Draft Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised Comprehensive Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Yosemite National Park, Tuolumne, Mariposa, and Madera Counties, CA; Notice of Availability, 382-384 [05-47]
Download as PDF
382
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
because of disagreement over possible
environmental effects. In addition to
consulting NPS resource specialists,
within and outside the Seashore, park
managers consulted federal, state and
local agencies about management issues
of concern.
The beginning of public scoping was
announced on May 4, 2002, at a public
meeting of the Point Reyes National
Seashore Citizens Advisory Commission
with a presentation on the NNDMP
planning process. In this meeting, input
on non-native deer management issues
of concern and range of alternatives was
solicited from the public. The public
meeting featured a short presentation by
the Seashore wildlife biologist on the
environmental planning process,
background on non-native deer, and
issues of importance to park
management. Background informational
handouts were provided. Members of
the Citizen’s Advisory Committee for
Point Reyes National Seashore and
Golden Gates National Recreation Area
were given the opportunity to ask
questions of park staff. Five individuals
spoke at the public meeting. A sign-up
sheet at the public meeting provided an
opportunity for members of the public
to be included on a mailing list for
upcoming information on the
management plan in development.
Public comments were accepted in
letter or email form from May 4, 2002
until July 5, 2002. All those who sent
written comments during the scoping
period and included a return mailing
address were also put on the mailing
list. An acknowledgment of the
Seashore’s receipt of written comments,
in postcard form, was also sent to those
who wrote letters. A similar e-mail
message was sent back to those who
emailed comments. A total of 32 written
comments were received by the close of
the public comment period. The major
themes communicated by the public
during the May 4, 2002 meeting and the
subsequent scoping period
encompassed a range, from a desire to
retain non-native deer in the park or to
use non-lethal deer control techniques,
to concern about impacts to natural
resources from non-native deer and a
desire to eliminate all non-native deer
from the Seashore.
Commenting on the Draft EIS: The
purpose of the management plan is to
define management prescriptions for
non-native deer. A public workshop on
the proposed NNDMP will be held
during late winter 2005 at the Point
Reyes National Seashore Red Barn
meeting (confirmed date and other
workshop details will be advertised by
direct mailing to 210 individuals and
organizations) and a notice placed in the
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
local newspapers. All interested
individuals, organizations, and agencies
will be encouraged to provide
comments, suggestions, and relevant
information (earlier scoping comments
need not be resubmitted); written
comments must be postmarked not later
than 60 days following publication in
the Federal Register by EPA of their
notice of filing of the availability of the
Draft EIS (as soon as this date can be
confirmed it will be announced on the
park’s website, and included in the
workshop mailing). Questions at this
time regarding the NNDMP planning
process or work shop should be
addressed to the Superintendent either
by mail (see address below) or by
telephone at (415) 663–8522. Please
note that names and addresses of people
who comment become part of the public
record. If individuals commenting
request that their name and/or address
be withheld from public disclosure, it
will be honored to the extent allowable
by law. Such requests must be stated
prominently in the beginning of the
comments. There also may be
circumstances wherein the NPS
withholds from the record a
respondent’s identity, as allowable by
law. As always: the NPS will make
available to public inspection all
submissions from organizations or
businesses and from persons identifying
themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations and
businesses; and, anonymous comments
may not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Draft EIS may
be obtained from the Superintendent,
Point Reyes National Seashore, Point
Reyes, CA 94956, Attn: NNDMP, or by
e-mail request to: Ann_Nelson@nps.gov
(in the subject line, type: NNDMP). The
document will be sent directly to those
who have requested it, and also posted
on the Internet at the park’s Web page
(https://www.nps.gov/pore/pphtml/
documents.html.); and both the printed
document and digital version on
compact disk will be available at the
park headquarters and local libraries.
Decision: Following careful analysis
of public and agency comment on the
Draft EIS, it is anticipated at this time
that the final EIS would be available in
fall of 2005. As a delegated EIS, the
official responsible for the final decision
is the Regional Director, Pacific West
Region. A Record of Decision would not
be signed sooner than 30 days following
release of the Final EIS; notice of the
decision will be posted in the Federal
Register and announced in local and
regional newspapers. Following
approval of the Non-Native Deer
Management Plan, the official
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
responsible for implementation will be
the Superintendent, Point Reyes
National Seashore.
