Determination of Insufficient Assets To Satisfy All Claims of Financial Institution in Receivership, 1443-1444 [E5-31]
Download as PDF
1443
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
Control Strategy and a requirement of
Healthy People 2010 supporting the
President’s pledge to reduce America’s
drug use by 25 percent in five years
through building community capacity to
prevent substance abuse among our
nation’s youth. The DFC has two
primary goals: (1) Reduce substance
abuse among youth by addressing local
risk and protective factors to minimize
the likelihood of subsequent substance
abuse in the community; and (2)
support community anti-drug coalitions
in becoming self-sufficient by
establishing, strengthening, and
fostering collaboration among public
and private nonprofit agencies, as well
information for both ONDCP and the
National Evaluation. The Evaluation
Questionnaire will be used on an annual
basis and will answer evaluation
questions that are not appropriate for
the Monitoring and Tracking
instrument. The Typology Classification
Questionnaire will be used on an annual
basis to classify respondents into a
coalition typology developed by the
evaluation contractor.
Frequency: Quarterly and annually;
Affected Public: Anti-Drug Coalitions;
Type of Respondents: Directors of
Anti-Drug Coalitions or their designees;
Estimated annual burden is as
follows:
as federal, state, local, and tribal
governments to prevent and reduce
substance abuse.
A National Evaluation of the DFC
Support Program commenced in
September 2004 to assess the program’s
implementation and effectiveness. The
major purpose of the DFC Support
Program National Evaluation is to
design and implement a rigorous
evaluation and to support an effective
grant monitoring and tracking system.
The National Evaluation will make
use of three separate collection
instruments to gather information. The
Monitoring and Tracking Questionnaire
will serve as a quarterly report for the
DFC grantees, and will provide
Estimated
number of responses per
respondent
Estimated
number of respondents
Type of respondents
Average burden per response (in
hours)
Total annual
burden (in
hours)
Instrument: Monitoring and Tracking Questionnaire (Quarterly Report)
DFC Grantee Program Directors .....................................................................
714
4
1.5
1.0
4284
714
Instrument: Evaluation Questionnaire
DFC Grantee Program Directors .....................................................................
1
Instrument: Typology Classification Questionnaire
DFC Grantee Program Directors .....................................................................
714
1
1.5
1071
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
6069
The only cost to respondents is time
they spend completing the
questionnaire(s). Data collected from
grantees will be made available to them
for planning, implimentation, and
evaluation purposes. There are no
Capital Costs to report. There are no
Operating or Maintenance Costs to
report.
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or recommendations
from the public and affected entities are
invited on one or more of the following
points: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the DFC program, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
those who are able to respond,
including the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comment Deadline: Comments
regarding these proposed information
collections must be mailed and/or faxed
to the designee listed below, within 60days of the date of this publication:
Executive Office of the President, Office
of National Drug Control Policy, Drug
Free Communities Support Program,
Attention: Keri-Lyn Coleman, MSW,
Acting DFCSP Administrator,
Washington, DC 20503. Fax number:
202–395–6641.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To
request more information on the
proposed information collections or to
obtain a copy of the information
collection plans and/or instruments,
contact Keri-Lyn Coleman, MSW,
Acting DFCSP Administrator, Executive
Office of the President, Office of
National Drug Control Policy,
Washington DC 20503, or call non-toll
free number 202–395–6762 or e-mail
your request to: KeriLyn_S._Coleman@ondcp.eop.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: January 3, 2005.
Norman R. Deck,
Assistant Deputy Director, Office of National
Drug Control Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–323 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3180–02–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Determination of Insufficient Assets To
Satisfy All Claims of Financial
Institution in Receivership
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has
determined that the proceeds that can
be realized from the liquidation of assets
of the receivership listed in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION are
insufficient to wholly satisfy the priority
claims of depositors against the
receivership estate. Therefore, upon
satisfaction of secured claims, depositor
claims, and claims which have priority
over depositors under applicable law,
no amount will remain or will be
recovered sufficient to allow a dividend,
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
1444
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
distribution, or payment to any creditor
of lesser priority, including but not
limited to claims of general creditors.
Any such claims are hereby determined
to be worthless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Bolt, Counsel, Legal Division,
FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Room H–
11052, Washington, DC 20429.
Telephone: (202) 736–0168.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Financial
Institution in Receivership Determined
To Have Insufficient Assets to Satisfy
All Claims, FIN 4662, Pulaski Savings
Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–31 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
[No. 2004–N–13]
Notice of Annual Adjustments
AGENCY:
Federal Housing Finance
Board.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Federal Housing Finance
Board (Finance Board) has adjusted the
cap on average total assets that defines
a ‘‘Community Financial Institution’’
(CFI) and the limits on annual
compensation for Federal Home Loan
Bank (Bank) directors based on the
annual percentage increase in the
Consumer Price Index for all urban
consumers (CPI–U), as published by the
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The
Finance Board also has made similar
adjustments to the maximum dollar
limits on certain allocations by a Bank
of its annual required Affordable
Housing Program (AHP) contributions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott L. Smith, Associate Director, by
telephone at (202) 408–2991 or by
electronic mail at smiths@fhfb.gov, or
Mark Edward Stover, Senior Economist,
by telephone at (202) 408–2828 or by
electronic mail at stoverm@fhfb.gov.
