Proposed Expansion of the Russian River Valley Viticultural Area (2003R-144T), 4797-4801 [05-1667]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
4797
1. A wind generating plant must have
LVRT capability down to 15 percent of the
rated line voltage for 0.625 seconds;
2. A wind generating plant must be able to
operate continuously at 90 percent of the
rated line voltage, measured at the high
voltage side of the wind plant substation
transformer(s).
The wind generating plant may ask the
Transmission Provider for a variation of the
parameters of this regulation, and the
Transmission Provider may agree to such a
variation provided it does so on a comparable
and not unduly discriminatory basis among
wind generators. The Transmission Provider
may waive the low voltage ride-through
requirement on a comparable and not unduly
discriminatory basis for all wind plants.
ii. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) Capability
The Transmission Provider may agree to
waive or defer compliance with the reactive
power standard. However, any such waiver
or exemption must be considered a nonconforming agreement pursuant to section
11.3 of the LGIP.
We designate viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase. We invite comments on this
proposed amendment to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written
comments on or before April 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to
any of the following addresses:
• Chief, Regulations and Procedures
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 30, P.O.
Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044–
4412.
• 202–927–8525 (facsimile).
• nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
• https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/
index.htm. An online comment form is
posted with this notice on our Web site.
• https://www.regulations.gov (Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow instructions
for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice,
the petition, the appropriate maps, and
any comments we receive about this
proposal by appointment at the TTB
Library, 1310 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. To make an
appointment, call 202–927–2400. You
may also access copies of the notice and
comments online at https://www.ttb.gov/
alcohol/rules/index.htm.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
The wind plant shall provide SCADA
capability to transmit data and receive
instructions from the Transmission Provider.
The Transmission Provider and the wind
plant Interconnection Customer shall
determine what SCADA information is
essential for the proposed wind plant, taking
into account the size of the plant, its
characteristics, location, and importance in
maintaining generation resource adequacy
and transmission system reliability in its
area.
iii. Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive
Power)
A wind plant shall maintain a power factor
within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95
lagging, measured at the high voltage side of
the wind plant substation transformer(s). The
power factor range requirement can be met
by using, for example, power electronics
designed to supply this level of reactive
capability (taking into account any
limitations due to voltage level, real power
output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors
if agreed to by the Transmission Provider, or
a combination of the two. The
Interconnection Customer shall not disable
power factor equipment while the wind plant
is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able
to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support
in lieu of the power system stabilizer and
automatic voltage regulation at the generator
excitation system if the Interconnection
System Impact Study shows this to be
required for system reliability.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:55 Jan 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
[FR Doc. 05–1693 Filed 1–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Notice No. 30]
RIN 1513–AA67
Proposed Expansion of the Russian
River Valley Viticultural Area (2003R–
144T)
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau has received a
petition proposing the expansion of the
existing Russian River Valley
viticultural area in Sonoma County,
California. The proposed 30,200-acre
expansion would increase the size of
this viticultural area to 126,200 acres.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
EP31JA05.006</GPH>
(with the voltage at any given time never
falling below the minimum voltage indicated
by the solid line in Figure 1), the plant must
stay online. The Interconnection Customer
may not disable low voltage ride-through
equipment while the wind plant is in
operation.
Two key features of this proposed
regulation are:
4798
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
N. A. Sutton, Regulations and
Procedures Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 925
Lakeville St., No. 158, Petaluma, CA
94952; telephone 415–271–1254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol
beverage labels provide the consumer
with adequate information regarding a
product’s identity and prohibits the use
of misleading information on those
labels. The FAA Act also authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations to carry out its provisions.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these
regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the
list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region
distinguishable by geographical
features, the boundaries of which have
been recognized and defined in part 9
of the regulations. These designations
allow vintners and consumers to
attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to its
geographic origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of a viticultural
area is neither an approval nor an
endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations outlines the procedure for
proposing an American viticultural area
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area.
Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations
requires the petition to include—
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:55 Jan 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
• Evidence that the proposed
viticultural area is locally and/or
nationally known by the name specified
in the petition;
• Historical or current evidence that
supports setting the boundary of the
proposed viticultural area as the
petition specifies;
• Evidence relating to the
geographical features, such as climate,
elevation, physical features, and soils,
that distinguish the proposed
viticultural area from surrounding areas;
• A description of the specific
boundary of the proposed viticultural
area, based on features found on United
States Geological Survey (USGS) maps;
and
• A copy of the appropriate USGS
map(s) with the proposed viticultural
area’s boundary prominently marked.
Petitioners may use the same
procedure to request changes involving
existing viticultural areas.
Russian River Valley Expansion
Petition
General Background
TTB has received a petition from the
Russian River Valley Winegrowers, a
wine industry association based in
Fulton, California, proposing a 30,200acre expansion of the established
Russian River Valley viticultural area
(27 CFR 9.66). The established Russian
River Valley viticultural area is located
in Sonoma County, California, about 50
miles north of San Francisco. As it
currently exists, the Russian River
Valley viticultural area generally lies
north and west of Santa Rosa, north of
Sebastopol, east of the Bohemian
Highway (about 7 miles inland from the
Pacific coast), and south of Healdsburg.
