Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Joint Water Agency Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP): Subregional Plan and Subarea Plans, San Diego, CA, 6033-6034 [05-2141]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Notices
Alabama, in Baldwin and Mobile
Counties. The refuge is divided into five
separate management units along the
Fort Morgan Peninsula and Little
Dauphin Island. Although the refuge
was established in 1980, to date, only
6,978 acres have been acquired within
the acquisition boundary totaling
approximately 12,570 acres, including
the 575 acres leased from the State of
Alabama. The Service has management
jurisdiction along the shoreline above
mean high tide except on Little Dauphin
Island, which contains 560 acres of
submerged bottoms. The potential
wildlife habitat values of beach/dune,
maritime forest, and estuarine habitats
provided the impetus to purchase the
properties.
Management efforts since 1985 have
emphasized acquiring land, securing
staff to operate the refuge, and initiating
conservation programs that benefit
endangered wildlife species. However,
Service acquisition of key properties,
such as inholdings and beach/dune
habitat, may not be realized within the
15-year planning period due to budget
constraints and landowner preferences.
The five units within the acquisition
boundary have a significant ‘‘edge,’’
which contributes to the predation of
birds, sea turtles, and beach mice. Edge
effect is the tendency of a transitional
zone between communities to support
more species and higher population
densities than any of the surrounding
communities.
Current conservation management
projects for the refuge include:
recruiting and training staff and
improving existing facilities; managing
habitats to reduce the threats and
problems associated with species of
concern; acquiring land to complete
refuge boundaries; assisting in sea turtle
and Alabama beach mouse recovery;
and defining research within the beach/
dune area and involving partners and
volunteers to accomplish this research.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Cail, Refuge Manager, Bon
Secour National Wildlife Refuge,
telephone: 251/540–7720; fax: 251/540–
7301, or mail (write to Refuge Manager
at address in ADDRESSES section).
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Pub. L.
105–57.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05–2182 Filed 2–3–02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:52 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Joint Water
Agency Natural Communities
Conservation Plan (NCCP):
Subregional Plan and Subarea Plans,
San Diego, CA
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Notice of intent.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
advises the public that we intend to
gather information necessary to prepare,
in coordination with the Joint Water
Agency (consisting of Helix Water
District, Padre Dam Municipal Water
District, Santa Fe Irrigation District, and
the Sweetwater Authority) (hereafter
collectively referred to as the
Applicants), a joint Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for a Natural
Communities Conservation Program
Subregional Plan (SRP) and three
Subarea Plans (SAPs). The combination
of the Joint Water Agency SRP and
individual SAPs would serve as a
multiple species Habitat Conservation
Plan under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Federal Endangered Species Act, as
amended in 1982 (ESA).
The Service provides this notice to:
(1) Describe the proposed action and
possible alternatives; (2) advise other
Federal and State agencies, affected
Tribes, and the public of our intent to
prepare an EIS/EIR; (3) announce the
initiation of a public scoping period;
and (4) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
alternatives to be included in the EIS/
EIR.
DATES: Public scoping meetings will be
held on: Tuesday, February 8, 2005 from
4 p.m. to 7 p.m. and Wednesday,
February 9, 2005 from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
Written comments should be received
on or before March 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be
held at the following locations: (1)
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, at the
Sweetwater Authority Reynolds
Desalination Facility, 3066 North
Second Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91912;
and (2) Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at
the Padre Dam Municipal Water District
Board Room, 10887 Woodside Avenue,
Santee, CA 92072.
Information, written comments, or
questions related to the preparation of
the EIS/EIR and NEPA process should
be submitted to Erin Fernandez, Fish
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6033
and Wildlife Biologist, Carlsbad Fish
and Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Carlsbad, California 92009
(facsimile 760–431–5902).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Fernandez at (760) 431–9440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reasonable Accommodation
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should
contact Erin Fernandez as soon as
possible (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). In order to allow sufficient
time to process requests, please call no
later than 1 week before the public
meeting. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Background
Section 9 of the Federal ESA (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of a fish
or wildlife species listed as endangered
or threatened. Under the ESA, the
following activities are defined as take:
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture or collect
listed animal species, or attempt to
engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C.
1538). However, under section 10(a) of
the ESA, we may issue permits to
authorize ‘‘incidental take’’ of listed
species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is defined by
the ESA as take that is incidental to, and
not the purpose of, carrying out an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
governing permits for threatened species
and endangered species, respectively,
are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 50 CFR 17.22.
