Cotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental Assessment on Imports (2004 Amendments), 2034-2053 [05-475]

Download as PDF 2034 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules its constituents equitably, both geographically and on a volume basis. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1160 Fluid milk, Milk, Promotion. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR part 1160 be amended as follows: Dated: January 5, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–580 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PART 1160—FLUID MILK PROMOTION PROGRAM Agricultural Marketing Service 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1160 continues to read as follows: 7 CFR Part 1205 Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6401–6417. [Doc. No. CN–04–001] 2. In § 1160.200, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows: Cotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental Assessment on Imports (2004 Amendments) § 1160.200 Establishment and membership. AGENCY: (a) There is hereby established a National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board of 20 members, 15 of whom shall represent geographic regions and five of whom shall be atlarge members of the Board. To the extent practicable, members representing geographic regions shall represent fluid milk processing operations of differing sizes. No fluid milk processor shall be represented on the Board by more than three members. The at-large members shall include at least three fluid milk processors and at least one member from the general public. Except for the non-processor member or members from the general public, nominees appointed to the Board must be active owners or employees of a fluid milk processor. The failure of such a member to own or work for such fluid milk processor shall disqualify that member for membership on the Board except that such member shall continue to serve on the Board for a period not to exceed 6 months following the disqualification or until appointment of a successor Board member to such position, whichever is sooner, provided that such person continues to meet the criteria for serving on the Board as a processor representative. Should a member representing the general public cease to be employed by the entity employing that member when appointed, gain employment with a new employer, or cease to own or operate the business which that member owned or operated at the date of appointment, such member shall be disqualified for membership on the Board, except that such member shall continue to serve on the Board for a period not to exceed 6 months, or until appointment of a successor Board member, whichever is sooner. * * * * * VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to amend the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations by adjusting the total rate of assessment per kilogram for imported cotton collected for use by the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of assessment would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale equivalent assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting the sum to account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in imported textile products. The proposed adjustment would reduce the assessable portion of the cotton content of imported textile products by the estimated average amount of U.S. cotton contained therein. Exemptions and refunds would continue to be provided for importers wishing to document the U.S. cotton content of specific goods. The proposed rule would continue to ensure that the total assessment collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of imported products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced cotton, and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not subject to more than one assessment. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 14, 2005. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule to Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy Administrator, Cotton Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 0224 Washington, DC 20250–0224. Comments should be submitted in triplicate. Comments may also be submitted electronically to: https:// www.cottoncomments@usda.gov or https://www.regulations.gov. All PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. All comments received will be made available for public inspection at Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, Room 2641–S, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250 during regular business hours. A copy of this notice may be found at: https:// www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/ rulemaking.htm. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy Administrator, Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Stop 0224, Washington, DC 20250– 0224, telephone (202) 720–2259, facsimile (202) 690–1718, or e-mail at whitney.rick@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866 The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process required by Executive Order 12866 for this action. Executive Order 12988 This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. This proposed rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. The Cotton Research and Promotion Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under Section 12 of the Act, any person subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provision of the plan, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such person is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the District Court of the United States in any district in which the person is an inhabitant, or has his principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary’s ruling, provided a complaint is filed within 20 days from the date of the entry of ruling. Regulatory Flexibility Act Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) AMS has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities and has determined that its implementation will not have a E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses. There are an estimated 10,000 importers who are presently subject to rules and regulations issued pursuant to the Cotton Research and Promotion Order. The majority of these importers are small businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business Administration. The proposed rule would reduce the total rate of assessment per kilogram for imported cotton products collected for use by the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of assessment would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale equivalent assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting the sum to account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in imported textile products. The proposed adjustment to the sum would reduce the assessable portion of the cotton content of imported products by 22.2 percent, the current average estimated by AMS of U.S. cotton contained therein. The proposed total rate of assessment per kilogram for imported raw cotton and cotton textile products would be calculated using the following formula: increase the assessment on raw cotton to $0.010472, an increase of $0.002205. Even though the assessment would be raised for imported raw cotton, the increase is small and will not significantly affect small businesses. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate of assessment for imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year. The proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of importers of cotton and cotton-containing products because importers would be paying a small increase on imported raw cotton and a reduced rate of total assessment on imported cotton products. 