Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Bernalillo County, NM; Negative Declaration, 1668-1670 [05-342]
Download as PDF
1668
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects
Subpart XX—West Virginia
40 CFR Part 52
I
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
§ 52.2520
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: December 14, 2004.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2520 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(62) to read as
follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(62) The SO2 Redesignation Request
and Maintenance Plan for the City of
Weirton, including the Clay and Butler
Magisterial Districts in West Virginia,
submitted by the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection
on July 27, 2004:
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter of July 27, 2004 from the
West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, transmitting
the redesignation request and
maintenance plan for the City of
Weirton, including the Clay and Butler
Magisterial Districts in Hancock County,
West Virginia.
(B) The City of Weirton, including the
Clay and Butler Magisterial Districts,
Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan, dated
July 27, 2004.
(ii) Additional Material. Remainder of
the State submittal pertaining to the
revision listed in paragraph (c)(62)(i) of
this section.
PART 81—[AMENDED]
Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
Status Designations
1. The authority citation for Part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 81.349, the table for ‘‘West
Virginia—SO2’’ is amended by revising
the entry for Hancock County to read as
follows:
I
§ 81.349
*
West Virginia.
*
*
*
*
WEST VIRGINIA—SO2
Designated area
Does not meet
primary
standards
Does not meet
secondary
standards
Cannot be
classified
Better than
national
standards
Hancock County (part):
The city of Weirton, including Butler and Clay magisterial districts .........
........................
........................
........................
X
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[R06–OAR–2004–NM–0001; FRL–7858–5]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants: Bernalillo County, NM;
Negative Declaration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a negative
declaration submitted by the City of
Albuquerque (Bernalillo County), New
Mexico, which certifies that there are no
existing commercial and industrial solid
waste incineration units in Bernalillo
County subject to the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). This is a direct final rule
action without prior notice and
comment because this action is deemed
noncontroversial.
12:42 Jan 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
This rule is effective on March
11, 2005 unless adverse comments are
received by February 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Regional
Material in EDocket (RME) Docket ID
No. R06–OAR–2004–NM–0001. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the Regional Material in EDocket (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
once in the system, select ‘‘quick
search,’’ then key in the appropriate
RME Docket identification number.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy at the Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. The file will
be made available by appointment for
public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA
Review Room between the hours of 8:30
am and 4:30 pm weekdays except for
legal holidays. Contact the person listed
DATES:
[FR Doc. 05–418 Filed 1–7–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate jul<14>2003
*
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below or Mr.
Bill
Deese at (214) 665–7253 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available
for public inspection at the State Air
Agency listed below during official
business hours by appointment:
Albuquerque Environmental Health
Department, Air Pollution Control
Division, One Civic Plaza, Albuquerque,
New Mexico 87103.
Mr.
Kenneth W. Boyce, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Multimedia Planning and
Permitting Division, U.S. EPA, Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202,
(214) 665–7259, e-mail address
boyce.kenneth@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean
the EPA.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
I. What Is the Background for This
Action?
Section 129 of the CAA requires us to
develop new source performance
standards (NSPS) and emission
guidelines (EG) for each category of
solid waste incineration units which
includes these categories addressed in
today’s notice: existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incinerator units.
Such standards shall include emissions
limitations and other requirements
applicable to new units and guidelines
required by section 111(d) of the CAA.
Section 111(d) of the CAA requires
states to submit plans to control certain
pollutants (designated pollutants) at
existing facilities (designated facilities)
whenever standards of performance
have been established under section
111(b) for new sources of the same type,
and EPA has established emission
guidelines for such existing sources. A
designated pollutant is ‘‘any air
pollutant, emissions of which are
subject to a standard of performance for
new stationary sources but for which air
quality criteria have not been issued,
and which is not included on a list
published under section 108(a) or
section 112(b)(1)(A) of the CAA.’’ 40
CFR 60.21(a).
