Safety Zones; Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone, 3145-3147 [05-1103]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 13 / Friday, January 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Authority and Issuance For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 31 CFR part 285 is amended as follows: I PART 285—DEBT COLLECTION AUTHORITIES UNDER THE DEBT COLLECTION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996 1. The authority citation for part 285 is revised to read as follows: I Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 26 U.S.C. 6402; 31 U.S.C. 321, 3701, 3711, 3716, 3719, 3720A, 3720D; E.O. 13019, 61 FR 51763, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 216. 2. Section 285.5 is amended to revise the section heading, and paragraphs (d)(5)(iv),(d)(10)(v), (f)(3), (g)(1), (g)(3)(iii), and (i)(3) to read as follows: I § 285.5 Centralized offset of Federal payments to collect nontax debts owed to the United States. * * * * * (d) * * * (5) * * * (iv) The address and telephone number of the contact point within the creditor agency who will handle questions, concerns or communications regarding the debt; * * * * * (10) * * * (v) The creditor agency shall notify FMS if it has returned any monies to the debtor/payee. * * * * * (f) * * * (3) Priorities for collecting multiple debts owed by the payee. (i) A levy pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall take precedence over deductions under this section. (ii) When a payment may be offset to collect more than one debt, amounts offset will be applied: (A) First, to satisfy any past due support debts assigned to a State pursuant to sections 402(a)(26) and 471(a)(17) of the Social Security Act (see 26 U.S.C. 6402(c) and §§ 285.1 and 285.3 of this part); (B) Second, to satisfy any debts owed to Federal agencies, as described in this § 285.5; (C) Third, to satisfy any qualifying past-due support claims not assigned to a State (see 26 U.S.C. 6402(c) and §§ 285.1 and 285.3 of this part); and (D) Fourth, to any debts owed to States for debts other than past-due support (see § 285.8 of this part). * * * * * (g) Notices—(1) Warning notice by disbursing official to payee/debtor. Before offsetting a recurring payment, the disbursing official, or FMS on behalf VerDate jul<14>2003 12:09 Jan 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 of the disbursing official, will notify the payee in writing when offsets will begin (which may be stated as a number of days or number of payments from the time of the notice) and the anticipated amount of such offset (which may be stated as a percentage of the payment). Such notice shall also provide the information contained in paragraph (g)(3) of this section. Failure to send such notice does not affect the validity of the offset. * * * * * (3) * * * (iii) The address and telephone number of the contact point within the creditor agency who will handle concerns regarding the offset. * * * * * (i) * * * (3) Generally, the disbursing official is not responsible for refunding money to debtors. The creditor agency shall notify FMS any time the creditor agency returns all or any part of an offset payment to an affected payee. See paragraph (d)(10)(v) of this section. FMS and the creditor agency shall adjust the debtor records appropriately. * * * * * Richard L. Gregg, Commissioner. [FR Doc. 05–1051 Filed 1–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–35–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD09–04–140] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zones; Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing permanent safety zones on a portion of Lake Ontario. These safety zones are necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with fireworks displays. These safety zones restrict vessel traffic from portions of Lake Ontario, New York, during annual fireworks displays. DATES: This rule is effective February 22, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 3145 being available in the docket, are part of docket CGD9–02–009 and are available for inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd., Buffalo, NY 14203 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Craig A. Wyatt, U.S. Coast Guard MSO Buffalo, (716) 843–9570. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Information On May 10, 2002, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal Register proposing 14 safety zones for annual firework displays in the Captain of the Port Buffalo zone (67 FR 31747). We received no comments on the proposal. No public hearing was requested, and none held. Background and Purpose On May 10, 2002, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal Register proposing 14 safety zones for annual firework displays in the Captain of the Port Buffalo zone (67 FR 31747). We proposed these safety zones to control vessel traffic within the immediate location of the fireworks launching area during annual fireworks displays. The Coast Guard received no comments in response to this NPRM. On May 3, 2004, the Coast Guard published a supplement to the proposed regulation (69 FR 24112–1), which removed twelve events that were proposed in the NPRM, added four new events (Ontario Memorial Day Fireworks, Ontario, NY; Olcott Fireworks, Olcott, NY; Harbor Sound and Light Festival, Sackets Harbor, NY; Village of Sackets Harbor July 4 Display, Sackets Harbor, NY), and revised the location and time of two events (Oswego Independence Day Fireworks, and Oswego Harborfest Fireworks Display). This final rule establishes 6 permanent safety zones that will be enforced for marine events occurring annually at the same location. Based on recent accidents that have occurred in other Captain of the Port zones, and the explosive hazard associated with these events, the Captain of the Port has determined that fireworks launched in close proximity to watercraft pose a significant risk to public safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers of inexperienced recreational boaters, congested waterways, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, alcohol use, and debris falling into the water could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities. Establishing a safety zone to control vessel movement E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM 21JAR1 3146 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 13 / Friday, January 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations in the vicinity of these marine event locations will help ensure the safety of persons and property at these events and help minimize the associated risk. Establishing permanent safety zones provides better notice than promulgating temporary rules annually, and decreases the amount of annual paperwork required for these events. The Coast Guard has not previously received notice of any impact caused by safety zones created for these events in the past. Discussion of Comments and Changes The Coast Guard received no comments regarding the proposed rulemaking. Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under that order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will be restricted from the zones, and all of the zones are in areas where the Coast Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zones? activation. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of commercial vessels intending to transit a portion of an activated safety zone. These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The safety zones are only enforced for a few hours on the VerDate jul<14>2003 12:09 Jan 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 day of the event on an annual basis. Vessel traffic can safely pass outside the safety zones during the events. In cases where traffic congestion is greater than expected or blocks shipping channels, with the permission of the Captain of the Port Buffalo, traffic may be allowed to pass through the safety zones under Coast Guard or assisting agency escort. Before the annual enforcement period, the Coast Guard will publish a notice of implementation of regulation in the Federal Register, and will issue maritime advisories in the Ninth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners, Marine Information Broadcasts and facsimile broadcasts— forums widely available to users who might be in the affected area. Additionally, the Coast Guard has not received any negative reports from small entities affected during these displays in previous years. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– 121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact Marine Safety Office Buffalo (see ADDRESSES). Small businesses may send comments on actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency?s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule does not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM 21JAR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 13 / Friday, January 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This rule fits the category from paragraph (34)(g) because it establishes a security zone. Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’ are not required for this rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. I For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation no. 0170.1. I 2. Add § 165.914 to read as follows: § 165.914 Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone. (a) Safety zones. The following areas are designated safety zones: (1) Oswego Independence Day Fireworks, Oswego, NY. (i) Location. All waters of Oswego Harbor, in Lake Ontario, within a 1,000- VerDate jul<14>2003 12:35 Jan 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 foot radius of the fireworks barge moored or anchored in approximate position 43°28′05″ N, 076°31′01″ W (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. The first Sunday in July. (2) Oswego Harborfest Fireworks Display, Oswego, NY. (i) Location. (A) All waters of Oswego Harbor within a 300-yard radius around the fireworks barge located at 43°28′08″ N, 076°31′07″ W (NAD 1983). (B) All waters surrounding the fireworks display on the western break wall; 43°27′55″ N, 076°31′30″ W then to 43°28′03″ N, 076°31′12″ W then to 43°27′54″ N, 076°31′06″ W then to 43°27′48″ N, 076°31′26″ W then back to the point of origin (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. The last Saturday during the last full week of July. (3) Ontario Memorial Day Fireworks, Ontario, NY. (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 200-yard radius of the fireworks display at Bear Creek Harbor located in position 43°16′39″ N, 077°16′35″ W (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. Memorial Day, the last Monday in May. (4) Olcott Fireworks, Olcott, NY. (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 300-yard radius of the fireworks display on the west break wall of the Olcott Harbor entrance located in position 43°20′25″ N, 078°43′09″ W (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. July 3. (5) Harbor Sound and Light Festival, Sackets Harbor, NY. (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 300-yard radius of the fireworks display on the beach just southwest of Mill Creek located in position 43°57′18″ N, 076°06′35″ W (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. The second Saturday in June. (6) Village of Sackets Harbor July 4 Display, Sackets Harbor, NY. (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 200-yard radius of the fireworks display on the beach of Battlefield State Park located in position 43°56′56″ N, 076°07′43″ W (NAD 1983). (ii) Enforcement date. July 4. (b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply. (2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol personnel. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 3147 other means, the operator shall proceed as directed. (3) Commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port Buffalo to transit the safety zone. Approval will be made on a case-bycase basis. Requests must be made in advance and approved by the Captain of the Port before transits will be authorized. The Captain of the Port may be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Group Buffalo on Channel 16, VHF–FM. (4) Marine Event Permits (CG–4423) will still need to be sent to U.S. Coast Guard Group Buffalo, NY. (c) Notice of annual enforcement period. The Captain of the Port Buffalo will publish, at least 10 days in advance of each annual event, a notice of implementation of regulation in the Federal Register. The COTP may also issue notices in the Ninth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners the dates and times this section will be enforced each year. Dated: November 15, 2004. P.M. Gugg, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo. [FR Doc. 05–1103 Filed 1–19–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Research and Special Programs Administration 49 CFR Part 192 [Docket No. RSPA–99–6106; Amdt. 192–94] RIN 2137–AD35 Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates to Pipeline Safety Regulations Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT. ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This direct final rule makes a minor editorial correction to the definition of ‘‘transmission line’’ in the Federal safety regulations for natural gas pipelines. The correction is intended to clarify that gathering lines are excluded from the definition of transmission line. Because gathering lines have never been included in the definition of transmission line, the correction will not result in any substantive change in the definition. DATES: This direct final rule goes into effect on May 6, 2005. If the Research and Special Programs Administration’s Office of Pipeline Safety (RSPA/OPS) E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM 21JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 13 (Friday, January 21, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3145-3147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD09-04-140]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zones; Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing permanent safety zones on a 
portion of Lake Ontario. These safety zones are necessary to ensure the 
safety of spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with 
fireworks displays. These safety zones restrict vessel traffic from 
portions of Lake Ontario, New York, during annual fireworks displays.

