Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Performance Reporting System (PRS) for the Technology Opportunities Program (TOP), 2127-2128 [05-563]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Notices
westbound Skyway contract and 90
days after completion of the Suspension
Span foundations contract. This report
should detail the monitoring protocol,
summarize the data recorded during
monitoring, and estimate the number of
marine mammals that may have been
harassed due to pile driving. If
comments are received from the
Regional Administrator on the draft
final report, a final report must be
submitted to NMFS within 30 days
thereafter. If no comments are received
from NMFS, the draft final report will
be considered to be the final report.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
In November, 2003, NMFS prepared
an Environmental Assessment (EA) and,
on November 4, 2003 made a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI).
Therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement on this
action is not required. A copy of the EA
and FONSI are available upon request
(see ADDRESSES).
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On October 30, 2001, NMFS
completed consultation under section 7
of the ESA with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) on the
CALTRANS’ construction of a
replacement bridge for the East Span of
the SF-OBB in California. The finding
contained in the Biological Opinion was
that the CALTRANS action at the East
Span of the SF-OBB is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
listed anadromous salmonids, or result
in the destruction or adverse
modification of designated critical
habitat for these species. Listed marine
mammals are not expected to be in the
area of the action and thus would not be
affected. The issuance of this IHA to
CALTRANS constitutes an agency
action that authorizes an activity that
may affect ESA-listed species and,
therefore, is subject to section 7 of the
ESA. However, as the effects of the
underlying activities on listed
salmonids were analyzed during a
formal consultation between the FHWA
and NMFS, and as the underlying action
has not changed from that considered in
the consultation, the discussion of
effects that are contained in the
Biological Opinion issued to the FHWA
on October 30, 2001, pertains also to
this action. In conclusion, NMFS has
determined that issuance of an IHA for
this activity does not lead to any effects
to listed species apart from those that
were considered in the consultation on
FHWA’s action.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:37 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
2127
Determinations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
For the reasons discussed in this
document and in previously identified
supporting documents, NMFS has
determined that the impact of pile
driving and other activities associated
with construction of the East Span
Project should result, at worst, in the
Level B harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals
and potentially gray whales that inhabit
or visit SFB in general and the vicinity
of the SF-OBB in particular. While
behavioral modifications, including
temporarily vacating the area around the
construction site, may be made by these
species to avoid the resultant visual and
acoustic disturbance, the availability of
alternate areas within SFB and haul-out
sites (including pupping sites) and
feeding areas within the Bay has led
NMFS to preliminarily determine that
this action will have a negligible impact
on California sea lion, Pacific harbor
seal, and gray whale populations along
the California coast.
In addition, no take by Level A
harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes
should be at the lowest level practicable
due to incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this
document.
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
Authorization
For the reasons previously discussed,
NMFS has issued an IHA for a 1-year
period, for the potential incidental
harassment of small numbers of harbor
seals, California sea lions and California
gray whales incidental to construction
of a replacement bridge for the East
Span of the San Franciso-Oakland Bay
Bridge in California, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated. NMFS has determined
that the construction activity would
result in the harassment of only small
numbers of harbor seals, California sea
lions and possibly California gray
whales and will have no more than a
negligible impact on these marine
mammal stocks.
Dated: January 3, 2005.
Donna Wieting,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–624 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Performance
Reporting System (PRS) for the
Technology Opportunities Program
(TOP)
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.
L. 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Clifton Beck, NTIA, Room
H–4888, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet cbeck@ntia.doc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The purpose of the Technology
Opportunities Program (TOP), is to
promote the use of advanced
telecommunications and information
technologies in the non-profit and
public sectors. These projects encourage
the deployment of broadband
infrastructure, services, and
applications throughout the Nation.
TOP projects demonstrate how digital
networks support lifelong learning for
all Americans, help public safety
officials protect the public, assist in the
delivery of health care and public health
services, and foster communication,
resource-sharing, and economic
development.
Since 1994, the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA), in
administering TOP, has awarded 610
grants, in all 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands totaling $233.5 million
and leveraging $313.7 million in local
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
2128
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Notices
matching funds. TOP makes matching
grants to state, local and tribal
governments, non-profit health care
providers, schools, libraries, public
safety providers, and non-profit
community-based, faith-based
organizations, national organizations
and associations, museums, colleges,
universities, or other providers of social
services.
In order to ensure TOP’s ability to
assess the performance of its grants
program and to comply with the
Government Performance and Results
Act, NTIA will collect and analyze
quantitative and qualitative data relating
to start-up documentation, quarterly and
annual progress, and close-out
documentation on TOP-funded projects.
NTIA seeks a mechanism whereby it
can evaluate the impacts of its projects
on an ongoing basis, monitor grants
more efficiently and effectively, and
provide timely technical assistance to
grant recipients. To enable the Program
to monitor and to analyze the impacts
of the funded projects, TOP seeks to
incorporate standardized quantitative
and qualitative data elements into an
online structured reporting system. The
reporting system will include a set of
core data elements that apply to all
projects.
NTIA is interested in the effects that
the funded projects are having at the
local level and, over the long term, at
the national level. It is NTIA’s intention
to understand the nature and degree of
those effects on the organizations
implementing the projects, other
organizations that are involved with the
projects, the individuals who are served
by the projects, and the community as
a whole.
II. Method of Collection
Data will be collected through the use
of automated collection techniques. The
information collection instrument to be
used for this study will include a webbased structured reporting system for
both quantitative and qualitative project
information.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0660–0015.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State and local
government, and non-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.