1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 × .453597). $1 per bale assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or $0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8). Background The Cotton Research and Promotion Act (Act), as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2101 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1966. Congress intended the Act to: 2. Supplemental Assessment of ⁄ of One Percent of the Value of the Cotton Converted to Kilograms The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 × 2.2046). Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals $0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 × .005). 5 10 3. Adjustment for U.S. Cotton Content of Imported Products The adjustment for the U.S. cotton content of assessed imports is obtained by multiplying the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above by the U.S. cotton share of total net cotton textile imports (0.222) which equals $0.002325 per kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. × 0.222). Subtracting this amount from the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above would equal the proposed total rate of assessment for imported products of $0.008147 per kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. ¥ $0.002325 per kg. = $0.008147). The current total rate of assessment on imported raw cotton and imported cotton products is $0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule would VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 Paperwork Reduction In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the information collection requirements contained in the regulation to be amended have been previously approved by OMB and were assigned control number 0581–0093. [E]nable the establishment of an orderly procedure for the development, financing through adequate assessments on all cotton marketed in the United States and on imports of cotton, and carrying out an effective and continuous coordinated program of research and promotion designed to strengthen cotton’s competitive position and to maintain and expand domestic and foreign markets and uses for United States cotton. 7 U.S.C. 2101. The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture to issue a Cotton Research and Promotion Order. An amended Order was approved by producers and importers voting in a referendum held July 17–26, 1991. The amended Order was published in the Federal Register on December 10, 1991 (56 FR 64470). A proposed rule implementing the amended Order was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 1991 (56 FR 65450). Implementing rules were published on July 1 and 2, 1992, (57 FR 29181) and (57 FR 29431), respectively. The Order imposes an assessment on the production and importation of cotton in order to pay for the generic research and promotion projects authorized by the Act. The assessment consists of two parts, an assessment of $1 per bale of PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 2035 cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton containing products, and a supplemental assessment tied to the value of cotton. The Act requires the Secretary to establish procedures to ensure that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not subject to more than one assessment. Under the current procedures established in the regulations, an importer may receive an exemption from paying the assessment or a reimbursement of the assessment paid by submitting sufficient documentation to the Board to verify the U.S. cotton content of the products to be imported or already imported. Because foreign mills frequently mix U.S. cotton with other cottons when formulating cotton yarns and fabrics, the ability of importers, except those purchasing products from mills that use only U.S. cotton, to verify through documentation the U.S. cotton content of the products they are importing may be limited. AMS believes that changes in the composition of U.S. cotton use and the upcoming completion of the removal of all U.S. import quotas on textile manufactures as outlined in the Agreement on Textile and Clothing necessitates a change to its current regulatory procedures for ensuring that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not subject to more than one assessment. Prior to the 2001/ 2002 crop year, the majority of U.S. (upland) cotton (58 percent in the 2000/ 2001 crop year) was consumed domestically by U.S. mills. Starting with the 2001/2002 crop year, a majority of U.S. cotton was exported (67 percent in 2003/2004). AMS expects this shift in the composition of U.S. cotton use to continue into the foreseeable future and that the ending of U.S. textile quotas will lead to an increase in the amount of U.S. cotton returning to the United States in cotton product imports. AMS, therefore, believes that it is appropriate at this time to make an adjustment to the total rate of assessment to account for the amount of U.S. cotton content of imported textile products. The estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable cotton imports would be calculated by multiplying the U.S. cotton export share of foreign mill use adjusted for location by assessable imports. Adjusting the average amount of U.S. cotton contained in total cotton imports for location would ensure that the U.S. cotton content of total cotton imports would properly account for differences among supplying countries with respect to U.S. cotton’s share of their cotton mill use and in their share of U.S. cotton product imports. E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2036 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules AMS will use regularly published statistics on U.S. exports by destination (Weekly Export Sales Report), the world’s textile usage of cotton by country (Foreign Agricultural Service Cotton Circular) and the raw cotton equivalent contained in imports and exports of textile manufactures by country (Cotton & Wool Outlook) in the calculations of the U.S. content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products. AMS would determine the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable cotton imports as follows: Step 1. Define six non-U.S. cotton product supply regions: (i) North America: Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, (ii) South America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, (iii) Asia: China, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, (iv) Europe: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Turkey, (v) Oceania: Australia, and (vi) Africa: Ivory Coast, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa. These six regions coincide with the six regions used by the USDA’s Economic Research Service in its reporting of U.S. cotton textile imports. Step 2. Calculate the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for each region by dividing total U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region by total mill consumption of raw cotton in that region. This would represent an approximation of the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in all cotton products imported into the United States from that region. For the purpose of this calculation, U.S. cotton content contained in a region’s cotton products is uniformly distributed across each product manufactured in that region. Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data available and determined that U.S. cotton’s share of non-U.S. mill use for each region was as follows: North America, 100.0 percent; South America, 16.0 percent; Asia, 9.9 percent; Europe, 11.6 percent; Oceana, 0.0 percent; and Africa, 0.2 percent. These shares were obtained by dividing U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region by total cotton mill use in each region. The specific calculations are shown in Table 1. TABLE 1.—TABULATION OF U.S. COTTON EXPORT SHARE OF FOREIGN MILL USE U.S. exports of raw cotton Region Raw cotton mill use—million 480 lb. Bales— 2.842 0.833 6.481 1.757 0.000 0.006 2.767 5.207 65.254 15.103 0.125 2.876 North America .............................................................................................................................. South America ............................................................................................................................. Asia .............................................................................................................................................. Europe ......................................................................................................................................... Oceana ........................................................................................................................................ Africa ............................................................................................................................................ a North U.S. cotton share of raw cotton mill use a 1.000 0.160 0.099 0.116 0.000 0.002 America share capped at 1.000. Step 3. Determine total imports of assessable cotton for each region by subtracting the total cotton content of U.S. exports of processed cotton products in raw cotton equivalents to each region from the total cotton content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products from that region in raw cotton equivalents. The net result (net imports) of processed cotton products provides an approximation of the amount of cotton coming into the United States from each region that is not being exempted or receiving a refund. Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data available and determined that processed cotton imports into the U.S. totaled 9,232 1 million pounds (North America, 3,116 million pounds; South America, 242 million pounds, Asia, 4,770 million pounds, Europe, 684 million pounds, Oceania, 41 million pounds, and Africa, 378 million pounds. U.S. processed cotton exports for the same time period and regions totaled 2,317 1 million 1 Total does not equal sum of regions due to rounding. VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 pounds (North America, 2,151 million pounds; South America, 45 million pounds; Asia 64 million pounds; Europe 45 million pounds; Oceania 5 million pounds; and Africa, 7 million pounds). Subtracting U.S. exports from U.S. imports results in total net imports of 6,915 1 million pounds (North America, 965 pounds; South America, 197 million pounds; Asia, 4,706 million pounds; Europe, 639 million pounds; Oceana, 36 million pounds; and Africa, 371 million pounds. Step 4. Adjust the U.S. cotton content of imports for location by multiplying the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for each region by that region’s share of total imports of assessable cotton and then totaling-up the result obtained across all the regions. The share of total imports of assessed cotton products is calculated by dividing the total assessed cotton contained in each regions’ imports as discussed in Step 3 above by the sum of all regions’ imports of assessed cotton. Step 5. The percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable imports is then PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 used to calculate the assessable content of imported cotton products by multiplying the cotton content of each imported product by the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable imports and subtracting that amount from the cotton content of imported products (assessable cotton content = cotton content per HTS code ¥ (cotton content per HTS code × proportion of U.S. cotton contained in U.S. imports) where the proportion of U.S. cotton contained in U.S. imports equals the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable imports divided by 100). Using the above method and the most current data available to AMS, the proposed rule would lower the total amount of assessments paid by importers for imported textile products by approximately 22.2 percent from the total amount of assessments paid by importers using current procedures. Raw cotton import assessments would increase by 26.7 percent based on the established formula. Exemptions and E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2037 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules refunds would continue to be provided for importers wishing to document the U.S. cotton content of specific goods. The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton containing products, and the supplemental assessment would continue to be calculated the same way. The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton containing products assessment is levied on the weight of cotton produced or imported at a rate of $1 per bale of cotton which is equivalent to 500 pounds or $1 per 226.8 kilograms of cotton. The supplemental assessment is levied at a rate of five-tenths of one percent of the value of domestically produced cotton, imported cotton, and the cotton content of imported products. AMS assigns the calendar year weighted average price received by U.S. farmers for Upland cotton to represent the value of imported cotton. The current value of imported cotton as published in the Federal Register (68 FR 27898) on May 22, 2003, for the purpose of calculating supplemental assessments on imported cotton is $0.7716 per kilogram. This number was calculated using the annual weighted average price received by farmers for Upland cotton during the calendar year 2002 which was $0.35 per pound and multiplying by the conversion factor 2.2046. Using the Average Weighted Price Received by U.S. farmers for Upland cotton for the calendar year 2003, which is $0.55 per pound, the new value of imported cotton is $1.2125 per kilogram. The proposed value is $.4409 per kilogram more than the previous value. The U.S. cotton share of total net imported products is approximated at 0.222. This figure was obtained by multiplying U.S. cotton’s share of each region’s mill use by that region’s share of assessable cotton imports. The U.S. content of assessable cotton imports for each supply region is shown in Table 2. TABLE 2.—TABULATION OF U.S. COTTON SHARE OF TOTAL ASSESSABLE U.S. COTTON IMPORTS U.S. share of foreign mill use Region Region share of assessable cotton imports U.S. cotton share of assessable imports North America .............................................................................................................................. South America ............................................................................................................................. Asia .............................................................................................................................................. Europe ......................................................................................................................................... Oceana ........................................................................................................................................ Africa ............................................................................................................................................ 