Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Sandholdt Road Bridge Replacement, Moss Landing, California, 333-338 [05-97]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
rails for beds made of metal if sold
separately from the headboard and
footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in
which bentwood parts predominate 10;
(9) jewelry armories 11; (10) cheval
mirrors 12 (11) certain metal parts 13 (12)
mirrors that do not attach to,
incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a
dresser if they are not designed and
marketed to be sold in conjunction with
a dresser as part of a dresser-mirror set.
Imports of subject merchandise are
classified under statistical category
9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ‘‘wooden
* * * beds’’ and under statistical
category 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as
‘‘other * * * wooden furniture of a kind
used in the bedroom.’’ In addition,
wooden headboards for beds, wooden
footboards for beds, wooden side rails
for beds, and wooden canopies for beds
may also be entered under statistical
category 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as
‘‘parts of wood’’ and framed glass
mirrors may also be entered under
statistical category 7009.92.5000 of the
HTSUS as ‘‘glass mirrors * * *
framed.’’ This investigation covers all
wooden bedroom furniture meeting the
above description, regardless of tariff
classification. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise from the PRC (except for
entries of Markor International
Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacture Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Markor Tianjin’’) because this
company has a de minimis margin). We
will also instruct CBP to require cash
deposit or the posting of a bond equal
to the estimated amount by which the
normal value exceeds the U.S. price as
indicated in the chart above. These
instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice.
This order is published in accordance
with section 736(a) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.211.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) to continue to suspend
AGENCY:
10 As used herein, bentwood means solid wood
made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to
a curved shape by bending it while made pliable
with moist heat or other agency and then set by
cooling or drying. See Customs’ Headquarters’
Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976.
11 Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for
the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24″ in
width, 18″ in depth, and 49″ in height, including
a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or
felt-like material, at least one side door lined with
felt or felt-like material, with necklace hangers, and
a flip-top lid with inset mirror. See Memorandum
from Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office
Director, Issues and Decision Memorandum
Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden
Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
China dated August 31, 2004.
12 Cheval mirrors, i.e., any framed, tiltable mirror
with a height in excess of 50″ that is mounted on
a floor-standing, hinged base.
13 Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture
parts made of wood products (as defined above)
that are not otherwise specifically named in this
scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden
footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and
wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess
the essential character of wooden bedroom
furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or
unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified
in subheading 9403.90.7000, HTSUS.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: December 27, 2004.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E4–3926 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 072204A]
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Sandholdt Road
Bridge Replacement, Moss Landing,
California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of an
incidental harassment authorization.
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) as amended, notification is
hereby given that an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) has
been issued to the Monterey County
Department of Public Works (Monterey
County DPW) to take small numbers of
marine mammals, by harassment,
incidental to the replacement of the
Sandholdt Road Bridge (Bridge) in Moss
Landing, Monterey County, CA.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from April 15, 2005, through April 14,
2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application,
IHA, and/or a list of references used in
this document may be obtained by
writing to Steve Leathery, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Hollingshead, Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
333
Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–
2389, ext 128 or Monica DeAngelis,
NMFS, (562) 980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Permission may be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have no more
than a negligible impact on the species
or stock(s) and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking
are set forth. NMFS has defined
‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103
as: ‘‘an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of actions not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a
45–day time limit for NMFS review of
an application followed by a 30–day
public notice and comment period on
any proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization.
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
334
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
Summary of Request
On February 26, 2004, NMFS received
an IHA application from the California
Department of Transportation
(CALTRANS) on behalf of the Monterey
County DPW. The IHA request is for the
potential harassment of small numbers
of Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
and possibly some California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), incidental to
demolition of the current Bridge and
construction of a new Bridge.
Construction is scheduled to extend
from early to mid–2005 until the fall of
2006. A detailed description of the work
planned is contained in the CALTRANS
application and in LSA Associates, Inc.
(1999).
The County of Monterey, with
funding from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), proposes to
replace the existing one-lane Bridge
over the Moss Landing Slough.
Sandholdt Road, a two-lane county
road, carries an average of about 2700
vehicles per day between Moss Landing
Road and part of the community of
Moss Landing. The Bridge is of
unknown age with a deck replacement
having taken place over 54 years ago.
The wooden piling system has been
weakened by marine bore worms and is
decaying. The Bridge, therefore, is at the
end of its useful service life. The onelane Bridge is a traffic safety concern
and does not meet Federal standards for
rural roads, which require such bridges
to have a minimum of two traffic lanes
and safe access for pedestrians. The
Bridge does not meet structural capacity
requirements as it is incapable of
withstanding loads over minimum
highway legal loads. Further, because of
its age and dilapidated condition, the
structure is not capable of withstanding
a significant earthquake without the
possibility of incurring significant
damage that may require the Bridge to
be closed for repairs. Bridge closure may
result in significant economic impact to
the community, as the Bridge is the only
public access point to the island.
Description of the Activity
The proposed new Bridge will
improve traffic operations and safety
and provide safe access for pedestrians
and bicyclists. The following
improvements are planned: (1)
Construct a new 321–ft (98–m) long
bridge with two 12–ft (3.6–m) travel
lanes; (2) improve pedestrian safety by
constructing a 5–ft (1.5–m) sidewalk on
the north side of the new Bridge with
pedestrian lighting; (3) improve safety
for bicyclists by constructing 4–ft (1.2–
m) bicycle lanes on each side of the new
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Bridge; and (4) improve the turn radius
of the Bridge approach on the west and
the Bridge alignment with Sandholdt
Road on the east by constructing the
new Bridge 23 m (75 ft) south of the
existing structure.
The Bridge will be supported by two
bridge abutments and 3 pairs of 1.7–m
(5.6–ft) diameter columns. Each of the
columns will be supported by a Cast-InShell (CISS) pile of the same diameter.
Each CISS pile will be installed using
standard bridge construction practices.
This includes the use of a vibratory
hammer to drive the piles down into the
substrate and an impact hammer to
drive the piles the last 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in
order to determine if load capacity has
been reached.
The Bridge replacement work will
include construction of a temporary
access trestle for equipment access
during construction that includes
installation of wood pilings, installation
of temporary supporting framework
(falsework) piles, and, later, removal of
existing wood piles. The piles and
trestle deck will be installed at the same
time and the crane that drives the piles
will be mounted on the previously
constructed portion of the trestle span.
The falsework piles will be installed in
a similar manner. Construction of the
access trestle and falsework will require
a total of approximately 200 piles (0.3
to 0.6 m by 15 m (11.8 in. to 24 in. by
49 ft), wood or steel). These piles could
be installed with a vibratory hammer
and/or drop (impact) hammer. The time
to install each pile will be about 30 to
60 minutes.
Construction of the bridge span will
require 6 piles (1.7 by 31.75 m (5.6 by
104 ft)) in the slough and 12 piles (0.61
by 19.05 m (2 by 62.5 ft)) on the shore,
for the abutment foundation. These will
be the CISS piles. They will be installed
using a vibratory hammer and a drop
(impact) hammer.
A work barge will be anchored at the
Bridge site for approximately 3 months
to assist with the construction of the
temporary access trestle, which will
take about 2 weeks. It will take
approximately 2 weeks to place
embankment earthwork, four weeks to
drive the bridge piles, 3 weeks to drive
the falsework piles, and approximately
3 weeks to construct the abutments.
After the falsework is in place, the
superstructure will take approximately
36 weeks to construct.
Once the superstructure is completed,
it will take 2 weeks to remove the
falsework piles, 2 weeks to remove the
access trestle, and about 4 weeks to
remove the existing Bridge. The existing
piles will be removed from the channel
by a crane lifting and applying
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
vibration. Additional dilapidated
pilings along the adjacent shoreline will
be removed in a similar manner. These
activities will presumably take place
under a future IHA because they will
occur after the subject IHA expires.
