The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company-Acquisition and Operation Exemption-State of South Dakota, 3100-3101 [05-1011]

Agencies

• Surface Transportation Board
• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3100-3101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34645]


The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--Acquisition 
and Operation Exemption--State of South Dakota

    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), a 
Class I rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 
CFR 1150.31 to

[[Page 3101]]

acquire and operate approximately 369.7 route miles of railroad lines, 
referred to as the ``Core Lines,'' that are owned by the State of South 
Dakota (the State). These lines, which are described in a July 10, 1986 
Operating Agreement between a BNSF predecessor (Burlington Northern 
Railroad Company) and the State, extend principally: between milepost 
(MP) 777.0 near Aberdeen, SD, and MP 650.6 near Mitchell, SD; between 
MP 518.9 near Sioux City, IA, and MP 649.7 near Mitchell, SD; between 
MP 293.1 near Canton, SD, and MP 650.6 near Mitchell, SD; \1\ between 
MPs 74.1 and 68.8 in Sioux Falls, SD; between MP 68.8 near Sioux Falls, 
SD, and MP 49.4 near Canton, SD; and between MPs 511.9 and 518.9 in 
Sioux City, IA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The distance between MP 293.1 near Canton and MP 650.6 near 
Mitchell is approximately 81.50 miles. See BNSF's Sec.  1150.31 
notice, Exhibit 2, Appendix 1, page 6. BNSF has not explained the 
discrepancy with respect to the milepost designations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Core Lines were once part of the rail system operated by the 
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (the 
Milwaukee Road). The Milwaukee Road entered bankruptcy in 1977, and, in 
1980, it received, both from the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) 
and from the bankruptcy court, approval to abandon the Core Lines. In 
1981, the abandoned Core Lines were acquired by the State, and, since 
on or about July 6, 1981, BNSF has provided common carrier rail service 
over the Core Lines pursuant to various agreements (the most recent of 
which is the 1986 Operating Agreement) with the State, and pursuant to 
a Modified Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (the 
modified certificate) issued by the ICC. See 49 CFR part 1150, subpart 
C (Sec.  1150.21 et seq.) (these are the ``modified certificate'' 
regulations that apply to operations over abandoned rail lines that 
have been acquired, through purchase or lease, by a State). BNSF 
contends that it has, under the terms of the 1986 Operating Agreement, 
a right to acquire the Core Lines from the State.
    Because the Core Lines were abandoned by the Milwaukee Road, BNSF 
has invoked the notice of exemption procedures at 49 CFR part 1150, 
subpart D (Sec.  1150.31 et seq.) (these are the regulations that apply 
to acquisitions and operations under Sec.  10901). See The Burlington 
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Lac Qui Parle Regional Railroad Authority, STB Finance 
Docket No. 33364 (STB served Apr. 15, 1997); Burlington Northern 
Railroad Company--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--South Dakota 
Railroad Authority, Finance Docket No. 32017 (ICC served Apr. 2, 1992).
    Under the modified certificate regulations at Sec.  1150.21 et 
seq., a modified certificate operator may not terminate modified 
certificate service unless it first provides--to the State, to the 
Board, and to all persons that have used the line within the preceding 
six months--60 days' notice. See 49 CFR 1150.24. BNSF has not yet 
provided such notice, but it has stated that, once it has acquired the 
Core Lines, it will notify the appropriate parties that it will cease 
to provide service under its Sec.  1150.21 modified certificate but 
will continue to provide service pursuant to its Sec.  1150.31 
exemption notice.
    BNSF's Sec.  1150.31 exemption notice was filed to be effective on 
December 30, 2004. However, by decision served December 29, 2004, the 
effective date of the exemption was stayed until 11:59 p.m., January 
14, 2005. The question of whether the exemption will be stayed beyond 
that date will be addressed by the Board in a separate decision.
    As noted in the decision served December 29, 2004, in this docket, 
BNSF's asserted right to acquire the Core Lines is disputed by the 
State, and is now the subject of litigation in The Burlington Northern 
and Santa Fe Railway Company v. State of South Dakota, Civ. No. 04-470 
(S.D. 6th Circuit). As is also noted in the prior decision, BNSF has 
acknowledged that, before it can actually acquire title to the Core 
Lines, it will need to prevail in acquiring the Core Lines from the 
State whether through voluntary conveyance by the State or involuntary 
conveyance as may be ordered by the state court. In view of the ongoing 
litigation concerning BNSF's right, under the terms of the 1986 
Operating Agreement, to acquire the Core Lines from the State, it is 
appropriate to note that the Board has made no determination, one way 
or the other, concerning BNSF's asserted right to acquire the Core 
Lines from the State. The contractual dispute respecting the scope of 
the rights retained by or granted to the State and/or BNSF under the 
1986 Operating Agreement must be resolved in a court of competent 
jurisdiction.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34645, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on BNSF's representative: Adrian 
L. Steel, Jr., Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, 1909 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20006-1101.
    Board decisions and notices are available on its Web site at http:/
/www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: January 12, 2005.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-1011 Filed 1-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P