Civil Penalty Assessment Procedures; Correction, 1812-1815 [05-528]
Download as PDF
1812
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
data using the above analytical methods
need not be brand-name specific.
(b) Performance test information. In
assessing performance of qualifying
biobased products, USDA requires that
Federal agencies rely on results of
performance tests using applicable
ASTM, ISO, Federal or military
specifications, or other similarly
authoritative industry test standards.
Such testing must be conducted by an
ASTM/ISO compliant laboratory. The
procuring official will decide whether
performance data must be brand-name
specific in the case of products that are
essentially of the same formulation.
§ 2902.9
Funding for testing.
(a) USDA use of funds for biobased
content and BEES testing. USDA will
use funds to support testing for biobased
content and conduct of BEES testing for
products within items USDA has
selected to designate for preferred
procurement through early regulatory
action. USDA initially will focus on
gathering the necessary test information
on a sufficient number of products
within an item (generic grouping of
products) to support regulations to be
promulgated to designate an item or
items for preferred procurement under
this program. USDA may accept cost
sharing for such testing to the extent
consistent with USDA product testing
decisions. During this period USDA will
not consider cost sharing in deciding
what products to test. When USDA has
concluded that a critical mass of items
have been designated, USDA will
exercise its discretion, in accordance
with the competitive procedures
outlined in paragraph (b) of this section,
to allocate a portion of the available
USDA testing funds to give priority to
testing of products for which private
sector firms provide cost sharing for the
testing.
(b) Competitive program for cost
sharing for determining life cycle costs,
environmental and health benefits, and
performance. (1) Subject to the
availability of funds and paragraph (a)
of this section, USDA will announce
annually the solicitation of proposals for
cost sharing for life cycle costs,
environmental and health benefits, and
performance testing of biobased
products in accordance with the
standards set forth in § 2902.8 to carry
out this program. Information regarding
the submission of proposals for cost
sharing also will be posted on the USDA
informational Web site, https://
www.biobased.oce.usda.gov.
(2) Proposals will be evaluated and
assigned a priority rating. Priority
ratings will be based on the following
criteria:
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
(i) A maximum of 25 points will be
awarded a proposal based on the market
readiness;
(ii) A maximum of 20 points will be
awarded a proposal based on the
potential size of the market for that
product in Federal agencies;
(iii) A maximum of 25 points will be
awarded based on the financial need for
assistance of the manufacturer or
vendor;
(iv) A maximum of 20 points will be
awarded a proposal based on the
product’s prospective competitiveness
in the market place;
(v) A maximum of 10 points will be
awarded a proposal based on its likely
benefit to the environment.
(3) Cost-sharing proposals will be
considered first for high priority
products of small and emerging private
business enterprises. If funds remain to
support further testing, USDA will
consider cost sharing proposals for
products of all other producers of
biobased items as well as the remaining
proposals for products of small and
emerging private business enterprises.
Proposals will be selected based on
priority rating until available funds for
the fiscal year are committed.
(4)(i) For products selected for life
cycle costs and environmental and
health benefits testing under this
paragraph, USDA could provide up to
50 percent of the cost of determining the
life cycle costs and environmental and
health effects, up to a maximum of
$5,000 of assistance per product.
(ii) For products selected for
performance testing under this
paragraph, USDA could provide up to
50 percent of the cost for performance
testing, up to $100,000 of assistance per
product for up to two performance tests
(measures of performance) per product.
(5) For selected proposals, USDA will
enter into agreements with and provide
the funds directly to the testing entities.
(6) Proposals submitted in one fiscal
year, but not selected for cost sharing of
testing in that year, may be resubmitted
to be considered for cost sharing in the
following year.
Subpart B—Designated Items
[Reserved]
Dated: January 3, 2005.
Keith Collins,
Chief Economist, Department of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 05–399 Filed 1–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–GL–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 13
[Docket No. 27854; Amendment No. 13–32]
RIN 2120–AE84
Civil Penalty Assessment Procedures;
Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction and
technical amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action makes minor
editorial corrections to the final rule
published in the Federal Register on
October 4, 2004 (69 FR 59490) and
technical corrections to one of the
regulations it amended. That final rule
adopted changed procedures concerning
initiating and adjudicating an
administratively assessed civil penalty
against an individual acting as a pilot,
flight engineer, mechanic, or repairman.
Corrections include a quote and
reference in the preamble, the removal
of a redundant paragraph in the rule
language, and several cross references
to, and a typographical error in,
redesignated paragraphs.
DATES: Effective January 11, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Redos, Attorney, telephone (202)
267–3137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final
rule, published on October 4, 2004 (69
FR 59490), codified in Part 13
procedures relating to FAA civil penalty
actions against a pilot, flight engineer,
mechanic, or repairman, which are
subject to review by the National
Transportation Safety Board under 49
U.S.C. 46301(d)(5). The rule also made
other minor modifications to the FAA’s
procedures for assessing civil penalties
against persons other than pilots, flight
engineers, mechanics or repairmen.