1.000 0.160 0.099 0.116 0.000 0.002 0.140 0.028 0.681 0.092 0.005 0.054 0.140 0.004 0.067 0.011 0.000 0.000 Total ...................................................................................................................................... N.A. 1.000 0.222 An example of the complete assessment formula and how the various figures are obtained is as follows: One bale is equal to 500 pounds. One kilogram equals 2.2046 pounds. One pound equals 0.453597 kilograms. 1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 × .453597). $1 per bale assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or $0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8). 2. Supplemental Assessment of 5⁄10 of One Percent of the Value of the Cotton Converted to Kilograms The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 × 2.2046). Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals $0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 × .005). 3. Total Rate of Assessment The total rate of assessment per kilogram of raw cotton is $0.010472 per kg. (obtained by adding the $1 per bale equivalent assessment of $0.004409 per kg., and the supplemental assessment $0.006063 per kg.), and making an adjustment of 0.222 for the U.S. cotton content of assessed imported textile VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 products. The proposed total rate of assessment for imported cotton would be $0.008147 per kilogram. The current total rate of assessment on imported cotton is $0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate of assessment on imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year. The figures shown in the right hand column of the Import Assessment Table 1205.510(b)(3) are a result of such a calculation, and have been revised accordingly. These figures indicate the total assessment per kilogram due for each Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) number subject to assessment. A sixty-day comment period is provided to comment on the changes to the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations proposed herein. This period is deemed appropriate because this proposal would adjust the assessments paid by importers on imported raw cotton and cotton products under the Cotton Research and Promotion Order, by increasing the assessment on raw cotton and reducing the total rate of assessment for imported cotton products. These proposed changes would ensure that the total assessment collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of imported products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 cotton, and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not subject to more than one assessment. Accordingly, the change proposed in this rule, if adopted, should be implemented as soon as possible. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1205 Advertising, Agricultural research, Cotton, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble 7 CFR part 1205 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 1205—COTTON RESEARCH AND PROMOTION 1. The authority citation for part 1205 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118. 2. In § 1205.510, paragraph (b)(2) and the table in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) are revised to read as follows: § 1205.510 * Levy of assessments. * * * * (b) * * * (2) The 12-month average of monthly weighted average prices received by U.S. farmers will be calculated annually. Such weighted average will be used as the value of imported cotton for the purpose of levying the supplemental assessment on E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2038 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules imported cotton and will be expressed in kilograms. The value of imported cotton for the purpose of levying the supplemental assessment is $1.2125 per kilogram. The total rate of assessment VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 for imported raw cotton is $0.010472, and the total rate of assessment for imported cotton products is $0.008147 per kilogram. (3) * * * PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (ii) * * * BILLING CODE 3410–02–P E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2039 EP12ja05.000</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.001</GPH> 2040 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2041 EP12ja05.002</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.003</GPH> 2042 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2043 EP12ja05.004</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.005</GPH> 2044 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2045 EP12ja05.006</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.007</GPH> 2046 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2047 EP12ja05.008</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.009</GPH> 2048 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2049 EP12ja05.010</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.011</GPH> 2050 VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 2051 EP12ja05.012</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules VerDate jul<14>2003 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.013</GPH> 2052 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules * * * * Dated: January 5, 2005. A.J. Yates, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–475 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–C NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 40 [Docket No. PRM–40–28] Donald A. Barbour, Philotechnics; Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM–40–28) submitted by Mr. Donald A. Barbour, Philotechnics. The petitioner requested VerDate jul<14>2003 17:43 Jan 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 that the NRC amend its regulations governing the domestic licensing of source material to provide clarity regarding the effective control of depleted uranium aircraft counterweights held under the exemption in 10 CFR 40.13(c)(5). The petitioner believes that this amendment should address a number of issues concerning the exemption, storage, and disposal of these devices. ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition for rulemaking, the public comments received, and NRC’s letter to the petitioner may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, Public File Area Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. These documents also may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the rulemaking Web site at https://ruleforum.llnl.gov. Address questions about our rulemaking Web site to Carol Gallagher; (301) 415–5905; e-mail cag@nrc.gov. The NRC maintains an Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC’s public PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 documents. These documents may be accessed through the NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary C. Comfort, Jr., Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–8106, e-mail gcc1@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Petition On January 21, 2000 (65 FR 3394), the NRC published a notice of receipt of a petition for rulemaking filed by Donald A. Barbour, Philotechnics. The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to provide additional rules for the effective control of depleted uranium aircraft E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1 EP12ja05.014</GPH> * 2053

