Cotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental Assessment on Imports (2004 Amendments), 2034-2053 [05-475]
Download as PDF
2034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
its constituents equitably, both
geographically and on a volume basis.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1160
Fluid milk, Milk, Promotion.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR part
1160 be amended as follows:
Dated: January 5, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05–580 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 1160—FLUID MILK PROMOTION
PROGRAM
Agricultural Marketing Service
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
Part 1160 continues to read as follows:
7 CFR Part 1205
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6401–6417.
[Doc. No. CN–04–001]
2. In § 1160.200, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
Cotton Board Rules and Regulations:
Adjusting Supplemental Assessment
on Imports (2004 Amendments)
§ 1160.200 Establishment and
membership.
AGENCY:
(a) There is hereby established a
National Fluid Milk Processor
Promotion Board of 20 members, 15 of
whom shall represent geographic
regions and five of whom shall be atlarge members of the Board. To the
extent practicable, members
representing geographic regions shall
represent fluid milk processing
operations of differing sizes. No fluid
milk processor shall be represented on
the Board by more than three members.
The at-large members shall include at
least three fluid milk processors and at
least one member from the general
public. Except for the non-processor
member or members from the general
public, nominees appointed to the
Board must be active owners or
employees of a fluid milk processor.
The failure of such a member to own or
work for such fluid milk processor shall
disqualify that member for membership
on the Board except that such member
shall continue to serve on the Board for
a period not to exceed 6 months
following the disqualification or until
appointment of a successor Board
member to such position, whichever is
sooner, provided that such person
continues to meet the criteria for serving
on the Board as a processor
representative. Should a member
representing the general public cease to
be employed by the entity employing
that member when appointed, gain
employment with a new employer, or
cease to own or operate the business
which that member owned or operated
at the date of appointment, such
member shall be disqualified for
membership on the Board, except that
such member shall continue to serve on
the Board for a period not to exceed 6
months, or until appointment of a
successor Board member, whichever is
sooner.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations
by adjusting the total rate of assessment
per kilogram for imported cotton
collected for use by the Cotton Research
and Promotion Program. The proposed
total rate of assessment would be
calculated by adding together the $1 per
bale equivalent assessment and the
supplemental assessment, and adjusting
the sum to account for the estimated
amount of U.S. cotton contained in
imported textile products. The proposed
adjustment would reduce the assessable
portion of the cotton content of
imported textile products by the
estimated average amount of U.S. cotton
contained therein. Exemptions and
refunds would continue to be provided
for importers wishing to document the
U.S. cotton content of specific goods.
The proposed rule would continue to
ensure that the total assessment
collected on imported cotton and the
cotton content of imported products
remain similar to those paid on
domestically produced cotton, and that
the U.S. cotton content of imported
products is not subject to more than one
assessment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule to
Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy
Administrator, Cotton Program,
Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA,
1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP
0224 Washington, DC 20250–0224.
Comments should be submitted in
triplicate. Comments may also be
submitted electronically to: https://
www.cottoncomments@usda.gov or
https://www.regulations.gov. All
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register. All
comments received will be made
available for public inspection at Cotton
Program, AMS, USDA, Room 2641–S,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250 during regular
business hours. A copy of this notice
may be found at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/
rulemaking.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy
Administrator, Cotton Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Stop 0224, Washington, DC 20250–
0224, telephone (202) 720–2259,
facsimile (202) 690–1718, or e-mail at
whitney.rick@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This proposed
rule would not preempt any State or
local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Cotton Research and Promotion
Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
Section 12 of the Act, any person
subject to an order may file with the
Secretary a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the plan, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and requesting a modification of the
order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
person is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, the Secretary would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
District Court of the United States in
any district in which the person is an
inhabitant, or has his principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review the
Secretary’s ruling, provided a complaint
is filed within 20 days from the date of
the entry of ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities and has determined that
its implementation will not have a
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
There are an estimated 10,000
importers who are presently subject to
rules and regulations issued pursuant to
the Cotton Research and Promotion
Order. The majority of these importers
are small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration.
The proposed rule would reduce the
total rate of assessment per kilogram for
imported cotton products collected for
use by the Cotton Research and
Promotion Program. The proposed total
rate of assessment would be calculated
by adding together the $1 per bale
equivalent assessment and the
supplemental assessment, and adjusting
the sum to account for the estimated
amount of U.S. cotton contained in
imported textile products. The proposed
adjustment to the sum would reduce the
assessable portion of the cotton content
of imported products by 22.2 percent,
the current average estimated by AMS of
U.S. cotton contained therein. The
proposed total rate of assessment per
kilogram for imported raw cotton and
cotton textile products would be
calculated using the following formula:
increase the assessment on raw cotton to
$0.010472, an increase of $0.002205.
Even though the assessment would be
raised for imported raw cotton, the
increase is small and will not
significantly affect small businesses.
