Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Received, 2697-2699 [05-795]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices Conformity Determination (DGCD) and Draft Section 106 Historic Resources Report will be available for public review beginning January 21, 2005. The DEIS details the proposed development of two new runways, terminal facilities, and related facilities at Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD), Dulles, Virginia. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is a cooperating federal agency, having jurisdiction by law because the proposed federal action has the potential for significant wetland impacts. The DEIS presents the purpose and need for the proposed project, a comprehensive analysis of the alternatives to the proposed project, including the no-action alternative and potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed development of two new air carrier runways and related improvements at IAD. In accordance with section 176(c) of the Federal Clean Air Act, FAA has assessed whether the air emissions that would result from FAA’s action in approving the proposed projects conform with the State Implementation Plan (SIP). This assessment is contained in the Draft Air Quality General Conformity Determination. Pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, this project is being evaluated for consistency with the Virginia Coastal Program. Section 306(d)(14) of the CZMA requires public participation in the Federal consistency review process. The Public Workshops/Hearings are also being conducted pursuant to MWAA’s 1987 Programmatic Memorandum of Agreement with the Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer and the Adivosry Council on Historic Preservation (as regards Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966–36 CFR 800). The FAA encourages all interested parties to provide comments concerning the scope and content of the DEIS, Draft Air Quality General Conformity Determination and Draft Section 106 Historic Resources Report. Comments should be as specific as possible and address the analysis of potential environmental impacts and the adequacy of the proposed action or merits of alternatives and the mitigation being considered. Reviewers should organize their participation so that it is meaningful and makes the agencies aware of the viewer’s interests and concerns using quotations and other specific references to the text of the DEIS and related documents. Matters that could have been raised with VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 specificity during the DEIS comment period may not be considered if they are raised later in the decision making process. This commenting procedure is intended to ensure that substantive comments and concerns are made available to the FAA in a timely manner so that the FAA has an opportunity to address them. Comments from interested parties on the DEIS and related documents are encouraged and may be presented verbally or in writing at the Public Information Meetings and/or Public Hearings or may be submitted in writing to the FAA at the address listed in the section entitled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The comment period will close on March 7, 2005. 2697 Issued in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2005. Anthony F. Fazio, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Dispositions of Petitions Docket No.: FAA–2004–17186. Petitioner: Mr. John C. Kline. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Mr. John C. Kline to act as a pilot in operations conducted under part 121 after reaching his 60th birthday. Denial, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 8458. Docket No.: FAA–2003–14879. Petitioner: AFTA, Inc. (formerly Xtrajet, Inc.) Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.152(a). Issued in Dulles, Virginia, on January 7, Description of Relief Sought/ 2005. Disposition: To permit AFTA, Inc. Terry Page, (formerly Xtrajet, Inc.) to operate its Manager, Washington Airports District Office, Gulfstream G–1159 aircraft without Federal Aviation Administration. installing the flight data recorder [FR Doc. 05–855 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am] required by the regulation. Denial, 12/ BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 14/2004, Exemption No. 8044A Docket No.: FAA–2000–8436. Petitioner: William J. Hughes DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Technical Center. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 4 CFR Federal Aviation Administration 91.117(a), 91.119(c), 91.159(a), and 91.303(e). [Summary Notice No. PE–2005–4] Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit the William J. Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions Hughes Technical Center to conduct of Petitions Received flight operations in support of its research and development projects AGENCY: Federal Aviation without meeting certain Federal Administration (FAA), DOT. Aviation Administration regulations governing aircraft speed, minimum safe ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior altitudes, cruising altitudes for flights petitions. conducted under visual flight rules, and SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking aerobatic flight. Grant, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 6883C. provisions governing the application, Docket No.: FAA–2004–19151. processing, and disposition of petitions Petitioner: Middle Tennessee State for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code University. of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR notice contains the disposition of 61.65(a)(1). certain petitions previously received. Description of Relief Sought/ The purpose of this notice is to improve Disposition: To permit students enrolled the public’s awareness of, and in the Middle Tennessee State participation in, this aspect of FAA’s University