Standard To Address Open Flame Ignition of Bedclothes; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 2514-2517 [05-415]
Download as PDF
2514
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
3. Place screens around both burners.
4. Open pilot ball valves one at a time and
ignite pilots with hand-held flame; adjust
flame size if necessary being very careful to
avoid a jet flame that could prematurely
ignite the test specimen (Beware: after a long
interval between tests the low pilot flow rate
will require a long time to displace air in the
line and achieve the steady-state flame size.)
5. Open both burner ball valves.
6. Start test exposure by simultaneously
turning on power to both timers (timers will
turn off burners at appropriate times).
7. Check/adjust propane flow rates (DO
THIS ESSENTIAL TASK IMMEDIATELY.
Experience shows the flow will not remain
the same from test-to-test in spite of fixed
valve positions so adjustment is essential.)
8. After burners are out:
a. Lift top burner and back assembly away
from specimen.
b. Turn off power to both timers.
c. Remove screens.
d. Turn off pilots at their ball valves.
Dated: December 22, 2004.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–416 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
List of Relevant Documents
1. Briefing memorandum from Margaret
Neily, Project Manager, Directorate for
Engineering Sciences, to the Commission,
‘‘Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Mattress
Flammability (Open Flame) and Options for
Addressing Bedclothes Involvement in
Mattress/Bedding Fires,’’ November 1, 2004.
2. Memorandum from Allyson Tenney, ES,
to Margaret Neily, Engineering Sciences,
‘‘Background and Technical Rationale for
Draft Proposed Standard for Open Flame
Mattress Flammability,’’ October 29, 2004.
3. Memorandum from Linda Smith and
David Miller, EPI, ‘‘Residential Fires
Involving Mattresses and Bedding,’’ October
2004.
4. Memorandum from Carolyn Meiers,
ESHF, to Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
‘‘Criteria for Judging Effectiveness of
Proposed Mattress Standard,’’ October 14,
2004.
5. Memorandum from Carolyn Meiers,
ESHF, to Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
‘‘Human Behavior in Fire,’’ October 7, 2004.
6. Memorandum from Treye Thomas and
Patricia Brundage, HS, ‘‘Qualitative
Assessment of Potential Risk from the Use of
Flame Retardant Chemicals in Mattresses,’’
October 25, 2004.
7. Memorandum from Robert Franklin, EC,
to Margaret L. Neily, ES, ‘‘Preliminary
Environmental Assessment of a Draft
Proposed Open-Flame Ignition Resistance
Standard for Mattresses,’’ October 21, 2004.
8. Memorandum from Soumaya Tohamy,
EC, to Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
‘‘Preliminary Regulatory Analysis of a Draft
Proposed Standard to Address Open Flame
Ignitions of Mattresses,’’ October 27, 2004.
9. Memorandum from Soumaya Tohamy,
EC, to Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
‘‘Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of a
Draft Proposed Standard to Address Open
Flame Ignitions of Mattresses,’’ October 27,
2004.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
10. Terrance R. Karels, EC, to Margaret L.
Neily, ES, ‘‘Updated Mattress Market
Information,’’ October 5, 2004.
11 Memorandum from Linda Smith EPI,
‘‘Involvement of Bedclothes in Residential
Mattress Fires,’’ May 2004.
12. Terrance R. Karels, EC, to Margaret L.
Neily, ES, ‘‘Bedding Market Information,’’
October 5, 2004.
13. Memorandum from Allyson Tenney,
ES, to Margaret Neily, Engineering Sciences,
‘‘Bedclothes Flammability,’’ October 29,
2004.
14. Memorandum from Martha A. Kosh,
OS, to ES, ‘‘Standard to Address Open Flame
Ignition of Mattresses/Bedding; ANPR,’’ List
of comments on CF 02–1, December 13, 2001.
15. Memorandum from Martha A. Kosh,
OS, to ES, ‘‘Standard to Address Open Flame
Ignition of Mattresses/Bedding; ANPR
(Revised),’’ List of comments on CF 02–1,
September 27, 2004.
16. National Research Council (2000).
Toxicological Risks of Selected FlameRetardant Chemicals (Washington, DC,
National Academy Press).
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1634
Standard To Address Open Flame
Ignition of Bedclothes; Advance Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Advance Notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission is
considering issuing a flammability
standard that would address open flame
ignition of bedclothes. (Commissioner
Thomas H. Moore issued a statement, a
copy of which is available from the
Commission’s Office of the Secretary or
from the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.cpsc.gov.) Elsewhere in
today’s Federal Register, the
Commission is proposing a flammability
standard that addresses open flame
ignition of mattresses/foundations.
Research indicates that in mattress fires
the mattress and bedclothes operate
together as a system. Thus, the
Commission believes that a
flammability standard for bedclothes in
addition to one for mattresses may be
appropriate. The Commission invites
comments concerning the risk of injury
identified in this notice, the regulatory
alternatives being considered, and other
possible alternatives. The Commission
also invites submission of any existing
standard or statement of intention to
modify or develop a voluntary standard
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
to address small open flame ignition of
bedclothes.