The Monterey County DPW has
divided the work year into two seasons,
an in-water period and an out-of-water
period. In-water construction is limited
to the months of June through October,
as required by condition 15 of the
California Coastal Commission’s Coastal
Development Permit (CCC CDP). Out-ofwater construction activities are defined
as any activities located above mean
high water (MHW), which is +0.61 m
(2.0 ft) at the Sandholdt Road Bridge
site. Activities, such as pile driving, are
considered ‘‘in-water’’ regardless of the
actual tide level at the time of
construction. Certain activities,
however, are classified as both in-water
and out-of-water because some portions
of the activity take place above and
below the MHW. Most of the activities
described in this document are
considered ‘‘in-water’’ activities.
Because construction activities have the
potential to disturb harbor seals moving
to and from a haul-out site located about
500–800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south of the
Bridge along the Old Salinas River, an
IHA is warranted.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt and request for 30–
day public comment on the application
and proposed authorization was
published on August 24, 2004 (69 FR
51992). During the 30–day public
comment period, comments were
received from the Marine Mammal
Commission, Monterey County DPW
and one individual. The Commission
concurs with NMFS’ determinations
concerning the impacts of the proposed
activities on harbor seals and California
sea lions and recommends that the
authorization be granted.
Comment 1: Without providing
supporting documentation, the
individual commenter believes that the
project cannot be accomplished without
killing seals and that the pinniped
population estimates are flawed. In
addition, this person believes that seals
have few places acceptable to them to
live and this construction project will
drive them from one of these few sites.
Response: Information was provided
in the proposed IHA notice that harbor
seals are found at 400 to 500 haul-out
sites along the mainland coast and
offshore islands of California. Based on
the most recent counts, the California
stock of the Pacific harbor seal is
estimated at 27,863 (Carretta et al.,
2003) having a net annual increase of
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
approximately 3.5 percent, but are
increasing at about 7.7 percent annually
in Monterey Bay. During Bridge
construction, harbor seals will not be
killed or seriously injured, but may be
disturbed on a daily basis as they are
moving to and from the haul-out site
located about 500–800 m (1640 to 2625
ft) south of the Bridge site. Due to this
distance, no harbor seals are expected to
flush from the haul-out.
In the project area approximately 35
individuals are known to haul out along
the Old Salinas River approximately 500
to 800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south of the
current Bridge location, with more seals
generally found at about 800 m (2625 ft)
or more south of the Bridge (J. Harvey,
pers. comm). The new Bridge will not
eliminate or significantly alter haul-out
sites. Therefore, as seen at other
construction sites, although there may
be short-term abandonment of these
haul-out sites due to construction noise,
long-term abandonment is unlikely. In
addition, since these sites are not prime
locations for pupping and nursing (a
prime location is nearby in Elkhorn
Slough) and in-water work is limited to
the period from June through October, it
is highly unlikely that this project will
significantly impact harbor seals. As
California sea lions do not haul out in
this area, no impact on sea lion haulouts is likely.
Comment 2: The Monterey County
DPW had several technical corrections
to the proposed mitigation measures.
First, backup alarms are important for
public safety and, therefore, cannot be
disabled to reduce noise levels. Second,
the County does not have authority to
restrict vessel traffic in the vicinity of
the Bridge or near the pinniped haul-out
site, except to limit vessel traffic by
County staff and contractors. Therefore,
Monterey County DPW states, neither of
these mitigation measures are feasible.
Response: NMFS has not included in
the IHA a requirement to disable backup alarms and has modified the vessel
traffic restriction to vessels associated
with the construction activity itself.
Comment 3: The Monterey County
DPW recommends that the biological
monitor(s) record noise levels by noting
the types of construction equipment
being used each day and then refer to
the table provided in the CALTRANS
application (which provides the typical
noise level for each type of equipment).
Alternatively, Monterey County DPW
recommends the monitor could record
in-air noise levels with a simple decibel
meter, but it would be difficult to
standardize such measurements in a
way that would make them meaningful
(and in a way that would not interfere
with the biologist’s primary
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
responsibility of monitoring the marine
mammals).
Response: NMFS believes that in-air
noise levels produced by the
construction equipment will not cause
more than a short-term behavioral
response by the affected pinnipeds. As
a result, noting behavioral responses
made by the harbor seals to the specific
type of equipment being used at the
time will be sufficient for this activity.
Comment 4: The Monterey County
DPW requests that in-water monitoring
be restricted to the establishment of inwater buffer zone (as described later in
this document), as the cost of more
frequent underwater sound monitoring
would be prohibitive.
Response: As noted in the
CALTRANS’ application, when piledriving is started, a qualified
underwater acoustic monitor will record
sound pressure levels (SPLs) from the
pile driving to determine the distance to
the 160- and 190–dB re 1 µPa (rootmean-squared or rms) isopleths. The
measured 160–dB radius will be the
new marine mammal buffer zone and
the 190–dB radius will be the marine
mammal safety zone for that specific
type of activity. This same procedure
will be followed to establish the
appropriate buffer and safety zones for
each type of loud in-water construction
activity (e.g., impact hammer, vibratory
hammer), different hammer sizes and
types of piles (e.g., hollow steel, wood).
Alternatively, the Monterey County
DPW can conduct underwater
measurements of the loudest in-water
activity (presumably the largest impact
hammer) and use those measurements
to establish conservative buffer and
safety zones for pinnipeds.
Comment 5: Monterey County DPW
requests that the IHA have a delayed
effectiveness until April 15, 2005, when
out-of-water construction work is
scheduled to start.
Response: NMFS agrees. Early
issuance of an IHA with a delayed
effectiveness date allows a Holder of an
IHA time to incorporate marine
mammal mitigation measures into work
contracts and to establish the marine
mammal monitoring program.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals Affected by the Activity
A description of the habitat and its
associated marine mammals affected by
the proposed Bridge replacement project
can be found in the CALTRANS
application and in Monterey County
DPW Marine Mammal and Bird
Mitigation Plan (CALTRANS, 2004).
Harbor seals routinely move between
the Old Salinas River, beneath and
south of the existing Bridge, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
335
adjoining Moss Landing Harbor, on the
north side of the site. Approximately 35
individuals are known to haul out along
the Old Salinas River approximately 500
to 800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south of the
current Bridge location, with more seals
generally found at about 800 m (2625 ft)
or more south of the Bridge. California
sea lions only occasionally transit
through the project area, but are not
known to haul-out in the area.
Marine Mammals
General information on harbor seals
and other marine mammal species
found in Central California waters can
be found in Carretta et al. (2002, 2003),
which are available at the following
URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
protlres/PR2/
StocklAssessmentlProgram/
sars.html. Please refer to these
documents for information on these
species. The marine mammals likely to
be affected by work in the Bridge area
are limited to harbor seals and
California sea lions. The harbor seal and
California sea lion are the only marine
mammal species expected to be found
regularly in the Bridge area and are
described in detail below.
Harbor Seals
The California stock of harbor seals is
comprised of those seals found at the
400 to 500 haul-out sites along the
mainland coast and offshore islands of
California. Based on the most recent
counts, the California stock of the
Pacific harbor seal is estimated at 27,863
(Carretta et al., 2003). A rapid increase
in harbor seal abundance was recorded
from 1972 to 1990, but there has been
no net growth along the mainland or
Channel Islands since 1990. The annual
growth rate estimate is 3.5 percent,
however, the current rate of
reproduction is greater than this
observed rate because fishery mortality
takes a fraction of the net production
(Carretta et al., 2003).
Harbor seals are considered nonmigratory, generally making local
movements in association with the
distribution of food resources, tides,
weather, season and breeding activities
(Bigg, 1973, 1981; Stewart and Yochem,
1994). Harbor seals are found in
estuaries and marine embayments, and
typically rest ashore or haul out on
beaches and tidal-inundated habitats
such as mudflats, marshes, and nearshore rocky outcroppings (Kopec and
Harvey, 1995; Zeiner et al., 1990). They
often use these isolated, undisturbed
sites for pupping, molting, and resting.