FAA-approved pilot school regulatory activities. Neither publication curriculum that utilizes the FAA/ of this notice nor the inclusion or Industry Training Standards Private/ omission of information in the summary Instrument Syllabus for Technically is intended to affect the legal status of Advanced Piston Aircraft-Single Engine any petition or its final disposition. Land and who hold only a Student Pilot FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim certificate to take concurrently the Adams (202) 267–8033, or Sandy private pilot and instrument rating Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, practical tests, subject to certain Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/ Aviation Administration, 800 10/2004, Exemption No. 8456 Independence Avenue, SW., Docket No.: FAA–2004–19417. Washington, DC 20591. This notice is Petitioner: Lufthansa Cargo AG. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 61.77(a). 11.91. PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1 2698 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit pilots employed by Lufthansa Cargo AG to be eligible for the issuance of special purpose pilot authorizations under part 61, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 8437A Docket No.: FAA–2002–14105. Petitioner: Mr. Michael S. Friedman. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109(a). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Mr. Michael S. Friedman to conduct certain flight instruction and simulated instrument flights to meet the recent experience requirements in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air airplanes equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of functioning dual controls. Grant, 12/03/2004, Exemption No. 7950A Docket No.: FAA–2000–8179. Petitioner: M7 Aerospace LP. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.531(a)(3). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit M7 Aerospace LP (M7) to conduct production and experimental test flights in SA227–CC and SA227–DC Metro 23 airplanes without a pilot designated as a second in command (SIC). In addition, it permits all operators of M7 commuter category airplanes (SA227–C, SA227– DC, and other airplanes on the same type certificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated SIC, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot operations and is carrying nine or fewer passengers. Grant, 12/03/2004, Exemption No. 5367H Docket No.: FAA–2004–19517. Petitioner: Island Helicopter. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Island Helicopter to operate its Robinson R–22 helicopter under part 135 without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on those aircraft. Grant, 12/06/2004, Exemption No. 8454 Docket No.: FAA–2002–13966. Petitioner: St. Charles Flying Service, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Island Helicopter to operate its Robinson R–22 helicopter under part 135 without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on those aircraft. Grant, 12/06/2004, Exemption No. 8454. Docket No.: FAA–2002–13966. VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 Petitioner: St. Charles Flying Service, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit St. Charles Flying Service, Inc., to operate certain aircraft under part 135 without a TSO– C112 (Mode S) installed on those aircraft. Grant, 12/06/2004, Exemption No. 7929A. Docket No.: FAA–2004–19759. Petitioner: Dassault Aviation. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.344a and 135.152(h). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Dassault Aviations’ future operators of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy and Falcon 900EX EASy airplanes the ability to operate newly manufactured airplanes without three of the required flight recorder parameters fully operational. Denial, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 8459. Docket No.: FAA–2000–8419. Petitioner: Department of the United States Air Force. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.209(a)(1) and (b). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit the United States Air Force to conduct counternarcotics aircrew flight training operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic interdiction, without lighted aircraft position or anticollision lights. Grant, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 5305F. Docket No.: FAA–2001–9618. Petitioner: Department of the United States Air Force. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.209(a) and (b). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit the United States Air Force to conduct helicopter nightvision flight training operations without lighted aircraft position lights at or below 500 feet above ground level. Grant, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 5891D. Docket No.: FAA–2004–19718. Petitioner: Southern Air, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Southern Air, Inc., to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an Federal Aviation Administration inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 8464. Docket No.: FAA–2004–19692. PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Petitioner: Mission Mountain Flying Service. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Mission Mountain Flying Service to operate their aircraft, Registration No. N58441, Serial No. U20602604, with any TSO–C74b transponder or TSO–C74c transponder. Grant, 01/04/2005, Exemption No. 8466. Docket No.: FAA–2004–19926. Petitioner: Northern Air Cargo, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.356(a) and (c). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Northern Air Cargo, Inc., to operate one cargo Boeing 727 airplane, Registration No. N992AJ, Serial No. 19428, and one cargo Douglas DC–6 airplane, Registration No. N6174C, Serial No. 44075, from January 1, 2005 until February 1, 2005, that is not equipped with an approved TCAS II traffic alert and collision avoidance system and the appropriate class of Mode S transponder, subject to compliance with certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/30/2004, Exemption No. 8462. Docket No.: FAA–2004–19881. Petitioner: Mr. Edward J. Tarver III. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109(a). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Mr. Edward J. Tarver III to conduct certain flight training in certain Beechcraft Bonanza/ Debonair/Baron airplanes that equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 8465. Docket No.: FAA–2001–10267. Petitioner: Carver Aero, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.421(a). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Carver Aero, Inc., to operate a Piper PA–23–250 aircraft under part 135 without having overhauled the engine at the interval recommended by the manufacturer, as required by regulation. Denial, 12/29/ 2004, Exemption No. 8463. Docket No.: FAA–2000–8186. Petitioner: Sound Flight, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.203(a)(1). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Sound Flight, Inc., to conduct operations under visual flight rules at an altitude below 500 feet, over water, outside controlled airspace. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 6428D. Docket No.: FAA–2000–8009. Petitioner: Alaska Airlines, Inc. E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.44(a) and SFAR 58, paragraph 6(b)(3)(ii)(A). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit Alaska Airlines, Inc., to meet line check requirements using an alternative line check program. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 6043F. Docket No.: FAA–2001–8987. Petitioner: The Boeing Company. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.515(a)(1). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit the Boeing Company to conduct noise measurement tests, Ground Proximity Warning System research and development, and aircraft certification tests at altitudes less than 1,000 feet above the surface or 1,000 feet from any mountain, hill, or other obstruction outside of daytime only conditions, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 4783I. Docket No.: FAA–2000–7991. Petitioner: ATA Airlines, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii). Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit ATA Airlines, Inc., to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 7491B. [FR Doc. 05–795 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE–2005–5] Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received. AGENCY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking provisions governing the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions seeking relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR, dispositions of certain petitions previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. SUMMARY: VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition. DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before February 3, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket Number FAA–200X–XXXXX] by any of the following methods: • Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site. • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590– 001. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL– 401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Adams (202) 267–8033, Sandy Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2005. Anthony F. Fazio, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petitions for Exemption Docket No.: FAA–2004–19350. Petitioner: Aero Sports Connection, United States Ultralight Association, and North American Powered Parachute Federation. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 103.1(e)(1). Description of Relief Sought: To allow Aero Sports Connection, United States Ultralight Association, and North American Powered Parachute PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2699 Federation to conduct certain studies that would increase the 254 pounds (empty weight) limitation for ultralight vehicles. [FR Doc. 05–796 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Intent To Rule on Application 05–04–C–00–LYH To Impose and Use the Revenue From a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Lynchburg Regional Airport, Lynchburg, VA Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on application. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at Lynchburg Regional Airport (LYH) under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 40117 and part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 14, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Washington Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, Dulles, Virginia 20166. In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Mark Courtney, Airport Director, Lynchburg Regional Airport of the City of Lynchburg at the following address: City of Lynchburg, Lynchburg Regional Airport, 4308 Wards Road, Lynchburg, Virginia 24502. Air carriers and foreign air carriers may submit copies of written comments previously provided to the public agency full name under section 158.23 of part 158. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Terry J. Page, Manager, Washington Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, Dulles, Virginia 20166, Telephone: 703–661–1354. The application may be reviewed in person at this same location. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposes to rule and invites pubic comment on the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at Lynchburg Regional Airport under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 40117 and part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). On E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2697-2699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-4]


Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. The 
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and 
participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither 
publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information 
in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition 
or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Adams (202) 267-8033, or Sandy 
Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267-7271, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Dispositions of Petitions

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-17186.
    Petitioner: Mr. John C. Kline.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Mr. John C. 
Kline to act as a pilot in operations conducted under part 121 after 
reaching his 60th birthday. Denial, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 8458.

    Docket No.: FAA-2003-14879.
    Petitioner: AFTA, Inc. (formerly Xtrajet, Inc.)
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.152(a).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit AFTA, Inc. 
(formerly Xtrajet, Inc.) to operate its Gulfstream G-1159 aircraft 
without installing the flight data recorder required by the regulation. 
Denial, 12/14/2004, Exemption No. 8044A

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8436.
    Petitioner: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 4 CFR 91.117(a), 91.119(c), 91.159(a), 
and 91.303(e).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the William J. 
Hughes Technical Center to conduct flight operations in support of its 
research and development projects without meeting certain Federal 
Aviation Administration regulations governing aircraft speed, minimum 
safe altitudes, cruising altitudes for flights conducted under visual 
flight rules, and aerobatic flight. Grant, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 
6883C.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19151.
    Petitioner: Middle Tennessee State University.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 61.65(a)(1).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit students 
enrolled in the Middle Tennessee State University FAA-approved pilot 
school curriculum that utilizes the FAA/Industry Training Standards 
Private/Instrument Syllabus for Technically Advanced Piston Aircraft-
Single Engine Land and who hold only a Student Pilot certificate to 
take concurrently the private pilot and instrument rating practical 
tests, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/10/
2004, Exemption No. 8456

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19417.
    Petitioner: Lufthansa Cargo AG.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 61.77(a).

[[Page 2698]]

    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit pilots employed 
by Lufthansa Cargo AG to be eligible for the issuance of special 
purpose pilot authorizations under part 61, subject to certain 
conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/10/2004, Exemption No. 8437A

    Docket No.: FAA-2002-14105.
    Petitioner: Mr. Michael S. Friedman.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109(a).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Mr. Michael S. 
Friedman to conduct certain flight instruction and simulated instrument 
flights to meet the recent experience requirements in Beechcraft 
Bonanza, Baron, and Travel Air airplanes equipped with a functioning 
throwover control wheel in place of functioning dual controls. Grant, 
12/03/2004, Exemption No. 7950A

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8179.
    Petitioner: M7 Aerospace LP.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.531(a)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit M7 Aerospace LP 
(M7) to conduct production and experimental test flights in SA227-CC 
and SA227-DC Metro 23 airplanes without a pilot designated as a second 
in command (SIC). In addition, it permits all operators of M7 commuter 
category airplanes (SA227-C, SA227-DC, and other airplanes on the same 
type certificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated 
SIC, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot 
operations and is carrying nine or fewer passengers. Grant, 12/03/2004, 
Exemption No. 5367H

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19517.
    Petitioner: Island Helicopter.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Island 
Helicopter to operate its Robinson R-22 helicopter under part 135 
without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on those aircraft. 
Grant, 12/06/2004, Exemption No. 8454

    Docket No.: FAA-2002-13966.
    Petitioner: St. Charles Flying Service, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Island 
Helicopter to operate its Robinson R-22 helicopter under part 135 
without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on those aircraft. 
Grant, 12/06/2004, Exemption No. 8454.

    Docket No.: FAA-2002-13966.
    Petitioner: St. Charles Flying Service, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit St. Charles 
Flying Service, Inc., to operate certain aircraft under part 135 
without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) installed on those aircraft. Grant, 12/06/
2004, Exemption No. 7929A.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19759.
    Petitioner: Dassault Aviation.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.344a and 135.152(h).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Dassault 
Aviations' future operators of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy and 
Falcon 900EX EASy airplanes the ability to operate newly manufactured 
airplanes without three of the required flight recorder parameters 
fully operational. Denial, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 8459.

