Utah State Plan for Certification of Applicators; Notice of Availability, 1708-1710 [05-513]
Download as PDF
1708
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Notices
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of
this notice.
Special Accommodations
Any person needing special
accommodations at this meeting,
including wheelchair access, should
contact Marc Santora, Designated
Federal Officer, at the number or e-mail
address listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice. Requests for special
accommodations should be made at
least five business days in advance of
the WSWG meeting.
Dated: January 4, 2005.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking
Water.
[FR Doc. 05–425 Filed 1–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[OPP–2004–0024; FRL–7344–9]
Utah State Plan for Certification of
Applicators; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The State of Utah has
submitted to EPA several amendments
to its State Plan for Certification of
Pesticide Applicators. The proposed
amendments add new subcategories as
well as a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding future
implementation of an EPA federal
pesticide certification program for the
Navajo Indian Country. Notice is hereby
given of the intention of the Regional
Administrator, Region VIII, to approve
the revised Plan for the Certification of
Applicators. EPA is soliciting comments
on the proposed amendments.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2004–
0024 must be received on or before
February 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow
the detailed instructions as provided in
Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Pesticide Program, 8PP3T, Environmental Protection Agency,
Region VIII, 999 18th St., Suite 300,
Denver, CO 80202–2466; telephone
number: (303) 312–6617; e-mail address:
barron.barbara@epa.gov; or
Jeanne Kasai, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506C), Office of
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:09 Jan 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 308–
3240; fax number: (703) 308–2962; email address: kasai.jeanne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to those involved in
agriculture and anyone involved with
the distribution and application of
pesticides for agricultural purposes.
Others involved with pesticides in a
non-agricultural setting may also be
affected. In addition, it may be of
interest to others, such as, those persons
who are or may be required to conduct
testing of chemical substances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), or the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). Since other entities may also
be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult either
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under docket identification (ID) number
OPP–2004–0024. The official public
docket consists of the documents
specifically referenced in this action,
any public comments received, and
other information related to this action.
Although a part of the official docket,
the public docket does not include
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. The official public
docket is the collection of materials that
is available for public viewing at the
Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is
important to note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA’s electronic public
docket. Public comments that are
mailed or delivered to the docket will be
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Notices
scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic
public docket. Where practical, physical
objects will be photographed, and the
photograph will be placed in EPA’s
electronic public docket along with a
brief description written by the docket
staff.
In addition to the sources listed in
this unit, you may obtain copies of the
amended Utah Certification Plan, other
related documents, or additional
information by contacting:
1. Barbara Barron, Pesticide Program,
8P-P3T, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th St., Suite
300, Denver, CO 80202–2466; telephone
number: (303) 312–6617; e-mail address:
barron.barbara@epa.gov.
2. Clark Burgess, Utah Department of
Agriculture and Food (UDAF), P.O. Box
146500, Salt Lake City, UT 84114–6500;
telephone number: (801) 538–7188; email address: cburgess@utah.gov.
3. Jeanne Kasai, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–3240; e-mail address:
kasai.jeanne@epa.gov.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper
receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate
docket ID number in the subject line on
the first page of your comment. Please
ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments. If you
wish to submit CBI or information that
is otherwise protected by statute, please
follow the instructions in Unit I.D. Do
not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit
CBI or information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an
electronic comment as prescribed in this
unit, EPA recommends that you include
your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact
information in the body of your
comment. Also include this contact
information on the outside of any disk
or CD ROM you submit, and in any
cover letter accompanying the disk or
CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the
comment and allows EPA to contact you
in case EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties or needs
further information on the substance of
your comment. EPA’s policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any
identifying or contact information
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:09 Jan 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA’s
electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets
at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘search,’’ and then key in
docket ID number OPP–2004–0024. The
system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity, e-mail address, or
other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by
e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID Number OPP–
2004–0024. In contrast to EPA’s
electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the docket without going
through EPA’s electronic public docket,
EPA’s e-mail system automatically
captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically
captured by EPA’s e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit
comments on a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to the mailing address
identified in Unit I.C.2. These electronic
submissions will be accepted in
WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to:
Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001, Attention: Docket ID
Number OPP–2004– 0024.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver
your comments to: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
Number OPP–2004–0024. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
docket’s normal hours of operation as
identified in Unit I.B.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1709
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the
Agency?
