TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Revisions, 3658-3666 [05-1380]
Download as PDF
3658
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
subscriber per month for viewing
distant superstations in commercial
establishments adjusted for the amount
of inflation as measured by the change
in the Consumer Price Index for all
Urban Consumers from January 2008 to
January 2009.
Dated: January 21, 2005
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 05–1435 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–33–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R04–OAR–2004–SC–0002/0003–200421(b);
FRL–7863–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans South Carolina:
Definitions and General Requirements
For
additional information see the direct
final rule which is published in the
Rules section of this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
approve the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions submitted by the South
Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SC DHEC) on
November 14, 2003, for the purpose of
clarifying current regulations and
ensuring consistency between State and
Federal regulations. The proposed
revisions consist of those published in
the South Carolina State Register on
August 28, 1998 and June 25, 1999,
revising Regulation 61–62.1 Definitions
and General Requirements. In the Final
Rules section of this Federal Register,
the EPA is approving the State’s SIP
revision as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no significant, material, and
adverse comments are received in
response to this rule, no further activity
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this rule.
The EPA will not institute a second
comment period on this document. Any
parties interested in commenting on this
document should do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by mail to: Nacosta C. Ward,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically, or through hand
delivery/courier. Please follow the
detailed instructions described in the
direct final rule, ADDRESSES section
which is published in the Rules section
of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9140.
Ms. Ward can also be reached via
electronic mail at
ward.nacosta@epa.gov.
Dated: January 7, 2005.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 05–1373 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 710
[OPPT–2004–0106; FRL–7332–2]
RIN 2070–AC61
TSCA Inventory Update Reporting
Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing
amendments to the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a)
Inventory Update Reporting (IUR)
regulations. The IUR currently requires
certain manufacturers (including
importers) of certain chemical
substances on the TSCA Chemical
Substances Inventory to report data on
chemical manufacturing, processing,
and use every 4 years. EPA is proposing
to extend the reporting cycle, modify
the timing of the submission period,
further clarify the new partial
exemption for specific chemicals of low
current interest, amend the petroleum
refinery process streams partial
exemption, amend the list of consumer
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and commercial product categories,
revise the manner in which production
volume would be reported, restrict
reporting of processing and use
information to domestic processing and
use activities only, edit the polymer
exemption definition, and remove the
requirement to determine
confidentiality of production volume in
ranges.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number OPPT–2004–
0106, must be received on or before
February 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket ID number OPPT–
2004–0106, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Agency Website: https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/. EDOCKET,
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system, is EPA’s preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: oppt.ncic@epa.gov.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
number OPPT–2004–0106. The DCO is
open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number OPPT–2004–0106.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA
EDOCKET and the regulations.gov
websites are ‘‘anonymous access’’
systems, which means EPA will not
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through EDOCKET or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit
EDOCKET on-line or see the Federal
Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102)
(FRL–7181–7).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at
https://www.epa.gov/edocket/. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the OPPT Docket, EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Rm. B102,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The EPA Docket Center
Reading Room telephone number is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket, which is
located in the EPA Docket Center, is
(202) 566–0280.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 554–1404; e-mail address:
TSCAHotline@ epa.gov.
For technical information contact:
Susan Sharkey, Project Manager,
Economics, Exposure and Technology
Division (7406M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (202) 564–
8789; e-mail address:
sharkey.susan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture (defined
by statute at 15 U.S.C. 2602(7) to
include import) chemical substances,
including inorganic chemical
substances, subject to reporting under
the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR)
regulations at 40 CFR part 710. Any use
of the term manufacture in this
document will encompass import,
unless otherwise stated. In the past,
persons that only processed chemical
substances have not been required to
comply with the requirements of 40 CFR
part 710. These proposed amendments
do not change the status of processors
under the regulations at 40 CFR part
710. Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Chemical manufacturers and
importers, including chemical
manufacturers and importers of
inorganic chemical substances (NAICS
codes 325, 32411).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions at
40 CFR 710.48. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the technical contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (http:/
/www.epa.gov/edocket), you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 710 is available on E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3659
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
The following is a brief listing of the
proposed changes to the IUR contained
in this action, which are described in
more detail in Unit II.D. EPA is
proposing to:
• Change the reporting cycle from 4
years to 5 years.
• Move the submission period from
the end of the calendar year (August 25
to December 23) to the beginning
(January 1 to April 30).
• Further explain the partial
exemption for chemicals for which the
IUR processing and use information is
of low current interest by clarifying that
petitions must include a written
rationale for changing the exemption
chemical list.
• Clarify the petroleum process
stream partial exemption by adding
‘‘refinery’’ to the name of the exemption
and amend the partial exemption by
adding certain petroleum process
streams.
• Amend the list of commercial and
consumer product use categories by
combining two categories into one,
adding a category, and deleting a
category.
• Require separate reporting of
manufacture and import volumes.
• Restrict the reporting of processing
and use information to domestic
processing and use activities only.
• Edit the polymer exemption
definition to refer solely to chemical
substance identification via the Master
Inventory File, by removing the
reference to the 1985 edition of the
Inventory.
• Remove the requirement to
determine confidentiality of production
volume in ranges.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
EPA is required under TSCA section
8(b), 15 U.S.C. 2607(b), to compile and
keep current an inventory of chemical
substances manufactured or processed
in the United States. This inventory is
known as the TSCA Chemical
Substances Inventory (the TSCA
Inventory). In 1977, EPA promulgated a
rule (42 FR 64572, December 23, 1977)
under TSCA section 8(a), 15 U.S.C.
2607(a), to compile an inventory of
chemical substances in commerce at
that time. In 1986, EPA promulgated the
initial IUR under TSCA section 8(a) at
40 CFR part 710 (51 FR 21447, June 12,
1986) to facilitate the periodic updating
of the TSCA Inventory and to support
activities associated with the
implementation of TSCA. In 2003, EPA
promulgated extensive amendments to
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3660
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the IUR (68 FR 848, January 7, 2003)
(FRL–6767–4) (2003 Amendments) to
collect manufacturing, processing, and
use exposure-related information, and to
make certain other changes.
TSCA section 8(a)(1) authorizes the
EPA Administrator to promulgate rules
under which manufacturers and
processors of chemical substances and
mixtures (referred to hereinafter as
chemical substances) must maintain
such records and submit such
information as the Administrator may
reasonably require. TSCA section 8(a)
generally excludes small manufacturers
and processors of chemical substances
from the reporting requirements
established in TSCA section 8(a).
However, EPA is authorized by TSCA
section 8(a)(3) to require TSCA section
8(a) reporting from small manufacturers
and processors with respect to any
chemical substance that is the subject of
a rule proposed or promulgated under
TSCA section 4, 5(b)(4), or 6, or that is
the subject of an order under TSCA
section 5(e), or that is the subject of
relief that has been granted pursuant to
a civil action under TSCA section 5 or
7. The standard for determining whether
an entity qualifies as a small
manufacturer for purposes of 40 CFR
part 710 generally is defined in 40 CFR
704.3. Processors are not currently
subject to the regulations at 40 CFR part
710.
C. What is the Inventory Update
Reporting (IUR) Regulation?
The data reported under the IUR are
used to update the information
maintained on the TSCA Inventory. EPA
uses the TSCA Inventory and data
reported under the IUR to support many
TSCA-related activities and to provide
overall support for a number of EPA and
other Federal health, safety, and
environmental protection activities.
The IUR, as amended by the 2003
Amendments in January 2003, requires
U.S. manufacturers (including
importers) of chemicals listed on the
TSCA Inventory to report to EPA every
4 years the identity of chemical
substances manufactured during the
reporting year in quantities of 25,000
pounds or more at any plant site they
own or control. The IUR generally
excludes several categories of
substances from its reporting
requirements, i.e., polymers,
microorganisms, naturally occurring
chemical substances, and certain natural
gas substances. Plant sites are required
to report information such as company
name, plant site location and other
identifying information, identity and
production volume of the reportable
chemical substance, manufacturing
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
exposure-related information associated
with each reportable chemical
substance, including the physical form
and maximum concentration of the
chemical substance and the number of
potentially exposed workers.
Manufacturers (including importers)
of larger volume chemicals (i.e., 300,000
lbs. or more manufactured (including
imported) during the reporting year at
any plant site) are additionally required
to report certain processing and use
information (40 CFR 710.52(c)(4)). This
information includes process or use
category, NAICS code, industrial
function category, percent production
volume associated with each process or
use category, number of use sites,
number of potentially exposed workers,
and consumer/commercial information
such as use category, use in or on
products intended for use by children,
and maximum concentration.
For the 2006 submission period,
inorganic chemicals, regardless of
production volume, are partially exempt
(i.e., submitters do not report processing
and use information for inorganic
chemicals). After the 2006 reporting
period, the partial exemption for
inorganic chemicals will no longer be
applicable and submitters will fully
report information on inorganic
chemical substances. In addition,
specifically listed petroleum process
streams and other specifically listed
chemical substances are partially
exempt, and manufacturers of such
substances are not required to report
processing and use information during
the 2006 submission period as well as
subsequent submission periods.
D. What Changes is the Agency
Proposing to Make?
Through this action, EPA is proposing
to make further changes to the IUR. The
following discussion describes the
proposed changes to the IUR contained
in this action.
1. Reporting frequency and
recordkeeping. The IUR regulations
require reporting every 4 years. The first
submission period since the 2003
Amendments will occur in 2006, at
which time submitters will report
information generated during the 2005
reporting year. In this action, EPA is
proposing to change the reporting
frequency after the 2005 reporting year
from every 4 years to every 5 years. This
means that, instead of occurring in
2009, the second reporting year since
the 2003 Amendments would be 2010
(i.e., 5 years after 2005) and would then
occur every 5 years thereafter. The
submission period would continue to
occur in the year following the reporting
year, i.e., 2011, 2016, etc.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA agreed to make the reporting
frequency changes during interagency
review of the 2003 Amendments, in an
effort to further reduce the potential
reporting burden. EPA estimates that a
5–year frequency would save regulated
entities from $59.3 to $75.7 million over
20 years at a 3% discount rate (about a
16% reduction), and from $41.2 to $52.6
million over 20 years at a 7% discount
rate, and would still meet EPA’s most
critical data needs (Ref. 1).
