Flat Rate Supplemental Wage Withholding, 767-773 [05-71]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
occurs in the case of a disposition of the
stock or securities in the transferee (or
the transferee’s parent in the case of a
triangular reorganization described in
section 368(a)(1)(C) or a reorganization
described in sections 368(a)(1)(A) and
(a)(2)(D) or (E)). Where this paragraph
(c)(6)(i) applies, the transferor’s branch
profits tax liability for the taxable year
in which the section 381(a) transaction
occurs shall be determined under
§ 1.884–1, taking into account all the
adjustments in U.S. net equity that
result from the transfer of U.S. assets
and liabilities to the transferee pursuant
to the section 381(a) transaction,
without regard to any provisions in this
paragraph (c). If an event described in
paragraph (c)(6)(i)(A), (B), or (C) of this
section occurs after the close of the
taxable year in which the section 381(a)
transaction occurs, and if additional
branch profits tax is required to be paid
by reason of the application of this
paragraph (c)(6)(i), then interest must be
paid on that amount at the
underpayment rates determined under
section 6621(a)(2), with respect to the
period between the date that was
prescribed for filing the transferor’s
income tax return for the year in which
the section 381(a) transaction occurs
and the date on which the additional tax
for that year is paid. Any such
additional tax liability together with
interest thereon shall be the liability of
the transferee within the meaning of
section 6901 pursuant to section 6901
and the regulations thereunder.
(c)(6)(ii) through (f) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see § 1.884–2T(c)(6)(ii)
through (f).
(g) * * * Paragraphs (c)(6)(i)(B), (C),
and (D), are applicable for tax years
beginning after December 31, 1986,
except that such paragraphs are
applicable to transactions occurring
after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register in the case of
reorganizations described in sections
368(a)(1)(A) and 368(a)(2)(D) or (E).
Par. 12. In § 1.884–2T, paragraphs
(c)(6)(i)(B), (C), and (D) are revised to
read as follows:
§ 1.884–2T Special rules for termination or
incorporation of a U.S. trade or business or
liquidation or reorganization of a foreign
corporation or its domestic subsidiary
(Temporary).
*
*
(c) * *
(6) * *
(i) * *
*
*
*
*
VerDate jul<14>2003
*
*
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
(B), (C), and (D) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see § 1.884–
2(c)(6)(i)(B), (C), and (D).
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–201 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
767
DC 20044. Submission may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–152945–04),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC or sent
electronically, via the IRS Internet site
at https://www.irs.gov/regs or via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG–
152945–04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations, A.
G. Kelley, (202) 622–6040; concerning
submission of comments, Treena
Garrett, (202) 622–3401 (not toll-free
numbers).
26 CFR Part 31
[REG–152945–04]
RIN 1545–BD96
Flat Rate Supplemental Wage
Withholding
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Employment Tax Regulations
distinguish between regular wages paid
for a payroll period and supplemental
wages for purposes of income tax
withholding. Although the regulations
do not give a comprehensive definition
of the term ‘‘supplemental wages,’’ the
regulations provide that supplemental
wages include ‘‘* * * bonuses,
commissions, and overtime pay, paid
for the same or a different period, or
without regard to a particular period.’’
Regulations and revenue rulings have
provided other examples. See
§ 31.3401(a)–1(b)(8)(i)(b)(2) of the
regulations (sick pay paid by an agent of
the employer); § 31.3401(a)–4(c) of the
regulations (wages paid under
reimbursement and other expense
allowance arrangements); Rev. Rul. 67–
257)1967–2 C.B. 359) (income
recognized on exercise of nonqualified
stock option); Rev. Rul. 67–131 (1967–
1 C.B. 291) (lump sum payment of
accumulated annual leave); and Rev.
Rul. 66–294 (1966–2 C.B. 459) (lump
sum vacation payment, overtime pay,
lump sum retroactive pay, sick pay paid
separately from regular pay).
Section 31.3402(g)–1 of the
regulations provides the current rules
for withholding income tax from a
payment of supplemental wages. Two
procedures have been generally
available to the employer with respect
to such supplemental wage payments.
Under the first procedure (the aggregate
procedure), employers calculate the
amount of withholding due by
aggregating the amount of supplemental
wages with the regular wages paid for
the current payroll period or for the
most recent payroll period this year, and
treating the aggregate as if it were a
single wage payment for the regular
payroll period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations amending the
regulations that provide for the flat rate
of withholding applicable to calculating
the amount of income tax withholding
on supplemental wages. The proposed
amendment to the regulations reflects
changes in the law made by the Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1993, the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001, the Jobs and
Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2003, and the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004. Under the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, the optional flat
rate for withholding on supplemental
wages will generally remain at 25
percent for payments made after
December 31, 2004, but may change if
income tax rates change. However, the
2004 Act also provides that, after 2004,
if an employee receives supplemental
wages in excess of one million dollars
from an employer in a calendar year, the
excess of the supplemental wages over
one million dollars is subject to
mandatory income tax withholding at
the highest income tax rate. The highest
income tax rate is currently 35 percent.
In determining whether an employer
has reached the one million dollar
threshold for an employee,
supplemental wage payments from all
businesses under common control and
from agents will be taken into account.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by April 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–152945–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Background
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
768
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The second procedure for
withholding on supplemental wages
(the flat rate procedure) allows
employers to disregard the amount of
regular wages paid to an employee as
well as the allowances claimed by an
employee on Form W–4, ‘‘Employee’s
Withholding Allowance Certificate,’’
and use a flat percentage rate specified
in the regulations in calculating the
amount of withholding. This second
procedure of withholding on
supplemental wages is generally
available only if (1) the employer has
withheld income tax from regular wages
paid the employee, and (2) the
supplemental wages are either (a) not
paid concurrently with regular wages or
(b) separately stated on the payroll
records of the employer. See Rev. Rul.
82–200 (1982–2 C.B. 239). Under the
current regulations, if the supplemental
wage payment satisfies the conditions
necessary for use of the flat rate, the
decision whether to use the flat rate
rather than the aggregate procedure is
discretionary with the employer.
Section 31.3042(g)–1(a)(2), last modified
in 1966, states that, for wages paid after
April 30, 1966, the flat percentage rate
on supplemental wages is 20 percent.
Later statutory changes have changed
the applicable rate and the regulation is
being amended to reflect those changes.
Section 13273 of Public Law 103–66
(the Revenue Reconciliation Act of
1993; 107 Stat. 542) provides that the
rate under section 31.3402(g)–1 ‘‘shall
not be less than 28 percent.’’ This
change was effective for payments made
after December 31, 1993., The
Conference Report in connection with
this change states that the provision
‘‘increases the applicable withholding
rate on supplemental wage payments to
28 percent.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 103–111,
103d Cong., 1st Sess. 701 (1993).
Section 101(c)(11) of Public Law 107–
16 (the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001; 115 Stat. 44)
amended section 13273 of the Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1993 by striking
‘‘28 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘the third
lowest rate of tax applicable under
section 1(c) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986.’’ Section 101(d)(2) of
Public Law 107–16 provides that the
change made by section 101(c)(11) shall
apply to ‘‘amounts paid after the 60th
day after the date of enactment of this
Act.’’ Public Law 107–16 was enacted
into law on June 7, 2001. The third
lowest rate of tax applicable under
section 1(c) for purposes of section
13273 of the Revenue Reconciliation
Act of 1993 was 27.5 percent.
Consequently, the withholding rate for
supplemental wages paid after August 6,
2001, and on or before December 31,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
2001, was 27.5 percent. For 2002 the
third lowest rate of tax applicable under
section 1(c) was 27 percent. As a result
of the enactment of the Jobs and Growth
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
(Public Law 108–27) on May 28, 2003,
the third lowest rate of tax applicable
under section 1(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) for 2003 and 2004
is 25 percent.
Section 904(a) of Public Law 108–357,
118 Stat. 1418 (the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004) provides that,
generally, for payments after December
31, 2004, the flat rate for withholding on
supplemental wage rate ‘‘shall not be
less than 28 percent (or the
corresponding rate in effect under
section 1(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 for taxable years beginning
in the calendar year in which the
payment is made).’’ For 2005, the
corresponding rate in effect under
section 1(i)(2) is 25 percent.
Section 904(b) of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 also established a
mandatory flat rate of withholding on
supplemental wages to the extent that
the employee’s total supplemental
wages paid by the employer exceed one
million dollars during the calendar year.
Section 904(b) provides that
‘‘[n]otwithstanding subsection (a), if the
supplemental wage payment, when
added to all such payments previously
made by the employer to the employee
during the calendar year, exceeds
$1,000,000, the rate used with respect to
such excess shall be equal to the
maximum rate of tax in effect under
section 1 of such Code for such taxable
years beginning in such calendar year.’’
The maximum rate of tax in effect under
section 1 of the Code is currently 35
percent. Section 904(b)(2) also provides
that all persons treated as a single
employer under subsection (a) or (b) of
section 52 of the Code shall be treated
as a single employer for purposes of this
provision. This new mandatory
withholding on supplemental wages in
excess of one million dollars is effective
with respect to payments made after
December 31, 2004.
This provision is described in the
Conference Report as follows: ‘‘Under
the Senate amendment, once annual
supplemental wage payments to an
employee exceed $1 million, any
additional supplemental wage payments
to the employee in that year are subject
to withholding at the highest income tax
rate (35 percent for 2004 and 2005),
regardless of any other withholding
rules and regardless of the employee’s
Form W–4.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 108–475 at
785–6 (2004).