Dated: December 17, 2004.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 05–48 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft Merced Wild and Scenic River
Revised Comprehensive Management
Plan and Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement, Yosemite National
Park, Tuolumne, Mariposa, and Madera
Counties, CA; Notice of Availability
Summary—Pursuant to section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as
amended), the Council of
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR Part 1500), and the Wild and
Scenic Rivers Act (as amended, 16
U.S.C. 1271), the National Park Service,
Department of the Interior, has prepared
the Draft Merced Wild and Scenic River
Revised Comprehensive Management
Plan and Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (Draft Revised Merced
River Plan/SEIS). It is intended to
amend and supplement the Merced
Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement
(Merced River Plan/FEIS) released in
June 2000. The Draft Revised Merced
River Plan/SEIS identifies and evaluates
four alternatives for guiding
management of the Merced Wild and
Scenic River in Yosemite National Park.
When approved, the plan will serve as
a template for all future decisions
relating to recreation and land use
within Yosemite’s 81-mile Merced River
corridor. The primary goals of the plan
are to ensure the free-flowing condition
of the river, along with providing longterm protection and enhancement of
what the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
calls the river’s ‘‘Outstandingly
Remarkable Values’’—the unique
qualities that make the river worthy of
special protection.
Purpose and Need for Federal
Action—The Merced River Plan is the
official document for guiding future
management of the main stem and
South Fork of the Merced Wild and
Scenic River within the jurisdiction of
Yosemite National Park. In August 2000,
the Merced River Plan/FEIS was
approved and signed in a Record of
Decision (subsequently revised in
November 2000). Shortly after the
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
Record of Decision was signed, the plan
became the subject of a lengthy
litigation process. In April 2004, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit directed the National Park
Service (NPS) to prepare a ‘‘new or
revised’’ comprehensive management
plan that addresses two deficiencies
identified in the Court’s October 27,
2003 opinion (Friends of Yosemite
Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 803 9th
Cir. 2003). The Court ruled that: (1) The
revised plan must implement a user
capacity program that presents specific
measurable limits on use, and (2) the
revised plan must reassess the river
corridor boundary in the El Portal
Administrative Site based on the
location of Outstandingly Remarkable
Values. The purpose of the
programmatic guidance identified
herein is to revise and supplement the
Merced River Plan/FEIS and the park’s
1980 General Management Plan. This
supplemental environmental impact
statement represents NPS compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act, as well as parallel compliance with
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 1271) and National
Historic Preservation Act.
Proposed Plan and Alternatives—As
the proposed Revised Merced River
Plan, Alternative 2 (agency preferred
alternative) would include all of the
elements of the No Action Alternative,
with the addition of implementing the
Visitor Experience Resource Protection
(VERP) user capacity component, along
with interim limits on some park
facilities; the El Portal segment
boundary would be redrawn based on
the location of the Outstandingly
Remarkable Values identified within a
quarter-mile of the river. In addition to
this proposed plan, the Draft Revised
Merced River Plan/SEIS identifies and
analyzes three other alternatives:
Alternative 1—No Action; Alternative
3—Quotas by Segment with VERP; and
Alternative 4—Quotas by Management
Zone with VERP. Alternative 2 has also
been deemed to be the
‘‘environmentally preferred’’ alternative.
The No Action Alternative
(Alternative 1) represents a baseline on
which to compare the three action
alternatives. Under this alternative, the
Merced River Plan—as signed in the
2000 Record of Decision (and
subsequent revision)—would continue
to guide management in the river
corridor. Application of its management
elements (boundaries, classifications,
Outstandingly Remarkable Values,
management zoning, River Protection
Overlay, Section 7 determination
process) would continue as presented in
the plan. However, implementation of
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
the Visitor Experience Resource
Protection (VERP) framework would not
be in place and the park would continue
managing user capacity under existing
programs and policies outlined in the
February 2004 User Capacity Program
for the Merced Wild and Scenic River
Corridor. This program includes
continuation of the current wilderness
management program and existing
Trailhead Quota System. This
alternative would implement the narrow
boundary for the El Portal segment as
described in the selected alternative of
the Merced River Plan/FEIS (100-year
floodplain or River Protection Overlay
[whichever is greater] along with
adjacent wetlands).
