Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914 F Series Reciprocating Engines, 1815-1817 [05-486]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
decisionmaker, nor an order
compromising a civil penalty action,
may be appealed under these sections.
(n) Compromise. The FAA may
compromise the amount of any civil
penalty imposed under this section,
under 49 U.S.C. 5123(e), 46031(f),
46303(b), or 46318 at any time before
referring the action to the United States
Attorney General, or the delegate of the
Attorney General, for collection.
(1) An agency attorney may
compromise any civil penalty action
where a person charged with a violation
agrees to pay a civil penalty and the
FAA agrees not to make a finding of
violation. Under such agreement, a
compromise order is issued following
the payment of the agreed-on amount or
the signing of a promissory note. The
compromise order states the following:
(i) The person has paid a civil penalty
or has signed a promissory note
providing for installment payments.
(ii) The FAA makes no finding of a
violation.
(iii) The compromise order shall not
be used as evidence of a prior violation
in any subsequent civil penalty
proceeding or certificate action
proceeding.
(2) An agency attorney may
compromise the amount of an civil
penalty proposed in a notice, assessed
in an order, or imposed in a
compromise order.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
23, 2004.
Rebecca MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 05–528 Filed 1–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002–NE–33–AD; Amendment
39–13939; AD 2005–01–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F Series Reciprocating Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F,
912 S, and 914 F series reciprocating
engines. That AD currently requires
venting of the lubrication system and
inspection of the valve train on all
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
engines. That AD also requires venting
of the lubrication system of all engines
on which the lubrication system has
been opened, and any engine on which
the propeller has been rotated one full
turn in the wrong direction. This AD
requires similar actions, and also
requires removing the existing part
number oil dipstick from service and
installing a new oil dipstick. This AD
results from the need to clarify the
mandated procedures for inspections
and venting. This AD also results from
the manufacturer discovering that under
certain circumstances, the oil level in
the oil tank can fall below the minimum
level required to sustain proper engine
lubrication. We are issuing this AD to
prevent damage to the engine valve train
due to inadequate venting of the
lubrication system, which can result in
an in-flight engine failure and forced
landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
February 15, 2005. The Director of the
Federal Register previously approved
the incorporation by reference of certain
publications as listed in the regulations
as of October 28, 2002 (67 FR 65033,
October 23, 2002).
ADDRESSES: You can get the service
information identified in this AD from
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH, Gunskirchen,
Austria; telephone 7246–601–423; fax
7246–601–760.
You may examine the AD docket at
the FAA, New England Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA. You
may examine the service information, at
the FAA, New England Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park; telephone (781)
238–7136; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with
a proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
to supersede AD 2002–21–16. The
proposed AD applies to BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914
F series reciprocating engines. We
published the proposed AD in the
Federal Register on August 12, 2004 (69
FR 49829). That action proposed to do
the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1815
• At the next oil change, or within
100 hours TIS after the effective date of
the AD, whichever is later, remove the
oil dipstick, part number (P/N) 956150,
from service, and install a serviceable
dipstick that has a different P/N.
• Before the next engine start for
engines with 50 hours or less time-inservice (TIS) on the effective date of the
AD, since the engine had the oil system
opened, or the oil was changed using
other than specified procedures, or the
propeller was rotated more than one
turn in the wrong direction of rotation,
inspect for valve train damage, proper
venting of the lubrication system and
inspect for the correct venting of the
hydraulic valve tappets.
• Thereafter, for all engines, properly
vent the lubrication system before
starting the engine, after any of the
following:
• Initial installation of a new or
overhauled engine;
• Opening the oil system;
• Changing the oil using improper
procedures;
• The propeller was rotated more
than one turn in the wrong direction of
rotation, allowing air to be ingested into
the valve train components.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket
(including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between
8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. See
ADDRESSES for the location.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We received no
comments on the proposal or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 624 BombardierRotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914
F series reciprocating engines of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
We estimate that 282 engines installed
on aircraft of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD. We also estimate
that it will take about one work hour per
engine to perform one oil system
inspection and venting, and that the
average labor rate is $65 per work hour.