This provision for withholding on
supplemental wages in excess of one
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
million dollars was originally included
as part of S. 2424, 108th Cong., 2d Sess.
(2004). The legislative history in
connection with S. 2424 provided as
follows with respect to the reasons for
change: ‘‘The Committee believes that
because most employees who receive
annual supplemental wage payments in
excess of $1 million will ultimately be
taxed at the highest rate, it is
appropriate to raise the withholding rate
on such payments so that withholding
more closely approximates the ultimate
tax liability with respect to these
payments.’’ S. Rep. No. 108–266 at 105
(2004).
In a conforming amendment, the 2004
Act repealed section 13273 of the
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations change the
optional flat rate of withholding on
supplemental wages to provide that the
20 percent rate applies only to
supplemental wages paid prior to
January 1, 1994. The rate of 28 percent
applies to supplemental wages paid
after December 31, 1993, and on or
before August 6, 2001. The Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1993, as amended
by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2003, provides
that the supplemental withholding rate
shall not be less than the third lowest
rate of tax applicable under section 1(c)
for wages paid after August 6, 2001, and
before January 1, 2005. Consistent with
this amendment, the regulations provide
that the rate of 27.5 percent applies to
supplemental wages paid after August 6,
2001, and on or before December 31,
2001, the rate of 27 percent applies to
wages paid after December 31, 2001,
and on or before May 27, 2003, and the
rate of 25 percent applies to wages paid
after May 27, 2003, and on or before,
December 31, 2004. Although the Jobs
and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2003 provided that the third
lowest rate of tax under section 1(c)
after December 31, 2002, would be 25
percent, this provision was not enacted
into law until May 28, 2003. Thus, at
the time of payments of supplemental
wages made after December 31, 2002,
and prior to May 28, 2003, the third
lowest rate of tax under section 1(c) was
27 percent. This provision is consistent
with the general principle that the
employment taxation of wage payments
is determined based on the rates in
effect at the date the wages are paid.
United States v. Cleveland Indians
Baseball Co., 532 U.S. 200 (2001).
To track the statutory language of the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the
regulation provides that, for wages paid
after December 31, 2004, the flat rate for
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
supplemental wages is generally 28
percent (or the corresponding rate in
effect under section 1(i)(2) * * * for
taxable years beginning in the calendar
year in which the payment is made).
Under current law, the corresponding
rate in effect under section 1(i)(2) for
taxable years beginning in 2005 is 25
percent. Thus, for 2005, the optional flat
rate for supplemental wages under $1
million in a given taxable year is 25
percent. The optional flat rate will
remain at 25 percent until income tax
rates change.1 However, as described
below, a higher mandatory rate applies
for withholding on supplemental wages
in excess of one million dollars.
The regulation provides that if a
supplemental wage payment, together
with all other supplemental wage
payments paid by an employer to an
employee during the calendar year,
exceeds one million dollars, the
withholding rate on the supplemental
wages in excess of one million dollars
shall be equal to the maximum rate of
tax in effect under section 1 for taxable
years beginning in such calendar year.
Under current law, the maximum rate of
tax in effect for taxable years beginning
in 2005 is 35 percent. Thus, in 2005, the
mandatory flat rate for supplemental
wages in excess of $1 million in a given
taxable year is 35 percent. The
mandatory rate will remain at 35
percent until income tax rates change.2
These proposed regulations also
clarify which wages are classified as
supplemental wages. Under the
proposed regulations, supplemental
wages include any payment of wages by
an employer that is not regular wages.
Regular wages are defined as amounts
paid by an employer for a payroll period
either at a regular hourly rate or in a
predetermined fixed amount. Wages
that vary from payroll period to payroll
period based on factors other than the
amount of time worked, such as
commissions, tips, and bonuses, are
supplemental wages if they are paid in
addition to regular wages. See Rev. Rul.
82–46 (1982–1 C.B. 158). However, if an
employee receive only one type of
compensation from an employer, that
type of compensation will be regular
1 Under current law, section 1(i)(2) will not be
applicable to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2010, pursuant to the sunset
provisions contained in section 901 of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–16; 115 Stat. 150). See
also section 107 of Public Law 108–27 (117 Stat.
755). Absent legislative action, the optional flat rate
will change to 28 percent in 2011.
2 Under the sunset provision in section 901 of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001, the mandatory flat rate will change to
39.6 percent for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2010.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
wages even if the type of compensation
is something that would normally be
classified as supplemental wages. For
example, if an employee receives only
stock options as compensation from the
employer and receives no other wages
(including no includible fringe benefits
that are wages), then the income on the
exercise of the options would generally
be regular wages, rather than
supplemental wages.
The definitions of supplemental
wages and regular wages were
developed based on the historical usage
of the term in regulations and revenue
rulings. Examples are included in the
regulations to illustrate the application
of the definitions to specific scenarios.
The IRS welcomes comments on
whether this definition of supplemental
wages is appropriate.
When determining whether payments
are regular wages or supplemental
wages, and furthermore, whether the
supplemental wages paid by an
employer to an employee in a given
taxable year exceed $1 million, an
employer (the first employer) must
consider wage payments made to the
employee by any other person treated as
a single employer with the first
employer under section 52(a) or 52(b).
Furthermore, if an employer enlists a
third party to make a payment to an
employee on the employer’s behalf, the
payment will be considered as made by
the employer even though it may have
been delivered to the employee by the
third party.
The new mandatory withholding rate
on supplemental wages can apply to a
full payment or only a portion of a
payment. The maximum rate
withholding applies only to the excess
of supplemental wages over one million
dollars received by an employee from an
employer, taking into consideration all
payments of supplemental wages made
by an employer to an employee. All
payments of supplemental wages are
considered in determining this
threshold regardless of whether the
payments were subjected to flat rate
withholding. The amount of regular
wages paid to the employee has no
relevance in determining whether the
new mandatory withholding rate
applies. Also, if a payment to an
employee from an employer is not
‘‘wages’’ as defined under section
3401(a), such payment has no effect on
whether the million dollar threshold for
mandatory flat rate withholding has
been reached.
If a particular supplemental wage
payment results in an employee
exceeding the million dollar
supplemental wage threshold,
mandatory flat rate withholding will
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
769
apply to the extent that the payment
together with other supplemental wage
payments made to the employee
previously during the year is an excess
of one million dollars. However, to the
extent that such a supplemental wage
payment does not exceed one million
dollars when combined with the other
previous supplemental wage payments,
the mandatory flat rate does not apply,
and withholding may be calculated on
that portion of the payment under the
rules generally applicable to other
supplemental wage payments.
Withholding on regular wages of the
employee will continue to be calculated
under the method used by the employer
with respect to regular wages after the
employee has reached the million dollar
supplemental wage threshold.
The regulations also clarify that the
mandatory flat rate applies regardless of
the withholding method used by the
employer with respect to regular wages.
The regulations also clarify that
mandatory flat rate withholding applies
even if the employee receiving the
supplemental wages in excess of $1
million has a Form W–4 asserting
exempt status pursuant to section
3402(n). Moreover, the regulations also
clarify that mandatory flat rate
withholding applies to noncash
remuneration paid to a retail
commission salesperson (section
3402(j)) to the extent that such
remuneration constitutes supplemental
wages and exceeds $1 million in a given
taxable year.
Examples of how the withholding
would be calculated under the
mandatory flat rate are included in the
regulation. Among other things, the
examples illustrate that because the
higher rate is mandatory, where an
employer provides net bonuses (i.e.,
after withholding) at a specified level,
the total of the amount of such net
bonuses and the gross up for
withholding that are in excess of $1
million of supplemental wages will be
subject to the higher rate.
The proposed regulations also clarify
that, generally, where an employer has
paid an employee supplemental wages
that are cumulatively one million
dollars or less for a given taxable year,
the flat rate of withholding on
supplemental wages can be used only if
(1) income tax has been withheld from
the employee’s regular wages and (2) the
supplemental wages are either not paid
concurrently with regular wages of the
employer if paid concurrently with
regular wages, are separately stated on
the payroll records of the employer.
The proposed regulations do not
change the Federal Insurance
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
770
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Contributions Act (FICA) taxation of
wages.
PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND
COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT
SOURCE
Proposed Effective Date
This regulation will be effective on
the date published as a final regulation
in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has been determined that section 553(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations, and because the regulation
does not impose a collection of
information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulation are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and 8 copies)
or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and Treasury Department request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
rules and how they can be made easier
to understand. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing may be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is A. G. Kelley, Office of
Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury participated
in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 31
Proposed Amendment to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR is proposed to be
amended as follows:
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 31.3402(n)–1 also issued
under 26 U.S.C. 6011 and 6364. * * *
Par. 2. Section 31.3401(a)–1 is
amended by revising paragraph
(b)(8)(i)(b)(2) as follows:
§ 31.3401(a)–1
Wages.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Payments made by agents subject
to this paragraph are supplemental
wages as defined in § 31.3402(g)–1, and
are therefore subject to the rules
regarding withholding tax on
supplemental wages provided in
§ 31.3402(g)–1. For purposes of those
rules, unless the agent is also an agent
for purposes of withholding tax from the
employees’ regular wages, the agent may
deem tax to have been withheld form
regular wages paid to the employee
during the calendar year.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3 Section 31.3401(a)–4 is
amended by revising paragraph (c) to
read as follows
§ 31.3401(a)–4 Reimbursements and other
expense allowance amounts.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Withholding rate. Payments made
under reimbursement or other expense
allowance arrangements that are subject
to income tax withholding are
supplemental wages under § 31.3402(g)–
1 if paid in addition to regular wages.
