General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Disputes and Appeals, 298-299 [05-82]
Download as PDF
298
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 36
Claims, Fraud, Penalties.
Dated: December 28, 2004.
Eugene W. Hickok,
Deputy Secretary of Education.
PART 36—ADJUSTMENT OF CIVIL
MONETARY PENALTIES FOR
INFLATION
1. The authority citation for part 36
continues to read as follows:
I
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Secretary amends part 36
in title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
I
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note and 31
U.S.C. 3701 note, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 36.2 is amended by revising
Table I to read as follows:
I
§ 36.2
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number does not apply)
*
Penalty adjustment.
*
*
*
*
TABLE I, SECTION 36.2.—CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS
New maximum (and
minimum, if applicable)
penalty amount
Statute
Description
20 U.S.C. 1015(c)(5) .................
Provides for a fine of up to $25,000 for failure by an institution of higher education
(IHE) to provide information on the cost of higher education to the Commissioner
of Education Statistics.
Provides for a fine of up to $25,000 for failure by an IHE to provide information to
the State and the public regarding its teacher-preparation programs.
Provides for a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for violations by lenders and guaranty
agencies of Title IV–B of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA),
which authorizes the Federal Family Education Loan Program.
Provides for a civil penalty of up to $25,000. for an institution of higher education’s
violation of Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, which authorizes various programs of student financial assistance.
Provides for a civil penalty of $10,000 to $100,000 for recipients of Government
grants, contracts, etc. that lobby Congress or the Executive Branch with respect to
the award of Government grants and contracts.
Provides for a civil penalty of up to $5,000. for false claims and statements made to
the Government.
20 U.S.C. 1027(f)(3) ..................
20 U.S.C. 1082(g) .....................
20 U.S.C. 1094(c)(3)(B) ............
31 U.S.C. 1352(c)(1) and
(c)(2)(A).
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(1) and (a)(2)
*
*
*
*
*
(VIR), Room 4035, GS Building,
Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501–4225,
for information pertaining to status or
publication schedules. For clarification
of content, contact Mr. Ernest Woodson,
Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501–
3775. Please cite Amendment 2004–05,
GSAR case 2004–G501 (Change 13).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 05–100 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 533 and 552
GSAR Amendment 2004–05; GSAR Case
2004–G501 (Change 13)
RIN 3090–AH98
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Disputes and
Appeals
General Services
Administration (GSA), Office of the
Chief Acquisition Officer.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is amending the
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to add a
clause that supplements the Disputes
clause in the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (see 48 CFR Chapter 1).
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Laurieann Duarte, Regulatory Secretariat
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:29 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
A. Background
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Subpart 33.2 (48 CFR subpart 33.2)
implements the requirements of the
Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as
amended (41 U.S.C. 601–613) (the Act),
which establishes procedures and
requirements for asserting and resolving
claims subject to the Act. It is the
Government’s policy to resolve all
contractual issues in controversy by
mutual agreement at the contracting
officer level. The Act provides for
Agencies Boards of Contract Appeals
(Boards) and the United States Court of
Federal Claims (Court) to resolve
appeals of a contracting officer’s
decision. However, the Boards and
Court do not have authority to interpret
tariffs or tariff-related matters
established through public hearings in
each jurisdiction for regulated utilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$27,500.
$27,500.
$27,500.
$27,500.
$11,000 to $110,000.
$5,500.
The authority pertaining to these
matters lie with state public utility
commissions.
A proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register at 69 FR 40730, July 6,
2004. No comments were received from
the public.
FAR section 33.215 requires that the
clause 52.233–1, Disputes, be inserted
in all solicitations and contracts, except
those with a foreign government or
agency of that government, or an
international organization or subsidiary
body of that organization, if the agency
head determines that the application of
the Act to the contract would not be in
the public interest. GSA’s Public
Buildings Service awards contracts for
public utility services. From time-totime, disputes may arise from those
contracts that involve tariffs and tariffrelated matters. This rule provides for a
supplement to FAR 52.233–1, Disputes,
allowing for such disputes to be subject
to the jurisdiction and regulation of the
utility rate commission having
jurisdiction. This rule also provides
GSA contracting officers and
contractors, acting under a utility
service contract, with specific guidance
regarding the resolution of disputes
E:\FR\FM\04JAR1.SGM
04JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
involving tariffs and tariff-related
matters.