The Chalk Hill viticultural area (27
CFR 9.52) lies entirely within the
existing Russian River Valley
viticultural area’s northeastern third,
while about 90 percent of the Sonoma
County Green Valley viticultural area
(27 CFR 9.57) is within the Russian
River Valley area’s southwestern third.
In turn, the Russian River Valley
viticultural area is entirely within the
Northern Sonoma viticultural area (27
CFR 9.70), and is largely within the
Sonoma Coast viticultural area (27 CFR
9.116). These two larger Sonoma County
areas are within the multi-county North
Coast viticultural area (27 CFR 9.30).
In the vicinity of the city of Santa
Rosa, the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers’ proposed expansion area
includes the mix of rural, suburban, and
urban land between Santa Rosa and
Mendocino Avenues in Santa Rosa and
the area’s present eastern boundary. To
the south, the proposed expansion
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would incorporate the remainder of the
Sonoma County Green Valley
viticultural area into the Russian River
Valley area, as well as a large rural
region to the west, south, and east of
Sebastopol.
As petitioned, the expansion
proposed by the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers includes a smaller, 767acre expansion approved by TTB in
2003. For details regarding this earlier
expansion, see T.D. TTB–7, published
in the Federal Register on December 2,
2003, at 68 FR 67367. T.D. TTB–7 is also
posted on the TTB Internet Web site at
https://www.tttb.gov.
Cooling coastal fog, which moves
inland from the Pacific Ocean via the
valleys of the Russian River and its
tributaries, is the dominant
distinguishing viticultural feature of the
existing Russian River Valley
viticultural area. The expansion petition
states that the reach of this coastal fog
is the most significant factor for
including the land in the proposed
expansion within the established area.
Other factors noted in the petition
include the expansion area’s location
within the Russian River Valley
watershed, and, to a lesser extent, the
expansion area’s geology and soils,
which are similar to what is found in
the existing viticultural area.
Below, we summarize the evidence
presented in the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers’ petition.
Name Evidence
The petition offers evidence that the
land in the proposed expansion area to
the east and south of the current
Russian River Valley viticultural area is
also referred to as the Russian River
Valley. A State of California hydrology
map shows that the Russian River
Valley, including the proposed
expansion area, is within the Russian
River Valley watershed.
The petition also included an article
from the July 2002 Wine Enthusiast
magazine (page 31) that defined the
Russian River Valley as ‘‘the box-shaped
region that extends from Healdsburg to
Santa Rosa in the east, and from
Occidental to Guerneville in the west.’’
This description includes the proposed
eastern boundary expansion. The 1996
‘‘Wine Country’’ guidebook (page 196),
also included in the petition, provides
a ‘‘Russian River Region’’ map that
includes the east and south sides of the
proposed expansion.
The Homes and Land real estate
magazine (Vol, 18, No. 7, summer of
2002) lists a ‘‘Russian River Appellation
Vineyard Estate’’ on pages 32 and 33.
The petition indicates that this estate is
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
within the eastern portion of the
proposed expansion area.
The Wine News June/July 2002
magazine publication includes an article
titled ‘‘Russian River Valley Pinot Noir’s
Promised Land’’ which discusses this
winegrowing area. On page 60 it notes
that the 24-acre Meredith Vineyard is
‘‘located at the southern end of the RRV
[Russian River Valley].’’ This vineyard
is in the proposed expansion area as
well, as noted on the United States
Geological Service Sebastopol
quadrangle map.
Boundary Evidence
The petition explains that,
historically, agriculture in the proposed
expansion area has included apples,
prunes, cherries, berries, grapes, and
other crops. As noted in the petition,
local resident Lee Bondi recalls that in
the early 1900s his family made wine
from Palomino grapes on their ranch in
the expansion area. Dena Bondelie, also
a resident living within the proposed
expansion area, remembers her father
talking about the Zinfandel wine made
by her grandfather at their Darby Lane
property.
Tom Henderson, an area resident,
recalls that during World War II his
grandparents grew berries, corn,
pumpkins, and acorn squash to
supplement their apple crop, on their
Sander Road property. Ms. Merry
Edwards, a current resident, states that
when she first moved to the area in
1977, it was heavily planted with
apples. Some apple and prune orchards
are being replaced with vineyards
because of the changing agricultural
markets, according to the Russian River
Valley Winegrowers group.
As of spring 2003, according to the
petition, there are approximately 1,070
acres planted with grapes within the
proposed expansion area, with another
200 acres under development for
commercial viticulture purposes.
Distinguishing Features
Treasury Decision ATF–159 of
October 21, 1983 (48 FR 48813),
established the Russian River Valley as
a viticultural area. This Treasury
Decision stated:
The Russian River viticultural area
includes those areas through which flow the
Russian River or some of its tributaries and
where there is a significant climate effect
from coastal fogs. The specific growing
climate is the principal distinctive
characteristic of the Russian River Valley
viticultural area. The area designated is a
cool growing coastal area because of fog
intruding up the Russian River and its
tributaries during the early morning hours.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:55 Jan 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
4799
Climate
Soils
The Russian River Valley viticultural
area expansion petition states that fog is
the single most unifying and significant
feature of the area. This is consistent
with statements in the original 1983
Russian River Valley viticultural area
petition. The proposed expansion area
also has heavy fog as documented by
Robert Sisson, Sonoma County
Viticulture Farm Advisor Emeritus, on
his 1976 map titled ‘‘Lines of Heaviest
and Average Maximum Fog Intrusion
for Sonoma County.’’