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI electronically
through EPA’s electronic public docket
or by e-mail. You may claim
information that you submit to EPA as
CBI by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI (if you submit CBI
on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
CBI). Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of
the comment that includes any
information claimed as CBI, a copy of
the comment that does not contain the
information claimed as CBI must be
submitted for inclusion in the public
docket and EPA’s electronic public
docket. If you submit the copy that does
not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
clearly that it does not contain CBI.
Information not marked as CBI will be
included in the public docket and EPA’s
electronic public docket without prior
notice. If you have any questions about
CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,
please consult the person identified
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
II. Background
FIFRA section 3 requires that
pesticide applicators become certified to
purchase, use, or supervise the use of
restricted use pesticides. FIFRA section
11 allows EPA to designate the pesticide
applicator certification program to states
with EPA-approved plans. Federal
regulations (40 CFR 171.7) describe
what constitutes an EPA-approved plan
and (40 CFR 171.8) requires that any
substantial modification to a plan must
receive prior approval from the
Administrator. EPA is seeking public
comment on amendments that are
substantial modifications to the Utah
plan.
This amendment will establish two
new subcategories under the existing
regulatory pest control category:
Predator Control/1080 Livestock
Protection Collar (LPC) and Predator
Control/M-44 Device (M-44). In October
1983, EPA Assistant Administrator for
Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Lee M. Thomas, decided to permit
registration of 1080 LPC based on an
Administrative Law Judge ruling. The
decision requires applicators of 1080
LPC to receive specific training and to
comply with recordkeeping and
reporting requirements beyond that of
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1710
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Notices
applicators of restricted use pesticides.
Therefore, a distinct certification
process is required in any state wanting
to certify applicators of 1080 LPC. The
M-44 Device (M-44) is used by certified
applicators to control predators of
livestock and poultry. Similar to LPC
1080, M-44 has specific use restrictions
that go beyond those required for most
other categories of applicators of
restricted use pesticides. The
amendments to the Utah plan satisfy the
specific training, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements for both LPC
1080 and M-44.
The Utah Department of Agriculture
and Food (UDAF) will only be certifying
employees of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Wildlife Services (WS) and
cooperative UDAF employees under the
direct supervision of WS to use 1080
LPC and M-44 in performance of their
official duties. WS is authorized by
Congress to manage wildlife damage.
UDAF certification of WS employees as
pesticide applicators will allow them to
purchase, use, and supervise the use of
1080 LPC and M-44 to carry out their
responsibility in Utah.
UDAF also proposes the following
new categories and subcategories for
commercial applicators: Vertebrate Pest
Control; Fumigation/StoredCommodities Pest Control; WoodPreservation Pest Control and WoodDestroying Organisms Pest Control.
Under the Aquatic Pest Control category
for commercial applicators, Utah is
proposing new subcategories for Surface
Water and Sewer Root Control. The plan
also includes a general provision for
proper transportation, storage and
disposal of pesticides and pesticide
containers.
UDAF is also adding a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) with EPA
Region 9 (San Francisco, CA) in
anticipation of an EPA Region 9
program to certify applicators of
restricted use pesticides in Navajo
Indian Country. EPA Region 9 expects
to issue a certificate to applicators
already possessing a valid certificate
from UDAF. The MOU establishes the
roles of UDAF and EPA Region 9 to
implement the anticipated program.
EPA finds that the proposed
amendment permitting certification of
1080 LPC applicators meets the criteria
specified in the Final Decision of
October 1983, that requires applicators
of 1080 LPC to receive specific training,
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements beyond that of other
restricted use pesticides. In addition,
EPA has determined that the proposed
M-44 sodium cyanide device
amendment complies with specific
registration requirements. EPA has
reviewed the new categories and
subcategories, the provisions for
transportation, storage and disposal, and
the MOU with EPA Region 9 to certify
applicators of restricted use pesticides
in Navajo Indian Country. Therefore,
EPA announces its intentions to
approve the amendment to the Utah
State Certification Plan.
III. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has reviewed the revised Utah
Certification Plan and finds it in
compliance with FIFRA and 40 CFR
part 171. Therefore, EPA announces its
intentions to approve the amendment to
the Utah State Certification Plan
permitting certification of 1080 LPC
applicators and M-44 sodium cyanide
device applicators. EPA is soliciting
comments on the proposed
amendments.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Education,
Pesticides and pests.