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under Section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The General Services Administration
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the majority of small entities
that are in the industry were established
as a result of deregulation and are not
subject to the utility rate commissions.
Also, this is intended to be a
clarification of existing law, not a
substantive change. A Final Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analysis was, therefore,
not performed.
PART 552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. Add section 552.233–71 to read as
follows:
I
552.233–71
Disputes (Utility Contracts).
As prescribed in 533.215, insert the
following clause:
DISPUTES (UTILITY CONTRACTS) (JAN
2005)
The requirements of the Disputes clause at
FAR 52.233–1 are supplemented to provide
that matters involving the interpretation of
tariffed retail rates, tariff rate schedules, and
tariffed terms provided under this contract
are subject to the jurisdiction and regulation
of the utility rate commission having
jurisdiction.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 05–82 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–S
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
GSAR do not impose recordkeeping or
information collection requirements, or
otherwise collect information from
offerors, contractors, or members of the
public that require approval of the
Office of Management and Budget under
44 U.S.C.3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 533 and
552
Government procurement.
Dated: December 27, 2004.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the
Chief Acquisition Officer.
Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR parts
533 and 552 as set forth below:
I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 533 and 552 continues to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
PART 533—PROTESTS, DISPUTES,
AND APPEALS
2. Add section 533.215 to read as
follows:
I
533.215
Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 552.233–71,
Disputes (Utility Contracts), in
solicitations and contracts for utility
services subject to the jurisdiction and
regulation of a utility rate commission.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:29 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19939]
RIN 2127–AI54
Tire Safety Information; Technical
Amendment
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
technical amendment to the Federal
motor vehicle safety standard (FMVSS)
No. 119, New pneumatic tires for
vehicles other than passenger cars.
Specifically, the amendment changes
the metric value of tire speed restriction
threshold from 88 km/h (55 mph) to 90
km/h (55 mph). The amendment will
make FMVSS No. 119 more consistent
with established tire industry protocol
and labeling technology, without
making any substantive changes to the
standard.
DATES: This rule is effective February 3,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
legal issues: Mr. George Feygin, Office
of Chief Counsel (telephone: (202) 366–
2992) (Fax: (202) 366–3820); NHTSA,
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. For technical issues: Mr. Joseph
Scott, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards, (telephone: (202) 366–2720)
(Fax: (202) 366–7002); NHTSA, 400 7th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
299
FMVSS
No. 119 specifies performance
requirements for tires used on motor
vehicles other than passenger cars, and
requires certain markings on tires to
facilitate proper selection and use.
S6.5(e) requires that a tire be marked
with a speed restriction information if
the maximum speed is below 88 km/h
(55 mph). Further, Table III contains a
reference to speed-restricted tires with
the maximum speed of 88 km/h (55
mph).
Within the tire industry, the metric
value of the tire speed restriction
threshold is 90 km/h instead of 88 km/
h. Also, the English value of the tire
speed restriction threshold is sometimes
listed at 56 mph, instead of 55 mph. The
industry uses speed rating symbols to
differentiate among the tires with
various maximum speed capabilities.
The speed symbol of ‘‘G’’ is associated
with tires with a maximum speed of 90
km/h. The discrepancy between 88 km/
h and 90 km/h, as well as 55 mph and
56 mph is the result of using different
methods of converting the English speed
measurements to the metric system and
vice versa.
The Tire and Rim Association Inc.,
has petitioned NHTSA to change the
speed restriction threshold from 88 km/
h to 90 km/h and from 55 mph to 56
mph. They argued that this change
would make FMVSS No. 119 more
consistent with established tire industry
protocol and labeling technology, and
would facilitate international
harmonization.
The agency decided to amend only
the metric value of tire speed restriction
threshold from 88 km/h to 90 km/h. The
English value will remain at 55 mph
because we found that majority of tire
industry literature lists the speed
restriction threshold at 55 mph (90 km/
h) instead of 56 mph (90 km/h).1 Thus,
55 mph appears to be generally accepted
within the industry.
