Program To Permit Cost-Sharing of Air Traffic Modernization Projects Guidance 2005, 4186-4190 [05-1565]
Download as PDF
4186
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
Kahanetzadak.com, also known as Kahane
Tzadak, also known as the Hatikva Jewish
Identity Center, also known as the Rabbi Meir
David Kahane Memorial Fund, also known as
Friends of the Jewish Idea Yeshiva, also
known as Judean Congress, also known as
Jewish Legion, also known as The Voice of
Judea, also known as No’ar Meir, also known
as Meir’s Youth, also known as American
Friends of Yeshivat Rav Meir, also known as
American Friends of the United Yeshiva
Movement, also known as The Committee
Against Racism and Discrimination (CARD).
In consultation with the Attorney
General and the Secretary of the
Treasury, the Secretary of State hereby
amends the designation made under the
authority of section 1(a)(ii)(A) of
Executive Order 12947 of January 23,
1995, (as amended by Executive Order
13099 of August 20, 1998) to revoke
Kahane.net as an alias of Kahane Chai
(also known as Kach, Kahane.org, and
the other aliases listed above) based on
a finding that circumstances have
changed in such a manner as to warrant
revocation. This revocation is made by
amending the referenced designation
and is effective on the date of
publication of this notice. In all other
respects, the designation under the
authority of section 1(a)(ii)(A) of
Executive Order 12947 (as amended by
Executive Order 13099) of Kahane Chai
(also known as Kach, Kahane.org, and
the other aliases listed above) is
maintained.
Dated: January 25, 2005.
William P. Pope,
Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05–1608 Filed 1–27–05; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Dated: January 25, 2005.
William P. Pope,
Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05–1609 Filed 1–27–05; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
Federal Aviation Administration
Foreign Terrorists and Terrorist
Organizations; Designation
Amendment of a certain designation in
order to revoke Kahane.net as an alias of
Kahane Chai, also known as Kach, also
known as Kahane Lives, also known as the
Kfar Tapuah Fund, also known as The Judean
Voice, also known as The Judean Legion, also
known as The Way of the Torah, also known
as The Yeshiva of the Jewish Idea, also
known as the Repression of Traitors, also
known as Dikuy Bogdim, also known as
DOV, also known as the State of Judea, also
known as the Committee for the Safety of the
Roads, also known as the Sword of David,
also known as Judea Police, also known as
Forefront of the Idea, also known as The
Qomemiyut Movement, also known as
KOACH, also known as New Kach
Movement, also known as newkach.org, also
known as Kahane, also known as Yeshivat
HaRav Meir, also known as the International
15:43 Jan 27, 2005
In consultation with the Attorney
General, the Secretary of the Treasury,
and the Secretary of Homeland Security,
the Secretary of State hereby revokes the
designation made under the authority of
section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of
September 23, 2001, of Kahane.net as an
alias of Kahane Chai (also known as
Kach, Kahane.org, and the other aliases
listed above) based on a finding that
circumstances have changed in such a
manner as to warrant revocation. This
revocation is made by amending the
referenced designation and is effective
on the date of publication of this notice.
In all other respects, the designation
under the authority of section 1(b) of
Executive Order 13224 of September 23,
2001, of Kahane Chai (also known as
Kach, Kahane.org, and the other aliases
listed above) is maintained.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Public Notice 4980]
VerDate jul<14>2003
Kahane Movement, also known as
Kahane.org, also known as
Kahanetzadak.com, also known as Kahane
Tzadak, also known as the Hatikva Jewish
Identity Center, also known as the Rabbi Meir
David Kahane Memorial Fund, also known as
Friends of the Jewish Idea Yeshiva, also
known as Judean Congress, also known as
Jewish Legion, also known as The Voice of
Judea, also known as No’ar Meir, also known
as Meir’s Youth, also known as American
Friends of Yeshivat Rav Meir, also known as
American Friends of the United Yeshiva
Movement, also known as The Committee
Against Racism and Discrimination (CARD).
Jkt 205001
Termination of Review of Noise
Compatibility Program, Jackson
International Airport, Jackson, MS
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces it has
terminated its review of the noise
compatibility program, at the request of
the Jackson Municipal Airport
Authority, under the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 47501 et seq., and 14 CFR Part
150.
The effective date of the
FAA’s determination of its review of the
Jackson International Airport noise
compatibility program is January 20,
2005.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristi Ashley, 100 West Cross St., Suite
B, Jackson, MS 39208, (601) 664–9891.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 21, 2004, the FAA
determined that the noise exposure
maps submitted by the Jackson
Municipal Airport authority were in
compliance with applicable
requirements, and began its review of
the noise compatibility program. On
January 14, 2005, the Jackson Municipal
Airport Authority requested that the
FAA suspend its review and processing
of the noise compatibility program for
immediate project closure.
Questions may be directed to the
individual named above under the
heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Issued in FAA Southern Region, Jackson
ADO, January 20, 2005.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 05–1564 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Program To Permit Cost-Sharing of Air
Traffic Modernization Projects
Guidance 2005
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Program guidance for air traffic
modernization cost-share program.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is authorized to
approve up to 10 air traffic
modernization cost share projects per
year under Vision 100—Century of
Aviation Reauthorization Act, (Vision
100), Public Law 108–176, Section 183.