Required parts will cost about $0.85 per
engine. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S.
operators to be $18,570.
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1816
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary by sending a request to us
at the address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘AD Docket No. 2002–NE–33–
AD’’ in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
I
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
August 2002 to do the venting and
inspection.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Inspection of Engine Valve Train
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–12923 (67 FR
65033, October 23, 2002) and by adding
a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39–13939, to read as
follows:
I
2005–01–14 Bombardier-Rotax GmbH:
Amendment 39–13939. Docket No.
2002–NE–33–AD. Supersedes AD 2002–
21–16 (Amendment 39–12923).
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective February 15, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2002–21–16.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax
GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and 914 F series
reciprocating engines. These engines are
installed on, but not limited to, Diamond
Aircraft Industries, DA20–A1, Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Model HK 36 TTS,
Model HK 36TTC, and Model HK 36 TTC–
ECO, Iniziative Industriali Italiane S.p.A. Sky
Arrow 650 TC and Sky Arrow 650 TCN,
Aeromot-Industria Mecanico Metalurgica
ltda., Models AMT–300 and AMT–200S, and
Stemme S10–VT aircraft.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from the manufacturer
discovering that under certain circumstances,
the oil level in the oil tank can fall below the
minimum level required to sustain proper
engine lubrication. The actions specified in
this AD are intended to prevent damage to
the engine valve train due to inadequate
venting of the lubrication system, which can
result in an in-flight engine failure and forced
landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Venting and Inspection for Correct
Venting
(f) Before the next engine start, for all
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F series reciprocating engines that have
not been operated since doing any of the
actions identified in section 1.5(a) of Rotax
Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) SB–912–
036/SB–914–022, Revision 1, dated August
2002, do the following:
(1) Perform venting of the lubrication
system; and
(2) Perform inspection for correct venting
of the hydraulic valve tappets. Use Section
3.1.1 through section 3.1.4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Rotax MSB
SB–912–036/SB–914–022, Revision 1, dated
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(g) Before the next engine start, for all
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F series reciprocating engines that have
been operated for 50 hours or less on the
effective date of this AD since doing any of
the actions identified in section 1.5 (b) of
Rotax MSB SB–912–036/SB–914–022,
Revision 1, dated August 2002, do the
following:
(1) Disassemble and perform inspection of
the engine valve train; and
(2) Reassemble, vent the lubrication
system, and inspect for correct venting of the
hydraulic valve tappets. Use Section 3.1.5
through Section 3.1.7 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Rotax MSB SB–912–036/SB–
914–022, Revision 1, dated August 2002.
Repetitive Venting of the Lubrication System
(h) Thereafter, for all Bombardier-Rotax
GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and 914 F series
reciprocating engines, after doing any of the
actions in the following paragraphs (h)(1)
through (h)(4), vent the lubrication system
and inspect for correct venting of the
hydraulic valve tappets before starting the
engine. Use section 3.1.1 through section
3.1.4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Rotax MSB SB–912–036/SB–914–022,
Revision 1, dated August 2002 to do the
venting and inspecting.
(1) The installation of a new or overhauled
engine.
(2) The oil system has been opened
allowing air to enter the valve train (e.g. oil
pump, oil cooler, oil suction line removed
which allows oil to drain from the engine oil
galleries).
(3) The engine oil was changed using
procedures other than those included in
section 1.2 of Rotax MSB SB–912–036/SB–
914–022 Revision 1, dated August 2002.
(4) The propeller was turned more than
one turn in the wrong direction of rotation.
Removal of Existing Oil Dipstick From
Service
(i) At the next oil change or within 100
hours time-in-service after the effective date
of this AD, whichever is later, remove the oil
dipstick, part number (P/N) 956150, from
service, and install a dipstick that has a
different P/N. Information on removing oil
dipstick P/N 956150 from service can be
found in Rotax MSB SB–912–040/SB–914–
026, Revision 1, dated August 2003.