Accordingly, withholding on such
supplemental wages is calculated under
the rules provided with respect to
supplemental wages in § 31.3402(g)–1.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 4. Section 31.3402(g)–1 is
amended by:
(1) Revising paragraph (a).
(2) Adding a sentence at the beginning
of paragraph (b)(1).
(3) Revising paragraph (b)(2).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 31.3402(g)–1
payments.
Employment taxes, Income taxes.
VerDate jul<14>2003
Paragraph 1. The authority citation to
part 31 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read, as follows:
Supplemental wage
(a) In general and withholding
applicable with respect to supplemental
wages in excess of $1,000,000. (1)(i) An
employee’s remuneration may consist of
regular wages and supplemental wages.
Supplemental wages are all wages paid
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
by an employer that are not regular
wages. Supplemental wages include
wage payment made without regard to
an employee’s payroll period, but also
may include payments made for a
payroll period. Examples of wage
payments that are included in
supplemental wages, if paid in addition
to regular wages, include bonuses,
overtime pay, back pay, reported tips,
commissions, wages paid under
reimbursement or other expense
allowance, wages paid as noncash fringe
benefits, sick pay paid by a third party
as an agent of the employer, amounts
that are includible in gross income
under section 409A, and income
recognized on the exercise of a
nonqualified stock option.
(ii) As distinguished form
supplemental wages, regular wages are
amounts that are paid at a regular
hourly, daily, or similar periodic rate
(and not an overtime rate) for the
current payroll period or at a
predetermined fixed determinable
amount for the current payroll period.
Thus, among other things, wages that
vary from payroll period to payroll
period (such as commissions, tips, or
bonuses) are not regular wages if paid in
addition to regular wages. Any overtime
pay paid in addition to regular wages
would not be included in regular wages.
However, if the only wages that an
employee receives during a calendar
year are bonuses, commissions, tips, or
another type of payments that would
normally be classified as supplemental
wages if paid in addition to regular
wages, then such wages are treated as
regular wages. For example, if the only
wages an employee receives are
commissions paid on a monthly basis,
then the payment of the commissions by
the employer would be regular wages
paid for a monthly payroll period.
(iii) The calculation of the amount of
the income tax withholding with respect
to supplemental wage payments is
provided for under paragraph (a)(2)
through (a)(7) of this section.
(2) If a supplemental wage payment,
when added to all supplemental wage
payments previously made by one
employer (as defined in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section) to an employee during
the calendar year, exceeds $1,000,000,
the rate used in determining the amount
of withholding on the excess (including
any excess which is apportion of a
supplemental wage payment) shall be
equal to the highest rate of tax
applicable under section 1 for such
taxable years beginning in such calendar
year. This flat rate shall be applied
without regard to whether income tax
has been withheld from the employee’s
regular wages, without allowance for the
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
number of withholding allowances
claimed by the employee on Form W–
4, ‘‘Employee’s Withholding Allowance
Certificate’’, without regard to whether
the employee has claimed exempt status
on Form W–4, and without regard to the
withholding method used by the
employer.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section, including for purposes of
determining whether any given payment
is a payment of supplemental wages
subject to paragraph (a)(2) of the
section—
(i) All persons treated as a single
employer under subsection (a) to (b) of
section 52 shall be treated as one
employer; and
(ii) Any payment made to an
employee by a third party acting as an
agent for the employer (regardless of
whether such person shall have been
designated as an agent pursuant to
section 3504) shall be considered as
made by the employer.
(4) To the extent that paragraph (a)(2)
of this section does not apply to a
supplemental wage payment (or a
portion of a payment), the amount of the
tax required to be withheld on the
supplemental wages when they are paid
shall be determined under the rules
provided in paragraphs (a)(5) and (6) of
this section.
(5)(i) The employer is required to
determine withholding upon
supplemental wages under this
paragraph (a)(5) if paragraph (a)(2) of
this section does not apply to the
payment or portion of the payment and
if paragraph (a)(6) of this section may
not be used with respect to the payment.
In addition, employers have the option
of using this paragraph (a)(5) to
calculate withholding with respect to a
supplemental wage payment, if
paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not
apply to the payment, built if paragraph
(a)(6) of this section could be used with
respect to the payment.
(ii) Provided this procedure applies
under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section,
the supplemental wages, if paid
concurrently with wages for payroll
period, are aggregated with the wages
paid for such payroll period. If not paid
concurrently, the supplemental wages
are aggregated with the wages paid or to
be paid within the same calendar year
for the last preceding payroll period or
for the current payroll period. The
amount of tax to be withheld is
determined as if the aggregate of the
supplemental wages and the regular
wages constituted a single wage
payment for the regular payroll period.
(6)(i) The employer may determine
withholding upon supplemental wages
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
under this paragraph (a)(6) if three
conditions are met—
(A) Paragraph (a)(2) of this section
does not apply to the payment or the
portion of the payment;
(B) The supplemental wages are either
not paid concurrently with regular
wages or are separately stated on the
payroll records of the employer; and
(C) Income tax has been withheld
from the employee’s regular wages.
(ii) The determination of the tax to be
withheld under paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of
this section is made without allowance
for exemption and without reference to
any payment of regular wages.
(iii) Provided the conditions of
paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section have
been met, the employer may determine
the tax to be withheld—
(A) From supplemental wages paid
after April 30, 1966, and prior to
January 1, 1994, by using a flat
percentage rate of 20 percent;
(B) From supplemental wages paid
after December 31, 1993, and on or
before August 6, 2001, by using a flat
percentage rate of 28 percent;
(C) From supplemental wages paid
after August 6, 2001, and on or before
December 31, 2001, by using a flat
percentage rate of 27.5 percent;
(D) From supplemental wages paid
after December 31, 2001, and on or
before May 27, 2003, by using a flat
percentage rate of 27 percent;
(E) From supplemental wages paid
after May 27, 2003, and on or before
December 31, 2004, by using a flat
percentage rate of 25 percent; and
(F) From supplemental wages paid
after December 31, 2004, by using a flat
percentage rate of 28 percent (or the
corresponding rate in effect under
section 1(i)(2) for taxable years
beginning in the calendar year in which
the payment is made).
(7) The following examples illustrate
this paragraph (a):
Example 1. (i) A is an employee of three
entities (X, Y, and Z) that are treated as a
single employer under section 52(a) or (b). In
year 20XX, A receives regular wages on a
monthly payroll periods paid by X for
services performed for X, Y, and Z on the
third business day of each month. The
maximum rate of income tax under section
1 in effect for year 20XX is 35 percent, and
the corresponding rate to 28 percent in effect
under section 1(i)(2) for taxable years
beginning in 20XX is 25 percent. Income tax
is withheld from the regular wages of A
during the year. A receives only the
following supplemental wage payments
during 20XX in addition to the regular wages
paid by X—
(a) a bonus of $600,000 from X on March
15, 20XX;
(b) a bonus of $2,300,000 from Y on
November 15, 20XX; and
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
771
(c) a bonus of $10,000 from Z on December
31, 20XX.
(ii) In this Example 1, the withholding on
the $600,000 payment from X could be
determined under either paragraph (a)(5) or
(6) of this section because income tax has
been withheld from the regular wages of A.
If X elects to use the aggregate procedure
under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the
amount of withholding on the supplemental
wages would be based on aggregating the
supplemental wages and the regular wages
paid by X either for the current or last payroll
period and treating the total of the regular
wages paid by X and the $600,000
supplemental wages as a single payment for
a regular payroll period. The withholding
method used by the employer with respect to
regular wages would then be used to
calculate the withholding on this single wage
payment, and the employer would take into
consideration the Form W–4 filed by the
employee.
(iii) In this Example 1, because the
$2,300,000 bonus from Y, together with the
regular wages paid by X, is treated as made
from one employer, the payment is a
supplemental wage payment. To calculate
the withholding on the $2,300,000
supplemental wage payment from Y, it
would be necessary to take into account that
A has already received $600,000 of
supplemental wages from X, which is treated
as the same employer as Y under section
52(a) or (b). Thus, the withholding on the
amount of the payment not in excess of
$1,000,000 cumulative supplemental wages
would need to be computed separately from
the amount of the payment above $1,000,000.
With respect to the first component of this
supplemental wage payment, equal to
$400,000, the withholding could be
computed under either paragraph (a)(5) or
(a)(6) of this section, because income tax has
been withheld from the regular wages of the
employee. If Y elected to withhold income
tax using paragraph (a)(6) of this section, Y
would withhold on the $400,000 component
at 25 percent (pursuant to paragraph
(a)(6)(ii)(F) of this section), which would
result in $100,000 tax withheld. The second
component of $1,900,000 would be subject to
mandatory income tax withholding at the
maximum rate of tax in effect under section
1 for 20XX. The income tax required to be
withheld on the second component of this
supplemental wage payment would be
calculated without regard to the Form W–4
filed by A and would be 35 percent of
$1,900,000 or $665,000. The withholding on
the first component and the withholding on
the second component then would be added
together to determine the total income tax
withholding on the supplemental wage
payment from Y, or $100,000 plus $665,000
($765,000).