Submitters currently are required to
retain records related to and including
their IUR submissions for a period of 5
years, beginning with the last day of the
submission period (i.e., for a submission
period ending April 30, 2006, based on
the submission period proposed in Unit
II.D.2., submitters would be required to
retain records relevant to that
submission until April 30, 2011). EPA is
not proposing to change this
requirement; however, the Agency
encourages submitters to retain records
longer than 5 years to ensure that past
records are available as a reference
when submitters are generating
subsequent submissions.
2. Submission period. IUR submitters
are required to report on a recurring
basis from August 25 to December 23
every 4 years (40 CFR 710.53). EPA is
proposing to change the submission
period to occur from January 1 to April
30. This change is related to the
reporting year change in the 2003
Amendments from fiscal year to
calendar year.
The August to December submission
period was originally used because
many companies’ fiscal years end in
July, and starting the IUR submission
period in late August meant that these
companies reported their most current
information as soon as possible after the
end of the reporting year (i.e., the year
during which the information to be
reported was generated). However,
under the amended regulations,
submitters will now report on a
calendar year basis, making an earlier
submission period more appropriate
because it would allow sites to submit
their information to EPA closer in time
to the period during which it was
generated. This, in turn, would allow
the Agency to obtain and process the
information in a more timely manner,
and therefore make the information
available for use closer to the time
period which the information describes
and therefore making the information
more timely. As the chemical industry
is dynamic, information which is more
timely is most likely to better describe
the industry than information which is
less timely.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
EPA seeks comment on other possible
submission periods and may adopt a
submission period in the final rule that
differs from the proposed January
through April period. Suggested
alternatives should be accompanied by
an explanation indicating why the
alternative period more appropriately
meets submitters’, the Agency’s, and the
public’s best interests than the proposed
submission period.
The submission period occurs in the
year following the reporting year. As
described in Unit II.D.1., EPA is
proposing to change the reporting
frequency from every 4 years to every 5
years, which means that the reporting
year, and therefore the submission
period, would occur every 5 years (i.e.,
after the 2006 submission period, the
next submission period would occur in
2011).
3. ‘‘Low current interest’’ partial
exemption. 40 CFR 710.46(b)(2)
contains the requirements for the
exemption of certain chemicals for
which EPA has determined the IUR
processing and use information to be of
‘‘low current interest’’ from reporting
requirements listed in 40 CFR
710.52(c)(4). The public may ask EPA to
change the list of chemicals partially
exempt from reporting under 40 CFR
710.46(b)(2) (whether by adding or
removing a chemical to or from the list).
Currently, the request must be in
writing, must identify the chemical in
question, including a chemical
identification number, and should
include sufficient information for EPA
to determine whether collection of the
information in 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4) for
the chemical in question is of low
current interest.
In order to ensure that the public
understands what requests need to
contain, and to allow the Agency to
make decisions about the listing/
delisting of chemicals in the most
expedient manner, EPA is clarifying that
a request for listing/delisting must
provide written rationale or justification
for the request, accompanied by relevant
documents, and including specific cites
to information in those documents. The
rationale needs to provide sufficient
information upon which the Agency can
assess the current need for IUR
processing and use information and can
make a decision concerning reporting of
that information for the subject
chemical. It is a petitioner’s burden to
demonstrate why a given chemical
substance should be considered of low
current interest.
In determining whether the partial
exemption should apply to a particular
chemical substance, EPA will consider
the totality of information available for
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
the chemical substance in question,
including but not limited to information
associated with one or more of the
following considerations listed in 40
CFR 710.46(b)(2)(ii). Additionally, EPA
is clarifying consideration 6 by
proposing to delete the phrase ‘‘by EPA
or another agency or authority.’’ EPA is
proposing this deletion because the
Agency did not intend to limit
consideration 6 to Federal Government
risk management actions. The amended
considerations are:
(i) Whether the chemical qualifies or
has qualified in past IUR collections for
the reporting of the information
described in 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4) (i.e., at
least one site manufactures 300,000
pounds or more of the chemical).
(ii) The chemical substance’s
chemical and physical properties or
potential for persistence,
bioaccumulation, health effects, or
environmental effects (considered
independently or together).
(iii) The information needs of EPA,
other federal agencies, tribes, states, and
local governments, as well as members
of the public.
(iv) The availability of other
complementary risk screening
information.
(v) The availability of comparable
processing and use information.
(vi) Whether the potential risks of the
chemical substance are adequately
managed.
Petitioners should also include any
additional information not specifically
covered by the listed considerations that
would inform the Agency’s decision
concerning current interest in the IUR
processing and use information. For
instance, a chemical’s physical/
chemical properties may be such that
exposure is unlikely, and the IUR
processing and use information is likely
to be of low interest. In its review of the
petition, the Agency will consider each
petitioned chemical substance
individually, will conduct a limited
search for information not provided in
the petition to see if there are additional
concerns or issues, and will make a
decision based upon the totality of
information identified.
It is important to note that the
addition of a chemical substance under
this partial exemption will not
necessarily be based on the potential
risks of the chemical and that the
Agency will not perform a formal risk
analysis as part of the petition review,
but that EPA’s decision will be based on
the Agency’s current assessment of the
need for collecting IUR processing and
use information for that chemical, based
upon the totality of information
considered during the petition review
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3661
process. Additionally, interest in a
chemical or a chemical’s processing and
use information may increase in the
future, at which time EPA will
reconsider the applicability of this
partial exemption for those chemicals.
EPA is making this clarification in
reaction to the first round of requests for
consideration which were received by
December 30, 2003. It was always EPA’s
intent that the requests contain
supporting rationale associated with the
request, and that the rationale
specifically address at least the
considerations outlined in 40 CFR
710.46(b)(2)(ii). Instead, EPA has
received a number of requests that only
cite the existence of another document,
e.g., an Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Screening Information Data Set (SIDS)
Initial Assessment Report (SIAR), as
support, without any discussion of the
document’s relevance to the
considerations or why the document
supports a determination of low current
interest. It is a requester’s burden to
demonstrate in a clear, well supported
manner, why a given chemical
substance should be considered of low
current interest. EPA is today proposing
to clarify the required contents of a
petition for this exemption.
4. Partially exempt petroleum refinery
process streams. Certain listed
petroleum refinery process streams are
partially exempt from reporting under
IUR. Specifically, they are exempt from
the downstream processing and use
reporting requirements described in 40
CFR 710.52(c)(4) (see 40 CFR
710.46(b)(1)). This list of substances was
derived from the 1983 publication of the
American Petroleum Institute (API)
entitled ‘‘Petroleum Process Stream
Terms Included in the Chemical
Substances Inventory Under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA)’’ (Ref.
2). In order to update the list in 40 CFR
710.46(b)(1), and in response to
suggestions from API (Ref. 3), EPA is
proposing to change the exemption
name by adding the term ‘‘refinery’’ and
to amend the list to add certain
petroleum process streams which have
been added to the TSCA Inventory since
the 1983 publication was compiled.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to add
two petroleum refinery process streams
that were inadvertently left off the
initial partial exemption list established
by 68 FR 854 (CAS numbers: 68919–16–
4 and 61789–60–4). The two substances
are listed in the 1983 publication and
meet the requirements for listing under
this exemption.
EPA is proposing to change the name
of the partial exemption to ‘‘petroleum
refinery process streams’’ to clarify the
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3662
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
types of covered substances, which are
restricted to petroleum refinery process
streams. This change is consistent with
EPA’s January 1978 Addendum I to the
TSCA Candidate List of Chemical
Substances, entitled ‘‘Generic Terms
Covering Petroleum Refinery Process
Streams’’ (Addendum I) (Ref. 4). The
decision criteria used to develop both
the current list in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1)
and the proposed additions to the list
were applied in a manner consistent
with Addendum I.
API identified 125 potential
petroleum refinery process streams that
were on the TSCA Inventory as of July
2003, but were not included in the 1983
API publication. API stated that ‘‘the
1983 document comprised substances
that were included in the original TSCA
Inventory (May 1979) or in the
Cumulative Supplement II (May 1982).
In the over twenty years since then,
petroleum refinery process streams have
been added to the TSCA Inventory
when companies have submitted
premanufacture notifications (PMNs)
and subsequent notices of
commencement (NOCs) for new
chemical substances’’ (Ref. 3).
EPA reviewed API’s list of identified
substances (Ref. 5), and determined that
three are already included in the partial
exemption for certain petroleum
refinery process streams. The Chemical
Abstract Service (CAS) numbers for
these chemicals are: 68187–60–0,
68918–98–9, and 68921–09–5. The
Agency has tentatively determined that
the following 25 substances are
considered petroleum refinery process
streams for the purposes of reporting
under IUR and is proposing to add these
substances to the partial exemption list
in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1): 67254–74–4,
67891–81–0, 67891–86–5, 68476–27–7,
68477–98–5, 68477–99–6, 68478–31–9,
68513–03–1, 68514–39–6, 73138–65–5,
92045–43–7, 92045–58–4, 92062–09–4,
98859–55–3, 98859–56–4, 101316–73–8,
164907–78–2, 164907–79–3, 178603–
63–9, 178603–64–0, 178603–65–1,
178603–66–2, 212210–93–0, 221120–
39–4, and 445411–73–4.
EPA also determined that the
following 14 substances are already
fully exempt from IUR reporting under
the polymer exemption at 40 CFR
710.46(a)(1): 68911–05–7, 68938–55–6,
68952–09–0, 69430–34–8, 69430–35–9,
71302–83–5, 74552–82–2, 88526–47–0,
93685–79–1, 100815–94–9, 106233–12–
9, 106233–13–0, 120928–15–6, and
163440–93–5.
The Agency has also tentatively
determined that the remaining 83
substances are not considered
petroleum refinery process streams for
purposes of reporting under IUR and are
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
therefore not eligible for the partial
exemption under 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1)
(Ref 5). In making this determination,
EPA would like to point out that
petrochemicals are not considered
petroleum process streams for the
purposes of reporting under IUR.
Qualifying petroleum process streams
are produced only in a petroleum
refinery, are further refined at the same
site, and are processed and used in
closed equipment, or are used as fuel.
Petrochemicals often have names
sounding similar to petroleum refinery
process streams, but can be made using
a synthetic process such as a chemical
reaction. A petrochemical encompasses
a wide variety of chemical substances
processed and used in a variety of
venues, may be processed and used in
different manners in the venues with
differing likelihoods of exposure, and
may be solids or otherwise not require
that the equipment in which they are
processed be closed. The petrochemical
thereby may have a variety of uses and
exposure scenarios, and is not limited to
being site-limited or used as a fuel, as
are the petroleum refinery process
streams.
