Petitions for Aliens To Perform Temporary Nonagricultural Services or Labor (H-2B), 3984-3993 [05-1240]
Download as PDF
3984
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 214
[DHS No. 2004–0033]
RIN 1615–AA82
Petitions for Aliens To Perform
Temporary Nonagricultural Services or
Labor (H–2B)
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: An H–2B alien is someone
who comes temporarily to the United
States to perform temporary
nonagricultural labor or services. The
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), after consulting with the
Department of Labor (DOL) and the
Department of State (DOS), is proposing
significant changes to its regulations
that are designed to increase the
effectiveness of the H–2B nonimmigrant
classification. This proposed rule will
facilitate use of the H–2B program by
United States employers who are unable
to find United States workers to perform
the temporary labor or services for
which the H–2B nonimmigrant is
sought. Through this proposed rule,
DHS has created a one-step application
process whereby certain U.S. employers
seeking H–2B temporary workers now
will only be required to file one
application—the Form I–129, Petition
for Nonimmigrant Worker, which will
include a modified H supplement
containing certain labor attestations.
With limited exceptions, U.S. employers
will no longer need to file for or receive
a labor certification from the
Department of Labor. In addition, DHS
is reducing significantly the paper-based
application process by now requiring
that most Form I–129 petitions
(including the H supplement) be
submitted to USCIS electronically,
through e-filing. DHS anticipates that
this one-step process and the e-filing
will enhance the effectiveness of the H–
2B program, reduce costs and delays
associated with separate USCIS petition
adjudication and DOL labor certification
processes, and will match a U.S.
employer with a qualified H–2B worker
in a more timely fashion. Finally, this
proposed rule makes changes that will
maintain the integrity of the program
through enforcement mechanisms while
retaining the current definition of the
word ‘‘temporary’’ in 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(ii) in order to ensure
continued availability of the program to
its traditional users. These proposals
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
will increase the efficiency of the
program by eliminating certain
regulatory barriers, and improve
Government coordination.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 28,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 1615–AA82 or DHS
Docket DHS–2004–0033 by one of the
following methods:
• EPA Federal Partner EDOCKET
Web site: https://www.epa.gov/
feddocket. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the Web site.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When
submitting comments electronically,
please include RIN 1615–AA82 or DHS–
2004–0033 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail/Hand-delivered/Courier:
Director, Regulatory Management
Division, Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the DHS–2004–0033 or
RIN 1615–AA82. All comments received
will be posted without change to
https://www.epa.gov/feddocket,
including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
https://www.epa.gov/feddocket. You may
also access the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitted comments may also be
inspected at Regulatory Management
Division, Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling (202) 514–3291.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin J. Cummings, Adjudications
Officer, Office of Program and
Regulation Development, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529, telephone (202)
353–8177.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. DHS also invites
comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism affects that
might result from this proposed rule.
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to DHS in developing these
procedures will reference a specific
portion of the proposed rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority that support such
recommended change. See ADDRESSES
above for information on how to submit
comments.
What Is an H–2B Nonimmigrant?
Section 101(a)(15)(h)(ii)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (Act)
describes an H–2B alien as an alien
coming temporarily to the United States
to perform temporary nonagricultural
labor or services. This definition is
reflected at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(1)(ii)(D) and
(h)(6)(i).
Why Is DHS Proposing To Issue This
Regulation?
The H–2B program has existed
without substantial modification since
1952. In 1990, Congress attached a
limitation on the number of H–2B
workers but otherwise the program has
not changed to accommodate
employers’ needs or to offer worker
protections. After consulting with DOL
and DOS and reviewing the definitions
and procedures currently used to
regulate the H–2B program, DHS has
determined that the H–2B process
should be modified to reduce
unnecessary burdens that hinder
petitioning employers’ ability to
effectively use this visa category. The
current rules require employers to
obtain temporary labor certification
from the Secretary of Labor before
obtaining permission to engage an H–2B
worker. The delays in processing
applications for labor certification
combined with the relatively short
period of time for which the worker will
be available under current rules have
discouraged use of the program. This
rule will remove existing regulatory
barriers and thus likely lead to more
efficiency in the H–2B program.
What Is the Current Petitioning Process
for an H–2B Nonimmigrant?
Section 214(c) of the Act provides that
the Secretary of Homeland Security,
after consultation with appropriate
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
entities of the Government and upon
petition of the importing employer, will
determine whether an alien may be
imported as a H–2B nonimmigrant
temporary worker. 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(1).
Historically, the consultation
requirement has been accomplished by
receiving a labor certification from DOL;
however, the nature of the consultation
is not defined in the statute.
The current regulation at 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6) provides that a petitioner
seeking to employ an H–2B
nonimmigrant must establish that the
alien will not displace United States
workers who are capable of performing
such services or labor and that the
employment of the alien will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of United States workers. An
employer may not file a petition for an
H–2B temporary worker unless that
employer has obtained a labor
certification from the Secretary of Labor.
To obtain a labor certification, a
prospective employer must test the
labor market and, in addition, pay the
alien a salary that will not adversely
affect the United States labor market. A
petitioner must demonstrate that the
need for the temporary services or labor
is a one-time occurrence, a seasonal
need, a peakload need, or an
intermittent need. In general, the period
of the petitioner’s need must be less
than one year. Extensions beyond the
one-year period of time can be approved
in extraordinary circumstances. In
determining whether a petitioner’s need
is temporary, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) examines
the nature of the petitioner’s need, not
the nature of the beneficiary’s proposed
duties.
What Changes Is DHS Proposing in This
Rule?
To better accommodate the needs of
United States employers that utilize the
H–2B program, DHS is proposing a
number of significant changes to the H–
2B classification.
First, DHS is proposing to amend 8
CFR 214.2(h)(2) to require most
employers seeking an H–2B temporary
worker to submit an attestation that
meets the requirements of DOL
regulations. Currently, an employer
seeking a temporary worker is required
to file the Form I–129 with USCIS. This
form consists of a basic petition and
different supplements that apply to the
various visa categories. Therefore, an
employer petitioning for an H–2B
worker currently is required to file an I–
129 along with the I–129 H supplement.
This rule proposes to revise the current
I–129 H supplement to include an
attestation from the employer.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Employers will not be required to
submit a separate form, as previously
required with the labor certification.
Under this rule, the revised I–129 H
supplement, that includes the
attestation information required under
DOL regulations (20 CFR 655 subpart
A), will be filed along with the Form I–
129 to the USCIS. In a small number of
cases, DOL’s regulations may require
other labor documentation. DHS and
DOL have consulted and have jointly
determined that the proposed attestation
developed by DOL satisfies the
consultation mandate of section 214(c)
of the Act.
Second, DHS is proposing that most
employers seeking an H–2B temporary
worker file the Form I–129 and H
supplement through e-filing. This is a
significant change that will significantly
reduce the paper-based application
process and now require that most Form
I–129 petitions (including the H
supplement) be submitted to USCIS
electronically, through e-filing.
Employers who may continue to file
paper petitions are those in the logging,
entertainment, and professional
athletics industries, as well as those H–
2B employers in Guam. However, these
employers are encouraged to utilize efiling when submitting Form I–129
petitions, although these employers will
still be required to submit the
appropriate ‘‘paper’’ temporary labor
certification to the service center with
jurisdiction over the area of intended
employment.
DHS believes the e-filing process will
ensure expeditious processing of H–2B
petitions and limit the number of
potentially incomplete attestations. In
addition, it will ease the filing burden
on most petitioning employers. Through
e-filing, USCIS also will be able to
capture statistics more effectively and
analyze H–2B program data to identify
areas that need improvement as well as
any fraud or abuse that may lead to
future administrative, civil or criminal
enforcement actions against H–2B
petitioners and/or aliens.
DHS recognizes that the transition to
electronic submissions of H–2B
petitions, while an effective method for
streamlining the application process
and enhancing the effectiveness of the
H–2B program, also requires parallel
safeguards and protections to address
potential abuse or fraud in the e-filing
process. DHS notes that the submission
of materially false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statements to the government
already constitutes a violation of 18
U.S.C. 1001. Anyone convicted of a
violation of this provision may be fined
and/or imprisoned for not more than 5
years. To safeguard the e-filing process,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3985
DHS is incorporating a personal
identification number (PIN) and
password requirement for applications
or petitions submitted electronically.
This requirement will be in effect
within the DHS electronic filing system
prior to the effective date of the H–2B
process change and it will be extended
to this proposed H–2B process once the
process is finalized. DHS is soliciting
comments on the e-filing process for H–
2B petitions, the use of information
collected through the e-filing process for
future administrative, civil or criminal
enforcement actions, and the types of
additional safeguards that should be
adopted as part of the e-filing process.
DHS is considering the use of Public
Key Infrastructure (PKI) as an additional
safeguard to the e-filing process, and
encourages the public to provide
comments regarding the feasibility of
using PKI to this end. DHS also is
considering requiring the use of other
safeguards in order to authenticate the
identity of a party making an electronic
submission and to maintain the integrity
of the process. DHS is soliciting
comments on (1) alternative safeguards
that may be appropriate, and (2) the
risks that might be associated with an
inability to authenticate submissions.
Third, DHS is proposing to amend 8
CFR 214.2(h)(11)(i)(A) to require an
employer to provide notification to
USCIS within 30 days of the date that
the employer terminates the alien’s
employment or the alien leaves the
employment. This will ensure that an
approved H–2B petition filed by an
employer is closed out when the basis
for the alien’s status terminates and that
USCIS is made aware of the change in
employment status. DHS also may
develop a process whereby employers
may provide notification of termination
electronically, through e-filing, rather
than forwarding a paper notice to the
appropriate USCIS service center. DHS
is soliciting comments on this proposal.
Fourth, DHS is proposing to add new
paragraphs to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii), (F)
and (G), and new language to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(11)(iii)(A)(2) that establish a
process for USCIS to deny or revoke
approval of a Form I–129 if USCIS
determines that the statements on the
Form I–129 petition are inaccurate,
fraudulent, or misrepresented a material
fact. Upon such a determination, USCIS
may deny the petition pursuant to 8
CFR 214.2(h)(10) or initiate revocation
proceedings pursuant to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(11)(iii)(B).
Fifth, DHS is proposing to add a new
provision at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(20) to
establish a process whereby USCIS will
deny, for a specified period of time, all
petitions (immigrant and nonimmigrant)
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
3986
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
filed by an employer, based upon a
finding by DOL that an employer has
not complied with attestation
conditions (known as debarment). In a
separate rulemaking, at 20 CFR 655.13,
DOL is proposing an audit and
debarment process for employers who
are found not to have complied with the
required elements of the H–2B
attestation. If DOL determines that an
employer violated the conditions of the
attestation and recommends the
employer be debarred for a specified
period of time, upon notice from DOL,
USCIS will accept DOL’s
recommendation and debar the
petitioner from filing any immigrant or
nonimmigrant petitions under new
paragraph (h)(20). USCIS notes that it
may decide to debar a petitioning
employer for a longer period than that
recommended by DOL. This additional
measure will encourage petitioner
compliance with the proposed
attestation requirements of the H–2B
program. DHS is soliciting comments on
whether debarments recommended by
DOL should extend to an entity related
to the U.S. employer (e.g., an affiliate or
successor entity).
Sixth, DHS would like to develop a
self-initiated debarment process,
separate from the DOL audit and
debarment process, which will allow
USCIS to debar the petitioner upon a
finding by USCIS that the petitioner’s
statements in the Form I–129 petition
are inaccurate, fraudulent, or
misrepresent a material fact. Unlike the
DOL debarment process, which will be
based on random and selected audits of
the Form I–129 H Supplements that
accompany approved H–2B petitions,
USCIS will initiate proceedings when it
independently receives information,
including through the petition
adjudication process or separate
investigation (administrative, civil or
criminal), indicating that the
petitioner’s statements in the Form I–
129 petition are inaccurate, fraudulent,
or misrepresent a material fact (e.g.,
USCIS receives evidence that the ‘‘U.S.
employer’’ filing the Form I–129
petition actually is not a real company
or an organization licensed to do
business in the United States). DHS is
soliciting comments on process,
including suggestions on the type of
administrative process and procedures
that should be adopted for determining
that a petitioner should be debarred, the
appellate process and whether all
immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions
should be subject to debarment. DHS
also is soliciting comments on whether
debarments determined through the
USCIS self-initiated process should
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
extend to an entity related to the U.S.
employer (e.g., an affiliate or successor
entity).