The current petition and Treasury
Decision ATF–159, which established
the Russian River Valley viticultural
area, both refer to the Winkler degreeday (or accumulated heat units) system,
which classifies grape-growing climatic
regions. (Each degree that a day’s mean
temperature is above 50 degrees F,
which is the minimum temperature
required for grapevine growth, is
counted as one degree day; see ‘‘General
Viticulture,’’ Albert J. Winkler,
University of California Press, 1975.) As
noted in Treasury Decision ATF–159,
‘‘The Russian River Valley viticultural
area is termed ‘coastal cool’ with a range
of 2000 to 2800 accumulated heat
units.’’
The petition provides growing season
temperature data from 2001 for four
vineyards within the proposed
expansion boundaries.
As indicated in the petition, there is
a similar range and diversity of soils in
the proposed expansion area and the
originally established Russian River
Valley viticultural area. This similarity
is documented on the Sonoma County
Soil Survey maps (USDA Conservation
Service, U.S. Forest Service, and
University of California Agricultural
Experiment Station, undated) on survey
sheets 65, 66, 73, 74, 80, 82, 88, 89, 96,
and 97.
The predominant soils within the
proposed Russian River Valley
viticultural area expansion the petition
notes, are Huichica Loam, Yolo Clay
Loam, and Yolo Silt Loam. These soils
are depicted on sheet 74 of the Sonoma
County Soil Survey. They are also found
within the established Russian River
Valley viticultural area in vineyards to
the north of the proposed expansion
area, as documented on pages 57 and 66
of the soil survey. The 1983 Treasury
Decision ATF–159 does not identify the
predominant soils of the area. Nor does
it indicate that the soils of the
viticultural area are unique.
Watershed
According to the petition, the large
Russian River watershed includes both
the established Russian River Valley
viticultural area and the proposed
expansion area. The Russian River
watershed, unit #18010110, is depicted
on the State of California Hydrology
Degree days
map, 1978. It extends from Lake
Vineyard
(accumulated
Mendocino south to Sonoma Mountain,
heat units)
and from Mt. St. Helena west to Jenner,
Le Carrefour .......................
2,636 where the river meets the coastline of
Osley East ..........................
2,567 the Pacific Ocean. The 1983 Treasury
Osley West .........................
2,084 Decision, ATF–159 states that the
Bloomfield ...........................
2,332 Russian River Valley viticultural area
‘‘includes those areas through which
The table above shows that the degree flow the Russian River or some of its
days for all four vineyards fall within
tributaries.’’
the 2,000 to 2,800 accumulated heat
Boundary Description
units range of Winkler’s ‘‘coastal cool’’
climate. This evidence suggests that
The 30,200-acre proposed expansion
these vineyards have the same grapeof the Russian River Valley viticultural
growing climate found within the
area includes land east and south of the
established Russian River Valley
area’s originally established boundary.
viticultural area.
The proposed expanded boundary
deviates from the established boundary
Elevation
at a point east of Highway 101 along
The terrain within the Russian River
Mark West Springs Road. From that
Valley viticultural area’s proposed
point, the proposed expanded boundary
expansion ranges in elevation from
line, in a clockwise direction, goes
about 70 feet to the east of Sebastopol,
south to Todd Road in Santa Rosa. It
to around 800 feet in the expansion
then meanders west, with a southward
area’s west toward Occidental, as noted
bulge south of Sebastopol that
on USGS maps. These elevations,
incorporates the crossroads hamlet of
according to USGS maps of this portion Knowles Corners. Passing north of the
of Sonoma County, are similar to those
town of Bloomfield, the proposed
found within most of the established
expanded boundary continues
Russian River Valley viticultural area.
northwest of Freestone, where it rejoins
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
4800
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the area’s established boundary. This
expansion would increase the Russian
River Valley viticultural area by about
31 percent, from 96,000 acres to 126,200
acres.
For a detailed description of the
Russian River Valley’s proposed
expanded boundary, see the narrative
boundary description the proposed
regulatory text published below in this
notice.
Maps
The petitioner(s) provided the
required maps to document the
proposed boundary, and we list them in
the proposed regulatory text.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
We invite comments from interested
members of the public on whether we
should expand the Russian River Valley
viticultural area as described above. We
are especially interested in comments
concerning the similarity of the
proposed expansion area to the
currently existing Russian River Valley
viticultural area. Please support your
comments with specific information
about the proposed expansion area’s
name, proposed boundaries, or
distinguishing features.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the
closing date shown above in this notice.
Your comments must include this
notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must
be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do
not acknowledge receipt of comments,
and we consider all comments as
originals. You may submit comments in
one of five ways:
• Mail: You may send written
comments to TTB at the address listed
in the ADDRESSES section.