Dated: October 21, 2004.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 05–513 Filed 1–6–05; 2:31 pm]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7859–2]
Clean Water Act Section 303(d):
Availability of 13 Total Maximum Daily
Loads (TMDLs)
VerDate jul<14>2003
Jkt 205001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Caldwell at (214) 665–7513.
In 1999,
five Arkansas environmental groups, the
Sierra Club, Federation of Fly Fishers,
Crooked Creek Coalition, Arkansas Fly
Fishers, and Save our Streams
(plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit in Federal
Court against the EPA, styled Sierra
Club, et al. v. Browner, et al., No. LR–
C–99–114. Among other claims,
plaintiffs alleged that EPA failed to
establish Arkansas TMDLs in a timely
manner. EPA proposes these TMDLs
pursuant to a consent decree entered in
this lawsuit.
EPA Seeks Comments on 13 TMDLs
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability for comment of the
By this notice EPA is seeking
comment on the following 13 TMDLs
for waters located within the state of
Arkansas:
Waterbody name
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
18:09 Jan 07, 2005
Comments on the 13
TMDLs should be sent to Ellen
Caldwell, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Water Quality Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 6, 1445 Ross Ave.,
Dallas, TX 75202–2733, facsimile (214)
665–6689, or e-mail:
caldwell.ellen@epa.gov. For further
information, contact Ellen Caldwell at
(214) 665–7513. Documents from the
administrative record file for these
TMDLs are available for public
inspection at this address as well.
Documents from the administrative
record file may be viewed at https://
www.epa.gov/region6/water/
artmdl.htm, or obtained by calling or
writing Ms. Caldwell at the above
address. Please contact Ms. Caldwell to
schedule an inspection.
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
Segment-Reach
08050001–022
08050001–022
08050001–018
08050001–018
08050001–018
08050001–018
08050001–019
08050001–019
Comments must be submitted in
writing to EPA on or before February 9,
2005.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
administrative record file for 13 TMDLs
and the calculations for these TMDLs
prepared by EPA Region 6 for waters
listed in the state of Arkansas under
section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act
(CWA). These TMDLs were completed
in response to the lawsuit styled Sierra
Club, et al. v. Browner, et al., No. LR–
C–99–114.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Big Bayou ......................
Big Bayou ......................
Boeuf River ....................
Boeuf River ....................
Boeuf River ....................
Boeuf River ....................
Boeuf River ....................
Boeuf River ....................
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Pollutant
Siltation/turbidity.
Chloride.
Siltation/turbidity.
Chloride.
Sulfates.
TDS.
Siltation/turbidity.
Chloride.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1708-1710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-2004-0024; FRL-7344-9]
Utah State Plan for Certification of Applicators; Notice of
Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Utah has submitted to EPA several amendments to
its State Plan for Certification of Pesticide Applicators. The proposed
amendments add new subcategories as well as a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding future implementation of an EPA federal
pesticide certification program for the Navajo Indian Country. Notice
is hereby given of the intention of the Regional Administrator, Region
VIII, to approve the revised Plan for the Certification of Applicators.
EPA is soliciting comments on the proposed amendments.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPP-
2004-0024 must be received on or before February 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as
provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Pesticide Program, 8P-
P3T, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th St., Suite
300, Denver, CO 80202-2466; telephone number: (303) 312-6617; e-mail
address: barron.barbara@epa.gov; or
Jeanne Kasai, Field and External Affairs Division (7506C), Office
of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-3240; fax number: (703) 308-2962; e-mail address:
kasai.jeanne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to those involved in agriculture and anyone
involved with the distribution and application of pesticides for
agricultural purposes. Others involved with pesticides in a non-
agricultural setting may also be affected. In addition, it may be of
interest to others, such as, those persons who are or may be required
to conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since other entities may also be interested,
the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that
may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult either
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under docket identification (ID) number OPP-2004-0024. The
official public docket consists of the documents specifically
referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other
information related to this action. Although a part of the official
docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials
that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2,
1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly
available docket materials through the docket facility identified in
Unit I.B.1. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the
appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent
feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in
EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the
index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you
may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through
the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA intends to work
towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available
docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will
be
[[Page 1709]]
scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical,
physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description
written by the docket staff.
In addition to the sources listed in this unit, you may obtain
copies of the amended Utah Certification Plan, other related documents,
or additional information by contacting:
1. Barbara Barron, Pesticide Program, 8P-P3T, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th St., Suite 300, Denver, CO
80202-2466; telephone number: (303) 312-6617; e-mail address:
barron.barbara@epa.gov.
