Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes, 733-735 [05-169]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. § 39.13 [Amended] List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2004– 19987; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM– 203–AD. The Proposed Amendment Comments Due Date Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive comments on this AD action by February 22, 2005. Affected ADs PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Applicability 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: (c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model 717–200 airplanes, fuselage numbers (b) None. 733 5002 through 5134 inclusive; certificated in any category. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD was prompted by reports indicating that brake fuses of the hydraulic quantity limiter of the main landing gear (MLG) have failed. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of both hydraulic and brake systems if one fuse on each hydraulic system were to fail simultaneously, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Compliance Times (f) At the applicable time in Table 1 of this AD, do the action required by paragraph (g) of this AD. TABLE 1.—COMPLIANCE TIMES For airplanes having— Compliance time (1) Less than 5,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD (2) 5,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD .. Replacement (g) Replace the eight brake fuses of the hydraulic quantity limiter by doing either Within 3,600 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD. Within 1,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD. Option 1 or Option 2 in Table 2 of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717–32A0031, dated September 10, 2004. TABLE 2.—REPLACEMENT Option— Replace eight fuses having part number (P/N) 7918282–5503 with— 1 ................... 2 ................... New fuses having P/N 7918282–5505. Modified and reidentified fuses having P/N 7918282–5505. Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717– 32A0031 refers to Parker Hanninfin Corporation Stratoflex Products Division Service Bulletin 836SD–8–6–20 Revision 1, dated June 23, 2004, as an additional source of service information for modifying and reidentifying the brakes fuses. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Parts Installation RIN 2120–AA64 (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a brake fuse, P/N 7918282–5503, on any airplane. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate jul<14>2003 16:24 Jan 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2004–19986; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–247–AD] We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 22, 2005. DATES: Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –800, and –900 Series Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: (i) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 27, 2004. Kevin M. Mullin, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 05–168 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am] Federal Aviation Administration decreasing indicated airspeed after the flightcrew set a new altitude into the autopilot. We are proposing this AD to prevent anomalous autopilot operation that produces a hazardous combination of airplane attitude and airspeed, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –800, and –900 series airplanes. This proposed AD would require installing and testing an updated version of the operational program software of the flight control computers. This proposed AD is prompted by a report of an airplane pitching up with rapidly PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. • By fax: (202) 493–2251. ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM 05JAP1 734 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at https:// dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA–2004– 19986; the directorate identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–247–AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical information: Gregg Nesemeier, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6479; fax (425) 917–6590. Plain language information: Marcia Walters, marcia.walters@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Docket Management System (DMS) The FAA has implemented new procedures for maintaining AD dockets electronically. As of May 17, 2004, new AD actions are posted on DMS and assigned a docket number. We track each action and assign a corresponding directorate identifier. The DMS AD docket number is in the form ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2004–99999.’’ The Transport Airplane Directorate identifier is in the form ‘‘Directorate Identifier 2004–NM– 999–AD.’’ Each DMS AD docket also lists the directorate identifier (‘‘Old Docket Number’’) as a cross-reference for searching purposes. Comments Invited We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 2004–19986; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–247–AD’’ in the subject line of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also VerDate jul<14>2003 16:24 Jan 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You can review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you can visit https:// dms.dot.gov. We are reviewing the writing style we currently use in regulatory documents. We are interested in your comments on whether the style of this document is clear, and your suggestions to improve the clarity of our communications that affect you. You can get more information about plain language at https://www.faa.gov/language and https:// www.plainlanguage.gov. Examining the Docket You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them. Discussion We received a report that a Boeing Model 737–700 series airplane pitched up with rapidly decreasing indicated airspeed (IAS) after the flightcrew set a new altitude into the autopilot. During the incident, the airplane was leveling from a climb at 4,000 feet when the flightcrew set the altitude select knob of the autopilot mode control panel (MCP) to continue to climb to 8,000 feet. The flight data recorder indicated that the airplane had attained a pitch attitude of 27° nose-high and an airspeed of 135 knots IAS (near or into stickshaker) before the flightcrew recovered from the pitch up. Post-flight assessment of this event revealed an anomaly in the software of the enhanced digital