Prohibition of Oil Dipstick, P/N 956150
(j) After the effective date of this AD, do
not use dipstick P/N 956150 after complying
with paragraph (i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Special flight permits are not allowed.
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Bombardier-Rotax GmbH
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–912–036/SB–
914–022 Revision 1, dated August 2002, to
perform the venting and inspecting required
by this AD. The Director of the Federal
Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of this Mandatory
Service Bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, on October 23,
2002 (67 FR 65033). You can get a copy from
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH, Gunskirchen,
Austria; telephone 7246–601–423; fax 7246–
601–760. You can review a copy at the FAA,
New England Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Related Information
(n) Austro Control airworthiness directives
No. 113R1, dated August 30, 2002, and No.
116, dated September 15, 2003, and Rotax
Service Instruction SI–04–1997, Revision 3,
dated September 2002 also address the
subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
January 3, 2005.
Francis A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–486 Filed 1–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 520
Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs;
Ivermectin Meal
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of a new animal drug
application (NADA) filed by Merial, Ltd.
The NADA provides for use of
ivermectin meal for the control of
various species of internal parasites in
horses.
DATES: This rule is effective January 11,
2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
09:25 Jan 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7543, email: melanie.berson@fda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Merial,
Ltd., 3239 Satellite Blvd., Bldg. 500,
Duluth, GA 30096–4640, filed NADA
141–241 for ZIMECTERIN–EZ
(ivermectin) 0.6% w/w for Horses. The
application provides for use of
ivermectin meal for the control of
various species of internal parasites in
horses. The NADA is approved as of
December 16, 2004, and part 520 (21
CFR part 520) is amended by adding
new § 520.1194 to reflect the approval.
The basis of approval is discussed in the
freedom of information summary.
In accordance with the freedom of
information provisions of 21 CFR part
20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a
summary of safety and effectiveness
data and information submitted to
support approval of this application
may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Under section 512(c)(2)(F)(ii) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(ii)), this
approval qualifies for 3 years of
marketing exclusivity beginning
December 16, 2004.
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
1817
PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM
NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 520 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
2. Section 520.1194 is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 520.1194
Ivermectin meal.
(a) Specifications. Each gram of meal
contains 6 milligrams ivermectin (0.6
percent).
(b) Sponsor. See No. 050604 in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.
(c) Special considerations. See
§ 500.25 of this chapter.
(d) Conditions of use in horses—(1)
Amount. Administer 136 micrograms
(mcg) ivermectin per pound (/lb) body
weight (300 mcg/kilogram) as a single
dose on approximately 2 lb grain or
sweet feed.
(2) Indications for use. For treatment
and control of Large Strongyles (adults):
Strongylus vulgaris (also early forms in
blood vessels), S. edentatus (also tissue
stages), S. equinus, Triodontophorus
spp. including T. brevicauda and T.
serratus, and Craterostomum
acuticaudatum; Small Strongyles
(adults, including those resistant to
some benzimidazole class compounds):
Coronocyclus spp. including C.
coronatus, C. labiatus, and C. labratus,
Cyathostomum spp. including C.
catinatum and C. pateratum,
Cylicocyclus spp. including C. insigne,
C. leptostomum, C. nassatus, and C.
brevicapsulatus, Cylicodontophorus
spp., Cylicostephanus spp. including C.
calicatus, C. goldi, C. longibursatus, and
C. minutus, and Petrovinema
poculatum; Small Strongyles (fourthstage larvae); Pinworms (adults and
fourth stage larvae): Oxyuris equi;
Ascarids (adults and third- and fourthstage larvae): Parascaris equorum;
Hairworms (adults): Trichostrongylus
axei; Large Mouth Stomach Worms
(adults): Habronema muscae; Bots (oral
and gastric stages): Gasterophilus spp.
including G. intestinalis and G. nasalis;
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520
Lungworms (adults and fourth-stage
Animal drugs.