DATES: Comments and submissions
must be received by March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
mailed, preferably in five copies, to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207–0001, or
delivered to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland; telephone (301)
504–0800. Comments also may be filed
by telefacsimile to (301) 504–0127 or by
email to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. Comments
should be captioned ‘‘Bedclothes
ANPR.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Neily, Directorate for
Engineering Sciences, Consumer
Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207; telephone (301)
504–0508, extension 1293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
An existing flammability standard for
mattresses addresses ignition of
mattresses and mattress pads by
cigarettes. 16 CFR Part 1632. On October
11, 2001, the Commission published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(‘‘ANPR’’) addressing open flame
ignition of mattresses. 66 FR 51886.
That ANPR was the result of several
years of evaluation by Commission staff
and petitions on mattress flammability
submitted by Whitney Davis, Director of
the Children’s Coalition for Fire-safe
Mattresses. As explained in the ANPR,
the Sleep Products Safety Council
(‘‘SPSC’’), an affiliate of the
International Sleep Products
Association (‘‘ISPA’’), sponsored a
research program at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(‘‘NIST’’). The NIST research program
has provided a great deal of technical
information about mattress fires,
including the role of bedclothes in such
fires.
As noted in the mattress ANPR,
mattresses generally are not used alone,
but are covered by bedding or
bedclothes, whose presence
significantly affects the character of the
fire. In most incidents a small open
flame initially ignites the bedding, and
these materials serve as a larger ignition
source for the mattress. Because few
materials can resist such a large ignition
source, the typical approach of
preventing ignition of a mattress
through a product performance standard
may not be fully adequate for an open
flame mattress standard. Therefore, the
Commission has taken the approach in
E:\FR\FM\13JAP2.SGM
13JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
its proposed mattress standard of
limiting the fire intensity in order to
minimize the possibility of or delay
flashover for a period of time in
mattress/bedding fires. Flashover occurs
when a fire becomes so intense that all
exposed surfaces ignite nearly
simultaneously, and the fire quickly
spreads through the structure.
In response to the mattress ANPR, the
Commission received comments both in
favor of the Commission regulating
bedclothes and against such regulation.
Those opposed to regulating bedclothes
argued that bedclothes are an
uncontrolled variable and there is no
way to predict the type of bedclothes
that may become involved in a fire
incident. They also stated that there
would be no objective method to
determine if consumers were using
regulated bedclothes, there is little data
indicating that regulating some bedding
items would have an impact on the
hazard, and flammability performance
should not be based on what consumers
may (or may not) use as bedclothes.
Those in favor of regulating bedclothes
argued that bedclothes are a significant
ignition source for mattress fires and
significantly affect the burning
characteristics of the mattress and
foundation. They also asserted that
bedclothes can generate a fire large
enough to pose a hazard on their own,
and that improving the flammability of
certain bedclothes, such as filled items,
is economically feasible.
As discussed below, the Commission
believes that regulating bedclothes may
be appropriate. Bedclothes contribute
substantially to the complexity and
magnitude of the mattress fire hazard.
The NIST research has shown that, even
with mattresses that would meet the
Commission’s proposed open flame
mattress standard, certain bedclothes
have produced near flashover
conditions in laboratory tests.
B. The Products
The term ‘‘bedclothes’’ can include a
variety of products, such as sheets,
blankets, mattress pads, pillows,
comforters, and similar products that
are used as covering on a bed. Products
that contain fibrous or other materials
are called ‘‘filled’’ bedding. Because of
their greater mass or fuel load, filled
products are likely to contribute more
significantly to a mattress fire than
unfilled products, such as sheets and
blankets. California’s Bureau of Home
Furnishings and Thermal Insulation
(‘‘CBHF’’) has issued a draft Technical
Bulletin 604 that specifies an open
flame standard for filled bedding
products. The draft TB 604 does not
cover textiles, such as sheets,
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
pillowcases and blankets. CBHF only
regulates filled bedclothing.
At the present time, the Commission
is not limiting this rulemaking to any
particular bedclothes. The Commission
intends that during the course of
rulemaking it will evaluate continuing
research to determine which bedclothes
have the greatest impact on mattress
fires. The Commission requests
comments on particular bedclothes that
should be included in or excluded from
a proposed bedclothes standard.
At the request of CBHF, the American
Textiles Manufacturers Institute
(‘‘ATMI’’) conducted a survey in 2003 of
its members about the U.S. market for
filled bedding products. The 12 firms
surveyed reportedly account for 80% of
the U.S. market for these products.
Although these firms are located in the
U.S., many of their products are
manufactured outside the U.S.
