Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Seasonal Closure of Grammanik Bank, 300-301 [04-28749]
Download as PDF
300
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
In consideration of the foregoing, this
document amends the CFR by changing
the metric value of tire speed restriction
threshold in S6.5(e) and Table III from
88 km/h to 90 km/h.
This technical amendment will not
impose or relax any substantive
requirements or burdens on
manufacturers. Therefore, NHTSA finds
for good cause that any notice and
opportunity for comment on these
correcting amendments are not
necessary.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571
Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tires.
I 49 CFR part 571 is amended by making
the following technical amendment:
PART 571—[CORRECTED]
1. The authority citation continues to
read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 2011, 30115,
30166 and 30177; delegation of authority at
49 CFR 1.50.
2. Section 571.119 is amended by
revising paragraph S6.5(e) to read as
follows; and amending Table III, under
the column ‘‘Description’’, by revising
‘‘88 km/h’’ to read ‘‘90 km/h’’.
I
§ 571.119 New pneumatic tires for vehicles
other than passenger cars.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The speed restriction of the tire, if
90 km/h (55 mph) or less, shown as
follows:
Max speed l km/h (lmph).
*
*
*
*
*
Issued: December 20, 2004.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 05–41 Filed 1–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 041104307–4356–02; I.D.
102904B]
RIN 0648–AS56
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands; Seasonal Closure of
Grammanik Bank
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:29 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this temporary
final rule to implement interim
measures recommended by the
Caribbean Fishery Management Council
(Council). This rule prohibits fishing for
or possessing any species of fish, except
highly migratory species, within the
Grammanik Bank closed area on a
temporary basis (see DATES). The
intended effect of this rule is to protect
a yellowfin grouper spawning
aggregation and to reduce overfishing.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective February 1, 2005, through
April 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents
supporting this action may be obtained
from NMFS, Southeast Regional Office,
9721 Executive Center Drive N., St.
Petersburg, FL 33702.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Kimmel, 727–570–5752.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef
fish fishery of Puerto Rico and of the
U.S. Virgin Islands is managed under
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and of
the U.S. Virgin Islands (FMP). The FMP
was prepared by the Council and is
implemented under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations
at 50 CFR part 622.
On November 16, 2004, NMFS
published a proposed rule (69 FR
67104) to implement the interim
measures specified in this temporary
final rule as requested by the Caribbean
Fishery Management Council for
Grammanik Bank and to request
comments on the proposed actions. The
rationale for the interim measures is
provided in the preamble to the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No public comments were received
during the comment period on the
proposed rule. Therefore, the proposed
rule is adopted as final.
Classification
50 CFR Part 622
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Administrator, Southeast Region,
NMFS, determined that the interim
measures that this temporary final rule
implements are necessary for the
conservation and management of the
yellowfin grouper fishery in the
Caribbean and that they are consistent
with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
other applicable laws.
This temporary final rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA). The FRFA
incorporates the initial regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a
summary of the analyses completed to
support the action. No public comments
were received on the economic impacts
of this rule. A summary of the analysis
follows.
The rule is intended to protect an
important spawning aggregation of
yellowfin grouper, to help arrest the
decline in the resource, and to support
its recovery. The Magnuson-Stevens
Act, as amended, provides the statutory
basis for the rule.
The rule is intended to implement, on
an interim basis, an action currently
included in the draft Sustainable
Fisheries Act (SFA) Amendment. The
SFA Amendment is expected to be
implemented prior to the 2006 fishing
year. This rule will be an interim action
providing protection to an important
yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation
during the 2005 spawning season and
will expire prior to the implementation
of the SFA Amendment. No duplicate,
overlapping, or conflicting rules have
been identified.
No issues were raised by public
comments in response to the IRFA.
Therefore, no changes were made in the
FRFA.
There are two general classes of small
business entities that will be directly
affected by the rule: commercial fishing
vessels and for-hire fishing vessels. The
Small Business Administration defines
a small business that engages in
commercial fishing as a firm that is
independently owned and operated,
that is not dominant in its field of
operation, and that has annual receipts
up to $3.5 million per year. The revenue
benchmark for a small business that
engages in charter fishing is a firm with
receipts up to $6.0 million.
There are an estimated 342 registered
commercial fishing vessels in the U.S.
Virgin Islands. The majority of
participants are part-time fishermen.