(iv) The bonus paid from Z is also a
supplemental wage payment, because Z,
together with X, is treated as a single
employer. The calculation of the withholding
on the supplemental wage payment from Z
to A of $10,000 would also be required to
take into account that A has received prior
supplemental wage payments during the year
in excess of one million dollars from X and
Y, because Z is treated as the same employer
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
772
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
as X and Y. The income tax required to be
withheld on this payment would be 35
percent of $10,000 or $3,500.
Example 2. Employees B and C work for
employer M. Each employee receives
monthly salaries of $3,000 which are paid on
the fifth business day after the end of the
month. As a result of the withholding
allowances claimed by B, there is no income
tax withholding on the regular wages of B
paid by M. In contrast, M has withheld
income tax from C’s regular wages paid by M.
Together with the monthly salary check paid
on the fifth business day of December, M
includes a bonus of $2,000, which is the only
supplemental wage payment received by
each employee for the calendar year. The
bonuses are separately stated on the payroll
records of M. M must calculate the income
tax withholding required to be made with
respect to the bonus paid to B by using the
procedure set forth in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section. With respect to the bonus paid to C,
M has the option of using either the aggregate
method provided under paragraph (a)(5) of
this section or the optional flat rate provided
under paragraph (a)(6) of this section to
calculate the income tax withholding due.
Example 3. (i) Employee D works as an
employee of Corporation R. Corporations R,
S, and T are treated as a single employer
under subsection (a) or (b) of section 52.
Employee D receives regular wage payments
of $200,000 on a monthly basis in 2005 from
R and income tax is withheld from those
wages. D receives a bonus for his services as
an employee from R equal to $3,000,000 on
June 30, 2005. Unrelated company U pays D
sick pay as an agent of the employer R and
such sick pay is supplemental wages
pursuant to § 31.3401(a)–1(b)(2). D receives
sick pay of $50,000 on October 31, 2005.
Corporation T decides to award bonuses to
all employees of R, S, and T, and pays a
bonus of $100,000 to D on December 31,
2005. D received no other payments from U,
P, or T.
(ii) In chronological summary, D receives
the following wages other than the regular
monthly wages paid by R:
June 30, 2005—$3,000,000 (bonus from R)
October 31, 2005—$50,000 (sick pay from U)
December 31, 2005—$100,000 (bonus from T)
(iii) In this Example 3, each payment of
wages other than the regular monthly wage
payments from R is considered to be
supplemental wages for purposes of
withholding under § 31.3402(g)–1(a)(2)
because, pursuant to § 31.3402(g)–1(a)(3), the
payments are treated as made by one
employer. The amount of regular wages from
R is irrelevant in determining when
maximum rate withholding on supplemental
wages applies.
(iv) Because income tax has been withheld
on the regular wages of the employee, income
tax may be withheld on $1,000,000 of the
$3,000,000 bonus paid on June 30, 2005,
under either paragraph (a)(5) or (6) of this
section. If R elects to withhold income tax at
the flat rate provided under paragraph
(a)(6)(ii)(F), withholding would be calculated
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
at 25 percent of the $1,000,000 portion of the
payment, or $250,000.
(v) Income tax withheld on the following
supplemental wage payments (or portion of
a payment) as follows is required to be
calculated at the maximum rate in effect
under section 1(c), or 35 percent in 2005—
(A) $2,000,000 of the $3,000,000 bonus
paid by R on June 30, 2005;
(B) $50,000, the sick pay paid on October
31, 2005; and
(C) $100,000, the bonus paid by T on
December 31, 2005.
Example 4. (i) Employer J has decided it
wants to grant its employee B a $1,000,000
net bonus (after withholding). Employer J has
withheld income tax from the regular wages
of the employee. B has received no other
supplemental wage payments during the
year. The mandatory flat rate in effect in the
year in which the payment is made is 35
percent, and the optional flat rate in effect is
25 percent.
(ii) This Example 4 requires grossing up
the wage payment to determine the gross
wages necessary to result in a net payment
of $1,000,000. If the employer elected to use
the flat rate applicable to supplemental
wages, the first $1,000,000 of the wages
would be subject to 25 percent withholding.
However, any wages above that would be
subject to mandatory 35 percent withholding.
The withholding applicable to the first
$1,000,000 (i.e., $250,000) would thus be
required to be grossed-up at a 35 percent rate
to determine the gross wage amount above
$1,000,000. Thus, the wages above
$1,000,000 would be equal to $250,000
divided by .65 (computed by subtracting .35
from 1) or $384,615.38. Thus the total
withholding with respect to the payment if
Employer J elected the flat rate with respect
to the first $1,000,000, would be $384,615.38
and the total supplemental wage payment,
taking into account income tax withholding
only (and not Federal Insurance
Contributions Act taxes), to B would be
$1,384,615.38.
(8) For provisions relating to the
treatment of wages that are not subject
to paragraph (a)(2) of this section and
that are paid other than in cash to retail
commission salesmen, see
§ 31,3402(j)–1.
(b) Special rule where aggregate
withholding exemption exceeds wages
paid. (1) This rule applies only if
paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not
apply to the supplemental wage
payment. * * *
(2) The rules prescribed in this
paragraph shall, at the election of the
employer, be applied in lieu of the rules
prescribed in paragraph (a) of this
section except that this paragraph shall
not be applicable in any case in which
the payroll period of the employee is
less than one week or if paragraph (a)(2)
applies to the supplemental wage
payment.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Par. 5. Section 31.3402(j)–1 is
amended by adding a new sentence at
the beginning of paragraph (a)(2) to read
as follows:
§ 31.3402(j)–1 Remuneration other than in
cash for service performed by retail
commission salesman.
(a) * * *
(2) Section 3402(j) and this section are
not applicable with respect to wages
paid to the employee that are subject to
withholding under section 31.3402(g)–
1(a)(2). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 6. Section 31.3402(n)–1 is revised
and the authority citation at the end of
the section is removed to read as
follows:
§ 31.3402(n)–1 Employees incurring no
income tax liability.
(a) Notwithstanding any other
provision of this subpart (except to the
extent a payment of wages is subject to
withholding under § 31.3402(g)–1(a)(2)),
an employer shall not deduct and
withhold any tax under chapter 24 upon
a payment of wages made to an
employee after April 30, 1970, if there
is in effect with respect to the payment
a withholding exemption certificate
furnished to the employer by the
employee which contains statements
that—
(1) The employee incurred no liability
for income tax imposed under subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code for his
preceding taxable year; and
(2) The employee anticipates that he
will incur no liability for income tax
imposed under subtitle A for his current
taxable year.
(b) To the extent wages are subject to
withholding under § 31.3402(g)–1(a)(2),
such wages are subject to such income
tax withholding regardless of whether a
withholding exemption certificate under
section 3402(n) and the regulations
thereunder has been furnished to the
employer.
(c) For purposes of section 3402(n)
and this section, an employee is not
considered to incur liability for income
tax imposed under subtitle A if the
amount of such tax is equal to or less
than the total amount of credits against
such tax which are allowable to him
under part iv of subchapter A of chapter
1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other
than those allowable under section 31 or
39. For purposes of seciton 3402(n) and
this section, ‘‘liability for income tax
imposed under subtitle A’’ shall include
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
liability for a qualified State individual
income tax which is treated pursuant to
section 6361(a) as if it were imposed by
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
An employee is not considered to incur
liability for such a State income tax if
the amount of such tax does not exceed
the total amount of the credit against
such tax which is allowable to him
under section 6362(b)(2)(B) or (C) or
section 6362(c)(4). For purposes of this
section, an employee who files a joint
return under section 6013 is considered
to incur liability for any tax shown on
such return. An employee who is
entitled to file a joint return under such
section shall not certify that he
anticipates that he will incur no liability
for income tax imposed by subtitle A for
his current taxable year if such
statement would not be true in the event
that he files a joint return for such year,
unless he filed a separate return for his
preceding taxable year and anticipates
that he will file a separate return for his
current taxable year.
(d) For rules relating to invalid
withholding exemption certificates, see
§ 31.3402(f)(2)–1(e), and for rules
relating to submission to the Internal
Revenue Service of withholding
exemption certificates claiming a
complete exemption from withholding,
see § 31.3402(f)(2)–1(g).
(e) Example 1. Employee A, an unmarried,
calendar-year basis taxpayer, files his income
tax return for 1970 on April 15, 1971. A has
adjusted gross income of $1,200 and is not
liable for any tax. He had $180 of income tax
withheld during 1970. A anticipates that his
gross income for 1971 will be approximately
the same amount, and that he will not incur
income tax liability for that year. On April
20, 1971, A commences employment and
furnishes his employer an exemption
certificate stating that he incurred no liability
for income tax imposed under subtitle A for
1970, and that he anticipates that he will
incur no liability for income tax imposed
under subtitle A for 1971. A’s employer shall
not deduct and withhold on payments of
wages made to A on or after April 20, 1971.