The proposed rule would decrease the
total rate of assessment for imported
cotton products to $0.008147 per
kilogram, a decrease of $0.00012 per
kilogram from last year. The proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of importers of cotton and
cotton-containing products because
importers would be paying a small
increase on imported raw cotton and a
reduced rate of total assessment on
imported cotton products.
1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment
Converted to Kilograms
A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg.
(500 × .453597). $1 per bale assessment
equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or
$0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8).
Background
The Cotton Research and Promotion
Act (Act), as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2101 et
seq., was enacted by Congress in 1966.
Congress intended the Act to:
2. Supplemental Assessment of ⁄ of
One Percent of the Value of the Cotton
Converted to Kilograms
The 2003 calendar year weighted
average price received by producers for
Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or
$1.2125 per kg. (0.55 × 2.2046). Five
tenths of one percent of the average
price in kg. equals $0.006063 per kg.
(1.2125 × .005).
5 10
3. Adjustment for U.S. Cotton Content of
Imported Products
The adjustment for the U.S. cotton
content of assessed imports is obtained
by multiplying the sum of Nos. 1 and 2
above by the U.S. cotton share of total
net cotton textile imports (0.222) which
equals $0.002325 per kilogram
($0.010472 per kg. × 0.222). Subtracting
this amount from the sum of Nos. 1 and
2 above would equal the proposed total
rate of assessment for imported products
of $0.008147 per kilogram ($0.010472
per kg. ¥ $0.002325 per kg. =
$0.008147).
The current total rate of assessment
on imported raw cotton and imported
cotton products is $0.008267 per
kilogram. The proposed rule would
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Paperwork Reduction
In compliance with Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which
implement the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the
information collection requirements
contained in the regulation to be
amended have been previously
approved by OMB and were assigned
control number 0581–0093.
[E]nable the establishment of an orderly
procedure for the development, financing
through adequate assessments on all cotton
marketed in the United States and on imports
of cotton, and carrying out an effective and
continuous coordinated program of research
and promotion designed to strengthen
cotton’s competitive position and to maintain
and expand domestic and foreign markets
and uses for United States cotton.
7 U.S.C. 2101.
The Act authorizes the Secretary of
the Department of Agriculture to issue
a Cotton Research and Promotion Order.
An amended Order was approved by
producers and importers voting in a
referendum held July 17–26, 1991. The
amended Order was published in the
Federal Register on December 10, 1991
(56 FR 64470). A proposed rule
implementing the amended Order was
published in the Federal Register on
December 17, 1991 (56 FR 65450).
Implementing rules were published on
July 1 and 2, 1992, (57 FR 29181) and
(57 FR 29431), respectively. The Order
imposes an assessment on the
production and importation of cotton in
order to pay for the generic research and
promotion projects authorized by the
Act. The assessment consists of two
parts, an assessment of $1 per bale of
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2035
cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton
containing products, and a
supplemental assessment tied to the
value of cotton.
The Act requires the Secretary to
establish procedures to ensure that U.S.
(upland) cotton content of imported
products is not subject to more than one
assessment. Under the current
procedures established in the
regulations, an importer may receive an
exemption from paying the assessment
or a reimbursement of the assessment
paid by submitting sufficient
documentation to the Board to verify the
U.S. cotton content of the products to be
imported or already imported. Because
foreign mills frequently mix U.S. cotton
with other cottons when formulating
cotton yarns and fabrics, the ability of
importers, except those purchasing
products from mills that use only U.S.
cotton, to verify through documentation
the U.S. cotton content of the products
they are importing may be limited.
AMS believes that changes in the
composition of U.S. cotton use and the
upcoming completion of the removal of
all U.S. import quotas on textile
manufactures as outlined in the
Agreement on Textile and Clothing
necessitates a change to its current
regulatory procedures for ensuring that
U.S. (upland) cotton content of
imported products is not subject to more
than one assessment. Prior to the 2001/
2002 crop year, the majority of U.S.
(upland) cotton (58 percent in the 2000/
2001 crop year) was consumed
domestically by U.S. mills. Starting with
the 2001/2002 crop year, a majority of
U.S. cotton was exported (67 percent in
2003/2004). AMS expects this shift in
the composition of U.S. cotton use to
continue into the foreseeable future and
that the ending of U.S. textile quotas
will lead to an increase in the amount
of U.S. cotton returning to the United
States in cotton product imports. AMS,
therefore, believes that it is appropriate
at this time to make an adjustment to
the total rate of assessment to account
for the amount of U.S. cotton content of
imported textile products.
The estimated amount of U.S. cotton
contained in total assessable cotton
imports would be calculated by
multiplying the U.S. cotton export share
of foreign mill use adjusted for location
by assessable imports. Adjusting the
average amount of U.S. cotton contained
in total cotton imports for location
would ensure that the U.S. cotton
content of total cotton imports would
properly account for differences among
supplying countries with respect to U.S.
cotton’s share of their cotton mill use
and in their share of U.S. cotton product
imports.
