Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 5944-5946 [05-2153]

Download as PDF 5944 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 23 Friday, February 4, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 993 [Docket No. FV05–993–1 PR] Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the Prune Marketing Committee (committee) under Marketing Order No. 993 for the 2004–05 and subsequent crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes. The committee locally administers the marketing order which regulates the handling of dried prunes grown in California. Authorization to assess dried prune handlers enables the committee to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The committee recommended a higher assessment rate because the 2004–05 crop is very small, and the higher assessment rate is needed to generate funds to meet program expenses and provide an adequate financial reserve. The crop year begins August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. DATES: Comments must be received by March 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or e-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be VerDate jul<14>2003 15:38 Feb 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Sasselli, Program Analyst, or Terry Vawter, Marketing Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone: (559) 487– 5901; Fax (559) 487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 110 and Marketing Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), regulating the handling of dried prunes grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The marketing agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601– 674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order 12866. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California dried prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable dried prunes beginning August 1, 2004, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the committee for the 2004–05 and subsequent crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes. The California dried prune marketing order provides authority for the committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the committee are producers and handlers of California dried prunes. They are familiar with the committee’s needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. The committee recommended an assessment rate of $4.00 per salable ton of prunes for the 2004–05 and subsequent crop years on June 23, 2004. USDA approved that assessment rate and it was published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2004 (69 FR 55733). That assessment rate was to continue in effect from crop year to crop year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the committee or other information available to USDA. At the time of the June 23, 2004, meeting, the E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM 04FEP1 5945 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules prune crop was expected to be 68,950 salable tons. The committee met again on December 8, 2004, and unanimously recommended an increased assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes and an increase in 2004–05 expenditures to $283,218. At its June 23, 2004, meeting, the committee recommended expenditures totaling $275,800. The proposed assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is $2.00 higher than the rate currently in effect, and $4.00 per ton more than the assessment rate in effect during the 2003–2004 crop year. The committee recommended a higher assessment rate because a very small crop was received by handlers during the crop year. The salable prune production this crop year is expected to be only 47,203 tons, the smallest crop since 1918. The assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is expected to provide sufficient funds for committee operations this year and provide an adequate financial reserve. In comparison, the budgeted expenditures for the 2003–2004 crop year were $322,022 and the assessment rate was $2.00 per salable ton of prunes, based upon an estimated crop of 170,500 salable tons. The following table compares the proposed major budget expenditures recommended by the committee on December 8, 2004, and major budget expenditures in the previouslyapproved 2004–05 budget. The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite period, the committee would continue to meet prior to or during each crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of committee meetings are available from the committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate committee recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The committee’s 2004–05 budget and those for subsequent crop years would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order Approved Proposed that small businesses will not be unduly Budget expense budget budget or disproportionately burdened. categories 2004–05 2004–05 Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are Total Personnel Salaries ........................ $181,335 $178,335 unique in that they are brought about Total Operating Exthrough group action of essentially penses ................... 84,931 75,431 small entities acting on their own Reserve for Continbehalf. Thus, both statutes have small gencies .................. 9,534 29,452 entity orientation and compatibility. There are approximately 1,100 The assessment rate recommended by producers of dried prunes in the the committee was derived by dividing production area and approximately 22 anticipated expenses by the estimated handlers subject to regulation under the salable tons of California dried prunes. marketing order. The Small Business Production of dried prunes for the year Administration (13 CFR 121.201) is estimated to be 47,203 salable tons, defines small agricultural producers as which should provide $283,218 in those whose annual receipts are less assessment income. Income derived than $750,000, and small agricultural from handler assessments is expected to service firms as those whose annual be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. receipts are less than $5,000,000. The committee is authorized to use Eight of the 22 handlers (36.4 percent) excess assessment funds from the 2003– shipped over $5,000,000 of dried prunes 04 crop year (currently estimated at and could be considered large handlers $96,702) for up to 5 months beyond the by the Small Business Administration. end of the crop year to meet 2004–05 Fourteen of the 22 handlers (63.6 crop year expenses. At the end of the 5percent) shipped under $5,000,000 of month period, the committee must dried prunes and could be considered refund or credit excess funds to small handlers. An estimated 32 handlers, as prescribed by § 993.81(c). producers, or less than 3 percent of the VerDate jul<14>2003 15:38 Feb 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 1,100 total producers, would be considered large growers with annual incomes over $750,000. The majority of handlers and producers of California dried prunes may be classified as small entities. This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the committee and collected from handlers for the 2004–05 and subsequent crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes. The committee unanimously recommended revised 2004–05 expenditures of $283,218 and an increased assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes at the meeting on December 8, 2004. The recommended expenditures are slightly higher than the Committee’s initial estimate of $275,800 for 2004–05. The proposed assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is $2.00 higher than the current rate. The quantity of salable dried prunes for the 2004–05 crop year is now estimated at 47,203 salable tons. The Committee’s earlier estimate was 68,950 salable tons. The $6.00 rate should provide $283,218 in assessment income (6 × 47,203) and be adequate to meet this year’s expenses. The following table compares the proposed major budget expenditures recommended by the committee on December 8, 2004 and major budget expenditures in the previouslyapproved 2004–05 budget. Budget expense categories Approved budget 2004–05 Proposed budget 2004–05 Total Salaries ............ Operating Expenses Reserve for Contingencies .................. $181,335 84,931 $178,331 75,431 9,534 29,452 Prior to arriving at its budget of $283,218, the committee considered information from various sources, such as the committee’s Executive Subcommittee. An alternative to this action would be to continue with the $4.00 per ton assessment rate. However, an assessment rate of $4.00 per ton in combination with the estimated crop of 47,203 salable tons would not generate sufficient monies to fund all the budget items for 2004–05 and provide an adequate financial reserve. The assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes was determined by dividing the total recommended budget by the estimated salable dried prunes. The committee is authorized to use excess assessment funds from the 2003– 04 crop year (currently estimated at $96,702) for up to 5 months beyond the end of the crop year to fund 2004–05 crop year expenses. At the end of the 5month period, the committee must E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM 04FEP1 5946 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules refund or credit excess funds to handlers, as prescribed by § 993.81(c). Anticipated assessment income collected during 2004–05 would be adequate to cover authorized expenses. The grower price for the 2004–05 crop year is expected to average about $750 per salable ton of dried prunes. Based on an estimated 47,203 salable tons of dried prunes, assessment revenue during the 2004–05 crop year is expected to be less than 1 percent of the total expected grower revenue. This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order. In addition, the committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the California dried prune industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in committee deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, the December 8, 2004, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses. This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California dried prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/ fv/moab/html. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate because: (1) The 2004–05 crop year began on August 1, 2004, and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each crop year apply to all assessable prunes handled during such crop year; (2) the committee needs to have sufficient VerDate jul<14>2003 15:38 Feb 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 funds to pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993 Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 993—DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 993 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Section 993.347 is revised to read as follows: § 993.347 Assessment rate. On and after August 1, 2004, an assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is established for California dried prunes. Dated: January 31, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–2153 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 12 CFR Chap. VII Request for Burden Reduction Recommendation; Safety and Soundness and Anti-Money Laundering Regulations; Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 Review National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The NCUA Board is continuing its review of its regulations to identify outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulatory requirements imposed on federallyinsured credit unions pursuant to the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA). Today, NCUA requests comments and suggestions on ways to reduce burden in rules that govern safety and soundness and anti-money laundering, consistent with our statutory obligations. All comments are welcome. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 We will analyze the comments received and propose burden reducing changes to our regulations where appropriate. Some suggestions for burden reduction might require legislative changes. Where legislative changes would be required, we will consider the suggestions in recommending appropriate changes to Congress. DATES: Comment must be received on or before May 5, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods (Please send comments by one method only): • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • NCUA Web Site: https:// www.ncua.gov/ RegulationsOpinionsLaws/ proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your name] Comments on Fourth EGRPRA Notice’’ in the e-mail subject line. • Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the subject line described above for e-mail. • Mail: Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314– 3428. • Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address. Public inspection: All public comments are available on the agency’s Web site at https://www.ncua.gov/ RegulationsOpinionsLaws/comments as submitted, except as may not be possible for technical reasons. Public comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Paper copies of comments may be inspected in NCUA’s law library, at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, by appointment weekdays between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. To make an appointment, call (703) 518–6546 or send an e-mail to OGC_Mail@ncua.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross P. Kendall, Staff Attorney, Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone (703) 518–6562. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction NCUA seeks public comment and suggestions on ways it can reduce regulatory burdens consistent with our statutory obligations. Today, we request input to help identify which requirements in two regulatory categories—Safety and Soundness and Anti-Money Laundering—are outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome. E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM 04FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5944-5946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2153]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70 , No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 5944]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 993