flight control system (EDFCS) flight control computers (FCCs); if the altitude select knob of the MCP is rotated during a 200 millisecond window between the altitude capture and altitude hold modes, a new reference altitude between the previously selected altitude and the newly selected altitude is stored as the reference. The altitude hold PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 control law then attempts to fly to this new reference altitude. This condition can result in a pitch-up to an excessive, nose-high altitude with anomalous autopilot operation that produces a hazardous combination of airplane attitude and airspeed, and if not corrected, could result in loss of control of the airplane. The EDFCS FCCs and their software on certain Model 737–600, –800, and –900 series airplanes are identical to those on the affected Model 737–700 series airplane. Therefore, all of these models may be subject to the same unsafe condition. Relevant Service Information We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–22A1164, dated May 20, 2004. The service bulletin describes procedures for installing and testing an updated version of the operational program software of the EDFCS FCCs. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is intended to adequately address the unsafe condition. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes of this same type design. Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously. Costs of Compliance There are about 155 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 34 airplanes of U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 2 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $4,420, or $130 per airplane. Authority for This Rulemaking The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM 05JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this proposed AD. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737– 600, –700, –800, and –900 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–22A1164, dated May 20, 2004. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD was prompted by a report of an airplane pitching up with rapidly decreasing indicated airspeed after the flightcrew set a new altitude into the autopilot. We are issuing this AD to prevent anomalous autopilot operation that produces a hazardous combination of airplane attitude and airspeed, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Install and Test Updated Software (f) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, install and test an updated version of the operational program software of the enhanced digital flight control system (EDFCS) flight control computers (FCCs), in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–22A1164, dated May 20, 2004. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (g) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 27, 2004. Kevin M. Mullin, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 05–169 Filed 1–4–05; 8:45 am] The Proposed Amendment BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 14 CFR Part 39 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: [Docket No. FAA–2004–19998; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–224–AD] Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2004–19986; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–247–AD. Comments Due Date (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive comments on this AD action by February 22, 2005. Affected ADs (b) None. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:24 Jan 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 Federal Aviation Administration RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 777–200 Series Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 777–200 series airplanes. This proposed AD would require replacing the pressure switches on the override/jettison fuel pumps with PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 735 new pressure switches, and replacing the ship side electrical connectors for the pressure switches on override/ jettison fuel pumps with new connectors. This proposed AD is prompted by reports that the ‘‘FUEL LOW CENTER’’ message does not activate when the fuel level in the center tank is low. We are proposing this AD to prevent the fuel pumps in the center fuel tank from running dry and becoming a potential ignition source, which could result in a fuel tank explosion. We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 22, 2005. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. • By fax: (202) 493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at https:// dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA–2004– 19998; the directorate identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–224–AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical information: Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6500; fax (425) 917–6590. Plain language information: Marcia Walters, marcia.walters@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: Docket Management System (DMS) The FAA has implemented new procedures for maintaining AD dockets electronically. As of May 17, 2004, new AD actions are posted on DMS and E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM 05JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 733-735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2004-19986; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-247-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -
900 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) 
for certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series 
airplanes. This proposed AD would require installing and testing an 
updated version of the operational program software of the flight 
control computers. This proposed AD is prompted by a report of an 
airplane pitching up with rapidly decreasing indicated airspeed after 
the flightcrew set a new altitude into the autopilot. We are proposing 
this AD to prevent anomalous autopilot operation that produces a 
hazardous combination of airplane attitude and airspeed, which could 
result in loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 22, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on 
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow 
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your 
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401, 
Washington, DC 20590.
     By fax: (202) 493-2251.

