Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated Authority, 2404-2405 [05-653]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2404
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Notices
located in the EPA Docket Center, is
(202) 566–0280.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under theFederal Register listings
athttps://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. The
documents referenced in Unit I.B.1 are
also accessible through the EPA Internet
athttps://www.epa.gov/opptintr/
chemtest/dnt/index.htm. To access the
OPPTS Harmonized Test Guideline
referenced in this document, go directly
to the guideline at https://www.epa.gov/
opptsfrs/home/guidelin.htm/.
In addition, an electronic version of
the public docket is available through
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system, EPA Dockets. You
may use EPA Dockets at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/ to access the
index listing of the contents of the
official public docket and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides,
Toxic substances, Test guidelines.
Dated: January 3, 2005.
Susan B. Hazen,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. 05–711 Filed 1–12–05 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice of Meeting
Farm Credit System Insurance
Corporation Board; Regular Meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
regular meeting of the Farm Credit
System Insurance Corporation Board
(Board).
The meeting of the Board
will be held at the offices of the Farm
Credit Administration in McLean,
Virginia, on January 13, 2005, from 10
a.m. until such time as the Board
concludes its business.
DATE AND TIME:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the
Farm Credit System Insurance
Corporation Board, (703) 883–4009,
TTY (703) 883–4056.
Farm Credit System
Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm
Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.
ADDRESSES:
This
meeting of the Board will be open to the
public (limited space available. In order
to increase the accessibility to Board
meetings, persons requiring assistance
should make arrangements in advance.
The matters to be considered at the
meeting are:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Open Session
A. Approval of Minutes
• December 2, 2004 (Regular Meeting)
New Business
• Review of Insurance Premium Rates
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
This action announces the availability
of EPA’s response to the petition. The
public may access both the petition and
EPA’s response as described in Unit I.B.
of this document.
Dated: January 7, 2005.
Jeanette C. Brinkley,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance
Corporation Board.
[FR Doc. 05–686 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:46 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
January 6, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law No. 104–
13. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested
concerning (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the propeer performance of the
functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before March 14, 2005.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) comments to
Cathy Williams, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C823, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20554 or via the Internet to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contract Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918 or via the
Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0996.
Title: AM Auction Section 307(b)
Submissions.
Form Number: Not applicable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Notices
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 450.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.5–3
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,100 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $132,500.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: Section 307(b) of the
Communications Act, as amended,
requires that the Commission effect a
fair, efficient and equitable distribution
of radio stations throughout the United
States. In the context of competitive
bidding application processing, Section
307(b) is relevant when a mutually
exclusive AM application group
consists of applications to serve
different communities, or when a nonmutually exclusive AM application
proposes a community of license
change. Such applications must submit
supplemental information addressing
Section 307(b) criteria. The data
submitted will be used to determine the
community having the greater need for
an AM radio service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–653 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–10–M
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[CC Docket No. 94–102; DA 04–3874]
State Actions To Achieve Effective
Deployment of E911 Capabilities for
Multi-Line Telephone Systems (MLTSs)
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of
comments.
AGENCY:
Status of State Action
SUMMARY: This document solicits
comments about the progress made by
the states in implementing E911
solutions for multi-line telephone
systems (MLTSs). The Commission
committed to releasing a public notice
on this issue in its previous documents
that revised the scope of the enhanced
911 rules to clarify which technologies
and services will be required to be
capable of transmitting enhanced 911
information to Public Safety Answering
Points (PSAPs).
DATES: Comments are due on or before
February 28, 2005. Reply comments are
due on or before March 29, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:46 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington DC 20554. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further
filing instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Michael Goldstein, Wireline
Competition Bureau, (202) 418–0806,
michael.goldstein@fcc.gov; or Cathy
Zima, Wireline Competition Bureau,
(202) 418–7380, cathy.zima@fcc.gov.