This publication corrects a quote and
a reference in the preamble and removes
a redundant section in 14 CFR 13.14. In
§ 13.14, paragraphs (a) and (b) are
substantively identical, only set out
differently. Paragraph (a) is, therefore,
removed, and the paragraphs
renumbered.
This publication also corrects several
cross references to, and one
typographical error in, redesignated
paragraphs in § 13.16. The entire text of
§ 13.16 is republished for clarity. The
first sentence in paragraph (d) is
changed to add a cross reference to
paragraph (c). In paragraph (d)(2), the
cross reference to paragraph (e)(2)(ii) is
changed to paragraph (g)(2)(ii). In
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) District court jurisdiction.
Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph (a) of this section, the United
States district courts have exclusive
jurisdiction of any civil penalty action
initiated by the FAA for violations
described in those paragraphs, under 49
U.S.C. 46301(d)(4), if—
(1) The amount in controversy is more
than $50,000 for a violation committed
by any person before December 12,
2003;
(2) The amount in controversy is more
than $400,000 for a violation committed
Corrections to Preamble
by a person other than an individual or
I In final rule Federal Register Doc. 04–
small business concern on or after
22276, published on October 4, 2004 (69 December 12, 2003;
FR 58490), make the following
(3) The amount in controversy is more
corrections.
than $50,000 for a violation committed
I 1. On page 59492, in the second
by an individual or a small business
column, in the first sentence under
concern on or after December 12, 2003;
Compromise Order remove the words
(4) The action is in rem or another
‘‘Section 46301(i)(1)’’ and correct to read action in rem based on the same
‘‘Section 46301(f)(1)’’.
violation has been brought;
I 2. On page 59493, in the third column,
(5) The action involves an aircraft
in the second line from the top, remove
subject to a lien that has been seized by
the word ‘‘with’’ and correct to read
the Government; or
‘‘within’’.
(6) Another action has been brought
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 13
for an injunction based on the same
violation.
Administrative practice and
(c) Hazardous materials violations.
procedure, Air transportation,
The FAA may assess a civil penalty
Investigations, Law enforcement,
against any person who knowingly
Penalties.
commits an act in violation of 49 U.S.C.
The Amendment
chapter 51 or a regulation prescribed or
order issued under that chapter, under
I The Federal Aviation Administration
49 U.S.C. 5123 and 49 CFR 1.47(k). An
corrects Part 13 of Title 14 of the Code
of Federal Regulations to read as follows: order assessing a civil penalty for a
violation under 49 U.S.C. chapter 51, or
PART 13—INVESTIGATIVE AND
a rule, regulation, or order issued
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
thereunder, is issued only after the
following factors have been considered:
I 1. The authority citation for part 13
(1) The nature, circumstances, extent,
continues to read as follows:
and gravity of the violation;
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 6002; 28 U.S.C. 2461
(2) With respect to the violator, the
(note); 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 5121–5124, 40113–
degree of culpability, any history of
40114, 44103–44106, 44702–44703, 44709–
prior violations, the ability to pay, and
44710, 44713, 46101–46110, 46301–46316,
any effect on the ability to continue to
46318, 46501–46502, 46504–46507, 47106,
do business; and
47111, 47122, 47306, 47531–47532; 49 CFR
(3) Such other matters as justice may
1.47
require.
§ 13.14 [Corrected]
(d) Order assessing civil penalty. An
I 2. In § 13.14, remove paragraph (a) and
order assessing civil penalty may be
redesignate paragraphs (b) through (d) as issued for a violation described in
paragraphs (a) through (c).
paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section, or
I 3. § 13.16 is revised to read as follows:
as otherwise provided by statute, after
notice and opportunity for a hearing. A
§ 13.16 Civil Penalties: Administrative
person charged with a violation may be
assessment against a person other than an
subject to an order assessing civil
individual acting as a pilot, flight engineer,
penalty in the following circumstances:
mechanic, or repairman. Administrative
assessment against all persons for
(1) An order assessing civil penalty
hazardous materials violations.
may be issued if a person charged with
a violation submits or agrees to submit
(a) The FAA uses these procedures
a civil penalty for a violation.
when it assesses a civil penalty against
(2) An order assessing civil penalty
a person other than an individual acting
may be issued if a person charged with
as a pilot, flight engineer, mechanic, or
a violation does not request a hearing
repairman for a violation cited in 40
under paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section
U.S.C. 46301(d)(2) or 47531.
paragraphs (g) and (g)(1)(ii), the cross
references to paragraph (d)(2) are
changed to paragraph (f)(2). In
paragraph (h), the cross references to
paragraph (d)(3) and paragraph (e)(2)(ii)
are changed to paragraph (f)(3) and
paragraph (g)(2)(ii), respectively. In
paragraph (i), the cross references to
paragraph (d)(3) and paragraph (e)(2)(ii)
are also changed to paragraph (f)(3) and
paragraph (g)(2)(ii), respectively. In the
second sentence of program (m)(1), the
word ‘‘nor’’ is changed to ‘‘or’’
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1813
within 15 days after receipt of a final
notice of proposed civil penalty.