According to U.S. Department of
Commerce 2002 import statistics,
perhaps 90% of all quilts and
comforters, and perhaps 20% of all bed
pillows are imported. According to the
ATMI survey, the most common fill
material for bedclothes is polyester (not
flame-resistant). Some of the improved
fill materials being developed for
mattresses could also be used for
bedclothes. Use of barrier fabrics or
flame resistant outer fabrics are other
approaches that could be used to
improve fire performance of bedclothes.
A trade publication, ‘‘Home Textiles
Today,’’ reported in its 2003 annual
business issue that the top five firms
marketing comforters and bedspreads
sold about $1.1 billion in the U.S. in
2002, essentially unchanged from 2001.
The top five makers of down comforters
reported sales of about $303 million in
2002.
Mattress pads are constructed of the
same types of foam used in mattresses
and filled bedding products. They can
also contribute significantly to mattress/
bedding fires. Foam mattress pads may
be made with a flat surface, an ‘‘egg
crate’’ design, or with ‘‘memory foam’’
that contours to the body. Egg crate pads
retail for $10 to $50 each. Industry
sources estimate that perhaps 4 to 5
million egg crate pads are sold annually.
Memory pads, which retail for $100 or
more, sell about 3 million units
annually.
C. Risk of Injury
The most recent national fire loss
estimates indicated that mattresses and
bedding were the first items to ignite in
19,400 residential fires attended by the
fire service annually during 1995–1999
(based on data from the U.S. Fire
Administration’s National Fire Incident
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2515
Reporting System data and the National
Fire Protection Association’s annual
survey). These fires resulted in 440
deaths, 2,230 injuries and $273.9
million in property loss each year. Open
flame ignition sources accounted for 35
percent of these fires and smoking
material sources accounted for 30
percent of the fires. The remaining fires
included a variety of ignition sources
including heat sources too close to the
bed. Based on these data alone, it is very
difficult to determine whether the first
item ignited was a mattress or an item
of bedclothes.
The primary source for information
on the involvement of various
bedclothes items in mattress fires is
CPSC’s in-depth investigations. Staff
analyzed 241 investigated fire incidents
that occurred between January 2000 and
June 2003. These investigations were
based on a variety of initial sources,
NEISS hospital emergency room reports,
newspaper clippings, and fire
department reports.
Unless someone witnessed the fire
ignition, it was often difficult to
determine whether the mattress or a
bedclothes item, such as a pillow or
blanket, ignited first. When the initial
ignition was not observed and reported,
staff determined what ignited first based
on the reported scenario. For example,
if a lamp fell on a blanket on the top
surface of the bed, the incident was
classified as igniting the blanket first.
Based on this evaluation, it was
determined that a non-electric
bedclothes item ignited first in 190 of
235 fires (81 percent). However, in 75
percent of those bedclothes’ ignitions it
was not possible to determine the type
of bedclothes involved. Among
incidents for which a specific item was
reported, sheets, blankets, and
comforters/quilts were the items cited
most frequently. Ignition sources
included cigarette lighters (primarily
children playing), candles, smoking
materials, and other nearby heat
sources. Although the investigations
could not provide information on which
types of bedclothes were more likely to
ignite, they did show that most
bedclothes items that were present did
ignite at some point during the fire.
D. Statutory Provisions
Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics
Act (‘‘FFA’’) authorizes the Commission
to initiate proceedings for a
flammability standard when it finds that
such a standard is ‘‘needed to protect
the public against unreasonable risk of
the occurrence of fire leading to death
or personal injury, or significant
property damage.’’ 15 U.S.C. 1193(a).
That section also sets forth the process
E:\FR\FM\13JAP2.SGM
13JAP2
2516
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
by which the Commission can issue a
flammability standard. The Commission
first must issue an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (‘‘ANPR’’) which:
(1) Identifies the fabric or product and
the nature of the risk associated with the
fabric or product; (2) summarizes the
regulatory alternatives under
consideration; (3) provides information
about existing relevant standards and
reasons why the Commission does not
preliminarily believe that these
standards are adequate; (4) invites
interested persons to submit comments
concerning the identified risk of injury,
regulatory alternatives being considered,
and other possible alternatives; (5)
invites submission of an existing
standard or portion of a standard as a
proposed regulation; and (6) invites
submission of a statement of intention
to modify or develop a voluntary
standard to address the risk of injury. 15
U.S.C. 1193(g).
If, after reviewing comments and
submissions responding to the ANPR,
the Commission determines to continue
the rulemaking proceeding, it will issue
a notice of proposed rulemaking. This
notice must contain the text of the
proposed rule along with alternatives
the Commission has considered and a
preliminary regulatory analysis. 15
U.S.C. 1193(i). Before issuing a final
rule, the Commission must prepare a
final regulatory analysis, and it must
make certain findings concerning any
relevant voluntary standard, the
relationship of costs and benefits of the
rule, and the burden imposed by the
regulation. Id. 1193(j). The Commission
also must provide an opportunity for
interested persons to make an oral
presentation before the Commission
issues a final rule. Id. 1193(d).
