Lower Granite Area Mining Projects; Umatilla National Forest, Grant County, OR, 1221 [05-273]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2005 / Notices
Gallatin National Forest. Reviewers may
wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in structuring
comments.
I am the responsible official and the
deciding officer for the North Bridgers
Grazing Allotment Management Plan
Update. My address is District Ranger,
Bozeman Ranger District, 3710 Fallon
Street Suite C, Bozeman, MT 59718.
Dated: December 8, 2004.
´
Jose Castro
District Ranger
[FR Doc. 05–280 Filed 1–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Lower Granite Area Mining Projects;
Umatilla National Forest, Grant County,
OR
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare a
supplemental environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service published
a document in the Federal Register on
March 9, 2000, providing notice that the
Umatilla National Forest was intending
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) on a proposed action to
approve Proposed Plans of Operation on
mining claims located in the Granite
Area, within the Granite Creek
Watershed, a tributary of the North Fork
John Day River. The project area is
located on the North Fork John Day
Ranger District, approximately 35 air
miles southeast of Ukiah, Oregon. The
notice of availability for the Draft EIS for
this project was published in the
Federal Register on July 26, 2002. The
decision has been made to issue a
supplemental EIS for this project. The
supplemental draft EIS will include on
additional Plan of Operation and will
update the analysis; including the
cumulative effects analysis.
DATES: The formal scoping period
opened with publication of the original
Notice of Intent to produce an EIS first
appeared in the Federal Register on
March 9, 2000. Notification of the Draft
EIS was printed in the Federal Register
on July 26, 2002. The comment period
was extended to October 21, 2002 in an
amended notice published in the
Federal Register September 20, 2002.
Comments regarding the draft EIS
should have been received by October
21, 2002. The Forest Service expects to
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:45 Jan 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
file the supplemental draft impact
statement with the Environmental
Protection Agency and make it available
for public comment by February 2005
and the final environmental impact
statement is expected May 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments and
suggestions to: District Ranger, North
Fork John Day Ranger District, P.O. Box
158, Ukiah, OR 97880.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ralph Hartman, Project Team Leader,
North Fork John Day Ranger District.
Phone: (541) 427–5336.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
formal scoping period opened with
publication of the Notice of Intent to
produce an EIS, which first appeared in
the Federal Register on March 9, 2000
(Vol. 65, No. 47, pages 12503–12505).
Notification of the draft EIS was printed
in the Federal Register on July 26, 2002
(Vol. 67, No. 144, page 48895). The
comment period was extended to
October 21, 2002 in an Amended Notice
published in the Federal Register on
September 20, 2002 (Vol. 67, No. 183,
page 59285). Since publication of the
draft EIS several changes have occurred.
First, one additional new mining
proposal has been received within the
analysis area and will be added to the
proposed action. The name of the EIS
has been changed from Granite Area
Mining Projects to Lower Granite Area
Mining Projects; and in response to
comments received during the draft EIS
comment period, a more detailed
cumulative effects analysis will be
completed. In response to the proposed
changes, the decision has been made to
issue a supplemental draft EIS. The
scope of the project has not changed;
therefore, this revised Notice of Intent
does not initiate a second scoping
period for the proposal. The
supplemental draft EIS is expected to be
released in February 2005 and the final
EIS is expected to be released in May
2005.
Responsible Official: The responsible
official for this EIS is Craig Smith
Dixon, District Ranger, North Fork John
Day Ranger District, Umatilla National
Forest.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A supplemental
draft EIS will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the
supplemental draft EIS will be 45 days
from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency published the notice
of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1221
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDS, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). also
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft EIS stage but that are
not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: December 22, 2004.
Jeff D. Blackwood,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–273 Filed 1–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast Province
Advisory Committee will meet in
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 1221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-273]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Lower Granite Area Mining Projects; Umatilla National Forest,
Grant County, OR
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact
statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a document in the Federal
Register on March 9, 2000, providing notice that the Umatilla National
Forest was intending to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on a proposed action to approve Proposed Plans of Operation on mining
claims located in the Granite Area, within the Granite Creek Watershed,
a tributary of the North Fork John Day River. The project area is
located on the North Fork John Day Ranger District, approximately 35
air miles southeast of Ukiah, Oregon. The notice of availability for
the Draft EIS for this project was published in the Federal Register on
July 26, 2002. The decision has been made to issue a supplemental EIS
for this project. The supplemental draft EIS will include on additional
Plan of Operation and will update the analysis; including the
cumulative effects analysis.
DATES: The formal scoping period opened with publication of the
original Notice of Intent to produce an EIS first appeared in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2000. Notification of the Draft EIS was
printed in the Federal Register on July 26, 2002. The comment period
was extended to October 21, 2002 in an amended notice published in the
Federal Register September 20, 2002. Comments regarding the draft EIS
should have been received by October 21, 2002. The Forest Service
expects to file the supplemental draft impact statement with the
Environmental Protection Agency and make it available for public
comment by February 2005 and the final environmental impact statement
is expected May 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments and suggestions to: District Ranger,
North Fork John Day Ranger District, P.O. Box 158, Ukiah, OR 97880.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph Hartman, Project Team Leader,
North Fork John Day Ranger District. Phone: (541) 427-5336.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The formal scoping period opened with
publication of the Notice of Intent to produce an EIS, which first
appeared in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000 (Vol. 65, No. 47,
pages 12503-12505). Notification of the draft EIS was printed in the
Federal Register on July 26, 2002 (Vol. 67, No. 144, page 48895). The
comment period was extended to October 21, 2002 in an Amended Notice
published in the Federal Register on September 20, 2002 (Vol. 67, No.
183, page 59285). Since publication of the draft EIS several changes
have occurred. First, one additional new mining proposal has been
received within the analysis area and will be added to the proposed
action. The name of the EIS has been changed from Granite Area Mining
Projects to Lower Granite Area Mining Projects; and in response to
comments received during the draft EIS comment period, a more detailed
cumulative effects analysis will be completed. In response to the
proposed changes, the decision has been made to issue a supplemental
draft EIS. The scope of the project has not changed; therefore, this
revised Notice of Intent does not initiate a second scoping period for
the proposal. The supplemental draft EIS is expected to be released in
February 2005 and the final EIS is expected to be released in May 2005.
Responsible Official: The responsible official for this EIS is
Craig Smith Dixon, District Ranger, North Fork John Day Ranger
District, Umatilla National Forest.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A supplemental draft EIS will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the supplemental draft EIS will be 45
days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency published the
notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDS, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). also environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338
(E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close
of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: December 22, 2004.
Jeff D. Blackwood,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-273 Filed 1-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P