Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation, 40804-40805 [2017-18140]

Download as PDF 40804 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES culturally affiliated to Native American descendants of the Koasati/Kaskinampo. These descendants include the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (previously listed as the AlabamaCoushatta Tribes of Texas); AlabamaQuassarte Tribal Town; Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana; and The Muscogee (Creek) Nation. Chronicles from Spanish explorers of the 16th century and French explorers of the 17th and 18th century indicate the presence of chiefdom level tribal entities in the southeastern United States which resemble the Mississippian chiefdoms. Linguistic analysis of place names noted by multiple Spanish explorers indicates that Koasati speaking groups inhabited northeastern Alabama. Early maps and research into the historic Native American occupation of northeastern Alabama indicates that the Koasati (as called by the English) or the Kaskinampo (as called by the French) were found at multiple sites in Jackson and Marshall Counties in the 17th and 18th centuries. Oral history, traditions, and expert opinions of the descendants of Koasati/Kaskinampo indicate that this portion of the Tennessee River valley was a homeland of the Koasati/Kaskinampo people. The subsequent involuntary diaspora of these peoples resulted in descendants of the Koasati/Kaskinampo among multiple federally recognized Indian Tribes. Determinations Made by the Tennessee Valley Authority Officials of the Tennessee Valley Authority have determined that: • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the four cultural items described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony and are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed from specific burial sites of Native American individuals. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the unassociated funerary objects and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (previously listed as the Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas); Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town; Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana; and The Muscogee (Creek) Nation. Additional Requestors and Disposition Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request with VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Aug 25, 2017 Jkt 241001 information in support of the claim to Dr. Thomas O. Maher, TVA, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT11D, Knoxville, TN 37902–1401, telephone (865) 632– 7458, email tomaher@tva.gov, by September 27, 2017. After that date, if no additional claimants have come forward, transfer of control of the unassociated funerary objects to the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (previously listed as the AlabamaCoushatta Tribes of Texas); AlabamaQuassarte Tribal Town; Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana; and The Muscogee (Creek) Nation may proceed. The TVA is responsible for notifying the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (previously listed as the Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas); Cherokee Nation; Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana; Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians; Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians; Poarch Band of Creeks (previously listed as the Poarch Band of Creek Indians of Alabama); The Chickasaw Nation; The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma; The Muscogee (Creek) Nation; The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma; and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma that this notice has been published. Dated: July 11, 2017. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2017–18187 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1039] Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 30) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation in its entirety based on a Settlement Agreement and Related Agreements. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 27, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Nokia Technologies Oy (‘‘Nokia’’) of Espoo, Finland. 82 FR 8626 (Jan. 27, 2017). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,415,247; 9,270,301; 6,393,260; and 6,826,391. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondent Apple Inc., a/k/a Apple Computer, Inc. (‘‘Apple’’) of Cupertino, California. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also participating in the investigation. This investigation was severed from Inv. No. 337–TA–1038. See Inv. No. 337– TA–1038, Order No. 1 (Jan. 26, 2017). On June 9, 2017, Nokia and Apple filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a Settlement Agreement and Related Agreements. OUII filed a response indicating that it does not oppose the motion once Nokia and Apple file a revised public version of the motion and accompanying agreements. On June 21, 2017, the ALJ ordered the parties to file a revised public version of all of the agreements. See Order No. 26 (June 21, 2017). That same day, the ALJ issued Order No. 27, granting the motion and certifying the confidential version of the agreements to the Commission. Nokia and Apple jointly submitted revised public versions of the agreements on June 30, 2017, and July 7, 2017. On July 19, 2017, the Commission determined to E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM 28AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Notices review Order No. 27, because the revised public versions of the agreements did not comply with Commission Rules 210.21(b) and 201.6. The Commission remanded the investigation to the ALJ to require the parties to file an updated public version of the agreements. On August 1, 2017, Nokia and Apple filed an updated public version of the agreements. On August 4, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 30) granting the parties’ June 9, 2017 motion to terminate and certified the confidential and public versions of the agreements to the Commission. On August 14, 2017, the ALJ issued a public version of the subject ID. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 23, 2017. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017–18140 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Cooperative Research Group on Hedge IV Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on HEDGE IV (‘‘HEDGE IV’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, The G.I.E. Regienov, Boulogne Billancourt, FRANCE, has been added as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Aug 25, 2017 Jkt 241001 project remains open, and HEDGE IV intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On February 14, 2017, HEDGE IV filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 FR 15238). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 9, 2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 20, 2017 (82 FR 33516). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. 40805 notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 6039). The last notification was filed with the Department on April 20, 2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2017 (82 FR 23297). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2017–18176 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P [FR Doc. 2017–18173 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—ODVA, INC. Notice is hereby given that, on July 27, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ODVA, Inc. (‘‘ODVA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Atop Technologies Inc., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; Dynatronix, Inc., Amery, WI; PMV Automation AB, Solna, SWEDEN; Buerkert Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelfingen, GERMANY; KEBA AG, Linz, AUSTRIA; U.I. Lapp GmbH, Stuttgart, GERMANY; MAC Valves, Inc., Wixom, MI; Lika Electronic ` Srl, Carre (VI), ITALY; and Power Electronics International, Inc., East Dundee, IL, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Lapp USA, Inc., Florham Park, NJ; Innovasic, Inc., Albuquerque, NM; and Beacon Global Technology, ChengDu, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional written PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—OpenDaylight Project, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 26, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), OpenDaylight Project, Inc. (‘‘OpenDaylight’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA; A10 Networks, San Jose, CA; KEMP Technologies, New York, NY; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA; ClearPath Networks, El Segundo, CA; Versa Networks, Santa Clara, CA; AlcatelLucent Enterprise, Calabasas, CA; and SDN Essentials, Sunnyvale, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenDaylight intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On May 23, 2013, OpenDaylight filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 1, 2013 (78 FR 39326). E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM 28AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40804-40805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1039]


Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet 
Computers, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination 
Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To 
Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; 
Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 30) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned 
investigation in its entirety based on a Settlement Agreement and 
Related Agreements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 27, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Nokia 
Technologies Oy (``Nokia'') of Espoo, Finland. 82 FR 8626 (Jan. 27, 
2017). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,415,247; 9,270,301; 6,393,260; and 
6,826,391. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry 
exists. The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondent 
Apple Inc., a/k/a Apple Computer, Inc. (``Apple'') of Cupertino, 
California. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is 
also participating in the investigation. This investigation was severed 
from Inv. No. 337-TA-1038. See Inv. No. 337-TA-1038, Order No. 1 (Jan. 
26, 2017).
    On June 9, 2017, Nokia and Apple filed a joint motion to terminate 
the investigation based on a Settlement Agreement and Related 
Agreements. OUII filed a response indicating that it does not oppose 
the motion once Nokia and Apple file a revised public version of the 
motion and accompanying agreements. On June 21, 2017, the ALJ ordered 
the parties to file a revised public version of all of the agreements. 
See Order No. 26 (June 21, 2017). That same day, the ALJ issued Order 
No. 27, granting the motion and certifying the confidential version of 
the agreements to the Commission. Nokia and Apple jointly submitted 
revised public versions of the agreements on June 30, 2017, and July 7, 
2017. On July 19, 2017, the Commission determined to

[[Page 40805]]

review Order No. 27, because the revised public versions of the 
agreements did not comply with Commission Rules 210.21(b) and 201.6. 
The Commission remanded the investigation to the ALJ to require the 
parties to file an updated public version of the agreements.
    On August 1, 2017, Nokia and Apple filed an updated public version 
of the agreements. On August 4, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID 
(Order No. 30) granting the parties' June 9, 2017 motion to terminate 
and certified the confidential and public versions of the agreements to 
the Commission. On August 14, 2017, the ALJ issued a public version of 
the subject ID.
    No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined 
not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 23, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18140 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P