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2036
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
AMS will use regularly published
statistics on U.S. exports by destination
(Weekly Export Sales Report), the
world’s textile usage of cotton by
country (Foreign Agricultural Service
Cotton Circular) and the raw cotton
equivalent contained in imports and
exports of textile manufactures by
country (Cotton & Wool Outlook) in the
calculations of the U.S. content of U.S.
imports of processed cotton products.
AMS would determine the percentage of
U.S. cotton contained in total assessable
cotton imports as follows:
Step 1. Define six non-U.S. cotton
product supply regions: (i) North
America: Bahamas, Belize, Canada,
Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,
Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama,
(ii) South America: Argentina, Brazil,
Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru,
Venezuela, (iii) Asia: China, Hong Kong,
Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines,
Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea,
Sri Lanka, Taiwan, United Arab
Emirates, (iv) Europe: Belgium, France,
Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands,
Poland, Spain, Turkey, (v) Oceania:
Australia, and (vi) Africa: Ivory Coast,
Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa. These
six regions coincide with the six regions
used by the USDA’s Economic Research
Service in its reporting of U.S. cotton
textile imports.
Step 2. Calculate the U.S. cotton share
of foreign mill use for each region by
dividing total U.S. exports of raw cotton
to each region by total mill consumption
of raw cotton in that region. This would
represent an approximation of the
percentage of U.S. cotton contained in
all cotton products imported into the
United States from that region. For the
purpose of this calculation, U.S. cotton
content contained in a region’s cotton
products is uniformly distributed across
each product manufactured in that
region.
Under the proposed rule, AMS
examined the most current data
available and determined that U.S.
cotton’s share of non-U.S. mill use for
each region was as follows: North
America, 100.0 percent; South America,
16.0 percent; Asia, 9.9 percent; Europe,
11.6 percent; Oceana, 0.0 percent; and
Africa, 0.2 percent. These shares were
obtained by dividing U.S. exports of raw
cotton to each region by total cotton mill
use in each region. The specific
calculations are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.—TABULATION OF U.S. COTTON EXPORT SHARE OF FOREIGN MILL USE
U.S. exports of
raw cotton
Region
Raw cotton
mill use—million 480 lb.
Bales—
2.842
0.833
6.481
1.757
0.000
0.006
2.767
5.207
65.254
15.103
0.125
2.876
North America ..............................................................................................................................
South America .............................................................................................................................
Asia ..............................................................................................................................................
Europe .........................................................................................................................................
Oceana ........................................................................................................................................
Africa ............................................................................................................................................
a North
U.S. cotton
share of raw
cotton mill use
a 1.000
0.160
0.099
0.116
0.000
0.002
America share capped at 1.000.
Step 3. Determine total imports of
assessable cotton for each region by
subtracting the total cotton content of
U.S. exports of processed cotton
products in raw cotton equivalents to
each region from the total cotton content
of U.S. imports of processed cotton
products from that region in raw cotton
equivalents. The net result (net imports)
of processed cotton products provides
an approximation of the amount of
cotton coming into the United States
from each region that is not being
exempted or receiving a refund.
Under the proposed rule, AMS
examined the most current data
available and determined that processed
cotton imports into the U.S. totaled
9,232 1 million pounds (North America,
3,116 million pounds; South America,
242 million pounds, Asia, 4,770 million
pounds, Europe, 684 million pounds,
Oceania, 41 million pounds, and Africa,
378 million pounds. U.S. processed
cotton exports for the same time period
and regions totaled 2,317 1 million
1 Total does not equal sum of regions due to
rounding.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
pounds (North America, 2,151 million
pounds; South America, 45 million
pounds; Asia 64 million pounds; Europe
45 million pounds; Oceania 5 million
pounds; and Africa, 7 million pounds).
Subtracting U.S. exports from U.S.
imports results in total net imports of
6,915 1 million pounds (North America,
965 pounds; South America, 197
million pounds; Asia, 4,706 million
pounds; Europe, 639 million pounds;
Oceana, 36 million pounds; and Africa,
371 million pounds.
Step 4. Adjust the U.S. cotton content
of imports for location by multiplying
the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use
for each region by that region’s share of
total imports of assessable cotton and
then totaling-up the result obtained
across all the regions. The share of total
imports of assessed cotton products is
calculated by dividing the total assessed
cotton contained in each regions’
imports as discussed in Step 3 above by
the sum of all regions’ imports of
assessed cotton.
Step 5. The percentage of U.S. cotton
contained in assessable imports is then
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
used to calculate the assessable content
of imported cotton products by
multiplying the cotton content of each
imported product by the percentage of
U.S. cotton contained in total assessable
imports and subtracting that amount
from the cotton content of imported
products (assessable cotton content =
cotton content per HTS code ¥ (cotton
content per HTS code × proportion of
U.S. cotton contained in U.S. imports)
where the proportion of U.S. cotton
contained in U.S. imports equals the
percentage of U.S. cotton contained in
assessable imports divided by 100).
Using the above method and the most
current data available to AMS, the
proposed rule would lower the total
amount of assessments paid by
importers for imported textile products
by approximately 22.2 percent from the
total amount of assessments paid by
importers using current procedures.