• Facsimile: You may submit
comments by facsimile transmission to
202–927–8525. Faxed comments must—
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written
signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long.
This limitation assures electronic access
to our equipment. We will not accept
faxed comments that exceed five pages.
• E-mail: You may e-mail comments
to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments transmitted
by electronic mail must—
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on
the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by
11-inch paper.
• Online form: We provide a
comment form with the online copy of
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:55 Jan 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
this notice on our Web site at https://
www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ‘‘Send comments via e-mail’’
link under this notice number.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To
submit comments to us via the Federal
e-rulemaking portal, visit https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the
Administrator before the comment
closing date to ask for a public hearing.
The Administrator reserves the right to
determine, in light of all circumstances,
whether to hold a public hearing.
Therefore, it requires no regulatory
assessment.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the
public record and subject to disclosure.
Do not enclose any material in your
comments that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public
disclosure.
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice,
the petition, the appropriate maps, and
any comments we receive by
appointment at the TTB Library at 1310
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
You may also obtain copies at 20 cents
per 8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact our
librarian at the above address or
telephone 202–927–2400 to schedule an
appointment or to request copies of
comments.
For your convenience, we will post
this notice and any comments we
receive on this proposal on the TTB
Web site. We may omit voluminous
attachments or material that we
consider unsuitable for posting. In all
cases, the full comment will be available
in the TTB Library. To access the online
copy of this notice, visit https://
www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ‘‘View Comments’’ link under
this notice number to view the posted
comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed
regulation, if adopted, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed regulation imposes no
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of a viticultural
area name would be the result of a
proprietor’s efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Drafting Information
N.A. Sutton of the Regulations and
Procedures Division drafted this notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 27,
chapter 1, part 9, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—American Viticultural
Areas
2. Amend § 9.66 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (c)(8) through (c)(14),
redesignating paragraphs (c)(15) through
(c)(26) as (c)(23) through (c)(34), and
adding new paragraphs (c)(15) through
(c)(22) to read as follows:
§ 9.66
Russian River Valley.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate
maps for determining the boundary of
the Russian River Valley viticultural
area are 11 United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 Scale
topographic maps. They are titled:
(1) Healdsburg, California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1993;
(2) Guerneville, California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1993;
(3) Cazadero, California Quadrangle—
Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute Series, edition
of 1978;
(4) Duncans Mills California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1979;
(5) Camp Meeker, California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1995;
(6) Valley Ford, California
Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, edition
of 1954; photorevised 1971;
(7) Two Rock, California Quadrangle,
7.5 Minute Series, edition of 1954;
photorevised 1971;
(8) Sebastopol, California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1954; photorevised
1980;
(9) Santa Rosa, California
Quadrangle—Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1954; and
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 19 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(10) Mark West Springs, California
Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, edition
of 1998, and
(11) Jimtown, California Quadrangle—
Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute Series, edition
of 1993.
(c) Boundaries. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Proceed southeast along the
Bohemian Highway, crossing over the
Camp Meeker map, to the town of
Freestone, where the Highway intersects
at BM 214 with an unnamed mediumduty road (known locally as Bodega
Road, section 12, T6N, R10W, on the
Valley Ford map).
(9) Proceed 0.9 mile northeast on
Bodega Road to its intersection, at BM
486, with Jonvive Road to the north and
an unnamed light duty road to the
south, (known locally as Barnett Valley
Road, T6N, R9W, on the Camp Meeker
map).
(10) Proceed 2.2 miles south, followed
by east, on Barnett Valley Road, crossing
over the Valley Ford map, to its
intersection with Burnside Road in
section 17, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock
map.
(11) Proceed 3.3 miles southeast on
Burnside Road to its intersection with
an unnamed medium duty road at BM
375, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map.
(12) Proceed 0.6 mile straight
southeast to an unnamed 610-foot
elevation peak, 1.5 miles southwest of
Canfield School, T6N, R9W, on the Two
Rock map.
(13) Proceed 0.75 mile straight eastsoutheast to an unnamed 641-foot
elevation peak, 1.4 miles southsouthwest of Canfield School, T6N,
R9W, on the Two Rock map.
(14) Proceed 0.85 mile straight
northeast to the intersection with an
unnamed intermittent stream and
Canfield Road; continue 0.3 mile
straight in the same northeast line of
direction to its intersection with the
common boundary of Ranges 8 and 9,
just west of an unnamed unimproved
dirt road, T6N, on the Two Rock map.
(15) Proceed 1.8 miles straight north
along the common Range 8 and 9
boundary line to its intersection with
Blucher Creek, T6N, on the Two Rock
map.
(16) Proceed 1.25 miles generally
northeast along Blucher Creek to its
intersection with Highway 116, also
known as Gravenstein Highway, in
section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock
map.
(17) Proceed 0.2 mile straight
southeast along Highway 116 to its
intersection with an unnamed light duty
road to the north in section 18, T6N,
R8W, on the Two Rock map.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:55 Jan 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
(18) Proceed 0.1 mile straight
northwest along the unnamed light duty
road to its intersection with an
unnamed medium-duty road to the east,
(known as Todd Road in Section 18,
T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map).