Section 129(b) of the CAA also
requires us to develop an EG for each
category of existing solid waste
incineration units. Under section 129 of
the CAA, the EG is not federally
enforceable. Section 129(b)(2) requires
states to submit State Plans to EPA for
approval. State Plans must be at least as
protective as the EG, and they become
Federally enforceable upon EPA
approval.
The emission guidelines and
compliance times for existing
commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units that commenced
construction on or before November 30,
1999, were promulgated December 1,
2000 (65 FR 75338) at 40 CFR part 60,
subparts CCCC and DDDD.
The status of our approvals of State
plans for designated facilities (often
referred to as ‘‘111(d) plans’’ or ‘‘111(d)/
129 plans’’) is given in separate subparts
in 40 CFR part 62, ‘‘Approval and
Promulgation of State Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants.’’
The Federal plan requirements for
existing solid waste incineration units
are also codified in separate subparts at
the end of part 62.
Procedures and requirements for
development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated
pollutants are given in 40 CFR part 60,
‘‘Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources,’’ subpart B,
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:42 Jan 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
‘‘Adoption and Submittal of State Plans
for Designated Facilities’’ and in 40 CFR
part 62, subpart A, ‘‘General
Provisions.’’ If a State does not have any
existing sources of a designated
pollutant located within its boundaries,
40 CFR 62.06 provides that the State
may submit a letter of certification to
that effect, or negative declaration, in
lieu of a plan. The negative declaration
exempts the State from the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 60, subpart B, for that
designated facility. In the event that a
designated facility is located in a State
after a negative declaration has been
approved by EPA, 40 CFR 62.13 requires
that the Federal plan for the designated
facility, as required by section 129 of the
CAA and 40 CFR 62.02(g), will
automatically apply to the facility.
This Federal Register action approves
a negative declaration for the following:
existing commercial and industrial solid
waste incineration units.
II. State Submittal
The Albuquerque Environmental
Health Department submitted a letter
dated September 10, 2002, certifying
that there are no existing commercial
and industrial solid waste incinerators
subject to 40 CFR part 62, subparts
CCCC and DDDD, under its jurisdiction
in the City of Albuquerque and
Bernalillo County, New Mexico
(excluding Tribal lands). This negative
declaration meets the requirements of
40 CFR 62.06.
III. Final Action
We are approving a negative
declaration submitted by the City of
Albuquerque Environmental Health
Department certifying that there are no
existing applicable commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration units
subject to 40 CFR part 60, subparts
CCCC and DDDD, under its jurisdiction
in the City of Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County (excluding tribal lands).
If a designated facility is later found
within any noted jurisdiction after
publication of this Federal Register
action, then the overlooked facility will
become subject to the requirements of
the Federal plan for that designated
facility, including the compliance
schedule. The Federal plan will no
longer apply if we subsequently receive
and approve the 111(d)/129 plan from
the jurisdiction with the overlooked
facility.
Since the City of Albuquerque has not
submitted a demonstration of authority
over ‘‘Indian Country,’’ (as defined in 18
U.S.C. 1151) we are limiting our
approval to those areas that do not
constitute Indian Country. Under this
definition, EPA treats as reservations,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1669
trust lands validly set aside for the use
of a Tribe even if the trust lands have
not been formally designated as a
reservation. Any existing designated
facility that may exist on ‘‘Indian
Country’’ is subject to the Federal plan
for the designated facility. See 40 CFR
62.13.
The EPA is publishing this action
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve these rules should
relevant adverse comments be filed.
This action will be effective March 11,
2005 unless EPA receives adverse
written comments by February 9, 2005.
If EPA receives such comments, then
it will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the
public that this direct final rule will not
take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent direct final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that
this rule will be effective on March 11,
2005 and no further action will be taken
on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state and local declarations that rules
implementing certain federal standards
are unnecessary. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves state and local
declarations that rules implementing
certain federal standards are
unnecessary, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1670
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves state and local declarations
that rules implementing certain federal
standards are unnecessary, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution
of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act. This
rule also is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing State plan submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a State plan submission
for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State plan
submission, to use VCS in place of a
State plan submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air
Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:42 Jan 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 11, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this direct final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule
for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (See 42 U.S.C.