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2034-2053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1205

[Doc. No. CN-04-001]


Cotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental 
Assessment on Imports (2004 Amendments)

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to amend 
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations by adjusting the total rate of 
assessment per kilogram for imported cotton collected for use by the 
Cotton Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of 
assessment would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale 
equivalent assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting 
the sum to account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in 
imported textile products. The proposed adjustment would reduce the 
assessable portion of the cotton content of imported textile products 
by the estimated average amount of U.S. cotton contained therein. 
Exemptions and refunds would continue to be provided for importers 
wishing to document the U.S. cotton content of specific goods. The 
proposed rule would continue to ensure that the total assessment 
collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of imported 
products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced cotton, 
and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not subject to 
more than one assessment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this proposed rule to Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy 
Administrator, Cotton Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, 
1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 0224 Washington, DC 20250-0224. 
Comments should be submitted in triplicate. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically to: http:www.cottoncomments@usda.gov">//www.cottoncomments@usda.gov or 
https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the docket 
number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
Register. All comments received will be made available for public 
inspection at Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, Room 2641-S, 1400 Independence 
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250 during regular business hours. A copy 
of this notice may be found at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/
rulemaking.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy 
Administrator, Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., 
Stop 0224, Washington, DC 20250-0224, telephone (202) 720-2259, 
facsimile (202) 690-1718, or e-mail at whitney.rick@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process 
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
This proposed rule would not preempt any State or local laws, 
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
conflict with this rule.
    The Cotton Research and Promotion Act provides that administrative 
proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. 
Under Section 12 of the Act, any person subject to an order may file 
with the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provision of 
the plan, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not 
in accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order or to 
be exempted therefrom. Such person is afforded the opportunity for a 
hearing on the petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on 
the petition. The Act provides that the District Court of the United 
States in any district in which the person is an inhabitant, or has his 
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
ruling, provided a complaint is filed within 20 days from the date of 
the entry of ruling.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) AMS has considered the economic impact 
of this action on small entities and has determined that its 
implementation will not have a

[[Page 2035]]

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
businesses.
    There are an estimated 10,000 importers who are presently subject 
to rules and regulations issued pursuant to the Cotton Research and 
Promotion Order. The majority of these importers are small businesses 
under the criteria established by the Small Business Administration.
    The proposed rule would reduce the total rate of assessment per 
kilogram for imported cotton products collected for use by the Cotton 
Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of assessment 
would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale equivalent 
assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting the sum to 
account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in imported 
textile products. The proposed adjustment to the sum would reduce the 
assessable portion of the cotton content of imported products by 22.2 
percent, the current average estimated by AMS of U.S. cotton contained 
therein. The proposed total rate of assessment per kilogram for 
imported raw cotton and cotton textile products would be calculated 
using the following formula:

1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms

    A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 x .453597). $1 per bale 
assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or $0.004409 per kg. (1/
226.8).

2. Supplemental Assessment of \5/10\ of One Percent of the Value of the 
Cotton Converted to Kilograms

    The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers 
for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 x 
2.2046). Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals 
$0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 x .005).

3. Adjustment for U.S. Cotton Content of Imported Products

    The adjustment for the U.S. cotton content of assessed imports is 
obtained by multiplying the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above by the U.S. 
cotton share of total net cotton textile imports (0.222) which equals 
$0.002325 per kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. x 0.222). Subtracting this 
amount from the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above would equal the proposed 
total rate of assessment for imported products of $0.008147 per 
kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. - $0.002325 per kg. = $0.008147).
    The current total rate of assessment on imported raw cotton and 
imported cotton products is $0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule 
would increase the assessment on raw cotton to $0.010472, an increase 
of $0.002205. Even though the assessment would be raised for imported 
raw cotton, the increase is small and will not significantly affect 
small businesses. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate of 
assessment for imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a 
decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year. The proposed rule 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
importers of cotton and cotton-containing products because importers 
would be paying a small increase on imported raw cotton and a reduced 
rate of total assessment on imported cotton products.