These 83 substances not being added
to the petroleum refinery process
streams exemption are identified by
CAS number and fit into one or more of
four categories (the substance is listed
under the category most appropriate):
(i) The chemical substance consists of
a complex mixture of one class of
hydrocarbons, e.g., all alkanes or all
alkenes (with defined carbon number
ranges) and aromatic hydrocarbons
(without defined carbon number range),
which do not specify petroleum as a
source material in the chemical name,
CAS numbers: 68333–90–4, 68409–73–
4, 68551–15–5, 68551–16–6, 68551–17–
7, 68551–18–8, 68551–19–9, 68551–20–
2, 68603–35–0, 68989–41–3, 68990–23–
8, 70024–92–9, 72162–34–6, 73138–29–
1, 74664–93–0, 90622–46–1, 93762–80–
2, 93924–07–3, 93924–10–8, 93924–11–
9, 129813–66–7, 129813–67–8, 131459–
42–2, 289711–49–5, 289711–48–4,
329909–27–5, 426260–76–6.
(ii) The chemical substance is a well
defined alkylbenzene, or is an
alkylbenzene fractionation product or
distillation residues. Alkylbenzenes are
typical downstream petrochemical
products that are made synthetically
from benzene and paraffinic
hydrocarbons in a chemical process that
does not involve refinery processing,
CAS numbers: 67774–74–7, 68855–24–
3, 68936–98–1, 68936–99–2, 68987–40–
6, 70356–32–0, 85117–41–5, 85117–43–
7, 94094–93–6, 102783–85–7, 115733–
08–9, 125025–88–9, 129813–59–8,
129813–60–1,129813–61–2, 129813–62–
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3, 129813–63–4, 146865–37–4, 148520–
81–4, 151911–58–9, 151911–60–3,
151911–59–0, 156105–29–2.
(iii) The chemical substance includes
the chemical modification terms
sulfated, bisulfited, sulfurized,
sulfonated, esters, and reaction products
etc., are not substances produced within
the scope of petroleum refining
operations, but rather they are
considered to be products from other
chemical manufacturing processes, CAS
numbers: 68131–94–2, 68131–95–3,
68131–96–4, 68131–97–5, 68201–32–1,
68201–54–7, 68425–32–1, 68442–08–0,
68477–23–6, 68478–11–5, 68603–04–3,
68603–05–4, 68603–06–5, 68603–07–6,
68606–23–5, 68606–38–2, 68649–47–8,
68649–48–9, 68649–49–0, 68814–88–0,
68815–10–1, 68920–58–1, 68990–36–3,
71820–39–8, 73138–64–4, 73665–18–6,
96471–07–7, 102479–87–8, 108083–43–
8, 108083–44–9, 111163–74–7, 152699–
00–8, 216977–01–4 (Ref. 5).
(iv) The chemical substance is derived
using a chemical process (a FischerTropsch process) from a non-petroleum
source, CAS number: 277316–99–1 (Ref.
5).
5. Consumer and commercial product
categories. Certain submitters must
designate the commercial and consumer
product category or categories that best
describe the commercial and consumer
products in which each reportable
chemical substance is used (see 40 CFR
710.52(c)(4)(iii)(A)). Following
promulgation of the 2003 Amendments,
EPA had discussions with the American
Chemistry Council, the Consumer
Specialty Products Association, and The
Fertilizer Institute about these
categories. In light of these discussions
and EPA’s own research, the Agency is
proposing the following changes to the
list of categories:
(i) Combine the categories of ‘‘Soaps
and Detergents’’ and ‘‘Polishes and
Sanitation Goods’’ to form a new
category called ‘‘Cleaning Products
(non-pesticidal).’’ EPA further
considered these two categories, and
believes that manufacturers might have
difficulty differentiating between
downstream categories which are so
similar. Both categories relate to
cleaning goods. Combining the
categories does not reduce the utility of
the information to EPA, and it allows
manufacturers to avoid making difficult
distinctions.
(ii) Remove the category
‘‘Photographic chemicals.’’ This
deletion is in recognition of the
changing photography industry. The
Photo Marketing Association notes that
traditional film photofinishing in the
U.S. peaked in 2000, and has been
declining since. Declines of 5–10%
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
annually should continue through at
least 2006 (Ref. 6). EPA believes that
this decline indicates that consumer/
commercial exposure issues associated
with photographic chemicals may be of
diminished importance, and therefore
proposes to eliminate ‘‘Photographic
chemicals’’ as a category. As a result of
this revision, photosensitive chemicals
will be reported in the ‘‘Other’’ category,
designated as U33. The Agency will be
able to distinguish these chemicals by
the distinctive NAICS numbers
associated with use of these chemical
substances.
(iii) Add a category called
‘‘Agricultural products (nonpesticidal).’’ The Fertilizer Institute
identified that a major use of chemicals
for consumer/commercial uses is in
agriculture, an area not covered by the
consumer/commercial categories. EPA
is proposing to add a category for
‘‘agricultural products (non-pesticidal)’’
to ensure that this end use would not be
combined into the ‘‘other’’ category.
6. Production volume reporting.
Submitters are currently required to
report the total production volume (i.e.,
the sum of manufactured and imported
volumes) for each reportable chemical
substance (40 CFR 710.52(c)(3)(iv)) and
a statement indicating whether the
substance is manufactured in the U.S.,
imported into the U.S., or both
manufactured and imported into the
U.S. (40 CFR 710.52(c)(3)(ii)). Prior to
the 2003 Amendments, submitters were
required to report the manufactured
volume separately from the imported
volume for each reportable chemical
substance. EPA often has need for either
import or domestic manufacture
information on chemical substances,
thus the Agency is proposing to return
to the previous method of reporting
manufactured volume separately from
imported volume. As these volumes
were previously reported separately,
EPA expects that these values are
reasonably ascertainable and that any
increase in burden is negligible (Ref. 1).
Many chemicals are both
manufactured domestically and
imported at the same site. The ability to
differentiate between domestically
manufactured and imported volumes is
important to understand the nature of
chemical production in the U.S. This
information is used to characterize the
markets and structure of the chemical
industry in the U.S., providing context
for decision makers as they consider
alternative policy choices. Additionally,
the separation between domestically
manufactured and imported volumes is
important for initial exposure
evaluations of a chemical and for
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
assessing international trade
implications.
7. Reporting processing and use
information for domestic activities only.
Submitters with production volumes of
300,000 lbs. or greater for a reportable
chemical substance are currently
required to report processing and use
information (i.e., the information to be
reported under 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4)),
without restrictions, to the extent the
information is readily obtainable. EPA is
proposing to limit the information to be
reported under 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4) to
domestic processing and use activities
only. Submitters would not report on
processing or use activities that occur
outside the U.S. In other words, the
industrial processing or use operations
(40 CFR 710.52(c)(4)(i)(A)) and
commercial and consumer uses (40 CFR
710.52(c)(4)(ii)(A)) reported by
submitters would be domestic
operations and uses. For example, if a
manufacturer produces 350,000 lbs. of a
reportable chemical substance, directly
exports 100,000 lbs., and sells 250,000
lbs. within the U.S., the manufacturer
would have to report processing and use
information for the 250,000 lbs. sold
within the U.S.
EPA is proposing to limit the
reporting of information to domestic
processing and use activities only for
two main reasons. First, the IUR
collection does not distinguish between
domestic and foreign activities; there is
no way to identify if the information
submitted covers domestic or foreign
activities. EPA generally has a stronger
interest in domestic processing and use
information. Second, removing the need
to report on foreign processing and use
activities reduces the burden associated
with reporting to the IUR (Ref. 1).
8. Polymer exemption. Chemical
substances meeting the definition for
polymers included in 40 CFR
710.46(a)(1) are fully exempt from
reporting under the IUR. EPA is
proposing to change the references
included in the polymer definition from
the ‘‘1985 edition of the Inventory or the
Master Inventory File’’ to solely the
more general and current ‘‘Master
Inventory File’’ by removing the
reference to the 1985 edition of the
Inventory. The Master Inventory File
has been regularly updated since the
1985 edition of the Inventory was
published, and is the more appropriate
reference for use within the IUR
polymer exemption.
9. Production volume range
confidentiality claims. Submitters who
claim production volume as
confidential are currently additionally
required to indicate whether they are
also claiming a specified range within
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3663
which the production volume falls as
confidential (40 CFR 710.52 (c)(3)(v)).
EPA added this provision in the 2003
Amendments in an effort to promote the
release of more general production
volume information for an individual
plant site. EPA is now proposing to
remove this requirement. EPA currently
releases aggregated, chemical-specific,
TSCA production volume information
in ranges that are similar to, but not the
same as, the ranges specified in 40 CFR
710.52(c)(3)(v). The Agency has a
concern that the existence of competing
sets of ranges, some with confidentiality
claims and some without, would
complicate the release of aggregated
production volume information and
reduce the amount of useful information
available to the public. As the intent in
adding this provision in the 2003
Amendments was to increase the
information available to the public, the
Agency is proposing to remove this
requirement (although specific
production volumes could still be
claimed as confidential). Information
claimed as CBI under 40 CFR 710.58
will not be disclosed by EPA except in
accordance with the procedures set
forth at 40 CFR part 2.
III. Materials in the Rulemaking Record
1. USEPA, ‘‘Economic Analysis of the
IUR Revisions Proposed Rule,’’ Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
September 2004.
2. American Petroleum Institute,
‘‘Petroleum Process Stream Terms
Included in the Chemical Substances
Inventory Under the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA),’’ Health and Safety
Regulation Committee Task Force on
Toxic Substances Control, February
1985.
3. E-mail from Glen Barrett, American
Petroleum Institute, to Susan Sharkey,
EPA, ‘‘Proposed Petroleum Refinery
Process Streams to be Added to Streams
Listed in the IURA Rule (i.e., CFR
710.46(b)(1)),’’ February 25, 2004.
4. USEPA, ‘‘Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) PL 94–469 Candidate List of
Chemical Substances Addendum I
Generic Terms Covering Petroleum
Refinery Process Streams,’’ January
1978.
5. USEPA, ‘‘Technical Support
Document Inventory Update Rule
Petroleum Refinery Process Stream
Partial Exemption Added Refinery
Process Chemicals’’ OPPT, April 17,
2004.
