Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Competition Requirements; Correction, 2361 [05-760]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
should also include the following
phrase ‘‘Disk Copy—Not an Original.’’
Each diskette should contain only one
party’s pleadings, preferably in a single
electronic file. In addition, commenters
must send diskette copies to the
Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals
II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to
section 1.1206 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.1206, this proceeding
will be conducted as a permit-butdisclose proceeding in which ex parte
communications are subject to
disclosure. The full text of this
document and copies of any
subsequently filed documents in this
matter will be available for public
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
and copies of subsequently filed
documents in this matters may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contract, BCPI, Inc., Portals
II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. Customers may
contact BCPI, Inc. at their Web site
https://www.bcpiweb.com or call 1–800–
378–3160. To request materials in
accessible formats for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an
e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY). This document can
also be downloaded in Word or Portable
Document Format (PDF) at: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro.
Synopsis
In the June 17, 2003 Second Improved
TRS Order, the Commission required
that TRS providers offer three-way
calling as a standard feature of TRS. In
the August 1, 2003 Declaratory Ruling,
the Commission recognized captioned
telephone service as a type of TRS. (See
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, published at 68 FR 55898,
September 29, 2003, in CC Docket No.
98–67; FCC 03–190. The Declaratory
Ruling did not waive the requirement
that providers of captioned telephone
service offer a three-way calling feature.
On September 24, 2003, AT&T Corp.
(AT&T) filed a petition for limited
reconsideration of the Second Improved
TRS Order. (See AT&T, AT&T Petition
for Limited Reconsideration and for
Waiver, CC Docket No. 98–67, CG
Docket No. 03–123 (filed September 24,
2003)). AT&T requested that the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:42 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Commission waive the three-way calling
requirement adopted in the Second
Improved TRS Order. AT&T asserted
that it was not possible for the TRS
facility to set up a three-way call,
subject to clarification regarding how
three-way calling may be provided in
compliance with the Commission’s TRS
regulations. On December 11, 2003,
Ultratec, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
filed a petition seeking clarification that
the three-way calling requirement either
does not apply to captioned telephone
service or that a TRS provider complies
with the rule regardless of the method
used to set up the three-way call. (See
Petition for Clarification by Ultratec,
Inc. and Sprint Corporation, CC Docket
No. 98–67, CG Docket No. 03–123 (file
December 11, 2003)). On February 24,
2004, in response to these petitions, the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau released an Order waiving for
one year the requirement that TRS
providers (including providers of
captioned telephone service) offer threeway calling. (Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services
for Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, CC Docket 98–67, DA 04–
465, 19 FCC Rcd 2993 (February 24,
2004)). In view of the pending
expiration date of the one-year February
24, 2004, waiver, the Commission now
seek comment on whether this waiver
should be left to expire or be extended,
or whether the rule should be modified
or clarified and, if so, how.
Federal Communications Commission.
Jay Keithley,
Deputy Chief, Consumer & Governmental
Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05–651 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 206
2361
Regulations System,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132,
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0311;
facsimile (703) 602–0350.
Correction
PART 206—[CORRECTED]
In the issue of Wednesday, December
15, 2004, on page 74991, in the second
column, amendatory instruction 2 is
corrected to read as follows:
I 2. Section 206.001 is revised to read as
follows:
I
206.001
Applicability.
(b) As authorized by 10 U.S.C. 1091,
contracts awarded to individuals using
the procedures at 237.104(b)(ii) are
exempt from the competitive
requirements of FAR part 6.
(S–70) Also excepted from this part
are follow-on production contracts for
products developed pursuant to the
‘‘other transactions’’ authority of 10
U.S.C. 2371 for prototype projects
when—
(1) The other transaction agreement
includes provisions for a follow-on
production contract;
(2) The contracting officer receives
sufficient information from the
agreements officer and the project
manager for the prototype other
transaction agreement, which
documents that the conditions set forth
in 10 U.S.C. 2371 note, subsections (f)(2)
(A) and (B) (see 32 CFR 3.9(d)), have
been met; and
(3) The contracting officer establishes
quantities and prices for the follow-on
production contract that do not exceed
the quantities and target prices
established in the other transaction
agreement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
[FR Doc. 05–760 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
[DFARS Case 2003–D017]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Competition
Requirements; Correction
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Correction to final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a correction to
the final rule published at 69 FR 74990–
74991 on December 15, 2004, pertaining
to competition requirements. The
correction shows that the change to 48
CFR part 206, section 206.001, revises
only paragraph (b) of section 206.001.
EFFECTIVE DATES: December 15, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Michele Peterson, Defense Acquisition
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
[DFARS Case 2004–D013]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Free Trade
Agreements—Australia and Morocco
Department of Defense (DoD).
Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DoD has issued an interim
rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-760]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 206
[DFARS Case 2003-D017]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Competition
Requirements; Correction
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Correction to final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a correction to the final rule published at 69
FR 74990-74991 on December 15, 2004, pertaining to competition
requirements. The correction shows that the change to 48 CFR part 206,
section 206.001, revises only paragraph (b) of section 206.001.
Effective Dates: December 15, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Michele Peterson, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0311;
facsimile (703) 602-0350.
Correction
PART 206--[CORRECTED]
0
In the issue of Wednesday, December 15, 2004, on page 74991, in the
second column, amendatory instruction 2 is corrected to read as
follows:
0
2. Section 206.001 is revised to read as follows:
206.001 Applicability.
(b) As authorized by 10 U.S.C. 1091, contracts awarded to
individuals using the procedures at 237.104(b)(ii) are exempt from the
competitive requirements of FAR part 6.
(S-70) Also excepted from this part are follow-on production
contracts for products developed pursuant to the ``other transactions''
authority of 10 U.S.C. 2371 for prototype projects when--
(1) The other transaction agreement includes provisions for a
follow-on production contract;
(2) The contracting officer receives sufficient information from
the agreements officer and the project manager for the prototype other
transaction agreement, which documents that the conditions set forth in
10 U.S.C. 2371 note, subsections (f)(2) (A) and (B) (see 32 CFR
3.9(d)), have been met; and
(3) The contracting officer establishes quantities and prices for
the follow-on production contract that do not exceed the quantities and
target prices established in the other transaction agreement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 05-760 Filed 1-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
