision on the
ERC application failed to respond to all
reasonable public comments;
(5) The permits should have required
controls designed to achieve the Lowest
Achievable Emission Rate (LAER)
because Dow had insufficient offsets to
avoid LAER;
(6) Offsets should have been required
for 33.34 tons per year of emission
increases of volatile organic compounds
from emission points C6 ,C7, and LN,
and LDEQ was inconsistent in granting
those emission increases while also
maintaining that the facilities were in
compliance with the previously
permitted emissions limitations; and
(7) In establishing the baseline for
sulfur dioxide emissions for purposes of
determining whether the permits
constituted a significant modification,
LDEQ failed to either use actual
emissions over the preceding two years,
or make a determination that a different
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6001-6002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-445]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM98-1-000]
Records Governing Off-the Record Communications; Public Notice
January 28, 2005.
This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or prohibited off-
the-record communication relevant to the merit's of a contested on-the-
record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if written,
or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to the
Secretary.
Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-
decisional file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional
record of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the
prohibited communication and any responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication
will not be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision.
Parties to a proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any
facts or contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication,
and may request that the Commission place the prohibited communication
and responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will
grant such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires.
Any person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the
decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with
a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
The following is a list of exempt communications recently received
in the Office of the Secretary. The communications listed are grouped
by docket numbers. These filings are available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
(FERRIS) link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance,
please contact FERC, Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or
toll free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presenter or
Docket no. Date filed requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exempt:
1. CP04-36-000.......... 1-26-05............. Hon. Patrick C.
Lynch
2. CP04-36-000,......... 1-27-05............. Hon. Ranch Kimball
3. CP04-37-000.......... 1-24-05............. Hon. Victor G.
Carrillo, Hon.
Michael Williams,
Hon. Charles R.
Matthews.
[[Page 6002]]
4. CP04-37-000.......... 1-24-05............. Hon. John Cornyn.
5. CP04-293-000, CP04- 1-18-05............. Hon. Jack Reed.
223-000, CP04-36-000,
CP04-41-000.
6. CP04-293-000, CP04- 1-24-05............. Hon. Lincoln Chafee.
223-000, CP04-36-000,
CP04-41-000.
7. CP04-386-000, CP04- 1-18-05 (1-13-05 Jennifer Kerrigan.
400-000. Memo to file).
8. CP04-386-000,CP04-400- 1-26-05 (1-24-05 Jennifer Kerrigan.
000. Memo to file).
9. CP05-3-000........... 1-18-05 (Memo to Monica DeAngelo.
file re: 1-12-05
Mtg.).
10. CP05-3-000.......... 1-18-05 (Memo to Monica DeAngelo.
file re: 1-13-05
Mtg.).
11. CP05-19-000......... 1-18-05............. Jennifer Kerrigan.
12. Project No. 1971-079 1-24-05............. Steven A. Ellis.
13. Project No. 2150-033 1-18-05............. Kenneth L. Brettmann
14. Project No. 2237-013 1-12-05............. Nicholas Jayjack/Jim
Long, et al. \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Memo to File from Nicholas Jayjack attaching email communications
and documents provided to the Study Dispute Resolution Panel for the
Morgan Falls Hydroelectric Project proceeding.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-445 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