Take of listed plant species is not
prohibited under the ESA and cannot be
authorized under a section 10 permit.
We propose to include plant species on
the permit in recognition of the
conservation benefits provided for them
under the plan.
The purpose of the EIS/EIR is to
analyze the impacts of the proposed
implementation of the SRP and three
SAPs. The Federal need for the SRP and
three SAPs is to meet the criteria for
incidental take authorization of species
on the covered species list.
The proposed SRP would
comprehensively address how
participating water agencies will
manage their lands to conserve natural
habitats and species while continuing to
provide their mandated water services
to the public. The proposed SRP would
serve as an ‘‘umbrella document’’ to
guide the preparation of Natural
Communities Conservation Program
subarea plans by each participating
water agency. The combination of the
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
6034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Notices
Joint Water Agency SRP and individual
SAPs would serve as a multiple species
Habitat Conservation Plan under
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Federal ESA.
The Service and the California
Department of Fish and Game may issue
take authorization permits for
individual SAPs with conditions or
modifications. The proposed SRP would
consist of several key components
including an implementation process
and structure, preserve management
guidelines, and a covered species list. A
total of 80 species are proposed for
coverage under the SRP. The proposed
SRP would strive to anticipate and
cover the effects on biological resources
of all currently foreseeable actions of the
participating water agencies over the
next 75 years. The proposed SRP would
address the following groups of
foreseeable projects and covered
actions: facilities operation and
maintenance, planned or conceptual
projects, and potential future projects.
The proposed planning area
encompasses approximately 8,600 acres
(13.5 square miles) of land in northern,
eastern, and southern San Diego County
cumulatively owned by the
participating water agencies. These
lands are located in the unincorporated
County area, and in the cities of Santee,
El Cajon, La Mesa, and Chula Vista. In
general, ownerships consist of land used
directly for water production,
collection, storage, treatment, and
distribution as well as easements used
primarily for water and wastewater
distribution pipelines. These facilities
consist of open water reservoirs, water
tanks, water, reclaimed water, and
wastewater treatment plants, pump
stations, pipelines, and access roads. In
addition, the agencies also have
maintenance trails and roadways,
maintenance yards, and sedimentation
ponds. In some situations, watershed
protection lands provide recreational
facilities, including camp grounds, golf
courses, boat docks and ramps, fishing
piers, hiking trails, and interpretive
signage. These lands are operated in
cooperation with other agencies such as
the County and City of San Diego.
Components of the proposed
conservation program are now under
consideration by the Service and the
Applicants. These components will
likely include avoidance and
minimization measures, monitoring,
adaptive management, and mitigation
measures consisting of preservation,
restoration, and enhancement of habitat.
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report
The Applicants, the Service, and the
California Department of Fish and Game
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:52 Feb 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
have selected A.D. Hinshaw Associates
to prepare the Draft EIS/EIR. The joint
document will be prepared in
compliance with NEPA and the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Although A.D. Hinshaw
Associates will prepare the EIS/EIR, the
Service will be responsible for the scope
and content of the document for NEPA
purposes, and the Sweetwater Authority
will be responsible for the scope and
content of the EIR for CEQA purposes.
The EIS/EIR will consider the
proposed action (i.e., the issuance of a
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit under the
Federal ESA), and a reasonable range of
alternatives. A detailed description of
the proposed action and alternatives
will be included in the EIS/EIR. It is
anticipated that several alternatives will
be developed, which may vary by the
level of conservation, impacts caused by
the proposed activities, permit area,
covered species, or a combination of
these factors. Additionally, a No Action
alternative will be considered. Under
the No Action alternative, the Service
would not issue a section 10(a)(1)(B)
permit.
The EIS/EIR will also identify
potentially significant impacts on
biological resources, recreation, and
other environmental issues that could
occur directly or indirectly with
implementation of the proposed action
and alternatives. For all potentially
significant impacts, the EIS/EIR will
identify mitigation measures where
feasible to reduce these impacts to a
level below significance.
