Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings, 1428-1431 [E5-27]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
1428
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
Reasons for revisions
Revision size (absolute value)
Survey data
change
7–14 Bcf .............................................................................................................................................
15 or more Bcf ...................................................................................................................................
With respect to the dissemination of
revisions to WNGSR data, EIA is
reconsidering its policy. Important
issues to consider include: the size of a
revision justifying a revised WNGSR
release, the problem of equal and
adequate notification of an upcoming
revision, and the timing of revisions in
light of government and market hours of
operation. The current policy and two
examples of alternative policies are
described below.
Current Policy (No Unscheduled
Release of Revisions). Revisions are
disseminated in the next release of the
WNGSR when the effect of changes from
any cause is at least 7 billion cubic feet
(Bcf) at either a regional or national
level. If a revision is made, changes to
all regions are included. Revisions are
not disseminated on an unscheduled
basis.
Alternative 1 (Fixed Revision
Timing). When the cumulative effect of
all revised data for the most recent
report period is at least 15 billion cubic
feet (BCF) at either a regional or national
level, a revised WNGSR would be
issued prior to the customary WNGSR
release schedule (i.e., generally
Thursday at 10:30 a.m.). If a revision is
necessary, it would be released in a
revised WNGSR at 10:30 a.m. on the
first Federal government workday of the
following week. In most instances the
timing would be 10:30 a.m. Monday
unless there is a Monday holiday. In
that case the revision would be released
on Tuesday. No notification of a coming
revision would be provided. If the
issues underlying the revision could not
be resolved and systems changes could
not be implemented before the fixed
release date, the revision would be
released during the next regularly
scheduled WNGSR release (usually
Thursday morning). Revisions from 7 to
14 Bcf as well as a revision greater than
7 Bcf resulting from a new estimation
methodology or sample used in the
estimation process would be issued in
the next regularly scheduled (usually
Thursday) release of the WNGSR. This
alternative provides a date and time for
a mid-week release of a revision greater
than 15 Bcf without relying on any
notification to users of the estimates.
Alternative 2 (Variable Revision
Timing). When the cumulative effect of
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
revised data for the most recent report
period is at least 15 billion cubic feet
(BCF) at either a regional or national
level, a revised WNGSR would be
issued two hours after EIA issues a
notification of the planned release of the
revised WNGSR. However, EIA would
not issue a revised WNGSR if the next
scheduled release is less than 24 hours
later. Also, revisions from 7 to 14 Bcf as
well as a revision of any magnitude
greater than 7 Bcf resulting from a new
estimation methodology or sample used
in the estimation process would be
issued in the next release of the
WNGSR.
For alternative 2, EIA would notify
the public of the planned release by
announcing it on its Web site and
sending e-mail notifications to parties
registered on EIA’s WNGSR list serve.
(Interested parties may sign up for the
WNGSR list serve without charge
through the EIA Web site at https://
www.eia.doe.gov/listserv_signup.html.)
EIA proposes that the revision be
released two hours after the
announcement is posted and e-mail
notices are issued irrespective of
whether any specific markets are in
operation at the time of the revision
release. EIA would post a notification of
an upcoming revision only when it has
resolved all implementation issues and
is prepared to issue the revised WNGSR
two hours later. Also, revisions from 7
to 14 Bcf as well as a revision of any
magnitude greater than 7 Bcf resulting
from a new estimation methodology or
sample used in the estimation process
would be issued in the next release of
the WNGSR.
Methodology
or sample
change
5
2
All reasons
1
2
6
4
threshold change of 15 Bcf appropriate
to require such an issuance?
C. Is a fixed revision date and time a
useful alternative to an approach
requiring a notification process for EIA
customers? What particular dates and/or
times are most appropriate?
D. If a notification approach is used,
is a posting on EIA’s web site and e-mail
notification adequate and equitable?
How much time should pass between a
notification of a revised WNGSR and its
release?
E. Should the release of a revised
WNGSR be restricted to specific
business hours or days because of the
operating hours of various trading
markets? For example, if a revised
WNGSR is approved late in the work
day, should EIA withhold issuing it
until specific major energy markets are
open?
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be considered during
development of EIA’s policy for
revisions of the WNGSR. The comments
will also become a matter of public
record.
After EIA has completed development
of the WNGSR revision policy, a
Federal Register notice will be issued
announcing the policy.
Statutory Authority: Section 52 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act (Pub. L.