Raw cotton import assessments would
increase by 26.7 percent based on the
established formula. Exemptions and
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2037
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
refunds would continue to be provided
for importers wishing to document the
U.S. cotton content of specific goods.
The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale
equivalent of cotton containing
products, and the supplemental
assessment would continue to be
calculated the same way. The $1 per
bale of cotton or per bale equivalent of
cotton containing products assessment
is levied on the weight of cotton
produced or imported at a rate of $1 per
bale of cotton which is equivalent to 500
pounds or $1 per 226.8 kilograms of
cotton.
The supplemental assessment is
levied at a rate of five-tenths of one
percent of the value of domestically
produced cotton, imported cotton, and
the cotton content of imported products.
AMS assigns the calendar year weighted
average price received by U.S. farmers
for Upland cotton to represent the value
of imported cotton. The current value of
imported cotton as published in the
Federal Register (68 FR 27898) on May
22, 2003, for the purpose of calculating
supplemental assessments on imported
cotton is $0.7716 per kilogram. This
number was calculated using the annual
weighted average price received by
farmers for Upland cotton during the
calendar year 2002 which was $0.35 per
pound and multiplying by the
conversion factor 2.2046. Using the
Average Weighted Price Received by
U.S. farmers for Upland cotton for the
calendar year 2003, which is $0.55 per
pound, the new value of imported
cotton is $1.2125 per kilogram. The
proposed value is $.4409 per kilogram
more than the previous value.
The U.S. cotton share of total net
imported products is approximated at
0.222. This figure was obtained by
multiplying U.S. cotton’s share of each
region’s mill use by that region’s share
of assessable cotton imports. The U.S.
content of assessable cotton imports for
each supply region is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2.—TABULATION OF U.S. COTTON SHARE OF TOTAL ASSESSABLE U.S. COTTON IMPORTS
U.S. share of
foreign mill
use
Region
Region share
of assessable
cotton imports
U.S. cotton
share of
assessable
imports
North America ..............................................................................................................................
South America .............................................................................................................................
Asia ..............................................................................................................................................
Europe .........................................................................................................................................
Oceana ........................................................................................................................................
Africa ............................................................................................................................................
1.000
0.160
0.099
0.116
0.000
0.002
0.140
0.028
0.681
0.092
0.005
0.054
0.140
0.004
0.067
0.011
0.000
0.000
Total ......................................................................................................................................
N.A.
1.000
0.222
An example of the complete
assessment formula and how the various
figures are obtained is as follows:
One bale is equal to 500 pounds.
One kilogram equals 2.2046 pounds.
One pound equals 0.453597
kilograms.
1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment
Converted to Kilograms
A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg.
(500 × .453597).
$1 per bale assessment equals
$0.002000 per pound (1/500) or
$0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8).
2. Supplemental Assessment of 5⁄10 of
One Percent of the Value of the Cotton
Converted to Kilograms
The 2003 calendar year weighted
average price received by producers for
Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or
$1.2125 per kg. (0.55 × 2.2046).
Five tenths of one percent of the
average price in kg. equals $0.006063
per kg. (1.2125 × .005).
3. Total Rate of Assessment
The total rate of assessment per
kilogram of raw cotton is $0.010472 per
kg. (obtained by adding the $1 per bale
equivalent assessment of $0.004409 per
kg., and the supplemental assessment
$0.006063 per kg.), and making an
adjustment of 0.222 for the U.S. cotton
content of assessed imported textile
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
products. The proposed total rate of
assessment for imported cotton would
be $0.008147 per kilogram. The current
total rate of assessment on imported
cotton is $0.008267 per kilogram. The
proposed rule would decrease the total
rate of assessment on imported cotton
products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a
decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from
last year.
The figures shown in the right hand
column of the Import Assessment Table
1205.510(b)(3) are a result of such a
calculation, and have been revised
accordingly. These figures indicate the
total assessment per kilogram due for
each Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS)
number subject to assessment.
A sixty-day comment period is
provided to comment on the changes to
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations
proposed herein. This period is deemed
appropriate because this proposal
would adjust the assessments paid by
importers on imported raw cotton and
cotton products under the Cotton
Research and Promotion Order, by
increasing the assessment on raw cotton
and reducing the total rate of assessment
for imported cotton products. These
proposed changes would ensure that the
total assessment collected on imported
cotton and the cotton content of
imported products remain similar to
those paid on domestically produced
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
cotton, and that the U.S. cotton content
of imported products is not subject to
more than one assessment.
Accordingly, the change proposed in
this rule, if adopted, should be
implemented as soon as possible.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1205
Advertising, Agricultural research,
Cotton, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble 7 CFR part 1205 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1205—COTTON RESEARCH
AND PROMOTION
1. The authority citation for part 1205
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118.