Alternative 3 would also include all
of the elements from the No Action
alternative, in addition to a VERP user
capacity component (as described in
Alternative 2) along with a maximum
daily quota for each river segment and
an annual visitation cap; the El Portal
segment would have the maximum
quarter-mile boundary.
Alternative 4 would contain the
elements of No Action in addition to a
VERP user capacity component (as
described in Alternative 2) along with
quotas for each river management zone
and an annual visitation cap; the El
Portal segment boundary would be
drawn according to the location of
Outstandingly Remarkable Values.
Scoping History—On July 27, 2004, a
Notice of Intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement was
published in the Federal Register
initiating a 30-day scoping period—in
response to public comment, this
scoping period was extended to
September 10, 2004. During scoping, a
series of public meetings were held. A
letter from the Superintendent was sent
to over 8,000 interested members of the
public on the park’s Planning Mailing
list, encouraging them to submit ideas,
issues, and concerns relating to the
scope of this planning effort. In
addition, the scoping period and
associated public meetings were
publicized via regional media, on the
park’s Web site, through e-mailed
notices on the park’s electronic
newsletter, and on various state-wide
online bulletin boards. As a result of
outreach, over 100 letters, faxes, and
emails were received and considered
during the development of this Draft
Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS. All
written scoping comments, as well as
oral comments at public meetings, can
be viewed on the park’s Web site
(https://www.nps.gov/yose/planning). A
scoping report is also available.
Comments—Upon its release, the
Draft Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
383
will be mailed directly to those who
requested the document in response to
a December 2004 direct mail and emailed solicitation. While the public
will be encouraged to view the
document on the park’s Web site
(https://www.nps.gov/yose/planning), it
will be made available in a printed
version, as well as on CD ROM. Copies
will be available at park headquarters
and the main Visitor Center in Yosemite
Valley, the Administrative Complex in
El Portal, and at local and regional
libraries throughout California.
Written comments must be submitted
in writing and postmarked no later than
60 days after the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of filing of the Draft Revised Merced
River Plan/SEIS in the Federal Register
(anticipated to occur in mid-January,
2005; as soon as this date is confirmed
it will be announced on the park’s Web
site). All comments should be addressed
to the Superintendent, ATTN: Draft
Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS, P.O.
Box 577, Yosemite National Park, CA
95389. Also, comments can be e-mailed
to yose_planning@nps.gov or faxed to
(209) 379–1294. All comments received
will be available for public review in the
Yosemite Research Library and also may
be available on the park’s Web site. To
request a printed copy or CD ROM, refer
to the information above or phone (209)
379–1365.
Individuals submitting comments
may request that their name and/or
address be withheld from public
disclosure, and such requests will be
honored to the extent allowable by law.
Requests must be stated prominently in
the beginning of comments. There also
may be circumstances wherein the NPS
will withhold a respondent’s identity as
allowable by law. As always, the
National Park Service will make
available to public inspection all
submissions from organizations or
businesses and from persons identifying
themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations and
businesses. Anonymous comments will
not be considered.
Public Meetings—In order to facilitate
public review and comment on the Draft
Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS, the
NPS intends to host public meetings in
the following California towns and
cities: San Francisco, Sacramento,
Groveland, Merced, Mammoth, Los
Angeles, Fresno, Oakhurst, Mariposa, El
Portal, and Yosemite Valley. Meeting
dates will be dependent on the
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, and will occur after the first 15
days of the comment period and no later
than 15 days prior to the comment
period closing. A schedule of dates,
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
384
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Notices
locations, and times will be announced
via a mailing to the park’s Planning
Mailing List, a news release, through the
park’s electronic newsletter, and
postings on the park’s Web site
(https://www.nps.gov/yose/planning) and
other statewide online bulletin boards.
Participants are encouraged to review
the document prior to attending a
meeting. Yosemite National Park
management and planning team
members will attend all sessions to
present the Draft Revised Merced River
Plan/SEIS, to receive oral and written
comments, and to answer questions. All
meeting locations will be accessible for
disabled persons and a sign language
interpreter may be available upon
request with prior notice (contact the
park as noted above under
‘‘Comments’’).
Decision Process—Depending on the
degree of public interest and response
from other agencies and organizations,
at this time it is anticipated that the
Final Merced Wild and Scenic River
Revised Comprehensive Management
Plan and Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (Final Merced River
Plan/SEIS) will be completed during
June 2005; availability of the document
will be duly noted in the Federal
Register. Subsequently, notice of an
approved Record of Decision would be
published in the Federal Register not
sooner than 30 days after the final
document is distributed. This is
expected to occur in mid-August 2005.
