Al-Alousi, Inc., Denial of Registration, 3561-3563 [05-1324]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Report of Theft or loss of Controlled
Substances—DEA form 106.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: DEA Form 106. Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: Not-for-profit, State, local
or tribal government. Title 21 CFR
1301.74(c) and 1301.76(b) require DEA
registrants to complete and submit a
DEA–106 upon discovery of a theft or
significant loss of controlled substances.
This provides accurate accountability
and allows DEA to monitor substances
diverted for illicit purposes.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: DEA estimates that 5,659
registrants submit 8,310 forms annually
for this collection. DEA estimates that
each response takes 30 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: DEA estimates that this
collection has a public burden of 4,155
hours annually.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:14 Jan 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
If additional information is required
contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: January 14, 2005.
Brenda E. Dyer,
Department Clearance Officer, Department of
Justice.
[FR Doc. 05–1285 Filed 1–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 04–32]
Al-Alousi, Inc., Denial of Registration
On March 16, 2004, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Al-Alousi, Inc. (AAI)
proposing to deny its March 31, 2003,
application for DEA Certificate of
Registration as a distributor of list I
chemicals. The Order to Show Cause
alleged that granting AAI’s application
would be inconsistent with the public
interest, as that term is used in 21 U.S.C.
823(h).
According to the DEA investigative
file, the Order to Show Cause was sent
by certified mail to AAI at its proposed
registered location at 8760 Greenwell
Springs Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
On April 14, 2004, AAI’s owner, Mr.
Humam Al-Alousi, requested a hearing
and on April 26, 2004, Administrative
Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner ordered
the parties to file prehearing statements
by June 7, 2004. This date was later
extended until August 24, 2004. As a
result of AAI’s failure to file a
prehearing statement, Judge Bittner
considered its hearing right to have been
waived and issued an Order
Terminating Proceedings on September
3, 2004. The investigative case file was
then forwarded to the Deputy
Administrator for a final order pursuant
to 21 CFR 1301.46.
The Deputy Administrator finds that
AAI has waived its hearing right and
after considering relevant material from
the investigative file, now enters her
final order without a hearing pursuant
to 21 CFR 1309.53(c) and (d) and
1316.67. The Deputy Administrator
finds as follows.
List I chemicals are those that may be
used in the manufacture of a controlled
substance in violation of the Controlled
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3561
Substances Act. 21 U.S.C. 802(34); 21
CFR 1310.02(a). Pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine are list I chemicals
commonly used to illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance. As noted in
previous DEA final orders,
methamphetamine is an extremely
potent central nervous system
stimulant, and its abuse is a persistent
and growing problem in the United
States. See, e.g., Direct Wholesale, 69
FR 11,654 (2004); Branex, Inc., 69 FR
8,682 (2004); Yemen Wholesale Tobacco
and Candy Supply, Inc., 67 FR 9,997
(2002); Denver Wholesale, 67 FR 99,986
(2002).
The Deputy Administrator’s review of
the investigative file reveals that AAI’s
president is Mr. Al-Alousi and his wife,
Lois Al-Alousi, is vice-president. On or
about March 31, 2003, an application
was submitted by Mrs. Al-Alousi on
behalf of AAI, seeking registration to
distribute ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine list I chemical
products. Subsequently, AAI advised
DEA that its application would only be
for a registration to distribute
pseudoephedrine products.
In connection with the pending
application, an on-site pre-registration
investigation was conducted at the
proposed registered location in May
2003. Mr. Al-Alousi represented to
investigators that he had purchased AAI
in December 2002 and the company had
previously done business at that
location under a different name and
owner.
The investigators’ review showed that
a prior DEA investigation of the former
company and its owner had been
conducted which adduced substantial
information that the company had
distributed list I chemicals without a
DEA registration and knowingly
distributed large quantities of list I
chemicals to methamphetamine
laboratories during the mid-to-late
1990’s. The former owner, a citizen of
Lebanon, had been arrested by U.S.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
officers for willfully and falsely
representing himself as a citizen of the
United States.