The initial cost-share program was
conducted under the authorization of
Public Law 106–181, Section 304 of the
Wendell H. Ford Aviation and
Investment Reform Act for the 21st
Century (AIR–21). Under the Vision
100, section 183 the FAA is now issuing
program guidance based upon the
lessons learned from the pilot program
implementation. This guidance is to
inform potential sponsors of the cost
share program, the process to apply for
the program and the criteria for
approval for cost-sharing projects for
this fiscal year. The purpose of Vision
100, Section 183 is to improve aviation
safety and enhance mobility of the
Nation’s air transportation system by
encouraging non-Federal investment in
air traffic control facilities and
equipment. Under this program, the
Secretary of Transportation may make
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
grants to eligible project sponsors. Each
eligible project is limited to Federal
funding as highlighted in section 2.3.1
with the Federal cost share not to
exceed 33 percent of the project’s
facilities and equipment (excluding
operations and maintenance) cost. A
project sponsor means any major user of
the National Airspace System as
determined by the Secretary, including
a public-use airport or a joint venture
between a public-use airport and one or
more U.S. air carriers.
DATES: The FAA’s Vice President for
Finance may receive initial sponsors’
expressions of interest at any time in
fiscal year 2005. While the agency has
no proposal submission deadline,
potential sponsors are encouraged to
submit proposals as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Sponsors’ expressions of
interest/proposal should be mailed or
delivered, in duplicate, to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Director of
Capital Expenditures Programs, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Electronic
submissions will be accepted, but must
be followed up with a signed paper
copy within five working days, to the
address listed above. The electronic
submissions should be mailed to
Chris.Witt@faa.gov. Deliveries may be
made between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Witt of the Finance Capital
Expenditure Directorate Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
267–7646.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background
In performing its mission of providing
a safe and efficient air transportation
system, the FAA operates and maintains
a complex air traffic control system
infrastructure. Vision 100, Section 183
authorizes a program to permit costsharing of air traffic modernization
projects, under which major users of the
national aerospace system, which
includes a public use airport or airport/
airline joint ventures, may procure and
install facilities and equipment in
cooperation with the FAA. The program
is intended to allow project sponsors to
achieve accelerated deployment of
eligible facilities or equipment, and to
help expand aviation infrastructure.
The FAA is authorized to approve up
to 10 projects per year under Vision 100,
Section 183. Those sponsors whose
projects were approved in the AIR 21
pilot program may submit additional
proposals under the new authorization.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 Jan 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
All sponsors who anticipate submitting
a request should review the criteria in
sections 2.1 and 2.2 before submission.
2. Program Guidance
This section provides the statutory
language sponsor eligibility of Vision
100 section 183 and outlines FAA’s
supplementary criteria for the cost share
program. The sponsor eligibility, project
eligibility, and evaluation and screening
criteria are outlined in Sections 2.1, 2.2
and 2.6 respectively of this guidance.
2.1
Eligible Project Sponsors
2.1.1 Statutory Provisions of Vision
100 for Sponsor Eligibility
A project sponsor means any major
user of the National Airspace System as
determined by the Secretary, including
a public-use airport or a joint venture
between a public-use airport and one or
more U.S. air carriers.
2.1.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for
Sponsor Eligibility
An eligible project sponsor is any
major user of the national airspace
system including public-use airport (or
group of airports), either publicly or
privately owned, acting on its own or in
a joint venture with one or more U.S. air
carriers. All landing facilities meeting
these criteria are eligible, including but
not limited to commercial service
airports, reliever airports, general
aviation airports, and heliports.
Eligibility is not limited to airports;
other National Airspace System (NAS)
major users such as state or regional
aviation activities may be eligible.
All eligible sponsors are encouraged
to participate. If selected for the
program, the sponsor must be willing to
enter into a Memorandum of Agreement
with the FAA outlining the specific
goals to be accomplished, the roles and
responsibilities of each party, schedule
milestones, and funding contributions
of the parties. An eligible sponsor must
have an available source of funds to
execute the program.
2.2
Eligible Projects
2.2.1 Statutory Provisions for Project
Eligibility
The term ‘eligible project’ means a
project to purchase equipment or
software relating to the Nation’s air
traffic control system that is certified or
approved by the Administrator of the
Federal Aviation Administration and
that promotes safety, efficiency, or
mobility. Such projects may include:
a. Airport-specific air traffic facilities
and equipment, including local area
augmentation systems,* instrument
landings systems, weather and wind
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4187
shear detection equipment, and lighting
improvements;
b. Automation tools to effect
improvements in airport capacity,
including passive final approach
spacing tools and traffic management
advisory equipment; and
c. Equipment and software that
enhance airspace control procedures or
assist in en route surveillance, including
oceanic and offshore flight tracking.
* Note these projects will be eligible,
assuming availability and viability of the
equipment within the time limitation
highlighted in 2.2.2.c.
2.2.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for
Project Eligibility
a. Projects should align with the
FAA’s strategic Flight Plan goals.
b. The project should be consistent
with FAA’s air traffic equipment/
systems infrastructure and architecture
and should be a validated project of a
FAA program. The project, when
commissioned, should provide
measurable benefits that benefit
national, regional, or local objectives/
interests and the FAA NAS.
c. The project shall be initiated within
one year of project approval and
completed/commissioned within five
years of project approval (allowing for
an environmental impact study (if
necessary), acquisition, supply support,
training programs, etc.).
d. Equipment and facilities should
meet applicable FAA advisory circulars
and specifications.
e. The project should serve the
general welfare of the flying public; it
should not be used for the exclusive
interest of a for-profit entity.
f. Any facility/equipment acquired
under the project should be a new asset,
not an asset that the sponsor has already
acquired or is committed to acquiring.
g. The project should have a useful
and expected life of ten years or more,
notwithstanding the possible need to
replace project components during its
operating life.
h. The cost-share program is not the
correct forum for requesting
development of RNAV procedures.
i. A sponsor may submit a multiple
component project proposal (as outlined
in paragraph 2.5) where each
component forms part or all of an
integrated system. The FAA reserves the
option to accept one or multiple
components of a proposal.
j. A project may not be co-mingled
with other FAA cost-sharing programs.
k. All equipment and facilities should
meet appropriate OSHA standards for
employee safety and fire protection.