[[Page 734]]

     Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the 
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
    You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at 
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility, 
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This 
docket number is FAA-2004-19986; the directorate identifier for this 
docket is 2004-NM-247-AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Technical information: Gregg Nesemeier, Aerospace Engineer, Systems 
and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone 
(425) 917-6479; fax (425) 917-6590.
    Plain language information: Marcia Walters, marcia.walters@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Docket Management System (DMS)

    The FAA has implemented new procedures for maintaining AD dockets 
electronically. As of May 17, 2004, new AD actions are posted on DMS 
and assigned a docket number. We track each action and assign a 
corresponding directorate identifier. The DMS AD docket number is in 
the form ``Docket No. FAA-2004-99999.'' The Transport Airplane 
Directorate identifier is in the form ``Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-
999-AD.'' Each DMS AD docket also lists the directorate identifier 
(``Old Docket Number'') as a cross-reference for searching purposes.

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or 
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2004-19986; 
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-247-AD'' in the subject line of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will 
consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the 
proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will 
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA 
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of 
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our 
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or 
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, 
etc.). You can review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the 
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you 
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.
    We are reviewing the writing style we currently use in regulatory 
documents. We are interested in your comments on whether the style of 
this document is clear, and your suggestions to improve the clarity of 
our communications that affect you. You can get more information about 
plain language at https://www.faa.gov/language and https://
www.plainlanguage.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT 
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 
available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.

Discussion

    We received a report that a Boeing Model 737-700 series airplane 
pitched up with rapidly decreasing indicated airspeed (IAS) after the 
flightcrew set a new altitude into the autopilot. During the incident, 
the airplane was leveling from a climb at 4,000 feet when the 
flightcrew set the altitude select knob of the autopilot mode control 
panel (MCP) to continue to climb to 8,000 feet. The flight data 
recorder indicated that the airplane had attained a pitch attitude of 
27[deg] nose-high and an airspeed of 135 knots IAS (near or into 
stickshaker) before the flightcrew recovered from the pitch up. Post-
flight assessment of this event revealed an anomaly in the software of 
the enhanced digital flight control system (EDFCS) flight control 
computers (FCCs); if the altitude select knob of the MCP is rotated 
during a 200 millisecond window between the altitude capture and 
altitude hold modes, a new reference altitude between the previously 
selected altitude and the newly selected altitude is stored as the 
reference. The altitude hold control law then attempts to fly to this 
new reference altitude. This condition can result in a pitch-up to an 
excessive, nose-high altitude with anomalous autopilot operation that 
produces a hazardous combination of airplane attitude and airspeed, and 
if not corrected, could result in loss of control of the airplane.
    The EDFCS FCCs and their software on certain Model 737-600, -800, 
and -900 series airplanes are identical to those on the affected Model 
737-700 series airplane. Therefore, all of these models may be subject 
to the same unsafe condition.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-22A1164, dated 
May 20, 2004. The service bulletin describes procedures for installing 
and testing an updated version of the operational program software of 
the EDFCS FCCs. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service 
information is intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an 
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes 
of this same type design. Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which 
would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service 
information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 155 airplanes of the affected design in the 
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 34 airplanes of 
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 2 work hours per 
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts 
would cost about $0 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated 
cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $4,420, or $130 per 
airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is 
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106, 
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's 
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil

[[Page 735]]

aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, 
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in 
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority 
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 
develop on products identified in this proposed AD.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location 
to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new 
airworthiness directive (AD):

Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2004-19986; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-
247-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive 
comments on this AD action by February 22, 2005.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -
900 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as listed in 
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-22A1164, dated May 20, 2004.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD was prompted by a report of an airplane pitching up 
with rapidly decreasing indicated airspeed after the flightcrew set 
a new altitude into the autopilot. We are issuing this AD to prevent 
anomalous autopilot operation that produces a hazardous combination 
of airplane attitude and airspeed, which could result in loss of 
control of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Install and Test Updated Software

    (f) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, 
install and test an updated version of the operational program 
software of the enhanced digital flight control system (EDFCS) 
flight control computers (FCCs), in accordance with Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 737-22A1164, dated May 20, 2004.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has 
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in 
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 27, 2004.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-169 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.