E. Existing Open Flame Standards
Currently, there are no mandatory
flammability requirements for
residential bedclothes in the United
States. A few voluntary standards apply
to bedding items. ASTM D4151–92
(2001) measures ease of ignition and
surface flame spread of blankets.
Underwriters Laboratories (‘‘UL’’) has a
standard for electric blankets. A
European standard, ISO 12952—
Textiles—Burning behaviour of bedding
items, Parts 1–4, specifies a general test
method for assessing the ignitability of
bedding items. The test method calls for
observation of progressive smoldering
and/or flaming when a bedding
specimen is exposed to a small propane
burner. The test relates only to
ignitability of the bedding material
under the specific conditions of the test.
None of these tests appears adequate to
measure or address the specific hazard
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
posed by a bedclothes item or its
contribution to a residential mattress/
bedding fire.
F. California’s Rulemaking
In 2001, the California legislature
passed Assembly Bill 603 (‘‘AB 603’’),
which mandated that CBHF issue
regulations by January 2004 that would
require that mattresses and box springs
meet a test for open-flame resistance.
AB 603 also stated: ‘‘If the bureau
[CBHF] concludes that other bedding
contributes to mattress fires, the
regulations shall require the other
bedding to be flame retardant under the
resistance to open-flame test.’’ Based on
their own research and that conducted
by NIST, CBHF determined that
regulation of filled bedding products—
such as comforters, pillows, and
mattress pads—is necessary. CBHF has
been working with a multi-disciplinary
task force to develop a proposed
standard for these bedding items. CBHF
prepared a draft standard (TB 604) that
was discussed in the Task Force in
2003. However, it was withdrawn
because of technical problems with the
test method. CBHF issued a new draft of
the TB 604 standard on October 1, 2004,
and scheduled a Task Force meeting for
November 18, 2004, to discuss it. CBHF
has stated that it expects to open formal
rulemaking at the end of the year and
hold hearings on the proposal in
January or February 2005.
G. Technical Research on Bedclothes
As discussed in the mattress ANPR,
several research projects have examined
open-flame ignited mattress and
bedding fires. Some of this research
provides a better understanding of the
contribution of bedclothes to these fires.
The Sleep Product Safety Council
(‘‘SPSC’’) sponsored several phases of
research at NIST. One of the focuses
during Phase 1 was to evaluate the fire
behavior of various combinations of
bedclothes. Twelve different
combinations of bedclothes sets ranging
from very light (two sheets and a pillow)
to heavy (two sheets, a pillow, a
mattress pad, one blanket, and one
heavy weight filled comforter) were
burned on an inert, twin-size mattress
made of fiberglass. The peak heat
release rates varied from 50kW to
200kW. Combinations without a
comforter were typically under 100kW.
Peak heat release rate is basically a
measure of the intensity of the fire
produced by these items. Further tests
were conducted on a range of
combinations of bedclothes.
Part of Phase 2 of the NIST work
included a limited assessment of
bedclothes and their contribution to
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
mattress fire hazards. The same set of
bedclothes was used on mattresses of
varying heat release rate performance.
The bedclothes were tested with a king
sized mattress that had contributed very
little heat release rate in prior testing
without bedclothes. The result was a
peak heat release rate of 400kW,
primarily from the bedclothes. While
this scenario would not readily cause
flashover, it is important to note that
this result assumes little involvement
from the mattress.
SPSC expanded its research at NIST
to examine filled bedclothes (such as
comforters, pillows, and mattress pads).
This research tested bedclothes
constructed of a variety of filling and
cover materials to assess the effect of
material changes on the flammability
behavior. The study evaluated two
design changes: One involved replacing
polyester fiberfill with a modified,
lower heat release fiber of a comparable
loft; the other involved using a barriertype cover to protect the polyester
fiberfill. These design changes were
examined using three different mattress
and foundation designs: One
representing current mattress/
foundation construction and the other
two using experimental, improved
designs.
The report on this bedclothes study
was published in February 2003, NIST
Technical Note 1449. According to the
NIST report, for a mattress standard to
be most effective, the performance of the
entire bedding system (that is, the
mattress/foundation and the bedclothes)
must be taken into consideration. The
study showed that the bedclothes and
the mattress/foundation function as a
system and that the improved mattress
pads, pillows and comforters resulted in
major improvements in the performance
of the system. This was indicated by a
lower peak heat release rate or a longer
time to peak.
A related research project conducted
for CPSC by NIST reinforced one of the
conclusions of the bedclothes study
discussed above. A portion of the tests
using conventional bedclothes showed
that, as mattress designs improve, two
separate peak heat release rates occur.
The first observed peak appears to be
dominated by the bedclothes, while the
second is dominated by the mattress/
foundation. Good mattress designs
tended to have a peak heat release rate
appreciably later in the test and
comparable to or less than the peak
dominated by the bedclothes.