(19) Proceed 4.8 miles east, north, and
east again along Todd Road, a mediumduty road, crossing over the Sebastopol
map and then passing over U.S.
Highway 101 and continuing straight
east 0.1 mile to Todd Road’s
intersection with Santa Rosa Avenue, a
primary road that is generally parallel to
U.S. Highway 101, in section 2, T6N,
R8W, on the Santa Rosa map.
(20) Proceed 5.8 miles generally north
along Santa Rosa Avenue, which
becomes Mendocino Avenue, to its
intersection with an unnamed
secondary road, known locally as
Bicentennial Way, 0.3 mile northnorthwest of BM 161 on Mendocino
Avenue, section 11, T7N, R8W, on the
Santa Rosa map.
(21) Proceed 2.5 miles straight north,
crossing over the 906-foot elevation
peak in section 35 of the Santa Rosa
map, to its intersection with Mark West
Springs Road and the meandering 280foot elevation in section 26, T8N, R8W,
of the Mark West Springs map.
(22) Proceed 4.8 miles northnorthwest along Mark West Springs
Road, which becomes Porter Creek
Road, to its intersection with Franz
Valley Road, a light-duty road to the
north of Porter Creek Road, in section
12, T8N, R8W, on the Mark West
Springs map.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: January 24, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–1667 Filed 1–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
level after filing a Notice of
Disagreement. This document
withdraws that proposed rule.
DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn
as of January 31, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Ferrandino, Consultant, Policy
and Regulations Staff, Compensation
and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone
(202) 273–7232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently,
a claimant who disagrees with a
decision by a Veterans Service Center
may appeal that decision by filing a
notice of disagreement (NOD). Under 38
CFR 3.2600, a claimant who has filed a
timely NOD may also obtain de novo
review of the decision of the Veterans
Service Center by requesting such
review with the NOD or within 60 days
after the date that VA mails notice of the
availability of de novo review. We
proposed reducing that 60-day period to
15 days. However, we have determined
that revision of the de novo review
process is unnecessary at this time.
Therefore, we are withdrawing the
proposal.
Approved: December 17, 2004.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05–1704 Filed 1–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 36
RIN 2900–AK76
Loan Guaranty: Prepurchase
Counseling Requirements
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AK97
Time Limit for Requests for De Novo
Review
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Withdrawal of proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In a document published in
the Federal Register at 67 FR 10866 on
March 11, 2002, the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to
amend its adjudication regulations
concerning the time a claimant has in
which to request a de novo review of a
decision at the Veterans Service Center
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
ACTION:
4801
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) published a proposed rule
in the Federal Register on October 11,
2001 (66 FR 51893) to amend its loan
guaranty regulations that set forth
underwriting standards for VA
guaranteed loans. We had proposed to
require first-time homebuyers to
complete homeownership counseling
and to add a compensating factor for
certain veterans who do not fully meet
VA’s underwriting standards. However,
the proposed rule and comments have
been superseded by recently-adopted
requirements established by the
Department of Defense mandating such
counseling for all enlistees and by VA’s
decision to provide a link to the
Government National Mortgage
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4797-4801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Notice No. 30]
RIN 1513-AA67
Proposed Expansion of the Russian River Valley Viticultural Area
(2003R-144T)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau has received a
petition proposing the expansion of the existing Russian River Valley
viticultural area in Sonoma County, California. The proposed 30,200-
acre expansion would increase the size of this viticultural area to
126,200 acres. We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may purchase. We invite comments on this
proposed amendment to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before April 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any of the following addresses:
Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 30, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
202-927-8525 (facsimile).
nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. An online
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site.
https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow instructions for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive about this proposal by appointment at
the TTB Library, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To make an
appointment, call 202-927-2400. You may also access copies of the
notice and comments online at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/
index.htm.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and
[[Page 4798]]
requirements for submitting comments, and for information on how to
request a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. A. Sutton, Regulations and
Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 925
Lakeville St., No. 158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 415-271-1254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA
Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels
provide the consumer with adequate information regarding a product's
identity and prohibits the use of misleading information on those
labels. The FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographic origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in
that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires
the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, elevation, physical features, and soils, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Petitioners may use the same procedure to request changes involving
existing viticultural areas.
Russian River Valley Expansion Petition
General Background
TTB has received a petition from the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers, a wine industry association based in Fulton, California,
proposing a 30,200-acre expansion of the established Russian River
Valley viticultural area (27 CFR 9.66). The established Russian River
Valley viticultural area is located in Sonoma County, California, about
50 miles north of San Francisco. As it currently exists, the Russian
River Valley viticultural area generally lies north and west of Santa
Rosa, north of Sebastopol, east of the Bohemian Highway (about 7 miles
inland from the Pacific coast), and south of Healdsburg.