Users of TTY equipment, call (202) 418–
0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
public notice solicits comment about
the progress made by the states in
implementing E911 solutions for multiline telephone systems (MLTSs). When
an emergency (i.e., 911) call is placed
from a station served by an MLTS, the
Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)
receiving the call will not always be
able to identify the office, dormitory
room or other detailed location of the
caller. This problem is well known and
has been a subject of several
Commission proceedings. In its Report
and Order and Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Final rule; 69 FR
6578, February 11, 2004, and Proposed
rule; 69 FR 6595, February 11, 2004, the
Commission was concerned that ‘‘the
lack of effective implementation of
MLTS E911 could be an unacceptable
gap in the emergency call system’’ but
declined to adopt federal rules to
address this issue, because the record
demonstrated that state and local
governments are in a better position to
devise such rules for their jurisdictions.
Expecting the ‘‘states to act
expeditiously in this area,’’ the
Commission committed to releasing a
public notice in a year to examine
states’ progress and announced its
intention to re-visit the E911-MLTS/
caller location issue depending on the
results of its evaluation of state action.
ADDRESSES:
Public sources indicate that
approximately twelve states have
adopted legislation addressing E911
requirements for MLTSs. These same
sources indicate that some state
regulatory commissions have
promulgated regulations addressing
these requirements. We seek public
comment about state-adopted statutes
and regulations, as well as about
proposals for action in this area that
may be currently under consideration
and the anticipated time frames for
conclusion of such proposals. We
specifically ask commenters to identify
and discuss state actions that may be
based on model legislation such as that
proposed by the National Emergency
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2405
Number Association (NENA) and the
Association of Public-Safety
Communications Officials (APCO).
More specifically, we ask commenters
to identify and discuss relevant state
activity by: (1) Specific identification
(citation) to a particular statute or
regulation, or proposed statute or
regulation, in each case; (2)
identification of any corresponding state
Web page where these activities are
presented or discussed; (3)
identification of the date any final
legislative or regulatory action became
effective or is expected to become
effective; (4) discussion of any
requirements placed on carriers, MLTS
equipment manufacturers, MLTS
operators, or any other persons; and (5)
discussion of how the statute and/or
regulation is enforced.
With regard to (4), commenters
should note whether any entities are
specifically exempted from adopted
requirements imposed by the legislation
or regulations and explain the criteria
for exemption. To the extent legislation
or regulation was proposed but not
ultimately adopted, we invite parties to
explain why such action was not taken,
such as cost concerns, technical
complexity, and the perceived lack of
demand or need for the proposed
requirements.
Use of Model Legislation
The Commission’s Report and Order
and Second Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking states: ‘‘we believe that the
Model Legislation submitted by NENA
and APCO offers the states a valuable
blueprint for their own laws,’’ and ‘‘we
strongly support the approach taken by
the model legislation.’’ With this view
of the model legislation, we request
information regarding how it has
affected efforts by the states to produce
their own statutes. In particular, please
describe how this model legislation has
been used in determining states’
approaches, how extensively this model
legislation has been and is being used,
and its perceived shortcomings.
In addition to use of this particular
model legislation, we invite comment as
to whether there are any other models
that states have found useful in
developing legislation, e.g., laws passed
in any other state. We ask commenters
to identify such examples and analyze
their possible utility for widespread use.
Carrier Services Provided Under State
Tariff
Although our primary focus is
evaluating state action addressing E911/
MLTS issues, we also seek comment on
the extent to which carriers and others
offer E911 solutions for MLTSs. It
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2404-2405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-653]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
January 6, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law No. 104-13. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the propeer performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before March 14, 2005. If you anticipate that you will
be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact
listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments to Cathy
Williams, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-C823, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 or via the Internet to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collection(s), contract Cathy Williams at (202) 418-
2918 or via the Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0996.
Title: AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions.
Form Number: Not applicable.
[[Page 2405]]
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents: 450.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.5-3 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,100 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $132,500.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: Section 307(b) of the Communications Act, as
amended, requires that the Commission effect a fair, efficient and
equitable distribution of radio stations throughout the United States.
In the context of competitive bidding application processing, Section
307(b) is relevant when a mutually exclusive AM application group
consists of applications to serve different communities, or when a non-
mutually exclusive AM application proposes a community of license
change. Such applications must submit supplemental information
addressing Section 307(b) criteria. The data submitted will be used to
determine the community having the greater need for an AM radio
service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-653 Filed 1-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-10-M