Seventh, DHS is amending the current
regulations relating to the use of agents
as petitioners for H–2B temporary
workers. The current regulation at 8
CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(F) allows U.S. agents
to file petitions in cases involving
workers who are traditionally selfemployed or who use agents to arrange
short-term employment with numerous
employers, or in the case of foreign
employers. In addition, the current
regulations at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(F)
and (h)(6)(iii)(B) permit foreign
employers to use U.S. agents to petition
for H–2B temporary workers. This rule
proposes to no longer allow the filing of
H–2B petitions by agents.
This change is necessary in light of
the transition from a labor-certification
to an attestation-based petition process
for most H–2B petitioning employers. In
order to ensure the integrity of the H–
2B attestation process, H–2B attestations
must be made by the employer, not by
a recruiting agent. In addition, DHS
believes that it will be easier for USCIS
to take action against an employing
petitioner, who is making the
attestations required under the DOL
regulations at 20 CFR 655, subpart A,
than against an agent. DHS notes that
this is not restricting the use of agents
to recruit workers but is instead
requiring only that the employer
directly petition for the H–2B temporary
worker.
Eighth, this rule proposes to codify
the current numerical counting
procedures for the H–2B classification.
Title 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(ii)(A) already
provides that requests for petition
extension or extension of an H–2B
alien’s stay shall not count against the
numerical cap. DHS is amending 8 CFR
214.2(h)(8)(ii) by adding a new
paragraph (G) to reflect that, for
purposes of the H–2B numerical cap,
USCIS will not count amendments to
previously approved petitions or
petitions for aliens who already hold H–
2B status and are seeking to change
employers or add a new or additional
employer (e.g., concurrent
employment). An amended H–2B
petition is required in instances where
there has been a material change in the
terms and conditions of employment or
the alien’s eligibility for the
classification (e.g., a material change in
the duties performed by the alien). See
8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(E). USCIS is also
further amending 8 CFR 214.2 by adding
a new paragraph (h)(8)(ii)(H) to state
that an H–2B nonimmigrant who is
employed (or has received an offer of
employment) as a fish roe processor, a
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
fish roe technician, or a supervisor of
fish roe processing, shall not be subject
to the numerical limitation in a given
fiscal year. USCIS is adding new
paragraph (h)(8)(ii)(H) to comport with
section 14006 of the 2005 Department of
Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub.
L. 108–287, August 5, 2004).
Ninth, DHS is proposing to amend 8
CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iii) to require that
employers seeking a certain number of
aliens to fill H–2B positions only
specify the number of positions sought
and not name the individual alien on all
initial H–2B petitions (i.e., unnamed
beneficiaries), unless the beneficiary
already is in the United States. DHS is
requiring beneficiaries who are already
in the United States to be named, as
USCIS is responsible for adjudication of
the beneficiary’s eligibility for H–2B
status in such instances. USCIS will
require a named beneficiary in all
petitions where USCIS is responsible for
adjudication of the beneficiary’s
eligibility for H–2B status.
DHS is soliciting comments from the
public on whether USCIS should
require all H–2B beneficiaries to be
named, as such a requirement would
assist DHS in maintaining an accurate
count of the number of aliens granted
H–2B visas or accorded H–2B status
each fiscal year.
The beneficiary of a Form I–129 who
was previously in H–2B status for a
maximum 3-year period is eligible for a
subsequent maximum authorized period
of admission (up to one year initially
with possible extensions up to 3 years)
only if the alien has been outside the
United States for a period of 6 months
prior to filing of the petition.
Tenth, this rule proposes to amend 8
CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(B) to reflect that an
H–2B petition, if submitted via e-filing,
may not be filed more than 60 days
prior to the date of actual need for the
beneficiary’s services. DOL is
concurrently proposing regulations
stating that recruitment must occur
within 60 days of filing. To ensure
accuracy of the labor market test, DHS
is proposing to also limit advance filings
of H–2B petitions to a maximum period
of 60 days. In light of the new
streamlined procedures proposed in the
DOL and DHS companion rules, DHS is
confident that 60 days is a sufficient
amount of time to process the H–2B
petition and enable the beneficiary to
obtain a visa or be accorded H–2B
status. DHS solicits comments from the
public regarding this change.
Finally, in the event that an employer
has submitted an application for change
of status, an extension of status, or a
petition that requests named
beneficiaries and the security check
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
generates adverse information on a
beneficiary who is part of a multiplebeneficiary petition, DHS is proposing
to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) to
create a process that will allow for
issuance of a partial approval notice to
allow the petitioning employer to
receive authorization to employ the
remainder of the requested H–2B
workers. USCIS will continue to process
the petitions of the remaining workers
to completion.
Is DOL Proposing any Changes to the
Temporary Labor Certification Process?
Yes. DOL will propose in a separate
rulemaking to terminate the existing
labor certification process for most H–
2B employment, with certain
exceptions. These exceptions are
employers seeking H–2B workers in
logging, the entertainment industry, and
professional athletics. DOL has
traditionally applied a unique process
for workers who fall within these welldefined exceptions and DOL does not
intend to modify these unique processes
at this time. For all other H–2B
employment, instead of the current
labor certification process, elements of
the H–2B labor certification will be
incorporated into an attestation that will
be made to the U.S. Government in
accordance with DOL regulations. The
attestation will be filed electronically,
through e-filing, with the Form I–129
petition because the attestation will be
contained in the Form I–129 H
supplement. Employers will not be
required to submit a separate form, as
previously required with the labor
certification. Employers who may
continue to file paper petitions are those
in the logging, entertainment, and
professional athletics industries, as well
as those H–2B employers in Guam.
These employers are encouraged to
utilize e-filing when submitting Form I–
129 petitions, although these employers
will still be required to submit the
appropriate ‘‘paper’’ temporary labor
certification to the service center with
jurisdiction over the area of intended
employment. DOL will also propose in
a separate rulemaking an audit and
debarment process for employers who
are found not to have complied with the
required elements of the attestation.
What Is the Proposed Attestation
Process?
The attestation process for the H–2B
classification will be similar to the
process currently used for the H–1B
nonimmigrant classification. However,
the H–2B attestation will be submitted
to USCIS through e-filing. The
attestation will be contained in the
Form I–129 H supplement and most
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
employers will not be required to
submit a separate form, as previously
required with the labor certification.
The terms of the attestation are set forth
at 20 CFR 655 subpart A. Given that the
Form I–129 H supplement is currently
required to be submitted with the I–129
petition, DHS is proposing that Form I–
129 (including the H supplement that
contains the required attestations) be
submitted to USCIS through e-filing.
This process will ensure that all
required elements of the attestation are
completed before USCIS adjudicates the
petition. In cases where an employer is
still required to submit a labor
certification (i.e., for employment in
Guam and for other employment as
designated by DOL in its regulations),
the paper labor certification must be
submitted to the appropriate USCIS
service center regardless of whether the
petition was e-filed or not.
What Will Be the Required Elements of
the Attestation?
The elements of the attestation must
meet the DOL requirements set forth at
20 CFR 655, subpart A. If the attestation
is complete, and the H–2B petition is
otherwise approvable, the H–2B petition
may be approved for the length of time
specified by the petitioner or
determined by USCIS as meeting the
petitioner’s temporary need, a period
that may last for up to one year.
Approval of the H–2B petition will
constitute evidence that the attestation
(included in the Form I–129 H
Supplement) also has been accepted and
relied upon for purposes of supporting
the Form I–129 petition. The validity of
the petition and the beneficiary’s
authorized period of stay may be
extended in increments of up to one
year, for a maximum period of 3 years,
but may not be extended for any time
beyond the 3-year period. An employer
must submit a new Form I–129 H
supplement (which includes the
attestation) with each new Form I–129
petition.
Will the Changes to the Temporary
Labor Certification Process Cover All H–
2B Employment?
No. First, it should be noted that DOL
has no jurisdiction over Guam with
respect to labor certification; therefore
the Governor of Guam will retain his
authority to issue labor certifications
without modification. It has not been
demonstrated to DHS that the
employment situation in Guam requires
DHS to modify the current labor
certification provisions for prospective
employers in Guam. In addition, the
new attestation process will be required
only for those employers designated by
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3987
DOL at 20 CFR 655.3. Employers in the
logging, entertainment, and professional
athletics industries are not required to
submit an attestation, but must submit
a paper labor certification to the USCIS
service center with jurisdiction over the
area of intended employment.
What Is the Period of Petition Validity?
The USCIS service center director
may approve an H–2B petition for the
length of time specified by the
petitioner or determined by USCIS as
meeting the petitioner’s need, which in
certain instances may last for up to one
year. The period of validity of the
petition and the beneficiary’s authorized
period of stay may be extended for
additional periods of time, as
determined by USCIS based on the
specific circumstances of the employer,
but the petitioner may not be authorized
to employ the beneficiary beyond the
beneficiary’s maximum period of
authorized stay (up to one year initially
with possible extensions up to 3 years).
An employer must submit a new Form
I–129 H supplement (which includes
the attestation) in order to extend the
period of validity of a petition and to
obtain an extension of stay for the
beneficiary. For petitions filed for
employment in Guam, or for petitions
requiring labor certification, the
maximum period of admission will
remain one year and extensions of stay
may be granted for an individual
worker, in increments of one year, for a
maximum period of 3 years.
How Will USCIS Process Petitions With
Multiple Named Beneficiaries When
One of the Beneficiaries Takes Longer
Than the Others or a Security Check
Uncovers Adverse Information About
One of the Beneficiaries?
DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR
214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) to create a process that
will allow for issuance of a partial
approval notice in the event that an
employer has requested named
beneficiaries (for beneficiaries who
already are in the United States) and a
mandatory security check on one or
more of the requested beneficiaries takes
longer than the others or a security
check uncovers adverse information
about one of the beneficiaries.
Accordingly, DHS is proposing to
amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) so that,
in the event a security check takes more
time for one or more beneficiaries on a
multiple-beneficiary petition, or a
security check uncovers adverse
information about one of the
beneficiaries, USCIS may issue a partial
approval notice to the petitioner that
will name which beneficiaries are
authorized for H–2B status and
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
3988
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
employment, but exclude the name of
the beneficiary whose law enforcement
checks remain pending. This process
will allow USCIS to process H–2B
petitions more efficiently for the
majority of beneficiaries.
Will an Employer Be Permitted To
Substitute the Names of Beneficiaries on
a Petition Before USCIS Issues a Partial
Approval Notice?
No. In order to ensure that petitions
are processed as expeditiously as
possible, USCIS will make every
attempt to issue a partial approval
notice without prior notification or
contact with the petitioning employer.
The proposal to expedite processing in
this manner will not allow a petitioning
employer to substitute beneficiaries on
a pending petition.
Will an Employer Still Be Permitted To
Substitute Beneficiaries on a Petition
After USCIS Partial Approval but Prior
to an Alien’s Admission to the United
States?
Yes. This process does not require
amendments to the current substitution
process at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iv), which
allow for substitution of beneficiaries on
an approved petition, if an employer
requests named beneficiaries.
Will an Employer Be Permitted To
Substitute Beneficiaries Who Are
Already in the United States in H–2B
Status Into a Previously Approved
Petition?
No. DHS is concerned that such a
substitution would undermine other
proposals in the rule that are intended
to strengthen employer reporting
requirements. If an employer were
allowed to make post-admission
substitutions without notification to
USCIS, it would limit the ability of
USCIS to maintain accurate information
concerning the whereabouts and
activities of nonimmigrants under the
H–2B category. In addition, such
substitution would circumvent the
required background checks that are
currently run on individuals at the time
of visa issuance and at the time of
admission. Therefore, DHS is amending
language at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(D) and
8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iii) to clarify that an
employer will only be permitted to hire
H–2B nonimmigrants who are within
the United States if the employer files
a new H–2B petition naming the
beneficiary or beneficiaries.
How Will DHS and DOL Monitor and
Ensure the Integrity of the H–2B
Program?
DHS and DOL (through separate
rulemaking) are proposing several
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
amendments that will allow both
departments to monitor and ensure the
integrity of the H–2B program,
including DOL random and selected
audits of H–2B petitions, and debarment
of employers who have made willful
misrepresentations in the H–2B petition
or failed to comply with the attestation
requirements as required by DOL
regulations.