Harbor seals are very skittish by
nature, and a startle response in harbor
seals can vary from a temporary state of
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
336
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
agitation by a few individuals to the
permanent abandonment of the haul-out
site by the entire colony. Normally,
when harbor seals are frightened by a
noise, the approach of a boat, plane,
human, predator, or another seal, for
example, they will move rapidly to the
water or flush. Disturbances have the
potential to cause a more serious effect
during pupping or nursing, or when
aggregations are dense during the
molting season, as mothers may become
separated from their pups or individuals
may be injured.
Harbor seals feed opportunistically on
a variety of fish, crustaceans, and
cephalapods (Zeiner et al., 1990).
Harbor seals are year-round residents in
the Monterey Bay area and, contrary to
the trend noted above for the stock as a
whole, Hanan et al. (1992), as reported
in Harvey (2003), report that the
Monterey Bay population is increasing
at an annual rate of approximately 7.7
percent. Within the Monterey Bay area,
there are numerous haul-out sites.
Several locations in Elkhorn Slough are
of particular importance, as they
provide the gently-sloped, isolated,
undisturbed conditions critical to
harbor seals. Within the Sandholdt Road
Bridge Replacement project vicinity,
harbor seals are known to routinely haul
out at a recently established site, located
approximately 800 m (2625 ft) south of
the Bridge, along the Old Salinas River.
This is not a location typically used by
harbor seals for pupping and nursing,
and although such activities could occur
at the site, it is considered a rare event.
Harbor seals may use the Old Salinas
River haul out during the molting
season, but it is presumed that longestablished alternative sites in this
region (i.e. along Elkhorn Slough) are
more preferable to seals during these
sensitive time periods. Bridge
construction may temporarily restrict a
small number of harbor seals from using
this haul-out site during the
construction period.
California Sea Lions
The geographic range of the U.S. stock
of the California sea lion extends from
the U.S./Mexico border north into
Canada. Breeding occurs only in the
Gulf of California, western Baja
California, and southern California.
Population estimates for this stock range
from 244,000 to 237,000. The minimum
population size is based on counts of all
age and sex classes that were ashore at
all major rookeries and haul-out sites
during the 2001 breeding season, the
number of births estimated from the pup
count, and the proportion of the pups in
the population. Current trends indicate
that the stock as a whole has been
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
growing at a rate of 5.4 to 6.1 percent
per year (Carretta et al., 2003). The
Monterey Bay population is reported to
be increasing at a slightly higher rate of
6 to 8 percent (Harvey, 2003).
California sea lions are the most
abundant pinniped in the Monterey Bay
region, with the highest numbers
occurring during the spring and fall
migrations (MBA, 1999). At least 12,000
California sea lions may be present
within the entire Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary at any one time
(Harvey, 2003), although only a few
individuals are typically present within
the Moss Landing Harbor-Sandholdt
Road Bridge Project area (S. Dearn pers.
comm.). Most of the sea lions within the
region are males of varying age classes
that arrive in early fall from their
southern breeding grounds (MBA,
1999). Many individuals remain over
the course of the winter until the
following spring, with just a few sea
lions staying through the summer. There
are no breeding areas for the California
sea lion located in the Monterey Bay
area, and most individuals migrate to
offshore breeding sites in southern
California and Mexico.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The impact to harbor seals and
California sea lions is expected to be
disturbance by the presence of workers,
construction noise, and construction
vessel traffic. The crane used to
construct the access trestle will generate
a moderate degree of noise (similar to
that of a diesel truck). Pile driving will
be noisier and will also cause ground
vibrations. Vibratory hammers usually
create less noise than pile driving, but
noise will also be created by rock drills,
other tools and also several of the
vehicles commonly used on
construction sites. The pile drivers
planned for use at the Bridge have
energy levels of approximately 16–24
kiloJoules (kJ). This is significantly less
energy than either of the pile drivers
being used on the San FranciscoOakland Bay Bridge (SF-OBB)(see 68 FR
64595, November 14, 2003), which are
500 kJ and 1700 kJ. As a result, airborne
and underwater impact zones for marine
mammals (and other estuarine life) will
be significantly smaller than at SF-OBB.
At a distance of 50 ft (15.2 m) from the
specific activity, CALTRANS believes
airborne noise levels from the pile
driver (and other construction
equipment) will not exceed 100 dBA
and most sounds will be 90 dBA or
lower at that distance. Previously,
NMFS has determined that sound
exposure levels (SELs) of 100 dBA and
90 dBA (re 20 micro-Pa2 -sec) or greater
are the levels where California sea lions
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(and northern elephant seals) and
Pacific harbor seals, respectively, will
sometimes be harassed. Pinnipeds
inside these airborne SEL isopleths at
the time of pile driving and other
equipment activity are presumed to be
harassed, whether or not an actual
behavioral disturbance occurs. NMFS
does not believe that any airborne
sounds from the Bridge construction site
are sufficient to cause Level A
harassment (injury or potential
therefor). However, harbor seals and
possibly some California sea lions may
be disturbed on a daily basis as they are
moving within the area and harbor seals
are transiting to and from the haul-out
site located about 500–800 m (1640 to
2625 ft) south of the Bridge site.
Moreover, due to the distance between
the construction site and the haul-out,
no harbor seals are expected to be
disturbed sufficiently to cause them to
flush from the haul-out.
In addition to airborne sounds, loud
underwater sounds, such as those
produced by in-water pile driving, can
have detrimental effects on marine
mammals, causing stress, changes in
behavior, and interference with
communication and predator/prey
detection. The most significant
detrimental effect that loud underwater
noises can have on marine mammals is
a temporary or permanent loss of
hearing.
Based on studies, previous piledriving projects, consultation with
experts, and review of the literature,
NMFS has determined that marine
mammals may exhibit behavioral
changes when exposed to underwater
impulse SPLs of 160 dB re 1 µPa (rms).
In addition, current NMFS policy is that
underwater SPLs at 190 dB re 1 microPa RMS (impulse) and above could
cause temporary or permanent hearing
impairment in harbor seals and sea lions
and therefore, activities should be
designed to ensure, to the greatest extent
practicable, that pinnipeds are not
exposed to SPLs greater than 190 dB dB
re 1 µPa rms.
While disturbances can consist of
head alerts, approaches to the water,
and flushes into the water, only the
latter behavior is considered by NMFS
to be Level B harassment in this
situation. During the in-water work
period (June through October), the
incidental harassment of harbor seals is
expected to occur on a daily basis upon
initiation of the work. During the out-ofwater work period, incidental
harassment of harbor seals is expected
to occur less frequently than what is
expected for in-water construction
activities. In addition, the number of
seals disturbed will vary daily
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
depending upon tidal elevations.
Although California sea lions have been
shown to react to pile driving noise by
porpoising quickly away from other
bridge construction sites (SRS
Technologies, 2001), it is not known
whether they will react to general
construction noise and move away from
the area during construction activities.
However, sea lions are generally thought
to be more tolerant of human activities
than harbor seals and are, therefore, less
likely to be affected. However, Level B
harassment of California sea lions may
occur on rare occasions during the inwater work and out-of-water work
periods.
However, disturbance from these
activities is expected to have no more
than a short-term negligible impact on
the affected species or stocks and will
result in harassment takes of small
numbers of harbor seals and sea lions.
These disturbances will be reduced to
the lowest level practicable by
implementation of the work restrictions
and mitigation measures (see
Mitigation).
Potential Effects on Habitat
The activities are expected to result in
a temporary reduction in utilization of
the Old Salinas River haulout site while
work is in progress or until seals
acclimate to the disturbance. This will
not likely result in any permanent
reduction in the number of seals at the
Old Salinas River haul out. Permanent
abandonment of the haul-out site is not
anticipated since traffic noise from the
Bridge, commercial activities along the
river front area, and recreational boating
that currently occurs within the area
have not caused long-term
abandonment. In addition, mitigation
measures and work restrictions are
designed to preclude abandonment.
