Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization, 3688 [E5-302]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
3688
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Notices
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to Robert T.
Tomlinson, Director, Regulatory Affairs,
Colorado Interstate Company, P.O. Box
1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944
at (719) 520–3788 or by fax at (719) 667–
7534 or Craig V. Richardson, Vice
President and General Counsel,
Colorado Interstate Company, P.O. Box
1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944
at (719) 520–4929 or by fax at (719) 520–
4898.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A
person obtaining party status will be
placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and
will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies
of filings made with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project, or in support of or in opposition
to this project, should submit an
original and two copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental
commenters will be placed on the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the
Commission’s environmental review
process. Environmental commenters
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commenters will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:33 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
January 18, 2005.
Take notice that on January 5, 2005,
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company
(Columbia Gulf), 2603 Augusta,
Houston, Texas 77057–5637, filed in
Docket No. CP05–44–000, an
application pursuant to pursuant to
Sections 157.205, 157.208, and 157.216
of the Commission’s Regulations under
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission), for authorization to
replace 9.39 miles of its 30- and 36-inch
pipeline designated as Mainlines 100,
200, and 300, located in Williamson and
Davidson counties, Tennessee, due to a
Department of Transportation (DOT)
class location change of the pipeline.
Columbia Gulf states that as a result of
recent population density surveys
required by DOT, it has determined that
in order to maintain the current
maximum operating pressure of the
pipeline, the existing pipeline must be
replaced by a heavier walled pipeline.
Columbia Gulf also seeks approval to
abandon by removal an equivalent
length of existing like sized
transmission pipeline and
appurtenances of its Mainlines 100, 200,
and 300, which is being replaced. The
pipeline will be replaced with an
approximate like amount and a like size
pipeline. The construction is proposed
to take place within an existing right-ofway, is estimated to cost $15.6-million,
and will involve a typical lift and lay
procedure, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public
inspection.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to counsel
for Columbia Gulf, Frederic J. George,
Senior Attorney, Columbia Gas
Transmission Corporation, PO Box
1273, Charleston West Virginia 25325–
1273; telephone 304–357–2359, fax
304–357–3206.
This filing is available for review at
the Commission or may be viewed on
the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free at (866) 206–3676, or, for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659. Comments,
protests and interventions may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link. The Commission strongly
encourages intervenors to file
electronically.
Any person or the Commission’s staff
may, within 45 days after issuance of
the instant notice by the Commission,
file pursuant to Rule 214 of the
Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice
of intervention and pursuant to Section
157.205 of the Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a
protest to the request. If no protest is
filed within the time allowed therefor,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to
be authorized effective the day after the
time allowed for filing a protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn
within 30 days after the time allowed
for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the Natural Gas Act.
Comment Date: March 7, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–302 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: March 7, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–299 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP05–44–000]
Columbia Gulf Transmission
Company; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL05–54–000]
La Paloma Generating Company, LLC,
Complainant v. California Independent
System Operator Corporation,
Respondent; Notice of Complaint Fast
Track
January 13, 2005.
Take notice that on January 11, 2005,
La Paloma Generating Company, LLC
(La Paloma) filed a complaint against
the California Independent System
Operator Corporation (CAISO) pursuant
to section 206 of the Federal Power Act,
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 3688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-302]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP05-44-000]
Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization
January 18, 2005.
Take notice that on January 5, 2005, Columbia Gulf Transmission
Company (Columbia Gulf), 2603 Augusta, Houston, Texas 77057-5637, filed
in Docket No. CP05-44-000, an application pursuant to pursuant to
Sections 157.205, 157.208, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations
under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission), for authorization to replace 9.39 miles of its
30- and 36-inch pipeline designated as Mainlines 100, 200, and 300,
located in Williamson and Davidson counties, Tennessee, due to a
Department of Transportation (DOT) class location change of the
pipeline. Columbia Gulf states that as a result of recent population
density surveys required by DOT, it has determined that in order to
maintain the current maximum operating pressure of the pipeline, the
existing pipeline must be replaced by a heavier walled pipeline.
Columbia Gulf also seeks approval to abandon by removal an equivalent
length of existing like sized transmission pipeline and appurtenances
of its Mainlines 100, 200, and 300, which is being replaced. The
pipeline will be replaced with an approximate like amount and a like
size pipeline. The construction is proposed to take place within an
existing right-of-way, is estimated to cost $15.6-million, and will
involve a typical lift and lay procedure, all as more fully set forth
in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection.
Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
counsel for Columbia Gulf, Frederic J. George, Senior Attorney,
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, PO Box 1273, Charleston West
Virginia 25325-1273; telephone 304-357-2359, fax 304-357-3206.
This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call toll-free at (866) 206-3676, or, for
TTY, contact (202) 502-8659. Comments, protests and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
intervenors to file electronically.
Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Comment Date: March 7, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-302 Filed 1-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