At the time of the DEA investigators’
on-site pre-registration inspection of
AAI’s premises, the business sign still
bore the former company’s name and
that name was also on a facsimile cover
sheet and document which was sent by
Mrs. Al-Alousi to DEA investigators
during the pre-registration inquiry.
Mr. Al-Alousi advised investigators
that AAI was now a wholesale
distributor of cigarettes, washing
powder, oil, candy and novelty items to
approximately 150 convenience stores
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
3562
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices
and restaurants in the Baton Rouge area.
He stated that all 150 of AAI’s
customers would be purchasing list I
chemicals. In addition to its wholesale
business, AAI operated a convenience
store at the proposed registered address
and many of its customers came to that
location to pick up purchases at a check
out counter. Given the facility’s set-up,
AAI’s wholesale and retail customers
and all of its employees would have
physical access to the areas where the
listed products would be stored.
During the investigation, the AlAlousi’s were unable to provide
investigators any records of sales and
purchases and stated their records were
transferred weekly to a bookkeeper.
According to a list provided
investigators, the great majority of AAI’s
customers were convenience stores and
gas stations. It was also determined that
neither Mr. nor Mrs. Al-Alousi had any
prior experience in the distribution of
list I chemicals.
On July 9, 2003, investigators
attempted to conduct verifications of
twelve customers from AAI’s list. Two
addresses did not exist; one was a
printing shop that was out of business;
one was an apartment complex; one was
a bar/pool hall; one was a fast-food
stand; two alleged customers advised
they had never done business with
either AAI or its predecessor company;
two others stated they only purchased
paper and plastic products from its
predecessor company and had never
heard of AAI; and one stated he had
purchased list I chemical cold products
from AAI’s predecessor but would not
do so in the future and had never heard
of AAI. The results of these verification
attempts cast doubt on the veracity of
Mr. Al-Alousi’s representations
regarding the nature of AAI’s business
and its prospective customers for list I
chemical products.
DEA is aware that small illicit
laboratories operate with listed
chemical products often procured,
legally or illegally, from non-traditional
retailers of over-the-counter drug
products, such as gas stations and small
retail markets. Some retailers acquire
product from multiple distributors to
mask their acquisition of large amounts
of listed chemicals. In addition, some
individuals utilize sham corporations or
fraudulent records to establish a
commercial identity in order to acquire
listed chemicals.
DEA knows by experience that there
exists a ‘‘gray market’’ in which certain
high strength, high quantity
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
products are distributed only to
convenience stores and gas stations,
from where they have a high incidence
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:14 Jan 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
of diversion. These grey market
products are not sold in large discount
stores, retail pharmacies or grocery
stores, where sales of therapeutic overthe-counter drugs predominate.
DEA also knows from industry data,
market studies and statistical analysis
that over 90 percent of over-the-counter
drug remedies are sold in drug stores,
supermarket chains and ‘‘big box’’
discount retailers. Less than one percent
of cough and cold remedies are sold in
gas stations or convenience stores.
Studies have indicated that most
convenience stores could not be
expected to sell more than $20.00 to
$40.00 worth of products containing
pseudoephedrine per month. The
expected sales of ephedrine products
are known to be even smaller.
Furthermore, convenience stores
handling gray market products often
order more product than what is
required for the legitimate market and
obtain chemical products from multiple
distributors.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(h), the
Deputy Administrator may deny an
application for a Certificate of
Registration if she determines that
granting the registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest.
Section 823(h) requires that the
following factors be considered in
determining the public interest:
(1) Maintenance of effective controls
against diversion of listed chemicals
into other than legitimate channels;
(2) Compliance with applicable
Federal, State and local law;
(3) Any prior conviction record under
Federal or State laws relating to
controlled substances or to chemicals
controlled under Federal or State law;
(4) Any past experience of the
applicant in the manufacture and
distribution of chemicals; and
(5) Such other factors as are relevant
to and consistent with the public health
and safety.