DHS is proposing to amend the
regulations at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(B)
to require that all United States
employers petition directly for the H–2B
beneficiary. This amendment will
preclude United States agents and/or
recruiters acting as agents from filing on
behalf of United States employers. DHS
is proposing to amend 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii)(D) to ensure that USCIS
processes are coordinated with the
results of random and selected audits of
attestations that the Secretary of Labor
will conduct pursuant to regulations to
be issued by DOL. Also, if USCIS
determines that an employer has failed
to comply with an attestation, USCIS
may deny the petition pursuant to 8
CFR 214.2(h)(10) or initiate revocation
proceedings pursuant to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(11).
In addition, DHS notes that there are
other laws that protect U.S. workers
such as the Fair Labor Standards Act
and section 274A of the Act,
respectively, as well as antidiscrimination statutes.
DOL, through separate rulemaking at
20 CFR part 655, subpart A, will
propose to conduct random and selected
audits of attestations that have been
submitted with the Form I–129 petition
to determine whether the information
provided by the employer is accurate
and is in compliance with the relevant
regulations.
DHS is proposing to add a new
paragraph (h)(20) to establish a process
whereby USCIS will deny all petitions
(immigrant and nonimmigrant) filed by
an employer for a specified period of
time, based upon a finding by DOL that
an employer has not complied with
attestation conditions (this is known as
debarment). In a separate rulemaking, at
20 CFR 655.13, DOL is proposing an
audit and debarment process for
employers who are found not to have
complied with the required elements of
the H–2B attestation. If DOL determines
that an employer violated the conditions
of the attestation and recommends the
employer be debarred from filing future
attestations for a specified period of
time, upon notice from DOL, USCIS will
accept DOL’s recommendation and
debar the petitioner from filing all
petitions under new paragraph (h)(20).
This process is similar to the H–1B
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
debarment process under section
212(n)(2)(C) of the Act. The proposed
regulation provides that DOL will
recommend, through its hearing
procedures, a period of debarment based
on the severity of the violation when it
notifies USCIS that a violation has
occurred. USCIS will accord
considerable weight to this
recommendation when it determines the
appropriate period of debarment for the
employer. The period of debarment
imposed by USCIS will be at least the
minimum period recommended by
DOL, but USCIS may choose to impose
a longer period of debarment.
As mentioned previously, USCIS is
also proposing to establish a selfinitiated debarment process separate
from the DOL audit and debarment
process. DHS solicits comments on the
administrative process and penalties
associated with this debarment process,
including the appellate process.
DHS also is considering establishing
administrative penalties for program
abusers such as requiring recruitment
reports with labor attestations. DHS
welcomes comments and suggestions on
whether DHS should establish
administrative penalties and, if so, the
type of administrative penalties that
should be imposed on non-compliant
H–2B employers.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DHS has reviewed this regulation in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), and, by
approving it, certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Although this rule may affect
small entities, it is intended to help
employers by eliminating certain
regulatory barriers in hiring H–2B
workers. This rule removes the
burdensome labor certification process
and replaces it with a simpler
attestation process for H–2B workers
that will facilitate processing within the
H–2B program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one-year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is considered by DHS to be
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review.
Accordingly, this regulation has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
DHS has considered both the costs
and the benefits of this rule as required
in Executive Order 12866 section (b)(6)
and has determined that the benefits of
this regulation outweigh any costs. That
determination is as follows: This
proposal is necessary to improve U.S.
employers’ use of the H–2B program
and access to necessary workers in a
timely fashion. The current H–2B
program requires a U.S. employer to
submit to a two-step process, involving
two separate agencies, before it can
obtain a foreign worker. Petitioning
employers must first file a labor
certification application with DOL and
DOL must approve the labor
certification before the employer may
file a petition with USCIS for approval
based on the labor certification. The
processing time and inherent delays
associated with this two-step process
negatively impact U.S. employers’
ability to achieve optimal staffing levels
in the time needed to meet their needs.
In addition to time delays, the two-step
process imposes additional costs in the
form of paperwork and correspondence
with two agencies.
By including the attestation in the
Form I–129 H supplement, DHS has
created a one-step process where certain
U.S. employers seeking H–2B temporary
workers now only will be required to
file one application package—the Form
I–129 with the Form I–129 H
supplement—with one agency, DHS.
This one-step process benefits
employers by reducing costs and delays
associated with separate USCIS petition
adjudication and DOL labor certification
processes, thereby allowing the
employer to be matched with a qualified
H–2B worker in a more timely fashion.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
The one-step process also alleviates
processing costs to the agencies due to
separate filing requirements. Finally,
these changes enhance the effectiveness
of the H–2B program while maintaining
integrity through enforcement by DOL
and DHS with debarment processes for
non-compliant H–2B employers. In
addition to consolidating the filing
process, this rule would make the actual
submission of the necessary information
itself easier (for eligible employers) by
incorporating the required attestations
into the Form I–129 H Supplement and
permitting petitioning employers to file
the required Form I–129 petition
(including the H supplement)
electronically, through e-filing.
In addition, because this rule
proposes to cease requiring named
beneficiaries for workers not in the
United States, within the context of
USCIS processing, this rule will further
alleviate processing delays that result
when USCIS performs background
checks on each named H–2B
beneficiary. DOS currently performs
background checks on all beneficiaries
before visa issuance, so this process
retains all requisite security measures
while eliminating duplication of work
between USCIS and DOS.
There are no new costs to the public
associated with this rule. No new or
additional requirements are being
created by this rule. Though the
revisions to the Form I–129 H
Supplement to include attestations as
required under DOL regulations (20 CFR
part 655, subpart A), are considered a
new information collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, these
revisions will not create any additional
burden on petitioning U.S. employers.
In fact, the revisions reduce the current
paperwork burden for such employers
by removing the requirement that
certain U.S. employers seeking an H–2B
temporary work comply with a two-step
filing process to obtain temporary labor
in this visa category.
3989
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132
Paperwork Reduction Act
Employers are currently required to
file a Form I–129 with the H
supplement when petitioning for H–2B
workers. This proposed rule revises the
current H supplement to require
petitioners to attest to certain
information on the H Supplement when
petitioning USCIS for H–2B workers.
This attestation is made to the U.S.
Government in accordance with DOL
regulations, and is provided to USCIS as
a part of the H Supplement with the
Form I–129 petition filing in order to
streamline processing. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, OMB
considers the attestation an information
collection requirement subject to
review. Accordingly, this information
collection has been submitted to OMB
for review. Written comments are
encouraged and will be accepted until
March 28, 2005. When submitting
comments on the information
collection, your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points.
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of the information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of any and all appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
The rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of information collection:
Revision.
(2) Title of Form/Collection: H
Supplement to USCIS Form I–129,
Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: H
Supplement to USCIS Form I–129, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
3990
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Individuals. The H
Supplement to Form I–129 is required
evidence for an employer petitioning for
an alien to come to the U.S. temporarily
to perform services or labor as an H–1B,
H–2A, H–2B or H–3 nonimmigrant
worker.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 368,948 inclusive of all I–129
filings at 2.75 hours per response.
(6) An estimate of the total of public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: Approximately 1,014,607
burden hours inclusive of all I–129
filings.
All comments and suggestions or
questions regarding additional
information should be directed to the
Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Regulatory Management Division, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529; Attention:
Richard A. Sloan, Director, 202–514–
3291.
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 214
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aliens, Employment,
Foreign officials, Health professions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Students.
Accordingly, part 214 of chapter I of
title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 214—NONIMMIGRANT CLASSES
1. The authority citation for part 214
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1102, 1103, 1182,
1184, 1185 (pursuant to Executive Order
13323, published January 2, 2004), 1186a,
1187, 1221, 1281, 1282, 1301–1305; 1372;
1379; 1731–32; sec. 14006, Pub. L. 108–287;
sec. 643, Pub. L. 104–208; 110 Stat. 3009–
708; section 141 of the Compacts of Free
Association with the Federated States of
Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, and with the Government of Palau,
48 U.S.C. 1901, note, and 1931, note,
respectively.
2. Section 214.2 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(D);
b. Revising paragraphs (h)(2)(i)(A),
(C), and (D);
c. Revising the term ‘‘A United States
agent’’ to read: ‘‘Except in the case of a
petition for an H–2B worker, a United
States agent’’ at the beginning of
paragraph (h)(2)(i)(F), introductory text;
d. Revising paragraphs (h)(2)(ii) and
(iii);
e. Revising paragraphs (h)(6)(iii)(A),
(B), (C), (D) and (E);
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
f. Adding new paragraphs (h)(6)(iii)(F)
and (G);
g. Revising paragraph (h)(6)(iv);
h. Revising paragraphs (h)(6)(vi)(A),
(B), (C) and (D);
i. Adding new paragraphs (h)(8)(ii)(G)
and (H);
j. Revising paragraphs (h)(9)(i)(A) and
(B), (h)(9)(iii)(B)(1) and (h)(9)(iii)(B)(2)(i)
and (ii);
k. Adding introductory text to
paragraph (h)(11)(i);
l. Revising paragraphs (h)(11)(i)(A)
and (h)(11)(iii)(A)(2);
m. Revising paragraph (h)(13)(iv);
n. Revising paragraph (h)(15)(ii)(C);
o. Redesignating paragraph
(h)(15)(ii)(D) as (h)(15)(ii)(E) and by
adding a new paragraph (h)(15)(ii)(D);
and by
p. Adding a new paragraph (h)(20).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 214.2 Special requirements for
admission, extension, and maintenance of
status.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) An H–2B classification applies to
an alien who is coming temporarily to
the United States to perform
nonagricultural work of a temporary or
seasonal nature, if unemployed persons
capable of performing such service or
labor cannot be found in this country.
This classification does not apply to
graduates of medical schools coming to
the United States to perform services as
members of the medical profession. The
temporary or permanent nature of the
services or labor to be performed shall
be determined by the USCIS. This
classification also requires a labor
certification or attestation, as prescribed
by the Department of Labor at 20 CFR
655.3.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Petitions—(i) Filing of petitions—
(A) General. A United States employer
seeking to classify an alien as an H–1B,
H–2A, H–2B, or H–3 temporary
employee shall file a petition on Form
I–129, Petition for Nonimmigrant
Worker with the Form I–129 H
supplement, only with the service
center which has jurisdiction in the area
where the alien will perform services, or
receive training, even in emergent
situations, except as provided in this
paragraph. With the exception of
employers seeking H–2B workers in
logging, the entertainment industry, and
professional athletics, a United States
employer seeking to classify an alien as
an H–2B temporary employee shall file
electronically, through e-filing, the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Form I–129 petition with H Supplement
as provided in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(C).
For U.S. employers seeking H–2B
temporary workers in logging, the
entertainment industry, and
professional athletics, the U.S. employer
may e-file the Form I–129, or file the
paper Form I–129 with the required
temporary labor certification to the
USCIS service center that has
jurisdiction over the area where the
alien will perform services. Regardless
of which filing option U.S. employers in
logging, the entertainment industry, and
professional athletics choose, such
employers will still be required to
submit a paper temporary labor
certification to the USCIS service center
with jurisdiction over the area of
intended employment. A United States
employer seeking to classify an alien as
an H–1C nonimmigrant registered nurse
shall file a petition on Form I–129 at the
Vermont Service Center. Petitions in
Guam and the Virgin Islands, and
petitions involving special filing
situations as determined by USCIS
Headquarters, shall be filed with the
local USCIS office or a designated
USCIS office. The petitioner may submit
a legible photocopy of a document in
support of the visa petition in lieu of the
original document. However, the
original document shall be submitted if
requested by the USCIS.
*
*
*
*
*
(C) Services or training for more than
one employer. If the beneficiary will
perform nonagricultural services for, or
receive training from more than one
United States employer, each employer
must file a separate petition, the Form
I–129 with H Supplement, and, if
required, a labor certification with the
service center that has jurisdiction over
the area where the alien will perform
services or receive training.
(D) Change of employers. If the alien
is in the United States and seeks to
change employers, the prospective new
employer (except in the case of H–2As),
must file a petition on Form I–129, with
the fee required in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)
and, if required, with a labor
certification, naming the beneficiary,
and requesting classification and
extension of the alien’s stay in the
United States. A prospective new
employer may not substitute an alien
who is within the United States into any
previously approved petition. If the new
petition is approved, the extension of
stay may be granted for the validity of
the approved petition. The validity of
the petition and the alien’s extension of
stay must conform to the limits on the
alien’s temporary stay that are
prescribed in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(13). The
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
alien is not authorized to begin the
employment with the new petitioner
until the petition is approved.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Multiple beneficiaries. More than
one beneficiary may be included in an
H–1C, H–2A, H–2B, or H–3 petition,
and a labor certification or attestation
for H–2B petitions, if the beneficiaries
will be performing the same service, or
receiving the same training, for the same
period of time, and in the same location.
