Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability, 1433-1434 [05-340]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
11. Reliant Energy Etiwanda, Inc.
[Docket No. ER05–373–000]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Reliant Energy Etiwanda. Inc.
(Etiwanda) tendered for filing a letter
agreement (Waiver Letter) setting forth
certain waivers that affect its Rate
Schedule FERC No. 2, Must-Run Service
Agreement. Etiwanda states that the
Waiver Letter waives certain provisions
of the Must-Run Service Agreement in
light of the Etiwanda’s execution of a
multi-year tolling agreement with
Southern California Edison Company to
commence January 1, 2005. Etiwanda
requests that this filing be made
effective January 1, 2005.
Etiwanda states that this filing has
been served upon the CAISO, the
California Public Utilities Commission,
the California Electricity Oversight
Board and Southern California Edison
Company.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
12. ISO New England Inc., Bangor
Hydro-Electric Company, Central
Maine Power Company, NSTAR
Electric & Gas Corporation, on Behalf of
Its Affiliates Boston Edison Company,
Commonwealth Electric Company,
Cambridge Electric Light Company, and
Canal Electric Company, New England
Power Company, Northeast Utilities
Service Company, on Behalf of Its
Operating Company Affiliates The
Connecticut Light and Power Company,
Western Massachusetts Electric
Company, Public Service Company of
New Hampshire and Holyoke Water
Power Company, The United
Illuminating Company, Fitchburg Gas
and Electric Light Company, Unitil
Energy Systems, Inc., Vermont Electric
Power Company, Central Vermont
Public Service Corporation, Green
Mountain Power Corporation, Vermont
Electric Cooperative, Florida Power &
Light Company—New England Division
[Docket No. ER05–374–000]
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO)
and Bangor Hydro-Electric Company;
Central Maine Power Company; NSTAR
Electric & Gas Corporation, on behalf of
its affiliates Boston Edison Company,
Commonwealth Electric Company,
Cambridge Electric Light Company, and
Canal Electric Company; New England
Power Company; Northeast Utilities
Service Company, on behalf of its
operating company affiliates The
Connecticut Light and Power Company,
Western Massachusetts Electric
Company, Public Service Company of
New Hampshire and Holyoke Power
and Electric Company, and Holyoke
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Water Power Company; The United
Illuminating Company; Fitchburg Gas
and Electric Light Company; Unitil
Energy Systems, Inc.; Vermont Electric
Power Company; Central Vermont
Public Service Corporation; Green
Mountain Power Corporation and
Vermont Electric Cooperative
(collectively, the ‘‘New England TOs’’)
and Florida Power & Light Company—
New England Division, (collectively
with the ISO and the New England TOs,
the ‘‘Filing Parties’’) submitted,
pursuant to section 205 of the Federal
Power Act: (1) Revisions to the
Transmission, Markets and Services
Tariff of the ISO, as the regional
transmission organization for New
England pursuant to the Filing Parties’
RTO proposal that was filed with the
Commission on October 31, 2003 and
conditionally accepted by the
Commission on March 24, 2004 and
with respect to which, inter alia, the
Commission conditionally approved a
settlement agreement on November 3,
2004; (2) revisions to the Transmission
Operating Agreement among the ISO,
the New England TOs, and other
Participating Transmission Owners; and
(3) revisions to the Rate Design and
Funds Disbursement Agreement among
the Participating Transmission Owners.
Other documents are filed for
informational purposes.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2005.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all parties to this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1433
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–29 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6659–3]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements filed December 27, 2004
through December 30, 2004 pursuant
to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 040603, Final EIS, NPS, TX, Rio
Grande Wild and Scenic River
General Management Plan,
Implementation, Big Bend National
Park, Brewster and Terrell Counties,
TX, Wait Period Ends: February 7,
2005, Contact: Mathew Safford (303)
969–2898.
EIS No. 040604, Draft EIS, UAF, NM,
New Mexico Training Initiative,
Proposal to Modify the Training
Airspace New Cannon Air Force Base
(AFB), NM, Comment Period Ends:
February 22, 2005, Contact: Brenda
Cook (505) 784–4131.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 040598, Final EIS, AFS, ID,
Caribou Sheep Allotment
Management Plan Revision, Authorize
Continue Livestock Grazing, CaribouTarghee National Forest, Palisades
Ranger District, Bonneville County,
ID, Wait Period Ends: January 31,
2005, Contact: Greg Hanson (208)
523–1412. Revision of FR Notice
Published on 12/30/2004: CEQ wait
period ending 1/30/2005 corrected to
1/31/2005.