As with the public interest analysis
for practitioners and pharmacies
pursuant to subsection (f) of section 823,
these factors are to be considered in the
disjunctive; the Deputy Administrator
may rely on any one or a combination
of factors and may give each factor the
weight she deems appropriate in
determining whether a registration
should be revoked or an application for
registration denied. See, e.g., Energy
Outlet, 64 FR 14,259 (1999). See also,
Henry J. Schwartz, Jr., M.D., 54 FR
16,422 (1999).
The Deputy Administrator finds
factors one, four and five relevant to the
pending application for registration.
As to factor one, maintenance of
effective controls against diversion of
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
listed chemicals into other than
legitimate channels, the DEA preregistration inspection documented that
many of AAI’s customers would be
coming to the registered location to pick
up their products. Under this procedure,
AAI would not be able to adequately
verify the location and legitimacy of its
customers. Additionally the listed
chemicals would be stored such that
AAI’s retail and wholesale customers, as
well as all of its employees, would have
access to the listed chemical products,
thus increasing risk of diversion.
Accordingly, this factor weighs against
the granting of AAI’s pending
application.
With regard to factor four, the
applicant’s past experience in the
distribution of chemicals, the Deputy
Administrator finds this factor relevant
based on Mr. and Mrs. Al-Alousi’s lack
of knowledge and experience regarding
the laws and regulations governing
handing of list I chemical products. In
prior DEA decisions, this lack of
experience in handling list I chemical
products has been a factor in denying
pending applications for registration.
See, e.g., Direct Wholesale, supra, 69 FR
11,654; ANM Wholesale, 69 FR 11,652
(2004); Xtreme Enterprises Inc.,
67 FR 76,195 (2002).
With regard to factor five, other
factors relevant to and consistent with
the public safety, the Deputy
Administrator finds this factor weighs
heavily against granting the application.
Unlawful methamphetamine use is a
growing public health and safety
concern throughout the United States
and the South. Ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine are precursor products
needed to manufacture
methamphetamine and operators of
illicit methamphetamine laboratories
regularly acquire the precursor products
needed to manufacture the drug from
convenience stores and gas stations
which, in prior DEA decisions, have
been identified as constituting the grey
market for list I chemical products. It is
apparent that AAI intends on being a
participant in this market.
While there are no specific
prohibitions under the Controlled
Substances Act regarding the sale of
listed chemical products to these
entities, DEA has nevertheless found
these establishments serve as sources for
the diversion of large amounts of listed
chemical products. See, e.g., ANM
Wholesale, supra, 69 FR 11,652; Xtreme
Enterprises, Inc., supra, 67 FR 76,195;
Sinbad Distributing, 67 FR 10,232
(2002); K.V.M. Enterprises, 67 FR 70,968
(2002).
The Deputy Administrator has
previously found that many
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices
considerations weighed heavily against
registering a distributor of list I
chemicals because, ‘‘[v]irtually all of the
Respondent’s customers, consisting of
gas station and convenience stores, are
considered part of the grey market, in
which large amounts of listed chemicals
are diverted to the illicit manufacture of
amphetamine and methamphetamine.’’
Xtreme Enterprises, Inc., supra, 67 FR at
76,197. As in Xtreme Enterprises, Inc.,
Mr. and Mrs. Al-Alousi’s lack of a
criminal record and stated intent to
comply with the law and regulations are
far outweighed by their lack of
experience and the company’s intent to
sell pseudoephedrine products almost
exclusively to the gray market.
The Deputy Administrator is also
troubled by AAI’s failure to provide
accurate customer information to DEA
investigators, indicating the company
cannot be trusted to handle the
responsibilities of a registrant. Further,
its continued or implied use of its
predecessor’s name, an entity which
prior investigations had linked with the
diversion of listed chemicals to illicit
laboratories, raises questions about
AAI’s customer base and the risk that its
products might be sold to previous
customers of AAI’s predecessor and
then diverted to illegal purposes.