2. In § 1205.510, paragraph (b)(2) and
the table in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 1205.510
*
Levy of assessments.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * (2) The 12-month average of
monthly weighted average prices
received by U.S. farmers will be
calculated annually. Such weighted
average will be used as the value of
imported cotton for the purpose of
levying the supplemental assessment on
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2038
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
imported cotton and will be expressed
in kilograms. The value of imported
cotton for the purpose of levying the
supplemental assessment is $1.2125 per
kilogram. The total rate of assessment
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
for imported raw cotton is $0.010472,
and the total rate of assessment for
imported cotton products is $0.008147
per kilogram.
(3) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) * * *
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2039
EP12ja05.000
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.001
2040
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2041
EP12ja05.002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.003
2042
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2043
EP12ja05.004
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.005
2044
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2045
EP12ja05.006
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.007
2046
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2047
EP12ja05.008
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.009
2048
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2049
EP12ja05.010
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.011
2050
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
2051
EP12ja05.012
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.013
2052
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 5, 2005.
A.J. Yates,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–475 Filed 1–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–C
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 40
[Docket No. PRM–40–28]
Donald A. Barbour, Philotechnics;
Denial of Petition for Rulemaking
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Denial of petition for
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is denying a petition
for rulemaking (PRM–40–28) submitted
by Mr. Donald A. Barbour,
Philotechnics. The petitioner requested
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:43 Jan 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
that the NRC amend its regulations
governing the domestic licensing of
source material to provide clarity
regarding the effective control of
depleted uranium aircraft
counterweights held under the
exemption in 10 CFR 40.13(c)(5). The
petitioner believes that this amendment
should address a number of issues
concerning the exemption, storage, and
disposal of these devices.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition for
rulemaking, the public comments
received, and NRC’s letter to the
petitioner may be examined at the NRC
Public Document Room, Public File
Area Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD. These documents
also may be viewed and downloaded
electronically via the rulemaking Web
site at https://ruleforum.llnl.gov. Address
questions about our rulemaking Web
site to Carol Gallagher; (301) 415–5905;
e-mail cag@nrc.gov.
The NRC maintains an Agencywide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
documents. These documents may be
accessed through the NRC’s Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. If you do not have access
to ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff
at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
C. Comfort, Jr., Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
(301) 415–8106, e-mail gcc1@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On January 21, 2000 (65 FR 3394), the
NRC published a notice of receipt of a
petition for rulemaking filed by Donald
A. Barbour, Philotechnics. The
petitioner requested that the NRC
amend its regulations to provide
additional rules for the effective control
of depleted uranium aircraft
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12ja05.014
*
2053
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2034-2053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1205
[Doc. No. CN-04-001]
Cotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental
Assessment on Imports (2004 Amendments)
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to amend
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations by adjusting the total rate of
assessment per kilogram for imported cotton collected for use by the
Cotton Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of
assessment would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale
equivalent assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting
the sum to account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in
imported textile products. The proposed adjustment would reduce the
assessable portion of the cotton content of imported textile products
by the estimated average amount of U.S. cotton contained therein.
Exemptions and refunds would continue to be provided for importers
wishing to document the U.S. cotton content of specific goods. The
proposed rule would continue to ensure that the total assessment
collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of imported
products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced cotton,
and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not subject to
more than one assessment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule to Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy
Administrator, Cotton Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA,
1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 0224 Washington, DC 20250-0224.
Comments should be submitted in triplicate. Comments may also be
submitted electronically to: http:www.cottoncomments@usda.gov">//www.cottoncomments@usda.gov or
https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. All comments received will be made available for public
inspection at Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, Room 2641-S, 1400 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250 during regular business hours. A copy
of this notice may be found at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/
rulemaking.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitney Rick, Assistant to the Deputy
Administrator, Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Stop 0224, Washington, DC 20250-0224, telephone (202) 720-2259,
facsimile (202) 690-1718, or e-mail at whitney.rick@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This proposed rule would not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Cotton Research and Promotion Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court.
Under Section 12 of the Act, any person subject to an order may file
with the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provision of
the plan, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not
in accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order or to
be exempted therefrom. Such person is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on
the petition. The Act provides that the District Court of the United
States in any district in which the person is an inhabitant, or has his
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's
ruling, provided a complaint is filed within 20 days from the date of
the entry of ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) AMS has considered the economic impact
of this action on small entities and has determined that its
implementation will not have a
[[Page 2035]]
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
businesses.
There are an estimated 10,000 importers who are presently subject
to rules and regulations issued pursuant to the Cotton Research and
Promotion Order. The majority of these importers are small businesses
under the criteria established by the Small Business Administration.
The proposed rule would reduce the total rate of assessment per
kilogram for imported cotton products collected for use by the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program. The proposed total rate of assessment
would be calculated by adding together the $1 per bale equivalent
assessment and the supplemental assessment, and adjusting the sum to
account for the estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in imported
textile products. The proposed adjustment to the sum would reduce the
assessable portion of the cotton content of imported products by 22.2
percent, the current average estimated by AMS of U.S. cotton contained
therein. The proposed total rate of assessment per kilogram for
imported raw cotton and cotton textile products would be calculated
using the following formula:
1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms
A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 x .453597). $1 per bale
assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or $0.004409 per kg. (1/
226.8).