(iii) Named beneficiaries. An H–2B
petition shall not include the name(s) of
the beneficiary(ies) at the time of filing,
unless the beneficiary is within the
United States. For employment that
requires labor certification, if all of the
beneficiaries covered by an H–2B labor
certification have not been identified at
the time a petition is filed, multiple
petitions may be filed at different times
with a copy of the same labor
certification; however, each petition
must have been filed within 90 days of
certification. Each petition must
reference all previously filed petitions
for that labor certification. For H–2B
employment that requires an attestation,
a U.S. employer must file a new Form
I–129 H Supplement with each petition
filed on behalf of name beneficiaries.
The Form I–129 H Supplement must
reflect the same number of beneficiaries
that are being requested on the H–2B
petition. An initial H–2A petition may
contain both named and unnamed
beneficiaries and the total number of
beneficiaries must agree with the
number of positions on the labor
certification request. The number stated
on the labor certification or Form I–129
H Supplement does not need to agree
with the number of aliens requested on
a subsequent request for extension.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) With the exceptions of
employment for which the Department
of Labor provides labor certification,
when filing a petition with the director
to classify an alien as an H–2B worker,
the petitioner shall submit an H
Supplement, that includes an attestation
that complies with 20 CFR part 655,
subpart A, for each United States
metropolitan statistical area in which a
beneficiary will be employed. In the
territory of Guam, the petitioning
employer shall apply for temporary
labor certification with the Governor of
Guam. For other employment for which
the Department of Labor requires labor
certification, the petitioning employer
shall apply for temporary labor
certification with the Secretary of Labor.
The labor certification or Form I–129 H
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Supplement shall be considered
sufficient evidence that no United States
workers capable of performing the
temporary services or labor are available
and that the alien’s employment will
not adversely affect the wages and
working conditions of similarly
employed United States workers.
(B) An H–2B petition may only be
filed by the employer seeking to hire an
individual as an H–2B temporary
worker. An agent may not file an H–2B
petition on behalf of any employer. The
petitioning employer shall consider
available United States workers for the
temporary services or labor, and shall
offer terms and conditions of
employment which are consistent with
the nature of the occupation, activity,
and industry in the United States.
(C) The petitioner may not file an H–
2B petition unless the United States
petitioner has submitted a Form I–129 H
Supplement or otherwise has applied
for and received the appropriate labor
certification as prescribed by the
Department of Labor at 20 CFR 655.3.
H–2B petitions must be filed
electronically with the Form I–129 and
H supplement through e-filing at the
appropriate DHS website, unless the
application requires a DOL temporary
labor certification. A new H supplement
must be filed with each Form I–129
petition and must reflect the same
number of workers requested on the
Form I–129 petition. All applications for
labor certification or I–129 H
supplements must be filed within the
time limits prescribed or accepted by
each category.
(D) The Governor of Guam shall
separately establish procedures for
providing temporary labor certifications.
Furthermore, the Secretary of Labor
shall separately establish procedures for
providing temporary labor certifications
for employers seeking H–2B workers in
logging, the entertainment industry, and
professional athletics. The Secretary of
Labor may implement a program to
conduct random and selected audits to
ensure the integrity of the attestation
portion of the I–129 H supplement and
to ensure compliance with the relevant
regulatory provisions.
(E) For petitions that require a labor
certification from the Governor of Guam
for employment in Guam or from the
Secretary of Labor for other
employment, as prescribed by the
Department of Labor at 20 CFR 655.3,
the petitioner may file a paper Form I–
129 with the required paper labor
certification to the appropriate USCIS
service center with jurisdiction over the
area where the alien will perform
services.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3991
(F) The certification from the
Governor of Guam or the Secretary of
Labor is advisory in nature and does not
establish the temporary nature of the
position or the beneficiary’s eligibility.
The service center director may deny
the H–2B petition, pursuant to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(10) if the director determines
that the statements on the Form I–129
petition were inaccurate, fraudulent, or
misrepresented a material fact.
(G) The service center director may
institute revocation proceedings as
described in paragraph (h)(11) of this
section if the director determines that
the statements on the Form I–129
petition were inaccurate, fraudulent, or
misrepresented a material fact.
(iv) Labor certifications for H–2B
employment—(A) Labor certifications.
For H–2B employment requiring a labor
certification, an H–2B petition for
temporary employment shall be
accompanied by:
(1) A certification from the Secretary
of Labor stating that qualified workers
in the United States are not available
and that the alien’s employment will
not adversely affect wages and working
conditions of similarly employed
United States workers; or
(2) A notice stating the reasons why
such certification cannot be made. Such
notice shall address the availability of
United States workers in the occupation
and the prevailing wages and working
conditions of United States workers in
the occupation.
(B) Attachment to a petition requiring
labor certification. If the petitioner
receives a notice from the Secretary of
Labor that certification cannot be made,
a petition containing countervailing
evidence must be filed with the service
center director. The evidence must
show that qualified workers in the
United States are not available, and that
the terms and conditions of employment
are consistent with the nature of the
occupation, activity, and industry in the
United States. All such evidence
submitted shall be considered in
adjudicating the petition. The
countervailing evidence presented by
the petitioner shall be in writing and
shall address availability of United
States workers, the prevailing wage rate
for the occupation in the United States,
and each of the reasons why the
Secretary of Labor could not grant a
labor certification. The petitioner may
also submit other appropriate
information in support of the petition.
The director, at his or her discretion,
may require additional supporting
evidence.
(C) U.S. Virgin Islands. Labor
certifications filed under section
101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Act for
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
3992
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
employment in the United States Virgin
Islands may be approved only for
entertainers and athletes and only for
periods not to exceed 45 days.
(D) Validity period for labor
certifications. The Secretary of Labor
may issue a temporary labor
certification for a period up to one year.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
(A) Labor certification or notice. A
temporary labor certification or a notice
that certification cannot be made issued
by the Governor of Guam in the case of
employment in Guam; a temporary labor
certification or notice that certification
cannot be made issued by the Secretary
of Labor in the case of employment for
which labor certification is required;
(B) Countervailing evidence. Evidence
to rebut the Governor of Guam’s or, in
the case of employment for which the
Department of Labor requires labor
certification, the Secretary of Labor’s
notice that certification cannot be made;
(C) Alien’s qualifications.
Documentation that the alien qualifies
for the job offer as specified in the
application for labor certification or
petition (including the H supplement),
except in petitions where the labor
certification or petition (including the H
supplement) requires no education,
training, experience, or special
requirements of the beneficiary; and
(D) Statement of need. A statement
describing in detail the temporary
situation or conditions which make it
necessary to bring the alien to the
United States and whether the need is
a one-time occurrence, seasonal,
peakload, or intermittent and lasting
less than one year. If the need is
seasonal, peakload, or intermittent, the
statement shall indicate whether the
situation or conditions are expected to
be recurrent. The statement shall be
made on the Form I–129 H supplement,
which must be filed concurrently with
the H–2B petition.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) USCIS will not count towards the
numerical limitation in a given fiscal
year petitions requesting extensions of
H–2B status, amendments to previously
approved H–2B petitions, or petitions
for aliens who already hold H–2B status
and are seeking to change employers or
add an additional employer (i.e.
concurrent employment).
(H) The numerical limitation in a
given fiscal year shall not apply to an
H–2B nonimmigrant who is employed
(or has received an offer of employment)
as a fish roe processor, a fish roe
technician, or a supervisor of fish roe
processing.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
(9) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) If a petitioner has requested
named beneficiaries because the
beneficiaries are within the United
States, the approval notice shall include
the name of each beneficiary approved
for that classification. Further, all
approval notices shall include the
requested classification and the
petition’s period of validity. A petition
for more than one beneficiary and/or
multiple services may be approved in
whole or in part. In the event that a
security check for one of the requested
beneficiaries takes more time than is
required for the other beneficiaries on a
multiple-beneficiary petition, USCIS
may issue a partial approval notice
without notifying the petitioner of the
specific information relating to the
beneficiary(ies) not included on the
approval notice. The approval notice
shall identify only those beneficiaries
approved for classification under
section 101(a)(15)(H) of the Act.
(B) An H–2B petition, if submitted via
e-filing, may not be filed more than 60
days prior to the date of actual need for
the beneficiary’s services.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(B) * * *
(1)(i) General. Except as provided in
paragraph (h)(9)(iii)(B)(1)(ii) of this
section, the approval of a petition to
accord an alien a classification under
section 101(a)(15)(ii)(b) of the Act shall
be valid for the length of time as
determined by the USCIS as meeting the
petitioner’s need, not to exceed a period
of up to one year.
(ii) Labor certification attached. If a
certification by the Governor of Guam or
the Secretary of Labor is attached to a
petition to accord an alien a
classification under section
101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Act, the
approval of the petition may be valid for
a period of up to one year.
(2) * * *
(i) Countervailing evidence. If a
petition is submitted containing a notice
from the Governor of Guam that
certification cannot be made, and is not
accompanied by countervailing
evidence, the petitioner shall be
informed that he or she may submit the
countervailing evidence in accordance
with paragraph (h)(6)(iii)(E) of this
section.
(ii) Approval. In any case where the
service center director decides that
approval of the H–2B petition is
warranted despite the issuance of a
notice by the Governor of Guam that
certification cannot be made, the
approval shall be certified by the service
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
center director to the Director,
Administrative Appeals Office,
pursuant to 8 CFR 103.4. In emergent
situations, the certification may be
presented by telephone to the Director,
Administrative Appeals Office,
Headquarters. If approved, the petition
is valid for the period of established
need not to exceed one year. There is no
appeal from a decision that has been
certified to the Director, Administrative
Appeals Office.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) * * *
(i) General. The service center
director may revoke a petition at any
time, even after the expiration of the
approval of the petition.
(A) The petitioner shall immediately
notify USCIS of any changes in the
terms and conditions of employment of
a beneficiary which may affect
eligibility under section 101(a)(15)(H) of
the Act and 8 CFR 214.2(h). A new
Form I–129 H supplement and an
amended petition on Form I–129 shall
be filed when the petitioner continues
to employ the beneficiary. If the
petitioner no longer employs the
beneficiary, the petitioner shall report
explaining the change(s) within 30 days,
unless the reason the beneficiary is no
longer employed is due solely to the
expiration of his or her period of
authorized admission as an H
nonimmigrant. The notification shall
include the name of the petitioner and
beneficiary, the receipt number for the
approved petition, whether the
beneficiary began employment with the
petitioner, the dates the beneficiary was
employed by the petitioner, if
applicable, and a statement of the
reason the beneficiary is no longer
employed by the petitioner.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) The statement of facts contained in
the petition were not true and correct or
the assertions made in the labor
attestation were inaccurate, fraudulent,
or misrepresented a material fact; or
*
*
*
*
*
(13) * * *
(iv) H–2B and H–3 limitation on
admission. An H–2B alien who has
spent 3 years in the United States under
section 101(a)(15)(H) and/or (L) of the
Act; an H–3 alien participant in a
special education program who has
spent 18 months in the United States
under section 101(a)(15)(H) and/or (L) of
the Act; and an H–3 alien trainee who
has spent 24 months in the United
States under section 101(a)(15)(H) and/
or (L) of the Act is not eligible for an
extension, change status, or readmission
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
to the United States under section
101(a)(15)(H) and/or (L) of the Act
unless the alien has resided and been
physically present outside the United
States for the immediate prior 6 months.
*
*
*
*
*
(15) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) H–2A extension of stay. An
extension of stay for the beneficiary of
an H–2A petition may be authorized for
a period of up to one year, but not
beyond the validity of the temporary
labor certification, except as provided
for in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(5)(x).
(D) H–2B extension of stay. For
employment on Guam and for other
groups requiring labor certification, an
extension of stay for the beneficiary of
an H–2B petition may be authorized for
the validity of the labor certification or
for a period of up to one year. For all
other H–2B petitions, an extension of
stay may be authorized for the petition
validity period or for a period of up to
one year. In all cases, the alien’s total
period of stay as an H–2B worker may
not exceed 3 years, except that in the
Virgin Islands, the alien’s total period of
stay may not exceed 45 days.