Environmental review of the EIS/EIR
will be conducted in accordance with
the requirements of NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1500–1508), other
applicable regulations, and Service
procedures for compliance with those
regulations. This notice is being
furnished in accordance with 40 CFR
1501.7 of NEPA to obtain suggestions
and information from other agencies
and the public on the scope of issues
and alternatives to be addressed in the
EIS/EIR. The primary purpose of the
scoping process is to identify important
issues raised by the public, related to
the proposed action. Written comments
from interested parties are invited to
ensure that the full range of issues
related to the proposed action is
identified. While written comments are
encouraged, we will accept both written
and oral comments at the public
meeting. In addition, you may submit
written comments by mail or facsimile
transmission (see ADDRESSES). All
comments received, including names
and addresses, will become part of the
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
official administrative record, and may
be made available to the public.
Dated: January 31, 2005.
Ken McDermond,
Deputy Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 05–2141 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–020–05–1610–DO–036E]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Resource
Management Plan Revision and
Environmental Impact Statement for
Eastern Montana
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior, Montana, Miles City Field
Office.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
Resource Management Plan Revision
and Environmental Impact Statement
for Eastern Montana, initiate public
scoping and request comments on
Planning Criteria.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701), as
amended; the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321), as
amended; and the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
will revise two Resource Management
Plans (RMPs) by combining the Powder
River and Big Dry RMPs (to be called
the ‘‘Miles City Field Office RMP’’) and
preparing an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to evaluate the effects of
land and mineral management options.
The RMP and EIS are scheduled for
completion by December 2007.
DATES: Written and electronic comments
on the scope of the RMP, preliminary
issues, and planning criteria may be
submitted for 30 days from the date of
this notice. Public scoping meetings will
be held in Ashland, Baker, Broadus,
Glendive, Jordan, Miles City, Terry,
Billings and Sidney, Montana. Meeting
locations and dates for each town will
be announced through local news
media, newsletters and the BLM public
outreach Web site https://
www.mt.blm.gov/mcfo/.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://milescityrmp.com.
Mail: ‘‘Miles City RMP Comments’’,
P.O. Box 219, Miles City, MT 59301–
0219.
Fax: (918) 382–7582.
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6033-6034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2141]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Joint
Water Agency Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP): Subregional
Plan and Subarea Plans, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) advises the public that we
intend to gather information necessary to prepare, in coordination with
the Joint Water Agency (consisting of Helix Water District, Padre Dam
Municipal Water District, Santa Fe Irrigation District, and the
Sweetwater Authority) (hereafter collectively referred to as the
Applicants), a joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for a Natural Communities Conservation Program
Subregional Plan (SRP) and three Subarea Plans (SAPs). The combination
of the Joint Water Agency SRP and individual SAPs would serve as a
multiple species Habitat Conservation Plan under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Federal Endangered Species Act, as amended in 1982 (ESA).
The Service provides this notice to: (1) Describe the proposed
action and possible alternatives; (2) advise other Federal and State
agencies, affected Tribes, and the public of our intent to prepare an
EIS/EIR; (3) announce the initiation of a public scoping period; and
(4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues and
alternatives to be included in the EIS/EIR.
DATES: Public scoping meetings will be held on: Tuesday, February 8,
2005 from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. and Wednesday, February 9, 2005 from 4 p.m.
to 7 p.m. Written comments should be received on or before March 7,
2005.
ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be held at the following locations:
(1) Tuesday, February 8, 2005, at the Sweetwater Authority Reynolds
Desalination Facility, 3066 North Second Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91912;
and (2) Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at the Padre Dam Municipal Water
District Board Room, 10887 Woodside Avenue, Santee, CA 92072.
Information, written comments, or questions related to the
preparation of the EIS/EIR and NEPA process should be submitted to Erin
Fernandez, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Carlsbad, California 92009 (facsimile
760-431-5902).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Fernandez at (760) 431-9440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reasonable Accommodation
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should contact Erin Fernandez as soon
as possible (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In order to allow
sufficient time to process requests, please call no later than 1 week
before the public meeting. Information regarding this proposed action
is available in alternative formats upon request.
Background
Section 9 of the Federal ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and Federal
regulations prohibit the ``take'' of a fish or wildlife species listed
as endangered or threatened. Under the ESA, the following activities
are defined as take: harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture or collect listed animal species, or attempt to engage in
such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). However, under section 10(a) of the ESA,
we may issue permits to authorize ``incidental take'' of listed
species. ``Incidental take'' is defined by the ESA as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing permits for threatened species and
endangered species, respectively, are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 50 CFR 17.22.
Take of listed plant species is not prohibited under the ESA and
cannot be authorized under a section 10 permit. We propose to include
plant species on the permit in recognition of the conservation benefits
provided for them under the plan.