larvae): Dictyocaulus arnfieldi;
Intestinal Threadworms (adults):
I Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Strongyloides westeri; Summer Sores
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner caused by Habronema and Draschia
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the spp. cutaneous third-stage larvae;
Dermatitis caused by neck threadworm
Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR
microfilariae, Onchocerca sp.
part 520 is amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1815-1817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002-NE-33-AD; Amendment 39-13939; AD 2005-01-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912
S, and 914 F Series Reciprocating Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and 914 F series
reciprocating engines. That AD currently requires venting of the
lubrication system and inspection of the valve train on all engines.
That AD also requires venting of the lubrication system of all engines
on which the lubrication system has been opened, and any engine on
which the propeller has been rotated one full turn in the wrong
direction. This AD requires similar actions, and also requires removing
the existing part number oil dipstick from service and installing a new
oil dipstick. This AD results from the need to clarify the mandated
procedures for inspections and venting. This AD also results from the
manufacturer discovering that under certain circumstances, the oil
level in the oil tank can fall below the minimum level required to
sustain proper engine lubrication. We are issuing this AD to prevent
damage to the engine valve train due to inadequate venting of the
lubrication system, which can result in an in-flight engine failure and
forced landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective February 15, 2005. The Director of the
Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of
certain publications as listed in the regulations as of October 28,
2002 (67 FR 65033, October 23, 2002).
ADDRESSES: You can get the service information identified in this AD
from Bombardier-Rotax GmbH, Gunskirchen, Austria; telephone 7246-601-
423; fax 7246-601-760.
You may examine the AD docket at the FAA, New England Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. You may examine the service information, at the FAA,
New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park; telephone (781) 238-7136; fax (781) 238-
7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39
with a proposed airworthiness directive (AD) to supersede AD 2002-21-
16. The proposed AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S,
and 914 F series reciprocating engines. We published the proposed AD in
the Federal Register on August 12, 2004 (69 FR 49829). That action
proposed to do the following:
At the next oil change, or within 100 hours TIS after the
effective date of the AD, whichever is later, remove the oil dipstick,
part number (P/N) 956150, from service, and install a serviceable
dipstick that has a different P/N.
Before the next engine start for engines with 50 hours or
less time-in-service (TIS) on the effective date of the AD, since the
engine had the oil system opened, or the oil was changed using other
than specified procedures, or the propeller was rotated more than one
turn in the wrong direction of rotation, inspect for valve train
damage, proper venting of the lubrication system and inspect for the
correct venting of the hydraulic valve tappets.
Thereafter, for all engines, properly vent the lubrication
system before starting the engine, after any of the following:
Initial installation of a new or overhauled engine;
Opening the oil system;
Changing the oil using improper procedures;
The propeller was rotated more than one turn in the wrong
direction of rotation, allowing air to be ingested into the valve train
components.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket (including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. See ADDRESSES for the
location.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on
the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 624 Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Type 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F series reciprocating engines of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. We estimate that 282 engines installed on aircraft of
U.S. registry will be affected by this AD. We also estimate that it
will take about one work hour per engine to perform one oil system
inspection and venting, and that the average labor rate is $65 per work
hour. Required parts will cost about $0.85 per engine. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be
$18,570.
[[Page 1816]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket No. 2002-NE-33-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-12923 (67 FR
65033, October 23, 2002) and by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-13939, to read as follows:
2005-01-14 Bombardier-Rotax GmbH: Amendment 39-13939. Docket No.
2002-NE-33-AD. Supersedes AD 2002-21-16 (Amendment 39-12923).