No. 93–275, 15 U.S.C. 790a).
Issued in Washington, DC, January 3, 2005.
Jay H. Casselberry,
Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–333 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
III. Request for Comments
The public should comment on the
alternatives discussed in item II as well
as the questions below. Comments may
also address other issues and
alternatives related to changes in the
WNGSR revision policy.
General Issues:
A. What policy do you prefer for
release of revised WNGSR data and
why? What are the features of each
policy that are attractive and
unattractive?
B. What is the threshold, if any, at
which a revised WNGSR should be
issued outside a regular schedule? Is a
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EC05–28–000, et al.]
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., et al.;
Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
December 30, 2004.
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
1. Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Cedar
Brakes I, L.L.C., Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C.,
El Paso Marketing, L.P., Okwari CB
Holdings LP, and Constellation Energy
Commodities Group, Inc.
[Docket No. EC05–28–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Mesquite Investors, L.L.C.
(Mesquite), Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C. (CB I),
Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (CB II), El Paso
Marketing, L.P. (El Paso Marketing),
Okwari CB Holdings LP (Okwari CB)
and Constellation Energy Commodities
Group, Inc. (CCG) (jointly, Applicants)
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission an application pursuant to
Section 203 of the Federal Power Act
requesting that the Commission
authorize: (i) The transfer of all of
Mesquite’s membership interests in CB
I and CB II to Okwari CB; (ii) the
subsequent sale and transfer of up to 51
percent of the membership interests
thus obtained by Okwari CB to as yet
unidentified purchasers; and (iii) the
assignment of power purchase
agreements from El Paso Marketing to
CCG. Applicants requested privileged
treatment for certain exhibits pursuant
to 18 CFR 33.9 and 388.112. Applicants
also requested expedited consideration
of this Application.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
2. Detroit Edison Company, DTE Energy
Trading, Inc., DTE Edison America,
Inc., DTE Energy Marketing Inc., DTE
Georgetown L.P., DTE River Rouge No.
1, L.L.C. and Crete Energy Venture,
L.L.C.
[Docket Nos. ER97–324–007, ER97–3834–
012, ER98–3026–008, ER99–3368–004,
ER00–1746–002, ER00–1816–003 and ER02–
963–004]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, The Detroit Edison Company, DTE
Energy Trading, Inc., DTE Edison
America, Inc., DTE Energy Marketing,
Inc., DTE Georgetown, L.P., DTE River
Rouge No. 1, L.L.C., and Crete Energy
Venture, L.L.C. (collectively, the DTE
Parties) tendered for filing a joint market
power update analysis in compliance
with the Commission’s order in Acadia
Power Partners, L.L.C., 107 FERC
¶ 61,168 (2004).
The DTE Parties state that copies of
the filing were served on parties on the
official service lists in the abovecaptioned proceedings.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
3. Cleo Power LLC, Cleco Marketing &
Trading LLC, Cleco Evangeline LLC and
Perryville Energy Partners, LLC.
[Docket Nos. ER99–3855–003, ER99–2300–
005, ER99–2928–002 and ER02–1406–004]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Cleco Power LLC, Cleco
Evangeline LLC, and Perryville Energy
Partners, LLC submitted generation
market power screens and related
analyses.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
4. Black Hills Colorado, LLC, Black
Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills
Pepperell Power Associates, Inc., Black
Hills Power, Inc., Fountain Valley
Power, LLC, Harbor Cogeneration
Company, LLC and Las Vegas
Cogeneration II, LLC
[Docket Nos. ER00–1952–002, ER03–802–
002, ER96–1635–009, ER99–2287–002,
ER01–1784–005, ER99–1248–004 and ER03–
222–004]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Black Hills Colorado, LLC, Black
Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills
Pepperell Power Associates, Inc., Black
Hills Power, Inc., Fountain Valley
Power, LLC, Harbor Cogeneration
Company, LLC, and Las Vegas
Cogeneration II, LLC, filed with the
Commission updated market power
analyses.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
5. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation,
Arizona Public Service Company,
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation and
APS Energy Services Company, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER00–2268–008, ER99–4124–
006, ER00–3312–007 and ER99–4122–009]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, the Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation (PWCC), the Arizona Public
Service Company (APS), the Pinnacle
West Energy Corporation (PWEC) and
APS Energy Services Company, Inc.