*
*
*
*
*
(20) Debarments. Upon notification to
USCIS that the Secretary of Labor has
made a finding that the petitioning
employer has violated the H–2B
attestation requirements, the USCIS will
not approve immigrant petitions under
section 204 of the Act or nonimmigrant
petitions under section 214(c) of the Act
for at least the minimum period of time
recommended by the Secretary of Labor.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 13, 2005.
Tom Ridge,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05–1240 Filed 1–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 655
RIN 1205–AB36
Post-Adjudication Audits of H–2B
Petitions in All Occupations Other
Than Excepted Occupations in the
United States
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCIES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:31 Jan 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
An H–2B nonimmigrant is
admitted temporarily to the United
States to perform temporary
nonagricultural labor or services. The
Department of Labor’s Employment and
Training Administration (DOL or ETA)
and the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) simultaneously are
proposing changes to the procedures for
the issuance of H–2B visas. Under this
proposed rule, H–2B petitions filed with
DHS, with the exception of workers in
logging, the entertainment industry, or
professional athletics, will require
employers to satisfy specific attestations
concerning labor market issues. These
attestations have been developed by the
DOL and are included in this rule and
are incorporated in the DHS regulation.
In addition, the DOL will receive
information on petitions that have been
approved and received final
adjudication from the DHS. The DOL
will be conducting post-adjudication
audits of attestations submitted in
support of selected approved H–2B
petitions received from the DHS.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments on the
proposed rule on or before February 28,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 1205–AB36, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
website instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Comments may be
submitted by e-mail to
H2B.Comments@dol.gov. Include RIN
1205–AB36 in the subject line of the
message.
• U.S. Mail: Submit written
comments to the Assistant Secretary,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room C–4312, Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: William Carlson, Chief,
Division of Foreign Labor Certification.
Because of security measures, mail
directed to Washington, DC is
sometimes delayed. We will only
consider comments postmarked by the
U.S. Postal Service or other delivery
service on or before the deadline for
comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the RIN 1205–AB36 for
this rulemaking. Receipt of submissions
will not be acknowledged. Because DOL
continues to experience occasional
delays in receiving postal mail in the
Washington, DC area, commenters using
mail are encouraged to submit any
comments early.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3993
Comments will be available for public
inspection during normal business
hours at the address listed above for
mailed comments. Persons who need
assistance to review the comments will
be provided with appropriate aids such
as readers or print magnifiers. Copies of
this proposed rule may be obtained in
alternative formats (e.g., large print,
Braille, audiotape, or disk) upon
request. To schedule an appointment to
review the comments and/or to obtain
the proposed rule in an alternative
format, contact the Division of Foreign
Labor Certification at (202) 693–3010
(this is not a toll-free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Carlson, Chief, Division of
Foreign Labor Certification,
Employment and Training
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room C–4312,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202)
693–3010 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Currently, 20 CFR part 655, subpart A,
provides that a petitioner seeking to
employ an H–2B nonimmigrant must
establish that employment of the alien
will not adversely affect United States
workers who are capable of performing
such services or labor and the
employment of the alien will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed
United States workers. A petitioner may
not file a petition with the DHS for an
H–2B temporary worker unless the
employer has applied for and received
a labor certification from DOL or the
Governor of Guam, as appropriate. In
order to obtain a labor certification, a
prospective employer must test the
United States labor market and, in
addition, agree to pay the alien a salary
that will not adversely affect the wages
of United States workers similarly
employed. A petitioner must
demonstrate that the need for the
temporary services or labor is a one-time
occurrence, a seasonal need, a peak load
need, or an intermittent need. The
period of the petitioner’s need must be
less than one year.
II. Proposal
1. Process
Under the redesigned H–2B program,
the DHS will continue to administer the
petition adjudication process. However,
the employer now will be required to
conduct recruitment before filing its
petition. The employer also will be
required to submit, as part of its
petition, attestations concerning labor
E:\FR\FM\27JAP2.SGM
27JAP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 17 (Thursday, January 27, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3984-3993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1240]
[[Page 3983]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Homeland Security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 CFR Part 214
Petitions for Aliens to Perform Temporary Nonagricultural Services or
Labor (H-2B); Proposed Rule
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Employment and Training Adminstration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 CFR Part 655
Post-Adjudication Audits of H-2B Petitions in All Occupations Other
Than Excepted Occupations in the United States; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3984]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 214
[DHS No. 2004-0033]
RIN 1615-AA82
Petitions for Aliens To Perform Temporary Nonagricultural
Services or Labor (H-2B)
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: An H-2B alien is someone who comes temporarily to the United
States to perform temporary nonagricultural labor or services. The
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), after consulting with the
Department of Labor (DOL) and the Department of State (DOS), is
proposing significant changes to its regulations that are designed to
increase the effectiveness of the H-2B nonimmigrant classification.
This proposed rule will facilitate use of the H-2B program by United
States employers who are unable to find United States workers to
perform the temporary labor or services for which the H-2B nonimmigrant
is sought. Through this proposed rule, DHS has created a one-step
application process whereby certain U.S. employers seeking H-2B
temporary workers now will only be required to file one application--
the Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, which will include a
modified H supplement containing certain labor attestations. With
limited exceptions, U.S. employers will no longer need to file for or
receive a labor certification from the Department of Labor. In
addition, DHS is reducing significantly the paper-based application
process by now requiring that most Form I-129 petitions (including the
H supplement) be submitted to USCIS electronically, through e-filing.
DHS anticipates that this one-step process and the e-filing will
enhance the effectiveness of the H-2B program, reduce costs and delays
associated with separate USCIS petition adjudication and DOL labor
certification processes, and will match a U.S. employer with a
qualified H-2B worker in a more timely fashion. Finally, this proposed
rule makes changes that will maintain the integrity of the program
through enforcement mechanisms while retaining the current definition
of the word ``temporary'' in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(ii) in order to ensure
continued availability of the program to its traditional users. These
proposals will increase the efficiency of the program by eliminating
certain regulatory barriers, and improve Government coordination.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before February 28,
2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 1615-AA82 or DHS
Docket DHS-2004-0033 by one of the following methods:
EPA Federal Partner EDOCKET Web site: https://www.epa.gov/
feddocket. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the Web
site.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: rfs.regs@dhs.gov. When submitting comments
electronically, please include RIN 1615-AA82 or DHS-2004-0033 in the
subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand-delivered/Courier: Director, Regulatory
Management Division, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20529.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the DHS-2004-
0033 or RIN 1615-AA82. All comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket. You may also
access the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitted comments may also be inspected at Regulatory Management
Division, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by
calling (202) 514-3291.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin J. Cummings, Adjudications
Officer, Office of Program and Regulation Development, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529, telephone
(202) 353-8177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. DHS also invites comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism affects that might result from this
proposed rule. Comments that will provide the most assistance to DHS in
developing these procedures will reference a specific portion of the
proposed rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include data, information, or authority that support such recommended
change. See ADDRESSES above for information on how to submit comments.
What Is an H-2B Nonimmigrant?
Section 101(a)(15)(h)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(Act) describes an H-2B alien as an alien coming temporarily to the
United States to perform temporary nonagricultural labor or services.
This definition is reflected at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(1)(ii)(D) and (h)(6)(i).
Why Is DHS Proposing To Issue This Regulation?
The H-2B program has existed without substantial modification since
1952. In 1990, Congress attached a limitation on the number of H-2B
workers but otherwise the program has not changed to accommodate
employers' needs or to offer worker protections. After consulting with
DOL and DOS and reviewing the definitions and procedures currently used
to regulate the H-2B program, DHS has determined that the H-2B process
should be modified to reduce unnecessary burdens that hinder
petitioning employers' ability to effectively use this visa category.
The current rules require employers to obtain temporary labor
certification from the Secretary of Labor before obtaining permission
to engage an H-2B worker. The delays in processing applications for
labor certification combined with the relatively short period of time
for which the worker will be available under current rules have
discouraged use of the program. This rule will remove existing
regulatory barriers and thus likely lead to more efficiency in the H-2B
program.
What Is the Current Petitioning Process for an H-2B Nonimmigrant?
Section 214(c) of the Act provides that the Secretary of Homeland
Security, after consultation with appropriate
[[Page 3985]]
entities of the Government and upon petition of the importing employer,
will determine whether an alien may be imported as a H-2B nonimmigrant
temporary worker. 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(1). Historically, the consultation
requirement has been accomplished by receiving a labor certification
from DOL; however, the nature of the consultation is not defined in the
statute.
The current regulation at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6) provides that a
petitioner seeking to employ an H-2B nonimmigrant must establish that
the alien will not displace United States workers who are capable of
performing such services or labor and that the employment of the alien
will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of United
States workers. An employer may not file a petition for an H-2B
temporary worker unless that employer has obtained a labor
certification from the Secretary of Labor. To obtain a labor
certification, a prospective employer must test the labor market and,
in addition, pay the alien a salary that will not adversely affect the
United States labor market. A petitioner must demonstrate that the need
for the temporary services or labor is a one-time occurrence, a
seasonal need, a peakload need, or an intermittent need. In general,
the period of the petitioner's need must be less than one year.
Extensions beyond the one-year period of time can be approved in
extraordinary circumstances. In determining whether a petitioner's need
is temporary, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
examines the nature of the petitioner's need, not the nature of the
beneficiary's proposed duties.
What Changes Is DHS Proposing in This Rule?
To better accommodate the needs of United States employers that
utilize the H-2B program, DHS is proposing a number of significant
changes to the H-2B classification.
First, DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2) to require most
employers seeking an H-2B temporary worker to submit an attestation
that meets the requirements of DOL regulations. Currently, an employer
seeking a temporary worker is required to file the Form I-129 with
USCIS. This form consists of a basic petition and different supplements
that apply to the various visa categories. Therefore, an employer
petitioning for an H-2B worker currently is required to file an I-129
along with the I-129 H supplement. This rule proposes to revise the
current I-129 H supplement to include an attestation from the employer.
Employers will not be required to submit a separate form, as previously
required with the labor certification. Under this rule, the revised I-
129 H supplement, that includes the attestation information required
under DOL regulations (20 CFR 655 subpart A), will be filed along with
the Form I-129 to the USCIS. In a small number of cases, DOL's
regulations may require other labor documentation. DHS and DOL have
consulted and have jointly determined that the proposed attestation
developed by DOL satisfies the consultation mandate of section 214(c)
of the Act.
Second, DHS is proposing that most employers seeking an H-2B
temporary worker file the Form I-129 and H supplement through e-filing.
This is a significant change that will significantly reduce the paper-
based application process and now require that most Form I-129
petitions (including the H supplement) be submitted to USCIS
electronically, through e-filing. Employers who may continue to file
paper petitions are those in the logging, entertainment, and
professional athletics industries, as well as those H-2B employers in
Guam. However, these employers are encouraged to utilize e-filing when
submitting Form I-129 petitions, although these employers will still be
required to submit the appropriate ``paper'' temporary labor
certification to the service center with jurisdiction over the area of
intended employment.
DHS believes the e-filing process will ensure expeditious
processing of H-2B petitions and limit the number of potentially
incomplete attestations. In addition, it will ease the filing burden on
most petitioning employers. Through e-filing, USCIS also will be able
to capture statistics more effectively and analyze H-2B program data to
identify areas that need improvement as well as any fraud or abuse that
may lead to future administrative, civil or criminal enforcement
actions against H-2B petitioners and/or aliens.
DHS recognizes that the transition to electronic submissions of H-
2B petitions, while an effective method for streamlining the
application process and enhancing the effectiveness of the H-2B
program, also requires parallel safeguards and protections to address
potential abuse or fraud in the e-filing process. DHS notes that the
submission of materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements to
the government already constitutes a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
Anyone convicted of a violation of this provision may be fined and/or
imprisoned for not more than 5 years. To safeguard the e-filing
process, DHS is incorporating a personal identification number (PIN)
and password requirement for applications or petitions submitted
electronically. This requirement will be in effect within the DHS
electronic filing system prior to the effective date of the H-2B
process change and it will be extended to this proposed H-2B process
once the process is finalized. DHS is soliciting comments on the e-
filing process for H-2B petitions, the use of information collected
through the e-filing process for future administrative, civil or
criminal enforcement actions, and the types of additional safeguards
that should be adopted as part of the e-filing process.