2. Supplemental Assessment of \5/10\ of One Percent of the Value of the
Cotton Converted to Kilograms
The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers
for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 x
2.2046). Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals
$0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 x .005).
3. Adjustment for U.S. Cotton Content of Imported Products
The adjustment for the U.S. cotton content of assessed imports is
obtained by multiplying the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above by the U.S.
cotton share of total net cotton textile imports (0.222) which equals
$0.002325 per kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. x 0.222). Subtracting this
amount from the sum of Nos. 1 and 2 above would equal the proposed
total rate of assessment for imported products of $0.008147 per
kilogram ($0.010472 per kg. - $0.002325 per kg. = $0.008147).
The current total rate of assessment on imported raw cotton and
imported cotton products is $0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule
would increase the assessment on raw cotton to $0.010472, an increase
of $0.002205. Even though the assessment would be raised for imported
raw cotton, the increase is small and will not significantly affect
small businesses. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate of
assessment for imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a
decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year. The proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
importers of cotton and cotton-containing products because importers
would be paying a small increase on imported raw cotton and a reduced
rate of total assessment on imported cotton products.
Paperwork Reduction
In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the information collection
requirements contained in the regulation to be amended have been
previously approved by OMB and were assigned control number 0581-0093.
Background
The Cotton Research and Promotion Act (Act), as amended, 7 U.S.C.
2101 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1966. Congress intended the
Act to:
[E]nable the establishment of an orderly procedure for the
development, financing through adequate assessments on all cotton
marketed in the United States and on imports of cotton, and carrying
out an effective and continuous coordinated program of research and
promotion designed to strengthen cotton's competitive position and
to maintain and expand domestic and foreign markets and uses for
United States cotton.
7 U.S.C. 2101.
The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture
to issue a Cotton Research and Promotion Order. An amended Order was
approved by producers and importers voting in a referendum held July
17-26, 1991. The amended Order was published in the Federal Register on
December 10, 1991 (56 FR 64470). A proposed rule implementing the
amended Order was published in the Federal Register on December 17,
1991 (56 FR 65450). Implementing rules were published on July 1 and 2,
1992, (57 FR 29181) and (57 FR 29431), respectively. The Order imposes
an assessment on the production and importation of cotton in order to
pay for the generic research and promotion projects authorized by the
Act. The assessment consists of two parts, an assessment of $1 per bale
of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton containing products, and a
supplemental assessment tied to the value of cotton.
The Act requires the Secretary to establish procedures to ensure
that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not subject
to more than one assessment. Under the current procedures established
in the regulations, an importer may receive an exemption from paying
the assessment or a reimbursement of the assessment paid by submitting
sufficient documentation to the Board to verify the U.S. cotton content
of the products to be imported or already imported. Because foreign
mills frequently mix U.S. cotton with other cottons when formulating
cotton yarns and fabrics, the ability of importers, except those
purchasing products from mills that use only U.S. cotton, to verify
through documentation the U.S. cotton content of the products they are
importing may be limited.
AMS believes that changes in the composition of U.S. cotton use and
the upcoming completion of the removal of all U.S. import quotas on
textile manufactures as outlined in the Agreement on Textile and
Clothing necessitates a change to its current regulatory procedures for
ensuring that U.S. (upland) cotton content of imported products is not
subject to more than one assessment. Prior to the 2001/2002 crop year,
the majority of U.S. (upland) cotton (58 percent in the 2000/2001 crop
year) was consumed domestically by U.S. mills. Starting with the 2001/
2002 crop year, a majority of U.S. cotton was exported (67 percent in
2003/2004). AMS expects this shift in the composition of U.S. cotton
use to continue into the foreseeable future and that the ending of U.S.
textile quotas will lead to an increase in the amount of U.S. cotton
returning to the United States in cotton product imports. AMS,
therefore, believes that it is appropriate at this time to make an
adjustment to the total rate of assessment to account for the amount of
U.S. cotton content of imported textile products.
The estimated amount of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable
cotton imports would be calculated by multiplying the U.S. cotton
export share of foreign mill use adjusted for location by assessable
imports. Adjusting the average amount of U.S. cotton contained in total
cotton imports for location would ensure that the U.S. cotton content
of total cotton imports would properly account for differences among
supplying countries with respect to U.S. cotton's share of their cotton
mill use and in their share of U.S. cotton product imports.
[[Page 2036]]
AMS will use regularly published statistics on U.S. exports by
destination (Weekly Export Sales Report), the world's textile usage of
cotton by country (Foreign Agricultural Service Cotton Circular) and
the raw cotton equivalent contained in imports and exports of textile
manufactures by country (Cotton & Wool Outlook) in the calculations of
the U.S. content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products. AMS
would determine the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total
assessable cotton imports as follows:
Step 1. Define six non-U.S. cotton product supply regions: (i)
North America: Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua,
Panama, (ii) South America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, (iii) Asia: China, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan,
Malaysia, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka,
Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, (iv) Europe: Belgium, France, Germany,
Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Turkey, (v) Oceania:
Australia, and (vi) Africa: Ivory Coast, Morocco, Nigeria, South
Africa. These six regions coincide with the six regions used by the
USDA's Economic Research Service in its reporting of U.S. cotton
textile imports.