(3) Unless an appeal is filed with the
FAA decisionmaker in a timely manner,
an initial decision or order of an
administrative law judge shall be
considered an order assessing civil
penalty if an administrative law judge
finds that an alleged violation occurred
and determines that a civil penalty, in
an amount found appropriate by the
administrative law judge, is warranted.
(4) Unless a petition for review is filed
with a U.S. Court of Appeals in a timely
manner, a final decision and order of
the Administrator shall be considered
an order assessing civil penalty if the
FAA decisionmaker finds that an
alleged violation occurred and a civil
penalty is warranted.
(3) Delegation of authority. (1) The
authority of the Administrator under 49
U.S.C. 46301(d), 47531, and 5123, and
49 CFR 1.47(k) to initiate and assess
civil penalties for a violation of those
statutes or a rule, regulation, or order
issued thereunder, is delegated to the
Deputy Chief Counsel for Operations;
the Assistant Chief Counsel for
Enforcement; the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Europe, Africa, and Middle
East Area Office; the Regional Counsel;
the Aeronautical Center Counsel; and
the Technical Center Counsel.
(2) The authority of the Administrator
under 49 U.S.C. 5123, 49 CFR 1.47(k),
49 U.S.C. 46301(d), and 49 U.S.C. 46305
to refer cases to the Attorney General of
the United States, or the delegate of the
Attorney General, for collection of civil
penalties is delegated to the Deputy
Chief Counsel for Operations; the
Assistant Chief Counsel for
Enforcement; Assistant Chief Counsel,
Europe, Africa, and Middle East Area
Office; the Regional Counsel; the
Aeronautical Center Counsel; and the
Technical Center Counsel.
(3) The authority of the Administrator
under 49 U.S.C. 46301(f) to compromise
the amount of a civil penalty imposed
is delegated to the Deputy Chief Counsel
for Operations; the Assistant Chief
Counsel for Enforcement; Assistant
Chief Counsel, Europe, Africa, and
Middle East Area Office; the Regional
Counsel; the Aeronautical Center
Counsel; and the Technical Center
Counsel.
(4) The authority of the Administrator
under 49 U.S.C. 5123 (e) and (f) and 49
CFR 1.47(k) to compromise the amount
of a civil penalty imposed is delegated
to the Deputy Chief Counsel for
Operations; the Assistant Chief Counsel
for Enforcement; Assistant Chief
Counsel, Europe, Africa, and Middle
East Area Office; the Regional Counsel;
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1814
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the Aeronautical Center Counsel; and
the Technical Center Counsel.
(f) Notice of proposed civil penalty. A
civil penalty action is initiated by
sending a notice of proposed civil
penalty to the person charged with a
violation or to the agent for services for
the person under 49 U.S.C. 46103. A
notice of proposed civil penalty will be
sent to the individual charged with a
violation or to the president of the
corporation or company charged with a
violation. In response to a notice of
proposed civil penalty, a corporation or
company may designate in writing
another person to receive documents in
that civil penalty action. The notice of
proposed civil penalty contains a
statement of the charges and the amount
of the proposed civil penalty. Not later
than 30 days after receipt of the notice
of proposed civil penalty, the person
charged with a violation shall—
(1) Submit the amount of the
proposed civil penalty or an agreedupon amount, in which case either an
order assessing civil penalty or
compromise order shall be issued in
that amount;
(2) Submit to the agency attorney one
of the following:
(i) Written information, including
documents and witness statements,
demonstrating that a violation of the
regulations did not occur or that a
penalty or the amount of the penalty is
not warranted by the circumstances.
(ii) A written request to reduce the
proposed civil penalty, the amount of
reduction, and the reasons and any
documents supporting a reduction of
the proposed civil penalty, including
records indicating a financial inability
to pay or records showing that payment
of the proposed civil penalty would
prevent the person from continuing in
business.
(iii) A written request for an informal
conference to discuss the matter with
the agency attorney and to submit
relevant information or documents; or
(3) Request a hearing, in which case
a complaint shall be filed with the
hearing docket clerk.