(APSES) (collectively, the Pinnacle West
Companies), submitted a compliance
filing pursuant to the Commission’s
order issued December 20, 2004 in
Docket No. ER00–2268–005, et al., FERC
¶ 61,295 (2004).
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
6. Entergy Services, Inc.,
[Docket No. ER04–35–003]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of
the Entergy Operating Companies,
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf
States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc.,
Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy
New Orleans, Inc., tendered its
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1429
compliance filing in response to the
Commission’s order in Entergy Services,
Inc., 109 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2004).
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
7. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER04–435–006]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) tendered for filing
revisions to its Wholesale Distribution
Access Tariff (WDAT), FERC Electric
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, in
compliance with the Commission’s
Order issued September 22, 2004 in
Docket Nos. ER04–435–002 and ER04–
435–004, 108 FERC ¶ 61,301.
SCE states that copies of this filing
were served on parties on the official
service list in the above-captioned
proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
8. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. ER04–474–003]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM)
submitted a substitute interconnection
service agreement among PJM,
Industrial Power Generating
Corporation, and Monongahela Power
Company, The Potomac Edison
Company, and West Penn Power
Company, all doing business as
Allegheny Power consistent with PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., 109 FERC
¶ 61,030 (2004), issued on October 7,
2004 in Docket Nos. ER04–474–000 and
ER04–474–001.
PJM states that copies of the filing
were served on parties on the official
service list in the above-captioned
proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
9. Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator, Inc. and Public
Utilities With Grandfathered
Agreements in the Midwest ISO Region
[Docket Nos. ER04–691–014 and EL04–104–
013]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.
(Midwest ISO) submitted proposed
revisions to the Midwest ISO’s Open
Access Transmission and Energy
Markets Tariff (EMT), FERC Electric
Tariff, Volume No. 1, and
supplementary information and
explanations concerning certain matters,
in order to make typographical
corrections and clarifying changes to the
EMT.
The Midwest ISO has requested
waiver of the service requirements set
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
1430
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
forth in 18 CFR 385.2010. The Midwest
ISO states it has electronically served a
copy of this filing, with attachments,
upon all Midwest ISO Members,
Member representatives of Transmission
Owners and Non-Transmission Owners,
the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee
participants, as well as all state
commissions within the region.
Midwest ISO further states that in
addition, the filing has been
electronically posted on the Midwest
ISO’s Web site at www.midwestiso.org
under the heading ‘‘Filings to FERC’’ for
other interested parties in this matter.
The Midwest ISO will provide hard
copies to any interested parties upon
request.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
10. CalPeak Power—Border, LLC,
CalPeak Power—Enterprise, LLC and
CalPeak Power—Vaca Dixon, LLC
[Docket Nos. ER05–302–001, ER05–303–001
and ER05–304–001]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004 CalPeak Power—Border, LLC
(Border), CalPeak Power—Enterprise,
LLC (Enterprise) and CalPeak Power—
Vaca Dixon, LLC (Vaca Dixon)
(collectively, CalPeak Entities),
submitted for filing corrections to
certain terms contained in schedules to
the reliability must-run service
agreements between Border and the
California Independent System Operator
Corporation (ISO), Enterprise and the
ISO, and Vaca Dixon and the ISO,
originally filed on December 6, 2004.
CalPeak Entities request an effective
date of January 1, 2005.
CalPeak Entities state that copies of
the filing were served upon the ISO, San
Diego Gas & Electric Company, Pacific
Gas & Electric Company, the California
Public Utilities Commission and the
California Electricity Oversight Board.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
11. Michigan Electric Transmission
Company, LLC
[Docket No. ER05–364–000]
Take notice that on December 21,
2004, Michigan Electric Transmission
Company, LLC (METC) submitted an
executed Cost Reimbursement
Agreement between METC and
Michigan Public Power Agency, an
executed Cost Reimbursement
Agreement between METC and
Michigan South Central Power Agency,
and an executed Cost Reimbursement
Agreement between METC and
Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative,
Inc.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 11, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
12. Arroyo Energy LP
[Docket No. ER05–375–000]
Take notice that on December 21,
2004, as amended on December 23,
2004, Arroyo Energy LP (Arroyo) filed a
notice of succession to notify the
Commission that, as a result of a name
change, Arroyo Energy LP has
succeeded to the Rate Schedule FERC
No. 1 of BS Energy LP.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
13. Southern California Edison
Company
[Docket No. ER05–376–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a
Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service (WDAT Service
Agreement), Service Agreement No. 133
under the Wholesale Distribution
Access Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, First
Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE
and the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California (MWD). The
purpose of the WDAT Service
Agreement is to specify the terms and
conditions under which SCE will
provide Wholesale Distribution Service
from MWD’s Small Hydro Facilities to
the California Independent System
Operator Controlled Grid.