The Chalk Hill viticultural area (27 CFR 9.52) lies entirely within
the existing Russian River Valley viticultural area's northeastern
third, while about 90 percent of the Sonoma County Green Valley
viticultural area (27 CFR 9.57) is within the Russian River Valley
area's southwestern third. In turn, the Russian River Valley
viticultural area is entirely within the Northern Sonoma viticultural
area (27 CFR 9.70), and is largely within the Sonoma Coast viticultural
area (27 CFR 9.116). These two larger Sonoma County areas are within
the multi-county North Coast viticultural area (27 CFR 9.30).
In the vicinity of the city of Santa Rosa, the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers' proposed expansion area includes the mix of rural,
suburban, and urban land between Santa Rosa and Mendocino Avenues in
Santa Rosa and the area's present eastern boundary. To the south, the
proposed expansion would incorporate the remainder of the Sonoma County
Green Valley viticultural area into the Russian River Valley area, as
well as a large rural region to the west, south, and east of
Sebastopol.
As petitioned, the expansion proposed by the Russian River Valley
Winegrowers includes a smaller, 767-acre expansion approved by TTB in
2003. For details regarding this earlier expansion, see T.D. TTB-7,
published in the Federal Register on December 2, 2003, at 68 FR 67367.
T.D. TTB-7 is also posted on the TTB Internet Web site at https://
www.tttb.gov.
Cooling coastal fog, which moves inland from the Pacific Ocean via
the valleys of the Russian River and its tributaries, is the dominant
distinguishing viticultural feature of the existing Russian River
Valley viticultural area. The expansion petition states that the reach
of this coastal fog is the most significant factor for including the
land in the proposed expansion within the established area. Other
factors noted in the petition include the expansion area's location
within the Russian River Valley watershed, and, to a lesser extent, the
expansion area's geology and soils, which are similar to what is found
in the existing viticultural area.
Below, we summarize the evidence presented in the Russian River
Valley Winegrowers' petition.
Name Evidence
The petition offers evidence that the land in the proposed
expansion area to the east and south of the current Russian River
Valley viticultural area is also referred to as the Russian River
Valley. A State of California hydrology map shows that the Russian
River Valley, including the proposed expansion area, is within the
Russian River Valley watershed.
The petition also included an article from the July 2002 Wine
Enthusiast magazine (page 31) that defined the Russian River Valley as
``the box-shaped region that extends from Healdsburg to Santa Rosa in
the east, and from Occidental to Guerneville in the west.'' This
description includes the proposed eastern boundary expansion. The 1996
``Wine Country'' guidebook (page 196), also included in the petition,
provides a ``Russian River Region'' map that includes the east and
south sides of the proposed expansion.
The Homes and Land real estate magazine (Vol, 18, No. 7, summer of
2002) lists a ``Russian River Appellation Vineyard Estate'' on pages 32
and 33. The petition indicates that this estate is
[[Page 4799]]
within the eastern portion of the proposed expansion area.
The Wine News June/July 2002 magazine publication includes an
article titled ``Russian River Valley Pinot Noir's Promised Land''
which discusses this winegrowing area. On page 60 it notes that the 24-
acre Meredith Vineyard is ``located at the southern end of the RRV
[Russian River Valley].'' This vineyard is in the proposed expansion
area as well, as noted on the United States Geological Service
Sebastopol quadrangle map.
Boundary Evidence
The petition explains that, historically, agriculture in the
proposed expansion area has included apples, prunes, cherries, berries,
grapes, and other crops. As noted in the petition, local resident Lee
Bondi recalls that in the early 1900s his family made wine from
Palomino grapes on their ranch in the expansion area. Dena Bondelie,
also a resident living within the proposed expansion area, remembers
her father talking about the Zinfandel wine made by her grandfather at
their Darby Lane property.
Tom Henderson, an area resident, recalls that during World War II
his grandparents grew berries, corn, pumpkins, and acorn squash to
supplement their apple crop, on their Sander Road property. Ms. Merry
Edwards, a current resident, states that when she first moved to the
area in 1977, it was heavily planted with apples. Some apple and prune
orchards are being replaced with vineyards because of the changing
agricultural markets, according to the Russian River Valley Winegrowers
group.
As of spring 2003, according to the petition, there are
approximately 1,070 acres planted with grapes within the proposed
expansion area, with another 200 acres under development for commercial
viticulture purposes.
Distinguishing Features
Treasury Decision ATF-159 of October 21, 1983 (48 FR 48813),
established the Russian River Valley as a viticultural area. This
Treasury Decision stated:
The Russian River viticultural area includes those areas through
which flow the Russian River or some of its tributaries and where
there is a significant climate effect from coastal fogs. The
specific growing climate is the principal distinctive characteristic
of the Russian River Valley viticultural area. The area designated
is a cool growing coastal area because of fog intruding up the
Russian River and its tributaries during the early morning hours.
Climate
The Russian River Valley viticultural area expansion petition
states that fog is the single most unifying and significant feature of
the area. This is consistent with statements in the original 1983
Russian River Valley viticultural area petition. The proposed expansion
area also has heavy fog as documented by Robert Sisson, Sonoma County
Viticulture Farm Advisor Emeritus, on his 1976 map titled ``Lines of
Heaviest and Average Maximum Fog Intrusion for Sonoma County.''