Paperwork Reduction

    In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the information collection 
requirements contained in the regulation to be amended have been 
previously approved by OMB and were assigned control number 0581-0093.

Background

    The Cotton Research and Promotion Act (Act), as amended, 7 U.S.C. 
2101 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1966. Congress intended the 
Act to:

[E]nable the establishment of an orderly procedure for the 
development, financing through adequate assessments on all cotton 
marketed in the United States and on imports of cotton, and carrying 
out an effective and continuous coordinated program of research and 
promotion designed to strengthen cotton's competitive position and 
to maintain and expand domestic and foreign markets and uses for 
United States cotton.

    7 U.S.C. 2101.

    The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture 
to issue a Cotton Research and Promotion Order. An amended Order was 
approved by producers and importers voting in a referendum held July 
17-26, 1991. The amended Order was published in the Federal Register on 
December 10, 1991 (56 FR 64470). A proposed rule implementing the 
amended Order was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 
1991 (56 FR 65450). Implementing rules were published on July 1 and 2, 
1992, (57 FR 29181) and (57 FR 29431), respectively. The Order imposes 
an assessment on the production and importation of cotton in order to 
pay for the generic research and promotion projects authorized by the 
Act. The assessment consists of two parts, an assessment of $1 per bale 
of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton containing products, and a 
supplemental assessment tied to the value of cotton.
    The Act requires the Secretary to establish procedures to ensure 
that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not subject 
to more than one assessment. Under the current procedures established 
in the regulations, an importer may receive an exemption from paying 
the assessment or a reimbursement of the assessment paid by submitting 
sufficient documentation to the Board to verify the U.S. cotton content 
of the products to be imported or already imported. Because foreign 
mills frequently mix U.S. cotton with other cottons when formulating 
cotton yarns and fabrics, the ability of importers, except those 
purchasing products from mills that use only U.S. cotton, to verify 
through documentation the U.S. cotton content of the products they are 
importing may be limited.
    AMS believes that changes in the composition of U.S. cotton use and 
the upcoming completion of the removal of all U.S. import quotas on 
textile manufactures as outlined in the Agreement on Textile and 
Clothing necessitates a change to its current regulatory procedures for 
ensuring that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not 
subject to more than one assessment. Prior to the 2001/2002 crop year, 
the majority of U.S. (upland) cotton (58 percent in the 2000/2001 crop 
year) was consumed domestically by U.S. mills. Starting with the 2001/
2002 crop year, a majority of U.S. cotton was exported (67 percent in 
2003/2004). AMS expects this shift in the composition of U.S. cotton 
use to continue into the foreseeable future and that the ending of U.S. 
textile quotas will lead to an increase in the amount of U.S. cotton 
returning to the United States in cotton product imports. AMS, 
therefore, believes that it is appropriate at this time to make an 
adjustment to the total rate of assessment to account for the amount of 
U.S. cotton content of imported textile products.
    The estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable 
cotton imports would be calculated by multiplying the U.S. cotton 
export share of foreign mill use adjusted for location by assessable 
imports. Adjusting the average amount of U.S. cotton contained in total 
cotton imports for location would ensure that the U.S. cotton content 
of total cotton imports would properly account for differences among 
supplying countries with respect to U.S. cotton's share of their cotton 
mill use and in their share of U.S. cotton product imports.

[[Page 2036]]

    AMS will use regularly published statistics on U.S. exports by 
destination (Weekly Export Sales Report), the world's textile usage of 
cotton by country (Foreign Agricultural Service Cotton Circular) and 
the raw cotton equivalent contained in imports and exports of textile 
manufactures by country (Cotton & Wool Outlook) in the calculations of 
the U.S. content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products. AMS 
would determine the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total 
assessable cotton imports as follows:
    Step 1. Define six non-U.S. cotton product supply regions: (i) 
North America: Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, 
El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, 
Panama, (ii) South America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, 
Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, (iii) Asia: China, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, 
Malaysia, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, 
Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, (iv) Europe: Belgium, France, Germany, 
Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Turkey, (v) Oceania: 
Australia, and (vi) Africa: Ivory Coast, Morocco, Nigeria, South 
Africa. These six regions coincide with the six regions used by the 
USDA's Economic Research Service in its reporting of U.S. cotton 
textile imports.
    Step 2. Calculate the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for 
each region by dividing total U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region 
by total mill consumption of raw cotton in that region. This would 
represent an approximation of the percentage of U.S. cotton contained 
in all cotton products imported into the United States from that 
region. For the purpose of this calculation, U.S. cotton content 
contained in a region's cotton products is uniformly distributed across 
each product manufactured in that region.
    Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data 
available and determined that U.S. cotton's share of non-U.S. mill use 
for each region was as follows: North America, 100.0 percent; South 
America, 16.0 percent; Asia, 9.9 percent; Europe, 11.6 percent; Oceana, 
0.0 percent; and Africa, 0.2 percent. These shares were obtained by 
dividing U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region by total cotton mill 
use in each region. The specific calculations are shown in Table 1.