DATES: This rule is effective February 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of docket CGD9-02-009 and are available for inspection or 
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann 
Blvd., Buffalo, NY 14203 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Craig A. Wyatt, U.S. Coast Guard 
MSO Buffalo, (716) 843-9570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On May 10, 2002, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal 
Register proposing 14 safety zones for annual firework displays in the 
Captain of the Port Buffalo zone (67 FR 31747). We received no comments 
on the proposal. No public hearing was requested, and none held.

Background and Purpose

    On May 10, 2002, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal 
Register proposing 14 safety zones for annual firework displays in the 
Captain of the Port Buffalo zone (67 FR 31747). We proposed these 
safety zones to control vessel traffic within the immediate location of 
the fireworks launching area during annual fireworks displays. The 
Coast Guard received no comments in response to this NPRM.
    On May 3, 2004, the Coast Guard published a supplement to the 
proposed regulation (69 FR 24112-1), which removed twelve events that 
were proposed in the NPRM, added four new events (Ontario Memorial Day 
Fireworks, Ontario, NY; Olcott Fireworks, Olcott, NY; Harbor Sound and 
Light Festival, Sackets Harbor, NY; Village of Sackets Harbor July 4 
Display, Sackets Harbor, NY), and revised the location and time of two 
events (Oswego Independence Day Fireworks, and Oswego Harborfest 
Fireworks Display). This final rule establishes 6 permanent safety 
zones that will be enforced for marine events occurring annually at the 
same location.
    Based on recent accidents that have occurred in other Captain of 
the Port zones, and the explosive hazard associated with these events, 
the Captain of the Port has determined that fireworks launched in close 
proximity to watercraft pose a significant risk to public safety and 
property. The likely combination of large numbers of inexperienced 
recreational boaters, congested waterways, darkness punctuated by 
bright flashes of light, alcohol use, and debris falling into the water 
could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities. Establishing a 
safety zone to control vessel movement

[[Page 3146]]