Under § 31.3402(f)(4)–1(c), unless A files a
new exemption certificate with his employer,
his employer is required to deduct and
withhold upon payments of wages to A made
on or after May 1, 1972. Under
§ 31.3402(f)(3)–1(b), if A had been employed
by his employer prior to April 20, 1971, and
had furnished his employer a withholding
exemption certificate not containing the
statements described in § 31.3402(n)–1 proir
to furnishing the withholding exemption
certificate containing such statements on
April 20, 1971, his employer would not be
required to give effect to the new certificate
with respect to payments of wages made by
him prior to July 1, 1971 (the first status
determiantion date which occurs at least 30
days after April 20, 1971). However his
employer could, if he chose, make the new
certificate effective with respect to any
payment of wages made on or after April 20
and before July 1, 1971.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Jan 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Example 2. Assume the facts are the same
as in Example 1 except that for 1970 A has
taxable income of $8,000, income tax liability
of $1,630, and income tax withheld of
$1,700. Although A received a refund of $70
due to income tax withholding of $1,700, he
may not state on his exemption certificate
that he incurred no liability for income tax
imposed by subtitle A for 1970.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–71 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–04–129]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Townsend Gut, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing
to temporarily change the drawbridge
operation regulations for the operation
of the SR 27 Bridge, at mile 0.7, across
Townsend Gut, between Boothbay
Harbor and Southport, Maine. This
temporary rule would require the bridge
to open at specific times between 6 a.m.
and 6 p.m., each day, from March 1,
2005, through November 30, 2005.
Additionally, this temporary rule would
also allow the bridge to remain closed
for four periods of four days each
between March 1, 2005, and May 26,
2005. This action is necessary to help
facilitate rehabilitation construction at
the bridge.
DATES: Comments must reach the Coast
Guard on or before March 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments to
Commander (obr), First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch, One South
Street, Battery Park Building, New York,
New York 10004, or deliver them to the
same address between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except,
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (212) 668–7165. The First Coast
Guard District, Bridge Branch,
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
773
Mr.
John W. McDonald Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (617) 223–8364.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments or related material. If you do
so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD01–04–129),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know if they reached us, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the First
Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch, at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The SR 27 Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 10 feet at mean high water,
and 19 feet at mean low water in the
closed position. The existing
drawbridge operating regulations under
33 CFR 117.5 require the bridge to open
on signal at all times.
The bridge owner, Maine Department
of Transportation, has requested a
temporary rule to allow the bridge to
open at specific times of either two or
three hour intervals between 6 a.m. and
6 p.m., from March 1, 2005, through
November 30, 2005. The purpose of this
temporary rule is to help facilitate
rehabilitation construction at the bridge.
Frequent unscheduled bridge openings
would greatly limit the progress of the
rehabilitation project.
Under this temporary rule, effective
from March 1, 2005, through November
30, 2005, the SR 27 Bridge would
operate as follows:
From March 1, 2005, through May 26,
2005, and from September 6, 2005,
through November 30, 2005, the draw
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 767-773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-71]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
[REG-152945-04]
RIN 1545-BD96
Flat Rate Supplemental Wage Withholding
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations amending the
regulations that provide for the flat rate of withholding applicable to
calculating the amount of income tax withholding on supplemental wages.
The proposed amendment to the regulations reflects changes in the law
made by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993, the Economic Growth and
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2003, and the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
Under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the optional flat rate
for withholding on supplemental wages will generally remain at 25
percent for payments made after December 31, 2004, but may change if
income tax rates change. However, the 2004 Act also provides that,
after 2004, if an employee receives supplemental wages in excess of one
million dollars from an employer in a calendar year, the excess of the
supplemental wages over one million dollars is subject to mandatory
income tax withholding at the highest income tax rate. The highest
income tax rate is currently 35 percent. In determining whether an
employer has reached the one million dollar threshold for an employee,
supplemental wage payments from all businesses under common control and
from agents will be taken into account.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by April 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-152945-04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submission may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
152945-04), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC or sent electronically, via the IRS
Internet site at https://www.irs.gov/regs or via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG-152945-04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
A. G. Kelley, (202) 622-6040; concerning submission of comments, Treena
Garrett, (202) 622-3401 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Employment Tax Regulations distinguish between regular wages
paid for a payroll period and supplemental wages for purposes of income
tax withholding. Although the regulations do not give a comprehensive
definition of the term ``supplemental wages,'' the regulations provide
that supplemental wages include ``* * * bonuses, commissions, and
overtime pay, paid for the same or a different period, or without
regard to a particular period.'' Regulations and revenue rulings have
provided other examples. See Sec. 31.3401(a)-1(b)(8)(i)(b)(2) of the
regulations (sick pay paid by an agent of the employer); Sec.
31.3401(a)-4(c) of the regulations (wages paid under reimbursement and
other expense allowance arrangements); Rev. Rul. 67-257)1967-2 C.B.
359) (income recognized on exercise of nonqualified stock option); Rev.
Rul. 67-131 (1967-1 C.B. 291) (lump sum payment of accumulated annual
leave); and Rev. Rul. 66-294 (1966-2 C.B. 459) (lump sum vacation
payment, overtime pay, lump sum retroactive pay, sick pay paid
separately from regular pay).
Section 31.3402(g)-1 of the regulations provides the current rules
for withholding income tax from a payment of supplemental wages. Two
procedures have been generally available to the employer with respect
to such supplemental wage payments. Under the first procedure (the
aggregate procedure), employers calculate the amount of withholding due
by aggregating the amount of supplemental wages with the regular wages
paid for the current payroll period or for the most recent payroll
period this year, and treating the aggregate as if it were a single
wage payment for the regular payroll period.
[[Page 768]]
The second procedure for withholding on supplemental wages (the
flat rate procedure) allows employers to disregard the amount of
regular wages paid to an employee as well as the allowances claimed by
an employee on Form W-4, ``Employee's Withholding Allowance
Certificate,'' and use a flat percentage rate specified in the
regulations in calculating the amount of withholding. This second
procedure of withholding on supplemental wages is generally available
only if (1) the employer has withheld income tax from regular wages
paid the employee, and (2) the supplemental wages are either (a) not
paid concurrently with regular wages or (b) separately stated on the
payroll records of the employer. See Rev. Rul. 82-200 (1982-2 C.B.
239). Under the current regulations, if the supplemental wage payment
satisfies the conditions necessary for use of the flat rate, the
decision whether to use the flat rate rather than the aggregate
procedure is discretionary with the employer. Section 31.3042(g)-
1(a)(2), last modified in 1966, states that, for wages paid after April
30, 1966, the flat percentage rate on supplemental wages is 20 percent.
Later statutory changes have changed the applicable rate and the
regulation is being amended to reflect those changes.
Section 13273 of Public Law 103-66 (the Revenue Reconciliation Act
of 1993; 107 Stat. 542) provides that the rate under section
31.3402(g)-1 ``shall not be less than 28 percent.'' This change was
effective for payments made after December 31, 1993., The Conference
Report in connection with this change states that the provision
``increases the applicable withholding rate on supplemental wage
payments to 28 percent.'' H.R. Rep. No. 103-111, 103d Cong., 1st Sess.
701 (1993).
Section 101(c)(11) of Public Law 107-16 (the Economic Growth and
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001; 115 Stat. 44) amended section
13273 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 by striking ``28
percent'' and inserting ``the third lowest rate of tax applicable under
section 1(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.'' Section 101(d)(2)
of Public Law 107-16 provides that the change made by section
101(c)(11) shall apply to ``amounts paid after the 60th day after the
date of enactment of this Act.'' Public Law 107-16 was enacted into law
on June 7, 2001. The third lowest rate of tax applicable under section
1(c) for purposes of section 13273 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of
1993 was 27.5 percent. Consequently, the withholding rate for
supplemental wages paid after August 6, 2001, and on or before December
31, 2001, was 27.5 percent. For 2002 the third lowest rate of tax
applicable under section 1(c) was 27 percent. As a result of the
enactment of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
(Public Law 108-27) on May 28, 2003, the third lowest rate of tax
applicable under section 1(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for
2003 and 2004 is 25 percent.
Section 904(a) of Public Law 108-357, 118 Stat. 1418 (the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004) provides that, generally, for payments after
December 31, 2004, the flat rate for withholding on supplemental wage
rate ``shall not be less than 28 percent (or the corresponding rate in
effect under section 1(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for
taxable years beginning in the calendar year in which the payment is
made).'' For 2005, the corresponding rate in effect under section
1(i)(2) is 25 percent.
Section 904(b) of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 also
established a mandatory flat rate of withholding on supplemental wages
to the extent that the employee's total supplemental wages paid by the
employer exceed one million dollars during the calendar year. Section
904(b) provides that ``[n]otwithstanding subsection (a), if the
supplemental wage payment, when added to all such payments previously
made by the employer to the employee during the calendar year, exceeds
$1,000,000, the rate used with respect to such excess shall be equal to
the maximum rate of tax in effect under section 1 of such Code for such
taxable years beginning in such calendar year.'' The maximum rate of
tax in effect under section 1 of the Code is currently 35 percent.
Section 904(b)(2) also provides that all persons treated as a single
employer under subsection (a) or (b) of section 52 of the Code shall be
treated as a single employer for purposes of this provision. This new
mandatory withholding on supplemental wages in excess of one million
dollars is effective with respect to payments made after December 31,
2004.
This provision is described in the Conference Report as follows:
``Under the Senate amendment, once annual supplemental wage payments to
an employee exceed $1 million, any additional supplemental wage
payments to the employee in that year are subject to withholding at the
highest income tax rate (35 percent for 2004 and 2005), regardless of
any other withholding rules and regardless of the employee's Form W-
4.'' H.R. Rep. No. 108-475 at 785-6 (2004).