Total annual average dockside revenues
from commercial fishing activity are
estimated at $1.72 million, or an average
of $5,000 per registered vessel. Given
the average revenue estimates of the
fleet, all commercial entities are
determined to be small business
entities. It cannot be precisely
determined how many of the
commercial vessels that operate in the
U.S. Virgin Islands would be affected by
the rule, though the rule will apply to
all commercial fishing vessels. NMFS
assumes that indirect impacts would be
incurred industry-wide, and that all the
commercial fishing entities that will be
affected by the rule are small entities.
An estimated 27 year-round charter
fishing operations operate in the U.S.
Virgin Islands, with an unknown
E:\FR\FM\04JAR1.SGM
04JAR1
301
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
number of seasonal operations. No
information exists on the business
profile of this fleet. However, the
average gross revenue for charter vessels
operating in Florida is estimated at
$68,000, and ranges from $26,000
(South Carolina) to $82,000 (Alabama)
for other areas in the southeastern
United States. No information exists to
suggest the revenue profile of charter
vessels operating in the U.S. Virgin
Islands is substantially different from
these estimates, so NMFS concludes
that all charter vessels operating in the
U.S. Virgin Islands are small business
entities. It cannot be determined how
many of the charter vessels that operate
in the U.S. Virgin Islands will be
affected by the rule, though the rule will
apply to all charter vessels. NMFS
assumes that indirect effects will be
incurred industry-wide, and that all the
charter fishing entities that will be
affected by the rule are small entities.
The rule does not impose any
reporting or recordkeeping
requirements.
No precise estimates of the profits of
either the commercial fishing vessels or
the charter vessels that are expected to
be affected by the rule are available.
However, even though not all water
habitat is equally productive, the rule
will affect only approximately 3 percent
of the available water area in the less
than 100–fathom (183–m) depth range
and close the area to fishing for only 25
percent of the year. Thus, less than 1
percent of available fishing area and
time will be affected. Although harvests
from this area during this time period
will likely exceed 1 percent because it
is a spawning site, the restriction is
expected to be sufficiently small so as
to not significantly affect the profits of
a substantial number of small entities.
Including the no-action alternative
(Alternative 1), five alternatives were
considered in addition to the rule (that
is, the preferred Alternative 2). The noaction alternative and Alternatives 3
through 6 provided insufficient
spawning protection or failed to
minimize the significant economic
impacts on small entities. The no-action
alternative would not impose any
closure in the target area, thereby
allowing all current fishing practices.
This would eliminate all short-term
adverse impacts expected to result from
the closure. However, spawning
protection of yellowfin grouper would
not be provided, thereby forgoing the
benefits of rebuilding the stock, and the
action would, therefore, not be
consistent with the Council’s intent.
The remaining four alternatives differ in
the geographic size and time duration of
the closure. Alternative 3 would
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:29 Jan 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
establish closure over a larger
geographic area than the rule, 17.5 nm2
(60 km2) vs. 6.88 nm2 (28.60 km2), but
would not encompass the entire period
during which yellowfin grouper are
known to spawn, thereby potentially
negating the purpose and effectiveness
of the closure. Alternatives 4 and 6
would only establish closure in a 1 nm2
(3.4 km2) area, an area insufficient to
afford the necessary protection.
Alternative 4 would additionally not
encompass the full spawning period and
may allow fishing pressure to
significantly impact an aggregation that
is still present in the latter half of April.
Alternative 6 would encompass the
entire spawning period, but would
continue the closure longer than is
believed necessary. Alternative 5 would
encompass 5 nm2 (17.2 km2), an area
smaller than that in Alternative 2 but
possibly affording sufficient geographic
scope. However, Alternative 5 would
also extend the closure for an additional
month, which is longer than necessary
and would, therefore, impose
unnecessary adverse impacts.
Among the alternatives, only the
preferred action (i.e., this rule) meets
the geographic and temporal scope
necessary to meet the management
objectives. The fishing restriction
described in the preferred action will
affect less than 1 percent of available
fishing area and time and therefore is
expected to be sufficiently small so as
to not significantly affect the profits of
a substantial number of small entities. A
copy of this analysis is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as small entity
compliance guide (the guide) was
prepared. Copies of this final rule are
available from the Southeast Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES), and the guide,
i.e., permit holder letter, will be sent to
all holders of permits for the reef fish
fishery. The guide and this final rule
will be available upon request.
Dated: December 28, 2004.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
50 CFR part 622 is amended as follows:
I
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.33, paragraph (a)(4) is added
to read as follows:
I
§ 622.33 Caribbean EEZ seasonal and/or
area closures.