EIS No. 040599, Final Supplement,
FTA, NY, Erie Canal Harbor Project
(formerly known as the Buffalo Inner
Harbor Development Project) Updated
Information on the Original Project,
City of Buffalo, Erie County, NY, Wait
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
1434
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2005 / Notices
Period Ends: January 31, 2005,
Contact: Irwin Kessman (212) 668–
2170. Revision of FR Notice Published
on 12/30/2004: CEQ wait period
ending 1/30/05 corrected to 1/31/
2005.
EIS No. 040601, Final EIS, NRS,
Programmatic EIS—Emergency
Watershed Protection Program,
Improvements and Expansion, To
Preserve Life and Property Threatened
by Disaster-Caused Erosion and
Flooding, U.S. 50 States and
Territories except Coastal Area, Wait
Period Ends: January 31, 2005,
Contact: Victor Cole (202) 690–4575.
Revision of FR Notice published on
12/30/2004: CEQ wait period ending
1/30/2005 corrected to 1/31/2005.
Dated: January 5, 2005.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05–340 Filed 1–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–U–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6659–4]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under Section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act, as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
(202) 564–7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned
to draft environmental impact
statements (EISs) was published in FR
dated April 02, 2004 (69 FR 17403).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D–AFS–J65421–00 Rating
EC1, Grizzly Bear Conservation for the
Greater Yellowstone Area National
Forests, Implementation, Amend Six
Forest Plans: Beaverhead-Deerlodge
National Forest, Bridger-Teton National
Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest,
Custer National Forest, Gallatin
National Forest and Shoshone National
Forest, MT, WY and ID.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns that the
preferred alternative did not include
protection measures to reduce conflicts
between grizzly bears and other Forest
uses and to enhance food security and
habitat protections included in other
alternatives. EPA believes these
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jan 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
measures would improve water quality,
fish and wildlife, and other natural
resources and should be considered in
the Final EIS.
ERP No. D–AFS–J65423–UT Rating
EC2, Reissuance of 10-Year Term
Grazing Permits to Continue Authorize
Grazing on Eight Cattle Allotments,
Permit Reissuance, Fishlake National
Forest, Beaver Mountain Tushar Range,
Millard, Piute, Garfield, Beaver and Iron
Counties, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns with potential
adverse impacts to aquatic resources,
water quality, and wildlife habitats as
well as soil erosion from continued
grazing as proposed in the Draft EIS.
The Final EIS should consider greater
use of upland areas, include specific
guidelines and measures for future
adaptive management processes and
ensure resources for education,
enforcement of permit standards,
mitigation and monitoring.
ERP No. D–AFS–J65427–WY Rating
EC2, Cottonwood II Vegetation
Management Project, Proposal to
Implement Vegetation Management in
the North and South Cottonwood Creek
Drainages, Bridger-Teton National
Forest, Big Piney Ranger District,
Sublette County, WY.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns about potential adverse
impacts to water quality, aquatic habitat
and wildlife resources, soil condition
and impacts to fish and wildlife,
especially sensitive species. In addition,
the Final EIS should include the value
of recreation and impacts to recreation
related business to assess the full range
of potential socio-economic impacts.
ERP No. D–AFS–J65429–CO Rating
EC2, Village at Wolf Creek Project,
Application for Transportation and
Utility Systems and Facilities, Proposed
Development and Use of Roads and
Utility Corridors Crossing, National
Forest System Lands to Access 287.5
Acres of Private Property Land, Mineral
County, CO.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns with potential
adverse impacts to wetlands, water
quality and quantity, aquatic habitat, air
quality and wildlife, (including lynx
and Rio Grande Cut Throat Trout). The
Final EIS should include an analysis
and quantification of indirect impacts,
including impacts from reasonably
foreseeable actions and mitigation
measures.
ERP No. D–AFS–J65430–MT Rating
EC2, McSutten Decision Area,
Implementation of Harvest and
Associated Activities, Prescribed
Burning, and Road Management,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Kootenai National Forest, Rexford
Ranger District, Lincoln County, MT.