Therefore, as described in detail in the
CALTRANS (2004), other than the
potential short-term abandonment by
harbor seals of part or all of the Old
Salinas River haul-out site during
Bridge construction, no impact on the
habitat or food sources of marine
mammals are likely from this
construction project.
Mitigation
Among other local, state and Federal
requirements, the Monterey County
DPW marine mammal (and bird)
mitigation plan was prepared to comply
with condition 8 of the Monterey
County Coastal Development Permit and
the CCC CDP. The access trestle and
falsework piles will be located such that
they do not pose more of a barrier to
marine mammals than do the support
structures for the existing Bridge. In
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
addition, construction barges and/or
other in-water support construction
equipment will be located in an area
that would not restrict the movements
of harbor seals or California sea lions
through the work area.
To minimize underwater noise levels,
the loudest pile-driving activities will
be restricted to low-water periods. The
loudest in-water noise levels are
expected to occur during pile driving of
the 6 large CISS piles with an impact
hammer (driving steel piles is much
louder than driving wooden piles, and
an impact hammer is much louder than
a vibratory hammer). As a result, the
following mitigation measures will
apply to pile driving: (1) for the two
CISS piles in the deeper channel area,
the impact hammer will not be used
when water depth is more than 5 ft (1.5
m); and (2) for the other 4 CISS piles,
the impact hammer will be used when
the water depth is more than 3 ft (1 m).
Several mitigation measures to reduce
the potential for general noise have been
implemented by the Monterey County
DPW as part of their activity. General
restrictions include: piles will only be
driven during daylight hours and all inwater support equipment will be located
so as not to restrict marine mammal
movement.
To minimize potential harassment of
marine mammals to the lowest level
practicable, the following mitigation
measures are also required: (1) limit all
in-water construction activity (as
described in the Marine Mammal and
Bird Mitigation Plan (Monterey County
DPW, 2004)) to the period from June 1
through October 31, and (2) minimize
Bridge construction-related vessel traffic
to the greatest extent practicable in the
in-water buffer zone (described in the
next paragraph) when conducting inwater construction activities and to the
greatest extent practicable near the haulout site.
Underwater sound measurements
have not been made for the pile driving
equipment planned for use at the
Bridge. Until the distance at which
underwater sound levels equal 160 db
and 190 dB re 1 µPa rms can be
determined and implemented, Monterey
County DPW will establish a
preliminary in-water marine mammal
impact zone, delineated by a 500–ft
(152–m) radius from the in-water
construction activity. The preliminary
in-water, 500–ft (152–m) impact zone
will be clearly marked by highly visible
stakes securely placed on the banks.
Once pile-driving has started, a
qualified underwater acoustic monitor
will record SPLs from the pile driving
to determine the distance to 160- and
190–dB re 1 µPa rms isopleths. When
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
337
these radii are established, they will
replace the 500–ft (152–m) impact zone
and will be used as the 160–dB
pinniped buffer and 190–dB pinniped
safety zones. This same procedure will
be followed to establish the appropriate
buffer and safety zones for each type of
loud in-water construction activity (e.g.,
impact hammer, vibratory hammer),
different hammer sizes and types of
piles (e.g., hollow steel, wood). The
160–dB radius will be called the
pinniped buffer zone and the 190–dB
radius will be called the pinniped safety
zone for the specific type of activity
currently underway. Alternatively,
under the IHA, the Monterey County
DPW can conduct underwater
measurements of only the loudest inwater activity (presumably the largest
impact hammer) and use those
measurements to establish conservative
buffer and safety zones for pinnipeds.
The new safety zones will be clearly
marked by highly visible stakes and the
stakes delineating the initial 500–ft
(152–m) impact zone will be removed.
Each day, before pile-driving (or other
loud in-water construction activity)
begins, the marine mammal monitor
will survey the appropriate impact,
buffer and/or safety zones for harbor
seals and California sea lions. If any
pinnipeds are sighted within the impact
or safety zones, the monitor will require
the contractor to delay pile-driving until
the monitor determines that the marine
mammal(s) has moved beyond the
impact or safety zone, either through
sighting or by waiting until enough time
has elapsed (about 15 minutes) to
assume that the animal has moved
beyond the safety zone. However, once
pile driving has begun, that individual
pile can be driven to depth without
cessation notwithstanding any pinniped
presence.
Other in-water and out-of-water
construction activities not related to pile
driving, such as the use of heavy
equipment to place embankment
earthwork and rock slope protection,
construct bridge abutments and the
superstructure, and complete the
roadway and embankment structural
section (i.e., activities not involving
loud, impulsive hammering sounds),
will generate noise levels equivalent to
that of a diesel truck. For these
activities, a 50–ft (15.2–m) radius
impact zone will be established if that
radius extends into the water. This
pinniped impact zone will be clearly
marked by highly visible stakes securely
placed into the banks.
Each day before non-pile driving
construction begins, the monitor will
search the 50–ft (15.2–m) impact zone
for marine mammals. If a marine
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
338
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
mammal is sighted within the impact
zone, the monitor will require the
contractor to delay in-water or out-ofwater construction activities until the
monitor determines that no marine
mammals are present within the impact
zone.
Monitoring
In addition to monitoring and
recording behavioral responses within
the 50–ft (15.2–m) pinniped impact
zone, the preliminary 500–ft (152–m)
pinniped impact zone, and the buffer
and safety zones, NMFS is requiring the
Monterey County DPW to monitor the
impact of Bridge replacement
construction activities on harbor seals
(and California sea lions, if present) at
the Old Salinas River haul-out site. In
addition to specific monitoring tasks
mentioned herein, all biological
monitor(s) will record general
construction activity (including all
equipment being used), location,
duration, and standardized noise levels
for the construction equipment.
Monitoring will be divided into the
in-water and out-of-water construction
periods. Monitoring will be conducted
every day during in-water construction
activities and for an 8–hour period once
a week during out-of-water activities, by
at least one trained, NMFS-approved,
biological monitor. The following data
will be recorded: (1) Number of seals
and sea lions on site; (2) date; (3) time;
(4) tidal height; (5) number of adults,
subadults, and pups; (6) number of
females and males; (7) number of
molting seals; and (8) details of any
observed disturbances. The monitor(s)
will conduct baseline observations of
pinniped behavior at the Old Salinas
River haul-out site, once a day for a
period of 5 consecutive days
immediately before the initiation of
construction in the area to establish preconstruction behavioral patterns. In
addition, NMFS requires that,
immediately following the completion
of the construction of the Bridge, the
monitor(s) will conduct observations of
pinniped behavior at the Old Salinas
River haul out, for at least 5 consecutive
days for approximately 1 tidal cycle
(high tide to high tide) each day.
Reporting
NMFS will be notified in writing
within 10 working days of any changes
to the impact, buffer and safety zones
due to completion and analysis of the
SPL measurements.
The Monterey County DPW will
provide weekly reports to the Southwest
Regional Administrator (Regional
Administrator), NMFS, including a
summary of the previous week’s
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
monitoring activities and an estimate of
the number of pinnipeds that may have
been disturbed as a result of Bridge
replacement construction activities.
These reports will provide dates, time,
tidal height, maximum number of
harbor seals ashore, number of adults,
sub-adults and pups, number of
females/males, and any observed
disturbances. The Monterey County
DPW will also provide a description of
construction activities at the time of
observation and any SPL measurements
made at the haulout site. The Monterey
County DPW must submit draft final
reports to NMFS within 90 days of
completion of the 2005 in-water work
phase and the 2005/2006 out-of-water
work phase. The draft interim reports
are considered final reports unless
NMFS requests modifications to those
reports within 90 days of receipt. The
Monterey County DPW will also provide
NMFS with a follow-up report on the
post-construction monitoring activities
within 18 months of project completion
in order to evaluate whether haulout
patterns are similar to the pre-Bridge
replacement haul-out patterns at the Old
Salinas River site.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
NMFS has determined that this action
will have no effect on species listed
under the ESA that are under the
jurisdiction of NMFS. On April 12,
2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) concurred with the
determination of the FHWA that the
proposed Bridge project was not likely
to adversely affect the federally
endangered goby (Eucyclobgobius
newberryi), the brown pelican
(Pelecanus occidentalis) and southern
sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis).