6. Photo Marketing Association
International, ‘‘Photo Industry 2004:
Review and Forecast,’’ February 2004,
available at https://www.pmai.org/
new_pma/Marketing_Research/
Photo%20Industry%202004.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3664
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
subject to review by OMB because it
does not meet the criteria in section 3(f)
of the Executive Order.
EPA has prepared an economic
analysis of the potential impacts of this
action, which is contained in a
document entitled Economic Analysis of
the IUR Revisions Proposed Rule (Ref.
1). This document is available as a part
of the public version of the official
record for this action and is briefly
summarized here.
These revisions will reduce IUR
reporting costs. The quantified portions
of the rule are estimated to save $6
million to $7 million per year when
annualized over the next 20 years at a
3% or a 7% discount rate. Most of the
savings of these revisions will accrue to
the chemical industry in the form of
decreased costs of complying with the
IUR. There will also be some savings to
EPA in the form of decreased costs to
administer the regulation and maintain
the collected data.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under the
PRA, unless it has been approved by
OMB and displays a currently valid
OMB control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations, after
initial display in the Federal Register
and in addition to its display on any
related collection instrument, are listed
in 40 CFR part 9.
The information collection
requirements related to the IUR have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to the PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0162. This action would
not impose any burden requiring
additional OMB approval. Instead, this
action would reduce reporting burden
by 113,000 to 123,000 hours in the 2006
reporting cycle and 112,000 to 121,000
hours in subsequent reporting cycles.
This reduction is out of a total burden
of 1,300,000 to 1,658,000 hours in the
2006 reporting cycle, and 1,189,000 to
1,516,000 in future reporting cycles.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division (2822), Office of
Environmental Information,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Please remember to include
the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby
certifies that promulgation of this action
would not have a significant adverse
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual
basis for the Agency’s determination is
summarized below.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ includes
small businesses, small not-for-profit
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions, but because not-for-profit
organizations and governmental
jurisdictions will not be affected by this
rule, ‘‘small entity’’ in this analysis is
synonymous with small business.
Small manufacturers that fully meet
the 40 CFR 704.3 definition are
generally exempt from reporting under
IUR, and thus are not significantly
impacted by IUR reporting.
Nevertheless, this rulemaking is
expected to reduce IUR reporting costs
for businesses of all sizes. Thus, EPA
concludes that these revisions will not
result in significant adverse effects on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4), EPA has determined that
this regulatory action does not contain
a Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more
for State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or for the private sector
in any 1 year. As described in Unit
IV.A., the rule is expected to decrease
expenditures by $6 million to $7 million
per year. EPA has also determined that
the rule would not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments and
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202, 203, 204, and 205 of
UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule, if finalized,
would not have a substantial direct
effect on states, on the relationship
between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule, if finalized, also
would not have tribal implications
because it is not expected to have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000).
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use.
I. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
Since this action does not involve any
technical standards, section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104–113, section 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this
action.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
This action does not involve special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as required by Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
K. Executive Order 12988
In issuing this proposed rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3665
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988, entitled Civil Justice Reform (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 710
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous materials, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Susan B. Hazen.
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 710—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 710
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a).
§ 710.43
[Amended]
2. Section 710.43 is amended by
revising the phrase ‘‘4–year intervals’’ to
read ‘‘5–year intervals’’ in the definition
for ‘‘reporting year.’’
3. Section 710.46 is amended as
follows:
a. By removing the phrase ‘‘the 1985
edition of the Inventory or in’’ in
paragraph (a)(1)(i).
b. By removing the phrase ‘‘the 1985
edition of the Inventory or’’ in
paragraph (a)(1)(ii).
c. By revising the paragraph heading
for paragraph (b)(1).
d. By revising the table title to the
table in paragraph (b)(1).
e. By relisting in ascending order the
entries for 68514–36–3, 68514–37–4,
68514–38–5, 68814–87–9, and 68921–
09–5 and adding entries in ascending
order to the table in paragraph (b)(1).
f. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(F).
g. By removing the third, fourth, and
fifth sentences in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A)
and adding a new third sentence.
h. By revising the phrase ‘‘4–year
intervals’’ to read ‘‘5–year intervals’’ in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(C).
§ 710.46 Chemical substances for which
information must be reported.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Petroleum refinery process
streams. * * *
CAS NUMBERS OF PARTIALLY EXEMPT
SUBSTANCES TERMED ‘‘PETROLEUM
REFINERY PROCESS STREAMS’’ FOR
PURPOSES OF INVENTORY UPDATE
REPORTING
CAS No.
61789–60–4 ..............
VerDate jul<14>2003
Product
Pitch
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
CAS NUMBERS OF PARTIALLY EXEMPT CAS NUMBERS OF PARTIALLY EXEMPT
SUBSTANCES TERMED ‘‘PETROLEUM
SUBSTANCES TERMED ‘‘PETROLEUM
REFINERY PROCESS STREAMS’’ FOR
REFINERY PROCESS STREAMS’’ FOR
PURPOSES OF INVENTORY UPDATE
PURPOSES OF INVENTORY UPDATE
REPORTING—Continued
REPORTING—Continued
CAS No.
Product
*
*
*
*
*
67254–74–4 .............. Naphthenic oils
*
*
*
*
*
67891–81–0 .............. Distillates (petroleum), oxidized
light, potassium
salts
*
*
*
*
*
67891–86–5 .............. Hydrocarbon waxes
(petroleum),
oxidized, compds.
with
diisopropanolamine
*
*
*
*
*
68476–27–7 .............. Fuel gases, amine
system residues
*
*
*
*
*
68477–98–5 .............. Gases (petroleum),
hydrotreater blend
oil recycle, hydrogen-nitrogen rich
68477–99–6 .............. Gases (petroleum),
isomerized naphtha
fractionater, C4rich, hydrogen
sulfide- free
*
*
*
*
*
68478–31–9 .............. Tail gas (petroleum),
isomerized naphtha
fractionates, hydrogen sulfide-free
*
*
*
*
*
68513–03–1 .............. Naphtha (petroleum),
light catalytic reformed, arom.-free
*
*
*
*
*
68514–39–6 .............. Naphtha (petroleum),
light steamcracked, isoprenerich
*
*
*
*
*
68919–16–4 .............. Hydrocarbons, catalytic alkylation, byproducts, C3-6
*
*
*
*
*
73138–65–5 .............. Hydrocarbon waxes
(petroleum),
oxidized, magnesium salts
92045–43–7 .............. Lubricating oils (petroleum),
hydrocracked
nonarom. solvent
deparaffined
92045–58–4 .............. Naphtha (petroleum),
isomerization, C6fraction
92062–09–4 .............. Slack wax (petroleum), hydrotreated
*
*
*
*
*
98859–55–3 .............. Distillates (petroleum), oxidized
heavy, compds.
with diethanolamine
98859–56–4 .............. Distillates (petroleum), oxidized
heavy, sodium salts
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CAS No.
Product
101316–73–8 ............
Lubricating oils (petroleum), used,
noncatalytically refined
Extracts (petroleum),
asphaltene-low
vacuum residue
solvent
Residues (petroleum),
vacuum, asphaltene-low
Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum,
hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C1025
Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum,
hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C1530, branched and
cyclic
Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum,
hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C2040, branched and
cyclic
Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum,
hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C2555, branched and
cyclic
Solvent naphtha (petroleum), heavy
arom., distn. residues
Distillates (petroleum), cracked
steam-cracked, C512 fraction
Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum,
hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C1025, branched and
cyclic
164907–78–2 ............
164907–79–3 ............
178603–63–9 ............
178603–64–0 ............
178603–65–1 ............
178603–66–2 ............
212210–93–0 ............
221120–39–4 ............
445411–73–4 ............
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(F) Whether the potential risks of the
chemical substance are adequately
managed.
(iii) * * *
(A) * * * Requests must identify
the chemical in question, as well as its
CAS number or other chemical
identification number as identified in
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3666
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
§ 710.52(c)(3)(i), and must contain a
written rationale for the request that
provides sufficient specific information,
addressing the considerations listed in
§ 710.46(b)(2)(ii), including cites and
relevant documents, to demonstrate to
EPA that the collection of the
information in § 710.52(c)(4) for the
chemical in question either is or is not
of low current interest. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 710.48
[Amended]
4. Section 710.48 is amended by
revising the phrase ‘‘4–year intervals’’ to
read ‘‘5–year intervals’’ in paragraph (a).
5. Section 710.52 is amended as
follows:
a. By revising the phrase ‘‘4–year
intervals’’ to read ‘‘5–year intervals’’ in
the first and last sentences of the
introductory text, and in the
introductory text of paragraphs (c)(2),
(c)(3), and (c)(4).
b. By revising paragraph (c)(3)(iv).
c. By removing paragraph (c)(3)(v) and
redesignating existing paragraphs
(c)(3)(vi), (c)(3)(vii), (c)(3)(viii), and
(c)(3)(ix) as paragraphs (c)(3)(v),
(c)(3)(vi), (c)(3)(vii), and (c)(3)(viii),
respectively.
d. By revising the phrase ‘‘paragraph
(c)(3)(viii)’’ to read ‘‘paragraph
(c)(3)(vii)’’ in newly designated
paragraph (c)(3)(viii).
e. By adding a sentence after the third
sentence in paragraph (c)(4).
f. By revising the table in paragraph
(c)(4)(ii)(A).
§ 710.52
Reporting information to EPA.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) The total volume (in pounds) of
each reportable chemical substance
manufactured and imported at each site.
The total manufactured volume (not
including imported volume) and the
total imported volume must be
separately reported. This amount must
be reported to two significant figures of
accuracy provided that the reported
figures are within ±10% of the actual
volume.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * * Information reported
in response to this paragraph is limited
to domestic (i.e., within the United
States) processing and use activities. *
* *
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:20 Jan 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
CODES FOR REPORTING COMMERCIAL a period of 5 years beginning on the last
AND CONSUMER PRODUCT CAT- day of the submission period.
EGORIES
Codes
Category
C01 ........................
Adhesives and
sealants
Agricultural products (non-pesticidal)
Artists’ supplies
Automotive care
products
Cleaning products
(non-pesticidal)
Electrical and electronic products
Fabrics, textiles
and apparel
Glass and ceramic
products
Lawn and garden
products (nonpesticidal)
Leather products
Lubricants,
greases and fuel
additives
Metal products
Paints and coatings
Paper products
Rubber and plastic
products
Transportation
products
Wood and wood
furniture
Other
C02 ........................