DHS is considering the use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) as an
additional safeguard to the e-filing process, and encourages the public
to provide comments regarding the feasibility of using PKI to this end.
DHS also is considering requiring the use of other safeguards in order
to authenticate the identity of a party making an electronic submission
and to maintain the integrity of the process. DHS is soliciting
comments on (1) alternative safeguards that may be appropriate, and (2)
the risks that might be associated with an inability to authenticate
submissions.
Third, DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(11)(i)(A) to
require an employer to provide notification to USCIS within 30 days of
the date that the employer terminates the alien's employment or the
alien leaves the employment. This will ensure that an approved H-2B
petition filed by an employer is closed out when the basis for the
alien's status terminates and that USCIS is made aware of the change in
employment status. DHS also may develop a process whereby employers may
provide notification of termination electronically, through e-filing,
rather than forwarding a paper notice to the appropriate USCIS service
center. DHS is soliciting comments on this proposal.
Fourth, DHS is proposing to add new paragraphs to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii), (F) and (G), and new language to 8 CFR
214.2(h)(11)(iii)(A)(2) that establish a process for USCIS to deny or
revoke approval of a Form I-129 if USCIS determines that the statements
on the Form I-129 petition are inaccurate, fraudulent, or
misrepresented a material fact. Upon such a determination, USCIS may
deny the petition pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(10) or initiate revocation
proceedings pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(11)(iii)(B).
Fifth, DHS is proposing to add a new provision at 8 CFR
214.2(h)(20) to establish a process whereby USCIS will deny, for a
specified period of time, all petitions (immigrant and nonimmigrant)
[[Page 3986]]
filed by an employer, based upon a finding by DOL that an employer has
not complied with attestation conditions (known as debarment). In a
separate rulemaking, at 20 CFR 655.13, DOL is proposing an audit and
debarment process for employers who are found not to have complied with
the required elements of the H-2B attestation. If DOL determines that
an employer violated the conditions of the attestation and recommends
the employer be debarred for a specified period of time, upon notice
from DOL, USCIS will accept DOL's recommendation and debar the
petitioner from filing any immigrant or nonimmigrant petitions under
new paragraph (h)(20). USCIS notes that it may decide to debar a
petitioning employer for a longer period than that recommended by DOL.
This additional measure will encourage petitioner compliance with the
proposed attestation requirements of the H-2B program. DHS is
soliciting comments on whether debarments recommended by DOL should
extend to an entity related to the U.S. employer (e.g., an affiliate or
successor entity).
Sixth, DHS would like to develop a self-initiated debarment
process, separate from the DOL audit and debarment process, which will
allow USCIS to debar the petitioner upon a finding by USCIS that the
petitioner's statements in the Form I-129 petition are inaccurate,
fraudulent, or misrepresent a material fact. Unlike the DOL debarment
process, which will be based on random and selected audits of the Form
I-129 H Supplements that accompany approved H-2B petitions, USCIS will
initiate proceedings when it independently receives information,
including through the petition adjudication process or separate
investigation (administrative, civil or criminal), indicating that the
petitioner's statements in the Form I-129 petition are inaccurate,
fraudulent, or misrepresent a material fact (e.g., USCIS receives
evidence that the ``U.S. employer'' filing the Form I-129 petition
actually is not a real company or an organization licensed to do
business in the United States). DHS is soliciting comments on process,
including suggestions on the type of administrative process and
procedures that should be adopted for determining that a petitioner
should be debarred, the appellate process and whether all immigrant and
nonimmigrant petitions should be subject to debarment. DHS also is
soliciting comments on whether debarments determined through the USCIS
self-initiated process should extend to an entity related to the U.S.
employer (e.g., an affiliate or successor entity).
Seventh, DHS is amending the current regulations relating to the
use of agents as petitioners for H-2B temporary workers. The current
regulation at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(F) allows U.S. agents to file
petitions in cases involving workers who are traditionally self-
employed or who use agents to arrange short-term employment with
numerous employers, or in the case of foreign employers. In addition,
the current regulations at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(F) and (h)(6)(iii)(B)
permit foreign employers to use U.S. agents to petition for H-2B
temporary workers. This rule proposes to no longer allow the filing of
H-2B petitions by agents.
This change is necessary in light of the transition from a labor-
certification to an attestation-based petition process for most H-2B
petitioning employers. In order to ensure the integrity of the H-2B
attestation process, H-2B attestations must be made by the employer,
not by a recruiting agent. In addition, DHS believes that it will be
easier for USCIS to take action against an employing petitioner, who is
making the attestations required under the DOL regulations at 20 CFR
655, subpart A, than against an agent. DHS notes that this is not
restricting the use of agents to recruit workers but is instead
requiring only that the employer directly petition for the H-2B
temporary worker.
Eighth, this rule proposes to codify the current numerical counting
procedures for the H-2B classification. Title 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(ii)(A)
already provides that requests for petition extension or extension of
an H-2B alien's stay shall not count against the numerical cap. DHS is
amending 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(ii) by adding a new paragraph (G) to reflect
that, for purposes of the H-2B numerical cap, USCIS will not count
amendments to previously approved petitions or petitions for aliens who
already hold H-2B status and are seeking to change employers or add a
new or additional employer (e.g., concurrent employment). An amended H-
2B petition is required in instances where there has been a material
change in the terms and conditions of employment or the alien's
eligibility for the classification (e.g., a material change in the
duties performed by the alien). See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(E). USCIS is
also further amending 8 CFR 214.2 by adding a new paragraph
(h)(8)(ii)(H) to state that an H-2B nonimmigrant who is employed (or
has received an offer of employment) as a fish roe processor, a fish
roe technician, or a supervisor of fish roe processing, shall not be
subject to the numerical limitation in a given fiscal year. USCIS is
adding new paragraph (h)(8)(ii)(H) to comport with section 14006 of the
2005 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. L. 108-287,
August 5, 2004).
Ninth, DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iii) to require
that employers seeking a certain number of aliens to fill H-2B
positions only specify the number of positions sought and not name the
individual alien on all initial H-2B petitions (i.e., unnamed
beneficiaries), unless the beneficiary already is in the United States.
DHS is requiring beneficiaries who are already in the United States to
be named, as USCIS is responsible for adjudication of the beneficiary's
eligibility for H-2B status in such instances. USCIS will require a
named beneficiary in all petitions where USCIS is responsible for
adjudication of the beneficiary's eligibility for H-2B status.
DHS is soliciting comments from the public on whether USCIS should
require all H-2B beneficiaries to be named, as such a requirement would
assist DHS in maintaining an accurate count of the number of aliens
granted H-2B visas or accorded H-2B status each fiscal year.
The beneficiary of a Form I-129 who was previously in H-2B status
for a maximum 3-year period is eligible for a subsequent maximum
authorized period of admission (up to one year initially with possible
extensions up to 3 years) only if the alien has been outside the United
States for a period of 6 months prior to filing of the petition.
Tenth, this rule proposes to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(B) to
reflect that an H-2B petition, if submitted via e-filing, may not be
filed more than 60 days prior to the date of actual need for the
beneficiary's services. DOL is concurrently proposing regulations
stating that recruitment must occur within 60 days of filing. To ensure
accuracy of the labor market test, DHS is proposing to also limit
advance filings of H-2B petitions to a maximum period of 60 days. In
light of the new streamlined procedures proposed in the DOL and DHS
companion rules, DHS is confident that 60 days is a sufficient amount
of time to process the H-2B petition and enable the beneficiary to
obtain a visa or be accorded H-2B status. DHS solicits comments from
the public regarding this change.
Finally, in the event that an employer has submitted an application
for change of status, an extension of status, or a petition that
requests named beneficiaries and the security check
[[Page 3987]]
generates adverse information on a beneficiary who is part of a
multiple-beneficiary petition, DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR
214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) to create a process that will allow for issuance of a
partial approval notice to allow the petitioning employer to receive
authorization to employ the remainder of the requested H-2B workers.
USCIS will continue to process the petitions of the remaining workers
to completion.
Is DOL Proposing any Changes to the Temporary Labor Certification
Process?
Yes. DOL will propose in a separate rulemaking to terminate the
existing labor certification process for most H-2B employment, with
certain exceptions. These exceptions are employers seeking H-2B workers
in logging, the entertainment industry, and professional athletics. DOL
has traditionally applied a unique process for workers who fall within
these well-defined exceptions and DOL does not intend to modify these
unique processes at this time. For all other H-2B employment, instead
of the current labor certification process, elements of the H-2B labor
certification will be incorporated into an attestation that will be
made to the U.S. Government in accordance with DOL regulations. The
attestation will be filed electronically, through e-filing, with the
Form I-129 petition because the attestation will be contained in the
Form I-129 H supplement. Employers will not be required to submit a
separate form, as previously required with the labor certification.
Employers who may continue to file paper petitions are those in the
logging, entertainment, and professional athletics industries, as well
as those H-2B employers in Guam. These employers are encouraged to
utilize e-filing when submitting Form I-129 petitions, although these
employers will still be required to submit the appropriate ``paper''
temporary labor certification to the service center with jurisdiction
over the area of intended employment. DOL will also propose in a
separate rulemaking an audit and debarment process for employers who
are found not to have complied with the required elements of the
attestation.
What Is the Proposed Attestation Process?
The attestation process for the H-2B classification will be similar
to the process currently used for the H-1B nonimmigrant classification.
However, the H-2B attestation will be submitted to USCIS through e-
filing. The attestation will be contained in the Form I-129 H
supplement and most employers will not be required to submit a separate
form, as previously required with the labor certification. The terms of
the attestation are set forth at 20 CFR 655 subpart A. Given that the
Form I-129 H supplement is currently required to be submitted with the
I-129 petition, DHS is proposing that Form I-129 (including the H
supplement that contains the required attestations) be submitted to
USCIS through e-filing. This process will ensure that all required
elements of the attestation are completed before USCIS adjudicates the
petition. In cases where an employer is still required to submit a
labor certification (i.e., for employment in Guam and for other
employment as designated by DOL in its regulations), the paper labor
certification must be submitted to the appropriate USCIS service center
regardless of whether the petition was e-filed or not.
What Will Be the Required Elements of the Attestation?
The elements of the attestation must meet the DOL requirements set
forth at 20 CFR 655, subpart A. If the attestation is complete, and the
H-2B petition is otherwise approvable, the H-2B petition may be
approved for the length of time specified by the petitioner or
determined by USCIS as meeting the petitioner's temporary need, a
period that may last for up to one year. Approval of the H-2B petition
will constitute evidence that the attestation (included in the Form I-
129 H Supplement) also has been accepted and relied upon for purposes
of supporting the Form I-129 petition. The validity of the petition and
the beneficiary's authorized period of stay may be extended in
increments of up to one year, for a maximum period of 3 years, but may
not be extended for any time beyond the 3-year period. An employer must
submit a new Form I-129 H supplement (which includes the attestation)
with each new Form I-129 petition.
Will the Changes to the Temporary Labor Certification Process Cover All
H-2B Employment?
No. First, it should be noted that DOL has no jurisdiction over
Guam with respect to labor certification; therefore the Governor of
Guam will retain his authority to issue labor certifications without
modification. It has not been demonstrated to DHS that the employment
situation in Guam requires DHS to modify the current labor
certification provisions for prospective employers in Guam. In
addition, the new attestation process will be required only for those
employers designated by DOL at 20 CFR 655.3. Employers in the logging,
entertainment, and professional athletics industries are not required
to submit an attestation, but must submit a paper labor certification
to the USCIS service center with jurisdiction over the area of intended
employment.
What Is the Period of Petition Validity?
The USCIS service center director may approve an H-2B petition for
the length of time specified by the petitioner or determined by USCIS
as meeting the petitioner's need, which in certain instances may last
for up to one year. The period of validity of the petition and the
beneficiary's authorized period of stay may be extended for additional
periods of time, as determined by USCIS based on the specific
circumstances of the employer, but the petitioner may not be authorized
to employ the beneficiary beyond the beneficiary's maximum period of
authorized stay (up to one year initially with possible extensions up
to 3 years). An employer must submit a new Form I-129 H supplement
(which includes the attestation) in order to extend the period of
validity of a petition and to obtain an extension of stay for the
beneficiary. For petitions filed for employment in Guam, or for
petitions requiring labor certification, the maximum period of
admission will remain one year and extensions of stay may be granted
for an individual worker, in increments of one year, for a maximum
period of 3 years.