Estimated Time Per Response: 20
hours for start-up documentation; 4
hours for progress reports; 30 minutes
for annual report; and 20 hours for final
closeout report.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 1,492.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:37 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Estimated Total Annual Cost to the
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request of OMB
approval of the information collection;
they also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–563 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Adjustment of Import Limits for Certain
Cotton, Wool and Man-Made Fiber
Textile Products Produced or
Manufactured in Cambodia
January 10, 2005.
Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA).
ACTION: Issuing a directive to the
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection retroactively
increasing 2004 limits by 4%.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
January 12, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naomi Freeman, International Trade
Specialist, Office of Textiles and
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
(202) 482–4212. For information on the
quota status of these limits, refer to the
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection website (https://
www.cbp.gov), or call (202) 344-2650.
For information on embargoes and quota
re-openings, refer to the Office of
Textiles and Apparel website at https://
otexa.ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural
Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854);
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as
amended.
In recognition of the continuing
efforts of Cambodia to improve working
conditions in the textile and apparel
sector, including internationally
recognized core labor standards,
through the application of Cambodian
labor law, and in response to the Second
Labor Consultation of 2004, the U.S.
Government is providing an increase of
4% of the base level quotas retroactively
to 2004 adjusted limits. Goods exported
on and after January 1, 2005 are not
subject to textile and apparel import
limits.
In the letter published below, the
Chairman of CITA directs the
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection to adjust the 2004
limits.
A description of the textile and
apparel categories in terms of HTS
numbers is available in the
CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel
Categories with the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (see
Federal Register notice 69 FR 4926,
published on February 2, 2004). Also
see 68 FR 68597, published on
December 9, 2003 and 69 FR 60617,
published on October 12, 2004.
Philip J. Martello,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
Committee for the Implementation of Textile
Agreements
January 10, 2005.
Commissioner,
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection,
Washington, DC 20229.
Dear Commissioner: You are directed,
effective on January 12, 2005, to increase the
restraint limits established in the directive
dated December 4, 2003 for textile products
in the following categories, produced or
manufactured in Cambodia and exported
during the twelve-month period which began
on January 1, 2004 and extended through
December 31, 2004, to reflect the continuing
efforts of the Royal Government of Cambodia
to improve working conditions in the textile
and apparel sector, and in response to the
Second Labor Consultation of 2004:
Category
331pt./631pt. 2 .........
334/634 ....................
335/635 ....................
338/339 ....................
340/640 ....................
345 ...........................
347/348/647/648 ......
352/652 ....................
435 ...........................
438 ...........................
445/446 ....................
638/639 ....................
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
adjusted twelve-month
limit 1
59,451 dozen pairs.
283,264 dozen.
108,217 dozen.
4,453,537 dozen.
1,318,876 dozen.
137,807 dozen.
4,767,375 dozen.
1,065,411 dozen.
26,594 dozen.
127,771 dozen.
156,164 dozen.
1,631,308 dozen.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2127-2128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Performance
Reporting System (PRS) for the Technology Opportunities Program (TOP)
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Clifton Beck, NTIA, Room H-4888, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via
the Internet cbeck@ntia.doc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The purpose of the Technology Opportunities Program (TOP), is to
promote the use of advanced telecommunications and information
technologies in the non-profit and public sectors. These projects
encourage the deployment of broadband infrastructure, services, and
applications throughout the Nation. TOP projects demonstrate how
digital networks support lifelong learning for all Americans, help
public safety officials protect the public, assist in the delivery of
health care and public health services, and foster communication,
resource-sharing, and economic development.
Since 1994, the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA), in administering TOP, has awarded 610 grants, in
all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands totaling $233.5 million and leveraging $313.7 million in
local
[[Page 2128]]
matching funds. TOP makes matching grants to state, local and tribal
governments, non-profit health care providers, schools, libraries,
public safety providers, and non-profit community-based, faith-based
organizations, national organizations and associations, museums,
colleges, universities, or other providers of social services.
In order to ensure TOP's ability to assess the performance of its
grants program and to comply with the Government Performance and
Results Act, NTIA will collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative
data relating to start-up documentation, quarterly and annual progress,
and close-out documentation on TOP-funded projects.
NTIA seeks a mechanism whereby it can evaluate the impacts of its
projects on an ongoing basis, monitor grants more efficiently and
effectively, and provide timely technical assistance to grant
recipients. To enable the Program to monitor and to analyze the impacts
of the funded projects, TOP seeks to incorporate standardized
quantitative and qualitative data elements into an online structured
reporting system. The reporting system will include a set of core data
elements that apply to all projects.
NTIA is interested in the effects that the funded projects are
having at the local level and, over the long term, at the national
level. It is NTIA's intention to understand the nature and degree of
those effects on the organizations implementing the projects, other
organizations that are involved with the projects, the individuals who
are served by the projects, and the community as a whole.
II. Method of Collection
Data will be collected through the use of automated collection
techniques. The information collection instrument to be used for this
study will include a web-based structured reporting system for both
quantitative and qualitative project information.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0660-0015.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State and local government, and non-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 50.
Estimated Time Per Response: 20 hours for start-up documentation; 4
hours for progress reports; 30 minutes for annual report; and 20 hours
for final closeout report.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 1,492.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request of OMB approval of the information
collection; they also become a matter of public record.
Dated: January 6, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-563 Filed 1-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-P