SCE states that copies of the filing
were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California
and MWD.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
14. MidAmerican Energy Company
[Docket No. ER05–377–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, MidAmerican Energy Company
(MidAmerican), filed with the
Commission a Network Integration
Transmission Service Agreement and a
Network Operating Agreement between
MidAmerican Energy Company and the
City of Buffalo, Iowa (Buffalo).
MidAmerican requests an effective date
of January 1, 2005, for these
Agreements.
MidAmerican states it has served a
copy of the filing on Buffalo, the Iowa
Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce
Commission and the South Dakota
Public Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
15. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[Docket No. ER05–378–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(PG&E) submitted its Transmission
Owner Tariff for the Transmission
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Access Charge Balancing Account.
PG&E requests an effective date of April
1, 2005.
PG&E states that copies of the filing
were served upon the California Public
Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
16. Southern California Edison
Company
[Docket No. ER05–380–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted a Letter
Agreement between SCE and the
Southern California Water Company
(SCWC). SCE states that the purpose of
the Letter Agreement is to provide an
interim arrangement pursuant to which
SCE will commence the engineering,
design and procurement of equipment
and material for, and construction of
certain additional facilities, as described
in Exhibit A of the Letter Agreement,
required in order for SCWC’s generation
plant to operate in parallel with SCE’s
electric system.
SCE states that copies of the filing
were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California
and SCWC.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
17. California Independent System
[Docket No. ER05–381–000 Operator
Corporation]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, the California Independent
System Operator Corporation (ISO)
tendered for filing revisions to the
Transmission Control Agreement (TCA)
for acceptance by the Commission. The
ISO states that the purpose of the
revisions are to: (1) Identify the
transmission interests (i.e., the
transmission facilities and Entitlements)
that the City of Pasadena, California
(Pasadena) will be turning over to the
ISO’s Operational Control, by including
those interests in a new Appendix A to
the TCA, (2) identify the Encumbrances
associated with those interests, by
listing the Encumbrances in a new
Appendix B to the TCA; and (3) identify
the persons to contact at Pasadena for
notice purposes by expanding Appendix
F to the TCA. The ISO requests an
effective date of January 1, 2005.
The ISO states that this filing has been
served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California;
the California Energy Commission; the
California Electricity Oversight Board;
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; San
Diego Gas & Electric Company;
Southern California Edison Company;
the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning,
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
and Riverside, California (the Southern
Cities); the City of Vernon, California;
Trans-Elect NTD Path 15, LLC; Western
Area Power Administration—Sierra
Nevada Region; Pasadena; and all
parties with effective Scheduling
Coordinator Agreements under the ISO
Tariff. The ISO states it has posted this
filing on the ISO Home Page.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
18. Southern California Edison
Company
[Docket No. ER05–382–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a
Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service (WDAT Service
Agreement), Service Agreement No. 134
under the Wholesale Distribution
Access Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, First
Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE
and The Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California (MWD). SCE states
that the purpose of the WDAT Service
Agreement is to specify the terms and
conditions under which SCE will
provide Wholesale Distribution Service
from MWD’s Etiwanda Power Plant to
the California Independent System
Operator Controlled Grid.
SCE states that copies of the filing
were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California
and MWD.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
19. Port Washington Generating Station
LLC
[Docket No. ER05–383–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, Port Washington Generating
Station LLC (PWGS) submitted for filing
under section 205 of the Federal Power
Act, a Power Purchase Agreement
providing for sales of test power
between PWGS and Wisconsin Electric
Power Company. PWGS states that the
test power provides the terms and
conditions pursuant to which, prior to
the commencement of commercial
operations, PWGS will sell test power
from its Port Washington Unit 1 facility
to Wisconsin Electric.
PWGS states that copies of the filing
were served upon the Public Service
Commission of Wisconsin.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
20. Southern California Edison
Company
[Docket No. ER05–384–000]
Take notice, that on December 23,
2004, Southern California Edison
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Company (SCE) tendered for filing
notice of cancellation of its First
Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 292
and First Revised Rate Schedule FERC
No. 318. SCE requests an effective date
of January 1, 2005.