[Docket No. FV05-993-1 PR]


Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for 
the Prune Marketing Committee (committee) under Marketing Order No. 993 
for the 2004-05 and subsequent crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 per ton 
of salable dried prunes. The committee locally administers the 
marketing order which regulates the handling of dried prunes grown in 
California. Authorization to assess dried prune handlers enables the 
committee to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to 
administer the program. The committee recommended a higher assessment 
rate because the 2004-05 crop is very small, and the higher assessment 
rate is needed to generate funds to meet program expenses and provide 
an adequate financial reserve. The crop year begins August 1 and ends 
July 31. The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless 
modified, suspended, or terminated.

DATES: Comments must be received by March 7, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, 
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or e-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, 
or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the 
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of 
the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Sasselli, Program Analyst, or 
Terry Vawter, Marketing Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, 
Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 
102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone: (559) 487-5901; Fax (559) 
487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order 
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; 
telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938.
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
Agreement No. 110 and Marketing Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR 
part 993), regulating the handling of dried prunes grown in California, 
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing agreement and 
order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 
``Act.''
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 
dried prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer 
the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the 
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all 
assessable dried prunes beginning August 1, 2004, and continue until 
amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State 
or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the 
committee for the 2004-05 and subsequent crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 
per ton of salable dried prunes.
    The California dried prune marketing order provides authority for 
the committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget 
of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 
program. The members of the committee are producers and handlers of 
California dried prunes. They are familiar with the committee's needs 
and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are 
thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment 
rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public 
meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to 
participate and provide input.
    The committee recommended an assessment rate of $4.00 per salable 
ton of prunes for the 2004-05 and subsequent crop years on June 23, 
2004. USDA approved that assessment rate and it was published in the 
Federal Register on September 28, 2004 (69 FR 55733). That assessment 
rate was to continue in effect from crop year to crop year unless 
modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and 
information submitted by the committee or other information available 
to USDA. At the time of the June 23, 2004, meeting, the

[[Page 5945]]