Step 2. Calculate the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for
each region by dividing total U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region
by total mill consumption of raw cotton in that region. This would
represent an approximation of the percentage of U.S. cotton contained
in all cotton products imported into the United States from that
region. For the purpose of this calculation, U.S. cotton content
contained in a region's cotton products is uniformly distributed across
each product manufactured in that region.
Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data
available and determined that U.S. cotton's share of non-U.S. mill use
for each region was as follows: North America, 100.0 percent; South
America, 16.0 percent; Asia, 9.9 percent; Europe, 11.6 percent; Oceana,
0.0 percent; and Africa, 0.2 percent. These shares were obtained by
dividing U.S. exports of raw cotton to each region by total cotton mill
use in each region. The specific calculations are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.--Tabulation of U.S. Cotton Export Share of Foreign Mill Use
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raw cotton
mill use-- U.S. cotton
Region U.S. exports million 480 share of raw
of raw cotton lb. Bales-- cotton mill
use
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North America................................................... 2.842 2.767 \a\ 1.000
South America................................................... 0.833 5.207 0.160
Asia............................................................ 6.481 65.254 0.099
Europe.......................................................... 1.757 15.103 0.116
Oceana.......................................................... 0.000 0.125 0.000
Africa.......................................................... 0.006 2.876 0.002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North America share capped at 1.000.
Step 3. Determine total imports of assessable cotton for each
region by subtracting the total cotton content of U.S. exports of
processed cotton products in raw cotton equivalents to each region from
the total cotton content of U.S. imports of processed cotton products
from that region in raw cotton equivalents. The net result (net
imports) of processed cotton products provides an approximation of the
amount of cotton coming into the United States from each region that is
not being exempted or receiving a refund.
Under the proposed rule, AMS examined the most current data
available and determined that processed cotton imports into the U.S.
totaled 9,232 \1\ million pounds (North America, 3,116 million pounds;
South America, 242 million pounds, Asia, 4,770 million pounds, Europe,
684 million pounds, Oceania, 41 million pounds, and Africa, 378 million
pounds. U.S. processed cotton exports for the same time period and
regions totaled 2,317 \1\ million pounds (North America, 2,151 million
pounds; South America, 45 million pounds; Asia 64 million pounds;
Europe 45 million pounds; Oceania 5 million pounds; and Africa, 7
million pounds). Subtracting U.S. exports from U.S. imports results in
total net imports of 6,915 \1\ million pounds (North America, 965
pounds; South America, 197 million pounds; Asia, 4,706 million pounds;
Europe, 639 million pounds; Oceana, 36 million pounds; and Africa, 371
million pounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Total does not equal sum of regions due to rounding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step 4. Adjust the U.S. cotton content of imports for location by
multiplying the U.S. cotton share of foreign mill use for each region
by that region's share of total imports of assessable cotton and then
totaling-up the result obtained across all the regions. The share of
total imports of assessed cotton products is calculated by dividing the
total assessed cotton contained in each regions' imports as discussed
in Step 3 above by the sum of all regions' imports of assessed cotton.
Step 5. The percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable
imports is then used to calculate the assessable content of imported
cotton products by multiplying the cotton content of each imported
product by the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in total assessable
imports and subtracting that amount from the cotton content of imported
products (assessable cotton content = cotton content per HTS code -
(cotton content per HTS code x proportion of U.S. cotton contained in
U.S. imports) where the proportion of U.S. cotton contained in U.S.
imports equals the percentage of U.S. cotton contained in assessable
imports divided by 100).
Using the above method and the most current data available to AMS,
the proposed rule would lower the total amount of assessments paid by
importers for imported textile products by approximately 22.2 percent
from the total amount of assessments paid by importers using current
procedures. Raw cotton import assessments would increase by 26.7
percent based on the established formula. Exemptions and
[[Page 2037]]
refunds would continue to be provided for importers wishing to document
the U.S. cotton content of specific goods.
The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale equivalent of cotton
containing products, and the supplemental assessment would continue to
be calculated the same way. The $1 per bale of cotton or per bale
equivalent of cotton containing products assessment is levied on the
weight of cotton produced or imported at a rate of $1 per bale of
cotton which is equivalent to 500 pounds or $1 per 226.8 kilograms of
cotton.