We believe that the discrepancy
between the metric values of the speed
restriction threshold currently used by
the agency and the one used by the
majority of industry publications result
from different methods of converting 55
mph to km/h. We note that the change
from 88 km/h to 90 km/h will have no
substantive practical effect on FMVSS
No. 119 because the difference between
the two values is so insignificant.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See 2004 Year Book; The Tire and Rim
Association, Inc., at page 3–06. The Japan
Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association, Inc.
(JATMA), the European Tyre and Rim Technical
Organization (ETRTO), and the Scandinavian Tire
& Rim Organization (STRO) also rely on 90 km/h
as the speed restriction threshold.
E:\FR\FM\04JAR1.SGM
04JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 298-299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-82]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 533 and 552
GSAR Amendment 2004-05; GSAR Case 2004-G501 (Change 13)
RIN 3090-AH98
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Disputes
and Appeals
AGENCIES: General Services Administration (GSA), Office of the Chief
Acquisition Officer.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to add a
clause that supplements the Disputes clause in the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (see 48 CFR Chapter 1).
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurieann Duarte, Regulatory
Secretariat (VIR), Room 4035, GS Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202)
501-4225, for information pertaining to status or publication
schedules. For clarification of content, contact Mr. Ernest Woodson,
Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-3775. Please cite Amendment 2004-05,
GSAR case 2004-G501 (Change 13).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 33.2 (48 CFR subpart
33.2) implements the requirements of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978,
as amended (41 U.S.C. 601-613) (the Act), which establishes procedures
and requirements for asserting and resolving claims subject to the Act.
It is the Government's policy to resolve all contractual issues in
controversy by mutual agreement at the contracting officer level. The
Act provides for Agencies Boards of Contract Appeals (Boards) and the
United States Court of Federal Claims (Court) to resolve appeals of a
contracting officer's decision. However, the Boards and Court do not
have authority to interpret tariffs or tariff-related matters
established through public hearings in each jurisdiction for regulated
utilities. The authority pertaining to these matters lie with state
public utility commissions.
A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register at 69 FR
40730, July 6, 2004. No comments were received from the public.
FAR section 33.215 requires that the clause 52.233-1, Disputes, be
inserted in all solicitations and contracts, except those with a
foreign government or agency of that government, or an international
organization or subsidiary body of that organization, if the agency
head determines that the application of the Act to the contract would
not be in the public interest. GSA's Public Buildings Service awards
contracts for public utility services. From time-to-time, disputes may
arise from those contracts that involve tariffs and tariff-related
matters. This rule provides for a supplement to FAR 52.233-1, Disputes,
allowing for such disputes to be subject to the jurisdiction and
regulation of the utility rate commission having jurisdiction. This
rule also provides GSA contracting officers and contractors, acting
under a utility service contract, with specific guidance regarding the
resolution of disputes
[[Page 299]]
involving tariffs and tariff-related matters.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The General Services Administration certifies that this final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the majority of small entities that are in
the industry were established as a result of deregulation and are not
subject to the utility rate commissions. Also, this is intended to be a
clarification of existing law, not a substantive change. A Final
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis was, therefore, not performed.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the GSAR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection
requirements, or otherwise collect information from offerors,
contractors, or members of the public that require approval of the
Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C.3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 533 and 552
Government procurement.
Dated: December 27, 2004.
David A. Drabkin,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer.
0
Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR parts 533 and 552 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 533 and 552 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
PART 533--PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS
0
2. Add section 533.215 to read as follows:
533.215 Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 552.233-71, Disputes (Utility Contracts), in
solicitations and contracts for utility services subject to the
jurisdiction and regulation of a utility rate commission.
PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
3. Add section 552.233-71 to read as follows:
552.233-71 Disputes (Utility Contracts).
As prescribed in 533.215, insert the following clause:
DISPUTES (UTILITY CONTRACTS) (JAN 2005)
The requirements of the Disputes clause at FAR 52.233-1 are
supplemented to provide that matters involving the interpretation of
tariffed retail rates, tariff rate schedules, and tariffed terms
provided under this contract are subject to the jurisdiction and
regulation of the utility rate commission having jurisdiction.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 05-82 Filed 1-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-S