(a) * * *
(4) Grammanik Bank closed area. (i)
The Grammanik Bank closed area is
bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in
order, the following points:
Point
North lat.
A
18°12.40′
64°59.00′
B
18°10.00′
64°59.00′
C
18°10.00′
64°56.10′
D
18°12.40′
64°56.10′
A
18°12.40′
64°59.00′
(ii) From February 1, 2005, through
April 30, 2005, no person may fish for
or possess any species of fish, except
highly migratory species, within the
Grammanik Bank closed area. For the
purpose of paragraph (a)(4) of this
section, ‘‘fish’’ means finfish, mollusks,
crustaceans, and all other forms of
marine animal and plant life other than
marine mammals and birds. ‘‘Highly
migratory species’’ means bluefin,
bigeye, yellowfin, albacore, and skipjack
tunas; swordfish; sharks (listed in
appendix A to 50 CFR part 635); white
marlin, blue marlin, sailfish, and
longbill spearfish.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 04–28749 Filed 12–29–04; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
West long.
E:\FR\FM\04JAR1.SGM
04JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 300-301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28749]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 041104307-4356-02; I.D. 102904B]
RIN 0648-AS56
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Seasonal
Closure of Grammanik Bank
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this temporary final rule to implement interim
measures recommended by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council
(Council). This rule prohibits fishing for or possessing any species of
fish, except highly migratory species, within the Grammanik Bank closed
area on a temporary basis (see DATES). The intended effect of this rule
is to protect a yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation and to reduce
overfishing.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective February 1, 2005, through
April 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents supporting this action may be obtained
from NMFS, Southeast Regional Office, 9721 Executive Center Drive N.,
St. Petersburg, FL 33702.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Kimmel, 727-570-5752.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef fish fishery of Puerto Rico and of
the U.S. Virgin Islands is managed under the Fishery Management Plan
for the Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and of the U.S. Virgin Islands
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the Council and is implemented under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
On November 16, 2004, NMFS published a proposed rule (69 FR 67104)
to implement the interim measures specified in this temporary final
rule as requested by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council for
Grammanik Bank and to request comments on the proposed actions. The
rationale for the interim measures is provided in the preamble to the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No public comments were
received during the comment period on the proposed rule. Therefore, the
proposed rule is adopted as final.
Classification
The Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS, determined that the
interim measures that this temporary final rule implements are
necessary for the conservation and management of the yellowfin grouper
fishery in the Caribbean and that they are consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
This temporary final rule has been determined to be not significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA). The
FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA)
and a summary of the analyses completed to support the action. No
public comments were received on the economic impacts of this rule. A
summary of the analysis follows.
The rule is intended to protect an important spawning aggregation
of yellowfin grouper, to help arrest the decline in the resource, and
to support its recovery. The Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended, provides
the statutory basis for the rule.
The rule is intended to implement, on an interim basis, an action
currently included in the draft Sustainable Fisheries Act (SFA)
Amendment. The SFA Amendment is expected to be implemented prior to the
2006 fishing year. This rule will be an interim action providing
protection to an important yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation
during the 2005 spawning season and will expire prior to the
implementation of the SFA Amendment. No duplicate, overlapping, or
conflicting rules have been identified.
No issues were raised by public comments in response to the IRFA.
Therefore, no changes were made in the FRFA.
There are two general classes of small business entities that will
be directly affected by the rule: commercial fishing vessels and for-
hire fishing vessels. The Small Business Administration defines a small
business that engages in commercial fishing as a firm that is
independently owned and operated, that is not dominant in its field of
operation, and that has annual receipts up to $3.5 million per year.
The revenue benchmark for a small business that engages in charter
fishing is a firm with receipts up to $6.0 million.
There are an estimated 342 registered commercial fishing vessels in
the U.S. Virgin Islands. The majority of participants are part-time
fishermen. Total annual average dockside revenues from commercial
fishing activity are estimated at $1.72 million, or an average of
$5,000 per registered vessel. Given the average revenue estimates of
the fleet, all commercial entities are determined to be small business
entities. It cannot be precisely determined how many of the commercial
vessels that operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands would be affected by
the rule, though the rule will apply to all commercial fishing vessels.
NMFS assumes that indirect impacts would be incurred industry-wide, and
that all the commercial fishing entities that will be affected by the
rule are small entities.