The supplemental assessment is levied at a rate of five-tenths of
one percent of the value of domestically produced cotton, imported
cotton, and the cotton content of imported products. AMS assigns the
calendar year weighted average price received by U.S. farmers for
Upland cotton to represent the value of imported cotton. The current
value of imported cotton as published in the Federal Register (68 FR
27898) on May 22, 2003, for the purpose of calculating supplemental
assessments on imported cotton is $0.7716 per kilogram. This number was
calculated using the annual weighted average price received by farmers
for Upland cotton during the calendar year 2002 which was $0.35 per
pound and multiplying by the conversion factor 2.2046. Using the
Average Weighted Price Received by U.S. farmers for Upland cotton for
the calendar year 2003, which is $0.55 per pound, the new value of
imported cotton is $1.2125 per kilogram. The proposed value is $.4409
per kilogram more than the previous value.
The U.S. cotton share of total net imported products is
approximated at 0.222. This figure was obtained by multiplying U.S.
cotton's share of each region's mill use by that region's share of
assessable cotton imports. The U.S. content of assessable cotton
imports for each supply region is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.--Tabulation of U.S. Cotton Share of Total Assessable U.S. Cotton Imports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. cotton
U.S. share of Region share share of
Region foreign mill of assessable assessable
use cotton imports imports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North America................................................... 1.000 0.140 0.140
South America................................................... 0.160 0.028 0.004
Asia............................................................ 0.099 0.681 0.067
Europe.......................................................... 0.116 0.092 0.011
Oceana.......................................................... 0.000 0.005 0.000
Africa.......................................................... 0.002 0.054 0.000
-----------------
Total....................................................... N.A. 1.000 0.222
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An example of the complete assessment formula and how the various
figures are obtained is as follows:
One bale is equal to 500 pounds.
One kilogram equals 2.2046 pounds.
One pound equals 0.453597 kilograms.
1. One Dollar per Bale Assessment Converted to Kilograms
A 500 pound bale equals 226.8 kg. (500 x .453597).
$1 per bale assessment equals $0.002000 per pound (1/500) or
$0.004409 per kg. (1/226.8).
2. Supplemental Assessment of \5/10\ of One Percent of the Value of the
Cotton Converted to Kilograms
The 2003 calendar year weighted average price received by producers
for Upland cotton is $0.55 per pound or $1.2125 per kg. (0.55 x
2.2046).
Five tenths of one percent of the average price in kg. equals
$0.006063 per kg. (1.2125 x .005).
3. Total Rate of Assessment
The total rate of assessment per kilogram of raw cotton is
$0.010472 per kg. (obtained by adding the $1 per bale equivalent
assessment of $0.004409 per kg., and the supplemental assessment
$0.006063 per kg.), and making an adjustment of 0.222 for the U.S.
cotton content of assessed imported textile products. The proposed
total rate of assessment for imported cotton would be $0.008147 per
kilogram. The current total rate of assessment on imported cotton is
$0.008267 per kilogram. The proposed rule would decrease the total rate
of assessment on imported cotton products to $0.008147 per kilogram, a
decrease of $0.00012 per kilogram from last year.
The figures shown in the right hand column of the Import Assessment
Table 1205.510(b)(3) are a result of such a calculation, and have been
revised accordingly. These figures indicate the total assessment per
kilogram due for each Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) number subject
to assessment.
A sixty-day comment period is provided to comment on the changes to
the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations proposed herein. This period is
deemed appropriate because this proposal would adjust the assessments
paid by importers on imported raw cotton and cotton products under the
Cotton Research and Promotion Order, by increasing the assessment on
raw cotton and reducing the total rate of assessment for imported
cotton products. These proposed changes would ensure that the total
assessment collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of
imported products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced
cotton, and that the U.S. cotton content of imported products is not
subject to more than one assessment.
Accordingly, the change proposed in this rule, if adopted, should
be implemented as soon as possible.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1205
Advertising, Agricultural research, Cotton, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble 7 CFR part 1205 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1205--COTTON RESEARCH AND PROMOTION
1. The authority citation for part 1205 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101-2118.
2. In Sec. 1205.510, paragraph (b)(2) and the table in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1205.510 Levy of assessments.
* * * * *
(b) * * * (2) The 12-month average of monthly weighted average
prices received by U.S. farmers will be calculated annually. Such
weighted average will be used as the value of imported cotton for the
purpose of levying the supplemental assessment on
[[Page 2038]]
imported cotton and will be expressed in kilograms. The value of
imported cotton for the purpose of levying the supplemental assessment
is $1.2125 per kilogram. The total rate of assessment for imported raw
cotton is $0.010472, and the total rate of assessment for imported
cotton products is $0.008147 per kilogram.
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
[[Page 2039]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.000
[[Page 2040]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.001
[[Page 2041]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.002
[[Page 2042]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.003
[[Page 2043]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.004
[[Page 2044]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.005
[[Page 2045]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.006
[[Page 2046]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.007
[[Page 2047]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.008
[[Page 2048]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.009
[[Page 2049]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.010
[[Page 2050]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.011
[[Page 2051]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.012
[[Page 2052]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.013
[[Page 2053]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA05.014
* * * * *
Dated: January 5, 2005.
A.J. Yates,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-475 Filed 1-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-C