(g) Final notice of proposed civil
penalty. A final notice of proposed civil
penalty may be issued after
participation in informal procedures
provided in paragraph(f)(2) of this
section or failure to respond in a timely
manner to a notice of proposed civil
penalty. A final notice of proposed civil
penalty will be sent to the individual
charged with a violation, to the
president of the corporation or company
charged with a violation, or a person
previously designated in writing by the
individual, corporation, or company to
receive documents in that civil penalty
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
action. If not previously done in
response to a notice of proposed civil
penalty, a corporation or company may
designate in writing another person to
receive documents in that civil penalty
action. The final notice of proposed
civil penalty contains a statement of the
charges and the amount of the proposed
civil penalty and, as a result of
information submitted to the agency
attorney during informal procedures,
may modify an allegation or a proposed
civil penalty contained in a notice of
proposed civil penalty.
(1) A final notice of proposed civil
penalty may be issued—
(i) If the person charged with a
violation fails to respond to the notice
of proposed civil penalty within 30 days
after receipt of that notice; or
(ii) If the parties participated in any
informal procedures under paragraph
(f)(2) of this section and the parties have
not agreed to compromise the action or
the agency attorney has not agreed to
withdraw the notice of proposed civil
penalty.
(2) Not later than 15 days after receipt
of the final notice of proposed civil
penalty, the person charged with a
violation shall do one of the following—
(i) Submit the amount of the proposed
civil penalty or an agreed-upon amount,
in which case either an order assessing
civil penalty or a compromise order
shall be issued in that amount; or
(ii) Request a hearing, in which case
a complaint shall be filed with the
hearing docket clerk.
(h) Request for a hearing. Any person
charged with a violation may request a
hearing, pursuant to paragraph (f)(3) or
paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section, to be
conducted in accordance with the
procedures in subpart G of this part. A
person requesting a hearing shall file a
written request for a hearing with the
hearing docket clerk (Hearing Docket,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800,
Independence Avenue, SW., Room
924A, Washington, DC 20591,
Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk) and
shall mail a copy of the request to the
agency attorney. The request for a
hearing may be in the form of a letter
but must be dated and signed by the
person requesting a hearing. The request
for a hearing may be typewritten or may
be legibly handwritten.
(i) Hearing. If the person charged with
a violation requests a hearing pursuant
to paragraph (f)(3) or paragraph (g)(2)(ii)
of this section, the original complaint
shall be filed with the hearing docket
clerk and a copy shall be sent to the
person requesting the hearing. The
procedural rules in subpart G of this
part apply to the hearing and any
appeal. At the close of the hearing, the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
administrative law judge shall issue,
either orally on the record or in writing,
an initial decision, including the
reasons for the decision, that contains
findings or conclusions on the
allegations contained, and the civil
penalty sought, in the complaint.
(j) Appeal. Either party may appeal
the administrative law judge’s initial
decision to the FAA decisionmaker
pursuant to the procedures in subpart G
of this part. If a party files a notice of
appeal pursuant to § 13.233 of subpart
G, the effectiveness of the initial
decision is stayed until a final decision
and order of the Administrator have
been entered on the record. The FAA
decisionmaker shall review the record
and issue a final decision and order of
the Administrator that affirm, modify, or
reverse the initial decision. The FAA
decisionmaker may assess a civil
penalty but shall not assess a civil
penalty in an amount greater than that
sought in the complaint.
(k) Payment. A person shall pay a
civil penalty by sending a certified
check or money order, payable to the
Federal Aviation Administration, to the
agency attorney.
(l) Collection of civil penalties. If an
individual does not pay a civil penalty
imposed by an order assessing civil
penalty or other final order, the
Administrator may take action provided
under the law to collect the penalty.
(m) Exhaustion of administrative
remedies and judicial review. (1) Cases
under the FAA statute. A party may
petition for review only of a final
decision and order of the FAA
decisionmaker to the courts of appeals
of the United States for the circuit in
which the individual charged resides or
has his or her principal place of
business or the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit, under 49 U.S.C. 46110,
46301(d)(6), and 46301(g). Neither an
initial decision or order issues by an
administrative law judge that has not
been appealed to the FAA
decisionmaker, nor an order
compromising a civil penalty action,
may be appealed under those sections.
(2) Cases under the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law. A party
may seek judicial review only of a final
decision and order of the FAA
decisionmaker involving a violation of
the Federal hazardous materials
transportation law or a regulation or
order issued thereunder to an
appropriate district court of the United
States, under 5 U.S.C. 703 and 704 and
28 U.S.C. 1331. Neither an initial
decision or order issued by an
administrative law judge that has not
been appealed to the FAA
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
decisionmaker, nor an order
compromising a civil penalty action,
may be appealed under these sections.
(n) Compromise. The FAA may
compromise the amount of any civil
penalty imposed under this section,
under 49 U.S.C. 5123(e), 46031(f),
46303(b), or 46318 at any time before
referring the action to the United States
Attorney General, or the delegate of the
Attorney General, for collection.