SCE states that copies of this filing
were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California
and the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 13, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–27 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1431
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EC05–29–000, et al.]
PNM Resources, Inc., et al.; Electric
Rate and Corporate Filings
December 29, 2004.
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
1. PNM Resources, Inc., SW
Acquisition, L.P., TNP Enterprises, Inc.,
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
[Docket EC05–29–000]
Take notice that on December 23,
2004, PNM Resources, Inc. (PNM
Resources), SW Acquisition, L.P. (SW
Acquisition), TNP Enterprises, Inc.
(TNP Enterprises), and Texas-New
Mexico Power Company (TNMP)
tendered for filing an application
pursuant to section 203 of the Federal
Power Act requesting all necessary
Commission authorizations related to
the sale by SW Acquisition to PNM
Resources of 100 percent of the
outstanding common shares of TNP
Enterprises, the direct parent of, among
other entities, TNMP.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 28, 2005.
2. Calpine Bethpage 3, LLC
[Docket No. EG05–26–000]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Calpine Bethpage 3, LLC
(Applicant), c/o Calpine Corporation,
Two Atlantic Avenue, Third Floor,
Boston, MA 02110, filed with the
Commission an application for
determination of exempt wholesale
generator status pursuant to part 365 of
the Commission’s regulations.
Applicant, a Delaware limited
liability company, proposes to operate a
79.9 megawatt natural gas-fired
combined cycle electric generating
facility located in the Town of Oyster
Bay, Nassau County, New York.
Applicant states that copies of the
application were served upon the
United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and New York State Public
Service Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
3. Bethpage Energy Center
[Docket No. EG05–27–000]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC
(Applicant), c/o Calpine Corporation,
Two Atlantic Avenue, Third Floor,
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1428-1431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-27]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC05-28-000, et al.]
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate
Filings
December 30, 2004.
The following filings have been made with the Commission. The
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket
classification.
[[Page 1429]]
1. Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C., Cedar Brakes II,
L.L.C., El Paso Marketing, L.P., Okwari CB Holdings LP, and
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.
[Docket No. EC05-28-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Mesquite Investors, L.L.C.
(Mesquite), Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C. (CB I), Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (CB
II), El Paso Marketing, L.P. (El Paso Marketing), Okwari CB Holdings LP
(Okwari CB) and Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. (CCG)
(jointly, Applicants) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission an application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power
Act requesting that the Commission authorize: (i) The transfer of all
of Mesquite's membership interests in CB I and CB II to Okwari CB; (ii)
the subsequent sale and transfer of up to 51 percent of the membership
interests thus obtained by Okwari CB to as yet unidentified purchasers;
and (iii) the assignment of power purchase agreements from El Paso
Marketing to CCG. Applicants requested privileged treatment for certain
exhibits pursuant to 18 CFR 33.9 and 388.112. Applicants also requested
expedited consideration of this Application.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
2. Detroit Edison Company, DTE Energy Trading, Inc., DTE Edison
America, Inc., DTE Energy Marketing Inc., DTE Georgetown L.P., DTE
River Rouge No. 1, L.L.C. and Crete Energy Venture, L.L.C.
[Docket Nos. ER97-324-007, ER97-3834-012, ER98-3026-008, ER99-3368-004,
ER00-1746-002, ER00-1816-003 and ER02-963-004]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, The Detroit Edison Company,
DTE Energy Trading, Inc., DTE Edison America, Inc., DTE Energy
Marketing, Inc., DTE Georgetown, L.P., DTE River Rouge No. 1, L.L.C.,
and Crete Energy Venture, L.L.C. (collectively, the DTE Parties)
tendered for filing a joint market power update analysis in compliance
with the Commission's order in Acadia Power Partners, L.L.C., 107 FERC
] 61,168 (2004).
The DTE Parties state that copies of the filing were served on
parties on the official service lists in the above-captioned
proceedings.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
3. Cleo Power LLC, Cleco Marketing & Trading LLC, Cleco Evangeline LLC
and Perryville Energy Partners, LLC.
[Docket Nos. ER99-3855-003, ER99-2300-005, ER99-2928-002 and ER02-1406-
004]
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Cleco Power LLC, Cleco
Evangeline LLC, and Perryville Energy Partners, LLC submitted
generation market power screens and related analyses.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.
