Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company; Notice of Application, 800-801 [E4-3934]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
800
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices
or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone
filing an intervention or protest on or
before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3940 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL05–2–000]
Public Service Company of New
Mexico; Notice of Initiation of
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date
December 21, 2004.
On December 20, 2004, the
Commission issued an order in the
above-docketed proceeding. The
Commission’s order institutes a
proceeding in Docket No. EL05–2–000
under section 206 of the Federal Power
Act with respect to the justness and
reasonableness of Public Service
Company of New Mexico’s marketbased rates.
The refund effective date in Docket
No. EL05–2–000, established pursuant
to section 206(b) of the Federal Power
Act will be 60 days following
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL05–3–000]
Kansas City Power and Light Company
and Great Plains Power, Inc.; Notice of
Initiation of Proceeding and Refund
Effective Date
December 28, 2004.
On December 17, 2004, the
Commission issued an order in Docket
Nos. ER99–1005–001, 002 and 003, and
ER02–725–003 and 004. The
Commission’s order institutes a
proceeding in Docket No. EL05–3–000
under section 206 of the Federal Power
Act with respect to the justness and
reasonableness of Kansas City Power
and Light Company’s market-based
rates.
The refund effective date in Docket
No. EL05–3–000, established pursuant
to section 206(b) of the Federal Power
Act will be 60 days following
17:49 Jan 04, 2005
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3928 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3929 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Jkt 205001
[Docket No. CP05–39–000]
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company; Notice of Application
December 29, 2004.
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company (Questar Southern Trails), 180
East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111, filed in Docket No. CP05–39–000
an application pursuant to section 7(b)
of the Natural Gas Act for authorization
to abandon, by sale, a 36-mile, 16-inch
diameter portion of the West Zone of the
Southern Trails pipeline, including the
associated Essex delivery point to
Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E),
located in San Bernardino County,
California. Questar Southern Trails
explains that the abandonment is
necessary in order to provide assurance
to a potential buyer that it may proceed
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to enter into a purchase agreement for
the transfer of all West Zone assets as
facilities removed from the
Commission’s jurisdiction. Questar
Southern Trails further explains that the
abandonment proposal will not affect
transportation service provided through
the Southern Trails pipeline to existing
firm shippers since the Essex delivery
point to PG&E has only been available
to shippers on a day-by-day basis as a
temporary, secondary delivery point, all
as more fully set forth in the application
which is on file with the Commission
and open to public inspection. The
filing may also be viewed on the Web
at https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, call (202)
502–3676, or TTY, (202) 502–8659.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
Lenard G. Wright, Director, Federal
Regulation, Questar Pipeline Company,
180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45360,
Salt Lake City, Utah 84145–0360,
phone: (801) 324–2459, fax: (801) 324–
5485 or lenard.wright@questar.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A
person obtaining party status will be
placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and
will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies
of filings made with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project, or in support of or in opposition
to this project, should submit an
original and two copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental
commentors will be placed on the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the
Commission’s environmental review
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Notices
process. Environmental commentors
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commentors will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission may issue a
preliminary determination on nonenvironmental issues prior to the
completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project.
This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the
need for the project and its economic
effect on existing customers of the
applicant, on other pipelines in the area,
and on landowners and communities.
For example, the Commission considers
the extent to which the applicant may
need to exercise eminent domain to
obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the
non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a
person has comments on community
and landowner impacts from this
proposal, it is important either to file
comments or to intervene as early in the
process as possible.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3934 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP99–163–003]
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company; Notice of Motion To Vacate
Certificate In Part
December 29, 2004.
Take notice that on December 22,
2004, Questar Southern Trails Pipeline
Company (Questar Southern Trails), 180
East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111, filed in Docket No. CP99–163–
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:49 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
003 a motion to vacate the certificate
authority granted in 2000, to acquire,
convert and construct facilities
necessary to operate 209 miles of the
West Zone portion of the Southern
Trails pipeline project from Essex,
California to its termination at Long
Beach, California. Questar Southern
Trails explains that it no longer intends
to activate the 209-mile segment.
Questar Southern Trails further explains
that following receipt of abandonment
authority requested in related Docket
No. CP05–39–000, it intends to sell the
entire West Zone of the Southern Trails
pipeline from North Needles to Long
Beach, California. Questar Southern
Trails maintains that its decision to sell
the West Zone of its pipeline will not
alter the operation of or service
provided through the East Zone of its
pipeline from Blanco, New Mexico to
North Needles, California, all as more
fully set forth in the motion which is on
file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. The filing may also
be viewed on the Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, call (202) 502–3676, or TTY,
(202) 502–8659.
Any questions regarding this motion
should be directed to Tad M. Taylor,
Senior Corporate Counsel, Questar
Pipeline Company, 180 East 100 South,
P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah
84145–0360, Phone: (801) 324–5531
tad.taylor@questar.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A
person obtaining party status will be
placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and
will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other
parties. A party must submit 14 copies
of filings made with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project, or in support of or in opposition
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
801
to this project, should submit an
original and two copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental
commentors will be placed on the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the
Commission’s environmental review
process. Environmental commentors
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commentors will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission may issue a
preliminary determination on nonenvironmental issues prior to the
completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project.
This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the
need for the project and its economic
effect on existing customers of the
applicant, on other pipelines in the area,
and on landowners and communities.
For example, the Commission considers
the extent to which the applicant may
need to exercise eminent domain to
obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the
non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a
person has comments on community
and landowner impacts from this
proposal, it is important either to file
comments or to intervene as early in the
process as possible.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4–3935 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 800-801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E4-3934]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP05-39-000]
Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company; Notice of Application
December 29, 2004.
Take notice that on December 22, 2004, Questar Southern Trails
Pipeline Company (Questar Southern Trails), 180 East 100 South, Salt
Lake City, Utah 84111, filed in Docket No. CP05-39-000 an application
pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for authorization to
abandon, by sale, a 36-mile, 16-inch diameter portion of the West Zone
of the Southern Trails pipeline, including the associated Essex
delivery point to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), located in San
Bernardino County, California. Questar Southern Trails explains that
the abandonment is necessary in order to provide assurance to a
potential buyer that it may proceed to enter into a purchase agreement
for the transfer of all West Zone assets as facilities removed from the
Commission's jurisdiction. Questar Southern Trails further explains
that the abandonment proposal will not affect transportation service
provided through the Southern Trails pipeline to existing firm shippers
since the Essex delivery point to PG&E has only been available to
shippers on a day-by-day basis as a temporary, secondary delivery
point, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also
be viewed on the Web at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call (202)
502-3676, or TTY, (202) 502-8659.
Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Lenard G. Wright, Director, Federal Regulation, Questar Pipeline
Company, 180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45360, Salt Lake City, Utah
84145-0360, phone: (801) 324-2459, fax: (801) 324-5485 or
lenard.wright@questar.com.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project, or in support of or in opposition to this project, should
submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of
the Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the
Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated
with the Commission's environmental review
[[Page 801]]
process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies
of filed documents on all other parties. The Commission's rules require
that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide
copies of their protests only to the applicant. However, the non-party
commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the
right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its
economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other
pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example,
the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to
exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed
project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be
provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on
community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important
either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as
possible.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (https://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
Comment Date: January 19, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E4-3934 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