Based on the foregoing, the Deputy
Administrator concludes that granting
the pending application would be
inconsistent with the public interest.
Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the
authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104,
hereby orders the pending application
for DEA Certificate of Registration,
submitted by Al-Alousi, Inc., be, and it
hereby is, denied. This order is effective
February 24, 2005.
Dated: December 30, 2004.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–1324 Filed 1–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Ray V. Surapaneni, D.O.; Revocation of
Registration
On April 29, 2004, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Ray V. Surapaneni,
D.O. (Dr. Surapaneni) who was notified
of an opportunity to show cause as to
why DEA should not revoke his DEA
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:14 Jan 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
Certificate of Registration, BS3724932,
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3).
Specifically, the Order to Show Cause
alleged that Dr. Surapaneni’s authority
to handle controlled substances in the
State of Missouri had been revoked.
The Order to Show Cause notified Dr.
Surapaneni that should no request for a
hearing be filed within 30 days, his
hearing right would be deemed waived.
Alternatively, he could waive a hearing
and submit a written statement
regarding his position on the matters of
fact and law for the Deputy
Administrator’s consideration, along
with the material within the
investigative case file.
The Order to Show Cause was
initially sent by certified mail to Dr.
Surapaneni at an address which was not
current. On September 2, 2004, the
Order to Show Cause was resent and Dr.
Surapaneni received it on September 6,
2004. In his September 10, 2004, letter
to the Hearing Clerk, DEA Office of
Administrative Law Judges, Dr.
Surapaneni affirmatively waived a
hearing and asked the Deputy
Administrator to not revoke his
registration and to consider the contents
of the letter in deciding the matter.
The Deputy Administrator of DEA,
after considering material from the
investigative file and the written
statement of Dr. Surapaneni, now enters
her final order without a hearing
pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(b) and (e)
1301.46.
The Deputy Administrator finds Dr.
Surapaneni is currently registered with
DEA as a practitioner authorized to
handle controlled substances in
Schedules II through V under DEA
Certificate of Registration BS3724932,
with a registered location of 1515 Union
Avenue, Moberly, Missouri.
According to information in the
investigative file, in June 2003, Dr.
Surapaneni entered into a Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA) with the DEA
Saint Louis Field Division as a
condition of renewing his DEA
registration. Among the MOA’s terms
was a provision that his DEA
registration would terminate
automatically if he were to lose
authority to handle controlled
substances in Missouri, his State of
registration.
On December 9, 2003, the Missouri
Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs (BNDD) notified Dr. Surapaneni
that his Missouri Controlled Substances
Registration No. 307766793, had been
terminated and he did not ‘‘currently
have the authority to conduct any
activities with controlled substances in
the state of Missouri.’’ The investigative
file indicates his state controlled
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3563
substances registration was terminated
because it had been issued for a specific
location in Paris, Missouri and,
pursuant to a March 11, 2003,
Settlement Agreement Between Dr.
Surapaneni and BNDD, his registration
would terminate immediately if he
relocated his professional practice.
BNDD subsequently discovered Dr.
Surapaneni had never been employed
by or practiced at the Paris, Missouri
location. Efforts by DEA diversion
investigators to obtain his certificate by
surrender proved unsuccessful and
show cause proceedings were then
initiated.
In his written statement to the Deputy
Administrator, Dr. Surapaneni indicates
he was unable to join the Paris,
Missouri, practice because he lacked
start-up funds, attributing this financial
plight to a previous office manager
having embezzled $150,000 from him.
Dr. Surapaneni also says he is seeking
medical employment and intends to
reapply for his Missouri registration
once he has found a position.
However, Dr. Surapaneni does not
dispute that his State controlled
substances registration was terminated
by BNDD or claim any current authority
to handle controlled substances in that
State. Therefore, the Deputy
Administrator finds Dr. Surapaneni is
currently not authorized to handle
controlled substances in Missouri.
DEA does not have statutory authority
under the Controlled Substances Act to
issue or maintain a registration if the
applicant or registrant is without State
authority to handle controlled
substances in the State in which he
conducts business. See 21 U.S.C.