However, issuance of an IHA to the
Monterey County DPW also constitutes
an agency action subject to section 7 of
the ESA. As the effects of the Bridge
activities on listed species were
analyzed earlier, and as the action has
not changed from that considered in
that informal consultation, the
discussion of effects that is contained in
the April 12, 2000 concurrence letter
from the USFWS to the FHWA pertains
also to this action. In conclusion, NMFS
has determined that issuance of an IHA
does not lead to any effects to listed
species apart from those that were
considered in the consultation on
FHWA’s action.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS has prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) on this action and has
made a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). Therefore, preparation of an
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental impact statement on this
action is not required. A copy of the EA
and FONSI are available upon request
(see ADDRESSES).
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the Bridge
replacement, as described in this
document, should result, at worst, in the
temporary modification in behavior of
small numbers of harbor seals and,
possibly, of small numbers of California
sea lions. While behavioral
modifications, including temporarily
vacating the haulout, may be made by
these species to avoid the resultant
visual and acoustic disturbance, this
action is expected to have a negligible
impact on the affected species and
stocks of pinnipeds. In addition, no take
by injury and/or death is anticipated,
and harassment takes will be at the
lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation
measures described in this document.
Authorization
For the reasons previously discussed,
NMFS has issued an IHA for a 1–year
period, for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of harbor seals and
California sea lions incidental to Bridge
replacement construction, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: December 27, 2004.
Donna Wieting,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–97 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
The Director, Regulatory
Information Management Services,
Office of the Chief Information Officer,
invites comments on the proposed
information collection requests as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March 7,
2005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 333-338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-97]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 072204A]
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Sandholdt Road Bridge Replacement, Moss Landing, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given that an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) has been issued to the Monterey County
Department of Public Works (Monterey County DPW) to take small numbers
of marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to the replacement of the
Sandholdt Road Bridge (Bridge) in Moss Landing, Monterey County, CA.
DATES: This authorization is effective from April 15, 2005, through
April 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application, IHA, and/or a list of references
used in this document may be obtained by writing to Steve Leathery,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Hollingshead, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2389, ext 128 or Monica DeAngelis,
NMFS, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Permission may be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have
no more than a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses and that the permissible
methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and
reporting of such taking are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as: ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited
process by which citizens of the United States can apply for an
authorization to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Except for certain categories of actions not pertinent
here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
[[Page 334]]
Summary of Request
On February 26, 2004, NMFS received an IHA application from the
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) on behalf of the
Monterey County DPW. The IHA request is for the potential harassment of
small numbers of Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and possibly
some California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), incidental to
demolition of the current Bridge and construction of a new Bridge.
Construction is scheduled to extend from early to mid-2005 until the
fall of 2006. A detailed description of the work planned is contained
in the CALTRANS application and in LSA Associates, Inc. (1999).
The County of Monterey, with funding from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), proposes to replace the existing one-lane Bridge
over the Moss Landing Slough. Sandholdt Road, a two-lane county road,
carries an average of about 2700 vehicles per day between Moss Landing
Road and part of the community of Moss Landing. The Bridge is of
unknown age with a deck replacement having taken place over 54 years
ago. The wooden piling system has been weakened by marine bore worms
and is decaying. The Bridge, therefore, is at the end of its useful
service life. The one-lane Bridge is a traffic safety concern and does
not meet Federal standards for rural roads, which require such bridges
to have a minimum of two traffic lanes and safe access for pedestrians.
The Bridge does not meet structural capacity requirements as it is
incapable of withstanding loads over minimum highway legal loads.
Further, because of its age and dilapidated condition, the structure is
not capable of withstanding a significant earthquake without the
possibility of incurring significant damage that may require the Bridge
to be closed for repairs. Bridge closure may result in significant
economic impact to the community, as the Bridge is the only public
access point to the island.
Description of the Activity
The proposed new Bridge will improve traffic operations and safety
and provide safe access for pedestrians and bicyclists. The following
improvements are planned: (1) Construct a new 321-ft (98-m) long bridge
with two 12-ft (3.6-m) travel lanes; (2) improve pedestrian safety by
constructing a 5-ft (1.5-m) sidewalk on the north side of the new
Bridge with pedestrian lighting; (3) improve safety for bicyclists by
constructing 4-ft (1.2-m) bicycle lanes on each side of the new Bridge;
and (4) improve the turn radius of the Bridge approach on the west and
the Bridge alignment with Sandholdt Road on the east by constructing
the new Bridge 23 m (75 ft) south of the existing structure.
The Bridge will be supported by two bridge abutments and 3 pairs of
1.7-m (5.6-ft) diameter columns. Each of the columns will be supported
by a Cast-In-Shell (CISS) pile of the same diameter. Each CISS pile
will be installed using standard bridge construction practices. This
includes the use of a vibratory hammer to drive the piles down into the
substrate and an impact hammer to drive the piles the last 1.7 m (5.6
ft) in order to determine if load capacity has been reached.
The Bridge replacement work will include construction of a
temporary access trestle for equipment access during construction that
includes installation of wood pilings, installation of temporary
supporting framework (falsework) piles, and, later, removal of existing
wood piles. The piles and trestle deck will be installed at the same
time and the crane that drives the piles will be mounted on the
previously constructed portion of the trestle span. The falsework piles
will be installed in a similar manner. Construction of the access
trestle and falsework will require a total of approximately 200 piles
(0.3 to 0.6 m by 15 m (11.8 in. to 24 in. by 49 ft), wood or steel).
These piles could be installed with a vibratory hammer and/or drop
(impact) hammer. The time to install each pile will be about 30 to 60
minutes.
Construction of the bridge span will require 6 piles (1.7 by 31.75
m (5.6 by 104 ft)) in the slough and 12 piles (0.61 by 19.05 m (2 by
62.5 ft)) on the shore, for the abutment foundation. These will be the
CISS piles. They will be installed using a vibratory hammer and a drop
(impact) hammer.
A work barge will be anchored at the Bridge site for approximately
3 months to assist with the construction of the temporary access
trestle, which will take about 2 weeks. It will take approximately 2
weeks to place embankment earthwork, four weeks to drive the bridge
piles, 3 weeks to drive the falsework piles, and approximately 3 weeks
to construct the abutments. After the falsework is in place, the
superstructure will take approximately 36 weeks to construct.
Once the superstructure is completed, it will take 2 weeks to
remove the falsework piles, 2 weeks to remove the access trestle, and
about 4 weeks to remove the existing Bridge. The existing piles will be
removed from the channel by a crane lifting and applying vibration.
Additional dilapidated pilings along the adjacent shoreline will be
removed in a similar manner. These activities will presumably take
place under a future IHA because they will occur after the subject IHA
expires.
The Monterey County DPW has divided the work year into two seasons,
an in-water period and an out-of-water period. In-water construction is
limited to the months of June through October, as required by condition
15 of the California Coastal Commission's Coastal Development Permit
(CCC CDP). Out-of-water construction activities are defined as any
activities located above mean high water (MHW), which is +0.61 m (2.0
ft) at the Sandholdt Road Bridge site. Activities, such as pile
driving, are considered ``in-water'' regardless of the actual tide
level at the time of construction. Certain activities, however, are
classified as both in-water and out-of-water because some portions of
the activity take place above and below the MHW. Most of the activities
described in this document are considered ``in-water'' activities.