How Will USCIS Process Petitions With Multiple Named Beneficiaries When
One of the Beneficiaries Takes Longer Than the Others or a Security
Check Uncovers Adverse Information About One of the Beneficiaries?
DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) to create a
process that will allow for issuance of a partial approval notice in
the event that an employer has requested named beneficiaries (for
beneficiaries who already are in the United States) and a mandatory
security check on one or more of the requested beneficiaries takes
longer than the others or a security check uncovers adverse information
about one of the beneficiaries.
Accordingly, DHS is proposing to amend 8 CFR 214.2(h)(9)(i)(A) so
that, in the event a security check takes more time for one or more
beneficiaries on a multiple-beneficiary petition, or a security check
uncovers adverse information about one of the beneficiaries, USCIS may
issue a partial approval notice to the petitioner that will name which
beneficiaries are authorized for H-2B status and
[[Page 3988]]
employment, but exclude the name of the beneficiary whose law
enforcement checks remain pending. This process will allow USCIS to
process H-2B petitions more efficiently for the majority of
beneficiaries.
Will an Employer Be Permitted To Substitute the Names of Beneficiaries
on a Petition Before USCIS Issues a Partial Approval Notice?
No. In order to ensure that petitions are processed as
expeditiously as possible, USCIS will make every attempt to issue a
partial approval notice without prior notification or contact with the
petitioning employer. The proposal to expedite processing in this
manner will not allow a petitioning employer to substitute
beneficiaries on a pending petition.
Will an Employer Still Be Permitted To Substitute Beneficiaries on a
Petition After USCIS Partial Approval but Prior to an Alien's Admission
to the United States?
Yes. This process does not require amendments to the current
substitution process at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iv), which allow for
substitution of beneficiaries on an approved petition, if an employer
requests named beneficiaries.
Will an Employer Be Permitted To Substitute Beneficiaries Who Are
Already in the United States in H-2B Status Into a Previously Approved
Petition?
No. DHS is concerned that such a substitution would undermine other
proposals in the rule that are intended to strengthen employer
reporting requirements. If an employer were allowed to make post-
admission substitutions without notification to USCIS, it would limit
the ability of USCIS to maintain accurate information concerning the
whereabouts and activities of nonimmigrants under the H-2B category. In
addition, such substitution would circumvent the required background
checks that are currently run on individuals at the time of visa
issuance and at the time of admission. Therefore, DHS is amending
language at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(D) and 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(iii) to
clarify that an employer will only be permitted to hire H-2B
nonimmigrants who are within the United States if the employer files a
new H-2B petition naming the beneficiary or beneficiaries.
How Will DHS and DOL Monitor and Ensure the Integrity of the H-2B
Program?
DHS and DOL (through separate rulemaking) are proposing several
amendments that will allow both departments to monitor and ensure the
integrity of the H-2B program, including DOL random and selected audits
of H-2B petitions, and debarment of employers who have made willful
misrepresentations in the H-2B petition or failed to comply with the
attestation requirements as required by DOL regulations.
DHS is proposing to amend the regulations at 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii)(B) to require that all United States employers
petition directly for the H-2B beneficiary. This amendment will
preclude United States agents and/or recruiters acting as agents from
filing on behalf of United States employers. DHS is proposing to amend
8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(D) to ensure that USCIS processes are
coordinated with the results of random and selected audits of
attestations that the Secretary of Labor will conduct pursuant to
regulations to be issued by DOL. Also, if USCIS determines that an
employer has failed to comply with an attestation, USCIS may deny the
petition pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(10) or initiate revocation
proceedings pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(11).
In addition, DHS notes that there are other laws that protect U.S.
workers such as the Fair Labor Standards Act and section 274A of the
Act, respectively, as well as anti-discrimination statutes.
DOL, through separate rulemaking at 20 CFR part 655, subpart A,
will propose to conduct random and selected audits of attestations that
have been submitted with the Form I-129 petition to determine whether
the information provided by the employer is accurate and is in
compliance with the relevant regulations.
DHS is proposing to add a new paragraph (h)(20) to establish a
process whereby USCIS will deny all petitions (immigrant and
nonimmigrant) filed by an employer for a specified period of time,
based upon a finding by DOL that an employer has not complied with
attestation conditions (this is known as debarment). In a separate
rulemaking, at 20 CFR 655.13, DOL is proposing an audit and debarment
process for employers who are found not to have complied with the
required elements of the H-2B attestation. If DOL determines that an
employer violated the conditions of the attestation and recommends the
employer be debarred from filing future attestations for a specified
period of time, upon notice from DOL, USCIS will accept DOL's
recommendation and debar the petitioner from filing all petitions under
new paragraph (h)(20). This process is similar to the H-1B debarment
process under section 212(n)(2)(C) of the Act. The proposed regulation
provides that DOL will recommend, through its hearing procedures, a
period of debarment based on the severity of the violation when it
notifies USCIS that a violation has occurred. USCIS will accord
considerable weight to this recommendation when it determines the
appropriate period of debarment for the employer. The period of
debarment imposed by USCIS will be at least the minimum period
recommended by DOL, but USCIS may choose to impose a longer period of
debarment.
As mentioned previously, USCIS is also proposing to establish a
self-initiated debarment process separate from the DOL audit and
debarment process. DHS solicits comments on the administrative process
and penalties associated with this debarment process, including the
appellate process.
DHS also is considering establishing administrative penalties for
program abusers such as requiring recruitment reports with labor
attestations. DHS welcomes comments and suggestions on whether DHS
should establish administrative penalties and, if so, the type of
administrative penalties that should be imposed on non-compliant H-2B
employers.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DHS has reviewed this regulation in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), and, by approving it, certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Although this rule may affect small entities,
it is intended to help employers by eliminating certain regulatory
barriers in hiring H-2B workers. This rule removes the burdensome labor
certification process and replaces it with a simpler attestation
process for H-2B workers that will facilitate processing within the H-
2B program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one-year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
[[Page 3989]]
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
based companies in domestic and export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is considered by DHS to be a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning
and Review. Accordingly, this regulation has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
DHS has considered both the costs and the benefits of this rule as
required in Executive Order 12866 section (b)(6) and has determined
that the benefits of this regulation outweigh any costs. That
determination is as follows: This proposal is necessary to improve U.S.
employers' use of the H-2B program and access to necessary workers in a
timely fashion. The current H-2B program requires a U.S. employer to
submit to a two-step process, involving two separate agencies, before
it can obtain a foreign worker. Petitioning employers must first file a
labor certification application with DOL and DOL must approve the labor
certification before the employer may file a petition with USCIS for
approval based on the labor certification. The processing time and
inherent delays associated with this two-step process negatively impact
U.S. employers' ability to achieve optimal staffing levels in the time
needed to meet their needs. In addition to time delays, the two-step
process imposes additional costs in the form of paperwork and
correspondence with two agencies.
By including the attestation in the Form I-129 H supplement, DHS
has created a one-step process where certain U.S. employers seeking H-
2B temporary workers now only will be required to file one application
package--the Form I-129 with the Form I-129 H supplement--with one
agency, DHS. This one-step process benefits employers by reducing costs
and delays associated with separate USCIS petition adjudication and DOL
labor certification processes, thereby allowing the employer to be
matched with a qualified H-2B worker in a more timely fashion. The one-
step process also alleviates processing costs to the agencies due to
separate filing requirements. Finally, these changes enhance the
effectiveness of the H-2B program while maintaining integrity through
enforcement by DOL and DHS with debarment processes for non-compliant
H-2B employers. In addition to consolidating the filing process, this
rule would make the actual submission of the necessary information
itself easier (for eligible employers) by incorporating the required
attestations into the Form I-129 H Supplement and permitting
petitioning employers to file the required Form I-129 petition
(including the H supplement) electronically, through e-filing.
In addition, because this rule proposes to cease requiring named
beneficiaries for workers not in the United States, within the context
of USCIS processing, this rule will further alleviate processing delays
that result when USCIS performs background checks on each named H-2B
beneficiary. DOS currently performs background checks on all
beneficiaries before visa issuance, so this process retains all
requisite security measures while eliminating duplication of work
between USCIS and DOS.
There are no new costs to the public associated with this rule. No
new or additional requirements are being created by this rule. Though
the revisions to the Form I-129 H Supplement to include attestations as
required under DOL regulations (20 CFR part 655, subpart A), are
considered a new information collection under the Paperwork Reduction
Act, these revisions will not create any additional burden on
petitioning U.S. employers. In fact, the revisions reduce the current
paperwork burden for such employers by removing the requirement that
certain U.S. employers seeking an H-2B temporary work comply with a
two-step filing process to obtain temporary labor in this visa
category.
Executive Order 13132
The rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Employers are currently required to file a Form I-129 with the H
supplement when petitioning for H-2B workers. This proposed rule
revises the current H supplement to require petitioners to attest to
certain information on the H Supplement when petitioning USCIS for H-2B
workers. This attestation is made to the U.S. Government in accordance
with DOL regulations, and is provided to USCIS as a part of the H
Supplement with the Form I-129 petition filing in order to streamline
processing. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, OMB considers
the attestation an information collection requirement subject to
review. Accordingly, this information collection has been submitted to
OMB for review. Written comments are encouraged and will be accepted
until March 28, 2005. When submitting comments on the information
collection, your comments should address one or more of the following
four points.
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of the information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of any and all
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of information collection: Revision.
(2) Title of Form/Collection: H Supplement to USCIS Form I-129,
Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security sponsoring the collection: H Supplement
to USCIS Form I-129, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
[[Page 3990]]
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Individuals. The H Supplement to Form I-129
is required evidence for an employer petitioning for an alien to come
to the U.S. temporarily to perform services or labor as an H-1B, H-2A,
H-2B or H-3 nonimmigrant worker.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: 368,948
inclusive of all I-129 filings at 2.75 hours per response.
(6) An estimate of the total of public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: Approximately 1,014,607 burden hours inclusive of
all I-129 filings.
All comments and suggestions or questions regarding additional
information should be directed to the Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Regulatory Management
Division, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529;
Attention: Richard A. Sloan, Director, 202-514-3291.
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 214
Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Employment, Foreign
officials, Health professions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Students.
Accordingly, part 214 of chapter I of title 8 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 214--NONIMMIGRANT CLASSES
1. The authority citation for part 214 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1102, 1103, 1182, 1184, 1185 (pursuant
to Executive Order 13323, published January 2, 2004), 1186a, 1187,
1221, 1281, 1282, 1301-1305; 1372; 1379; 1731-32; sec. 14006, Pub.
L. 108-287; sec. 643, Pub. L. 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-708; section
141 of the Compacts of Free Association with the Federated States of
Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and with the
Government of Palau, 48 U.S.C. 1901, note, and 1931, note,
respectively.
2. Section 214.2 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(D);
b. Revising paragraphs (h)(2)(i)(A), (C), and (D);
c. Revising the term ``A United States agent'' to read: ``Except in
the case of a petition for an H-2B worker, a United States agent'' at
the beginning of paragraph (h)(2)(i)(F), introductory text;
d. Revising paragraphs (h)(2)(ii) and (iii);
e. Revising paragraphs (h)(6)(iii)(A), (B), (C), (D) and (E);
f. Adding new paragraphs (h)(6)(iii)(F) and (G);
g. Revising paragraph (h)(6)(iv);
h. Revising paragraphs (h)(6)(vi)(A), (B), (C) and (D);
i. Adding new paragraphs (h)(8)(ii)(G) and (H);
j. Revising paragraphs (h)(9)(i)(A) and (B), (h)(9)(iii)(B)(1) and
(h)(9)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii);
k. Adding introductory text to paragraph (h)(11)(i);
l. Revising paragraphs (h)(11)(i)(A) and (h)(11)(iii)(A)(2);
m. Revising paragraph (h)(13)(iv);
n. Revising paragraph (h)(15)(ii)(C);
o. Redesignating paragraph (h)(15)(ii)(D) as (h)(15)(ii)(E) and by
adding a new paragraph (h)(15)(ii)(D); and by
p. Adding a new paragraph (h)(20).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 214.2 Special requirements for admission, extension, and
maintenance of status.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) An H-2B classification applies to an alien who is coming
temporarily to the United States to perform nonagricultural work of a
temporary or seasonal nature, if unemployed persons capable of
performing such service or labor cannot be found in this country. This
classification does not apply to graduates of medical schools coming to
the United States to perform services as members of the medical
profession. The temporary or permanent nature of the services or labor
to be performed shall be determined by the USCIS. This classification
also requires a labor certification or attestation, as prescribed by
the Department of Labor at 20 CFR 655.3.