An estimated 27 year-round charter fishing operations operate in
the U.S. Virgin Islands, with an unknown
[[Page 301]]
number of seasonal operations. No information exists on the business
profile of this fleet. However, the average gross revenue for charter
vessels operating in Florida is estimated at $68,000, and ranges from
$26,000 (South Carolina) to $82,000 (Alabama) for other areas in the
southeastern United States. No information exists to suggest the
revenue profile of charter vessels operating in the U.S. Virgin Islands
is substantially different from these estimates, so NMFS concludes that
all charter vessels operating in the U.S. Virgin Islands are small
business entities. It cannot be determined how many of the charter
vessels that operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands will be affected by the
rule, though the rule will apply to all charter vessels. NMFS assumes
that indirect effects will be incurred industry-wide, and that all the
charter fishing entities that will be affected by the rule are small
entities.
The rule does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping
requirements.
No precise estimates of the profits of either the commercial
fishing vessels or the charter vessels that are expected to be affected
by the rule are available. However, even though not all water habitat
is equally productive, the rule will affect only approximately 3
percent of the available water area in the less than 100-fathom (183-m)
depth range and close the area to fishing for only 25 percent of the
year. Thus, less than 1 percent of available fishing area and time will
be affected. Although harvests from this area during this time period
will likely exceed 1 percent because it is a spawning site, the
restriction is expected to be sufficiently small so as to not
significantly affect the profits of a substantial number of small
entities.
Including the no-action alternative (Alternative 1), five
alternatives were considered in addition to the rule (that is, the
preferred Alternative 2). The no-action alternative and Alternatives 3
through 6 provided insufficient spawning protection or failed to
minimize the significant economic impacts on small entities. The no-
action alternative would not impose any closure in the target area,
thereby allowing all current fishing practices. This would eliminate
all short-term adverse impacts expected to result from the closure.
However, spawning protection of yellowfin grouper would not be
provided, thereby forgoing the benefits of rebuilding the stock, and
the action would, therefore, not be consistent with the Council's
intent. The remaining four alternatives differ in the geographic size
and time duration of the closure. Alternative 3 would establish closure
over a larger geographic area than the rule, 17.5 nm\2\ (60 km\2\) vs.
6.88 nm\2\ (28.60 km\2\), but would not encompass the entire period
during which yellowfin grouper are known to spawn, thereby potentially
negating the purpose and effectiveness of the closure. Alternatives 4
and 6 would only establish closure in a 1 nm\2\ (3.4 km\2\) area, an
area insufficient to afford the necessary protection. Alternative 4
would additionally not encompass the full spawning period and may allow
fishing pressure to significantly impact an aggregation that is still
present in the latter half of April. Alternative 6 would encompass the
entire spawning period, but would continue the closure longer than is
believed necessary. Alternative 5 would encompass 5 nm\2\ (17.2 km\2\),
an area smaller than that in Alternative 2 but possibly affording
sufficient geographic scope. However, Alternative 5 would also extend
the closure for an additional month, which is longer than necessary and
would, therefore, impose unnecessary adverse impacts.
Among the alternatives, only the preferred action (i.e., this rule)
meets the geographic and temporal scope necessary to meet the
management objectives. The fishing restriction described in the
preferred action will affect less than 1 percent of available fishing
area and time and therefore is expected to be sufficiently small so as
to not significantly affect the profits of a substantial number of
small entities. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as
small entity compliance guide (the guide) was prepared. Copies of this
final rule are available from the Southeast Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES), and the guide, i.e., permit holder letter, will be sent to
all holders of permits for the reef fish fishery. The guide and this
final rule will be available upon request.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 28, 2004.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended as
follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 622.33, paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.33 Caribbean EEZ seasonal and/or area closures.
(a) * * *
(4) Grammanik Bank closed area. (i) The Grammanik Bank closed area
is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point North lat. West long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 18[deg]12.40' 64[deg]59.00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B 18[deg]10.00' 64[deg]59.00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C 18[deg]10.00' 64[deg]56.10'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
D 18[deg]12.40' 64[deg]56.10'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 18[deg]12.40' 64[deg]59.00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) From February 1, 2005, through April 30, 2005, no person may
fish for or possess any species of fish, except highly migratory
species, within the Grammanik Bank closed area. For the purpose of
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, ``fish'' means finfish, mollusks,
crustaceans, and all other forms of marine animal and plant life other
than marine mammals and birds. ``Highly migratory species'' means
bluefin, bigeye, yellowfin, albacore, and skipjack tunas; swordfish;
sharks (listed in appendix A to 50 CFR part 635); white marlin, blue
marlin, sailfish, and longbill spearfish.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 04-28749 Filed 12-29-04; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S