A more recent study conducted for
CPSC by NIST included a series of tests
using the same bedclothes combination
on twin, queen, and king size
mattresses. The tests were conducted in
E:\FR\FM\13JAP2.SGM
13JAP2
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
a room environment to evaluate any
resulting room effects, which generally
begin to occur at heat release rates of
about 300 to 400kW. The early heat
release rate peaks, driven primarily by
burning bedclothes, tripled from twin
size to king size. Larger size bedclothes
combinations on good performing
mattress designs (those with peak heat
release rates less than 50kW when
tested with burners and no bedclothes)
showed heat release rate peaks up to
800 kW, occurring 7 to 8 minutes after
ignition. This is much higher than rates
allowed for mattresses/foundations
under CPSC’s proposed mattress
standard. On mattress designs that
yielded a moderate heat release rate
peak with burners, the bedclothes
resulted in more serious fires. This
study shows that a combination of some
bedclothes with even a well performing
mattress/foundation (that would meet
CPSC’s proposed mattress standard)
could still cause flashover in a room.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:56 Jan 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
H. Invitation To Comment
In accordance with section 4(g) of the
FFA, the Commission invites comments
on this notice. Specifically, the
Commission invites the following types
of comments.
1. Comments concerning the risk of
injury identified in this notice, the
regulatory alternatives discussed above,
and other alternatives to address the risk
of injury;
2. The submission of an existing
standard or portion of a standard as a
proposed rule;
3. The submission of a statement of
intention to modify or develop a
voluntary standard to address the risk of
injury identified in the notice along
with a description of a plan to modify
or develop the standard.
In addition, the Commission is
interested in obtaining further
information about the following issues
that may influence the flammability of
bedclothes.
1. Cleaning and laundering methods
of bedclothes;
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2517
2. Frequency of cleaning or
laundering of various bedclothes items
over their useful lives.
Dated: December 22, 2004.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
List of Relevant Documents
1. Briefing memorandum from Margaret
Neily, Project Manager, Directorate for
Engineering Sciences, to the Commission,
‘‘Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Mattress
Flammability (Open Flame) and Options for
Addressing Bedclothes Involvement in
Mattress/Bedding Fires,’’ November 1, 2004.
2. Memorandum from Linda Smith, EPHA,
to Margaret Neily, Engineering Sciences,
‘‘Involvement of Bedclothes in Residential
Fires Mattress Fires,’’ May 2004.
3. Memorandum from Terrance R. Karels,
EC, to Margaret L. Neily, ES, ‘‘Bedding
Market Information,’’ October 5, 2004.
4. Memorandum from Allyson Tenney, ES,
to Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
‘‘Bedclothes Flammability,’’ October 29,
2004.
[FR Doc. 05–415 Filed 1–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13JAP2.SGM
13JAP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2514-2517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-415]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1634
Standard To Address Open Flame Ignition of Bedclothes; Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Advance Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is considering issuing a flammability standard
that would address open flame ignition of bedclothes. (Commissioner
Thomas H. Moore issued a statement, a copy of which is available from
the Commission's Office of the Secretary or from the Commission's Web
site, https://www.cpsc.gov.) Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, the
Commission is proposing a flammability standard that addresses open
flame ignition of mattresses/foundations. Research indicates that in
mattress fires the mattress and bedclothes operate together as a
system. Thus, the Commission believes that a flammability standard for
bedclothes in addition to one for mattresses may be appropriate. The
Commission invites comments concerning the risk of injury identified in
this notice, the regulatory alternatives being considered, and other
possible alternatives. The Commission also invites submission of any
existing standard or statement of intention to modify or develop a
voluntary standard to address small open flame ignition of bedclothes.
DATES: Comments and submissions must be received by March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed, preferably in five copies, to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207-0001, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland; telephone (301) 504-0800. Comments also may be
filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127 or by email to cpsc-
os@cpsc.gov. Comments should be captioned ``Bedclothes ANPR.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Neily, Directorate for
Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington,
DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-0508, extension 1293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
An existing flammability standard for mattresses addresses ignition
of mattresses and mattress pads by cigarettes. 16 CFR Part 1632. On
October 11, 2001, the Commission published an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (``ANPR'') addressing open flame ignition of
mattresses. 66 FR 51886. That ANPR was the result of several years of
evaluation by Commission staff and petitions on mattress flammability
submitted by Whitney Davis, Director of the Children's Coalition for
Fire-safe Mattresses. As explained in the ANPR, the Sleep Products
Safety Council (``SPSC''), an affiliate of the International Sleep
Products Association (``ISPA''), sponsored a research program at the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (``NIST''). The NIST
research program has provided a great deal of technical information
about mattress fires, including the role of bedclothes in such fires.
As noted in the mattress ANPR, mattresses generally are not used
alone, but are covered by bedding or bedclothes, whose presence
significantly affects the character of the fire. In most incidents a
small open flame initially ignites the bedding, and these materials
serve as a larger ignition source for the mattress. Because few
materials can resist such a large ignition source, the typical approach
of preventing ignition of a mattress through a product performance
standard may not be fully adequate for an open flame mattress standard.