802(21), 823(f) and 824(a)(3). This
prerequisite has been consistently
upheld. See Richard J. Clement, M.D.,
68 FR 12, 103 (2003); Dominick A. Ricci,
M.D., 58 FR 51,104 (1993); Bobby Watts,
M.D., 53 FR 11,919 (1988).
Here, it is clear Dr. Surapaneni’s State
controlled substance registration was
terminated and there is no information
that action was ever stayed or that his
registration has been reinstated. As a
result, Dr. Surapaneni is not licensed to
handle controlled substances in
Missouri, where he is registered with
DEA. Therefore, he is not entitled to
maintain that registration.
Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the
authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 824 and 28 C.F.R. 0.100(b) and
0.104, hereby orders that DEA
Certificate of Registration, BS3724932,
issued to Ray V. Surapaneni, D.O., be,
and it hereby is, revoked. The Deputy
Administrator further orders that any
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3561-3563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 04-32]
Al-Alousi, Inc., Denial of Registration
On March 16, 2004, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an
Order to Show Cause to Al-Alousi, Inc. (AAI) proposing to deny its
March 31, 2003, application for DEA Certificate of Registration as a
distributor of list I chemicals. The Order to Show Cause alleged that
granting AAI's application would be inconsistent with the public
interest, as that term is used in 21 U.S.C. 823(h).
According to the DEA investigative file, the Order to Show Cause
was sent by certified mail to AAI at its proposed registered location
at 8760 Greenwell Springs Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. On April 14,
2004, AAI's owner, Mr. Humam Al-Alousi, requested a hearing and on
April 26, 2004, Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner ordered the
parties to file prehearing statements by June 7, 2004. This date was
later extended until August 24, 2004. As a result of AAI's failure to
file a prehearing statement, Judge Bittner considered its hearing right
to have been waived and issued an Order Terminating Proceedings on
September 3, 2004. The investigative case file was then forwarded to
the Deputy Administrator for a final order pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.46.
The Deputy Administrator finds that AAI has waived its hearing
right and after considering relevant material from the investigative
file, now enters her final order without a hearing pursuant to 21 CFR
1309.53(c) and (d) and 1316.67. The Deputy Administrator finds as
follows.
List I chemicals are those that may be used in the manufacture of a
controlled substance in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. 21
U.S.C. 802(34); 21 CFR 1310.02(a). Pseudoephedrine and ephedrine are
list I chemicals commonly used to illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance. As noted in
previous DEA final orders, methamphetamine is an extremely potent
central nervous system stimulant, and its abuse is a persistent and
growing problem in the United States. See, e.g., Direct Wholesale, 69
FR 11,654 (2004); Branex, Inc., 69 FR 8,682 (2004); Yemen Wholesale
Tobacco and Candy Supply, Inc., 67 FR 9,997 (2002); Denver Wholesale,
67 FR 99,986 (2002).
The Deputy Administrator's review of the investigative file reveals
that AAI's president is Mr. Al-Alousi and his wife, Lois Al-Alousi, is
vice-president. On or about March 31, 2003, an application was
submitted by Mrs. Al-Alousi on behalf of AAI, seeking registration to
distribute ephedrine and pseudoephedrine list I chemical products.
Subsequently, AAI advised DEA that its application would only be for a
registration to distribute pseudoephedrine products.
In connection with the pending application, an on-site pre-
registration investigation was conducted at the proposed registered
location in May 2003. Mr. Al-Alousi represented to investigators that
he had purchased AAI in December 2002 and the company had previously
done business at that location under a different name and owner.
The investigators' review showed that a prior DEA investigation of
the former company and its owner had been conducted which adduced
substantial information that the company had distributed list I
chemicals without a DEA registration and knowingly distributed large
quantities of list I chemicals to methamphetamine laboratories during
the mid-to-late 1990's. The former owner, a citizen of Lebanon, had
been arrested by U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service officers
for willfully and falsely representing himself as a citizen of the
United States.