This provision for withholding on supplemental wages in excess of
one million dollars was originally included as part of S. 2424, 108th
Cong., 2d Sess. (2004). The legislative history in connection with S.
2424 provided as follows with respect to the reasons for change: ``The
Committee believes that because most employees who receive annual
supplemental wage payments in excess of $1 million will ultimately be
taxed at the highest rate, it is appropriate to raise the withholding
rate on such payments so that withholding more closely approximates the
ultimate tax liability with respect to these payments.'' S. Rep. No.
108-266 at 105 (2004).
In a conforming amendment, the 2004 Act repealed section 13273 of
the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations change the optional flat rate of
withholding on supplemental wages to provide that the 20 percent rate
applies only to supplemental wages paid prior to January 1, 1994. The
rate of 28 percent applies to supplemental wages paid after December
31, 1993, and on or before August 6, 2001. The Revenue Reconciliation
Act of 1993, as amended by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2003, provides that the supplemental withholding
rate shall not be less than the third lowest rate of tax applicable
under section 1(c) for wages paid after August 6, 2001, and before
January 1, 2005. Consistent with this amendment, the regulations
provide that the rate of 27.5 percent applies to supplemental wages
paid after August 6, 2001, and on or before December 31, 2001, the rate
of 27 percent applies to wages paid after December 31, 2001, and on or
before May 27, 2003, and the rate of 25 percent applies to wages paid
after May 27, 2003, and on or before, December 31, 2004. Although the
Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 provided that the
third lowest rate of tax under section 1(c) after December 31, 2002,
would be 25 percent, this provision was not enacted into law until May
28, 2003. Thus, at the time of payments of supplemental wages made
after December 31, 2002, and prior to May 28, 2003, the third lowest
rate of tax under section 1(c) was 27 percent. This provision is
consistent with the general principle that the employment taxation of
wage payments is determined based on the rates in effect at the date
the wages are paid. United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.,
532 U.S. 200 (2001).
To track the statutory language of the American Jobs Creation Act
of 2004, the regulation provides that, for wages paid after December
31, 2004, the flat rate for
[[Page 769]]
supplemental wages is generally 28 percent (or the corresponding rate
in effect under section 1(i)(2) * * * for taxable years beginning in
the calendar year in which the payment is made). Under current law, the
corresponding rate in effect under section 1(i)(2) for taxable years
beginning in 2005 is 25 percent. Thus, for 2005, the optional flat rate
for supplemental wages under $1 million in a given taxable year is 25
percent. The optional flat rate will remain at 25 percent until income
tax rates change.\1\ However, as described below, a higher mandatory
rate applies for withholding on supplemental wages in excess of one
million dollars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under current law, section 1(i)(2) will not be applicable to
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010, pursuant to the
sunset provisions contained in section 901 of the Economic Growth
and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-16; 115
Stat. 150). See also section 107 of Public Law 108-27 (117 Stat.
755). Absent legislative action, the optional flat rate will change
to 28 percent in 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulation provides that if a supplemental wage payment,
together with all other supplemental wage payments paid by an employer
to an employee during the calendar year, exceeds one million dollars,
the withholding rate on the supplemental wages in excess of one million
dollars shall be equal to the maximum rate of tax in effect under
section 1 for taxable years beginning in such calendar year. Under
current law, the maximum rate of tax in effect for taxable years
beginning in 2005 is 35 percent. Thus, in 2005, the mandatory flat rate
for supplemental wages in excess of $1 million in a given taxable year
is 35 percent. The mandatory rate will remain at 35 percent until
income tax rates change.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Under the sunset provision in section 901 of the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the mandatory flat
rate will change to 39.6 percent for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed regulations also clarify which wages are classified
as supplemental wages. Under the proposed regulations, supplemental
wages include any payment of wages by an employer that is not regular
wages. Regular wages are defined as amounts paid by an employer for a
payroll period either at a regular hourly rate or in a predetermined
fixed amount. Wages that vary from payroll period to payroll period
based on factors other than the amount of time worked, such as
commissions, tips, and bonuses, are supplemental wages if they are paid
in addition to regular wages. See Rev. Rul. 82-46 (1982-1 C.B. 158).
However, if an employee receive only one type of compensation from an
employer, that type of compensation will be regular wages even if the
type of compensation is something that would normally be classified as
supplemental wages. For example, if an employee receives only stock
options as compensation from the employer and receives no other wages
(including no includible fringe benefits that are wages), then the
income on the exercise of the options would generally be regular wages,
rather than supplemental wages.
The definitions of supplemental wages and regular wages were
developed based on the historical usage of the term in regulations and
revenue rulings. Examples are included in the regulations to illustrate
the application of the definitions to specific scenarios. The IRS
welcomes comments on whether this definition of supplemental wages is
appropriate.
When determining whether payments are regular wages or supplemental
wages, and furthermore, whether the supplemental wages paid by an
employer to an employee in a given taxable year exceed $1 million, an
employer (the first employer) must consider wage payments made to the
employee by any other person treated as a single employer with the
first employer under section 52(a) or 52(b). Furthermore, if an
employer enlists a third party to make a payment to an employee on the
employer's behalf, the payment will be considered as made by the
employer even though it may have been delivered to the employee by the
third party.
The new mandatory withholding rate on supplemental wages can apply
to a full payment or only a portion of a payment. The maximum rate
withholding applies only to the excess of supplemental wages over one
million dollars received by an employee from an employer, taking into
consideration all payments of supplemental wages made by an employer to
an employee. All payments of supplemental wages are considered in
determining this threshold regardless of whether the payments were
subjected to flat rate withholding. The amount of regular wages paid to
the employee has no relevance in determining whether the new mandatory
withholding rate applies. Also, if a payment to an employee from an
employer is not ``wages'' as defined under section 3401(a), such
payment has no effect on whether the million dollar threshold for
mandatory flat rate withholding has been reached.
If a particular supplemental wage payment results in an employee
exceeding the million dollar supplemental wage threshold, mandatory
flat rate withholding will apply to the extent that the payment
together with other supplemental wage payments made to the employee
previously during the year is an excess of one million dollars.
However, to the extent that such a supplemental wage payment does not
exceed one million dollars when combined with the other previous
supplemental wage payments, the mandatory flat rate does not apply, and
withholding may be calculated on that portion of the payment under the
rules generally applicable to other supplemental wage payments.
Withholding on regular wages of the employee will continue to be
calculated under the method used by the employer with respect to
regular wages after the employee has reached the million dollar
supplemental wage threshold.
The regulations also clarify that the mandatory flat rate applies
regardless of the withholding method used by the employer with respect
to regular wages. The regulations also clarify that mandatory flat rate
withholding applies even if the employee receiving the supplemental
wages in excess of $1 million has a Form W-4 asserting exempt status
pursuant to section 3402(n). Moreover, the regulations also clarify
that mandatory flat rate withholding applies to noncash remuneration
paid to a retail commission salesperson (section 3402(j)) to the extent
that such remuneration constitutes supplemental wages and exceeds $1
million in a given taxable year.
Examples of how the withholding would be calculated under the
mandatory flat rate are included in the regulation. Among other things,
the examples illustrate that because the higher rate is mandatory,
where an employer provides net bonuses (i.e., after withholding) at a
specified level, the total of the amount of such net bonuses and the
gross up for withholding that are in excess of $1 million of
supplemental wages will be subject to the higher rate.
The proposed regulations also clarify that, generally, where an
employer has paid an employee supplemental wages that are cumulatively
one million dollars or less for a given taxable year, the flat rate of
withholding on supplemental wages can be used only if (1) income tax
has been withheld from the employee's regular wages and (2) the
supplemental wages are either not paid concurrently with regular wages
of the employer if paid concurrently with regular wages, are separately
stated on the payroll records of the employer.
The proposed regulations do not change the Federal Insurance
[[Page 770]]
Contributions Act (FICA) taxation of wages.
Proposed Effective Date
This regulation will be effective on the date published as a final
regulation in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because the
regulation does not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulation are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and 8
copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the IRS.
The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the clarity of the
proposed rules and how they can be made easier to understand. All
comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A public
hearing may be scheduled if requested in writing by any person that
timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled,
notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is A. G. Kelley, Office
of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 31
Employment taxes, Income taxes.
Proposed Amendment to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 31--EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE
Paragraph 1. The authority citation to part 31 is amended by adding
an entry in numerical order to read, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 31.3402(n)-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6011 and 6364. * *
*
Par. 2. Section 31.3401(a)-1 is amended by revising paragraph
(b)(8)(i)(b)(2) as follows:
Sec. 31.3401(a)-1 Wages.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Payments made by agents subject to this paragraph are
supplemental wages as defined in Sec. 31.3402(g)-1, and are therefore
subject to the rules regarding withholding tax on supplemental wages
provided in Sec. 31.3402(g)-1. For purposes of those rules, unless the
agent is also an agent for purposes of withholding tax from the
employees' regular wages, the agent may deem tax to have been withheld
form regular wages paid to the employee during the calendar year.
* * * * *
Par. 3 Section 31.3401(a)-4 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to
read as follows
Sec. 31.3401(a)-4 Reimbursements and other expense allowance amounts.