Therefore, the Commission has taken the approach in
[[Page 2515]]
its proposed mattress standard of limiting the fire intensity in order
to minimize the possibility of or delay flashover for a period of time
in mattress/bedding fires. Flashover occurs when a fire becomes so
intense that all exposed surfaces ignite nearly simultaneously, and the
fire quickly spreads through the structure.
In response to the mattress ANPR, the Commission received comments
both in favor of the Commission regulating bedclothes and against such
regulation. Those opposed to regulating bedclothes argued that
bedclothes are an uncontrolled variable and there is no way to predict
the type of bedclothes that may become involved in a fire incident.
They also stated that there would be no objective method to determine
if consumers were using regulated bedclothes, there is little data
indicating that regulating some bedding items would have an impact on
the hazard, and flammability performance should not be based on what
consumers may (or may not) use as bedclothes. Those in favor of
regulating bedclothes argued that bedclothes are a significant ignition
source for mattress fires and significantly affect the burning
characteristics of the mattress and foundation. They also asserted that
bedclothes can generate a fire large enough to pose a hazard on their
own, and that improving the flammability of certain bedclothes, such as
filled items, is economically feasible.
As discussed below, the Commission believes that regulating
bedclothes may be appropriate. Bedclothes contribute substantially to
the complexity and magnitude of the mattress fire hazard. The NIST
research has shown that, even with mattresses that would meet the
Commission's proposed open flame mattress standard, certain bedclothes
have produced near flashover conditions in laboratory tests.
B. The Products
The term ``bedclothes'' can include a variety of products, such as
sheets, blankets, mattress pads, pillows, comforters, and similar
products that are used as covering on a bed. Products that contain
fibrous or other materials are called ``filled'' bedding. Because of
their greater mass or fuel load, filled products are likely to
contribute more significantly to a mattress fire than unfilled
products, such as sheets and blankets. California's Bureau of Home
Furnishings and Thermal Insulation (``CBHF'') has issued a draft
Technical Bulletin 604 that specifies an open flame standard for filled
bedding products. The draft TB 604 does not cover textiles, such as
sheets, pillowcases and blankets. CBHF only regulates filled
bedclothing.
At the present time, the Commission is not limiting this rulemaking
to any particular bedclothes. The Commission intends that during the
course of rulemaking it will evaluate continuing research to determine
which bedclothes have the greatest impact on mattress fires. The
Commission requests comments on particular bedclothes that should be
included in or excluded from a proposed bedclothes standard.
At the request of CBHF, the American Textiles Manufacturers
Institute (``ATMI'') conducted a survey in 2003 of its members about
the U.S. market for filled bedding products. The 12 firms surveyed
reportedly account for 80% of the U.S. market for these products.
Although these firms are located in the U.S., many of their products
are manufactured outside the U.S. According to U.S. Department of
Commerce 2002 import statistics, perhaps 90% of all quilts and
comforters, and perhaps 20% of all bed pillows are imported. According
to the ATMI survey, the most common fill material for bedclothes is
polyester (not flame-resistant). Some of the improved fill materials
being developed for mattresses could also be used for bedclothes. Use
of barrier fabrics or flame resistant outer fabrics are other
approaches that could be used to improve fire performance of
bedclothes.
A trade publication, ``Home Textiles Today,'' reported in its 2003
annual business issue that the top five firms marketing comforters and
bedspreads sold about $1.1 billion in the U.S. in 2002, essentially
unchanged from 2001. The top five makers of down comforters reported
sales of about $303 million in 2002.
Mattress pads are constructed of the same types of foam used in
mattresses and filled bedding products. They can also contribute
significantly to mattress/bedding fires. Foam mattress pads may be made
with a flat surface, an ``egg crate'' design, or with ``memory foam''
that contours to the body. Egg crate pads retail for $10 to $50 each.
Industry sources estimate that perhaps 4 to 5 million egg crate pads
are sold annually. Memory pads, which retail for $100 or more, sell
about 3 million units annually.
C. Risk of Injury
The most recent national fire loss estimates indicated that
mattresses and bedding were the first items to ignite in 19,400
residential fires attended by the fire service annually during 1995-
1999 (based on data from the U.S. Fire Administration's National Fire
Incident Reporting System data and the National Fire Protection
Association's annual survey). These fires resulted in 440 deaths, 2,230
injuries and $273.9 million in property loss each year. Open flame
ignition sources accounted for 35 percent of these fires and smoking
material sources accounted for 30 percent of the fires. The remaining
fires included a variety of ignition sources including heat sources too
close to the bed. Based on these data alone, it is very difficult to
determine whether the first item ignited was a mattress or an item of
bedclothes.
The primary source for information on the involvement of various
bedclothes items in mattress fires is CPSC's in-depth investigations.
Staff analyzed 241 investigated fire incidents that occurred between
January 2000 and June 2003. These investigations were based on a
variety of initial sources, NEISS hospital emergency room reports,
newspaper clippings, and fire department reports.