At the time of the DEA investigators' on-site pre-registration
inspection of AAI's premises, the business sign still bore the former
company's name and that name was also on a facsimile cover sheet and
document which was sent by Mrs. Al-Alousi to DEA investigators during
the pre-registration inquiry.
Mr. Al-Alousi advised investigators that AAI was now a wholesale
distributor of cigarettes, washing powder, oil, candy and novelty items
to approximately 150 convenience stores
[[Page 3562]]
and restaurants in the Baton Rouge area. He stated that all 150 of
AAI's customers would be purchasing list I chemicals. In addition to
its wholesale business, AAI operated a convenience store at the
proposed registered address and many of its customers came to that
location to pick up purchases at a check out counter. Given the
facility's set-up, AAI's wholesale and retail customers and all of its
employees would have physical access to the areas where the listed
products would be stored.
During the investigation, the Al-Alousi's were unable to provide
investigators any records of sales and purchases and stated their
records were transferred weekly to a bookkeeper. According to a list
provided investigators, the great majority of AAI's customers were
convenience stores and gas stations. It was also determined that
neither Mr. nor Mrs. Al-Alousi had any prior experience in the
distribution of list I chemicals.
On July 9, 2003, investigators attempted to conduct verifications
of twelve customers from AAI's list. Two addresses did not exist; one
was a printing shop that was out of business; one was an apartment
complex; one was a bar/pool hall; one was a fast-food stand; two
alleged customers advised they had never done business with either AAI
or its predecessor company; two others stated they only purchased paper
and plastic products from its predecessor company and had never heard
of AAI; and one stated he had purchased list I chemical cold products
from AAI's predecessor but would not do so in the future and had never
heard of AAI. The results of these verification attempts cast doubt on
the veracity of Mr. Al-Alousi's representations regarding the nature of
AAI's business and its prospective customers for list I chemical
products.
DEA is aware that small illicit laboratories operate with listed
chemical products often procured, legally or illegally, from non-
traditional retailers of over-the-counter drug products, such as gas
stations and small retail markets. Some retailers acquire product from
multiple distributors to mask their acquisition of large amounts of
listed chemicals. In addition, some individuals utilize sham
corporations or fraudulent records to establish a commercial identity
in order to acquire listed chemicals.
DEA knows by experience that there exists a ``gray market'' in
which certain high strength, high quantity pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine products are distributed only to convenience stores and gas
stations, from where they have a high incidence of diversion. These
grey market products are not sold in large discount stores, retail
pharmacies or grocery stores, where sales of therapeutic over-the-
counter drugs predominate.
DEA also knows from industry data, market studies and statistical
analysis that over 90 percent of over-the-counter drug remedies are
sold in drug stores, supermarket chains and ``big box'' discount
retailers. Less than one percent of cough and cold remedies are sold in
gas stations or convenience stores. Studies have indicated that most
convenience stores could not be expected to sell more than $20.00 to
$40.00 worth of products containing pseudoephedrine per month. The
expected sales of ephedrine products are known to be even smaller.
Furthermore, convenience stores handling gray market products often
order more product than what is required for the legitimate market and
obtain chemical products from multiple distributors.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(h), the Deputy Administrator may deny an
application for a Certificate of Registration if she determines that
granting the registration would be inconsistent with the public
interest. Section 823(h) requires that the following factors be
considered in determining the public interest:
(1) Maintenance of effective controls against diversion of listed
chemicals into other than legitimate channels;
(2) Compliance with applicable Federal, State and local law;
(3) Any prior conviction record under Federal or State laws
relating to controlled substances or to chemicals controlled under
Federal or State law;
(4) Any past experience of the applicant in the manufacture and
distribution of chemicals; and
(5) Such other factors as are relevant to and consistent with the
public health and safety.