Because construction activities have the potential to disturb harbor
seals moving to and from a haul-out site located about 500-800 m (1640
to 2625 ft) south of the Bridge along the Old Salinas River, an IHA is
warranted.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt and request for 30-day public comment on the
application and proposed authorization was published on August 24, 2004
(69 FR 51992). During the 30-day public comment period, comments were
received from the Marine Mammal Commission, Monterey County DPW and one
individual. The Commission concurs with NMFS' determinations concerning
the impacts of the proposed activities on harbor seals and California
sea lions and recommends that the authorization be granted.
Comment 1: Without providing supporting documentation, the
individual commenter believes that the project cannot be accomplished
without killing seals and that the pinniped population estimates are
flawed. In addition, this person believes that seals have few places
acceptable to them to live and this construction project will drive
them from one of these few sites.
Response: Information was provided in the proposed IHA notice that
harbor seals are found at 400 to 500 haul-out sites along the mainland
coast and offshore islands of California. Based on the most recent
counts, the California stock of the Pacific harbor seal is estimated at
27,863 (Carretta et al., 2003) having a net annual increase of
[[Page 335]]
approximately 3.5 percent, but are increasing at about 7.7 percent
annually in Monterey Bay. During Bridge construction, harbor seals will
not be killed or seriously injured, but may be disturbed on a daily
basis as they are moving to and from the haul-out site located about
500-800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south of the Bridge site. Due to this
distance, no harbor seals are expected to flush from the haul-out.
In the project area approximately 35 individuals are known to haul
out along the Old Salinas River approximately 500 to 800 m (1640 to
2625 ft) south of the current Bridge location, with more seals
generally found at about 800 m (2625 ft) or more south of the Bridge
(J. Harvey, pers. comm). The new Bridge will not eliminate or
significantly alter haul-out sites. Therefore, as seen at other
construction sites, although there may be short-term abandonment of
these haul-out sites due to construction noise, long-term abandonment
is unlikely. In addition, since these sites are not prime locations for
pupping and nursing (a prime location is nearby in Elkhorn Slough) and
in-water work is limited to the period from June through October, it is
highly unlikely that this project will significantly impact harbor
seals. As California sea lions do not haul out in this area, no impact
on sea lion haul-outs is likely.
Comment 2: The Monterey County DPW had several technical
corrections to the proposed mitigation measures. First, backup alarms
are important for public safety and, therefore, cannot be disabled to
reduce noise levels. Second, the County does not have authority to
restrict vessel traffic in the vicinity of the Bridge or near the
pinniped haul-out site, except to limit vessel traffic by County staff
and contractors. Therefore, Monterey County DPW states, neither of
these mitigation measures are feasible.
Response: NMFS has not included in the IHA a requirement to disable
back-up alarms and has modified the vessel traffic restriction to
vessels associated with the construction activity itself.
Comment 3: The Monterey County DPW recommends that the biological
monitor(s) record noise levels by noting the types of construction
equipment being used each day and then refer to the table provided in
the CALTRANS application (which provides the typical noise level for
each type of equipment). Alternatively, Monterey County DPW recommends
the monitor could record in-air noise levels with a simple decibel
meter, but it would be difficult to standardize such measurements in a
way that would make them meaningful (and in a way that would not
interfere with the biologist's primary responsibility of monitoring the
marine mammals).
Response: NMFS believes that in-air noise levels produced by the
construction equipment will not cause more than a short-term behavioral
response by the affected pinnipeds. As a result, noting behavioral
responses made by the harbor seals to the specific type of equipment
being used at the time will be sufficient for this activity.
Comment 4: The Monterey County DPW requests that in-water
monitoring be restricted to the establishment of in-water buffer zone
(as described later in this document), as the cost of more frequent
underwater sound monitoring would be prohibitive.
Response: As noted in the CALTRANS' application, when pile-driving
is started, a qualified underwater acoustic monitor will record sound
pressure levels (SPLs) from the pile driving to determine the distance
to the 160- and 190-dB re 1 microPa (root-mean-squared or rms)
isopleths. The measured 160-dB radius will be the new marine mammal
buffer zone and the 190-dB radius will be the marine mammal safety zone
for that specific type of activity. This same procedure will be
followed to establish the appropriate buffer and safety zones for each
type of loud in-water construction activity (e.g., impact hammer,
vibratory hammer), different hammer sizes and types of piles (e.g.,
hollow steel, wood). Alternatively, the Monterey County DPW can conduct
underwater measurements of the loudest in-water activity (presumably
the largest impact hammer) and use those measurements to establish
conservative buffer and safety zones for pinnipeds.
Comment 5: Monterey County DPW requests that the IHA have a delayed
effectiveness until April 15, 2005, when out-of-water construction work
is scheduled to start.
Response: NMFS agrees. Early issuance of an IHA with a delayed
effectiveness date allows a Holder of an IHA time to incorporate marine
mammal mitigation measures into work contracts and to establish the
marine mammal monitoring program.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
A description of the habitat and its associated marine mammals
affected by the proposed Bridge replacement project can be found in the
CALTRANS application and in Monterey County DPW Marine Mammal and Bird
Mitigation Plan (CALTRANS, 2004). Harbor seals routinely move between
the Old Salinas River, beneath and south of the existing Bridge, and
the adjoining Moss Landing Harbor, on the north side of the site.
Approximately 35 individuals are known to haul out along the Old
Salinas River approximately 500 to 800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south of the
current Bridge location, with more seals generally found at about 800 m
(2625 ft) or more south of the Bridge. California sea lions only
occasionally transit through the project area, but are not known to
haul-out in the area.
Marine Mammals
General information on harbor seals and other marine mammal species
found in Central California waters can be found in Carretta et al.
(2002, 2003), which are available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
Please refer to these documents for information on these species. The
marine mammals likely to be affected by work in the Bridge area are
limited to harbor seals and California sea lions. The harbor seal and
California sea lion are the only marine mammal species expected to be
found regularly in the Bridge area and are described in detail below.
Harbor Seals
The California stock of harbor seals is comprised of those seals
found at the 400 to 500 haul-out sites along the mainland coast and
offshore islands of California. Based on the most recent counts, the
California stock of the Pacific harbor seal is estimated at 27,863
(Carretta et al., 2003). A rapid increase in harbor seal abundance was
recorded from 1972 to 1990, but there has been no net growth along the
mainland or Channel Islands since 1990. The annual growth rate estimate
is 3.5 percent, however, the current rate of reproduction is greater
than this observed rate because fishery mortality takes a fraction of
the net production (Carretta et al., 2003).
Harbor seals are considered non-migratory, generally making local
movements in association with the distribution of food resources,
tides, weather, season and breeding activities (Bigg, 1973, 1981;
Stewart and Yochem, 1994). Harbor seals are found in estuaries and
marine embayments, and typically rest ashore or haul out on beaches and
tidal-inundated habitats such as mudflats, marshes, and near-shore
rocky outcroppings (Kopec and Harvey, 1995; Zeiner et al., 1990). They
often use these isolated, undisturbed sites for pupping, molting, and
resting.
Harbor seals are very skittish by nature, and a startle response in
harbor seals can vary from a temporary state of
[[Page 336]]
agitation by a few individuals to the permanent abandonment of the
haul-out site by the entire colony. Normally, when harbor seals are
frightened by a noise, the approach of a boat, plane, human, predator,
or another seal, for example, they will move rapidly to the water or
flush. Disturbances have the potential to cause a more serious effect
during pupping or nursing, or when aggregations are dense during the
molting season, as mothers may become separated from their pups or
individuals may be injured.
Harbor seals feed opportunistically on a variety of fish,
crustaceans, and cephalapods (Zeiner et al., 1990). Harbor seals are
year-round residents in the Monterey Bay area and, contrary to the
trend noted above for the stock as a whole, Hanan et al. (1992), as
reported in Harvey (2003), report that the Monterey Bay population is
increasing at an annual rate of approximately 7.7 percent. Within the
Monterey Bay area, there are numerous haul-out sites. Several locations
in Elkhorn Slough are of particular importance, as they provide the
gently-sloped, isolated, undisturbed conditions critical to harbor
seals. Within the Sandholdt Road Bridge Replacement project vicinity,
harbor seals are known to routinely haul out at a recently established
site, located approximately 800 m (2625 ft) south of the Bridge, along
the Old Salinas River. This is not a location typically used by harbor
seals for pupping and nursing, and although such activities could occur
at the site, it is considered a rare event. Harbor seals may use the
Old Salinas River haul out during the molting season, but it is
presumed that long-established alternative sites in this region (i.e.
along Elkhorn Slough) are more preferable to seals during these
sensitive time periods. Bridge construction may temporarily restrict a
small number of harbor seals from using this haul-out site during the
construction period.