Unless someone witnessed the fire ignition, it was often difficult
to determine whether the mattress or a bedclothes item, such as a
pillow or blanket, ignited first. When the initial ignition was not
observed and reported, staff determined what ignited first based on the
reported scenario. For example, if a lamp fell on a blanket on the top
surface of the bed, the incident was classified as igniting the blanket
first. Based on this evaluation, it was determined that a non-electric
bedclothes item ignited first in 190 of 235 fires (81 percent).
However, in 75 percent of those bedclothes' ignitions it was not
possible to determine the type of bedclothes involved. Among incidents
for which a specific item was reported, sheets, blankets, and
comforters/quilts were the items cited most frequently. Ignition
sources included cigarette lighters (primarily children playing),
candles, smoking materials, and other nearby heat sources. Although the
investigations could not provide information on which types of
bedclothes were more likely to ignite, they did show that most
bedclothes items that were present did ignite at some point during the
fire.
D. Statutory Provisions
Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act (``FFA'') authorizes the
Commission to initiate proceedings for a flammability standard when it
finds that such a standard is ``needed to protect the public against
unreasonable risk of the occurrence of fire leading to death or
personal injury, or significant property damage.'' 15 U.S.C. 1193(a).
That section also sets forth the process
[[Page 2516]]
by which the Commission can issue a flammability standard. The
Commission first must issue an advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(``ANPR'') which: (1) Identifies the fabric or product and the nature
of the risk associated with the fabric or product; (2) summarizes the
regulatory alternatives under consideration; (3) provides information
about existing relevant standards and reasons why the Commission does
not preliminarily believe that these standards are adequate; (4)
invites interested persons to submit comments concerning the identified
risk of injury, regulatory alternatives being considered, and other
possible alternatives; (5) invites submission of an existing standard
or portion of a standard as a proposed regulation; and (6) invites
submission of a statement of intention to modify or develop a voluntary
standard to address the risk of injury. 15 U.S.C. 1193(g).
If, after reviewing comments and submissions responding to the
ANPR, the Commission determines to continue the rulemaking proceeding,
it will issue a notice of proposed rulemaking. This notice must contain
the text of the proposed rule along with alternatives the Commission
has considered and a preliminary regulatory analysis. 15 U.S.C.
1193(i). Before issuing a final rule, the Commission must prepare a
final regulatory analysis, and it must make certain findings concerning
any relevant voluntary standard, the relationship of costs and benefits
of the rule, and the burden imposed by the regulation. Id. 1193(j). The
Commission also must provide an opportunity for interested persons to
make an oral presentation before the Commission issues a final rule.
Id. 1193(d).
E. Existing Open Flame Standards
Currently, there are no mandatory flammability requirements for
residential bedclothes in the United States. A few voluntary standards
apply to bedding items. ASTM D4151-92 (2001) measures ease of ignition
and surface flame spread of blankets. Underwriters Laboratories
(``UL'') has a standard for electric blankets. A European standard, ISO
12952--Textiles--Burning behaviour of bedding items, Parts 1-4,
specifies a general test method for assessing the ignitability of
bedding items. The test method calls for observation of progressive
smoldering and/or flaming when a bedding specimen is exposed to a small
propane burner. The test relates only to ignitability of the bedding
material under the specific conditions of the test. None of these tests
appears adequate to measure or address the specific hazard posed by a
bedclothes item or its contribution to a residential mattress/bedding
fire.
F. California's Rulemaking
In 2001, the California legislature passed Assembly Bill 603 (``AB
603''), which mandated that CBHF issue regulations by January 2004 that
would require that mattresses and box springs meet a test for open-
flame resistance. AB 603 also stated: ``If the bureau [CBHF] concludes
that other bedding contributes to mattress fires, the regulations shall
require the other bedding to be flame retardant under the resistance to
open-flame test.'' Based on their own research and that conducted by
NIST, CBHF determined that regulation of filled bedding products--such
as comforters, pillows, and mattress pads--is necessary. CBHF has been
working with a multi-disciplinary task force to develop a proposed
standard for these bedding items. CBHF prepared a draft standard (TB
604) that was discussed in the Task Force in 2003. However, it was
withdrawn because of technical problems with the test method. CBHF
issued a new draft of the TB 604 standard on October 1, 2004, and
scheduled a Task Force meeting for November 18, 2004, to discuss it.
CBHF has stated that it expects to open formal rulemaking at the end of
the year and hold hearings on the proposal in January or February 2005.
G. Technical Research on Bedclothes
As discussed in the mattress ANPR, several research projects have
examined open-flame ignited mattress and bedding fires. Some of this
research provides a better understanding of the contribution of
bedclothes to these fires.
The Sleep Product Safety Council (``SPSC'') sponsored several
phases of research at NIST. One of the focuses during Phase 1 was to
evaluate the fire behavior of various combinations of bedclothes.