2. Clark Burgess, Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF),
P.O. Box 146500, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6500; telephone number: (801)
538-7188; e-mail address: cburgess@utah.gov.
3. Jeanne Kasai, Field and External Affairs Division (7506C),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-3240;
e-mail address: kasai.jeanne@epa.gov.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of
your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider
these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is
otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit
I.D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or information
protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name,
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the
outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter
accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact
you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's
policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/
edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number
OPP-2004-0024. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2004-0024. In contrast to EPA's
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I.C.2. These
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2004- 0024.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
Number OPP-2004-0024. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. You
may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part
or all of that information as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that
is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit
the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information
not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's
electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any
questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult
the person identified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
II. Background
FIFRA section 3 requires that pesticide applicators become
certified to purchase, use, or supervise the use of restricted use
pesticides. FIFRA section 11 allows EPA to designate the pesticide
applicator certification program to states with EPA-approved plans.
Federal regulations (40 CFR 171.7) describe what constitutes an EPA-
approved plan and (40 CFR 171.8) requires that any substantial
modification to a plan must receive prior approval from the
Administrator. EPA is seeking public comment on amendments that are
substantial modifications to the Utah plan.
This amendment will establish two new subcategories under the
existing regulatory pest control category: Predator Control/1080
Livestock Protection Collar (LPC) and Predator Control/M-44 Device (M-
44). In October 1983, EPA Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Lee M. Thomas, decided to permit registration of
1080 LPC based on an Administrative Law Judge ruling. The decision
requires applicators of 1080 LPC to receive specific training and to
comply with recordkeeping and reporting requirements beyond that of
[[Page 1710]]
applicators of restricted use pesticides. Therefore, a distinct
certification process is required in any state wanting to certify
applicators of 1080 LPC. The M-44 Device (M-44) is used by certified
applicators to control predators of livestock and poultry. Similar to
LPC 1080, M-44 has specific use restrictions that go beyond those
required for most other categories of applicators of restricted use
pesticides. The amendments to the Utah plan satisfy the specific
training, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for both LPC 1080
and M-44.
The Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) will only be
certifying employees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife
Services (WS) and cooperative UDAF employees under the direct
supervision of WS to use 1080 LPC and M-44 in performance of their
official duties. WS is authorized by Congress to manage wildlife
damage. UDAF certification of WS employees as pesticide applicators
will allow them to purchase, use, and supervise the use of 1080 LPC and
M-44 to carry out their responsibility in Utah.
UDAF also proposes the following new categories and subcategories
for commercial applicators: Vertebrate Pest Control; Fumigation/Stored-
Commodities Pest Control; Wood-Preservation Pest Control and Wood-
Destroying Organisms Pest Control. Under the Aquatic Pest Control
category for commercial applicators, Utah is proposing new
subcategories for Surface Water and Sewer Root Control. The plan also
includes a general provision for proper transportation, storage and
disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers.
UDAF is also adding a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with EPA
Region 9 (San Francisco, CA) in anticipation of an EPA Region 9 program
to certify applicators of restricted use pesticides in Navajo Indian
Country. EPA Region 9 expects to issue a certificate to applicators
already possessing a valid certificate from UDAF. The MOU establishes
the roles of UDAF and EPA Region 9 to implement the anticipated
program.
EPA finds that the proposed amendment permitting certification of
1080 LPC applicators meets the criteria specified in the Final Decision
of October 1983, that requires applicators of 1080 LPC to receive
specific training, recordkeeping and reporting requirements beyond that
of other restricted use pesticides. In addition, EPA has determined
that the proposed M-44 sodium cyanide device amendment complies with
specific registration requirements. EPA has reviewed the new categories
and subcategories, the provisions for transportation, storage and
disposal, and the MOU with EPA Region 9 to certify applicators of
restricted use pesticides in Navajo Indian Country. Therefore, EPA
announces its intentions to approve the amendment to the Utah State
Certification Plan.
III. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has reviewed the revised Utah Certification Plan and finds it
in compliance with FIFRA and 40 CFR part 171. Therefore, EPA announces
its intentions to approve the amendment to the Utah State Certification
Plan permitting certification of 1080 LPC applicators and M-44 sodium
cyanide device applicators. EPA is soliciting comments on the proposed
amendments.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Education, Pesticides and pests.
Dated: October 21, 2004.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 05-513 Filed 1-6-05; 2:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S