Where land is involved, the property
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4188
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
should meet all environmental
compliance requirements, including
noise, hazardous material, property
access, and zoning rights.
2.3
2.3.1
Funding
Statutory Provisions for Funding
The Federal share of the cost of an
eligible project carried out under the
program shall not exceed 33 percent. No
project may receive more than
$5,000,000 in Federal funding. The
sponsor’s share of the cost of an eligible
project shall be provided from nonFederal sources, including revenues
collected pursuant to Title 49, United
States Code 40117.
2.3.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for
Funding
FAA is not obligated to fund one-third
of the total project costs; rather, FAA’s
share may not exceed this threshold.
The project sponsor must provide twothirds or more of the total project cost.
The Federal and non-Federal shares of
project cost may take the form of in-kind
contributions. Equipment in FAA’s
inventory that has not been previously
deployed qualifies as eligible
equipment. If selected for the program,
a sponsor may use passenger facility
charge (PFC) revenues to acquire and
install eligible facilities and equipment,
but not to fund their operation or
maintenance. Normal PFC processing
procedures under Federal Aviation
Regulation 14 CFR part 158 will be used
to approve the imposition of a PFC or
the use of PFC revenue as the nonFederal share of a program project.
Federal contributions applied to any
other Federal project or grant may not
be used to satisfy the sponsor’s cost
share under this program.
The following criteria apply to the
calculation of the cost-sharing ratio:
a. Project costs are limited to those
costs that the FAA would normally
incur in conventional facilities and
equipment funding (e.g., if land/right-ofway must be acquired or leased for a
project, its cost can be included in the
cost-sharing ratio only if FAA would
otherwise incur it in conventional
program funding).
b. Operations and maintenance costs
of the project, both before and after any
sponsor-elected project transfer to the
FAA, will not be considered as part of
the cost-share contribution. However,
these costs must be identified.
c. Non-Federal funding may include
cash, substantial equipment
contributions that are wholly utilized as
an integral part of the project, and
personnel services dedicated to the
proposed project prior to
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 Jan 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
commissioning, as long as such
personnel are not otherwise supported
with Federal funds. The non-Federal
cost may include in-kind contributions
(e.g., buildings). In-kind contributions
will be evaluated as to whether they
present a cost that FAA would
otherwise incur in conventional
facilities and equipment funding.
d. Aside from in-kind contributions,
only funds expended by the sponsor
after the project approval date will be
eligible for inclusion in the cost-sharing
ratio.
e. Unless otherwise specified by these
criteria, the principles and standards for
determining costs should be conducted
in accordance with OMB Circular A–87,
Cost Principles for State, Local, and
Indian Tribal Governments.
f. As with other U.S. DOT cost-sharing
grants, it is inappropriate for a
management/administrative fee to be
included as part of the sponsor’s
contribution. This does not prohibit
appropriate fee payments to vendors or
others that may provide goods or
services to support the project.
FAA funding decisions will be based
on the project evaluation and project
selection processes discussed later in
this notice.
The U.S. Department of
Transportation and the Comptroller
General of the United States have the
right to obtain and assess all documents
pertaining to the use of Federal and
non-Federal contributions for selected
projects. Sponsors should maintain
sufficient documentation during
negotiations and during the life of the
project to substantiate costs.
2.4 Transfer of Facility or Equipment
to FAA
2.4.1 Statutory Provisions for Facility
or Equipment Transfer
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, and upon agreement by the
Administrator, a project sponsor may
transfer, without consideration, to the
FAA, facilities, equipment, and
automation tools, the purchase of which
was assisted by a grant made under this
section if such facilities, equipment or
tools meet Federal Aviation
Administration operation and
maintenance criteria.
2.4.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for
Facility or Equipment Transfer
Project transfers to the FAA will be at
the sponsor’s election and in accordance
with the criteria listed below.
a. At the time of transfer, the project
should be operable and maintainable by
the FAA and should comply with FAA
Order 6700.20, Non-Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Navigational Aids and Air Traffic
Control Facilities, or any successor
Order then in effect.
b. In the event of transfer, software
code, data rights, and support tools
should be provided to the FAA at no
cost to the FAA.
If the project is not transferred to the
FAA, the sponsor remains liable for all
operations and maintenance costs,
including the costs of capital
sustainment.
2.5 Application Procedures
Unlike the cost share pilot program,
for this fiscal year all applications will
be reviewed upon receipt and selected
based upon individual merit and
alignment with the FAA’s goals and
objectives as outlined in the strategic
planning documents. The statutory limit
is ten projects per fiscal year. The
following application procedures will
be used when applying for cost-share:
a. The purpose of the application is
provide sufficient information to
conduct detained analysis that evaluates
cost, benefits, risk, alignment with
strategic direction of the proposed
project and to compare the proposal
with other NAS needs. It is suggested
that the sponsor contact the FAA’s cost
share office to discuss the potential
project before the applicant expends
excessive resources on the project
application.
b. Eligible sponsors may submit
multiple projects and projects with
multiple components, but each piece of
equipment/activity must be identified
and costed separately, with
appropriately defined benefits and
should be listed in priority order. An
example of a multiple component
project would be an instrument landing
system (ILS) project that may include in
addition to the ILS equipment, middle
markers and runway lighting for a
complete package. The FAA reserves the
option to accept one or multiple pieces
of each proposal.
c. Projects that would be good
candidates for this program may include
equipment and systems that monitor
weather, support runway incursion
reduction, and support regional interest.
d. Under this program, either the FAA
or the sponsor may acquire and/or
install facilities or equipment. In the
case where the FAA manages the
procurement, existing FAA contracts
will be used where possible.
e. Proposals for new air traffic control
towers will only be considered if they
enhance the National Airspace System.