C03 ........................
C04 ........................
C05 ........................
C06 ........................
C07 ........................
C08 ........................
C09 ........................
C10 ........................
C11 ........................
C12 ........................
C13 ........................
C14 ........................
C15 ........................
C16 ........................
C17 ........................
C18 ........................
*
*
*
*
*
6. By revising § 710.53 to read as
follows:
§ 710.53
When to report.
All information reported to EPA in
response to the requirements of this
subpart must be submitted during an
applicable submission period. The first
submission period is from January 1,
2006, to April 30, 2006. Subsequent
recurring submission periods are from
January 1 to April 30 at 5–year intervals
after the first submission period. Any
person described in § 710.48(a) must
report during each submission period
for each chemical substance described
in § 710.45 that the person
manufactured (including imported)
during the preceding calendar year (i.e.,
the ‘‘reporting year’’).
7. By revising § 710.57 to read as
follows:
§ 710.57
Reporting requirements.
Each person who is subject to the
reporting requirements of this subpart
must retain records that document any
information reported to EPA. Records
relevant to reporting during a
submission period must be retained for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitters are encouraged to retain
their records longer than 5 years to
ensure that past records are available as
a reference when new submissions are
being generated.
[FR Doc. 05–1380 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 05–28, MB Docket No.05–4, RM–11133]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Hagerstown and Myersville, MD
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document seeks
comment on a petition for rulemaking
filed by Manning Broadcasting, Inc.,
licensee of Station WARX (FM),
Hagerstown, Maryland, proposing the
reallotment of Channel 295B from
Hagerstown to Myersville, Maryland, as
the community’s first local transmission
service, and the modification of the
license for Station WARX (FM) to reflect
the new community. Channel 295B has
been proposed to be reallotted at
Myersville at a site 3.9 kilometers (2.4
miles) west of the community at
coordinates 39–29–57 NL and 77–36–42
WL.
DATES: Comments or counterproposals
must be filed on or before March 3,
2005, and reply comments on or before
March 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC,
interested parties should serve the
petitioner’s counsel, as follows: David
D. Oxenford, Esq., Veronica D.
McLaughlin-Tippett, Esq., Shaw
Pittmann, LLP, 2300 N Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20037–1128.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria M. McCauley, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–2180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No.
05–4, adopted January 5, 2005, and
released January 10, 2005. The full text
of this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the
Commission’s Reference Center, 445
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 26, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3658-3666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1380]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 710
[OPPT-2004-0106; FRL-7332-2]
RIN 2070-AC61
TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing amendments to the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) regulations.
The IUR currently requires certain manufacturers (including importers)
of certain chemical substances on the TSCA Chemical Substances
Inventory to report data on chemical manufacturing, processing, and use
every 4 years. EPA is proposing to extend the reporting cycle, modify
the timing of the submission period, further clarify the new partial
exemption for specific chemicals of low current interest, amend the
petroleum refinery process streams partial exemption, amend the list of
consumer and commercial product categories, revise the manner in which
production volume would be reported, restrict reporting of processing
and use information to domestic processing and use activities only,
edit the polymer exemption definition, and remove the requirement to
determine confidentiality of production volume in ranges.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPPT-
2004-0106, must be received on or before February 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket ID number OPPT-
2004-0106, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Website: https://www.epa.gov/edocket/. EDOCKET,
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: oppt.ncic@epa.gov.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
Attention: Docket ID number OPPT-2004-0106. The DCO is open from 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number OPPT-2004-
0106. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA EDOCKET and the regulations.gov
websites are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not
[[Page 3659]]
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA
without going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit EDOCKET on-line or see the Federal Register of May 31,
2002 (67 FR 38102) (FRL-7181-7).
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the EDOCKET index
at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the OPPT Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Rm.
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The EPA Docket Center Reading Room telephone
number is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket,
which is located in the EPA Docket Center, is (202) 566-0280.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; e-mail address: TSCAHotline@
epa.gov.
For technical information contact: Susan Sharkey, Project Manager,
Economics, Exposure and Technology Division (7406M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8789; e-mail address: sharkey.susan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture
(defined by statute at 15 U.S.C. 2602(7) to include import) chemical
substances, including inorganic chemical substances, subject to
reporting under the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) regulations at 40
CFR part 710. Any use of the term manufacture in this document will
encompass import, unless otherwise stated. In the past, persons that
only processed chemical substances have not been required to comply
with the requirements of 40 CFR part 710. These proposed amendments do
not change the status of processors under the regulations at 40 CFR
part 710. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not
limited to:
Chemical manufacturers and importers, including chemical
manufacturers and importers of inorganic chemical substances (NAICS
codes 325, 32411).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions at 40 CFR 710.48. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical contact person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket), you may
access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 710
is available on E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
The following is a brief listing of the proposed changes to the IUR
contained in this action, which are described in more detail in Unit
II.D. EPA is proposing to:
Change the reporting cycle from 4 years to 5 years.
Move the submission period from the end of the calendar
year (August 25 to December 23) to the beginning (January 1 to April
30).
Further explain the partial exemption for chemicals for
which the IUR processing and use information is of low current interest
by clarifying that petitions must include a written rationale for
changing the exemption chemical list.
Clarify the petroleum process stream partial exemption by
adding ``refinery'' to the name of the exemption and amend the partial
exemption by adding certain petroleum process streams.
Amend the list of commercial and consumer product use
categories by combining two categories into one, adding a category, and
deleting a category.
Require separate reporting of manufacture and import
volumes.
Restrict the reporting of processing and use information
to domestic processing and use activities only.
Edit the polymer exemption definition to refer solely to
chemical substance identification via the Master Inventory File, by
removing the reference to the 1985 edition of the Inventory.
Remove the requirement to determine confidentiality of
production volume in ranges.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
EPA is required under TSCA section 8(b), 15 U.S.C. 2607(b), to
compile and keep current an inventory of chemical substances
manufactured or processed in the United States. This inventory is known
as the TSCA Chemical Substances Inventory (the TSCA Inventory). In
1977, EPA promulgated a rule (42 FR 64572, December 23, 1977) under
TSCA section 8(a), 15 U.S.C. 2607(a), to compile an inventory of
chemical substances in commerce at that time. In 1986, EPA promulgated
the initial IUR under TSCA section 8(a) at 40 CFR part 710 (51 FR
21447, June 12, 1986) to facilitate the periodic updating of the TSCA
Inventory and to support activities associated with the implementation
of TSCA. In 2003, EPA promulgated extensive amendments to
[[Page 3660]]
the IUR (68 FR 848, January 7, 2003) (FRL-6767-4) (2003 Amendments) to
collect manufacturing, processing, and use exposure-related
information, and to make certain other changes.
TSCA section 8(a)(1) authorizes the EPA Administrator to promulgate
rules under which manufacturers and processors of chemical substances
and mixtures (referred to hereinafter as chemical substances) must
maintain such records and submit such information as the Administrator
may reasonably require. TSCA section 8(a) generally excludes small
manufacturers and processors of chemical substances from the reporting
requirements established in TSCA section 8(a). However, EPA is
authorized by TSCA section 8(a)(3) to require TSCA section 8(a)
reporting from small manufacturers and processors with respect to any
chemical substance that is the subject of a rule proposed or
promulgated under TSCA section 4, 5(b)(4), or 6, or that is the subject
of an order under TSCA section 5(e), or that is the subject of relief
that has been granted pursuant to a civil action under TSCA section 5
or 7. The standard for determining whether an entity qualifies as a
small manufacturer for purposes of 40 CFR part 710 generally is defined
in 40 CFR 704.3. Processors are not currently subject to the
regulations at 40 CFR part 710.
C. What is the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) Regulation?
The data reported under the IUR are used to update the information
maintained on the TSCA Inventory. EPA uses the TSCA Inventory and data
reported under the IUR to support many TSCA-related activities and to
provide overall support for a number of EPA and other Federal health,
safety, and environmental protection activities.
The IUR, as amended by the 2003 Amendments in January 2003,
requires U.S. manufacturers (including importers) of chemicals listed
on the TSCA Inventory to report to EPA every 4 years the identity of
chemical substances manufactured during the reporting year in
quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at any plant site they own or
control. The IUR generally excludes several categories of substances
from its reporting requirements, i.e., polymers, microorganisms,
naturally occurring chemical substances, and certain natural gas
substances. Plant sites are required to report information such as
company name, plant site location and other identifying information,
identity and production volume of the reportable chemical substance,
manufacturing exposure-related information associated with each
reportable chemical substance, including the physical form and maximum
concentration of the chemical substance and the number of potentially
exposed workers.
Manufacturers (including importers) of larger volume chemicals
(i.e., 300,000 lbs. or more manufactured (including imported) during
the reporting year at any plant site) are additionally required to
report certain processing and use information (40 CFR 710.52(c)(4)).
This information includes process or use category, NAICS code,
industrial function category, percent production volume associated with
each process or use category, number of use sites, number of
potentially exposed workers, and consumer/commercial information such
as use category, use in or on products intended for use by children,
and maximum concentration.
For the 2006 submission period, inorganic chemicals, regardless of
production volume, are partially exempt (i.e., submitters do not report
processing and use information for inorganic chemicals). After the 2006
reporting period, the partial exemption for inorganic chemicals will no
longer be applicable and submitters will fully report information on
inorganic chemical substances. In addition, specifically listed
petroleum process streams and other specifically listed chemical
substances are partially exempt, and manufacturers of such substances
are not required to report processing and use information during the
2006 submission period as well as subsequent submission periods.
D. What Changes is the Agency Proposing to Make?
Through this action, EPA is proposing to make further changes to
the IUR. The following discussion describes the proposed changes to the
IUR contained in this action.
1. Reporting frequency and recordkeeping. The IUR regulations
require reporting every 4 years. The first submission period since the
2003 Amendments will occur in 2006, at which time submitters will
report information generated during the 2005 reporting year. In this
action, EPA is proposing to change the reporting frequency after the
2005 reporting year from every 4 years to every 5 years. This means
that, instead of occurring in 2009, the second reporting year since the
2003 Amendments would be 2010 (i.e., 5 years after 2005) and would then
occur every 5 years thereafter. The submission period would continue to
occur in the year following the reporting year, i.e., 2011, 2016, etc.