California Sea Lions
The geographic range of the U.S. stock of the California sea lion
extends from the U.S./Mexico border north into Canada. Breeding occurs
only in the Gulf of California, western Baja California, and southern
California. Population estimates for this stock range from 244,000 to
237,000. The minimum population size is based on counts of all age and
sex classes that were ashore at all major rookeries and haul-out sites
during the 2001 breeding season, the number of births estimated from
the pup count, and the proportion of the pups in the population.
Current trends indicate that the stock as a whole has been growing at a
rate of 5.4 to 6.1 percent per year (Carretta et al., 2003). The
Monterey Bay population is reported to be increasing at a slightly
higher rate of 6 to 8 percent (Harvey, 2003).
California sea lions are the most abundant pinniped in the Monterey
Bay region, with the highest numbers occurring during the spring and
fall migrations (MBA, 1999). At least 12,000 California sea lions may
be present within the entire Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary at
any one time (Harvey, 2003), although only a few individuals are
typically present within the Moss Landing Harbor-Sandholdt Road Bridge
Project area (S. Dearn pers. comm.). Most of the sea lions within the
region are males of varying age classes that arrive in early fall from
their southern breeding grounds (MBA, 1999). Many individuals remain
over the course of the winter until the following spring, with just a
few sea lions staying through the summer. There are no breeding areas
for the California sea lion located in the Monterey Bay area, and most
individuals migrate to offshore breeding sites in southern California
and Mexico.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The impact to harbor seals and California sea lions is expected to
be disturbance by the presence of workers, construction noise, and
construction vessel traffic. The crane used to construct the access
trestle will generate a moderate degree of noise (similar to that of a
diesel truck). Pile driving will be noisier and will also cause ground
vibrations. Vibratory hammers usually create less noise than pile
driving, but noise will also be created by rock drills, other tools and
also several of the vehicles commonly used on construction sites. The
pile drivers planned for use at the Bridge have energy levels of
approximately 16-24 kiloJoules (kJ). This is significantly less energy
than either of the pile drivers being used on the San Francisco-Oakland
Bay Bridge (SF-OBB)(see 68 FR 64595, November 14, 2003), which are 500
kJ and 1700 kJ. As a result, airborne and underwater impact zones for
marine mammals (and other estuarine life) will be significantly smaller
than at SF-OBB. At a distance of 50 ft (15.2 m) from the specific
activity, CALTRANS believes airborne noise levels from the pile driver
(and other construction equipment) will not exceed 100 dBA and most
sounds will be 90 dBA or lower at that distance. Previously, NMFS has
determined that sound exposure levels (SELs) of 100 dBA and 90 dBA (re
20 micro-Pa\2\ -sec) or greater are the levels where California sea
lions (and northern elephant seals) and Pacific harbor seals,
respectively, will sometimes be harassed. Pinnipeds inside these
airborne SEL isopleths at the time of pile driving and other equipment
activity are presumed to be harassed, whether or not an actual
behavioral disturbance occurs. NMFS does not believe that any airborne
sounds from the Bridge construction site are sufficient to cause Level
A harassment (injury or potential therefor). However, harbor seals and
possibly some California sea lions may be disturbed on a daily basis as
they are moving within the area and harbor seals are transiting to and
from the haul-out site located about 500-800 m (1640 to 2625 ft) south
of the Bridge site. Moreover, due to the distance between the
construction site and the haul-out, no harbor seals are expected to be
disturbed sufficiently to cause them to flush from the haul-out.
In addition to airborne sounds, loud underwater sounds, such as
those produced by in-water pile driving, can have detrimental effects
on marine mammals, causing stress, changes in behavior, and
interference with communication and predator/prey detection. The most
significant detrimental effect that loud underwater noises can have on
marine mammals is a temporary or permanent loss of hearing.
Based on studies, previous pile-driving projects, consultation with
experts, and review of the literature, NMFS has determined that marine
mammals may exhibit behavioral changes when exposed to underwater
impulse SPLs of 160 dB re 1 microPa (rms). In addition, current NMFS
policy is that underwater SPLs at 190 dB re 1 micro-Pa RMS (impulse)
and above could cause temporary or permanent hearing impairment in
harbor seals and sea lions and therefore, activities should be designed
to ensure, to the greatest extent practicable, that pinnipeds are not
exposed to SPLs greater than 190 dB dB re 1 microPa rms.
While disturbances can consist of head alerts, approaches to the
water, and flushes into the water, only the latter behavior is
considered by NMFS to be Level B harassment in this situation. During
the in-water work period (June through October), the incidental
harassment of harbor seals is expected to occur on a daily basis upon
initiation of the work. During the out-of-water work period, incidental
harassment of harbor seals is expected to occur less frequently than
what is expected for in-water construction activities. In addition, the
number of seals disturbed will vary daily
[[Page 337]]
depending upon tidal elevations. Although California sea lions have
been shown to react to pile driving noise by porpoising quickly away
from other bridge construction sites (SRS Technologies, 2001), it is
not known whether they will react to general construction noise and
move away from the area during construction activities. However, sea
lions are generally thought to be more tolerant of human activities
than harbor seals and are, therefore, less likely to be affected.
However, Level B harassment of California sea lions may occur on rare
occasions during the in-water work and out-of-water work periods.
However, disturbance from these activities is expected to have no
more than a short-term negligible impact on the affected species or
stocks and will result in harassment takes of small numbers of harbor
seals and sea lions. These disturbances will be reduced to the lowest
level practicable by implementation of the work restrictions and
mitigation measures (see Mitigation).
Potential Effects on Habitat
The activities are expected to result in a temporary reduction in
utilization of the Old Salinas River haulout site while work is in
progress or until seals acclimate to the disturbance. This will not
likely result in any permanent reduction in the number of seals at the
Old Salinas River haul out. Permanent abandonment of the haul-out site
is not anticipated since traffic noise from the Bridge, commercial
activities along the river front area, and recreational boating that
currently occurs within the area have not caused long-term abandonment.
In addition, mitigation measures and work restrictions are designed to
preclude abandonment. Therefore, as described in detail in the CALTRANS
(2004), other than the potential short-term abandonment by harbor seals
of part or all of the Old Salinas River haul-out site during Bridge
construction, no impact on the habitat or food sources of marine
mammals are likely from this construction project.
Mitigation
Among other local, state and Federal requirements, the Monterey
County DPW marine mammal (and bird) mitigation plan was prepared to
comply with condition 8 of the Monterey County Coastal Development
Permit and the CCC CDP. The access trestle and falsework piles will be
located such that they do not pose more of a barrier to marine mammals
than do the support structures for the existing Bridge. In addition,
construction barges and/or other in-water support construction
equipment will be located in an area that would not restrict the
movements of harbor seals or California sea lions through the work
area.
To minimize underwater noise levels, the loudest pile-driving
activities will be restricted to low-water periods. The loudest in-
water noise levels are expected to occur during pile driving of the 6
large CISS piles with an impact hammer (driving steel piles is much
louder than driving wooden piles, and an impact hammer is much louder
than a vibratory hammer). As a result, the following mitigation
measures will apply to pile driving: (1) for the two CISS piles in the
deeper channel area, the impact hammer will not be used when water
depth is more than 5 ft (1.5 m); and (2) for the other 4 CISS piles,
the impact hammer will be used when the water depth is more than 3 ft
(1 m).
