Time Limit for Requests for De Novo, 4801 [05-1704]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules (10) Mark West Springs, California Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, edition of 1998, and (11) Jimtown, California Quadrangle— Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute Series, edition of 1993. (c) Boundaries. * * * * * * * * (8) Proceed southeast along the Bohemian Highway, crossing over the Camp Meeker map, to the town of Freestone, where the Highway intersects at BM 214 with an unnamed mediumduty road (known locally as Bodega Road, section 12, T6N, R10W, on the Valley Ford map). (9) Proceed 0.9 mile northeast on Bodega Road to its intersection, at BM 486, with Jonvive Road to the north and an unnamed light duty road to the south, (known locally as Barnett Valley Road, T6N, R9W, on the Camp Meeker map). (10) Proceed 2.2 miles south, followed by east, on Barnett Valley Road, crossing over the Valley Ford map, to its intersection with Burnside Road in section 17, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map. (11) Proceed 3.3 miles southeast on Burnside Road to its intersection with an unnamed medium duty road at BM 375, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map. (12) Proceed 0.6 mile straight southeast to an unnamed 610-foot elevation peak, 1.5 miles southwest of Canfield School, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map. (13) Proceed 0.75 mile straight eastsoutheast to an unnamed 641-foot elevation peak, 1.4 miles southsouthwest of Canfield School, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map. (14) Proceed 0.85 mile straight northeast to the intersection with an unnamed intermittent stream and Canfield Road; continue 0.3 mile straight in the same northeast line of direction to its intersection with the common boundary of Ranges 8 and 9, just west of an unnamed unimproved dirt road, T6N, on the Two Rock map. (15) Proceed 1.8 miles straight north along the common Range 8 and 9 boundary line to its intersection with Blucher Creek, T6N, on the Two Rock map. (16) Proceed 1.25 miles generally northeast along Blucher Creek to its intersection with Highway 116, also known as Gravenstein Highway, in section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map. (17) Proceed 0.2 mile straight southeast along Highway 116 to its intersection with an unnamed light duty road to the north in section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:55 Jan 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 (18) Proceed 0.1 mile straight northwest along the unnamed light duty road to its intersection with an unnamed medium-duty road to the east, (known as Todd Road in Section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map). (19) Proceed 4.8 miles east, north, and east again along Todd Road, a mediumduty road, crossing over the Sebastopol map and then passing over U.S. Highway 101 and continuing straight east 0.1 mile to Todd Road’s intersection with Santa Rosa Avenue, a primary road that is generally parallel to U.S. Highway 101, in section 2, T6N, R8W, on the Santa Rosa map. (20) Proceed 5.8 miles generally north along Santa Rosa Avenue, which becomes Mendocino Avenue, to its intersection with an unnamed secondary road, known locally as Bicentennial Way, 0.3 mile northnorthwest of BM 161 on Mendocino Avenue, section 11, T7N, R8W, on the Santa Rosa map. (21) Proceed 2.5 miles straight north, crossing over the 906-foot elevation peak in section 35 of the Santa Rosa map, to its intersection with Mark West Springs Road and the meandering 280foot elevation in section 26, T8N, R8W, of the Mark West Springs map. (22) Proceed 4.8 miles northnorthwest along Mark West Springs Road, which becomes Porter Creek Road, to its intersection with Franz Valley Road, a light-duty road to the north of Porter Creek Road, in section 12, T8N, R8W, on the Mark West Springs map. * * * * * Signed: January 24, 2005. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–1667 Filed 1–28–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–31–P level after filing a Notice of Disagreement. This document withdraws that proposed rule. DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of January 31, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Consultant, Policy and Regulations Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone (202) 273–7232. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, a claimant who disagrees with a decision by a Veterans Service Center may appeal that decision by filing a notice of disagreement (NOD). Under 38 CFR 3.2600, a claimant who has filed a timely NOD may also obtain de novo review of the decision of the Veterans Service Center by requesting such review with the NOD or within 60 days after the date that VA mails notice of the availability of de novo review. We proposed reducing that 60-day period to 15 days. However, we have determined that revision of the de novo review process is unnecessary at this time. Therefore, we are withdrawing the proposal. Approved: December 17, 2004. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. [FR Doc. 05–1704 Filed 1–28–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 36 RIN 2900–AK76 Loan Guaranty: Prepurchase Counseling Requirements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 3 RIN 2900–AK97 Time Limit for Requests for De Novo Review Department of Veterans Affairs. Withdrawal of proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In a document published in the Federal Register at 67 FR 10866 on March 11, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to amend its adjudication regulations concerning the time a claimant has in which to request a de novo review of a decision at the Veterans Service Center PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Department of Veterans Affairs. Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: ACTION: ACTION: 4801 Sfmt 4702 SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on October 11, 2001 (66 FR 51893) to amend its loan guaranty regulations that set forth underwriting standards for VA guaranteed loans. We had proposed to require first-time homebuyers to complete homeownership counseling and to add a compensating factor for certain veterans who do not fully meet VA’s underwriting standards. However, the proposed rule and comments have been superseded by recently-adopted requirements established by the Department of Defense mandating such counseling for all enlistees and by VA’s decision to provide a link to the Government National Mortgage E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM 31JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1704]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 3

RIN 2900-AK97


Time Limit for Requests for De Novo Review

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In a document published in the Federal Register at 67 FR 10866 
on March 11, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to 
amend its adjudication regulations concerning the time a claimant has 
in which to request a de novo review of a decision at the Veterans 
Service Center level after filing a Notice of Disagreement. This 
document withdraws that proposed rule.

DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of January 31, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Consultant, Policy 
and Regulations Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans 
Benefits Administration, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20420, 
telephone (202) 273-7232.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, a claimant who disagrees with a 
decision by a Veterans Service Center may appeal that decision by 
filing a notice of disagreement (NOD). Under 38 CFR 3.2600, a claimant 
who has filed a timely NOD may also obtain de novo review of the 
decision of the Veterans Service Center by requesting such review with 
the NOD or within 60 days after the date that VA mails notice of the 
availability of de novo review. We proposed reducing that 60-day period 
to 15 days. However, we have determined that revision of the de novo 
review process is unnecessary at this time. Therefore, we are 
withdrawing the proposal.

    Approved: December 17, 2004.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05-1704 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.