Summary: EPA supports the project
purpose and need, but expressed
environmental concerns regarding
proposed timber harvests on sensitive
soils and potential water quality
impacts.
ERP No. DS–AFS–J02027–UT Rating
EC2, Table Top Exploratory Oil and Gas
Wells, New Information from the
Approval 1994 Final EIS, WasatchCache National Forest, Evanston Ranger
District, Summit County, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
about the lack of detail given in the
mitigation plans to protect the lynx. The
Final EIS should include mitigation
measures to reduce potential adverse air
impacts from flaring during periods
with atmospheric inversions.
Final EISs
ERP No. F–AFS–H65021–MO East
Fredericktown Project, To Restore
Shortleaf Pine, Improve Forest Health,
Treat Affected Stands and Recover
Valuable Timber Products, Mark Twain
National Forest, Potosi/Fredericktown
Ranger District, Bollinger, Madison, St.
Francois and Ste. Genevieve Counties,
MO.
Summary: The Final EIS adequately
addressed EPA’s issues raised in the
comments on the Draft EIS.
ERP No. F–AFS–J65415–MT RobertWedge Post-Fire Project, Salvage Trees
and Rehabilitate Lands, Flathead
National Forest, Glacier View Ranger
District, Flathead County, MT.
Summary: EPA is concerned that
logging in areas of high burn severity
may result in detrimental soil and water
quality effects, and increased erosion
and sediment production and supports
the use of less damaging logging
techniques. EPA also expressed
environmental concerns regarding road
management activities.
ERP No. F–AFS–J65420–SD Southeast
Geographic Area Rangeland
Management on National Forest System
Lands of the Buffalo Gap National
Grassland, To Implement Best
Management Grazing Practices, Buffalo
Gap National Grassland, Falls River
Ranger District, Fall River County, SD.
Summary: EPA’s main concerns relate
to continuing adverse impacts from
livestock grazing to: (1) Streams,
riparian zones, and wetlands; (2) fecal
coliform and other bacteria, sediment,
and other impacts that are impairing
beneficial uses for warmwater fish and
other aquatic life; and (3) the need for
better riparian protections to manage
livestock activities that cause adverse
impacts to fish and other aquatic life
and their habitats.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1433-1434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-340]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6659-3]
Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information (202) 564-7167 or https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements filed December 27,
2004 through December 30, 2004 pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 040603, Final EIS, NPS, TX, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River
General Management Plan, Implementation, Big Bend National Park,
Brewster and Terrell Counties, TX, Wait Period Ends: February 7, 2005,
Contact: Mathew Safford (303) 969-2898.
EIS No. 040604, Draft EIS, UAF, NM, New Mexico Training Initiative,
Proposal to Modify the Training Airspace New Cannon Air Force Base
(AFB), NM, Comment Period Ends: February 22, 2005, Contact: Brenda Cook
(505) 784-4131.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 040598, Final EIS, AFS, ID, Caribou Sheep Allotment Management
Plan Revision, Authorize Continue Livestock Grazing, Caribou-Targhee
National Forest, Palisades Ranger District, Bonneville County, ID, Wait
Period Ends: January 31, 2005, Contact: Greg Hanson (208) 523-1412.
Revision of FR Notice Published on 12/30/2004: CEQ wait period ending
1/30/2005 corrected to 1/31/2005.
EIS No. 040599, Final Supplement, FTA, NY, Erie Canal Harbor Project
(formerly known as the Buffalo Inner Harbor Development Project)
Updated Information on the Original Project, City of Buffalo, Erie
County, NY, Wait
[[Page 1434]]
Period Ends: January 31, 2005, Contact: Irwin Kessman (212) 668-2170.
Revision of FR Notice Published on 12/30/2004: CEQ wait period ending
1/30/05 corrected to 1/31/2005.
EIS No. 040601, Final EIS, NRS, Programmatic EIS--Emergency Watershed
Protection Program, Improvements and Expansion, To Preserve Life and
Property Threatened by Disaster-Caused Erosion and Flooding, U.S. 50
States and Territories except Coastal Area, Wait Period Ends: January
31, 2005, Contact: Victor Cole (202) 690-4575. Revision of FR Notice
published on 12/30/2004: CEQ wait period ending 1/30/2005 corrected to
1/31/2005.
Dated: January 5, 2005.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05-340 Filed 1-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-U-P