EPA agreed to make the reporting frequency changes during
interagency review of the 2003 Amendments, in an effort to further
reduce the potential reporting burden. EPA estimates that a 5-year
frequency would save regulated entities from $59.3 to $75.7 million
over 20 years at a 3% discount rate (about a 16% reduction), and from
$41.2 to $52.6 million over 20 years at a 7% discount rate, and would
still meet EPA's most critical data needs (Ref. 1).
Submitters currently are required to retain records related to and
including their IUR submissions for a period of 5 years, beginning with
the last day of the submission period (i.e., for a submission period
ending April 30, 2006, based on the submission period proposed in Unit
II.D.2., submitters would be required to retain records relevant to
that submission until April 30, 2011). EPA is not proposing to change
this requirement; however, the Agency encourages submitters to retain
records longer than 5 years to ensure that past records are available
as a reference when submitters are generating subsequent submissions.
2. Submission period. IUR submitters are required to report on a
recurring basis from August 25 to December 23 every 4 years (40 CFR
710.53). EPA is proposing to change the submission period to occur from
January 1 to April 30. This change is related to the reporting year
change in the 2003 Amendments from fiscal year to calendar year.
The August to December submission period was originally used
because many companies' fiscal years end in July, and starting the IUR
submission period in late August meant that these companies reported
their most current information as soon as possible after the end of the
reporting year (i.e., the year during which the information to be
reported was generated). However, under the amended regulations,
submitters will now report on a calendar year basis, making an earlier
submission period more appropriate because it would allow sites to
submit their information to EPA closer in time to the period during
which it was generated. This, in turn, would allow the Agency to obtain
and process the information in a more timely manner, and therefore make
the information available for use closer to the time period which the
information describes and therefore making the information more timely.
As the chemical industry is dynamic, information which is more timely
is most likely to better describe the industry than information which
is less timely.
[[Page 3661]]
EPA seeks comment on other possible submission periods and may
adopt a submission period in the final rule that differs from the
proposed January through April period. Suggested alternatives should be
accompanied by an explanation indicating why the alternative period
more appropriately meets submitters', the Agency's, and the public's
best interests than the proposed submission period.
The submission period occurs in the year following the reporting
year. As described in Unit II.D.1., EPA is proposing to change the
reporting frequency from every 4 years to every 5 years, which means
that the reporting year, and therefore the submission period, would
occur every 5 years (i.e., after the 2006 submission period, the next
submission period would occur in 2011).
3. ``Low current interest'' partial exemption. 40 CFR 710.46(b)(2)
contains the requirements for the exemption of certain chemicals for
which EPA has determined the IUR processing and use information to be
of ``low current interest'' from reporting requirements listed in 40
CFR 710.52(c)(4). The public may ask EPA to change the list of
chemicals partially exempt from reporting under 40 CFR 710.46(b)(2)
(whether by adding or removing a chemical to or from the list).
Currently, the request must be in writing, must identify the chemical
in question, including a chemical identification number, and should
include sufficient information for EPA to determine whether collection
of the information in 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4) for the chemical in question
is of low current interest.
In order to ensure that the public understands what requests need
to contain, and to allow the Agency to make decisions about the
listing/delisting of chemicals in the most expedient manner, EPA is
clarifying that a request for listing/delisting must provide written
rationale or justification for the request, accompanied by relevant
documents, and including specific cites to information in those
documents. The rationale needs to provide sufficient information upon
which the Agency can assess the current need for IUR processing and use
information and can make a decision concerning reporting of that
information for the subject chemical. It is a petitioner's burden to
demonstrate why a given chemical substance should be considered of low
current interest.
In determining whether the partial exemption should apply to a
particular chemical substance, EPA will consider the totality of
information available for the chemical substance in question, including
but not limited to information associated with one or more of the
following considerations listed in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(2)(ii).
Additionally, EPA is clarifying consideration 6 by proposing to delete
the phrase ``by EPA or another agency or authority.'' EPA is proposing
this deletion because the Agency did not intend to limit consideration
6 to Federal Government risk management actions. The amended
considerations are:
(i) Whether the chemical qualifies or has qualified in past IUR
collections for the reporting of the information described in 40 CFR
710.52(c)(4) (i.e., at least one site manufactures 300,000 pounds or
more of the chemical).
(ii) The chemical substance's chemical and physical properties or
potential for persistence, bioaccumulation, health effects, or
environmental effects (considered independently or together).
(iii) The information needs of EPA, other federal agencies, tribes,
states, and local governments, as well as members of the public.
(iv) The availability of other complementary risk screening
information.
(v) The availability of comparable processing and use information.
(vi) Whether the potential risks of the chemical substance are
adequately managed.
Petitioners should also include any additional information not
specifically covered by the listed considerations that would inform the
Agency's decision concerning current interest in the IUR processing and
use information. For instance, a chemical's physical/chemical
properties may be such that exposure is unlikely, and the IUR
processing and use information is likely to be of low interest. In its
review of the petition, the Agency will consider each petitioned
chemical substance individually, will conduct a limited search for
information not provided in the petition to see if there are additional
concerns or issues, and will make a decision based upon the totality of
information identified.
It is important to note that the addition of a chemical substance
under this partial exemption will not necessarily be based on the
potential risks of the chemical and that the Agency will not perform a
formal risk analysis as part of the petition review, but that EPA's
decision will be based on the Agency's current assessment of the need
for collecting IUR processing and use information for that chemical,
based upon the totality of information considered during the petition
review process. Additionally, interest in a chemical or a chemical's
processing and use information may increase in the future, at which
time EPA will reconsider the applicability of this partial exemption
for those chemicals.
EPA is making this clarification in reaction to the first round of
requests for consideration which were received by December 30, 2003. It
was always EPA's intent that the requests contain supporting rationale
associated with the request, and that the rationale specifically
address at least the considerations outlined in 40 CFR
710.46(b)(2)(ii). Instead, EPA has received a number of requests that
only cite the existence of another document, e.g., an Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Screening Information Data
Set (SIDS) Initial Assessment Report (SIAR), as support, without any
discussion of the document's relevance to the considerations or why the
document supports a determination of low current interest. It is a
requester's burden to demonstrate in a clear, well supported manner,
why a given chemical substance should be considered of low current
interest. EPA is today proposing to clarify the required contents of a
petition for this exemption.
4. Partially exempt petroleum refinery process streams. Certain
listed petroleum refinery process streams are partially exempt from
reporting under IUR. Specifically, they are exempt from the downstream
processing and use reporting requirements described in 40 CFR
710.52(c)(4) (see 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1)). This list of substances was
derived from the 1983 publication of the American Petroleum Institute
(API) entitled ``Petroleum Process Stream Terms Included in the
Chemical Substances Inventory Under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA)'' (Ref. 2). In order to update the list in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1),
and in response to suggestions from API (Ref. 3), EPA is proposing to
change the exemption name by adding the term ``refinery'' and to amend
the list to add certain petroleum process streams which have been added
to the TSCA Inventory since the 1983 publication was compiled.
Additionally, EPA is proposing to add two petroleum refinery process
streams that were inadvertently left off the initial partial exemption
list established by 68 FR 854 (CAS numbers: 68919-16-4 and 61789-60-4).
The two substances are listed in the 1983 publication and meet the
requirements for listing under this exemption.
EPA is proposing to change the name of the partial exemption to
``petroleum refinery process streams'' to clarify the
[[Page 3662]]
types of covered substances, which are restricted to petroleum refinery
process streams. This change is consistent with EPA's January 1978
Addendum I to the TSCA Candidate List of Chemical Substances, entitled
``Generic Terms Covering Petroleum Refinery Process Streams'' (Addendum
I) (Ref. 4). The decision criteria used to develop both the current
list in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1) and the proposed additions to the list were
applied in a manner consistent with Addendum I.
API identified 125 potential petroleum refinery process streams
that were on the TSCA Inventory as of July 2003, but were not included
in the 1983 API publication. API stated that ``the 1983 document
comprised substances that were included in the original TSCA Inventory
(May 1979) or in the Cumulative Supplement II (May 1982). In the over
twenty years since then, petroleum refinery process streams have been
added to the TSCA Inventory when companies have submitted
premanufacture notifications (PMNs) and subsequent notices of
commencement (NOCs) for new chemical substances'' (Ref. 3).
EPA reviewed API's list of identified substances (Ref. 5), and
determined that three are already included in the partial exemption for
certain petroleum refinery process streams. The Chemical Abstract
Service (CAS) numbers for these chemicals are: 68187-60-0, 68918-98-9,
and 68921-09-5. The Agency has tentatively determined that the
following 25 substances are considered petroleum refinery process
streams for the purposes of reporting under IUR and is proposing to add
these substances to the partial exemption list in 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1):
67254-74-4, 67891-81-0, 67891-86-5, 68476-27-7, 68477-98-5, 68477-99-6,
68478-31-9, 68513-03-1, 68514-39-6, 73138-65-5, 92045-43-7, 92045-58-4,
92062-09-4, 98859-55-3, 98859-56-4, 101316-73-8, 164907-78-2, 164907-
79-3, 178603-63-9, 178603-64-0, 178603-65-1, 178603-66-2, 212210-93-0,
221120-39-4, and 445411-73-4.
EPA also determined that the following 14 substances are already
fully exempt from IUR reporting under the polymer exemption at 40 CFR
710.46(a)(1): 68911-05-7, 68938-55-6, 68952-09-0, 69430-34-8, 69430-35-
9, 71302-83-5, 74552-82-2, 88526-47-0, 93685-79-1, 100815-94-9, 106233-
12-9, 106233-13-0, 120928-15-6, and 163440-93-5.
The Agency has also tentatively determined that the remaining 83
substances are not considered petroleum refinery process streams for
purposes of reporting under IUR and are therefore not eligible for the
partial exemption under 40 CFR 710.46(b)(1) (Ref 5). In making this
determination, EPA would like to point out that petrochemicals are not
considered petroleum process streams for the purposes of reporting
under IUR. Qualifying petroleum process streams are produced only in a
petroleum refinery, are further refined at the same site, and are
processed and used in closed equipment, or are used as fuel.