As a delegated EIS, the official
responsible for the decision is the
Regional Director, Pacific West Region,
National Park Service; the official
responsible for implementation is the
Superintendent, Yosemite National
Park.
Dated: December 14, 2004.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 05–47 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
Dated: December 15, 2004.
Michael B. Murray,
Acting Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 05–45 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BILLING CODE 4312–52–M
National Park Service
Cape Cod National Seashore, South
Wellfleet, MA; Cape Code National
Seashore Advisory Commission; Two
Hundred Fifty-First Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770, 5
U.S.C. App 1, Section 10), that a
meeting of the Cape Code National
Seashore Advisory Commission will be
held on February 14, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:02 Jan 03, 2005
The Commission was reestablished
pursuant to Pub. L. 87–126 as amended
by Pub. L. 105–280. The purpose of the
Commission is to consult with the
Secretary of the Interior, or his designee,
with respect to matters relating to the
development of Cape Cod National
Seashore, and with respect to carrying
out the provisions of sections 4 and 5
of the Act establishing the Seashore.
The Commission members will meet
at 1 p.m. at Headquarters, Marconi
Station, Wellfleet, Massachusetts for the
regular business meeting to discuss the
following:
1. Adoption of Agenda
2. Approval of Minutes of Previous
Meeting (December 6, 2004)
3. Reports of Officers
4. Reports of Subcommittees
5. Superintendent’s Report
Update on Salt Pond Visitor Center
Project
Update on Highlands Center Project
Update on Hunting EIS
Update on Dune Shack Issue
Update on Proposed Herring River
Restoration Project
News from Washington
6. Old Business
7. New Business
Pleasant Bay Discussion
8. Date and agenda for next meeting
9. Public comment and
10. Adjournment
The meeting is open to the public. It
is expected that 15 persons will be able
to attend the meeting in addition to
Commission members.
Interested persons may make oral/
written presentations to the Commission
during the business meeting or file
written statement. Such requests should
be made to the park superintendent at
least seven days prior to the meeting.
Further information concerning the
meeting may be obtained from the
Superintendent, Cape Cod National
Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road,
Wellfleet, MA 02667.
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
in the National Register were received
by the National Park Service before
December 11, 2004. Pursuant to section
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written
comments concerning the significance
of these properties under the National
Register criteria for evaluation may be
forwarded by United States Postal
Service, to the National Register of
Historic Places, National Park Service,
1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC
20240; by all other carriers, National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service,1201 Eye St., NW., 8th
floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax,
202–371–6447. Written or faxed
comments should be submitted by
January 19, 2005.
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register of Historic
Places.
ALABAMA
Baldwin County
Foley Downtown Historic District, Parts of
Alston, N & S McZenzie, AL 98, E & W
Laurel, Myrtle, Rose, and W. Orange,
Foley, 04001496
Butler County
Greenville Downtown Historic District
(Boundary Increase), (Greenville MRA),
Roughly Adams, Bolling, Caldwell,
Church, Commerce, Conecuh, Few and
Walnut Sts., Greenville, 04001497
ARKANSAS
Ashley County
Greenview Cafe, 3rd Ave. and Arkansas St.,
Crossett, 04001507
Benton County
Illinois River Bridge, (Historic Bridges of
Arkansas MPS), Cty Rd. 196 (Kincheloe
Rd.) approx. 0.25 S of old AR 68, Pedro,
04001503
Railroad Cottage, 208 N. Rust, Gentry,
04001509
Springfield to Fayetteville Road—Cross
Hollow Segment, (Cherokee Trail of Tears
MPS), Benton Cty Rd. 83 through Cross
Hollow, Lowell, 04001511
Springfield to Fayetteville Road—Brightwater
Segment, (Cherokee Trail of Tears MPS), N
Old Wire Rd./Benton Cty Rd. 67, S of U.S.