(1) An agency attorney may
compromise any civil penalty action
where a person charged with a violation
agrees to pay a civil penalty and the
FAA agrees not to make a finding of
violation. Under such agreement, a
compromise order is issued following
the payment of the agreed-on amount or
the signing of a promissory note. The
compromise order states the following:
(i) The person has paid a civil penalty
or has signed a promissory note
providing for installment payments.
(ii) The FAA makes no finding of a
violation.
(iii) The compromise order shall not
be used as evidence of a prior violation
in any subsequent civil penalty
proceeding or certificate action
proceeding.
(2) An agency attorney may
compromise the amount of an civil
penalty proposed in a notice, assessed
in an order, or imposed in a
compromise order.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
23, 2004.
Rebecca MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 05–528 Filed 1–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002–NE–33–AD; Amendment
39–13939; AD 2005–01–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F Series Reciprocating Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F,
912 S, and 914 F series reciprocating
engines. That AD currently requires
venting of the lubrication system and
inspection of the valve train on all
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
engines. That AD also requires venting
of the lubrication system of all engines
on which the lubrication system has
been opened, and any engine on which
the propeller has been rotated one full
turn in the wrong direction. This AD
requires similar actions, and also
requires removing the existing part
number oil dipstick from service and
installing a new oil dipstick. This AD
results from the need to clarify the
mandated procedures for inspections
and venting. This AD also results from
the manufacturer discovering that under
certain circumstances, the oil level in
the oil tank can fall below the minimum
level required to sustain proper engine
lubrication. We are issuing this AD to
prevent damage to the engine valve train
due to inadequate venting of the
lubrication system, which can result in
an in-flight engine failure and forced
landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
February 15, 2005. The Director of the
Federal Register previously approved
the incorporation by reference of certain
publications as listed in the regulations
as of October 28, 2002 (67 FR 65033,
October 23, 2002).
ADDRESSES: You can get the service
information identified in this AD from
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH, Gunskirchen,
Austria; telephone 7246–601–423; fax
7246–601–760.
You may examine the AD docket at
the FAA, New England Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA. You
may examine the service information, at
the FAA, New England Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park; telephone (781)
238–7136; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with
a proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
to supersede AD 2002–21–16. The
proposed AD applies to BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914
F series reciprocating engines. We
published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on August 12, 2004 (69
FR 49829). That action proposed to do
the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1815
• At the next oil change, or within
100 hours TIS after the effective date of
the AD, whichever is later, remove the
oil dipstick, part number (P/N) 956150,
from service, and install a serviceable
dipstick that has a different P/N.
• Before the next engine start for
engines with 50 hours or less time-inservice (TIS) on the effective date of the
AD, since the engine had the oil system
opened, or the oil was changed using
other than specified procedures, or the
propeller was rotated more than one
turn in the wrong direction of rotation,
inspect for valve train damage, proper
venting of the lubrication system and
inspect for the correct venting of the
hydraulic valve tappets.
• Thereafter, for all engines, properly
vent the lubrication system before
starting the engine, after any of the
following:
• Initial installation of a new or
overhauled engine;
• Opening the oil system;
• Changing the oil using improper
procedures;
• The propeller was rotated more
than one turn in the wrong direction of
rotation, allowing air to be ingested into
the valve train components.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket
(including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between
8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. See
ADDRESSES for the location.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We received no
comments on the proposal or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 624 BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914
F series reciprocating engines of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
We estimate that 282 engines installed
on aircraft of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD. We also estimate
that it will take about one work hour per
engine to perform one oil system
inspection and venting, and that the
average labor rate is $65 per work hour.
Required parts will cost about $0.85 per
engine. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S.
operators to be $18,570.
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1812-1815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-528]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 13
[Docket No. 27854; Amendment No. 13-32]
RIN 2120-AE84
Civil Penalty Assessment Procedures; Correction
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction and technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action makes minor editorial corrections to the final
rule published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2004 (69 FR 59490)
and technical corrections to one of the regulations it amended. That
final rule adopted changed procedures concerning initiating and
adjudicating an administratively assessed civil penalty against an
individual acting as a pilot, flight engineer, mechanic, or repairman.
Corrections include a quote and reference in the preamble, the removal
of a redundant paragraph in the rule language, and several cross
references to, and a typographical error in, redesignated paragraphs.
DATES: Effective January 11, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Redos, Attorney, telephone (202)
267-3137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final rule, published on October 4, 2004
(69 FR 59490), codified in Part 13 procedures relating to FAA civil
penalty actions against a pilot, flight engineer, mechanic, or
repairman, which are subject to review by the National Transportation
Safety Board under 49 U.S.C. 46301(d)(5). The rule also made other
minor modifications to the FAA's procedures for assessing civil
penalties against persons other than pilots, flight engineers,
mechanics or repairmen.