Petrochemicals often have names sounding similar to petroleum refinery
process streams, but can be made using a synthetic process such as a
chemical reaction. A petrochemical encompasses a wide variety of
chemical substances processed and used in a variety of venues, may be
processed and used in different manners in the venues with differing
likelihoods of exposure, and may be solids or otherwise not require
that the equipment in which they are processed be closed. The
petrochemical thereby may have a variety of uses and exposure
scenarios, and is not limited to being site-limited or used as a fuel,
as are the petroleum refinery process streams.
These 83 substances not being added to the petroleum refinery
process streams exemption are identified by CAS number and fit into one
or more of four categories (the substance is listed under the category
most appropriate):
(i) The chemical substance consists of a complex mixture of one
class of hydrocarbons, e.g., all alkanes or all alkenes (with defined
carbon number ranges) and aromatic hydrocarbons (without defined carbon
number range), which do not specify petroleum as a source material in
the chemical name, CAS numbers: 68333-90-4, 68409-73-4, 68551-15-5,
68551-16-6, 68551-17-7, 68551-18-8, 68551-19-9, 68551-20-2, 68603-35-0,
68989-41-3, 68990-23-8, 70024-92-9, 72162-34-6, 73138-29-1, 74664-93-0,
90622-46-1, 93762-80-2, 93924-07-3, 93924-10-8, 93924-11-9, 129813-66-
7, 129813-67-8, 131459-42-2, 289711-49-5, 289711-48-4, 329909-27-5,
426260-76-6.
(ii) The chemical substance is a well defined alkylbenzene, or is
an alkylbenzene fractionation product or distillation residues.
Alkylbenzenes are typical downstream petrochemical products that are
made synthetically from benzene and paraffinic hydrocarbons in a
chemical process that does not involve refinery processing, CAS
numbers: 67774-74-7, 68855-24-3, 68936-98-1, 68936-99-2, 68987-40-6,
70356-32-0, 85117-41-5, 85117-43-7, 94094-93-6, 102783-85-7, 115733-08-
9, 125025-88-9, 129813-59-8, 129813-60-1,129813-61-2, 129813-62-3,
129813-63-4, 146865-37-4, 148520-81-4, 151911-58-9, 151911-60-3,
151911-59-0, 156105-29-2.
(iii) The chemical substance includes the chemical modification
terms sulfated, bisulfited, sulfurized, sulfonated, esters, and
reaction products etc., are not substances produced within the scope of
petroleum refining operations, but rather they are considered to be
products from other chemical manufacturing processes, CAS numbers:
68131-94-2, 68131-95-3, 68131-96-4, 68131-97-5, 68201-32-1, 68201-54-7,
68425-32-1, 68442-08-0, 68477-23-6, 68478-11-5, 68603-04-3, 68603-05-4,
68603-06-5, 68603-07-6, 68606-23-5, 68606-38-2, 68649-47-8, 68649-48-9,
68649-49-0, 68814-88-0, 68815-10-1, 68920-58-1, 68990-36-3, 71820-39-8,
73138-64-4, 73665-18-6, 96471-07-7, 102479-87-8, 108083-43-8, 108083-
44-9, 111163-74-7, 152699-00-8, 216977-01-4 (Ref. 5).
(iv) The chemical substance is derived using a chemical process (a
Fischer-Tropsch process) from a non-petroleum source, CAS number:
277316-99-1 (Ref. 5).
5. Consumer and commercial product categories. Certain submitters
must designate the commercial and consumer product category or
categories that best describe the commercial and consumer products in
which each reportable chemical substance is used (see 40 CFR
710.52(c)(4)(iii)(A)). Following promulgation of the 2003 Amendments,
EPA had discussions with the American Chemistry Council, the Consumer
Specialty Products Association, and The Fertilizer Institute about
these categories. In light of these discussions and EPA's own research,
the Agency is proposing the following changes to the list of
categories:
(i) Combine the categories of ``Soaps and Detergents'' and
``Polishes and Sanitation Goods'' to form a new category called
``Cleaning Products (non-pesticidal).'' EPA further considered these
two categories, and believes that manufacturers might have difficulty
differentiating between downstream categories which are so similar.
Both categories relate to cleaning goods. Combining the categories does
not reduce the utility of the information to EPA, and it allows
manufacturers to avoid making difficult distinctions.
(ii) Remove the category ``Photographic chemicals.'' This deletion
is in recognition of the changing photography industry. The Photo
Marketing Association notes that traditional film photofinishing in the
U.S. peaked in 2000, and has been declining since. Declines of 5-10%
[[Page 3663]]
annually should continue through at least 2006 (Ref. 6). EPA believes
that this decline indicates that consumer/commercial exposure issues
associated with photographic chemicals may be of diminished importance,
and therefore proposes to eliminate ``Photographic chemicals'' as a
category. As a result of this revision, photosensitive chemicals will
be reported in the ``Other'' category, designated as U33. The Agency
will be able to distinguish these chemicals by the distinctive NAICS
numbers associated with use of these chemical substances.
(iii) Add a category called ``Agricultural products (non-
pesticidal).'' The Fertilizer Institute identified that a major use of
chemicals for consumer/commercial uses is in agriculture, an area not
covered by the consumer/commercial categories. EPA is proposing to add
a category for ``agricultural products (non-pesticidal)'' to ensure
that this end use would not be combined into the ``other'' category.
6. Production volume reporting. Submitters are currently required
to report the total production volume (i.e., the sum of manufactured
and imported volumes) for each reportable chemical substance (40 CFR
710.52(c)(3)(iv)) and a statement indicating whether the substance is
manufactured in the U.S., imported into the U.S., or both manufactured
and imported into the U.S. (40 CFR 710.52(c)(3)(ii)). Prior to the 2003
Amendments, submitters were required to report the manufactured volume
separately from the imported volume for each reportable chemical
substance. EPA often has need for either import or domestic manufacture
information on chemical substances, thus the Agency is proposing to
return to the previous method of reporting manufactured volume
separately from imported volume. As these volumes were previously
reported separately, EPA expects that these values are reasonably
ascertainable and that any increase in burden is negligible (Ref. 1).
Many chemicals are both manufactured domestically and imported at
the same site. The ability to differentiate between domestically
manufactured and imported volumes is important to understand the nature
of chemical production in the U.S. This information is used to
characterize the markets and structure of the chemical industry in the
U.S., providing context for decision makers as they consider
alternative policy choices. Additionally, the separation between
domestically manufactured and imported volumes is important for initial
exposure evaluations of a chemical and for assessing international
trade implications.
7. Reporting processing and use information for domestic activities
only. Submitters with production volumes of 300,000 lbs. or greater for
a reportable chemical substance are currently required to report
processing and use information (i.e., the information to be reported
under 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4)), without restrictions, to the extent the
information is readily obtainable. EPA is proposing to limit the
information to be reported under 40 CFR 710.52(c)(4) to domestic
processing and use activities only. Submitters would not report on
processing or use activities that occur outside the U.S. In other
words, the industrial processing or use operations (40 CFR
710.52(c)(4)(i)(A)) and commercial and consumer uses (40 CFR
710.52(c)(4)(ii)(A)) reported by submitters would be domestic
operations and uses. For example, if a manufacturer produces 350,000
lbs. of a reportable chemical substance, directly exports 100,000 lbs.,
and sells 250,000 lbs. within the U.S., the manufacturer would have to
report processing and use information for the 250,000 lbs. sold within
the U.S.
EPA is proposing to limit the reporting of information to domestic
processing and use activities only for two main reasons. First, the IUR
collection does not distinguish between domestic and foreign
activities; there is no way to identify if the information submitted
covers domestic or foreign activities. EPA generally has a stronger
interest in domestic processing and use information. Second, removing
the need to report on foreign processing and use activities reduces the
burden associated with reporting to the IUR (Ref. 1).
8. Polymer exemption. Chemical substances meeting the definition
for polymers included in 40 CFR 710.46(a)(1) are fully exempt from
reporting under the IUR. EPA is proposing to change the references
included in the polymer definition from the ``1985 edition of the
Inventory or the Master Inventory File'' to solely the more general and
current ``Master Inventory File'' by removing the reference to the 1985
edition of the Inventory. The Master Inventory File has been regularly
updated since the 1985 edition of the Inventory was published, and is
the more appropriate reference for use within the IUR polymer
exemption.
9. Production volume range confidentiality claims. Submitters who
claim production volume as confidential are currently additionally
required to indicate whether they are also claiming a specified range
within which the production volume falls as confidential (40 CFR 710.52
(c)(3)(v)). EPA added this provision in the 2003 Amendments in an
effort to promote the release of more general production volume
information for an individual plant site. EPA is now proposing to
remove this requirement. EPA currently releases aggregated, chemical-
specific, TSCA production volume information in ranges that are similar
to, but not the same as, the ranges specified in 40 CFR
710.52(c)(3)(v). The Agency has a concern that the existence of
competing sets of ranges, some with confidentiality claims and some
without, would complicate the release of aggregated production volume
information and reduce the amount of useful information available to
the public. As the intent in adding this provision in the 2003
Amendments was to increase the information available to the public, the
Agency is proposing to remove this requirement (although specific
production volumes could still be claimed as confidential). Information
claimed as CBI under 40 CFR 710.58 will not be disclosed by EPA except
in accordance with the procedures set forth at 40 CFR part 2.
III. Materials in the Rulemaking Record
1. USEPA, ``Economic Analysis of the IUR Revisions Proposed Rule,''
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, September 2004.
2. American Petroleum Institute, ``Petroleum Process Stream Terms
Included in the Chemical Substances Inventory Under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA),'' Health and Safety Regulation Committee
Task Force on Toxic Substances Control, February 1985.
3. E-mail from Glen Barrett, American Petroleum Institute, to Susan
Sharkey, EPA, ``Proposed Petroleum Refinery Process Streams to be Added
to Streams Listed in the IURA Rule (i.e., CFR 710.46(b)(1)),'' February
25, 2004.
4. USEPA, ``Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) PL 94-469 Candidate
List of Chemical Substances Addendum I Generic Terms Covering Petroleum
Refinery Process Streams,'' January 1978.
5. USEPA, ``Technical Support Document Inventory Update Rule
Petroleum Refinery Process Stream Partial Exemption Added Refinery
Process Chemicals'' OPPT, April 17, 2004.
6. Photo Marketing Association International, ``Photo Industry
2004: Review and Forecast,'' February 2004, available at https://
www.pmai.org/new_pma/Marketing_Research/Photo%20Industry%202004.pdf.