Per FAA Order 6030.1, FAA Policy on
Relocation, movement of an existing air
traffic control tower for the
convenience/benefit of only the airport
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4189
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
will not be considered. Requests for
towers will be considered utilizing the
criteria in Order 7031.2C, Airway
Planning Standards Number One (APS–
1).
2.5.2. Formal Application and
Selection of Projects
The proposal should not be more than
thirty pages in length. During the
evaluation process each sponsor should
submit an application with the
following elements needed by the FAA
to evaluate the merits of the application.
a. Project Description: The project
description should contain: (1) The
identity of the submitting sponsor
(including point-of-contact’s name,
mailing address, telephone number, fax
number, and e-mail address) and all
participating authorities or entities in
the case of joint ventures; (2) project
name and location; and (3) a detailed
project description. In addition, the
sponsor must provide a statement of
intent to transfer the project to the FAA,
including anticipated transfer date, or
intent not to transfer the project to the
FAA.
b. Projected Benefits: All applications
should describe the need for the project
and demonstrate it’s measurable
contributions to safety, efficiency,
capacity, productivity and as applicable,
at the airport, regional, and system-wide
levels. The sponsor may conduct its
own analysis, or where the FAA has the
equipment/system on an acquisition
waterfall the sponsor may opt to
summarize existing FAA cost benefit
analysis, and/or may use the investment
criteria in FAA Order 7031.2C, Airway
Planning Standard Number One.
c. Economic Analysis: Supporting the
projected benefits review the applicant
should conduct an economic analysis.
The analysis should include a schedule
of project costs, including: (1) Up-front
costs broken down into proposed shares
between the sponsor and the FAA; and
(2) annual and life-cycle operations and
maintenance costs before and after
transfer to the FAA (if the sponsor elects
to transfer). The level of effort devoted
to the analyses should be tailored to the
scope and cost of the project. For
complex programs FAA guidance can be
found in Report FAA–APO–98–4,
Economic Analysis of Investment and
Regulatory Programs—Revised Guide,
and Report FAA–APO–98–8, Economic
Values for Evaluation of Federal
Aviation Administration Investment
and Regulatory Programs.
d. Schedule: The Schedule should list
all significant proposed project dates,
including the start date, completion
date, date of project transfer to the FAA
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 Jan 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
(if applicable), and key interim
milestone dates.
e. Financial Plan: The Financial Plan
should contain: (1) The proposed local
and Federal cost shares, (2) evidence of
the sponsor’s ability to provide funds
for its cost share (e.g., approved local
appropriation or Memorandum of
Agreement); and (3) any commitment
the sponsor might choose to offer for the
assumption and liability of cost
overruns aside from the liability
criterion provided earlier in this notice.
f. Letter of Commitment: Sponsors
should demonstrate a commitment to
the project, as evidenced by a Letter of
Commitment signed by all project
participants (including any participating
air carriers). The letter should, at a
minimum, include a list of the
participating agencies and organizations
in the proposed project; the roles,
responsibilities and relationship of each
participant; and the name, address, and
telephone number of the individual
representing the sponsor.
g. Letter of Acknowledgement/
Support: The application will include a
letter of acknowledgment/support from
the applicable State Department of
Transportation and/or other appropriate
jurisdiction (to avoid circumventing
State and metropolitan planning
processes). It is the intent of FAA
Headquarters for the appropriate
projects to include the FAA’s Regional
Office in the project review cycle. It
would be in the best interest of the
applicant to pre-coordinate the projects
with the appropriate FAA Regional
Office.
The FAA will review and evaluate the
application using a panel of technical
program experts and senior managers
based on the criteria outlined below in
Section 2.6. Following its evaluations,
the review panel will recommend to the
FAA’s Air Traffic Operations Senior
Vice President for Finance and the
appropriate Vice President under whose
area of responsibility the system will be
installed, if the application in their view
should be accepted. If the FAA selects
a project for inclusion in the cost share
program, an agreement will be executed
between the sponsor and the FAA.
2.6 Application Evaluation and
Screening Criteria
The FAA will review each of the
applications based upon the individual
merit of the application. The FAA will
consider the following elements in
evaluating an application:
a. Compliance with statutory criteria,
FAA’s supplemental criteria, and
application procedures.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
b. Degree to which the project
provides benefits that contributes to the
FAA’s documented goals and objectives.
c. Qualitative and quantifiable
benefits to the airport, region, and
national airspace system.
d. Likelihood of project success in
terms of cost, schedule and performance
and achieving proposed benefits/
outcomes.
e. Evidence that the project can be
implemented in accordance with the
proposed schedule.
f. Ability of sponsor to provide its cost
share.
g. Availability of FAA resources.
h. Degree of Federal leveraging
(degree to which the proposal
minimizes the ratio of Federal costs to
total project costs).
i. Cost to the FAA: post-transfer lifecycle operating and maintenance costs.