Send regular mail to the Federal
Housing Finance Board, Office of
Supervision, Regulations and Research,
1777 F Street, NW., Washington, DC
20006.
SUMMARY:
The Bank
Act and Finance Board regulations
require publication of annual
adjustments to the following dollar
amounts, based on any increase in the
CPI–U, as published by the DOL:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
• The cap on average total assets that
defines a CFI (CFI Asset Cap). See 12
U.S.C. 1422(13) and 12 CFR 925.1.
• The limits on annual compensation
for Bank directors. See 12 U.S.C.
1427(i)(2) and 12 CFR 918.3(a).
• Maximum dollar limits allocations
by a Bank of its annual required AHP
contributions towards homeownership
set-aside programs and an additional
homeownership set-aside program
assisting first-time homebuyers, and
from its annual required AHP
contribution for the subsequent year to
the current year’s competitive
application program. See 12 CFR
951.3(a)(1)–(2).
These annual adjustments, which are
effective January 1, 2005, are based on
the percentage increase in the CPI–U
from November 2003 to November 2004.
The CPI–U increased 3.5 percent from
November 2003 to November 2004.
The Finance Board uses data from
November rather than waiting for the
December data, which is published in
mid-January, in order to provide notice
to the Banks as close to the January 1st
effective date as possible. This is
consistent with the practice of other
Federal agencies that rely on other than
December data when calculating annual
inflation adjustments so they can
announce their adjustments prior to the
effective date of January 1. The Finance
Board also uses data that has not been
seasonally adjusted. The DOL
encourages the use of CPI–U data that
has not been seasonally adjusted in
‘‘escalation agreements’’ because
seasonal factors are updated annually
and seasonally adjusted data are subject
to revision for up to five years following
the original release. Unadjusted data are
not routinely subject to revision, and
previously published unadjusted data
are corrected only when significant
calculation errors are discovered.
Based on the 3.5 percent increase in
the CPI–U, the Finance Board has made
the following adjustments, effective
January 1, 2005:
• CFI Asset Cap. The CFI Asset Cap
increased to $567 million (2004 limit
was $548 million). The Finance Board
arrived at the adjusted limit of $567
million by rounding to the nearest
million.1
• Bank Director Compensation. The
annual compensation limits for Bank
directors increased for a chairperson to
$28,364 (2004 limit was $27,405), for a
vice-chairperson to $22,692 (2004 limit
was $21,924), and for all other board
members to $17,019 (2004 limit was
$16,443). The Finance Board arrived at
these adjusted annual compensation
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
limits by rounding to the nearest
dollar.1
• AHP. The limit on contributions
towards homeownership set-aside
programs increased to $3.2 million
(2004 limit was $3.1 million). The limit
on contributions towards an additional
first-time homebuyer set-aside program
remains at $1.6 million. The limit on
allocations from a Bank’s annual
required AHP contribution for the
subsequent year to the current year’s
competitive application program
increased to $3.2 million (2004 limit
was $3.1 million). The limits on
allocations from AHP contributions are
rounded to the nearest $100,000.1
Dated: December 30, 2004.
By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Ronald A. Rosenfeld,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 05–305 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6725–01–P
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Unmodified Qualified Trust
Model Certificates and Model Trust
Documents
AGENCY:
Office of Government Ethics
(OGE).
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: After this first round notice
and public comment period, OGE plans
to submit the executive branch qualified
trust model certificates and model trust
documents to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for two-year
extension of approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. In all, a total
of twelve OGE model certificates and
model documents for qualified trusts are
involved. OGE is proposing no changes
to these forms.
DATES: Comments by the public and
agencies on this proposed information
collection extension are invited and
should be received by March 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent
to: Mary T. Donovan, Office of
Administration and Information
Management, U.S. Office of Government
Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
3917. Comments may also be sent
electronically to OGE’s E-mail address
at usoge@oge.gov (for E-mail messages,
the subject line should include the
following reference—‘‘Qualified trust
1 Since the calculations are based on cumulative
CPI–U changes applied to the limits as they first
appeared in Finance Board regulations, the changes
are not distorted over time by rounding.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1443-1444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-31]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Determination of Insufficient Assets To Satisfy All Claims of
Financial Institution in Receivership
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has
determined that the proceeds that can be realized from the liquidation
of assets of the receivership listed in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION are
insufficient to wholly satisfy the priority claims of depositors
against the receivership estate. Therefore, upon satisfaction of
secured claims, depositor claims, and claims which have priority over
depositors under applicable law, no amount will remain or will be
recovered sufficient to allow a dividend,
[[Page 1444]]
distribution, or payment to any creditor of lesser priority, including
but not limited to claims of general creditors. Any such claims are
hereby determined to be worthless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Bolt, Counsel, Legal Division,
FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Room H-11052, Washington, DC 20429.
Telephone: (202) 736-0168.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Financial Institution in Receivership
Determined To Have Insufficient Assets to Satisfy All Claims, FIN 4662,
Pulaski Savings Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-31 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P