Several mitigation measures to reduce the potential for general
noise have been implemented by the Monterey County DPW as part of their
activity. General restrictions include: piles will only be driven
during daylight hours and all in-water support equipment will be
located so as not to restrict marine mammal movement.
To minimize potential harassment of marine mammals to the lowest
level practicable, the following mitigation measures are also required:
(1) limit all in-water construction activity (as described in the
Marine Mammal and Bird Mitigation Plan (Monterey County DPW, 2004)) to
the period from June 1 through October 31, and (2) minimize Bridge
construction-related vessel traffic to the greatest extent practicable
in the in-water buffer zone (described in the next paragraph) when
conducting in-water construction activities and to the greatest extent
practicable near the haul-out site.
Underwater sound measurements have not been made for the pile
driving equipment planned for use at the Bridge. Until the distance at
which underwater sound levels equal 160 db and 190 dB re 1 microPa rms
can be determined and implemented, Monterey County DPW will establish a
preliminary in-water marine mammal impact zone, delineated by a 500-ft
(152-m) radius from the in-water construction activity. The preliminary
in-water, 500-ft (152-m) impact zone will be clearly marked by highly
visible stakes securely placed on the banks.
Once pile-driving has started, a qualified underwater acoustic
monitor will record SPLs from the pile driving to determine the
distance to 160- and 190-dB re 1 microPa rms isopleths. When these
radii are established, they will replace the 500-ft (152-m) impact zone
and will be used as the 160-dB pinniped buffer and 190-dB pinniped
safety zones. This same procedure will be followed to establish the
appropriate buffer and safety zones for each type of loud in-water
construction activity (e.g., impact hammer, vibratory hammer),
different hammer sizes and types of piles (e.g., hollow steel, wood).
The 160-dB radius will be called the pinniped buffer zone and the 190-
dB radius will be called the pinniped safety zone for the specific type
of activity currently underway. Alternatively, under the IHA, the
Monterey County DPW can conduct underwater measurements of only the
loudest in-water activity (presumably the largest impact hammer) and
use those measurements to establish conservative buffer and safety
zones for pinnipeds. The new safety zones will be clearly marked by
highly visible stakes and the stakes delineating the initial 500-ft
(152-m) impact zone will be removed.
Each day, before pile-driving (or other loud in-water construction
activity) begins, the marine mammal monitor will survey the appropriate
impact, buffer and/or safety zones for harbor seals and California sea
lions. If any pinnipeds are sighted within the impact or safety zones,
the monitor will require the contractor to delay pile-driving until the
monitor determines that the marine mammal(s) has moved beyond the
impact or safety zone, either through sighting or by waiting until
enough time has elapsed (about 15 minutes) to assume that the animal
has moved beyond the safety zone. However, once pile driving has begun,
that individual pile can be driven to depth without cessation
notwithstanding any pinniped presence.
Other in-water and out-of-water construction activities not related
to pile driving, such as the use of heavy equipment to place embankment
earthwork and rock slope protection, construct bridge abutments and the
superstructure, and complete the roadway and embankment structural
section (i.e., activities not involving loud, impulsive hammering
sounds), will generate noise levels equivalent to that of a diesel
truck. For these activities, a 50-ft (15.2-m) radius impact zone will
be established if that radius extends into the water. This pinniped
impact zone will be clearly marked by highly visible stakes securely
placed into the banks.
Each day before non-pile driving construction begins, the monitor
will search the 50-ft (15.2-m) impact zone for marine mammals. If a
marine
[[Page 338]]
mammal is sighted within the impact zone, the monitor will require the
contractor to delay in-water or out-of-water construction activities
until the monitor determines that no marine mammals are present within
the impact zone.
Monitoring
In addition to monitoring and recording behavioral responses within
the 50-ft (15.2-m) pinniped impact zone, the preliminary 500-ft (152-m)
pinniped impact zone, and the buffer and safety zones, NMFS is
requiring the Monterey County DPW to monitor the impact of Bridge
replacement construction activities on harbor seals (and California sea
lions, if present) at the Old Salinas River haul-out site. In addition
to specific monitoring tasks mentioned herein, all biological
monitor(s) will record general construction activity (including all
equipment being used), location, duration, and standardized noise
levels for the construction equipment.
Monitoring will be divided into the in-water and out-of-water
construction periods. Monitoring will be conducted every day during in-
water construction activities and for an 8-hour period once a week
during out-of-water activities, by at least one trained, NMFS-approved,
biological monitor. The following data will be recorded: (1) Number of
seals and sea lions on site; (2) date; (3) time; (4) tidal height; (5)
number of adults, subadults, and pups; (6) number of females and males;
(7) number of molting seals; and (8) details of any observed
disturbances. The monitor(s) will conduct baseline observations of
pinniped behavior at the Old Salinas River haul-out site, once a day
for a period of 5 consecutive days immediately before the initiation of
construction in the area to establish pre-construction behavioral
patterns. In addition, NMFS requires that, immediately following the
completion of the construction of the Bridge, the monitor(s) will
conduct observations of pinniped behavior at the Old Salinas River haul
out, for at least 5 consecutive days for approximately 1 tidal cycle
(high tide to high tide) each day.
Reporting
NMFS will be notified in writing within 10 working days of any
changes to the impact, buffer and safety zones due to completion and
analysis of the SPL measurements.
The Monterey County DPW will provide weekly reports to the
Southwest Regional Administrator (Regional Administrator), NMFS,
including a summary of the previous week's monitoring activities and an
estimate of the number of pinnipeds that may have been disturbed as a
result of Bridge replacement construction activities. These reports
will provide dates, time, tidal height, maximum number of harbor seals
ashore, number of adults, sub-adults and pups, number of females/males,
and any observed disturbances. The Monterey County DPW will also
provide a description of construction activities at the time of
observation and any SPL measurements made at the haulout site. The
Monterey County DPW must submit draft final reports to NMFS within 90
days of completion of the 2005 in-water work phase and the 2005/2006
out-of-water work phase. The draft interim reports are considered final
reports unless NMFS requests modifications to those reports within 90
days of receipt. The Monterey County DPW will also provide NMFS with a
follow-up report on the post-construction monitoring activities within
18 months of project completion in order to evaluate whether haulout
patterns are similar to the pre-Bridge replacement haul-out patterns at
the Old Salinas River site.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
NMFS has determined that this action will have no effect on species
listed under the ESA that are under the jurisdiction of NMFS. On April
12, 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) concurred with the
determination of the FHWA that the proposed Bridge project was not
likely to adversely affect the federally endangered goby
(Eucyclobgobius newberryi), the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis)
and southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis). However, issuance of an
IHA to the Monterey County DPW also constitutes an agency action
subject to section 7 of the ESA. As the effects of the Bridge
activities on listed species were analyzed earlier, and as the action
has not changed from that considered in that informal consultation, the
discussion of effects that is contained in the April 12, 2000
concurrence letter from the USFWS to the FHWA pertains also to this
action. In conclusion, NMFS has determined that issuance of an IHA does
not lead to any effects to listed species apart from those that were
considered in the consultation on FHWA's action.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) on this action
and has made a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Therefore,
preparation of an environmental impact statement on this action is not
required. A copy of the EA and FONSI are available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the Bridge replacement, as described in
this document, should result, at worst, in the temporary modification
in behavior of small numbers of harbor seals and, possibly, of small
numbers of California sea lions. While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the haulout, may be made by these
species to avoid the resultant visual and acoustic disturbance, this
action is expected to have a negligible impact on the affected species
and stocks of pinnipeds. In addition, no take by injury and/or death is
anticipated, and harassment takes will be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation measures described
in this document.
Authorization
For the reasons previously discussed, NMFS has issued an IHA for a
1-year period, for the incidental harassment of small numbers of harbor
seals and California sea lions incidental to Bridge replacement
construction, provided the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring,
and reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: December 27, 2004.
Donna Wieting,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-97 Filed 1-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S