Twelve different combinations of bedclothes sets ranging from very
light (two sheets and a pillow) to heavy (two sheets, a pillow, a
mattress pad, one blanket, and one heavy weight filled comforter) were
burned on an inert, twin-size mattress made of fiberglass. The peak
heat release rates varied from 50kW to 200kW. Combinations without a
comforter were typically under 100kW. Peak heat release rate is
basically a measure of the intensity of the fire produced by these
items. Further tests were conducted on a range of combinations of
bedclothes.
Part of Phase 2 of the NIST work included a limited assessment of
bedclothes and their contribution to mattress fire hazards. The same
set of bedclothes was used on mattresses of varying heat release rate
performance. The bedclothes were tested with a king sized mattress that
had contributed very little heat release rate in prior testing without
bedclothes. The result was a peak heat release rate of 400kW, primarily
from the bedclothes. While this scenario would not readily cause
flashover, it is important to note that this result assumes little
involvement from the mattress.
SPSC expanded its research at NIST to examine filled bedclothes
(such as comforters, pillows, and mattress pads). This research tested
bedclothes constructed of a variety of filling and cover materials to
assess the effect of material changes on the flammability behavior. The
study evaluated two design changes: One involved replacing polyester
fiberfill with a modified, lower heat release fiber of a comparable
loft; the other involved using a barrier-type cover to protect the
polyester fiberfill. These design changes were examined using three
different mattress and foundation designs: One representing current
mattress/foundation construction and the other two using experimental,
improved designs.
The report on this bedclothes study was published in February 2003,
NIST Technical Note 1449. According to the NIST report, for a mattress
standard to be most effective, the performance of the entire bedding
system (that is, the mattress/foundation and the bedclothes) must be
taken into consideration. The study showed that the bedclothes and the
mattress/foundation function as a system and that the improved mattress
pads, pillows and comforters resulted in major improvements in the
performance of the system. This was indicated by a lower peak heat
release rate or a longer time to peak.
A related research project conducted for CPSC by NIST reinforced
one of the conclusions of the bedclothes study discussed above. A
portion of the tests using conventional bedclothes showed that, as
mattress designs improve, two separate peak heat release rates occur.
The first observed peak appears to be dominated by the bedclothes,
while the second is dominated by the mattress/foundation. Good mattress
designs tended to have a peak heat release rate appreciably later in
the test and comparable to or less than the peak dominated by the
bedclothes.
A more recent study conducted for CPSC by NIST included a series of
tests using the same bedclothes combination on twin, queen, and king
size mattresses. The tests were conducted in
[[Page 2517]]
a room environment to evaluate any resulting room effects, which
generally begin to occur at heat release rates of about 300 to 400kW.
The early heat release rate peaks, driven primarily by burning
bedclothes, tripled from twin size to king size. Larger size bedclothes
combinations on good performing mattress designs (those with peak heat
release rates less than 50kW when tested with burners and no
bedclothes) showed heat release rate peaks up to 800 kW, occurring 7 to
8 minutes after ignition. This is much higher than rates allowed for
mattresses/foundations under CPSC's proposed mattress standard. On
mattress designs that yielded a moderate heat release rate peak with
burners, the bedclothes resulted in more serious fires. This study
shows that a combination of some bedclothes with even a well performing
mattress/foundation (that would meet CPSC's proposed mattress standard)
could still cause flashover in a room.
H. Invitation To Comment
In accordance with section 4(g) of the FFA, the Commission invites
comments on this notice. Specifically, the Commission invites the
following types of comments.
1. Comments concerning the risk of injury identified in this
notice, the regulatory alternatives discussed above, and other
alternatives to address the risk of injury;
2. The submission of an existing standard or portion of a standard
as a proposed rule;
3. The submission of a statement of intention to modify or develop
a voluntary standard to address the risk of injury identified in the
notice along with a description of a plan to modify or develop the
standard.
In addition, the Commission is interested in obtaining further
information about the following issues that may influence the
flammability of bedclothes.
1. Cleaning and laundering methods of bedclothes;
2. Frequency of cleaning or laundering of various bedclothes items
over their useful lives.
Dated: December 22, 2004.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
List of Relevant Documents
1. Briefing memorandum from Margaret Neily, Project Manager,
Directorate for Engineering Sciences, to the Commission, ``Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for Mattress Flammability (Open Flame) and
Options for Addressing Bedclothes Involvement in Mattress/Bedding
Fires,'' November 1, 2004.
2. Memorandum from Linda Smith, EPHA, to Margaret Neily,
Engineering Sciences, ``Involvement of Bedclothes in Residential
Fires Mattress Fires,'' May 2004.
3. Memorandum from Terrance R. Karels, EC, to Margaret L. Neily,
ES, ``Bedding Market Information,'' October 5, 2004.
4. Memorandum from Allyson Tenney, ES, to Margaret Neily,
Project Manager, ``Bedclothes Flammability,'' October 29, 2004.
[FR Doc. 05-415 Filed 1-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P