2.7 Schedule Summary
Applications may be submitted at any
time during the fiscal year. The time
required for reviewing and approving/
disapproving the typical application is
outlined below.
Milestone
Applications
Applications due to
FAA.
FAA Responses to
Sponsor’s Application requesting additional information
(may not be necessary).
FAA Announcement
of Decision.
Time frame
Anytime.
One month after receipt of application.
Three months after
receipt of application.
2.8 Project Implementation
Information
During the life of the project, the FAA
may collect data from the sponsor and
conduct (with non-project funds)
independent evaluations of the project’s
impact on safety, efficiency, and
mobility objectives. This will allow the
FAA to ascertain the success of the
program.
3. Impact of Revised Guidelines
Under the Vision 100—Section 183,
the guidelines shall not be subject to
administrative rulemaking requirements
under subchapter II of chapter 5 of title
5.
4. References
The following list outlines references
cited above:
OMB Circular A–87, Cost Principles for
State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments,
revised August 29, 1997.
Report FAA–APO–98–4, Economic
Analysis of Investment and Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4190
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 18 / Friday, January 28, 2005 / Notices
Programs—Revised Guide. Available upon
request from FAA’s Office of Aviation Policy
and Plans, telephone (202) 267–3308. It may
also be found on the Internet at: https://
api.hq.faa.gov/apo_pubs.htm.
Report FAA–APO–98–8, Economic Values
for Evaluation of Federal Aviation
Administration Investment and Regulatory
Programs. Available upon request from the
FAA’s Office of Aviation Policy and Plans,
telephone (202) 267–3308. It may also be
found on the Internet at: https://
api.hq.faa.gov/apo_pubs.htm.
FAA Order 6030.1, FAA Policy on
Relocation. Available upon request from the
FAA telephone (202) 646–2310.
FAA Order 7031.2C, Airway Planning
Standard Number One, through Change 12.
Available upon request from the FAA’s
Office of Aviation Policy and Plans,
Telephone (202) 267–3308.
FAA Order 6700.20, Non-Federal
Navigational Aids and Air Traffic Control
Facilities. Available upon request from the
FAA’s NAS Operations Program Office,
telephone (202) 267–3034.
Issued in Washington, DC on January 24,
2005.
J. Robbins Tucker, Jr.,
Director of Finance Capital Expenditures.
[FR Doc. 05–1565 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 Jan 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer
Advocacy Panel (Including the States
of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan,
Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area
4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be
conducted (via teleconference). The
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting
public comment, ideas, and suggestions
on improving customer service at the
Internal Revenue Service.
DATES: The meeting will be held
Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 11 a.m.,
eastern time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Ann Delzer at 1–888–912–1227, or
(414) 297–1604.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given pursuant to Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988)
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer
Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday,
February 22, 2005, at 11 a.m., eastern
time via a telephone conference call.
You can submit written comments to
the panel by faxing to (414) 297–1623,
or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel,
Stop 1006MIL, 310 West Wisconsin
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203–2221 or
you can contact us at https://
www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not
required to be open to the public, but
because we are always interested in
community input, we will accept public
comments. Please contact Mary Ann
Delzer at 1–888–912–1227 or (414) 297–
1604 for dial-in information.
The agenda will include the
following: Various IRS issues.
Dated: January 21, 2005.
Bernard Coston,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 05–1554 Filed 1–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 18 (Friday, January 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4186-4190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1565]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Program To Permit Cost-Sharing of Air Traffic Modernization
Projects Guidance 2005
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Program guidance for air traffic modernization cost-share
program.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is authorized to approve up to 10 air traffic
modernization cost share projects per year under Vision 100--Century of
Aviation Reauthorization Act, (Vision 100), Public Law 108-176, Section
183. The initial cost-share program was conducted under the
authorization of Public Law 106-181, Section 304 of the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation and Investment Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21). Under
the Vision 100, section 183 the FAA is now issuing program guidance
based upon the lessons learned from the pilot program implementation.
This guidance is to inform potential sponsors of the cost share
program, the process to apply for the program and the criteria for
approval for cost-sharing projects for this fiscal year. The purpose of
Vision 100, Section 183 is to improve aviation safety and enhance
mobility of the Nation's air transportation system by encouraging non-
Federal investment in air traffic control facilities and equipment.
Under this program, the Secretary of Transportation may make
[[Page 4187]]
grants to eligible project sponsors. Each eligible project is limited
to Federal funding as highlighted in section 2.3.1 with the Federal
cost share not to exceed 33 percent of the project's facilities and
equipment (excluding operations and maintenance) cost. A project
sponsor means any major user of the National Airspace System as
determined by the Secretary, including a public-use airport or a joint
venture between a public-use airport and one or more U.S. air carriers.
DATES: The FAA's Vice President for Finance may receive initial
sponsors' expressions of interest at any time in fiscal year 2005.
While the agency has no proposal submission deadline, potential
sponsors are encouraged to submit proposals as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Sponsors' expressions of interest/proposal should be mailed
or delivered, in duplicate, to the Federal Aviation Administration,
Director of Capital Expenditures Programs, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20590. Electronic submissions will be accepted, but
must be followed up with a signed paper copy within five working days,
to the address listed above. The electronic submissions should be
mailed to Chris.Witt@faa.gov. Deliveries may be made between 8:30 a.m.
and 5 p.m. weekdays, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Witt of the Finance Capital
Expenditure Directorate Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 267-
7646.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background
In performing its mission of providing a safe and efficient air
transportation system, the FAA operates and maintains a complex air
traffic control system infrastructure. Vision 100, Section 183
authorizes a program to permit cost-sharing of air traffic
modernization projects, under which major users of the national
aerospace system, which includes a public use airport or airport/
airline joint ventures, may procure and install facilities and
equipment in cooperation with the FAA. The program is intended to allow
project sponsors to achieve accelerated deployment of eligible
facilities or equipment, and to help expand aviation infrastructure.