* * * * *
(2) Petitions--(i) Filing of petitions--(A) General. A United
States employer seeking to classify an alien as an H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, or
H-3 temporary employee shall file a petition on Form I-129, Petition
for Nonimmigrant Worker with the Form I-129 H supplement, only with the
service center which has jurisdiction in the area where the alien will
perform services, or receive training, even in emergent situations,
except as provided in this paragraph. With the exception of employers
seeking H-2B workers in logging, the entertainment industry, and
professional athletics, a United States employer seeking to classify an
alien as an H-2B temporary employee shall file electronically, through
e-filing, the Form I-129 petition with H Supplement as provided in 8
CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii)(C). For U.S. employers seeking H-2B temporary
workers in logging, the entertainment industry, and professional
athletics, the U.S. employer may e-file the Form I-129, or file the
paper Form I-129 with the required temporary labor certification to the
USCIS service center that has jurisdiction over the area where the
alien will perform services. Regardless of which filing option U.S.
employers in logging, the entertainment industry, and professional
athletics choose, such employers will still be required to submit a
paper temporary labor certification to the USCIS service center with
jurisdiction over the area of intended employment. A United States
employer seeking to classify an alien as an H-1C nonimmigrant
registered nurse shall file a petition on Form I-129 at the Vermont
Service Center. Petitions in Guam and the Virgin Islands, and petitions
involving special filing situations as determined by USCIS
Headquarters, shall be filed with the local USCIS office or a
designated USCIS office. The petitioner may submit a legible photocopy
of a document in support of the visa petition in lieu of the original
document. However, the original document shall be submitted if
requested by the USCIS.
* * * * *
(C) Services or training for more than one employer. If the
beneficiary will perform nonagricultural services for, or receive
training from more than one United States employer, each employer must
file a separate petition, the Form I-129 with H Supplement, and, if
required, a labor certification with the service center that has
jurisdiction over the area where the alien will perform services or
receive training.
(D) Change of employers. If the alien is in the United States and
seeks to change employers, the prospective new employer (except in the
case of H-2As), must file a petition on Form I-129, with the fee
required in 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1) and, if required, with a labor
certification, naming the beneficiary, and requesting classification
and extension of the alien's stay in the United States. A prospective
new employer may not substitute an alien who is within the United
States into any previously approved petition. If the new petition is
approved, the extension of stay may be granted for the validity of the
approved petition. The validity of the petition and the alien's
extension of stay must conform to the limits on the alien's temporary
stay that are prescribed in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(13). The
[[Page 3991]]
alien is not authorized to begin the employment with the new petitioner
until the petition is approved.
* * * * *
(ii) Multiple beneficiaries. More than one beneficiary may be
included in an H-1C, H-2A, H-2B, or H-3 petition, and a labor
certification or attestation for H-2B petitions, if the beneficiaries
will be performing the same service, or receiving the same training,
for the same period of time, and in the same location.
(iii) Named beneficiaries. An H-2B petition shall not include the
name(s) of the beneficiary(ies) at the time of filing, unless the
beneficiary is within the United States. For employment that requires
labor certification, if all of the beneficiaries covered by an H-2B
labor certification have not been identified at the time a petition is
filed, multiple petitions may be filed at different times with a copy
of the same labor certification; however, each petition must have been
filed within 90 days of certification. Each petition must reference all
previously filed petitions for that labor certification. For H-2B
employment that requires an attestation, a U.S. employer must file a
new Form I-129 H Supplement with each petition filed on behalf of name
beneficiaries. The Form I-129 H Supplement must reflect the same number
of beneficiaries that are being requested on the H-2B petition. An
initial H-2A petition may contain both named and unnamed beneficiaries
and the total number of beneficiaries must agree with the number of
positions on the labor certification request. The number stated on the
labor certification or Form I-129 H Supplement does not need to agree
with the number of aliens requested on a subsequent request for
extension.
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) With the exceptions of employment for which the Department of
Labor provides labor certification, when filing a petition with the
director to classify an alien as an H-2B worker, the petitioner shall
submit an H Supplement, that includes an attestation that complies with
20 CFR part 655, subpart A, for each United States metropolitan
statistical area in which a beneficiary will be employed. In the
territory of Guam, the petitioning employer shall apply for temporary
labor certification with the Governor of Guam. For other employment for
which the Department of Labor requires labor certification, the
petitioning employer shall apply for temporary labor certification with
the Secretary of Labor. The labor certification or Form I-129 H
Supplement shall be considered sufficient evidence that no United
States workers capable of performing the temporary services or labor
are available and that the alien's employment will not adversely affect
the wages and working conditions of similarly employed United States
workers.
(B) An H-2B petition may only be filed by the employer seeking to
hire an individual as an H-2B temporary worker. An agent may not file
an H-2B petition on behalf of any employer. The petitioning employer
shall consider available United States workers for the temporary
services or labor, and shall offer terms and conditions of employment
which are consistent with the nature of the occupation, activity, and
industry in the United States.
(C) The petitioner may not file an H-2B petition unless the United
States petitioner has submitted a Form I-129 H Supplement or otherwise
has applied for and received the appropriate labor certification as
prescribed by the Department of Labor at 20 CFR 655.3. H-2B petitions
must be filed electronically with the Form I-129 and H supplement
through e-filing at the appropriate DHS website, unless the application
requires a DOL temporary labor certification. A new H supplement must
be filed with each Form I-129 petition and must reflect the same number
of workers requested on the Form I-129 petition. All applications for
labor certification or I-129 H supplements must be filed within the
time limits prescribed or accepted by each category.
(D) The Governor of Guam shall separately establish procedures for
providing temporary labor certifications. Furthermore, the Secretary of
Labor shall separately establish procedures for providing temporary
labor certifications for employers seeking H-2B workers in logging, the
entertainment industry, and professional athletics. The Secretary of
Labor may implement a program to conduct random and selected audits to
ensure the integrity of the attestation portion of the I-129 H
supplement and to ensure compliance with the relevant regulatory
provisions.
(E) For petitions that require a labor certification from the
Governor of Guam for employment in Guam or from the Secretary of Labor
for other employment, as prescribed by the Department of Labor at 20
CFR 655.3, the petitioner may file a paper Form I-129 with the required
paper labor certification to the appropriate USCIS service center with
jurisdiction over the area where the alien will perform services.
(F) The certification from the Governor of Guam or the Secretary of
Labor is advisory in nature and does not establish the temporary nature
of the position or the beneficiary's eligibility. The service center
director may deny the H-2B petition, pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(10) if
the director determines that the statements on the Form I-129 petition
were inaccurate, fraudulent, or misrepresented a material fact.
(G) The service center director may institute revocation
proceedings as described in paragraph (h)(11) of this section if the
director determines that the statements on the Form I-129 petition were
inaccurate, fraudulent, or misrepresented a material fact.
(iv) Labor certifications for H-2B employment--(A) Labor
certifications. For H-2B employment requiring a labor certification, an
H-2B petition for temporary employment shall be accompanied by:
(1) A certification from the Secretary of Labor stating that
qualified workers in the United States are not available and that the
alien's employment will not adversely affect wages and working
conditions of similarly employed United States workers; or
(2) A notice stating the reasons why such certification cannot be
made. Such notice shall address the availability of United States
workers in the occupation and the prevailing wages and working
conditions of United States workers in the occupation.
(B) Attachment to a petition requiring labor certification. If the
petitioner receives a notice from the Secretary of Labor that
certification cannot be made, a petition containing countervailing
evidence must be filed with the service center director. The evidence
must show that qualified workers in the United States are not
available, and that the terms and conditions of employment are
consistent with the nature of the occupation, activity, and industry in
the United States. All such evidence submitted shall be considered in
adjudicating the petition. The countervailing evidence presented by the
petitioner shall be in writing and shall address availability of United
States workers, the prevailing wage rate for the occupation in the
United States, and each of the reasons why the Secretary of Labor could
not grant a labor certification. The petitioner may also submit other
appropriate information in support of the petition. The director, at
his or her discretion, may require additional supporting evidence.
(C) U.S. Virgin Islands. Labor certifications filed under section
101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Act for
[[Page 3992]]
employment in the United States Virgin Islands may be approved only for
entertainers and athletes and only for periods not to exceed 45 days.
(D) Validity period for labor certifications. The Secretary of
Labor may issue a temporary labor certification for a period up to one
year.
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) Labor certification or notice. A temporary labor certification
or a notice that certification cannot be made issued by the Governor of
Guam in the case of employment in Guam; a temporary labor certification
or notice that certification cannot be made issued by the Secretary of
Labor in the case of employment for which labor certification is
required;
(B) Countervailing evidence. Evidence to rebut the Governor of
Guam's or, in the case of employment for which the Department of Labor
requires labor certification, the Secretary of Labor's notice that
certification cannot be made;
(C) Alien's qualifications. Documentation that the alien qualifies
for the job offer as specified in the application for labor
certification or petition (including the H supplement), except in
petitions where the labor certification or petition (including the H
supplement) requires no education, training, experience, or special
requirements of the beneficiary; and
(D) Statement of need. A statement describing in detail the
temporary situation or conditions which make it necessary to bring the
alien to the United States and whether the need is a one-time
occurrence, seasonal, peakload, or intermittent and lasting less than
one year. If the need is seasonal, peakload, or intermittent, the
statement shall indicate whether the situation or conditions are
expected to be recurrent. The statement shall be made on the Form I-129
H supplement, which must be filed concurrently with the H-2B petition.
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) USCIS will not count towards the numerical limitation in a
given fiscal year petitions requesting extensions of H-2B status,
amendments to previously approved H-2B petitions, or petitions for
aliens who already hold H-2B status and are seeking to change employers
or add an additional employer (i.e. concurrent employment).
(H) The numerical limitation in a given fiscal year shall not apply
to an H-2B nonimmigrant who is employed (or has received an offer of
employment) as a fish roe processor, a fish roe technician, or a
supervisor of fish roe processing.
(9) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) If a petitioner has requested named beneficiaries because the
beneficiaries are within the United States, the approval notice shall
include the name of each beneficiary approved for that classification.
Further, all approval notices shall include the requested
classification and the petition's period of validity. A petition for
more than one beneficiary and/or multiple services may be approved in
whole or in part. In the event that a security check for one of the
requested beneficiaries takes more time than is required for the other
beneficiaries on a multiple-beneficiary petition, USCIS may issue a
partial approval notice without notifying the petitioner of the
specific information relating to the beneficiary(ies) not included on
the approval notice. The approval notice shall identify only those
beneficiaries approved for classification under section 101(a)(15)(H)
of the Act.
(B) An H-2B petition, if submitted via e-filing, may not be filed
more than 60 days prior to the date of actual need for the
beneficiary's services.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) * * *
(1)(i) General. Except as provided in paragraph
(h)(9)(iii)(B)(1)(ii) of this section, the approval of a petition to
accord an alien a classification under section 101(a)(15)(ii)(b) of the
Act shall be valid for the length of time as determined by the USCIS as
meeting the petitioner's need, not to exceed a period of up to one
year.
(ii) Labor certification attached. If a certification by the
Governor of Guam or the Secretary of Labor is attached to a petition to
accord an alien a classification under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of
the Act, the approval of the petition may be valid for a period of up
to one year.
(2) * * *
(i) Countervailing evidence. If a petition is submitted containing
a notice from the Governor of Guam that certification cannot be made,
and is not accompanied by countervailing evidence, the petitioner shall
be informed that he or she may submit the countervailing evidence in
accordance with paragraph (h)(6)(iii)(E) of this section.
(ii) Approval. In any case where the service center director
decides that approval of the H-2B petition is warranted despite the
issuance of a notice by the Governor of Guam that certification cannot
be made, the approval shall be certified by the service center director
to the Director, Administrative Appeals Office, pursuant to 8 CFR
103.4. In emergent situations, the certification may be presented by
telephone to the Director, Administrative Appeals Office, Headquarters.
If approved, the petition is valid for the period of established need
not to exceed one year. There is no appeal from a decision that has
been certified to the Director, Administrative Appeals Office.
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(i) General. The service center director may revoke a petition at
any time, even after the expiration of the approval of the petition.
(A) The petitioner shal