7607(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 21, 2004.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
Part 62, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 62—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG—New Mexico
2. Subpart GG is amended by adding
a new undesignated center heading and
a new § 62.7881 to read as follows:
I
Emissions From Existing Commercial
and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
(CISWI) Units
§ 62.7881 Identification of sources—
negative declaration.
Letter from the City of Albuquerque
Air Pollution Control Division dated
September 10, 2002, certifying that there
are no existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incinerators
subject to 40 CFR part 60, subparts
CCCC and DDDD under its jurisdiction
in Bernalillo County on lands under the
jurisdiction of the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County Air Quality Control
Board.
[FR Doc. 05–342 Filed 1–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[OGC–2004–0004; FRL–7859–8]
RIN 2060–AM83
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Coke
Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and
Battery Stacks
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct
final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On October 13, 2004, the EPA
issued direct final amendments to the
national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
pushing, quenching, and battery stacks
at new and existing coke oven batteries.
The amendments were issued as a direct
final rule, along with a parallel proposal
to be used as the basis for final action
in the event EPA received any
significant adverse comments on the
direct final amendments. Because a
significant adverse comment was
received on one provision, EPA is
withdrawing the corresponding parts of
the direct final rule. We will address the
adverse comment in a subsequent final
rule based on the parallel proposal
published on October 13, 2004.
DATES: As of January 10, 2005, the EPA
withdraws the direct final amendments
to 40 CFR 63.7300(c)(1) published on
October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60813). The
remaining provisions published on
October 13, 2004, will be effective on
January 11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Docket: The EPA has
established a docket for this action
under Docket ID No. OGC–2004–0004.
All documents in the docket are listed
in the EDOCKET index at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
information, such as copyrighted
materials, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy form at Docket ID No. OGC–2004–
0004, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1668-1670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-342]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[R06-OAR-2004-NM-0001; FRL-7858-5]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants: Bernalillo County, NM; Negative Declaration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a negative declaration submitted by the City
of Albuquerque (Bernalillo County), New Mexico, which certifies that
there are no existing commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units in Bernalillo County subject to the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). This is a direct
final rule action without prior notice and comment because this action
is deemed noncontroversial.
DATES: This rule is effective on March 11, 2005 unless adverse comments
are received by February 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Regional
Material in EDocket (RME) Docket ID No. R06-OAR-2004-NM-0001. All
documents in the docket are listed in the Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, once in the system,
select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Although listed in the index, some information
is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA
Review Room between the hours of 8:30 am and 4:30 pm weekdays except
for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665-7253
to make an appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at
least two working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15
cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of
the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment:
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, Air Pollution Control
Division, One Civic Plaza, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kenneth W. Boyce, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, U.S. EPA,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202, (214) 665-7259, e-mail
address boyce.kenneth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean the EPA.
[[Page 1669]]
I. What Is the Background for This Action?
Section 129 of the CAA requires us to develop new source
performance standards (NSPS) and emission guidelines (EG) for each
category of solid waste incineration units which includes these
categories addressed in today's notice: existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incinerator units. Such standards shall include
emissions limitations and other requirements applicable to new units
and guidelines required by section 111(d) of the CAA.
Section 111(d) of the CAA requires states to submit plans to
control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing
facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards of performance
have been established under section 111(b) for new sources of the same
type, and EPA has established emission guidelines for such existing
sources. A designated pollutant is ``any air pollutant, emissions of
which are subject to a standard of performance for new stationary
sources but for which air quality criteria have not been issued, and
which is not included on a list published under section 108(a) or
section 112(b)(1)(A) of the CAA.'' 40 CFR 60.21(a).
Section 129(b) of the CAA also requires us to develop an EG for
each category of existing solid waste incineration units. Under section
129 of the CAA, the EG is not federally enforceable. Section 129(b)(2)
requires states to submit State Plans to EPA for approval. State Plans
must be at least as protective as the EG, and they become Federally
enforceable upon EPA approval.