62, Brightwater, 04001513
Boone County
Evans—Kirby House, 611 S. Pine St.,
Harrison, 04001505
Clark County
Peake High School, 1600 Caddo St.,
Arkadelphia, 04001499
Clay County
County Home Cemetery, 3010 Heritage Park
Rd., Piggott, 04001495
Craighead County
Mercantile Bank Building, 249 S. Main St.,
Jonesboro, 04001506
Desha County
Lewis, Jay, House, 12 Fairview Dr., McGehee,
04001501
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 382-384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-47]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised Comprehensive
Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,
Yosemite National Park, Tuolumne, Mariposa, and Madera Counties, CA;
Notice of Availability
Summary--Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended), the
Council of Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Part 1500), and
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1271), the
National Park Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared the
Draft Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised Comprehensive Management
Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Revised
Merced River Plan/SEIS). It is intended to amend and supplement the
Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement (Merced River Plan/FEIS) released in
June 2000. The Draft Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS identifies and
evaluates four alternatives for guiding management of the Merced Wild
and Scenic River in Yosemite National Park. When approved, the plan
will serve as a template for all future decisions relating to
recreation and land use within Yosemite's 81-mile Merced River
corridor. The primary goals of the plan are to ensure the free-flowing
condition of the river, along with providing long-term protection and
enhancement of what the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act calls the river's
``Outstandingly Remarkable Values''--the unique qualities that make the
river worthy of special protection.
Purpose and Need for Federal Action--The Merced River Plan is the
official document for guiding future management of the main stem and
South Fork of the Merced Wild and Scenic River within the jurisdiction
of Yosemite National Park. In August 2000, the Merced River Plan/FEIS
was approved and signed in a Record of Decision (subsequently revised
in November 2000). Shortly after the
[[Page 383]]
Record of Decision was signed, the plan became the subject of a lengthy
litigation process. In April 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit directed the National Park Service (NPS) to prepare a
``new or revised'' comprehensive management plan that addresses two
deficiencies identified in the Court's October 27, 2003 opinion
(Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 803 9th Cir.
2003). The Court ruled that: (1) The revised plan must implement a user
capacity program that presents specific measurable limits on use, and
(2) the revised plan must reassess the river corridor boundary in the
El Portal Administrative Site based on the location of Outstandingly
Remarkable Values. The purpose of the programmatic guidance identified
herein is to revise and supplement the Merced River Plan/FEIS and the
park's 1980 General Management Plan. This supplemental environmental
impact statement represents NPS compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act, as well as parallel compliance with the Wild
and Scenic Rivers Act (as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1271) and National
Historic Preservation Act.
Proposed Plan and Alternatives--As the proposed Revised Merced
River Plan, Alternative 2 (agency preferred alternative) would include
all of the elements of the No Action Alternative, with the addition of
implementing the Visitor Experience Resource Protection (VERP) user
capacity component, along with interim limits on some park facilities;
the El Portal segment boundary would be redrawn based on the location
of the Outstandingly Remarkable Values identified within a quarter-mile
of the river. In addition to this proposed plan, the Draft Revised
Merced River Plan/SEIS identifies and analyzes three other
alternatives: Alternative 1--No Action; Alternative 3--Quotas by
Segment with VERP; and Alternative 4--Quotas by Management Zone with
VERP. Alternative 2 has also been deemed to be the ``environmentally
preferred'' alternative.
The No Action Alternative (Alternative 1) represents a baseline on
which to compare the three action alternatives. Under this alternative,
the Merced River Plan--as signed in the 2000 Record of Decision (and
subsequent revision)--would continue to guide management in the river
corridor. Application of its management elements (boundaries,
classifications, Outstandingly Remarkable Values, management zoning,
River Protection Overlay, Section 7 determination process) would
continue as presented in the plan. However, implementation of the
Visitor Experience Resource Protection (VERP) framework would not be in
place and the park would continue managing user capacity under existing
programs and policies outlined in the February 2004 User Capacity
Program for the Merced Wild and Scenic River Corridor. This program
includes continuation of the current wilderness management program and
existing Trailhead Quota System. This alternative would implement the
narrow boundary for the El Portal segment as described in the selected
alternative of the Merced River Plan/FEIS (100-year floodplain or River
Protection Overlay [whichever is greater] along with adjacent
wetlands).
Alternative 3 would also include all of the elements from the No
Action alternative, in addition to a VERP user capacity component (as
described in Alternative 2) along with a maximum daily quota for each
river segment and an annual visitation cap; the El Portal segment would
have the maximum quarter-mile boundary.