As with the public interest analysis for practitioners and
pharmacies pursuant to subsection (f) of section 823, these factors are
to be considered in the disjunctive; the Deputy Administrator may rely
on any one or a combination of factors and may give each factor the
weight she deems appropriate in determining whether a registration
should be revoked or an application for registration denied. See, e.g.,
Energy Outlet, 64 FR 14,259 (1999). See also, Henry J. Schwartz, Jr.,
M.D., 54 FR 16,422 (1999).
The Deputy Administrator finds factors one, four and five relevant
to the pending application for registration.
As to factor one, maintenance of effective controls against
diversion of listed chemicals into other than legitimate channels, the
DEA pre-registration inspection documented that many of AAI's customers
would be coming to the registered location to pick up their products.
Under this procedure, AAI would not be able to adequately verify the
location and legitimacy of its customers. Additionally the listed
chemicals would be stored such that AAI's retail and wholesale
customers, as well as all of its employees, would have access to the
listed chemical products, thus increasing risk of diversion.
Accordingly, this factor weighs against the granting of AAI's pending
application.
With regard to factor four, the applicant's past experience in the
distribution of chemicals, the Deputy Administrator finds this factor
relevant based on Mr. and Mrs. Al-Alousi's lack of knowledge and
experience regarding the laws and regulations governing handing of list
I chemical products. In prior DEA decisions, this lack of experience in
handling list I chemical products has been a factor in denying pending
applications for registration. See, e.g., Direct Wholesale, supra, 69
FR 11,654; ANM Wholesale, 69 FR 11,652 (2004); Xtreme Enterprises Inc.,
67 FR 76,195 (2002).
With regard to factor five, other factors relevant to and
consistent with the public safety, the Deputy Administrator finds this
factor weighs heavily against granting the application. Unlawful
methamphetamine use is a growing public health and safety concern
throughout the United States and the South. Ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine are precursor products needed to manufacture
methamphetamine and operators of illicit methamphetamine laboratories
regularly acquire the precursor products needed to manufacture the drug
from convenience stores and gas stations which, in prior DEA decisions,
have been identified as constituting the grey market for list I
chemical products. It is apparent that AAI intends on being a
participant in this market.
While there are no specific prohibitions under the Controlled
Substances Act regarding the sale of listed chemical products to these
entities, DEA has nevertheless found these establishments serve as
sources for the diversion of large amounts of listed chemical products.
See, e.g., ANM Wholesale, supra, 69 FR 11,652; Xtreme Enterprises,
Inc., supra, 67 FR 76,195; Sinbad Distributing, 67 FR 10,232 (2002);
K.V.M. Enterprises, 67 FR 70,968 (2002).
The Deputy Administrator has previously found that many
[[Page 3563]]
considerations weighed heavily against registering a distributor of
list I chemicals because, ``[v]irtually all of the Respondent's
customers, consisting of gas station and convenience stores, are
considered part of the grey market, in which large amounts of listed
chemicals are diverted to the illicit manufacture of amphetamine and
methamphetamine.'' Xtreme Enterprises, Inc., supra, 67 FR at 76,197. As
in Xtreme Enterprises, Inc., Mr. and Mrs. Al-Alousi's lack of a
criminal record and stated intent to comply with the law and
regulations are far outweighed by their lack of experience and the
company's intent to sell pseudoephedrine products almost exclusively to
the gray market.
The Deputy Administrator is also troubled by AAI's failure to
provide accurate customer information to DEA investigators, indicating
the company cannot be trusted to handle the responsibilities of a
registrant. Further, its continued or implied use of its predecessor's
name, an entity which prior investigations had linked with the
diversion of listed chemicals to illicit laboratories, raises questions
about AAI's customer base and the risk that its products might be sold
to previous customers of AAI's predecessor and then diverted to illegal
purposes.
Based on the foregoing, the Deputy Administrator concludes that
granting the pending application would be inconsistent with the public
interest.
Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C.
823 and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders the pending
application for DEA Certificate of Registration, submitted by Al-
Alousi, Inc., be, and it hereby is, denied. This order is effective
February 24, 2005.
Dated: December 30, 2004.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-1324 Filed 1-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M