This publication corrects a quote and a reference in the preamble
and removes a redundant section in 14 CFR 13.14. In Sec. 13.14,
paragraphs (a) and (b) are substantively identical, only set out
differently. Paragraph (a) is, therefore, removed, and the paragraphs
renumbered.
This publication also corrects several cross references to, and one
typographical error in, redesignated paragraphs in Sec. 13.16. The
entire text of Sec. 13.16 is republished for clarity. The first
sentence in paragraph (d) is changed to add a cross reference to
paragraph (c). In paragraph (d)(2), the cross reference to paragraph
(e)(2)(ii) is changed to paragraph (g)(2)(ii). In
[[Page 1813]]
paragraphs (g) and (g)(1)(ii), the cross references to paragraph (d)(2)
are changed to paragraph (f)(2). In paragraph (h), the cross references
to paragraph (d)(3) and paragraph (e)(2)(ii) are changed to paragraph
(f)(3) and paragraph (g)(2)(ii), respectively. In paragraph (i), the
cross references to paragraph (d)(3) and paragraph (e)(2)(ii) are also
changed to paragraph (f)(3) and paragraph (g)(2)(ii), respectively. In
the second sentence of program (m)(1), the word ``nor'' is changed to
``or''
Corrections to Preamble
0
In final rule Federal Register Doc. 04-22276, published on October 4,
2004 (69 FR 58490), make the following corrections.
0
1. On page 59492, in the second column, in the first sentence under
Compromise Order remove the words ``Section 46301(i)(1)'' and correct
to read ``Section 46301(f)(1)''.
0
2. On page 59493, in the third column, in the second line from the top,
remove the word ``with'' and correct to read ``within''.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 13
Administrative practice and procedure, Air transportation,
Investigations, Law enforcement, Penalties.
The Amendment
0
The Federal Aviation Administration corrects Part 13 of Title 14 of the
Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows:
PART 13--INVESTIGATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 13 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 6002; 28 U.S.C. 2461 (note); 49 U.S.C.
106(g), 5121-5124, 40113-40114, 44103-44106, 44702-44703, 44709-
44710, 44713, 46101-46110, 46301-46316, 46318, 46501-46502, 46504-
46507, 47106, 47111, 47122, 47306, 47531-47532; 49 CFR 1.47
Sec. 13.14 [Corrected]
0
2. In Sec. 13.14, remove paragraph (a) and redesignate paragraphs (b)
through (d) as paragraphs (a) through (c).
0
3. Sec. 13.16 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 13.16 Civil Penalties: Administrative assessment against a
person other than an individual acting as a pilot, flight engineer,
mechanic, or repairman. Administrative assessment against all persons
for hazardous materials violations.
(a) The FAA uses these procedures when it assesses a civil penalty
against a person other than an individual acting as a pilot, flight
engineer, mechanic, or repairman for a violation cited in 40 U.S.C.
46301(d)(2) or 47531.
(b) District court jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph (a) of this section, the United States district courts have
exclusive jurisdiction of any civil penalty action initiated by the FAA
for violations described in those paragraphs, under 49 U.S.C.
46301(d)(4), if--
(1) The amount in controversy is more than $50,000 for a violation
committed by any person before December 12, 2003;
(2) The amount in controversy is more than $400,000 for a violation
committed by a person other than an individual or small business
concern on or after December 12, 2003;
(3) The amount in controversy is more than $50,000 for a violation
committed by an individual or a small business concern on or after
December 12, 2003;
(4) The action is in rem or another action in rem based on the same
violation has been brought;
(5) The action involves an aircraft subject to a lien that has been
seized by the Government; or
(6) Another action has been brought for an injunction based on the
same violation.
(c) Hazardous materials violations. The FAA may assess a civil
penalty against any person who knowingly commits an act in violation of
49 U.S.C. chapter 51 or a regulation prescribed or order issued under
that chapter, under 49 U.S.C. 5123 and 49 CFR 1.47(k). An order
assessing a civil penalty for a violation under 49 U.S.C. chapter 51,
or a rule, regulation, or order issued thereunder, is issued only after
the following factors have been considered:
(1) The nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the
violation;
(2) With respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any
history of prior violations, the ability to pay, and any effect on the
ability to continue to do business; and
(3) Such other matters as justice may require.
(d) Order assessing civil penalty. An order assessing civil penalty
may be issued for a violation described in paragraphs (a) or (c) of
this section, or as otherwise provided by statute, after notice and
opportunity for a hearing. A person charged with a violation may be
subject to an order assessing civil penalty in the following
circumstances:
(1) An order assessing civil penalty may be issued if a person
charged with a violation submits or agrees to submit a civil penalty
for a violation.