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February
15, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2002-21-16.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F series reciprocating engines. These engines are installed on,
but not limited to, Diamond Aircraft Industries, DA20-A1, Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Model HK 36 TTS, Model HK 36TTC, and Model
HK 36 TTC-ECO, Iniziative Industriali Italiane S.p.A. Sky Arrow 650
TC and Sky Arrow 650 TCN, Aeromot-Industria Mecanico Metalurgica
ltda., Models AMT-300 and AMT-200S, and Stemme S10-VT aircraft.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from the manufacturer discovering that under
certain circumstances, the oil level in the oil tank can fall below
the minimum level required to sustain proper engine lubrication. The
actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent damage to the
engine valve train due to inadequate venting of the lubrication
system, which can result in an in-flight engine failure and forced
landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Venting and Inspection for Correct Venting
(f) Before the next engine start, for all Bombardier-Rotax GmbH
912 F, 912 S, and 914 F series reciprocating engines that have not
been operated since doing any of the actions identified in section
1.5(a) of Rotax Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) SB-912-036/SB-914-
022, Revision 1, dated August 2002, do the following:
(1) Perform venting of the lubrication system; and
(2) Perform inspection for correct venting of the hydraulic
valve tappets. Use Section 3.1.1 through section 3.1.4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Rotax MSB SB-912-036/SB-914-022,
Revision 1, dated August 2002 to do the venting and inspection.
Inspection of Engine Valve Train
(g) Before the next engine start, for all Bombardier-Rotax GmbH
912 F, 912 S, and 914 F series reciprocating engines that have been
operated for 50 hours or less on the effective date of this AD since
doing any of the actions identified in section 1.5 (b) of Rotax MSB
SB-912-036/SB-914-022, Revision 1, dated August 2002, do the
following:
(1) Disassemble and perform inspection of the engine valve
train; and
(2) Reassemble, vent the lubrication system, and inspect for
correct venting of the hydraulic valve tappets. Use Section 3.1.5
through Section 3.1.7 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Rotax
MSB SB-912-036/SB-914-022, Revision 1, dated August 2002.
Repetitive Venting of the Lubrication System
(h) Thereafter, for all Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 912 F, 912 S, and
914 F series reciprocating engines, after doing any of the actions
in the following paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4), vent the
lubrication system and inspect for correct venting of the hydraulic
valve tappets before starting the engine. Use section 3.1.1 through
section 3.1.4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Rotax MSB SB-
912-036/SB-914-022, Revision 1, dated August 2002 to do the venting
and inspecting.
(1) The installation of a new or overhauled engine.
(2) The oil system has been opened allowing air to enter the
valve train (e.g. oil pump, oil cooler, oil suction line removed
which allows oil to drain from the engine oil galleries).
(3) The engine oil was changed using procedures other than those
included in section 1.2 of Rotax MSB SB-912-036/SB-914-022 Revision
1, dated August 2002.
(4) The propeller was turned more than one turn in the wrong
direction of rotation.
Removal of Existing Oil Dipstick From Service
(i) At the next oil change or within 100 hours time-in-service
after the effective date of this AD, whichever is later, remove the
oil dipstick, part number (P/N) 956150, from service, and install a
dipstick that has a different P/N. Information on removing oil
dipstick P/N 956150 from service can be found in Rotax MSB SB-912-
040/SB-914-026, Revision 1, dated August 2003.
Prohibition of Oil Dipstick, P/N 956150
(j) After the effective date of this AD, do not use dipstick P/N
956150 after complying with paragraph (i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Special flight permits are not allowed.
[[Page 1817]]
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Bombardier-Rotax GmbH Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB-912-036/SB-914-022 Revision 1, dated August 2002, to
perform the venting and inspecting required by this AD. The Director
of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by
reference of this Mandatory Service Bulletin in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, on October 23, 2002 (67 FR 65033).
You can get a copy from Bombardier-Rotax GmbH, Gunskirchen, Austria;
telephone 7246-601-423; fax 7246-601-760. You can review a copy at
the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Related Information
(n) Austro Control airworthiness directives No. 113R1, dated
August 30, 2002, and No. 116, dated September 15, 2003, and Rotax
Service Instruction SI-04-1997, Revision 3, dated September 2002
also address the subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 3, 2005.
Francis A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05-486 Filed 1-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P