                      Table 1.--Tabulation of U.S. Cotton Export Share of Foreign Mill Use
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Raw cotton
                                                                                    mill use--      U.S. cotton
                             Region                                U.S. exports     million 480    share of raw
                                                                   of raw cotton    lb. Bales--     cotton mill
                                                                                                        use
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North America...................................................           2.842           2.767       \a\ 1.000
South America...................................................           0.833           5.207           0.160
Asia............................................................           6.481          65.254           0.099
Europe..........................................................           1.757          15.103           0.116
Oceana..........................................................           0.000           0.125           0.000
Africa..........................................................           0.006           2.876          0.002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North America share capped at 1.000.

    Step 3. Determine total imports of assessable cotton for each 
region by subtracting the total cotton content of U.S. exports of 
processed cotton products in raw cotton equivalents to each region from 
the total cotton content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products 
from that region in raw cotton equivalents. The net result (net 
imports) of processed cotton products provides an approximation of the 
amount of cotton coming into the United States from each region that is 
not being exempted or receiving a refund.
    Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data 
available and determined that processed cotton imports into the U.S. 
totaled 9,232 \1\ million pounds (North America, 3,116 million pounds; 
South America, 242 million pounds, Asia, 4,770 million pounds, Europe, 
684 million pounds, Oceania, 41 million pounds, and Africa, 378 million 
pounds. U.S. processed cotton exports for the same time period and 
regions totaled 2,317 \1\ million pounds (North America, 2,151 million 
pounds; South America, 45 million pounds; Asia 64 million pounds; 
Europe 45 million pounds; Oceania 5 million pounds; and Africa, 7 
million pounds). Subtracting U.S. exports from U.S. imports results in 
total net imports of 6,915 \1\ million pounds (North America, 965 
pounds; South America, 197 million pounds; Asia, 4,706 million pounds; 
Europe, 639 million pounds; Oceana, 36 million pounds; and Africa, 371 
million pounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Total does not equal sum of regions due to rounding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Step 4. Adjust the U.S. cotton content of imports for location by 
multiplying the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for each region 
by that region's share of total imports of assessable cotton and then 
totaling-up the result obtained across all the regions. The share of 
total imports of assessed cotton products is calculated by dividing the 
total assessed cotton contained in each regions' imports as discussed 
in Step 3 above by the sum of all regions' imports of assessed cotton.
    Step 5. The percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable 
imports is then used to calculate the assessable content of imported 
cotton products by multiplying the cotton content of each imported 
product by the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable 
imports and subtracting that amount from the cotton content of imported 
products (assessable cotton content = cotton content per HTS code - 
(cotton content per HTS code x proportion of U.S. cotton contained in 
U.S. imports) where the proportion of U.S. cotton contained in U.S. 
imports equals the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable 
imports divided by 100).
    Using the above method and the most current data available to AMS, 
the proposed rule would lower the total amount of assessments paid by 
importers for imported textile products by approximately 22.2 percent 
from the total amount of assessments paid by importers using current 
procedures. Raw cotton import assessments would increase by 26.7 
percent based on the established formula. Exemptions and

[[Page 2037]]

refunds would continue to be provided for importers wishing to document 
the U.S. cotton content of specific goods.
    The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton 
containing products, and the supplemental assessment would continue to 
be calculated the same way. The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale 
equivalent of cotton containing products assessment is levied on the 
weight of cotton produced or imported at a rate of $1 per bale of 
cotton which is equivalent to 500 pounds or $1 per 226.8 kilograms of 
cotton.
    The supplemental assessment is levied at a rate of five-tenths of 
one percent of the value of domestically produced cotton, imported 
cotton, and the cotton content of imported products. AMS assigns the 
calendar year weighted average price received by U.S. farmers for 
Upland cotton to represent the value of imported cotton. The current 
value of imported cotton as published in the Federal Register (68 FR 
27898) on May 22, 2003, for the purpose of calculating supplemental 
assessments on imported cotton is $0.7716 per kilogram. This number was 
calculated using the annual weighted average price received by farmers 
for Upland cotton during the calendar year 2002 which was $0.35 per 
pound and multiplying by the conversion factor 2.2046. Using the 
Average Weighted Price Received by U.S. farmers for Upland cotton for 
the calendar year 2003, which is $0.55 per pound, the new value of 
imported cotton is $1.2125 per kilogram. The proposed value is $.4409 
per kilogram more than the previous value.
    The U.S. cotton share of total net imported products is 
approximated at 0.222. This figure was obtained by multiplying U.S. 
cotton's share of each region's mill use by that region's share of 
assessable cotton imports. The U.S. content of assessable cotton 
imports for each supply region is shown in Table 2.