(2) An order assessing civil penalty may be issued if a person
charged with a violation does not request a hearing under paragraph
(g)(2)(ii) of this section within 15 days after receipt of a final
notice of proposed civil penalty.
(3) Unless an appeal is filed with the FAA decisionmaker in a
timely manner, an initial decision or order of an administrative law
judge shall be considered an order assessing civil penalty if an
administrative law judge finds that an alleged violation occurred and
determines that a civil penalty, in an amount found appropriate by the
administrative law judge, is warranted.
(4) Unless a petition for review is filed with a U.S. Court of
Appeals in a timely manner, a final decision and order of the
Administrator shall be considered an order assessing civil penalty if
the FAA decisionmaker finds that an alleged violation occurred and a
civil penalty is warranted.
(3) Delegation of authority. (1) The authority of the Administrator
under 49 U.S.C. 46301(d), 47531, and 5123, and 49 CFR 1.47(k) to
initiate and assess civil penalties for a violation of those statutes
or a rule, regulation, or order issued thereunder, is delegated to the
Deputy Chief Counsel for Operations; the Assistant Chief Counsel for
Enforcement; the Assistant Chief Counsel, Europe, Africa, and Middle
East Area Office; the Regional Counsel; the Aeronautical Center
Counsel; and the Technical Center Counsel.
(2) The authority of the Administrator under 49 U.S.C. 5123, 49 CFR
1.47(k), 49 U.S.C. 46301(d), and 49 U.S.C. 46305 to refer cases to the
Attorney General of the United States, or the delegate of the Attorney
General, for collection of civil penalties is delegated to the Deputy
Chief Counsel for Operations; the Assistant Chief Counsel for
Enforcement; Assistant Chief Counsel, Europe, Africa, and Middle East
Area Office; the Regional Counsel; the Aeronautical Center Counsel; and
the Technical Center Counsel.
(3) The authority of the Administrator under 49 U.S.C. 46301(f) to
compromise the amount of a civil penalty imposed is delegated to the
Deputy Chief Counsel for Operations; the Assistant Chief Counsel for
Enforcement; Assistant Chief Counsel, Europe, Africa, and Middle East
Area Office; the Regional Counsel; the Aeronautical Center Counsel; and
the Technical Center Counsel.
(4) The authority of the Administrator under 49 U.S.C. 5123 (e) and
(f) and 49 CFR 1.47(k) to compromise the amount of a civil penalty
imposed is delegated to the Deputy Chief Counsel for Operations; the
Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement; Assistant Chief Counsel,
Europe, Africa, and Middle East Area Office; the Regional Counsel;
[[Page 1814]]
the Aeronautical Center Counsel; and the Technical Center Counsel.
(f) Notice of proposed civil penalty. A civil penalty action is
initiated by sending a notice of proposed civil penalty to the person
charged with a violation or to the agent for services for the person
under 49 U.S.C. 46103. A notice of proposed civil penalty will be sent
to the individual charged with a violation or to the president of the
corporation or company charged with a violation. In response to a
notice of proposed civil penalty, a corporation or company may
designate in writing another person to receive documents in that civil
penalty action. The notice of proposed civil penalty contains a
statement of the charges and the amount of the proposed civil penalty.
Not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of proposed civil
penalty, the person charged with a violation shall--
(1) Submit the amount of the proposed civil penalty or an agreed-
upon amount, in which case either an order assessing civil penalty or
compromise order shall be issued in that amount;
(2) Submit to the agency attorney one of the following:
(i) Written information, including documents and witness
statements, demonstrating that a violation of the regulations did not
occur or that a penalty or the amount of the penalty is not warranted
by the circumstances.
(ii) A written request to reduce the proposed civil penalty, the
amount of reduction, and the reasons and any documents supporting a
reduction of the proposed civil penalty, including records indicating a
financial inability to pay or records showing that payment of the
proposed civil penalty would prevent the person from continuing in
business.
(iii) A written request for an informal conference to discuss the
matter with the agency attorney and to submit relevant information or
documents; or
(3) Request a hearing, in which case a complaint shall be filed
with the hearing docket clerk.
(g) Final notice of proposed civil penalty. A final notice of
proposed civil penalty may be issued after participation in informal
procedures provided in paragraph(f)(2) of this section or failure to
respond in a timely manner to a notice of proposed civil penalty. A
final notice of proposed civil penalty will be sent to the individual
charged with a violation, to the president of the corporation or
company charged with a violation, or a person previously designated in
writing by the individual, corporation, or company to receive documents
in that civil penalty action. If not previously done in response to a
notice of proposed civil penalty, a corporation or company may
designate in writing another person to receive documents in that civil
penalty action. The final notice of proposed civil penalty contains a
statement of the charges and the amount of the proposed civil penalty
and, as a result of information submitted to the agency attorney during
informal procedures, may modify an allegation or a proposed civil
penalty contained in a notice of proposed civil penalty.