in the vicinity of these marine event locations will help ensure the 
safety of persons and property at these events and help minimize the 
associated risk.
    Establishing permanent safety zones provides better notice than 
promulgating temporary rules annually, and decreases the amount of 
annual paperwork required for these events. The Coast Guard has not 
previously received notice of any impact caused by safety zones created 
for these events in the past.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The Coast Guard received no comments regarding the proposed 
rulemaking.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. The 
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under that 
order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and 
procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the 
economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory 
Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is 
unnecessary.
    This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will 
be restricted from the zones, and all of the zones are in areas where 
the Coast Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from 
the zones? activation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: The owners or operators of commercial vessels 
intending to transit a portion of an activated safety zone.
    These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The 
safety zones are only enforced for a few hours on the day of the event 
on an annual basis. Vessel traffic can safely pass outside the safety 
zones during the events.
    In cases where traffic congestion is greater than expected or 
blocks shipping channels, with the permission of the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo, traffic may be allowed to pass through the safety zones 
under Coast Guard or assisting agency escort. Before the annual 
enforcement period, the Coast Guard will publish a notice of 
implementation of regulation in the Federal Register, and will issue 
maritime advisories in the Ninth Coast Guard District Local Notice to 
Mariners, Marine Information Broadcasts and facsimile broadcasts--
forums widely available to users who might be in the affected area. 
Additionally, the Coast Guard has not received any negative reports 
from small entities affected during these displays in previous years.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule will 
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction 
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for 
compliance, please contact Marine Safety Office Buffalo (see 
ADDRESSES).
    Small businesses may send comments on actions of Federal employees 
who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency?s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule does not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not 
concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions

[[Page 3147]]

Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further 
environmental documentation. This rule fits the category from paragraph 
(34)(g) because it establishes a security zone.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an 
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion 
Determination'' are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L. 
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
no. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.914 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.914  Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo Zone.

    (a) Safety zones. The following areas are designated safety zones:
    (1) Oswego Independence Day Fireworks, Oswego, NY.
    (i) Location. All waters of Oswego Harbor, in Lake Ontario, within 
a 1,000-foot radius of the fireworks barge moored or anchored in 
approximate position 43[deg]28'05'' N, 076[deg]31'01'' W (NAD 1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. The first Sunday in July.
    (2) Oswego Harborfest Fireworks Display, Oswego, NY.
    (i) Location. (A) All waters of Oswego Harbor within a 300-yard 
radius around the fireworks barge located at 43[deg]28'08'' N, 
076[deg]31'07'' W (NAD 1983).
    (B) All waters surrounding the fireworks display on the western 
break wall; 43[deg]27'55'' N, 076[deg]31'30'' W then to 43[deg]28'03'' 
N, 076[deg]31'12'' W then to 43[deg]27'54'' N, 076[deg]31'06'' W then 
to 43[deg]27'48'' N, 076[deg]31'26'' W then back to the point of origin 
(NAD 1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. The last Saturday during the last full week 
of July.
    (3) Ontario Memorial Day Fireworks, Ontario, NY.
    (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 200-yard radius 
of the fireworks display at Bear Creek Harbor located in position 
43[deg]16'39'' N, 077[deg]16'35'' W (NAD 1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. Memorial Day, the last Monday in May.
    (4) Olcott Fireworks, Olcott, NY.
    (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 300-yard radius 
of the fireworks display on the west break wall of the Olcott Harbor 
entrance located in position 43[deg]20'25'' N, 078[deg]43'09'' W (NAD 
1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. July 3.
    (5) Harbor Sound and Light Festival, Sackets Harbor, NY.
    (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 300-yard radius 
of the fireworks display on the beach just southwest of Mill Creek 
located in position 43[deg]57'18'' N, 076[deg]06'35'' W (NAD 1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. The second Saturday in June.
    (6) Village of Sackets Harbor July 4 Display, Sackets Harbor, NY.
    (i) Location. All waters of Lake Ontario within a 200-yard radius 
of the fireworks display on the beach of Battlefield State Park located 
in position 43[deg]56'56'' N, 076[deg]07'43'' W (NAD 1983).
    (ii) Enforcement date. July 4.
    (b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 
165.23 apply.
    (2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of 
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol 
personnel. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, 
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by a U.S. 
Coast Guard vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, 
the operator shall proceed as directed.
    (3) Commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo to transit the safety zone. Approval will be made on a 
case-by-case basis. Requests must be made in advance and approved by 
the Captain of the Port before transits will be authorized. The Captain 
of the Port may be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Group Buffalo on 
Channel 16, VHF-FM.
    (4) Marine Event Permits (CG-4423) will still need to be sent to 
U.S. Coast Guard Group Buffalo, NY.
    (c) Notice of annual enforcement period. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo will publish, at least 10 days in advance of each annual event, 
a notice of implementation of regulation in the Federal Register. The 
COTP may also issue notices in the Ninth Coast Guard District Local 
Notice to Mariners the dates and times this section will be enforced 
each year.

    Dated: November 15, 2004.
P.M. Gugg,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 05-1103 Filed 1-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.