Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion To Vacate Certificate In Part, 801 [E4-3935]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices
process. Environmental commentors
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commentors will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission may issue a
preliminary determination on nonenvironmental issues prior to the
completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project.
This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the
need for the project and its economic
effect on existing customers of the
applicant, on other pipelines in the area,
and on landowners and communities.
For example, the Commission considers
the extent to which the applicant may
need to exercise eminent domain to
obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the
non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a
person has comments on community
and landowner impacts from this
proposal, it is important either to file
comments or to intervene as early in the
process as possible.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3934 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP99–163–003]
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company; Notice of Motion To Vacate
Certificate In Part
December 29, 2004.
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company (Questar Southern Trails), 180
East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111, filed in Docket No. CP99–163–
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:49 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
003 a motion to vacate the certificate
authority granted in 2000, to acquire,
convert and construct facilities
necessary to operate 209 miles of the
West Zone portion of the Southern
Trails pipeline project from Essex,
California to its termination at Long
Beach, California. Questar Southern
Trails explains that it no longer intends
to activate the 209-mile segment.
Questar Southern Trails further explains
that following receipt of abandonment
authority requested in related Docket
No. CP05–39–000, it intends to sell the
entire West Zone of the Southern Trails
pipeline from North Needles to Long
Beach, California. Questar Southern
Trails maintains that its decision to sell
the West Zone of its pipeline will not
alter the operation of or service
provided through the East Zone of its
pipeline from Blanco, New Mexico to
North Needles, California, all as more
fully set forth in the motion which is on
file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. The filing may also
be viewed on the Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, call (202) 502–3676, or TTY,
(202) 502–8659.
Any questions regarding this motion
should be directed to Tad M. Taylor,
Senior Corporate Counsel, Questar
Pipeline Company, 180 East 100 South,
P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah
84145–0360, Phone: (801) 324–5531
tad.taylor@questar.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A
person obtaining party status will be
placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and
will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies
of filings made with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project, or in support of or in opposition
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
801
to this project, should submit an
original and two copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental
commentors will be placed on the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the
Commission’s environmental review
process. Environmental commentors
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commentors will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission may issue a
preliminary determination on nonenvironmental issues prior to the
completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project.
This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the
need for the project and its economic
effect on existing customers of the
applicant, on other pipelines in the area,
and on landowners and communities.
For example, the Commission considers
the extent to which the applicant may
need to exercise eminent domain to
obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the
non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a
person has comments on community
and landowner impacts from this
proposal, it is important either to file
comments or to intervene as early in the
process as possible.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3935 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E4-3935]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP99-163-003]
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion To
Vacate Certificate In Part
December 29, 2004.
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Questar Southern Trails
Pipeline Company (Questar Southern Trails), 180 East 100 South, Salt
Lake City, Utah 84111, filed in Docket No. CP99-163-003 a motion to
vacate the certificate authority granted in 2000, to acquire, convert
and construct facilities necessary to operate 209 miles of the West
Zone portion of the Southern Trails pipeline project from Essex,
California to its termination at Long Beach, California. Questar
Southern Trails explains that it no longer intends to activate the 209-
mile segment. Questar Southern Trails further explains that following
receipt of abandonment authority requested in related Docket No. CP05-
39-000, it intends to sell the entire West Zone of the Southern Trails
pipeline from North Needles to Long Beach, California. Questar Southern
Trails maintains that its decision to sell the West Zone of its
pipeline will not alter the operation of or service provided through
the East Zone of its pipeline from Blanco, New Mexico to North Needles,
California, all as more fully set forth in the motion which is on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also
be viewed on the Web at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call (202)
502-3676, or TTY, (202) 502-8659.
Any questions regarding this motion should be directed to Tad M.
Taylor, Senior Corporate Counsel, Questar Pipeline Company, 180 East
100 South, P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0360, Phone:
(801) 324-5531 tad.taylor@questar.com.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project, or in support of or in opposition to this project, should
submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of
the Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the
Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated
with the Commission's environmental review process. Environmental
commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on
all other parties. The Commission's rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests
only to the applicant. However, the non-party commentors will not
receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by
the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the
Commission's final order.
The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its
economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other
pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example,
the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to
exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on
community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important
either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as
possible.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (https://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4-3935 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