The FAA is authorized to approve up to 10 projects per year under
Vision 100, Section 183. Those sponsors whose projects were approved in
the AIR 21 pilot program may submit additional proposals under the new
authorization. All sponsors who anticipate submitting a request should
review the criteria in sections 2.1 and 2.2 before submission.
2. Program Guidance
This section provides the statutory language sponsor eligibility of
Vision 100 section 183 and outlines FAA's supplementary criteria for
the cost share program. The sponsor eligibility, project eligibility,
and evaluation and screening criteria are outlined in Sections 2.1, 2.2
and 2.6 respectively of this guidance.
2.1 Eligible Project Sponsors
2.1.1 Statutory Provisions of Vision 100 for Sponsor Eligibility
A project sponsor means any major user of the National Airspace
System as determined by the Secretary, including a public-use airport
or a joint venture between a public-use airport and one or more U.S.
air carriers.
2.1.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for Sponsor Eligibility
An eligible project sponsor is any major user of the national
airspace system including public-use airport (or group of airports),
either publicly or privately owned, acting on its own or in a joint
venture with one or more U.S. air carriers. All landing facilities
meeting these criteria are eligible, including but not limited to
commercial service airports, reliever airports, general aviation
airports, and heliports. Eligibility is not limited to airports; other
National Airspace System (NAS) major users such as state or regional
aviation activities may be eligible.
All eligible sponsors are encouraged to participate. If selected
for the program, the sponsor must be willing to enter into a Memorandum
of Agreement with the FAA outlining the specific goals to be
accomplished, the roles and responsibilities of each party, schedule
milestones, and funding contributions of the parties. An eligible
sponsor must have an available source of funds to execute the program.
2.2 Eligible Projects
2.2.1 Statutory Provisions for Project Eligibility
The term `eligible project' means a project to purchase equipment
or software relating to the Nation's air traffic control system that is
certified or approved by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration and that promotes safety, efficiency, or mobility. Such
projects may include:
a. Airport-specific air traffic facilities and equipment, including
local area augmentation systems,* instrument landings systems, weather
and wind shear detection equipment, and lighting improvements;
b. Automation tools to effect improvements in airport capacity,
including passive final approach spacing tools and traffic management
advisory equipment; and
c. Equipment and software that enhance airspace control procedures
or assist in en route surveillance, including oceanic and offshore
flight tracking.
* Note these projects will be eligible, assuming availability
and viability of the equipment within the time limitation
highlighted in 2.2.2.c.
2.2.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for Project Eligibility
a. Projects should align with the FAA's strategic Flight Plan
goals.
b. The project should be consistent with FAA's air traffic
equipment/systems infrastructure and architecture and should be a
validated project of a FAA program. The project, when commissioned,
should provide measurable benefits that benefit national, regional, or
local objectives/interests and the FAA NAS.
c. The project shall be initiated within one year of project
approval and completed/commissioned within five years of project
approval (allowing for an environmental impact study (if necessary),
acquisition, supply support, training programs, etc.).
d. Equipment and facilities should meet applicable FAA advisory
circulars and specifications.
e. The project should serve the general welfare of the flying
public; it should not be used for the exclusive interest of a for-
profit entity.
f. Any facility/equipment acquired under the project should be a
new asset, not an asset that the sponsor has already acquired or is
committed to acquiring.
g. The project should have a useful and expected life of ten years
or more, notwithstanding the possible need to replace project
components during its operating life.
h. The cost-share program is not the correct forum for requesting
development of RNAV procedures.
i. A sponsor may submit a multiple component project proposal (as
outlined in paragraph 2.5) where each component forms part or all of an
integrated system. The FAA reserves the option to accept one or
multiple components of a proposal.
j. A project may not be co-mingled with other FAA cost-sharing
programs.
k. All equipment and facilities should meet appropriate OSHA
standards for employee safety and fire protection. Where land is
involved, the property
[[Page 4188]]
should meet all environmental compliance requirements, including noise,
hazardous material, property access, and zoning rights.
2.3 Funding
2.3.1 Statutory Provisions for Funding
The Federal share of the cost of an eligible project carried out
under the program shall not exceed 33 percent. No project may receive
more than $5,000,000 in Federal funding. The sponsor's share of the
cost of an eligible project shall be provided from non-Federal sources,
including revenues collected pursuant to Title 49, United States Code
40117.
2.3.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for Funding
FAA is not obligated to fund one-third of the total project costs;
rather, FAA's share may not exceed this threshold. The project sponsor
must provide two-thirds or more of the total project cost. The Federal
and non-Federal shares of project cost may take the form of in-kind
contributions. Equipment in FAA's inventory that has not been
previously deployed qualifies as eligible equipment. If selected for
the program, a sponsor may use passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues
to acquire and install eligible facilities and equipment, but not to
fund their operation or maintenance. Normal PFC processing procedures
under Federal Aviation Regulation 14 CFR part 158 will be used to
approve the imposition of a PFC or the use of PFC revenue as the non-
Federal share of a program project.