                Table 2.--Tabulation of U.S. Cotton Share of Total Assessable U.S. Cotton Imports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                    U.S. cotton
                                                                   U.S. share of   Region share      share of
                             Region                                foreign mill    of assessable    assessable
                                                                        use       cotton imports      imports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North America...................................................           1.000           0.140           0.140
South America...................................................           0.160           0.028           0.004
Asia............................................................           0.099           0.681           0.067
Europe..........................................................           0.116           0.092           0.011
Oceana..........................................................           0.000           0.005           0.000
Africa..........................................................           0.002           0.054           0.000
                                                                 -----------------
    Total.......................................................            N.A.           1.000           0.222
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An example of the complete assessment formula and how the various 
figures are obtained is as follows:
    One bale is equal to 500 pounds.
    One kilogram equals 2.2046 pounds.
    One pound equals 0.453597 kilograms.

1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms

    A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 x .453597).
    $1 per bale assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or 
$0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8).

2. Supplemental Assessment of \5/10\ of One Percent of the Value of the 
Cotton Converted to Kilograms

    The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers 
for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 x 
2.2046).
    Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals 
$0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 x .005).

3. Total Rate of Assessment

    The total rate of assessment per kilogram of raw cotton is 
$0.010472 per kg. (obtained by adding the $1 per bale equivalent 
assessment of $0.004409 per kg., and the supplemental assessment 
$0.006063 per kg.), and making an adjustment of 0.222 for the U.S. 
cotton content of assessed imported textile products. The proposed 
total rate of assessment for imported cotton would be $0.008147 per 
kilogram. The current total rate of assessment on imported cotton is 
$0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate 
of assessment on imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a 
decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year.
    The figures shown in the right hand column of the Import Assessment 
Table 1205.510(b)(3) are a result of such a calculation, and have been 
revised accordingly. These figures indicate the total assessment per 
kilogram due for each Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) number subject 
to assessment.
    A sixty-day comment period is provided to comment on the changes to 
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations proposed herein. This period is 
deemed appropriate because this proposal would adjust the assessments 
paid by importers on imported raw cotton and cotton products under the 
Cotton Research and Promotion Order, by increasing the assessment on 
raw cotton and reducing the total rate of assessment for imported 
cotton products. These proposed changes would ensure that the total 
assessment collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of 
imported products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced 
cotton, and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not 
subject to more than one assessment.
    Accordingly, the change proposed in this rule, if adopted, should 
be implemented as soon as possible.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1205

    Advertising, Agricultural research, Cotton, Marketing agreements, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble 7 CFR part 1205 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 1205--COTTON RESEARCH AND PROMOTION

    1. The authority citation for part 1205 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101-2118.

    2. In Sec.  1205.510, paragraph (b)(2) and the table in paragraph 
(b)(3)(ii) are revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1205.510  Levy of assessments.

* * * * *
    (b) * * * (2) The 12-month average of monthly weighted average 
prices received by U.S. farmers will be calculated annually. Such 
weighted average will be used as the value of imported cotton for the 
purpose of levying the supplemental assessment on

[[Page 2038]]

imported cotton and will be expressed in kilograms. The value of 
imported cotton for the purpose of levying the supplemental assessment 
is $1.2125 per kilogram. The total rate of assessment for imported raw 
cotton is $0.010472, and the total rate of assessment for imported 
cotton products is $0.008147 per kilogram.
    (3) * * *
    (ii) * * *
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

[[Page 2039]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.000


[[Page 2040]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.001


[[Page 2041]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.002


[[Page 2042]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.003


[[Page 2043]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.004


[[Page 2044]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.005


[[Page 2045]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.006


[[Page 2046]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.007


[[Page 2047]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.008


[[Page 2048]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.009


[[Page 2049]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.010


[[Page 2050]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.011


[[Page 2051]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.012


[[Page 2052]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.013


[[Page 2053]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.014

* * * * *

    Dated: January 5, 2005.
A.J. Yates,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-475 Filed 1-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-C
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.