The emission guidelines and compliance times for existing
commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units that commenced
construction on or before November 30, 1999, were promulgated December
1, 2000 (65 FR 75338) at 40 CFR part 60, subparts CCCC and DDDD.
The status of our approvals of State plans for designated
facilities (often referred to as ``111(d) plans'' or ``111(d)/129
plans'') is given in separate subparts in 40 CFR part 62, ``Approval
and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants.'' The Federal plan requirements for existing solid waste
incineration units are also codified in separate subparts at the end of
part 62.
Procedures and requirements for development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated pollutants are given in 40 CFR part
60, ``Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources,'' subpart B,
``Adoption and Submittal of State Plans for Designated Facilities'' and
in 40 CFR part 62, subpart A, ``General Provisions.'' If a State does
not have any existing sources of a designated pollutant located within
its boundaries, 40 CFR 62.06 provides that the State may submit a
letter of certification to that effect, or negative declaration, in
lieu of a plan. The negative declaration exempts the State from the
requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, subpart B, for that designated
facility. In the event that a designated facility is located in a State
after a negative declaration has been approved by EPA, 40 CFR 62.13
requires that the Federal plan for the designated facility, as required
by section 129 of the CAA and 40 CFR 62.02(g), will automatically apply
to the facility.
This Federal Register action approves a negative declaration for
the following: existing commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units.
II. State Submittal
The Albuquerque Environmental Health Department submitted a letter
dated September 10, 2002, certifying that there are no existing
commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators subject to 40 CFR
part 62, subparts CCCC and DDDD, under its jurisdiction in the City of
Albuquerque and Bernalillo County, New Mexico (excluding Tribal lands).
This negative declaration meets the requirements of 40 CFR 62.06.
III. Final Action
We are approving a negative declaration submitted by the City of
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department certifying that there are
no existing applicable commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units subject to 40 CFR part 60, subparts CCCC and DDDD,
under its jurisdiction in the City of Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
(excluding tribal lands).
If a designated facility is later found within any noted
jurisdiction after publication of this Federal Register action, then
the overlooked facility will become subject to the requirements of the
Federal plan for that designated facility, including the compliance
schedule. The Federal plan will no longer apply if we subsequently
receive and approve the 111(d)/129 plan from the jurisdiction with the
overlooked facility.
Since the City of Albuquerque has not submitted a demonstration of
authority over ``Indian Country,'' (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151) we
are limiting our approval to those areas that do not constitute Indian
Country. Under this definition, EPA treats as reservations, trust lands
validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have
not been formally designated as a reservation. Any existing designated
facility that may exist on ``Indian Country'' is subject to the Federal
plan for the designated facility. See 40 CFR 62.13.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve these rules should relevant
adverse comments be filed. This action will be effective March 11, 2005
unless EPA receives adverse written comments by February 9, 2005.
If EPA receives such comments, then it will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. All public comments received
will then be addressed in a subsequent direct final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such
comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be
effective on March 11, 2005 and no further action will be taken on the
proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state and local declarations that rules implementing
certain federal standards are unnecessary. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves state and local declarations that rules implementing certain
federal standards are unnecessary, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
[[Page 1670]]
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This
action merely approves state and local declarations that rules
implementing certain federal standards are unnecessary, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing State plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a State plan submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a
State plan submission, to use VCS in place of a State plan submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule
does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 11, 2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this direct final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (See 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 21, 2004.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
Part 62, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
0
2. Subpart GG is amended by adding a new undesignated center heading
and a new Sec. 62.7881 to read as follows:
Emissions From Existing Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste
Incineration (CISWI) Units
Sec. 62.7881 Identification of sources--negative declaration.
Letter from the City of Albuquerque Air Pollution Control Division
dated September 10, 2002, certifying that there are no existing
commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators subject to 40 CFR
part 60, subparts CCCC and DDDD under its jurisdiction in Bernalillo
County on lands under the jurisdiction of the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County Air Quality Control Board.
[FR Doc. 05-342 Filed 1-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P