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8419.
    Petitioner: Department of the United States Air Force.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.209(a)(1) and (b).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the United 
States Air Force to conduct counternarcotics aircrew flight training 
operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic 
interdiction, without lighted aircraft position or anticollision 
lights. Grant, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 5305F.

    Docket No.: FAA-2001-9618.
    Petitioner: Department of the United States Air Force.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.209(a) and (b).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the United 
States Air Force to conduct helicopter night-vision flight training 
operations without lighted aircraft position lights at or below 500 
feet above ground level. Grant, 12/23/2004, Exemption No. 5891D.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19718.
    Petitioner: Southern Air, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Southern Air, 
Inc., to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of 
an Federal Aviation Administration inspector to observe a qualifying 
pilot in command who is completing initial or upgrade training 
specified in Sec.  121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes 
a takeoff and a landing. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 8464.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19692.
    Petitioner: Mission Mountain Flying Service.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Mission 
Mountain Flying Service to operate their aircraft, Registration No. 
N58441, Serial No. U20602604, with any TSO-C74b transponder or TSO-C74c 
transponder. Grant, 01/04/2005, Exemption No. 8466.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19926.
    Petitioner: Northern Air Cargo, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.356(a) and (c).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Northern Air 
Cargo, Inc., to operate one cargo Boeing 727 airplane, Registration No. 
N992AJ, Serial No. 19428, and one cargo Douglas DC-6 airplane, 
Registration No. N6174C, Serial No. 44075, from January 1, 2005 until 
February 1, 2005, that is not equipped with an approved TCAS II traffic 
alert and collision avoidance system and the appropriate class of Mode 
S transponder, subject to compliance with certain conditions and 
limitations. Grant, 12/30/2004, Exemption No. 8462.

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-19881.
    Petitioner: Mr. Edward J. Tarver III.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.109(a).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Mr. Edward J. 
Tarver III to conduct certain flight training in certain Beechcraft 
Bonanza/Debonair/Baron airplanes that equipped with a functioning 
throwover control wheel, subject to certain conditions and limitations. 
Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 8465.

    Docket No.: FAA-2001-10267.
    Petitioner: Carver Aero, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.421(a).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Carver Aero, 
Inc., to operate a Piper PA-23-250 aircraft under part 135 without 
having overhauled the engine at the interval recommended by the 
manufacturer, as required by regulation. Denial, 12/29/2004, Exemption 
No. 8463.

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8186.
    Petitioner: Sound Flight, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.203(a)(1).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Sound Flight, 
Inc., to conduct operations under visual flight rules at an altitude 
below 500 feet, over water, outside controlled airspace. Grant, 12/29/
2004, Exemption No. 6428D.

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8009.
    Petitioner: Alaska Airlines, Inc.

[[Page 2699]]

    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.44(a) and SFAR 58, paragraph 
6(b)(3)(ii)(A).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Alaska 
Airlines, Inc., to meet line check requirements using an alternative 
line check program. Grant, 12/29/2004, Exemption No. 6043F.

    Docket No.: FAA-2001-8987.
    Petitioner: The Boeing Company.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.515(a)(1).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the Boeing 
Company to conduct noise measurement tests, Ground Proximity Warning 
System research and development, and aircraft certification tests at 
altitudes less than 1,000 feet above the surface or 1,000 feet from any 
mountain, hill, or other obstruction outside of daytime only 
conditions, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Grant, 12/
29/2004, Exemption No. 4783I.

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-7991.
    Petitioner: ATA Airlines, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit ATA Airlines, 
Inc., to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing 
initial or upgrade training specified in Sec.  121.424 during at least 
one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. Grant, 12/29/
2004, Exemption No. 7491B.

[FR Doc. 05-795 Filed 1-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.