The purpose of the EIS/EIR is to analyze the impacts of the
proposed implementation of the SRP and three SAPs. The Federal need for
the SRP and three SAPs is to meet the criteria for incidental take
authorization of species on the covered species list.
The proposed SRP would comprehensively address how participating
water agencies will manage their lands to conserve natural habitats and
species while continuing to provide their mandated water services to
the public. The proposed SRP would serve as an ``umbrella document'' to
guide the preparation of Natural Communities Conservation Program
subarea plans by each participating water agency. The combination of
the
[[Page 6034]]
Joint Water Agency SRP and individual SAPs would serve as a multiple
species Habitat Conservation Plan under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Federal ESA.
The Service and the California Department of Fish and Game may
issue take authorization permits for individual SAPs with conditions or
modifications. The proposed SRP would consist of several key components
including an implementation process and structure, preserve management
guidelines, and a covered species list. A total of 80 species are
proposed for coverage under the SRP. The proposed SRP would strive to
anticipate and cover the effects on biological resources of all
currently foreseeable actions of the participating water agencies over
the next 75 years. The proposed SRP would address the following groups
of foreseeable projects and covered actions: facilities operation and
maintenance, planned or conceptual projects, and potential future
projects.
The proposed planning area encompasses approximately 8,600 acres
(13.5 square miles) of land in northern, eastern, and southern San
Diego County cumulatively owned by the participating water agencies.
These lands are located in the unincorporated County area, and in the
cities of Santee, El Cajon, La Mesa, and Chula Vista. In general,
ownerships consist of land used directly for water production,
collection, storage, treatment, and distribution as well as easements
used primarily for water and wastewater distribution pipelines. These
facilities consist of open water reservoirs, water tanks, water,
reclaimed water, and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations,
pipelines, and access roads. In addition, the agencies also have
maintenance trails and roadways, maintenance yards, and sedimentation
ponds. In some situations, watershed protection lands provide
recreational facilities, including camp grounds, golf courses, boat
docks and ramps, fishing piers, hiking trails, and interpretive
signage. These lands are operated in cooperation with other agencies
such as the County and City of San Diego.
Components of the proposed conservation program are now under
consideration by the Service and the Applicants. These components will
likely include avoidance and minimization measures, monitoring,
adaptive management, and mitigation measures consisting of
preservation, restoration, and enhancement of habitat.
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report
The Applicants, the Service, and the California Department of Fish
and Game have selected A.D. Hinshaw Associates to prepare the Draft
EIS/EIR. The joint document will be prepared in compliance with NEPA
and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Although A.D.
Hinshaw Associates will prepare the EIS/EIR, the Service will be
responsible for the scope and content of the document for NEPA
purposes, and the Sweetwater Authority will be responsible for the
scope and content of the EIR for CEQA purposes.
The EIS/EIR will consider the proposed action (i.e., the issuance
of a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit under the Federal ESA), and a
reasonable range of alternatives. A detailed description of the
proposed action and alternatives will be included in the EIS/EIR. It is
anticipated that several alternatives will be developed, which may vary
by the level of conservation, impacts caused by the proposed
activities, permit area, covered species, or a combination of these
factors. Additionally, a No Action alternative will be considered.
Under the No Action alternative, the Service would not issue a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit.
The EIS/EIR will also identify potentially significant impacts on
biological resources, recreation, and other environmental issues that
could occur directly or indirectly with implementation of the proposed
action and alternatives. For all potentially significant impacts, the
EIS/EIR will identify mitigation measures where feasible to reduce
these impacts to a level below significance.
Environmental review of the EIS/EIR will be conducted in accordance
with the requirements of NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its
implementing regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508), other applicable
regulations, and Service procedures for compliance with those
regulations. This notice is being furnished in accordance with 40 CFR
1501.7 of NEPA to obtain suggestions and information from other
agencies and the public on the scope of issues and alternatives to be
addressed in the EIS/EIR. The primary purpose of the scoping process is
to identify important issues raised by the public, related to the
proposed action. Written comments from interested parties are invited
to ensure that the full range of issues related to the proposed action
is identified. While written comments are encouraged, we will accept
both written and oral comments at the public meeting. In addition, you
may submit written comments by mail or facsimile transmission (see
ADDRESSES). All comments received, including names and addresses, will
become part of the official administrative record, and may be made
available to the public.
Dated: January 31, 2005.
Ken McDermond,
Deputy Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 05-2141 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