[[Page 3664]]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has determined that this action is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' subject to review by OMB because it does not meet
the criteria in section 3(f) of the Executive Order.
EPA has prepared an economic analysis of the potential impacts of
this action, which is contained in a document entitled Economic
Analysis of the IUR Revisions Proposed Rule (Ref. 1). This document is
available as a part of the public version of the official record for
this action and is briefly summarized here.
These revisions will reduce IUR reporting costs. The quantified
portions of the rule are estimated to save $6 million to $7 million per
year when annualized over the next 20 years at a 3% or a 7% discount
rate. Most of the savings of these revisions will accrue to the
chemical industry in the form of decreased costs of complying with the
IUR. There will also be some savings to EPA in the form of decreased
costs to administer the regulation and maintain the collected data.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information that requires OMB
approval under the PRA, unless it has been approved by OMB and displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations, after initial display in the Federal Register and in
addition to its display on any related collection instrument, are
listed in 40 CFR part 9.
The information collection requirements related to the IUR have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to the PRA under OMB control
number 2070-0162. This action would not impose any burden requiring
additional OMB approval. Instead, this action would reduce reporting
burden by 113,000 to 123,000 hours in the 2006 reporting cycle and
112,000 to 121,000 hours in subsequent reporting cycles. This reduction
is out of a total burden of 1,300,000 to 1,658,000 hours in the 2006
reporting cycle, and 1,189,000 to 1,516,000 in future reporting cycles.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division (2822), Office of Environmental
Information, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby certifies that promulgation
of this action would not have a significant adverse economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for the
Agency's determination is summarized below.
The term ``small entities'' includes small businesses, small not-
for-profit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions, but
because not-for-profit organizations and governmental jurisdictions
will not be affected by this rule, ``small entity'' in this analysis is
synonymous with small business.
Small manufacturers that fully meet the 40 CFR 704.3 definition are
generally exempt from reporting under IUR, and thus are not
significantly impacted by IUR reporting. Nevertheless, this rulemaking
is expected to reduce IUR reporting costs for businesses of all sizes.
Thus, EPA concludes that these revisions will not result in significant
adverse effects on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4), EPA has determined that this regulatory action does
not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or for the private sector in any 1 year. As described in
Unit IV.A., the rule is expected to decrease expenditures by $6 million
to $7 million per year. EPA has also determined that the rule would not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments and is not subject
to the requirements of sections 202, 203, 204, and 205 of UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule, if finalized, would not have a substantial
direct effect on states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule, if finalized, also would not have tribal
implications because it is not expected to have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000).
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, and
this action does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this action
is not expected to affect energy supply, distribution, or use.
I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
Since this action does not involve any technical standards, section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), does
not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
This action does not involve special considerations of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
K. Executive Order 12988
In issuing this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
[[Page 3665]]
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988, entitled
Civil Justice Reform (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 710
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous materials, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Susan B. Hazen.
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 710--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 710 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a).
Sec. 710.43 [Amended]
2. Section 710.43 is amended by revising the phrase ``4-year
intervals'' to read ``5-year intervals'' in the definition for
``reporting year.''
3. Section 710.46 is amended as follows:
a. By removing the phrase ``the 1985 edition of the Inventory or
in'' in paragraph (a)(1)(i).
b. By removing the phrase ``the 1985 edition of the Inventory or''
in paragraph (a)(1)(ii).
c. By revising the paragraph heading for paragraph (b)(1).
d. By revising the table title to the table in paragraph (b)(1).
e. By relisting in ascending order the entries for 68514-36-3,
68514-37-4, 68514-38-5, 68814-87-9, and 68921-09-5 and adding entries
in ascending order to the table in paragraph (b)(1).
f. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(F).
g. By removing the third, fourth, and fifth sentences in paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A) and adding a new third sentence.
h. By revising the phrase ``4-year intervals'' to read ``5-year
intervals'' in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(C).
Sec. 710.46 Chemical substances for which information must be
reported.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Petroleum refinery process streams. * * *
CAS Numbers of Partially Exempt Substances Termed ``Petroleum Refinery
Process Streams'' for Purposes of Inventory Update Reporting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAS No. Product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
61789-60-4................................ Pitch
* * * * *
67254-74-4................................ Naphthenic oils
* * * * *
67891-81-0................................ Distillates (petroleum),
oxidized light, potassium
salts
* * * * *
67891-86-5................................ Hydrocarbon waxes
(petroleum), oxidized,
compds. with
diisopropanolamine
* * * * *
68476-27-7................................ Fuel gases, amine system
residues
* * * * *
68477-98-5................................ Gases (petroleum),
hydrotreater blend oil
recycle, hydrogen-nitrogen
rich
68477-99-6................................ Gases (petroleum),
isomerized naphtha
fractionater, C4-rich,
hydrogen sulfide- free
* * * * *
68478-31-9................................ Tail gas (petroleum),
isomerized naphtha
fractionates, hydrogen
sulfide-free
* * * * *
68513-03-1................................ Naphtha (petroleum), light
catalytic reformed, arom.-
free
* * * * *
68514-39-6................................ Naphtha (petroleum), light
steam-cracked, isoprene-
rich
* * * * *
68919-16-4................................ Hydrocarbons, catalytic
alkylation, by-products, C3-
6
* * * * *
73138-65-5................................ Hydrocarbon waxes
(petroleum), oxidized,
magnesium salts
92045-43-7................................ Lubricating oils
(petroleum), hydrocracked
nonarom. solvent
deparaffined
92045-58-4................................ Naphtha (petroleum),
isomerization, C6-fraction
92062-09-4................................ Slack wax (petroleum),
hydrotreated
* * * * *
98859-55-3................................ Distillates (petroleum),
oxidized heavy, compds.
with diethanolamine
98859-56-4................................ Distillates (petroleum),
oxidized heavy, sodium
salts
101316-73-8............................... Lubricating oils
(petroleum), used,
noncatalytically refined
164907-78-2............................... Extracts (petroleum),
asphaltene-low vacuum
residue solvent
164907-79-3............................... Residues (petroleum),
vacuum, asphaltene-low
178603-63-9............................... Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum, hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C10-25
178603-64-0............................... Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum, hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C15-30,
branched and cyclic
178603-65-1............................... Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum, hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C20-40,
branched and cyclic
178603-66-2............................... Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum, hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C25-55,
branched and cyclic
212210-93-0............................... Solvent naphtha (petroleum),
heavy arom., distn.
residues
221120-39-4............................... Distillates (petroleum),
cracked steam-cracked, C5-
12 fraction
445411-73-4............................... Gas oils (petroleum),
vacuum, hydrocracked,
hydroisomerized,
hydrogenated, C10-25,
branched and cyclic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(F) Whether the potential risks of the chemical substance are
adequately managed.
(iii) * * *
(A) * * * Requests must identify the chemical in question, as well
as its CAS number or other chemical identification number as identified
in
[[Page 3666]]
Sec. 710.52(c)(3)(i), and must contain a written rationale for the
request that provides sufficient specific information, addressing the
considerations listed in Sec. 710.46(b)(2)(ii), including cites and
relevant documents, to demonstrate to EPA that the collection of the
information in Sec. 710.52(c)(4) for the chemical in question either
is or is not of low current interest. * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 710.48 [Amended]
4. Section 710.48 is amended by revising the phrase ``4-year
intervals'' to read ``5-year intervals'' in paragraph (a).
5. Section 710.52 is amended as follows:
a. By revising the phrase ``4-year intervals'' to read ``5-year
intervals'' in the first and last sentences of the introductory text,
and in the introductory text of paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4).
b. By revising paragraph (c)(3)(iv).
c. By removing paragraph (c)(3)(v) and redesignating existing
paragraphs (c)(3)(vi), (c)(3)(vii), (c)(3)(viii), and (c)(3)(ix) as
paragraphs (c)(3)(v), (c)(3)(vi), (c)(3)(vii), and (c)(3)(viii),
respectively.
d. By revising the phrase ``paragraph (c)(3)(viii)'' to read
``paragraph (c)(3)(vii)'' in newly designated paragraph (c)(3)(viii).
e. By adding a sentence after the third sentence in paragraph
(c)(4).
f. By revising the table in paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(A).
Sec. 710.52 Reporting information to EPA.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) The total volume (in pounds) of each reportable chemical
substance manufactured and imported at each site. The total
manufactured volume (not including imported volume) and the total
imported volume must be separately reported. This amount must be
reported to two significant figures of accuracy provided that the
reported figures are within 10% of the actual volume.
* * * * *
(4) * * * Information reported in response to this paragraph is
limited to domestic (i.e., within the United States) processing and use
activities. * * *
* * * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
Codes for Reporting Commercial and Consumer Product Categories
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codes Category
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C01....................................... Adhesives and sealants
C02....................................... Agricultural products (non-
pesticidal)
C03....................................... Artists' supplies
C04....................................... Automotive care products
C05....................................... Cleaning products (non-
pesticidal)
C06....................................... Electrical and electronic
products
C07....................................... Fabrics, textiles and
apparel
C08....................................... Glass and ceramic products
C09....................................... Lawn and garden products
(non-pesticidal)
C10....................................... Leather products
C11....................................... Lubricants, greases and fuel
additives
C12....................................... Metal products
C13....................................... Paints and coatings
C14....................................... Paper products
C15....................................... Rubber and plastic products
C16....................................... Transportation products
C17....................................... Wood and wood furniture
C18....................................... Other
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
6. By revising Sec. 710.53 to read as follows:
Sec. 710.53 When to report.
All information reported to EPA in response to the requirements of
this subpart must be submitted during an applicable submission period.
The first submission period is from January 1, 2006, to April 30, 2006.
Subsequent recurring submission periods are from January 1 to April 30
at 5-year intervals after the first submission period. Any person
described in Sec. 710.48(a) must report during each submission period
for each chemical substance described in Sec. 710.45 that the person
manufactured (including imported) during the preceding calendar year
(i.e., the ``reporting year'').
7. By revising Sec. 710.57 to read as follows:
Sec. 710.57 Reporting requirements.
Each person who is subject to the reporting requirements of this
subpart must retain records that document any information reported to
EPA. Records relevant to reporting during a submission period must be
retained for a period of 5 years beginning on the last day of the
submission period. Submitters are encouraged to retain their records
longer than 5 years to ensure that past records are available as a
reference when new submissions are being generated.
[FR Doc. 05-1380 Filed 1-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S