Search and Track the Federal Register
Department or Agency:
Show:
Regulations Filed: All Dates
Between and
Full Text (optional):

[Federal Register: October 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 205)]
[Notices]               
[Page 55065]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc09-112]                         

[[Page 55065]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-690]

 
In the Matter of: Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and 
Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 18, 2009, under 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on 
behalf of Ricoh Company, Ltd. of Japan; Ricoh Americas Corporation of 
West Caldwell, New Jersey; and Ricoh Electronics, Inc. of Tustin, 
California. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on October 
9, 2009. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain printing and 
imaging devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,764,866; 6,388,771; 6,209,048; 
6,212,343; and 5,863,690. The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and a cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office 
of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-3052.
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in 
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 
CFR 210.10 (2009).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the amended complaint, 
the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 20, 2009, ordered 
that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain printing and 
imaging devices or components thereof that infringe one or more of 
claims 1-6, 8, 11-15, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 5,764,866; claims 1-4, 
7, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,388,771; claims 1, 6-14, 16-21, 23-29, 
31-33, 38-44, 46-54, and 56-57 of U.S. Patent No. 6,209,048; claims 18-
21 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,343; and claims 1-16 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,863,690, and whether an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:

    (a) The complainants are--
Ricoh Company, Ltd., Ricoh Building, 8-13-1 Ginza, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-
8222, Japan.
Ricoh Americas Corporation, 5 Dedrick Place, West Caldwell, NJ 07006.
Ricoh Electronics, Inc., One Ricoh Square, 1100 Valencia Avenue, 
Tustin, CA 92780.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Oki Data Corporation, 4-11-22, Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8551, 
Japan.
Oki Data Americas, Inc., 2000 Bishops Gate Boulevard, Mount Laurel, NJ 
08054.

    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against a respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 20, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-25602 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]