4. Black Hills Colorado, LLC, Black Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills
Pepperell Power Associates, Inc., Black Hills Power, Inc., Fountain
Valley Power, LLC, Harbor Cogeneration Company, LLC and Las Vegas
Cogeneration II, LLC
[Docket Nos. ER00-1952-002, ER03-802-002, ER96-1635-009, ER99-2287-002,
ER01-1784-005, ER99-1248-004 and ER03-222-004]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Black Hills Colorado, LLC,
Black Hills Wyoming, Inc., Black Hills Pepperell Power Associates,
Inc., Black Hills Power, Inc., Fountain Valley Power, LLC, Harbor
Cogeneration Company, LLC, and Las Vegas Cogeneration II, LLC, filed
with the Commission updated market power analyses.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
5. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, Arizona Public Service Company,
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation and APS Energy Services Company, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER00-2268-008, ER99-4124-006, ER00-3312-007 and ER99-4122-
009]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, the Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation (PWCC), the Arizona Public Service Company (APS), the
Pinnacle West Energy Corporation (PWEC) and APS Energy Services
Company, Inc. (APSES) (collectively, the Pinnacle West Companies),
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's order issued
December 20, 2004 in Docket No. ER00-2268-005, et al., FERC ] 61,295
(2004).
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
6. Entergy Services, Inc.,
[Docket No. ER04-35-003]
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Entergy Services, Inc., on
behalf of the Entergy Operating Companies, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.,
Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy
Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc., tendered its
compliance filing in response to the Commission's order in Entergy
Services, Inc., 109 FERC ] 61,216 (2004).
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.
7. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER04-435-006]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) tendered for filing revisions to its Wholesale
Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT), FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised
Volume No. 5, in compliance with the Commission's Order issued
September 22, 2004 in Docket Nos. ER04-435-002 and ER04-435-004, 108
FERC ] 61,301.
SCE states that copies of this filing were served on parties on the
official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
8. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. ER04-474-003]
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
(PJM) submitted a substitute interconnection service agreement among
PJM, Industrial Power Generating Corporation, and Monongahela Power
Company, The Potomac Edison Company, and West Penn Power Company, all
doing business as Allegheny Power consistent with PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C., 109 FERC ] 61,030 (2004), issued on October 7, 2004 in Docket
Nos. ER04-474-000 and ER04-474-001.
PJM states that copies of the filing were served on parties on the
official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.
9. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and Public
Utilities With Grandfathered Agreements in the Midwest ISO Region
[Docket Nos. ER04-691-014 and EL04-104-013]
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted proposed
revisions to the Midwest ISO's Open Access Transmission and Energy
Markets Tariff (EMT), FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No. 1, and
supplementary information and explanations concerning certain matters,
in order to make typographical corrections and clarifying changes to
the EMT.
The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the service requirements
set
[[Page 1430]]
forth in 18 CFR 385.2010. The Midwest ISO states it has electronically
served a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO
Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and Non-
Transmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants,
as well as all state commissions within the region. Midwest ISO further
states that in addition, the filing has been electronically posted on
the Midwest ISO's Web site at www.midwestiso.org under the heading
``Filings to FERC'' for other interested parties in this matter. The
Midwest ISO will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon
request.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.
10. CalPeak Power--Border, LLC, CalPeak Power--Enterprise, LLC and
CalPeak Power--Vaca Dixon, LLC
[Docket Nos. ER05-302-001, ER05-303-001 and ER05-304-001]
Take notice that on December 22, 2004 CalPeak Power--Border, LLC
(Border), CalPeak Power--Enterprise, LLC (Enterprise) and CalPeak
Power--Vaca Dixon, LLC (Vaca Dixon) (collectively, CalPeak Entities),
submitted for filing corrections to certain terms contained in
schedules to the reliability must-run service agreements between Border
and the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO),
Enterprise and the ISO, and Vaca Dixon and the ISO, originally filed on
December 6, 2004. CalPeak Entities request an effective date of January
1, 2005.
CalPeak Entities state that copies of the filing were served upon
the ISO, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Pacific Gas & Electric
Company, the California Public Utilities Commission and the California
Electricity Oversight Board.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2005.
11. Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC
[Docket No. ER05-364-000]
Take notice that on December 21, 2004, Michigan Electric
Transmission Company, LLC (METC) submitted an executed Cost
Reimbursement Agreement between METC and Michigan Public Power Agency,
an executed Cost Reimbursement Agreement between METC and Michigan
South Central Power Agency, and an executed Cost Reimbursement
Agreement between METC and Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 11, 2005.