Federal contributions applied to any other Federal project or grant
may not be used to satisfy the sponsor's cost share under this program.
The following criteria apply to the calculation of the cost-sharing
ratio:
a. Project costs are limited to those costs that the FAA would
normally incur in conventional facilities and equipment funding (e.g.,
if land/right-of-way must be acquired or leased for a project, its cost
can be included in the cost-sharing ratio only if FAA would otherwise
incur it in conventional program funding).
b. Operations and maintenance costs of the project, both before and
after any sponsor-elected project transfer to the FAA, will not be
considered as part of the cost-share contribution. However, these costs
must be identified.
c. Non-Federal funding may include cash, substantial equipment
contributions that are wholly utilized as an integral part of the
project, and personnel services dedicated to the proposed project prior
to commissioning, as long as such personnel are not otherwise supported
with Federal funds. The non-Federal cost may include in-kind
contributions (e.g., buildings). In-kind contributions will be
evaluated as to whether they present a cost that FAA would otherwise
incur in conventional facilities and equipment funding.
d. Aside from in-kind contributions, only funds expended by the
sponsor after the project approval date will be eligible for inclusion
in the cost-sharing ratio.
e. Unless otherwise specified by these criteria, the principles and
standards for determining costs should be conducted in accordance with
OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal
Governments.
f. As with other U.S. DOT cost-sharing grants, it is inappropriate
for a management/administrative fee to be included as part of the
sponsor's contribution. This does not prohibit appropriate fee payments
to vendors or others that may provide goods or services to support the
project.
FAA funding decisions will be based on the project evaluation and
project selection processes discussed later in this notice.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Comptroller General
of the United States have the right to obtain and assess all documents
pertaining to the use of Federal and non-Federal contributions for
selected projects. Sponsors should maintain sufficient documentation
during negotiations and during the life of the project to substantiate
costs.
2.4 Transfer of Facility or Equipment to FAA
2.4.1 Statutory Provisions for Facility or Equipment Transfer
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and upon agreement by
the Administrator, a project sponsor may transfer, without
consideration, to the FAA, facilities, equipment, and automation tools,
the purchase of which was assisted by a grant made under this section
if such facilities, equipment or tools meet Federal Aviation
Administration operation and maintenance criteria.
2.4.2 Supplementary FAA Criteria for Facility or Equipment Transfer
Project transfers to the FAA will be at the sponsor's election and
in accordance with the criteria listed below.
a. At the time of transfer, the project should be operable and
maintainable by the FAA and should comply with FAA Order 6700.20, Non-
Federal Navigational Aids and Air Traffic Control Facilities, or any
successor Order then in effect.
b. In the event of transfer, software code, data rights, and
support tools should be provided to the FAA at no cost to the FAA.
If the project is not transferred to the FAA, the sponsor remains
liable for all operations and maintenance costs, including the costs of
capital sustainment.
2.5 Application Procedures
Unlike the cost share pilot program, for this fiscal year all
applications will be reviewed upon receipt and selected based upon
individual merit and alignment with the FAA's goals and objectives as
outlined in the strategic planning documents. The statutory limit is
ten projects per fiscal year. The following application procedures will
be used when applying for cost-share:
a. The purpose of the application is provide sufficient information
to conduct detained analysis that evaluates cost, benefits, risk,
alignment with strategic direction of the proposed project and to
compare the proposal with other NAS needs. It is suggested that the
sponsor contact the FAA's cost share office to discuss the potential
project before the applicant expends excessive resources on the project
application.
b. Eligible sponsors may submit multiple projects and projects with
multiple components, but each piece of equipment/activity must be
identified and costed separately, with appropriately defined benefits
and should be listed in priority order. An example of a multiple
component project would be an instrument landing system (ILS) project
that may include in addition to the ILS equipment, middle markers and
runway lighting for a complete package. The FAA reserves the option to
accept one or multiple pieces of each proposal.
c. Projects that would be good candidates for this program may
include equipment and systems that monitor weather, support runway
incursion reduction, and support regional interest.
d. Under this program, either the FAA or the sponsor may acquire
and/or install facilities or equipment. In the case where the FAA
manages the procurement, existing FAA contracts will be used where
possible.
e. Proposals for new air traffic control towers will only be
considered if they enhance the National Airspace System. Per FAA Order
6030.1, FAA Policy on Relocation, movement of an existing air traffic
control tower for the convenience/benefit of only the airport
[[Page 4189]]
will not be considered. Requests for towers will be considered
utilizing the criteria in Order 7031.2C, Airway Planning Standards
Number One (APS-1).
2.5.2. Formal Application and Selection of Projects
The proposal should not be more than thirty pages in length. During
the evaluation process each sponsor should submit an application with
the following elements needed by the FAA to evaluate the merits of the
application.
a. Project Description: The project description should contain: (1)
The identity of the submitting sponsor (including point-of-contact's
name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail
address) and all participating authorities or entities in the case of
joint ventures; (2) project name and location; and (3) a detailed
project description. In addition, the sponsor must provide a statement
of intent to transfer the project to the FAA, including anticipated
transfer date, or intent not to transfer the project to the FAA.
b. Projected Benefits: All applications should describe the need
for the project and demonstrate it's measurable contributions to
safety, efficiency, capacity, productivity and as applicable, at the
airport, regional, and system-wide levels. The sponsor may conduct its
own analysis, or where the FAA has the equipment/system on an
acquisition waterfall the sponsor may opt to summarize existing FAA
cost benefit analysis, and/or may use the investment criteria in FAA
Order 7031.2C, Airway Planning Standard Number One.