Alternative 4 would contain the elements of No Action in addition
to a VERP user capacity component (as described in Alternative 2) along
with quotas for each river management zone and an annual visitation
cap; the El Portal segment boundary would be drawn according to the
location of Outstandingly Remarkable Values.
Scoping History--On July 27, 2004, a Notice of Intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement was published in the Federal Register
initiating a 30-day scoping period--in response to public comment, this
scoping period was extended to September 10, 2004. During scoping, a
series of public meetings were held. A letter from the Superintendent
was sent to over 8,000 interested members of the public on the park's
Planning Mailing list, encouraging them to submit ideas, issues, and
concerns relating to the scope of this planning effort. In addition,
the scoping period and associated public meetings were publicized via
regional media, on the park's Web site, through e-mailed notices on the
park's electronic newsletter, and on various state-wide online bulletin
boards. As a result of outreach, over 100 letters, faxes, and emails
were received and considered during the development of this Draft
Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS. All written scoping comments, as well
as oral comments at public meetings, can be viewed on the park's Web
site (https://www.nps.gov/yose/planning). A scoping report is also
available.
Comments--Upon its release, the Draft Revised Merced River Plan/
SEIS will be mailed directly to those who requested the document in
response to a December 2004 direct mail and e-mailed solicitation.
While the public will be encouraged to view the document on the park's
Web site (https://www.nps.gov/yose/planning), it will be made available
in a printed version, as well as on CD ROM. Copies will be available at
park headquarters and the main Visitor Center in Yosemite Valley, the
Administrative Complex in El Portal, and at local and regional
libraries throughout California.
Written comments must be submitted in writing and postmarked no
later than 60 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes
the notice of filing of the Draft Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS in the
Federal Register (anticipated to occur in mid-January, 2005; as soon as
this date is confirmed it will be announced on the park's Web site).
All comments should be addressed to the Superintendent, ATTN: Draft
Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS, P.O. Box 577, Yosemite National Park,
CA 95389. Also, comments can be e-mailed to yose_planning@nps.gov or
faxed to (209) 379-1294. All comments received will be available for
public review in the Yosemite Research Library and also may be
available on the park's Web site. To request a printed copy or CD ROM,
refer to the information above or phone (209) 379-1365.
Individuals submitting comments may request that their name and/or
address be withheld from public disclosure, and such requests will be
honored to the extent allowable by law. Requests must be stated
prominently in the beginning of comments. There also may be
circumstances wherein the NPS will withhold a respondent's identity as
allowable by law. As always, the National Park Service will make
available to public inspection all submissions from organizations or
businesses and from persons identifying themselves as representatives
or officials of organizations and businesses. Anonymous comments will
not be considered.
Public Meetings--In order to facilitate public review and comment
on the Draft Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS, the NPS intends to host
public meetings in the following California towns and cities: San
Francisco, Sacramento, Groveland, Merced, Mammoth, Los Angeles, Fresno,
Oakhurst, Mariposa, El Portal, and Yosemite Valley. Meeting dates will
be dependent on the publication of this notice in the Federal Register,
and will occur after the first 15 days of the comment period and no
later than 15 days prior to the comment period closing. A schedule of
dates,
[[Page 384]]
locations, and times will be announced via a mailing to the park's
Planning Mailing List, a news release, through the park's electronic
newsletter, and postings on the park's Web site (https://www.nps.gov/
yose/planning) and other statewide online bulletin boards.
Participants are encouraged to review the document prior to
attending a meeting. Yosemite National Park management and planning
team members will attend all sessions to present the Draft Revised
Merced River Plan/SEIS, to receive oral and written comments, and to
answer questions. All meeting locations will be accessible for disabled
persons and a sign language interpreter may be available upon request
with prior notice (contact the park as noted above under ``Comments'').
Decision Process--Depending on the degree of public interest and
response from other agencies and organizations, at this time it is
anticipated that the Final Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised
Comprehensive Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (Final Merced River Plan/SEIS) will be completed during June
2005; availability of the document will be duly noted in the Federal
Register. Subsequently, notice of an approved Record of Decision would
be published in the Federal Register not sooner than 30 days after the
final document is distributed. This is expected to occur in mid-August
2005. As a delegated EIS, the official responsible for the decision is
the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, National Park Service; the
official responsible for implementation is the Superintendent, Yosemite
National Park.
Dated: December 14, 2004.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 05-47 Filed 1-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FY-P