12. Arroyo Energy LP
[Docket No. ER05-375-000]
Take notice that on December 21, 2004, as amended on December 23,
2004, Arroyo Energy LP (Arroyo) filed a notice of succession to notify
the Commission that, as a result of a name change, Arroyo Energy LP has
succeeded to the Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 of BS Energy LP.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
13. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER05-376-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service Agreement No.
133 under the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff, FERC Electric
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE and the Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California (MWD). The purpose of the WDAT
Service Agreement is to specify the terms and conditions under which
SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service from MWD's Small Hydro
Facilities to the California Independent System Operator Controlled
Grid.
SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California and MWD.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
14. MidAmerican Energy Company
[Docket No. ER05-377-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, MidAmerican Energy Company
(MidAmerican), filed with the Commission a Network Integration
Transmission Service Agreement and a Network Operating Agreement
between MidAmerican Energy Company and the City of Buffalo, Iowa
(Buffalo). MidAmerican requests an effective date of January 1, 2005,
for these Agreements.
MidAmerican states it has served a copy of the filing on Buffalo,
the Iowa Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission and the
South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
15. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[Docket No. ER05-378-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E) submitted its Transmission Owner Tariff for the
Transmission Access Charge Balancing Account. PG&E requests an
effective date of April 1, 2005.
PG&E states that copies of the filing were served upon the
California Public Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
16. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER05-380-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted a Letter Agreement between SCE and the Southern
California Water Company (SCWC). SCE states that the purpose of the
Letter Agreement is to provide an interim arrangement pursuant to which
SCE will commence the engineering, design and procurement of equipment
and material for, and construction of certain additional facilities, as
described in Exhibit A of the Letter Agreement, required in order for
SCWC's generation plant to operate in parallel with SCE's electric
system.
SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California and SCWC.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
17. California Independent System
[Docket No. ER05-381-000 Operator Corporation]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, the California Independent
System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing revisions to the
Transmission Control Agreement (TCA) for acceptance by the Commission.
The ISO states that the purpose of the revisions are to: (1) Identify
the transmission interests (i.e., the transmission facilities and
Entitlements) that the City of Pasadena, California (Pasadena) will be
turning over to the ISO's Operational Control, by including those
interests in a new Appendix A to the TCA, (2) identify the Encumbrances
associated with those interests, by listing the Encumbrances in a new
Appendix B to the TCA; and (3) identify the persons to contact at
Pasadena for notice purposes by expanding Appendix F to the TCA. The
ISO requests an effective date of January 1, 2005.
The ISO states that this filing has been served upon the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California; the California Energy
Commission; the California Electricity Oversight Board; Pacific Gas and
Electric Company; San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Southern California
Edison Company; the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning,
[[Page 1431]]
and Riverside, California (the Southern Cities); the City of Vernon,
California; Trans-Elect NTD Path 15, LLC; Western Area Power
Administration--Sierra Nevada Region; Pasadena; and all parties with
effective Scheduling Coordinator Agreements under the ISO Tariff. The
ISO states it has posted this filing on the ISO Home Page.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
18. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER05-382-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) submitted for filing a Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service (WDAT Service Agreement), Service Agreement No.
134 under the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff, FERC Electric
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 5, between SCE and The Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California (MWD). SCE states that the
purpose of the WDAT Service Agreement is to specify the terms and
conditions under which SCE will provide Wholesale Distribution Service
from MWD's Etiwanda Power Plant to the California Independent System
Operator Controlled Grid.
SCE states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California and MWD.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
19. Port Washington Generating Station LLC
[Docket No. ER05-383-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 2004, Port Washington Generating
Station LLC (PWGS) submitted for filing under section 205 of the
Federal Power Act, a Power Purchase Agreement providing for sales of
test power between PWGS and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. PWGS
states that the test power provides the terms and conditions pursuant
to which, prior to the commencement of commercial operations, PWGS will
sell test power from its Port Washington Unit 1 facility to Wisconsin
Electric.
PWGS states that copies of the filing were served upon the Public
Service Commission of Wisconsin.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
20. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER05-384-000]
Take notice, that on December 23, 2004, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) tendered for filing notice of cancellation of its First
Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 292 and First Revised Rate Schedule FERC
No. 318. SCE requests an effective date of January 1, 2005.
SCE states that copies of this filing were served upon the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California and the Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-27 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