c. Economic Analysis: Supporting the projected benefits review the
applicant should conduct an economic analysis. The analysis should
include a schedule of project costs, including: (1) Up-front costs
broken down into proposed shares between the sponsor and the FAA; and
(2) annual and life-cycle operations and maintenance costs before and
after transfer to the FAA (if the sponsor elects to transfer). The
level of effort devoted to the analyses should be tailored to the scope
and cost of the project. For complex programs FAA guidance can be found
in Report FAA-APO-98-4, Economic Analysis of Investment and Regulatory
Programs--Revised Guide, and Report FAA-APO-98-8, Economic Values for
Evaluation of Federal Aviation Administration Investment and Regulatory
Programs.
d. Schedule: The Schedule should list all significant proposed
project dates, including the start date, completion date, date of
project transfer to the FAA (if applicable), and key interim milestone
dates.
e. Financial Plan: The Financial Plan should contain: (1) The
proposed local and Federal cost shares, (2) evidence of the sponsor's
ability to provide funds for its cost share (e.g., approved local
appropriation or Memorandum of Agreement); and (3) any commitment the
sponsor might choose to offer for the assumption and liability of cost
overruns aside from the liability criterion provided earlier in this
notice.
f. Letter of Commitment: Sponsors should demonstrate a commitment
to the project, as evidenced by a Letter of Commitment signed by all
project participants (including any participating air carriers). The
letter should, at a minimum, include a list of the participating
agencies and organizations in the proposed project; the roles,
responsibilities and relationship of each participant; and the name,
address, and telephone number of the individual representing the
sponsor.
g. Letter of Acknowledgement/Support: The application will include
a letter of acknowledgment/support from the applicable State Department
of Transportation and/or other appropriate jurisdiction (to avoid
circumventing State and metropolitan planning processes). It is the
intent of FAA Headquarters for the appropriate projects to include the
FAA's Regional Office in the project review cycle. It would be in the
best interest of the applicant to pre-coordinate the projects with the
appropriate FAA Regional Office.
The FAA will review and evaluate the application using a panel of
technical program experts and senior managers based on the criteria
outlined below in Section 2.6. Following its evaluations, the review
panel will recommend to the FAA's Air Traffic Operations Senior Vice
President for Finance and the appropriate Vice President under whose
area of responsibility the system will be installed, if the application
in their view should be accepted. If the FAA selects a project for
inclusion in the cost share program, an agreement will be executed
between the sponsor and the FAA.
2.6 Application Evaluation and Screening Criteria
The FAA will review each of the applications based upon the
individual merit of the application. The FAA will consider the
following elements in evaluating an application:
a. Compliance with statutory criteria, FAA's supplemental criteria,
and application procedures.
b. Degree to which the project provides benefits that contributes
to the FAA's documented goals and objectives.
c. Qualitative and quantifiable benefits to the airport, region,
and national airspace system.
d. Likelihood of project success in terms of cost, schedule and
performance and achieving proposed benefits/outcomes.
e. Evidence that the project can be implemented in accordance with
the proposed schedule.
f. Ability of sponsor to provide its cost share.
g. Availability of FAA resources.
h. Degree of Federal leveraging (degree to which the proposal
minimizes the ratio of Federal costs to total project costs).
i. Cost to the FAA: post-transfer life-cycle operating and
maintenance costs.
2.7 Schedule Summary
Applications may be submitted at any time during the fiscal year.
The time required for reviewing and approving/disapproving the typical
application is outlined below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Milestone Time frame
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applications
Applications due to FAA................... Anytime.
FAA Responses to Sponsor's Application One month after receipt of
requesting additional information (may application.
not be necessary).
FAA Announcement of Decision.............. Three months after receipt
of application.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.8 Project Implementation Information
During the life of the project, the FAA may collect data from the
sponsor and conduct (with non-project funds) independent evaluations of
the project's impact on safety, efficiency, and mobility objectives.
This will allow the FAA to ascertain the success of the program.
3. Impact of Revised Guidelines
Under the Vision 100--Section 183, the guidelines shall not be
subject to administrative rulemaking requirements under subchapter II
of chapter 5 of title 5.
4. References
The following list outlines references cited above:
OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments, revised August 29, 1997.
Report FAA-APO-98-4, Economic Analysis of Investment and
Regulatory
[[Page 4190]]
Programs--Revised Guide. Available upon request from FAA's Office of
Aviation Policy and Plans, telephone (202) 267-3308. It may also be
found on the Internet at: https://api.hq.faa.gov/apo_pubs.htm.
Report FAA-APO-98-8, Economic Values for Evaluation of Federal
Aviation Administration Investment and Regulatory Programs.
Available upon request from the FAA's Office of Aviation Policy and
Plans, telephone (202) 267-3308. It may also be found on the
Internet at: https://api.hq.faa.gov/apo_pubs.htm.
FAA Order 6030.1, FAA Policy on Relocation. Available upon
request from the FAA telephone (202) 646-2310.
FAA Order 7031.2C, Airway Planning Standard Number One, through
Change 12. Available upon request from the FAA's Office of Aviation
Policy and Plans, Telephone (202) 267-3308.
FAA Order 6700.20, Non-Federal Navigational Aids and Air Traffic
Control Facilities. Available upon request from the FAA's NAS
Operations Program Office, telephone (202) 267-3034.
Issued in Washington, DC on January 24, 2005.
J. Robbins Tucker, Jr.,
Director of Finance Capital Expenditures.
[FR Doc. 05-1565 Filed 1-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M