(1) A final notice of proposed civil penalty may be issued--
(i) If the person charged with a violation fails to respond to the
notice of proposed civil penalty within 30 days after receipt of that
notice; or
(ii) If the parties participated in any informal procedures under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section and the parties have not agreed to
compromise the action or the agency attorney has not agreed to withdraw
the notice of proposed civil penalty.
(2) Not later than 15 days after receipt of the final notice of
proposed civil penalty, the person charged with a violation shall do
one of the following--
(i) Submit the amount of the proposed civil penalty or an agreed-
upon amount, in which case either an order assessing civil penalty or a
compromise order shall be issued in that amount; or
(ii) Request a hearing, in which case a complaint shall be filed
with the hearing docket clerk.
(h) Request for a hearing. Any person charged with a violation may
request a hearing, pursuant to paragraph (f)(3) or paragraph (g)(2)(ii)
of this section, to be conducted in accordance with the procedures in
subpart G of this part. A person requesting a hearing shall file a
written request for a hearing with the hearing docket clerk (Hearing
Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 800, Independence Avenue, SW.,
Room 924A, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk) and
shall mail a copy of the request to the agency attorney. The request
for a hearing may be in the form of a letter but must be dated and
signed by the person requesting a hearing. The request for a hearing
may be typewritten or may be legibly handwritten.
(i) Hearing. If the person charged with a violation requests a
hearing pursuant to paragraph (f)(3) or paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this
section, the original complaint shall be filed with the hearing docket
clerk and a copy shall be sent to the person requesting the hearing.
The procedural rules in subpart G of this part apply to the hearing and
any appeal. At the close of the hearing, the administrative law judge
shall issue, either orally on the record or in writing, an initial
decision, including the reasons for the decision, that contains
findings or conclusions on the allegations contained, and the civil
penalty sought, in the complaint.
(j) Appeal. Either party may appeal the administrative law judge's
initial decision to the FAA decisionmaker pursuant to the procedures in
subpart G of this part. If a party files a notice of appeal pursuant to
Sec. 13.233 of subpart G, the effectiveness of the initial decision is
stayed until a final decision and order of the Administrator have been
entered on the record. The FAA decisionmaker shall review the record
and issue a final decision and order of the Administrator that affirm,
modify, or reverse the initial decision. The FAA decisionmaker may
assess a civil penalty but shall not assess a civil penalty in an
amount greater than that sought in the complaint.
(k) Payment. A person shall pay a civil penalty by sending a
certified check or money order, payable to the Federal Aviation
Administration, to the agency attorney.
(l) Collection of civil penalties. If an individual does not pay a
civil penalty imposed by an order assessing civil penalty or other
final order, the Administrator may take action provided under the law
to collect the penalty.
(m) Exhaustion of administrative remedies and judicial review. (1)
Cases under the FAA statute. A party may petition for review only of a
final decision and order of the FAA decisionmaker to the courts of
appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the individual
charged resides or has his or her principal place of business or the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit,
under 49 U.S.C. 46110, 46301(d)(6), and 46301(g). Neither an initial
decision or order issues by an administrative law judge that has not
been appealed to the FAA decisionmaker, nor an order compromising a
civil penalty action, may be appealed under those sections.
(2) Cases under the Federal hazardous materials transportation law.
A party may seek judicial review only of a final decision and order of
the FAA decisionmaker involving a violation of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law or a regulation or order issued thereunder
to an appropriate district court of the United States, under 5 U.S.C.
703 and 704 and 28 U.S.C. 1331. Neither an initial decision or order
issued by an administrative law judge that has not been appealed to the
FAA
[[Page 1815]]
decisionmaker, nor an order compromising a civil penalty action, may be
appealed under these sections.
(n) Compromise. The FAA may compromise the amount of any civil
penalty imposed under this section, under 49 U.S.C. 5123(e), 46031(f),
46303(b), or 46318 at any time before referring the action to the
United States Attorney General, or the delegate of the Attorney
General, for collection.
(1) An agency attorney may compromise any civil penalty action
where a person charged with a violation agrees to pay a civil penalty
and the FAA agrees not to make a finding of violation. Under such
agreement, a compromise order is issued following the payment of the
agreed-on amount or the signing of a promissory note. The compromise
order states the following:
(i) The person has paid a civil penalty or has signed a promissory
note providing for installment payments.
(ii) The FAA makes no finding of a violation.
(iii) The compromise order shall not be used as evidence of a prior
violation in any subsequent civil penalty proceeding or certificate
action proceeding.
(2) An agency attorney may compromise the amount of an civil
penalty proposed in a notice, assessed in an order, or imposed in a
compromise order.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 23, 2004.
Rebecca MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 05-528 Filed 1-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M