The current petition and Treasury Decision ATF-159, which
established the Russian River Valley viticultural area, both refer to
the Winkler degree-day (or accumulated heat units) system, which
classifies grape-growing climatic regions. (Each degree that a day's
mean temperature is above 50 degrees F, which is the minimum
temperature required for grapevine growth, is counted as one degree
day; see ``General Viticulture,'' Albert J. Winkler, University of
California Press, 1975.) As noted in Treasury Decision ATF-159, ``The
Russian River Valley viticultural area is termed `coastal cool' with a
range of 2000 to 2800 accumulated heat units.''
The petition provides growing season temperature data from 2001 for
four vineyards within the proposed expansion boundaries.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Degree days
Vineyard (accumulated
heat units)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le Carrefour........................................... 2,636
Osley East............................................. 2,567
Osley West............................................. 2,084
Bloomfield............................................. 2,332
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The table above shows that the degree days for all four vineyards
fall within the 2,000 to 2,800 accumulated heat units range of
Winkler's ``coastal cool'' climate. This evidence suggests that these
vineyards have the same grape-growing climate found within the
established Russian River Valley viticultural area.
Elevation
The terrain within the Russian River Valley viticultural area's
proposed expansion ranges in elevation from about 70 feet to the east
of Sebastopol, to around 800 feet in the expansion area's west toward
Occidental, as noted on USGS maps. These elevations, according to USGS
maps of this portion of Sonoma County, are similar to those found
within most of the established Russian River Valley viticultural area.
Soils
As indicated in the petition, there is a similar range and
diversity of soils in the proposed expansion area and the originally
established Russian River Valley viticultural area. This similarity is
documented on the Sonoma County Soil Survey maps (USDA Conservation
Service, U.S. Forest Service, and University of California Agricultural
Experiment Station, undated) on survey sheets 65, 66, 73, 74, 80, 82,
88, 89, 96, and 97.
The predominant soils within the proposed Russian River Valley
viticultural area expansion the petition notes, are Huichica Loam, Yolo
Clay Loam, and Yolo Silt Loam. These soils are depicted on sheet 74 of
the Sonoma County Soil Survey. They are also found within the
established Russian River Valley viticultural area in vineyards to the
north of the proposed expansion area, as documented on pages 57 and 66
of the soil survey. The 1983 Treasury Decision ATF-159 does not
identify the predominant soils of the area. Nor does it indicate that
the soils of the viticultural area are unique.
Watershed
According to the petition, the large Russian River watershed
includes both the established Russian River Valley viticultural area
and the proposed expansion area. The Russian River watershed, unit
18010110, is depicted on the State of California Hydrology
map, 1978. It extends from Lake Mendocino south to Sonoma Mountain, and
from Mt. St. Helena west to Jenner, where the river meets the coastline
of the Pacific Ocean. The 1983 Treasury Decision, ATF-159 states that
the Russian River Valley viticultural area ``includes those areas
through which flow the Russian River or some of its tributaries.''
Boundary Description
The 30,200-acre proposed expansion of the Russian River Valley
viticultural area includes land east and south of the area's originally
established boundary. The proposed expanded boundary deviates from the
established boundary at a point east of Highway 101 along Mark West
Springs Road. From that point, the proposed expanded boundary line, in
a clockwise direction, goes south to Todd Road in Santa Rosa. It then
meanders west, with a southward bulge south of Sebastopol that
incorporates the crossroads hamlet of Knowles Corners. Passing north of
the town of Bloomfield, the proposed expanded boundary continues
northwest of Freestone, where it rejoins
[[Page 4800]]
the area's established boundary. This expansion would increase the
Russian River Valley viticultural area by about 31 percent, from 96,000
acres to 126,200 acres.
For a detailed description of the Russian River Valley's proposed
expanded boundary, see the narrative boundary description the proposed
regulatory text published below in this notice.
Maps
The petitioner(s) provided the required maps to document the
proposed boundary, and we list them in the proposed regulatory text.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
We invite comments from interested members of the public on whether
we should expand the Russian River Valley viticultural area as
described above. We are especially interested in comments concerning
the similarity of the proposed expansion area to the currently existing
Russian River Valley viticultural area. Please support your comments
with specific information about the proposed expansion area's name,
proposed boundaries, or distinguishing features.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
notice. Your comments must include this notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do not acknowledge receipt of
comments, and we consider all comments as originals. You may submit
comments in one of five ways:
Mail: You may send written comments to TTB at the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to 202-927-8525. Faxed comments must--
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long. This limitation assures
electronic access to our equipment. We will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
E-mail: You may e-mail comments to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments
transmitted by electronic mail must--
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by 11-inch paper.
Online form: We provide a comment form with the online
copy of this notice on our Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/
rules/index.htm. Select the ``Send comments via e-mail'' link under
this notice number.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To submit comments to us via
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether to hold a public
hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the public record and subject to
disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you
consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive by appointment at the TTB Library at
1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. You may also obtain copies at
20 cents per 8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact our librarian at the above
address or telephone 202-927-2400 to schedule an appointment or to
request copies of comments.