* * * * *
(c) Withholding rate. Payments made under reimbursement or other
expense allowance arrangements that are subject to income tax
withholding are supplemental wages under Sec. 31.3402(g)-1 if paid in
addition to regular wages. Accordingly, withholding on such
supplemental wages is calculated under the rules provided with respect
to supplemental wages in Sec. 31.3402(g)-1.
* * * * *
Par. 4. Section 31.3402(g)-1 is amended by:
(1) Revising paragraph (a).
(2) Adding a sentence at the beginning of paragraph (b)(1).
(3) Revising paragraph (b)(2).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 31.3402(g)-1 Supplemental wage payments.
(a) In general and withholding applicable with respect to
supplemental wages in excess of $1,000,000. (1)(i) An employee's
remuneration may consist of regular wages and supplemental wages.
Supplemental wages are all wages paid by an employer that are not
regular wages. Supplemental wages include wage payment made without
regard to an employee's payroll period, but also may include payments
made for a payroll period. Examples of wage payments that are included
in supplemental wages, if paid in addition to regular wages, include
bonuses, overtime pay, back pay, reported tips, commissions, wages paid
under reimbursement or other expense allowance, wages paid as noncash
fringe benefits, sick pay paid by a third party as an agent of the
employer, amounts that are includible in gross income under section
409A, and income recognized on the exercise of a nonqualified stock
option.
(ii) As distinguished form supplemental wages, regular wages are
amounts that are paid at a regular hourly, daily, or similar periodic
rate (and not an overtime rate) for the current payroll period or at a
predetermined fixed determinable amount for the current payroll period.
Thus, among other things, wages that vary from payroll period to
payroll period (such as commissions, tips, or bonuses) are not regular
wages if paid in addition to regular wages. Any overtime pay paid in
addition to regular wages would not be included in regular wages.
However, if the only wages that an employee receives during a calendar
year are bonuses, commissions, tips, or another type of payments that
would normally be classified as supplemental wages if paid in addition
to regular wages, then such wages are treated as regular wages. For
example, if the only wages an employee receives are commissions paid on
a monthly basis, then the payment of the commissions by the employer
would be regular wages paid for a monthly payroll period.
(iii) The calculation of the amount of the income tax withholding
with respect to supplemental wage payments is provided for under
paragraph (a)(2) through (a)(7) of this section.
(2) If a supplemental wage payment, when added to all supplemental
wage payments previously made by one employer (as defined in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section) to an employee during the calendar year,
exceeds $1,000,000, the rate used in determining the amount of
withholding on the excess (including any excess which is apportion of a
supplemental wage payment) shall be equal to the highest rate of tax
applicable under section 1 for such taxable years beginning in such
calendar year. This flat rate shall be applied without regard to
whether income tax has been withheld from the employee's regular wages,
without allowance for the
[[Page 771]]
number of withholding allowances claimed by the employee on Form W-4,
``Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate'', without regard to
whether the employee has claimed exempt status on Form W-4, and without
regard to the withholding method used by the employer.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, including for
purposes of determining whether any given payment is a payment of
supplemental wages subject to paragraph (a)(2) of the section--
(i) All persons treated as a single employer under subsection (a)
to (b) of section 52 shall be treated as one employer; and
(ii) Any payment made to an employee by a third party acting as an
agent for the employer (regardless of whether such person shall have
been designated as an agent pursuant to section 3504) shall be
considered as made by the employer.
(4) To the extent that paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not
apply to a supplemental wage payment (or a portion of a payment), the
amount of the tax required to be withheld on the supplemental wages
when they are paid shall be determined under the rules provided in
paragraphs (a)(5) and (6) of this section.
(5)(i) The employer is required to determine withholding upon
supplemental wages under this paragraph (a)(5) if paragraph (a)(2) of
this section does not apply to the payment or portion of the payment
and if paragraph (a)(6) of this section may not be used with respect to
the payment. In addition, employers have the option of using this
paragraph (a)(5) to calculate withholding with respect to a
supplemental wage payment, if paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not
apply to the payment, built if paragraph (a)(6) of this section could
be used with respect to the payment.
(ii) Provided this procedure applies under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of
this section, the supplemental wages, if paid concurrently with wages
for payroll period, are aggregated with the wages paid for such payroll
period. If not paid concurrently, the supplemental wages are aggregated
with the wages paid or to be paid within the same calendar year for the
last preceding payroll period or for the current payroll period. The
amount of tax to be withheld is determined as if the aggregate of the
supplemental wages and the regular wages constituted a single wage
payment for the regular payroll period.
(6)(i) The employer may determine withholding upon supplemental
wages under this paragraph (a)(6) if three conditions are met--
(A) Paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply to the payment
or the portion of the payment;
(B) The supplemental wages are either not paid concurrently with
regular wages or are separately stated on the payroll records of the
employer; and
(C) Income tax has been withheld from the employee's regular wages.
(ii) The determination of the tax to be withheld under paragraph
(a)(6)(iii) of this section is made without allowance for exemption and
without reference to any payment of regular wages.
(iii) Provided the conditions of paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this
section have been met, the employer may determine the tax to be
withheld--
(A) From supplemental wages paid after April 30, 1966, and prior to
January 1, 1994, by using a flat percentage rate of 20 percent;
(B) From supplemental wages paid after December 31, 1993, and on or
before August 6, 2001, by using a flat percentage rate of 28 percent;
(C) From supplemental wages paid after August 6, 2001, and on or
before December 31, 2001, by using a flat percentage rate of 27.5
percent;
(D) From supplemental wages paid after December 31, 2001, and on or
before May 27, 2003, by using a flat percentage rate of 27 percent;
(E) From supplemental wages paid after May 27, 2003, and on or
before December 31, 2004, by using a flat percentage rate of 25
percent; and
(F) From supplemental wages paid after December 31, 2004, by using
a flat percentage rate of 28 percent (or the corresponding rate in
effect under section 1(i)(2) for taxable years beginning in the
calendar year in which the payment is made).
(7) The following examples illustrate this paragraph (a):
Example 1. (i) A is an employee of three entities (X, Y, and Z)
that are treated as a single employer under section 52(a) or (b). In
year 20XX, A receives regular wages on a monthly payroll periods
paid by X for services performed for X, Y, and Z on the third
business day of each month. The maximum rate of income tax under
section 1 in effect for year 20XX is 35 percent, and the
corresponding rate to 28 percent in effect under section 1(i)(2) for
taxable years beginning in 20XX is 25 percent. Income tax is
withheld from the regular wages of A during the year. A receives
only the following supplemental wage payments during 20XX in
addition to the regular wages paid by X--
(a) a bonus of $600,000 from X on March 15, 20XX;
(b) a bonus of $2,300,000 from Y on November 15, 20XX; and
(c) a bonus of $10,000 from Z on December 31, 20XX.
(ii) In this Example 1, the withholding on the $600,000 payment
from X could be determined under either paragraph (a)(5) or (6) of
this section because income tax has been withheld from the regular
wages of A. If X elects to use the aggregate procedure under
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the amount of withholding on the
supplemental wages would be based on aggregating the supplemental
wages and the regular wages paid by X either for the current or last
payroll period and treating the total of the regular wages paid by X
and the $600,000 supplemental wages as a single payment for a
regular payroll period. The withholding method used by the employer
with respect to regular wages would then be used to calculate the
withholding on this single wage payment, and the employer would take
into consideration the Form W-4 filed by the employee.
(iii) In this Example 1, because the $2,300,000 bonus from Y,
together with the regular wages paid by X, is treated as made from
one employer, the payment is a supplemental wage payment. To
calculate the withholding on the $2,300,000 supplemental wage
payment from Y, it would be necessary to take into account that A
has already received $600,000 of supplemental wages from X, which is
treated as the same employer as Y under section 52(a) or (b). Thus,
the withholding on the amount of the payment not in excess of
$1,000,000 cumulative supplemental wages would need to be computed
separately from the amount of the payment above $1,000,000. With
respect to the first component of this supplemental wage payment,
equal to $400,000, the withholding could be computed under either
paragraph (a)(5) or (a)(6) of this section, because income tax has
been withheld from the regular wages of the employee. If Y elected
to withhold income tax using paragraph (a)(6) of this section, Y
would withhold on the $400,000 component at 25 percent (pursuant to
paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(F) of this section), which would result in
$100,000 tax withheld. The second component of $1,900,000 would be
subject to mandatory income tax withholding at the maximum rate of
tax in effect under section 1 for 20XX. The income tax required to
be withheld on the second component of this supplemental wage
payment would be calculated without regard to the Form W-4 filed by
A and would be 35 percent of $1,900,000 or $665,000. The withholding
on the first component and the withholding on the second component
then would be added together to determine the total income tax
withholding on the supplemental wage payment from Y, or $100,000
plus $665,000 ($765,000).
(iv) The bonus paid from Z is also a supplemental wage payment,
because Z, together with X, is treated as a single employer. The
calculation of the withholding on the supplemental wage payment from
Z to A of $10,000 would also be required to take into account that A
has received prior supplemental wage payments during the year in
excess of one million dollars from X and Y, because Z is treated as
the same employer
[[Page 772]]
as X and Y. The income tax required to be withheld on this payment
would be 35 percent of $10,000 or $3,500.