prune crop was expected to be 68,950 salable tons.
    The committee met again on December 8, 2004, and unanimously 
recommended an increased assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable 
dried prunes and an increase in 2004-05 expenditures to $283,218. At 
its June 23, 2004, meeting, the committee recommended expenditures 
totaling $275,800. The proposed assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is 
$2.00 higher than the rate currently in effect, and $4.00 per ton more 
than the assessment rate in effect during the 2003-2004 crop year.
    The committee recommended a higher assessment rate because a very 
small crop was received by handlers during the crop year. The salable 
prune production this crop year is expected to be only 47,203 tons, the 
smallest crop since 1918. The assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is 
expected to provide sufficient funds for committee operations this year 
and provide an adequate financial reserve.
    In comparison, the budgeted expenditures for the 2003-2004 crop 
year were $322,022 and the assessment rate was $2.00 per salable ton of 
prunes, based upon an estimated crop of 170,500 salable tons.
    The following table compares the proposed major budget expenditures 
recommended by the committee on December 8, 2004, and major budget 
expenditures in the previously-approved 2004-05 budget.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Approved   Proposed
            Budget expense  categories                budget     budget
                                                     2004-05    2004-05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Personnel Salaries..........................   $181,335   $178,335
Total Operating Expenses..........................     84,931     75,431
Reserve for Contingencies.........................      9,534     29,452
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The assessment rate recommended by the committee was derived by 
dividing anticipated expenses by the estimated salable tons of 
California dried prunes. Production of dried prunes for the year is 
estimated to be 47,203 salable tons, which should provide $283,218 in 
assessment income. Income derived from handler assessments is expected 
to be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
    The committee is authorized to use excess assessment funds from the 
2003-04 crop year (currently estimated at $96,702) for up to 5 months 
beyond the end of the crop year to meet 2004-05 crop year expenses. At 
the end of the 5-month period, the committee must refund or credit 
excess funds to handlers, as prescribed by Sec.  993.81(c).
    The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely 
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation 
and information submitted by the committee or other available 
information.
    Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite 
period, the committee would continue to meet prior to or during each 
crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
times of committee meetings are available from the committee or USDA. 
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate committee 
recommendations and other available information to determine whether 
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would 
be undertaken as necessary. The committee's 2004-05 budget and those 
for subsequent crop years would be reviewed and, as appropriate, 
approved by USDA.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
entity orientation and compatibility.
    There are approximately 1,100 producers of dried prunes in the 
production area and approximately 22 handlers subject to regulation 
under the marketing order. The Small Business Administration (13 CFR 
121.201) defines small agricultural producers as those whose annual 
receipts are less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms 
as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000.
    Eight of the 22 handlers (36.4 percent) shipped over $5,000,000 of 
dried prunes and could be considered large handlers by the Small 
Business Administration. Fourteen of the 22 handlers (63.6 percent) 
shipped under $5,000,000 of dried prunes and could be considered small 
handlers. An estimated 32 producers, or less than 3 percent of the 
1,100 total producers, would be considered large growers with annual 
incomes over $750,000. The majority of handlers and producers of 
California dried prunes may be classified as small entities.
    This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the 
committee and collected from handlers for the 2004-05 and subsequent 
crop years from $4.00 to $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes. The 
committee unanimously recommended revised 2004-05 expenditures of 
$283,218 and an increased assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable 
dried prunes at the meeting on December 8, 2004. The recommended 
expenditures are slightly higher than the Committee's initial estimate 
of $275,800 for 2004-05. The proposed assessment rate of $6.00 per ton 
is $2.00 higher than the current rate. The quantity of salable dried 
prunes for the 2004-05 crop year is now estimated at 47,203 salable 
tons. The Committee's earlier estimate was 68,950 salable tons. The 
$6.00 rate should provide $283,218 in assessment income (6 x 47,203) 
and be adequate to meet this year's expenses.
    The following table compares the proposed major budget expenditures 
recommended by the committee on December 8, 2004 and major budget 
expenditures in the previously-approved 2004-05 budget.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Approved   Proposed
            Budget expense  categories                budget     budget
                                                     2004-05    2004-05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Salaries....................................   $181,335   $178,331
Operating Expenses................................     84,931     75,431
Reserve for Contingencies.........................      9,534     29,452
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Prior to arriving at its budget of $283,218, the committee 
considered information from various sources, such as the committee's 
Executive Subcommittee. An alternative to this action would be to 
continue with the $4.00 per ton assessment rate. However, an assessment 
rate of $4.00 per ton in combination with the estimated crop of 47,203 
salable tons would not generate sufficient monies to fund all the 
budget items for 2004-05 and provide an adequate financial reserve. The 
assessment rate of $6.00 per ton of salable dried prunes was determined 
by dividing the total recommended budget by the estimated salable dried 
prunes.
    The committee is authorized to use excess assessment funds from the 
2003-04 crop year (currently estimated at $96,702) for up to 5 months 
beyond the end of the crop year to fund 2004-05 crop year expenses. At 
the end of the 5-month period, the committee must

[[Page 5946]]

refund or credit excess funds to handlers, as prescribed by Sec.  
993.81(c). Anticipated assessment income collected during 2004-05 would 
be adequate to cover authorized expenses.
    The grower price for the 2004-05 crop year is expected to average 
about $750 per salable ton of dried prunes. Based on an estimated 
47,203 salable tons of dried prunes, assessment revenue during the 
2004-05 crop year is expected to be less than 1 percent of the total 
expected grower revenue.
    This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on 
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, 
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the 
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs 
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the 
marketing order. In addition, the committee's meeting was widely 
publicized throughout the California dried prune industry and all 
interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate 
in committee deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, 
the December 8, 2004, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, 
both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. 
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the 
regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small 
businesses.
    This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California dried 
prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports 
and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements 
and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
    USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab/html. Any questions about the compliance 
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate 
because: (1) The 2004-05 crop year began on August 1, 2004, and the 
marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each crop year 
apply to all assessable prunes handled during such crop year; (2) the 
committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are 
incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this 
action which was unanimously recommended by the committee at a public 
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past 
years.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993

    Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA

    1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 993 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

    2. Section 993.347 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  993.347  Assessment rate.

    On and after August 1, 2004, an assessment rate of $6.00 per ton is 
established for California dried prunes.

    Dated: January 31, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-2153 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.