For your convenience, we will post this notice and any comments we
receive on this proposal on the TTB Web site. We may omit voluminous
attachments or material that we consider unsuitable for posting. In all
cases, the full comment will be available in the TTB Library. To access
the online copy of this notice, visit https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/
index.htm. Select the ``View Comments'' link under this notice number
to view the posted comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived
from the use of a viticultural area name would be the result of a
proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Therefore, it requires
no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
N.A. Sutton of the Regulations and Procedures Division drafted this
notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we propose to amend
title 27, chapter 1, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--American Viticultural Areas
2. Amend Sec. 9.66 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c)(8) through
(c)(14), redesignating paragraphs (c)(15) through (c)(26) as (c)(23)
through (c)(34), and adding new paragraphs (c)(15) through (c)(22) to
read as follows:
Sec. 9.66 Russian River Valley.
* * * * *
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundary of the Russian River Valley viticultural area are 11 United
States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 Scale topographic maps. They
are titled:
(1) Healdsburg, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1993;
(2) Guerneville, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1993;
(3) Cazadero, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute Series,
edition of 1978;
(4) Duncans Mills California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1979;
(5) Camp Meeker, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1995;
(6) Valley Ford, California Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, edition
of 1954; photorevised 1971;
(7) Two Rock, California Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, edition of
1954; photorevised 1971;
(8) Sebastopol, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1954; photorevised 1980;
(9) Santa Rosa, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute
Series, edition of 1954; and
[[Page 4801]]
(10) Mark West Springs, California Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series,
edition of 1998, and
(11) Jimtown, California Quadrangle--Sonoma Co., 7.5 Minute Series,
edition of 1993.
(c) Boundaries. * * *
* * * * *
(8) Proceed southeast along the Bohemian Highway, crossing over the
Camp Meeker map, to the town of Freestone, where the Highway intersects
at BM 214 with an unnamed medium-duty road (known locally as Bodega
Road, section 12, T6N, R10W, on the Valley Ford map).
(9) Proceed 0.9 mile northeast on Bodega Road to its intersection,
at BM 486, with Jonvive Road to the north and an unnamed light duty
road to the south, (known locally as Barnett Valley Road, T6N, R9W, on
the Camp Meeker map).
(10) Proceed 2.2 miles south, followed by east, on Barnett Valley
Road, crossing over the Valley Ford map, to its intersection with
Burnside Road in section 17, T6N, R9W, on the Two Rock map.
(11) Proceed 3.3 miles southeast on Burnside Road to its
intersection with an unnamed medium duty road at BM 375, T6N, R9W, on
the Two Rock map.
(12) Proceed 0.6 mile straight southeast to an unnamed 610-foot
elevation peak, 1.5 miles southwest of Canfield School, T6N, R9W, on
the Two Rock map.
(13) Proceed 0.75 mile straight east-southeast to an unnamed 641-
foot elevation peak, 1.4 miles south-southwest of Canfield School, T6N,
R9W, on the Two Rock map.
(14) Proceed 0.85 mile straight northeast to the intersection with
an unnamed intermittent stream and Canfield Road; continue 0.3 mile
straight in the same northeast line of direction to its intersection
with the common boundary of Ranges 8 and 9, just west of an unnamed
unimproved dirt road, T6N, on the Two Rock map.
(15) Proceed 1.8 miles straight north along the common Range 8 and
9 boundary line to its intersection with Blucher Creek, T6N, on the Two
Rock map.
(16) Proceed 1.25 miles generally northeast along Blucher Creek to
its intersection with Highway 116, also known as Gravenstein Highway,
in section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map.
(17) Proceed 0.2 mile straight southeast along Highway 116 to its
intersection with an unnamed light duty road to the north in section
18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock map.
(18) Proceed 0.1 mile straight northwest along the unnamed light
duty road to its intersection with an unnamed medium-duty road to the
east, ( known as Todd Road in Section 18, T6N, R8W, on the Two Rock
map).
(19) Proceed 4.8 miles east, north, and east again along Todd Road,
a medium-duty road, crossing over the Sebastopol map and then passing
over U.S. Highway 101 and continuing straight east 0.1 mile to Todd
Road's intersection with Santa Rosa Avenue, a primary road that is
generally parallel to U.S. Highway 101, in section 2, T6N, R8W, on the
Santa Rosa map.
(20) Proceed 5.8 miles generally north along Santa Rosa Avenue,
which becomes Mendocino Avenue, to its intersection with an unnamed
secondary road, known locally as Bicentennial Way, 0.3 mile north-
northwest of BM 161 on Mendocino Avenue, section 11, T7N, R8W, on the
Santa Rosa map.
(21) Proceed 2.5 miles straight north, crossing over the 906-foot
elevation peak in section 35 of the Santa Rosa map, to its intersection
with Mark West Springs Road and the meandering 280-foot elevation in
section 26, T8N, R8W, of the Mark West Springs map.
(22) Proceed 4.8 miles north-northwest along Mark West Springs
Road, which becomes Porter Creek Road, to its intersection with Franz
Valley Road, a light-duty road to the north of Porter Creek Road, in
section 12, T8N, R8W, on the Mark West Springs map.
* * * * *
Signed: January 24, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-1667 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