Example 2. Employees B and C work for employer M. Each employee
receives monthly salaries of $3,000 which are paid on the fifth
business day after the end of the month. As a result of the
withholding allowances claimed by B, there is no income tax
withholding on the regular wages of B paid by M. In contrast, M has
withheld income tax from C's regular wages paid by M. Together with
the monthly salary check paid on the fifth business day of December,
M includes a bonus of $2,000, which is the only supplemental wage
payment received by each employee for the calendar year. The bonuses
are separately stated on the payroll records of M. M must calculate
the income tax withholding required to be made with respect to the
bonus paid to B by using the procedure set forth in paragraph (a)(5)
of this section. With respect to the bonus paid to C, M has the
option of using either the aggregate method provided under paragraph
(a)(5) of this section or the optional flat rate provided under
paragraph (a)(6) of this section to calculate the income tax
withholding due.
Example 3. (i) Employee D works as an employee of Corporation R.
Corporations R, S, and T are treated as a single employer under
subsection (a) or (b) of section 52. Employee D receives regular
wage payments of $200,000 on a monthly basis in 2005 from R and
income tax is withheld from those wages. D receives a bonus for his
services as an employee from R equal to $3,000,000 on June 30, 2005.
Unrelated company U pays D sick pay as an agent of the employer R
and such sick pay is supplemental wages pursuant to Sec.
31.3401(a)-1(b)(2). D receives sick pay of $50,000 on October 31,
2005. Corporation T decides to award bonuses to all employees of R,
S, and T, and pays a bonus of $100,000 to D on December 31, 2005. D
received no other payments from U, P, or T.
(ii) In chronological summary, D receives the following wages
other than the regular monthly wages paid by R:
June 30, 2005--$3,000,000 (bonus from R)
October 31, 2005--$50,000 (sick pay from U)
December 31, 2005--$100,000 (bonus from T)
(iii) In this Example 3, each payment of wages other than the
regular monthly wage payments from R is considered to be
supplemental wages for purposes of withholding under Sec.
31.3402(g)-1(a)(2) because, pursuant to Sec. 31.3402(g)-1(a)(3),
the payments are treated as made by one employer. The amount of
regular wages from R is irrelevant in determining when maximum rate
withholding on supplemental wages applies.
(iv) Because income tax has been withheld on the regular wages
of the employee, income tax may be withheld on $1,000,000 of the
$3,000,000 bonus paid on June 30, 2005, under either paragraph
(a)(5) or (6) of this section. If R elects to withhold income tax at
the flat rate provided under paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(F), withholding
would be calculated at 25 percent of the $1,000,000 portion of the
payment, or $250,000.
(v) Income tax withheld on the following supplemental wage
payments (or portion of a payment) as follows is required to be
calculated at the maximum rate in effect under section 1(c), or 35
percent in 2005--
(A) $2,000,000 of the $3,000,000 bonus paid by R on June 30,
2005;
(B) $50,000, the sick pay paid on October 31, 2005; and
(C) $100,000, the bonus paid by T on December 31, 2005.
Example 4. (i) Employer J has decided it wants to grant its
employee B a $1,000,000 net bonus (after withholding). Employer J
has withheld income tax from the regular wages of the employee. B
has received no other supplemental wage payments during the year.
The mandatory flat rate in effect in the year in which the payment
is made is 35 percent, and the optional flat rate in effect is 25
percent.
(ii) This Example 4 requires grossing up the wage payment to
determine the gross wages necessary to result in a net payment of
$1,000,000. If the employer elected to use the flat rate applicable
to supplemental wages, the first $1,000,000 of the wages would be
subject to 25 percent withholding. However, any wages above that
would be subject to mandatory 35 percent withholding. The
withholding applicable to the first $1,000,000 (i.e., $250,000)
would thus be required to be grossed-up at a 35 percent rate to
determine the gross wage amount above $1,000,000. Thus, the wages
above $1,000,000 would be equal to $250,000 divided by .65 (computed
by subtracting .35 from 1) or $384,615.38. Thus the total
withholding with respect to the payment if Employer J elected the
flat rate with respect to the first $1,000,000, would be $384,615.38
and the total supplemental wage payment, taking into account income
tax withholding only (and not Federal Insurance Contributions Act
taxes), to B would be $1,384,615.38.
(8) For provisions relating to the treatment of wages that are not
subject to paragraph (a)(2) of this section and that are paid other
than in cash to retail commission salesmen, see Sec. 31,3402(j)-1.
(b) Special rule where aggregate withholding exemption exceeds
wages paid. (1) This rule applies only if paragraph (a)(2) of this
section does not apply to the supplemental wage payment. * * *
(2) The rules prescribed in this paragraph shall, at the election
of the employer, be applied in lieu of the rules prescribed in
paragraph (a) of this section except that this paragraph shall not be
applicable in any case in which the payroll period of the employee is
less than one week or if paragraph (a)(2) applies to the supplemental
wage payment.
* * * * *
Par. 5. Section 31.3402(j)-1 is amended by adding a new sentence at
the beginning of paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 31.3402(j)-1 Remuneration other than in cash for service
performed by retail commission salesman.
(a) * * *
(2) Section 3402(j) and this section are not applicable with
respect to wages paid to the employee that are subject to withholding
under section 31.3402(g)-1(a)(2). * * *
* * * * *
Par. 6. Section 31.3402(n)-1 is revised and the authority citation
at the end of the section is removed to read as follows:
Sec. 31.3402(n)-1 Employees incurring no income tax liability.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart (except to
the extent a payment of wages is subject to withholding under Sec.
31.3402(g)-1(a)(2)), an employer shall not deduct and withhold any tax
under chapter 24 upon a payment of wages made to an employee after
April 30, 1970, if there is in effect with respect to the payment a
withholding exemption certificate furnished to the employer by the
employee which contains statements that--
(1) The employee incurred no liability for income tax imposed under
subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code for his preceding taxable year;
and
(2) The employee anticipates that he will incur no liability for
income tax imposed under subtitle A for his current taxable year.
(b) To the extent wages are subject to withholding under Sec.
31.3402(g)-1(a)(2), such wages are subject to such income tax
withholding regardless of whether a withholding exemption certificate
under section 3402(n) and the regulations thereunder has been furnished
to the employer.
(c) For purposes of section 3402(n) and this section, an employee
is not considered to incur liability for income tax imposed under
subtitle A if the amount of such tax is equal to or less than the total
amount of credits against such tax which are allowable to him under
part iv of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code,
other than those allowable under section 31 or 39. For purposes of
seciton 3402(n) and this section, ``liability for income tax imposed
under subtitle A'' shall include
[[Page 773]]
liability for a qualified State individual income tax which is treated
pursuant to section 6361(a) as if it were imposed by chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code. An employee is not considered to incur liability
for such a State income tax if the amount of such tax does not exceed
the total amount of the credit against such tax which is allowable to
him under section 6362(b)(2)(B) or (C) or section 6362(c)(4). For
purposes of this section, an employee who files a joint return under
section 6013 is considered to incur liability for any tax shown on such
return. An employee who is entitled to file a joint return under such
section shall not certify that he anticipates that he will incur no
liability for income tax imposed by subtitle A for his current taxable
year if such statement would not be true in the event that he files a
joint return for such year, unless he filed a separate return for his
preceding taxable year and anticipates that he will file a separate
return for his current taxable year.
(d) For rules relating to invalid withholding exemption
certificates, see Sec. 31.3402(f)(2)-1(e), and for rules relating to
submission to the Internal Revenue Service of withholding exemption
certificates claiming a complete exemption from withholding, see Sec.
31.3402(f)(2)-1(g).
(e) Example 1. Employee A, an unmarried, calendar-year basis
taxpayer, files his income tax return for 1970 on April 15, 1971. A
has adjusted gross income of $1,200 and is not liable for any tax.
He had $180 of income tax withheld during 1970. A anticipates that
his gross income for 1971 will be approximately the same amount, and
that he will not incur income tax liability for that year. On April
20, 1971, A commences employment and furnishes his employer an
exemption certificate stating that he incurred no liability for
income tax imposed under subtitle A for 1970, and that he
anticipates that he will incur no liability for income tax imposed
under subtitle A for 1971. A's employer shall not deduct and
withhold on payments of wages made to A on or after April 20, 1971.
Under Sec. 31.3402(f)(4)-1(c), unless A files a new exemption
certificate with his employer, his employer is required to deduct
and withhold upon payments of wages to A made on or after May 1,
1972. Under Sec. 31.3402(f)(3)-1(b), if A had been employed by his
employer prior to April 20, 1971, and had furnished his employer a
withholding exemption certificate not containing the statements
described in Sec. 31.3402(n)-1 proir to furnishing the withholding
exemption certificate containing such statements on April 20, 1971,
his employer would not be required to give effect to the new
certificate with respect to payments of wages made by him prior to
July 1, 1971 (the first status determiantion date which occurs at
least 30 days after April 20, 1971). However his employer could, if
he chose, make the new certificate effective with respect to any
payment of wages made on or after April 20 and before July 1, 1971.
Example 2. Assume the facts are the same as in Example 1 except
that for 1970 A has taxable income of $8,000, income tax liability
of $1,630, and income tax withheld of $1,700. Although A received a
refund of $70 due to income tax withholding of $1,700, he may not
state on his exemption certificate that he incurred no liability for
income tax imposed by subtitle A for 1970.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05-71 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P